Inversion of the Chordate Body Axis: Are There Alternatives?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Inversion of the Chordate Body Axis: Are There Alternatives? Perspective Inversion of the chordate body axis: Are there alternatives? J. Gerhart* Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3200 One major morphological difference between chordates and annelids or arthropods is the opposite orientation of the nerve cord and heart. A long-standing proposal is that the chordate axis evolved by inverting the body of an ancestor with the annelid͞arthropod orientation. However, the data can also be explained by a common ancestor with diffuse dorsoventral organization, followed by oppositely directed condensation of the nerve cord and relocation of the heart in the two lines. n 1822 Geoffroy St. Hilaire suggested nificance of this ancestor is great in meta- sally) (12). The common ancestor’s com- Ithat arthropods have the inverse dorso- zoan evolution, wrapped up as it is with plexity is also implied by complex antero- ventral organization of chordates. After the origins of bilateral animals. Modifica- posterior expression domains (emx, otx, acceptance of Darwin’s descent with mod- tion of a radially symmetric or biradial Hox genes) in the chordate and arthropod ification, Dohrn (1) proposed in 1875 that body plan into a bilateral body plan with a nervous systems (8), and by expression the last common ancestor of these groups dorsoventral axis is thought to have in- similarities in segmentation, eyes, and was an annelid worm-like animal with a volved many changes, including appear- limbs (13, 14). ventral nerve cord, a dorsal heart, and a ance of mesoderm and coeloms, conver- Furthermore, the embryonic ectoderm circulatory system with blood flowing an- sion of a closed gut to a through-gut, in flies and the embryonic mesoderm in teriorly in dorsal vessels. This orientation cephalization, and centralization of the frogs segregate into two dorsoventral do- was retained by evolving members of the nerve cord from a diffuse net. These mod- mains, inversely related in the two cases 25–30 protostome phyla (such as annelids ifications presumably occurred in steps (3, 10). Cells of one domain secrete cer- ␤ and arthropods) whereas, within the deu- between the time of the first simple bilat- tain type transforming growth factor terostomes (chordates, hemichordates, eral animal, variously called the ‘‘urbilat- signals (bone morphogenetic proteins 2, 4, and echinoderms), an ancestor of chor- eria’’ (3) or ‘‘bilaterogastrea’’ (4), and the and 7 in chordates; Dpp in Drosophila), dates inverted its body, sideways over, but time of the last common ancestor of mod- and cells of the other do not but do secrete PERSPECTIVE retained the same relative organ place- ern bilateral animals. Because the fossil antagonists of these signals (Chordin in ments. The nerve cord was now dorsal, record and modern phylogenies give few chordates; Sog in Drosophila). These the heart ventral, and the blood flowed clues (see below) about the ancestor, it genes seem particularly significant be- anteriorly in ventral vessels (Fig. 1). In would be significant if comparative mo- cause their domains may serve as dorso- chordates, axial muscle blocks were dor- lecular and anatomical data could illumi- ventral compartments of the body axis solateral and visceral mesoderm was ven- nate its character. (like Hox compartments of the anteropos- trolateral whereas protostomes had the op- terior axis). Hence, they might reveal posite arrangement. In the chordate line, Recent Evidence for Inversion. Modern pro- global body organization rather than spe- SPECIAL FEATURE the mouth eventually formed on the new ponents of inversion, who have taken gene cific cell type differentiation or local organ ventral side and vanished from the old lo- expression data as evidence, include development. The molecular data support cation. Thus, in the amended inversion hy- Arendt and Nu¨bler-Jung (5–9), De Rob- the assertions from morphology that nerve cords, hearts, and dorsoventral or- pothesis, the last common ancestor already ertis and Sasai (2), and Holley and Fer- ganization of all modern bilateral animals had a complex differentiated dorsoventral guson (10). Data are striking on the sim- derive from organs and organization of a axis. After protostomes and deuterostomes ilar but inverted domains of expression of complex common ancestor, with body diverged, members of each group would several orthologous genes in embryos of inversion in one of the two lines. have added organs along this axis. In chor- chordates (mostly frogs and mice) and When did inversion occur? Deutero- dates, for example, besides a dorsal hollow protostomes (mostly Drosophila). In the stomes currently include chordates, hemi- nerve cord and ventral heart, there evolved nerve cord, three genes, vnd͞Nk2, ind͞ ͞ chordates, and echinoderms (15, 16). Be- a dorsal notochord, ventrolateral gill slits, Gsh1,2, and Msh Msx1,3, are expressed in cause the body axis of echinoderms is a ventral endostyle in the pharynx, and