DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecology of the Smooth Softshell in the Kaskaskia River: Implications for Managing Flows in an Altered System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ecology of the Smooth Softshell in the Kaskaskia River: Implications for Managing Flows in an Altered System INHS Technical Report: 2015(11):1–219 + iii Date of Issue: 25 May 2015 ECOLOGY OF THE SMOOTH SOFTSHELL IN THE KASKASKIA RIVER: IMPLICATIONS FOR MANAGING FLOWS IN AN ALTERED SYSTEM Submitted by: Jason P. Ross, Michael J. Dreslik, and Robert Bluett Prepared for: Illinois Department of Natural Resources One Natural Resources Way Springfield, Illinois 62702-1271 Fund Title – IDNR T-87-D-1 Restricted Access – T&E Species Locations Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Brian D. Anderson, Executive Director Illinois Natural History Survey Geoffrey A. Levin, Director 1816 South Oak Street Champaign, IL 61820 217-333-6830 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................1 HABITAT AND SPATIAL NEEDS ..................................................................................................... 1 COMMUNITY AND POPULATION STRUCTURE ................................................................................ 2 BEHAVIORAL RESPONSES ............................................................................................................. 2 PHENOLOGICAL RISKS .................................................................................................................. 2 MANAGEMENT RESPONSES ........................................................................................................... 3 STUDY SITE .................................................................................................................3 METHODS ........................................................................................................................ 4 GENERAL METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................ 4 Trapping ................................................................................................................................... 4 Individual Turtles ..................................................................................................................... 4 Radio Telemetry ...................................................................................................................... 5 Location Data ........................................................................................................................... 5 Environmental Data ................................................................................................................. 5 Behavioral Data ....................................................................................................................... 6 DATA ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................... 6 Community and Population Structure ...................................................................................... 6 Movement ................................................................................................................................ 6 Home Range ............................................................................................................................ 7 Habitat Use .............................................................................................................................. 8 Survival .................................................................................................................................. 10 RESULTS ....................................................................................................................10 TRAPPING ................................................................................................................................... 10 POPULATION STRUCTURE ........................................................................................................... 11 Apalone mutica ...................................................................................................................... 11 Apalone spinifera ................................................................................................................... 11 Chelydra serpentina ............................................................................................................... 11 Chrysemys picta ..................................................................................................................... 11 Graptemys geographica ......................................................................................................... 12 Graptemys ouachitensis ......................................................................................................... 12 i Sternotherus odoratus ............................................................................................................ 12 Trachemys scripta .................................................................................................................. 