a three columns of nerve cells aligned me- greatly (and intriguingly) modified, only dorsal postanal tail. None of these is found dial to lateral (11). Also, the netrin gene(s) the hemichordate-chordate comparison in protostomes, which would have added is expressed in the medial floor plate of has been pursued. The worm-like entero- other organs. the chordate nerve cord and the ventral pneust hemichordates differ from chor- After denunciation of it by Cuvier in midline mesectoderm of Drosophila. Be- dates in having a ventral nerve cord, a 1830, the hypothesis was reasserted and cause the similarities seem too complex to protostome-like direction of blood flow, a rejected every 50 years to the present (1). have arisen by evolutionary convergence, liver-like organ protruding dorsally from Recent data on regional gene expression the data imply a complex nerve cord in the the gut (rather than ventrally as in chor- in embryos of fruit flies, frogs, and mice last common ancestor. Results with the dates), a notochord-like pygocord located ͞ have brought new credibility to the hy- heart are also striking. The tinman csk ventrally and posteriorly, a ventral post- pothesis and to deductions about the com- (also called Nkx2-5) gene is expressed very plexity of the last common ancestor of early in the prospective heart region in protostomes and deuterostomes. The sig- chordates (ventrally) and arthropods (dor- *E-mail: [email protected]. PNAS ͉ April 25, 2000 ͉ vol. 97 ͉ no. 9 ͉ 4445–4448 Downloaded by guest on September 30, 2021 new ventral nerve cord in an animal al- ready having a mouth (ventral by defini- tion). Then, inversion occurred later in the chordate line to make it a dorsal cord, and the mouth relocated to the opposite side. Lacalli (21) suggested that a larval ances- tor formed the nerve cord from ciliary rows at a time when it had only one terminal gut opening, and, hence, its dor- soventral axis was ambiguous. Descen- dents on the deuterostome branch perfo- rated a mouth on the side opposite the nerve cord, making it dorsal. Those on the Fig. 1. The inversion hypothesis. (A) An annelid worm, side view. The mouth (m) and nerve cord (dark shading) are ventral. The gut (light shading) is midlevel. Arrows indicate the direction of blood flow. protostome branch formed a mouth on the Inverted, it is a chordate, with the nerve cord dorsal, the gut ventral, and the blood flowing in the opposite same side as the nerve cord, making it direction. A new mouth (stomadeum) and anus (proctodeum) evolve in the chordate. Modified from ref. ventral. Inversion did not really occur 2. (B) The dorsoventral axis in cross section, trunk level. because the mouth arose after the nerve cord. In a related idea (22), a ctenophore- like ancestor with a concentrated nerve anal tail, and a dorsal endostyle-like organ have a mouth separate from the anus, by cord had two opposing openings (anal (Table 1). From these differences, several which to assign dorsoventral orientation? pores) in addition to a terminal gut open- authors (9, 17–19) have concluded that In the absence of intermediate phyla, the ing, also precluding a definition of the enteropneusts have protostome-like orga- possibility of a complex, well organized dorsoventral axis. One of these pores was nization and that inversion must have ancestor cannot be excluded, but it gains retained as a mouth by protostomes and occurred in the chordate line after they no additional support. the other by deuterostomes. These hy- branched off. As noted later, other fea- Critics of inversion have usually favored potheses have in common that the dorso- tures can be used to argue for non- a less complex common ancestor and a ventral axis of the last common ancestor of inversion. different path of chordate evolution. modern bilateral animals was relatively Some of these hypotheses can accommo- undifferentiated and ambiguous, and, Alternatives to Inversion. Recent molecular date the morphological and molecular hence, inversion from one orientation to phylogenies (18S RNA sequences) have data as well as does the inversion hypoth- another is not an issue. As discussed later, deepened the uncertainty about the com- esis. In the Auricularia Hypothesis (20), these alternatives must still rationalize the plexity of the last common ancestor (15, hemichordates and chordates evolved striking inverted gene expression patterns. 16). Bilateral metazoa now fall into three from a bilateral larval ancestor. Through a Related hypotheses involving an ancestor large groups of phyla: the ecdysozoa, lo- series of intermediates, bilateral ciliary such as a bilaterogastrea (4) or a larva-like photrochozoa, and deuterostomes. Deu- rows and the associated nerve net moved bilateral micrometazoan (23) as the plat- terostomes are the sister group of the dorsally, fused at the midline, and sank form for the diversification of bilateral other two protostome groups. In this phy- inside to form a new dorsal cord, without metazoa address early steps of evolving logeny, few, if any, intermediate phyla inversion (paedomorphosis followed).
Recommended publications
  • "Lophophorates" Brachiopoda Echinodermata Asterozoa
    Deuterostomes Bryozoa Phoronida "lophophorates" Brachiopoda Echinodermata Asterozoa Stelleroidea Asteroidea Ophiuroidea Echinozoa Holothuroidea Echinoidea Crinozoa Crinoidea Chaetognatha (arrow worms) Hemichordata (acorn worms) Chordata Urochordata (sea squirt) Cephalochordata (amphioxoius) Vertebrata PHYLUM CHAETOGNATHA (70 spp) Arrow worms Fossils from the Cambrium Carnivorous - link between small phytoplankton and larger zooplankton (1-15 cm long) Pharyngeal gill pores No notochord Peculiar origin for mesoderm (not strictly enterocoelous) Uncertain relationship with echinoderms PHYLUM HEMICHORDATA (120 spp) Acorn worms Pharyngeal gill pores No notochord (Stomochord cartilaginous and once thought homologous w/notochord) Tornaria larvae very similar to asteroidea Bipinnaria larvae CLASS ENTEROPNEUSTA (acorn worms) Marine, bottom dwellers CLASS PTEROBRANCHIA Colonial, sessile, filter feeding, tube dwellers Small (1-2 mm), "U" shaped gut, no gill slits PHYLUM CHORDATA Body segmented Axial notochord Dorsal hollow nerve chord Paired gill slits Post anal tail SUBPHYLUM UROCHORDATA Marine, sessile Body covered in a cellulose tunic ("Tunicates") Filter feeder (» 200 L/day) - perforated pharnx adapted for filtering & repiration Pharyngeal basket contractable - squirts water when exposed at low tide Hermaphrodites Tadpole larvae w/chordate characteristics (neoteny) CLASS ASCIDIACEA (sea squirt/tunicate - sessile) No excretory system Open circulatory system (can reverse blood flow) Endostyle - (homologous to thyroid of vertebrates) ciliated groove
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Selection on a Chordate Histocompatibility Locus
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01787.x EVIDENCE FOR SELECTION ON A CHORDATE HISTOCOMPATIBILITY LOCUS Marie L. Nydam,1,2,3 Alyssa A. Taylor,3 and Anthony W. De Tomaso3 1Division of Science and Mathematics, Centre College, Danville, Kentucky 40422 2E-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106 Received June 7, 2011 Accepted July 31, 2012 Allorecognition is the ability of an organism to differentiate self or close relatives from unrelated individuals. The best known applications of allorecognition are the prevention of inbreeding in hermaphroditic species (e.g., the self-incompatibility [SI] systems in plants), the vertebrate immune response to foreign antigens mediated by MHC loci, and somatic fusion, where two genetically independent individuals physically join to become a chimera. In the few model systems where the loci governing allorecognition outcomes have been identified, the corresponding proteins have exhibited exceptional polymorphism. But information about the evolution of this polymorphism outside MHC is limited. We address this subject in the ascidian Botryllus schlosseri,where allorecognition outcomes are determined by a single locus, called FuHC (Fusion/HistoCompatibility). Molecular variation in FuHC is distributed almost entirely within populations, with very little evidence for differentiation among different populations. Mutation plays a larger role than recombination in the creation of FuHC polymorphism. A selection statistic, neutrality tests, and distribution of variation within and among different populations all provide evidence for selection acting on FuHC, but are not in agreement as to whether the selection is balancing or directional.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Chordate Larvae Donald I Williamson* Marine Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, United Kingdom
    lopmen ve ta e l B Williamson, Cell Dev Biol 2012, 1:1 D io & l l o l g DOI: 10.4172/2168-9296.1000101 e y C Cell & Developmental Biology ISSN: 2168-9296 Research Article Open Access The Origins of Chordate Larvae Donald I Williamson* Marine Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, United Kingdom Abstract The larval transfer hypothesis states that larvae originated as adults in other taxa and their genomes were transferred by hybridization. It contests the view that larvae and corresponding adults evolved from common ancestors. The present paper reviews the life histories of chordates, and it interprets them in terms of the larval transfer hypothesis. It is the first paper to apply the hypothesis to craniates. I claim that the larvae of tunicates were acquired from adult larvaceans, the larvae of lampreys from adult cephalochordates, the larvae of lungfishes from adult craniate tadpoles, and the larvae of ray-finned