12 COMMUNITY PARAMETERS ......................................................................................................... 12 RADIO TELEMETRY .................................................................................................................... 13 MOVEMENT ................................................................................................................................ 13 HOME RANGE ............................................................................................................................. 14 HABITAT USE ............................................................................................................................. 15 SURVIVAL................................................................................................................................... 17 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................... 17 HABITAT AND SPATIAL NEEDS ................................................................................................... 17 Extent - Movement ................................................................................................................ 17 Extent – Home Range ............................................................................................................ 20 Fragmentation ........................................................................................................................ 22 Composition-Structure ........................................................................................................... 23 COMMUNITY AND POPULATION STRUCTURE .............................................................................. 25 Competitors ............................................................................................................................ 25 Recruitment ............................................................................................................................ 26 Mortality ................................................................................................................................ 27 BEHAVIORAL RESPONSES ........................................................................................................... 28 Activity Levels and Behavioral Shifts ................................................................................... 28 Thermal Challenges ............................................................................................................... 29 PHENOLOGICAL RISKS ................................................................................................................ 30 Nesting ................................................................................................................................... 30 Overwintering ........................................................................................................................ 30 MANAGEMENT RESPONSES ........................................................................................... 31 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................. 33 LITERATURE CITED ...................................................................................................34 TABLES ......................................................................................................................... 40 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ 60 MAPS.........................................................................................................................92 PLATES .................................................................................................................... 133 APPENDIX I – RADIO-LOCATIONS ............................................................................... 142 2 APPENDIX II – TURTLE CAPTURES ........................................................................... 184 APPENDIX III – TRAP LOCATIONS .............................................................................. 206 APPENDIX IV – RADIO-TRACKED TURTLE SURVIVAL NOTES ................................... 218 3 INTRODUCTION Riverine ecosystems are vital for many at-risk species (Allan and Flecker, 1993), yet widespread degradation in the United States has left few rivers with outstanding natural qualities (Palmer, 1994). Such degradation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annex 1 附表1 More Endangered Species Are Brought Into Control 更