fishes from other ray-finned fishes in different families. The occurrence of larvae in some fishes and their absence in others is correlated with reproductive behavior. Adult amphibians evolved from adult fishes, but larval amphibians did not evolve from either adult or larval fishes. I submit that [1] early amphibians had no larvae and that several families of urodeles and one subfamily of anurans have retained direct development, [2] the tadpole larvae of anurans and urodeles were acquired separately from different Mesozoic adult tadpoles, and [3] the post-tadpole larvae of salamanders were acquired from adults of other urodeles. Reptiles, birds and mammals probably evolved from amphibians that never acquired larvae.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the Annelid Axochord: Insights Into Notochord Evolution Antonella Lauri Et Al
    RESEARCH | REPORTS ORIGIN OF NOTOCHORD by double WMISH (Fig. 2, F to L). Although none of the genes were exclusively expressed in the annelid mesodermal midline, their combined Development of the annelid coexpression was unique to these cells (implying that mesodermal midline in annelids and chor- damesoderm in vertebrates are more similar to axochord: Insights into each other than to any other tissue). It is unlikely that the molecular similarity between annelid notochord evolution and vertebrate mesodermal midline is due to in- dependent co-option of a conserved gene cas- Antonella Lauri,1*† Thibaut Brunet,1* Mette Handberg-Thorsager,1,2‡ sette, because this would require either that this Antje H.L. Fischer,1§ Oleg Simakov,1 Patrick R. H. Steinmetz,1‖ Raju Tomer,1,2¶ cassette was active elsewhere in the body (which Philipp J. Keller,2 Detlev Arendt1,3# is not the case) or that multiple identical inde- pendent events of co-option occurred (which is The origin of chordates has been debated for more than a century, with one key issue being unparsimonious). As in vertebrates, the meso- the emergence of the notochord. In vertebrates, the notochord develops by convergence dermal midline resembles the neuroectodermal and extension of the chordamesoderm, a population of midline cells of unique molecular midline, which expresses foxD, foxA, netrin, slit, identity. We identify a population of mesodermal cells in a developing invertebrate, the marine and noggin (figs. S6 and S7) but not brachyury or annelid Platynereis dumerilii, that converges and extends toward the midline and expresses a twist. However, unlike in chicken (10), the an- notochord-specific combination of genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin of Chordates Part-I
    ORIGIN OF CHORDATES Evolution of chordate was one of the most important event in the history of chordate as it was the beginning of evolution of more advanced chordates like bird and mammals. It is the story of origin from a primitive invertebrate like creatures to early chordates. Though first fossil of the first vertebrate the ostrachoderm was discovered from the Ordovician period but it might have originated in late Cambrian period. As early chordates were soft bodied, their fossil records are not preserved. Hence, to trace their ancestry, we have to find out the similarity among different deuterostomes to trace the origin of chordates. Some structural features shared by them such as bilateral symmetry, antero-posterior body axis, triploblastic coelomate condition, etc., may he because of their common ancestry. TIME OF ORIGIN: Late Cambrian period PLACE OF ORIGIN: Fresh water THEORIES OF INVERTEBRATE ANCESTRY OF CHORDATES Several theories have been put forwarded to explain the origin of chordates either directly from some invertebrate group or through the intervention of some protochordate. Almost every invertebrate phylum—Coelenterata, Nemertean, Phoronida, Annelids, Arthropods and Echinodermatashas been suggested. But these theories are far from being satisfactory and convincing and have only a historical value. Only the echinoderm theory has received some acceptance. DIVISION OF BILATERIA The Bilateria is divided into two major divisions (1) Protostomia and (2) Deuterostornia. This division is based on the differences in embryonic and larval developments. Protostomia includes from Annelida to Arthropoda while deuterostomia includes Echinodermata, Pogonophora and Chordate. DEUTEROSTOME LINE OF CHORDATE EVOLUTION Following common features of all Deuterostomes suggests strong evidence of a closer evolutionary relationship between the three principal deuterostome phyla – Echinodermata, Hemichordata and Chordata.