    Annex 1 附表 1 More Endangered Species are brought into Control 更多瀕危物種納入管制 1. Inclusion in Appendix I 列入附錄 I Species 物種 Common Name (for reference only) 俗稱 (只供參考) Lizards 蜥蜴 Abronia anzuetoi Anzuetoi alligator lizard 樹鱷蜥、安氏樹鱷蛇蜥 Abronia campbelli Campbell's alligator lizard 樹鱷蜥、坎氏樹鱷蛇蜥 Abronia fimbriata Fringed arboreal alligator lizard 樹鱷蜥、飾緣樹鱷蛇蜥 Abronia frosti Frost's alligator lizard 樹鱷蜥、弗氏樹鱷蛇蜥 Abronia meledona Meledona alligator lizard 樹鱷蜥、米拉多拉樹鱷蛇蜥 Cnemaspis psychedelica Psychedelic rock gecko 彩色壁虎、幻彩東虎 Lygodactylus williamsi Turquoise dwarf gecko 侏儒日光守宮、青藍柳趾虎、鈷藍日守宮 Frog 蛙 Telmatobius culeus Titicaca water frog 的的喀喀湖水蛙 Snails 蝸牛 Polymita spp. Cuban landsnails 古巴蝸牛屬所有種、彩條蝸牛屬所有種 2. Transfer from Appendix II to Appendix I 由附錄 II 轉入附錄 I Species 物種 Common Name (for reference only) 俗稱 (只供參考) Pangolins 穿山甲 Manis crassicaudata Indian pangolin 印度穿山甲 Manis culionensis Philippine pangolin 菲律賓穿山甲 Manis gigantea Giant pangolin 大穿山甲 Manis javanica Sunda pangolin 馬來穿山甲 Manis pentadactyla Chinese pangolin 中華穿山甲 Manis temminckii South African pangolin 南非穿山甲 Manis tetradactyla Long-tailed pangolin 長尾穿山甲 Manis tricuspis White-bellied pangolin 樹穿山甲 Monkey 猴 Macaca sylvanus Barbary macaque 巴巴利獼猴、北非獼猴 Parrot 鸚鵡 Psittacus erithacus African grey parrot 非洲灰鸚鵡 Lizard 蜥蜴 Shinisaurus crocodilurus Chinese crocodile lizard 瑤山鱷蜥 Plants 植物 Sclerocactus blainei Blaine's fishhook cactus 布氏白虹山 Sclerocactus cloverae New Mexico fishhook cactus 新墨西哥鯱玉 Sclerocactus sileri Siler's fishhook cactus 塞氏鯱玉 3. Transfer from Appendix I to Appendix II 由附錄 I 轉入附錄 II Species 物種 Common Name (for reference only) 俗稱 (只供參考) Mammals 哺乳類 Puma concolor coryi Florida cougar, Florida puma 美洲獅佛羅里達亞種 Puma concolor couguar Eastern cougar, eastern puma 美洲獅東部亞種 Equus zebra zebra Cape mountain zebra 山斑馬指名亞種 Ave s 鳥類 Lichenostomus melanops cassidix Helmeted honeyeater 黃披肩吸蜜鳥卡西迪亞種 Ninox novaeseelandiae undulata Norfolk boobook 布布克鷹鴞諾福克島亞種 Crocodiles 鱷魚 Crocodylus acutus 1 American crocodile 窄吻鱷 Crocodylus porosus 2 Estuarine crocodile 灣鱷 Frog 蛙 Dyscophus antongilii Tomato frog 安通吉爾灣姬蛙 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma (Oklahoma Social Studies Standards, OSDE)
    OKLAHOMA INDIAN TRIBE EDUCATION GUIDE Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma (Oklahoma Social Studies Standards, OSDE) Tribe: Peoria Tribe of Indians (pee-awr-ee -uh) Tribal website(s): http//www.peoriatribe.com 1. Migration/movement/forced removal Oklahoma History C3 Standard 2.3 “Integrate visual and textual evidence to explain the reasons for and trace the migrations of Native American peoples including the Five Tribes into present-day Oklahoma, the Indian Removal Act of 1830, and tribal resistance to the forced relocations.” Oklahoma History C3 Standard 2.7 “Compare and contrast multiple points of view to evaluate the impact of the Dawes Act which resulted in the loss of tribal communal lands and the redistribution of lands by various means including land runs as typified by the Unassigned Lands and the Cherokee Outlet, lotteries, and tribal allotments.” Original Homeland - The Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma is a confederation of Kaskaskia, Peoria, Piankeshaw and Wea Indians united into a single tribe in 1854. The tribes which constitute The Confederated Peorias, as they then were called, originated in the lands bordering the Great Lakes and drained by the mighty Mississippi. They are Illinois or Illini Indians, descendants of those who created the great mound civilizations in the central United States two thousand to three thousand years ago. The increased pressure from white settlers in the 1840’s and 1850’s in Kansas brought cooperation among the Peoria, Kaskaskia, Piankashaw and Wea Tribes to protect these holdings. By the Treaty of May 30, 1854, 10 Stat. 1082, the United States recognized the cooperation and consented to their formal union as the Confederated Peoria.
    [Show full text]
  • Time for a Field Trip!
    Field Trip Curriculum for 4th-6th Grade Students Time for a Field Trip! Pre-Field Trip Warm Up____________________ Starved Rock and Matthiessen State Parks IDNR Educational Trunks: People and Animals from Illinois’ Past https://www2.illinois.gov/dnr/education/Pages/ ItemsForLoan.aspx Group Permit Form (to be completed prior to visit) https://www2.illinois.gov/dnr/Parks/Activity/Pages/ StarvedRock.aspx Enjoy Your Trip! Starved Rock Wigwam STEAM Activity- Pages 2 & 3 “Starved Rock History and Activity Packet - Pages 4-10 Thank you for your Day of Field Trip Activities________________________ interest in Starved 1.5 –2 hours Rock State Park. The Field Trip Pack for Teachers following is a packet of https://www2.illinois.gov/dnr/education/Pages/ materials intended to assist teachers in using ItemsForLoan.aspx the site for field trips. Hike to Starved Rock and French Canyon .8 miles roundtrip For your convenience, Map: https://www2.illinois.gov/dnr/Parks/Pages/ we have assembled a StarvedRock.aspx list of activities that Scavenger Hunt - Page 11 can be incorporated Tour the Visitor Center exhibits into the classroom and In the Shadow of the Rock film—15 minutes daily lesson plans in conjunction with a POST-VISIT ACTIVITIES field trip to Starved Rock State Park. • Write your own Starved Rock Story: “My Day at Starved Rock State Park” Template Page 12 2 2 Wigwam Construction: Engineering 3 The Kaskaskia People lived in villages of small round houses called wigwams. What you need: 6 for each student or pair of (buddy up) Square pieces of cardboard box for each student/pair Circle to trace/tree bark sheets Instructions: Have students trace the circle template onto their square piece of cardboard.
    [Show full text]
  • Turtle Monitoring Turtle Notching Image of Turtle Trap
    Monitoring Turtles at Nygren Wetland Preserve India John ’12, Beloit College Sustainability Fellows Program [1,2] Summer 2010 Blanding’s Turtle Painted Turtle [1,2] Emydoidea blandingii Chrysemys picta Turtle Monitoring Size: 6-10 inch carapace Habitat: Shallow marshy areas •Four traps made by volunteers set throughout the with abundant submerged preserve vegetation; semi-terrestrial •Traps were checked 3-4 times a week Temperament: Docile and shy •Traps were moved frequently throughout the property Status: State Threatened Species, •Captured turtles were: despite reported sightings, no • weighed Blanding’s turtles have been • measured (plastron and carapace length and width) captured or recorded at Nygren. Plastron (bottom of shell) • notched (Painted Turtles only) of Midland Painted Turtle • released Blanding’s Turtle in Boone County Midland Painted Turtle Photo by: India John Photo by Courtney Schultz Photo by Courtney Schultz Two subspecies in Wisconsin: [1,2] Midland Painted ( Chrysemys picta marginata ) Softshell Turtle Western Painted ( Chrysemys picta bellii ). Apalone Size: 4-8 inch carapace Image Habitat: Marshes and ponds, with dense aquatic vegetation of Temperament: Docile Status: Common; the Western Painted is the turtle most abundant turtle in Wisconsin. Plastron of a Western trap Painted Turtle Photo by India John Snapping Turtle [1,2] Carapace (top of shell) of a Interns India John and Scott Kruger making turtle traps Eastern Spiny Softshell turtle Smooth Softshell turtle Chelydra serpentina Photo by Courtney Schultz Photo by Greg Keilback Photo by India John Two species: Eastern Spiny Softshell (Apalone spinifera ), Turtle Notching Smooth Softshell ( Apalone muticus ) Size: Spiny - carapace: fem. 7 - 18 in., Marked individual turtles by notching the m.
    [Show full text]
  • RELATIVE ABUNDANCE of SPINEY SOFTSHELL TURTLES (Apalone Spinifera) on the MISSOURI and YELLOWSTONE RIVERS in MONTANA FINAL REPOR
    RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF SPINEY SOFTSHELL TURTLES (Apalone spinifera) ON THE MISSOURI AND YELLOWSTONE RIVERS IN MONTANA FINAL REPORT Arnold R. Dood, Brad Schmitz, Vic Riggs, Nate McClenning, Matt Jeager, Dave Fuller, Ryan Rauscher, Steve Leathe, Dave Moore, JoAnn Dullum, John Ensign, Scott Story, Mike Backes Abstract In 2003, the Missouri River Natural Resources Committee (MRNRC) Wildlife Section advocated developing a survey for the relative abundance of softshell turtles (Apalone sp.) on the Missouri River system. Softshell turtles were selected because they occur throughout the system and there was some information suggesting that they may have been impacted by system operations. As a common riverine species, there were possibilities that softshell turtles may have been impacted because of the timing, level, and temperature of river flows as well as by dam construction and bank stabilization. In addition, there were reports from other areas in the species range that they may be especially sensitive to human disturbance. From 2004 through 2008, State and Federal agencies and Pacific Power and Light in Montana sampled the Missouri River from Great Falls, MT, to the confluence of the Missouri and Yellowstone (except Fort Peck Reservoir) as well as they Yellowstone River from above Billings to the confluence. Sampling consisted of setting turtle traps every two river miles and checking for three days. Turtles captured were measured, marked, and released. Results of the sampling efforts indicated high relative densities above Fort Peck Reservoir and variable densities on the Yellowstone. No spiny softshells were found below Fort Peck or on the Yellowstone below Sidney, MT. Possible reasons are presented and recommendations for future program direction as well as potential system modifications to benefit this species are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 100/Tuesday, May 24, 2016/Rules
    32664 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 100 / Tuesday, May 24, 2016 / Rules and Regulations Date certain Federal assist- State and location Community Effective date authorization/cancellation of Current effective ance no longer No. sale of flood insurance in community map date available in SFHAs Bonita, Village of, Morehouse Parish ........... 220316 April 3, 1997, Emerg; April 1, 2007, Reg; ......do ............... Do. July 6, 2016, Susp. Collinston, Village of, Morehouse Parish ..... 220399 June 17, 1991, Emerg; N/A, Reg; July 6, ......do ............... Do. 2016, Susp. Mer Rouge, Village of, Morehouse Parish ... 220128 May 3, 1973, Emerg; June 27, 1978, Reg; ......do ............... Do. July 6, 2016, Susp. Morehouse Parish, Unincorporated Areas ... 220367 April 14, 1983, Emerg; October 15, 1985, ......do ............... Do. Reg; July 6, 2016, Susp. New Mexico: Dona Ana County, Unincor- 350012 January 19, 1976, Emerg; September 27, ......do ............... Do. porated Areas. 1991, Reg; July 6, 2016, Susp. Hatch, Village of, Dona Ana County ............ 350013 December 10, 1974, Emerg; January 3, ......do ............... Do. 1986, Reg; July 6, 2016, Susp. Las Cruces, City of, Dona Ana County ........ 355332 July 24, 1970, Emerg; June 11, 1971, Reg; ......do ............... Do. July 6, 2016, Susp. Mesilla, Town of, Dona Ana County ............. 350113 March 7, 1975, Emerg; May 28, 1985, Reg; ......do ............... Do. July 6, 2016, Susp. Sunland Park, City of, Dona Ana County ..... 350147 N/A, Emerg; November 8, 2006, Reg; July ......do ............... Do. 6, 2016, Susp. *.....do = Ditto. Code for reading third column: Emerg. —Emergency; Reg. —Regular; Susp. —Suspension. Dated: May 12, 2016. species (including their subspecies, in September 2010, to discuss the Michael M.