    [Show full text]
  • Convergent Evolution of the Ladder-Like Ventral Nerve Cord in Annelida Conrad Helm1*, Patrick Beckers2, Thomas Bartolomaeus2, Stephan H
    Helm et al. Frontiers in Zoology (2018) 15:36 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-018-0280-y RESEARCH Open Access Convergent evolution of the ladder-like ventral nerve cord in Annelida Conrad Helm1*, Patrick Beckers2, Thomas Bartolomaeus2, Stephan H. Drukewitz3, Ioannis Kourtesis1, Anne Weigert4, Günter Purschke5, Katrine Worsaae6, Torsten H. Struck7 and Christoph Bleidorn1,8* Abstract Background: A median, segmented, annelid nerve cord has repeatedly been compared to the arthropod and vertebrate nerve cords and became the most used textbook representation of the annelid nervous system. Recent phylogenomic analyses, however, challenge the hypothesis that a subepidermal rope-ladder-like ventral nerve cord (VNC) composed of a paired serial chain of ganglia and somata-free connectives represents either a plesiomorphic or a typical condition in annelids. Results: Using a comparative approach by combining phylogenomic analyses with morphological methods (immunohistochemistry and CLSM, histology and TEM), we compiled a comprehensive dataset to reconstruct the evolution of the annelid VNC. Our phylogenomic analyses generally support previous topologies. However, the so far hard-to-place Apistobranchidae and Psammodrilidae are now incorporated among the basally branching annelids with high support. Based on this topology we reconstruct an intraepidermal VNC as the ancestral state in Annelida. Thus, a subepidermal ladder-like nerve cord clearly represents a derived condition. Conclusions: Based on the presented data, a ladder-like appearance of the ventral nerve cord evolved repeatedly, and independently of the transition from an intraepidermal to a subepidermal cord during annelid evolution. Our investigations thereby propose an alternative set of neuroanatomical characteristics for the last common ancestor of Annelida or perhaps even Spiralia.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Phylum Poster Porifera
    Phylum PORIFERA CNIDARIA PLATYHELMINTHES ANNELIDA MOLLUSCA ECHINODERMATA ARTHROPODA CHORDATA Hexactinellida -- glass (siliceous) Anthozoa -- corals and sea Turbellaria -- free-living or symbiotic Polychaetes -- segmented Gastopods -- snails and slugs Asteroidea -- starfish Trilobitomorpha -- tribolites (extinct) Urochordata -- tunicates Groups sponges anemones flatworms (Dugusia) bristleworms Bivalves -- clams, scallops, mussels Echinoidea -- sea urchins, sand Chelicerata Cephalochordata -- lancelets (organisms studied in detail in Demospongia -- spongin or Hydrazoa -- hydras, some corals Trematoda -- flukes (parasitic) Oligochaetes -- earthworms (Lumbricus) Cephalopods -- squid, octopus, dollars Arachnida -- spiders, scorpions Mixini -- hagfish siliceous sponges Xiphosura -- horseshoe crabs Bio1AL are underlined) Cubozoa -- box jellyfish, sea wasps Cestoda -- tapeworms (parasitic) Hirudinea -- leeches nautilus Holothuroidea -- sea cucumbers Petromyzontida -- lamprey Mandibulata Calcarea -- calcareous sponges Scyphozoa -- jellyfish, sea nettles Monogenea -- parasitic flatworms Polyplacophora -- chitons Ophiuroidea -- brittle stars Chondrichtyes -- sharks, skates Crustacea -- crustaceans (shrimp, crayfish Scleropongiae -- coralline or Crinoidea -- sea lily, feather stars Actinipterygia -- ray-finned fish tropical reef sponges Hexapoda -- insects (cockroach, fruit fly) Sarcopterygia -- lobed-finned fish Myriapoda Amphibia (frog, newt) Chilopoda -- centipedes Diplopoda -- millipedes Reptilia (snake, turtle) Aves (chicken, hummingbird) Mammalia
    [Show full text]
  • Biology of Chordates Video Guide