    [Show full text]
  • A Field Guide to South Dakota Turtles
    A Field Guide to SOUTH DAKOTA TURTLES EC919 South Dakota State University | Cooperative Extension Service | USDA U.S. Geological Survey | South Dakota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit South Dakota Department of Game, Fish & Parks This publication may be cited as: Bandas, Sarah J., and Kenneth F. Higgins. 2004. Field Guide to South Dakota Turtles. SDCES EC 919. Brookings: South Dakota State University. Copies may be obtained from: Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries Sciences South Dakota State University Box 2140B, NPBL Brookings SD 57007-1696 South Dakota Dept of Game, Fish & Parks 523 E. Capitol, Foss Bldg Pierre SD 57501 SDSU Bulletin Room ACC Box 2231 Brookings, SD 57007 (605) 688–4187 A Field Guide to SOUTH DAKOTA TURTLES EC919 South Dakota State University | Cooperative Extension Service | USDA U.S. Geological Survey | South Dakota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit South Dakota Department of Game, Fish & Parks Sarah J. Bandas Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences South Dakota State University NPB Box 2140B Brookings, SD 57007 Kenneth F. Higgins U.S. Geological Survey South Dakota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit South Dakota State University NPB Box 2140B Brookings, SD 57007 Contents 2 Introduction . .3 Status of South Dakota turtles . .3 Fossil record and evolution . .4 General turtle information . .4 Taxonomy of South Dakota turtles . .9 Capturing techniques . .10 Turtle handling . .10 Turtle habitats . .13 Western Painted Turtle (Chrysemys picta bellii) . .15 Snapping Turtle (Chelydra serpentina) . .17 Spiny Softshell Turtle (Apalone spinifera) . .19 Smooth Softshell Turtle (Apalone mutica) . .23 False Map Turtle (Graptemys pseudogeographica) . .25 Western Ornate Box Turtle (Terrapene ornata ornata) .
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 210/Thursday, October 30, 2014
    Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 210 / Thursday, October 30, 2014 / Proposed Rules 64553 incremental NGCC generation identified generation levels. Together, the same information sources and presented under building block 2 (given that under approach in the proposal and the in the same format as the 2012 dataset the proposal, generation from building alternative approach in this document used for the June 2014 proposed rule. block 2 was assumed to reduce carbon reflect a range of possible emission rate We are also making these data available intensity by replacing generation from impacts that could be expected through at: http://www2.epa.gov/ 2012 levels). The rationale for this the application of the incremental RE cleanpowerplan/. approach would be that the BSER for all and EE in the state goal calculation. The Dated: October 27, 2014. fossil generation includes replacing that EPA is seeking comment on which Janet G. McCabe, generation with incremental RE and EE. approach better reflects the BSER. At Moreover, this approach acknowledges the same time, we note that the Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Air and Radiation. that, taken by itself, such incremental alternative state goal formula generation would not necessarily approaches listed here may raise a [FR Doc. 2014–25845 Filed 10–29–14; 8:45 am] replace the highest-emitting generation, number of additional considerations. BILLING CODE 6560–50–P but would likely replace a mix of These approaches, for example, would existing fossil generating technologies. increase the collective stringency of the b. Prioritize replacement of historical state goals, which would likely increase DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR fossil steam generation.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic American Indian Tribes of Ohio 1654-1843