    Branches on the Tree of Life DVD – CHORDATES Written and photographed by David Denning and Bruce Russell ©2005, BioMEDIA ASSOCIATES (THUMBNAIL IMAGES IN THIS GUIDE ARE FROM THE DVD PROGRAM) .. .. To many students, the phylum Chordata doesn’t seem to make much sense. It contains such apparently disparate animals as tunicates (sea squirts), lancelets, fish and humans. This program explores the evolution, structure and classification of chordates with the main goal to clarify the unity of Phylum Chordata. All chordates possess four characteristics that define the phylum, although in most species, these characteristics can only be seen during a relatively small portion of the life cycle (and this is often an embryonic or larval stage, when the animal is difficult to observe). These defining characteristics are: the notochord (dorsal stiffening rod), a hollow dorsal nerve cord; pharyngeal gills; and a post anal tail that includes the notochord and nerve cord. Subphylum Urochordata The most primitive chordates are the tunicates or sea squirts, and closely related groups such as the larvaceans (Appendicularians). In tunicates, the chordate characteristics can be observed only by examining the entire life cycle. The adult feeds using a ‘pharyngeal basket’, a type of pharyngeal gill formed into a mesh-like basket. Cilia on the gill draw water into the mouth, through the basket mesh and out the excurrent siphon. Tunicates have an unusual heart which pumps by ‘wringing out’. It also reverses direction periodically. Tunicates are usually hermaphroditic, often casting eggs and sperm directly into the sea. After fertilization, the zygote develops into a ‘tadpole larva’. This swimming larva shows the remaining three chordate characters - notochord, dorsal nerve cord and post-anal tail.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nervous System in Lumbriculus Variegatus C
    [ NOTE: The following is an unpublished summary about nervous system design and function in the blackworm, Lumbriculus variegatus (Class Oligochaeta). This worm is being used at high school and college levels for student laboratory exercises and research projects. It has proven quite useful and reliable for studies of segment regeneration, circulatory physiology, locomotion, eco-toxicology, and neurobiology (Drewes, 1996a; Lesiuk and Drewes, 1998; Drewes and Cain, 1998). The following article provides students and instructors with general information about this worm’s nervous system which is not currently available in any biology texts. Correspondence or questions about this information are welcome. Please address to: Charles Drewes, Zoology & Genetics, Room 339 Science II Building, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011; or phone: (515) 294-8061; or email: [email protected] ]. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Functional organization of the nervous system in Lumbriculus variegatus C. Drewes (April. 2002) The gross anatomy of the nervous system in Lumbriculus variegatus was originally described more than 70 years ago by Isossimow (1926), with an English summary of that work given in Stephenson’s book, The Oligochaeta (1930). Virtually no published studies of this worm’s neurophysiology or behavior were done until the late 1980’s. The central nervous system in Lumbriculus consists of a cerebral ganglion (or “brain”), located in segment #1, and a ventral nerve cord that extends through every body segment (Figure 1). In each segment, except the first two, the ventral nerve cord gives rise to four pairs of segmental nerves. [Comparative note: In the earthworm, Lumbricus terrestris, there are three pairs of segmental nerve in each segment.] The segmental nerves extend laterally into the body wall where they form a series of parallel rings that extend within and around the body wall (for review, see Stephenson, 1930.).
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Phylum Chordata
    Unifying Themes 1. Chordate evolution is a history of innovations that is built upon major invertebrate traits •bilateral symmetry •cephalization •segmentation •coelom or "gut" tube 2. Chordate evolution is marked by physical and behavioral specializations • For example the forelimb of mammals has a wide range of structural variation, specialized by natural selection 3. Evolutionary innovations and specializations led to adaptive radiations - the development of a variety of forms from a single ancestral group Characteristics of the Chordates 1. Notochord 2. dorsal hollow nerve cord 3. pharyngeal gill slits 4. postanal tail 5. endostyle Characteristics of the Chordates Notochord •stiff, flexible rod, provides internal support • Remains throughout the life of most invertebrate chordates • only in the embryos of vertebrate chordates Characteristics of the Chordates cont. Dorsal Hollow Nerve Cord (Spinal Cord) •fluid-filled tube of nerve tissue, runs the length of the animal, just dorsal to the notochord • Present in chordates throughout embryonic and adult life Characteristics of the Chordates cont. Pharyngeal gill slits • Pairs of opening through the pharynx • Invertebrate chordates use them to filter food •In fishes the gill sits develop into true gills • In reptiles, birds, and mammals the gill slits are vestiges (occurring only in the embryo) Characteristics of the Chordates cont. Endostyle • mucous secreting structure found in the pharynx floor (traps small food particles) Characteristics of the Chordates cont. Postanal Tail • works with muscles (myomeres) & notochord to provide motility & stability • Aids in propulsion in nonvertebrates & fish but vestigial in later lineages SubPhylum Urochordata Ex: tunicates or sea squirts • Sessile as adults, but motile during the larval stages • Possess all 5 chordate characteristics as larvae • Settle head first on hard substrates and undergo a dramatic metamorphosis • tail, notochord, muscle segments, and nerve cord disappear SubPhylum Urochordata cont.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on the Efferent Innervation of the Body Wall Musculature of Lumbricus Terrestris (L)
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1975 Study on the Efferent Innervation of the Body Wall Musculature of Lumbricus Terrestris (L) Carol A. Aslam Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the Anatomy Commons Recommended Citation Aslam, Carol A., "Study on the Efferent Innervation of the Body Wall Musculature of Lumbricus Terrestris (L)" (1975). Master's Theses. 2749. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/2749 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1975 Carol A. Aslam STUDY ON THE EFFERENT INNERVATION OF THE BODY WALL ~USCULATURE OF LUMBRICUS TERRESTRIS (L.) by Carol Aslam A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Loyola University of Chicago in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science November 1975 .s. ' '.. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author will always be indebted to her advisor, Dr. Robert Hadek, for unfailing support and scientific criticism throughout the preparation of this manuscript. Special thanks are also due to members of the De­ partment of Anatomy who generously gave of their time, counsel and technical assistance. The encouragement of my husband and enduring patience of my children have made possible the completion of this program. ii BIOGkAPllY Carol A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ventral Nerve Cord of Lithobius Forficatus (Lithobiomorpha): Morphology, Neuroanatomy, and Individually Identifiable Neurons
    76 (3): 377 – 394 11.12.2018 © Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 2018. A comparative analysis of the ventral nerve cord of Lithobius forficatus (Lithobiomorpha): morphology, neuroanatomy, and individually identifiable neurons Vanessa Schendel, Matthes Kenning & Andy Sombke* University of Greifswald, Zoological Institute and Museum, Cytology and Evolutionary Biology, Soldmannstrasse 23, 17487 Greifswald, Germany; Vanessa Schendel [[email protected]]; Matthes Kenning [[email protected]]; Andy Sombke * [andy. [email protected]] — * Corresponding author Accepted 19.iv.2018. Published online at www.senckenberg.de/arthropod-systematics on 27.xi.2018. Editors in charge: Markus Koch & Klaus-Dieter Klass Abstract. In light of competing hypotheses on arthropod phylogeny, independent data are needed in addition to traditional morphology and modern molecular approaches. One promising approach involves comparisons of structure and development of the nervous system. In addition to arthropod brain and ventral nerve cord morphology and anatomy, individually identifiable neurons (IINs) provide new charac- ter sets for comparative neurophylogenetic analyses. However, very few species and transmitter systems have been investigated, and still fewer species of centipedes have been included in such analyses. In a multi-methodological approach, we analyze the ventral nerve cord of the centipede Lithobius forficatus using classical histology, X-ray micro-computed tomography and immunohistochemical experiments, combined with confocal laser-scanning microscopy to characterize walking leg ganglia and identify IINs using various neurotransmitters. In addition to the subesophageal ganglion, the ventral nerve cord of L. forficatus is composed of the forcipular ganglion, 15 well-separated walking leg ganglia, each associated with eight pairs of nerves, and the fused terminal ganglion. Within the medially fused hemiganglia, distinct neuropilar condensations are located in the ventral-most domain.
    [Show full text]