    Historic American Indian Tribes of Ohio 1654-1843 Ohio Historical Society www.ohiohistory.org $4.00 TABLE OF CONTENTS Historical Background 03 Trails and Settlements 03 Shelters and Dwellings 04 Clothing and Dress 07 Arts and Crafts 08 Religions 09 Medicine 10 Agriculture, Hunting, and Fishing 11 The Fur Trade 12 Five Major Tribes of Ohio 13 Adapting Each Other’s Ways 16 Removal of the American Indian 18 Ohio Historical Society Indian Sites 20 Ohio Historical Marker Sites 20 Timeline 32 Glossary 36 The Ohio Historical Society 1982 Velma Avenue Columbus, OH 43211 2 Ohio Historical Society www.ohiohistory.org Historic American Indian Tribes of Ohio HISTORICAL BACKGROUND In Ohio, the last of the prehistoric Indians, the Erie and the Fort Ancient people, were destroyed or driven away by the Iroquois about 1655. Some ethnologists believe the Shawnee descended from the Fort Ancient people. The Shawnees were wanderers, who lived in many places in the south. They became associated closely with the Delaware in Ohio and Pennsylvania. Able fighters, the Shawnees stubbornly resisted white pressures until the Treaty of Greene Ville in 1795. At the time of the arrival of the European explorers on the shores of the North American continent, the American Indians were living in a network of highly developed cultures. Each group lived in similar housing, wore similar clothing, ate similar food, and enjoyed similar tribal life. In the geographical northeastern part of North America, the principal American Indian tribes were: Abittibi, Abenaki, Algonquin, Beothuk, Cayuga, Chippewa, Delaware, Eastern Cree, Erie, Forest Potawatomi, Huron, Iroquois, Illinois, Kickapoo, Mohicans, Maliseet, Massachusetts, Menominee, Miami, Micmac, Mississauga, Mohawk, Montagnais, Munsee, Muskekowug, Nanticoke, Narragansett, Naskapi, Neutral, Nipissing, Ojibwa, Oneida, Onondaga, Ottawa, Passamaquoddy, Penobscot, Peoria, Pequot, Piankashaw, Prairie Potawatomi, Sauk-Fox, Seneca, Susquehanna, Swamp-Cree, Tuscarora, Winnebago, and Wyandot.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Mississippi River Basin Association Ppa N I81i1uppi Jl.I:Ru C1 ~1.D
    Mississippi River UMR HAB Response Basin Association Resource Manual LAUREN SALVATO GREAT PLAINS AND MIDWEST HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOMS CONFERENCE FEBRUARY 5, 2020 CWAReach #6 c~~::::hD#~m 11 - Lock t •m 13 Lock and Dam 13 -Iowa River -.z-- -- CWA Reach #8 \ Lower Impounded Iowa River -Des Moines River CWAReach #9 Des Moines Rive r - Lock and DamI 21 CWA Reach #10 \ Lock and Dam 21 - Cuivre River\ CWA Reach #11 ( Cuivre River -Missouri River CWA Reach #12 ) Open River--_____J Missouri River - Kaskaskia River ,-'----~------- .? CWA Reach #13 Legend Kaskaskia River - Ohio River - Reach Boundaries -:'c- ape G.irar ds eau Floodplain Reaches ~ Cairo.) -- Upper Impounded - Lower Impounded 0 50 100 200 Miles About UMRBA • Regional interstate organization formed in 1981 by the Governors of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Iowa, and Missouri • Facilitate dialogue and cooperative action regarding water and related land resource issues on behalf of the five basin states Photo credit: US FWS UMRBA Issue Areas Ecosystem Commercial Health Navigation Clean Hazardous Water Spills Aquatic Flooding Nuisance Species Photo credit: MVS Flickr UMRBA Water Quality Groups Water Quality Executive Committee • Policy making body • Influences water quality areas of focus Water Quality Task Force • Technical body • Makes recommendations to the Executive Committee and takes on new directives Photo: USFWS Refuge Flicker Mississippi River Harmful Algal Bloom HABs Response Resource Manuall • Communication List • Response Tools and Resources • Maps and Spatial References • Communication Tools • Algae/Toxin Guidelines • Capacities Compilation January 2020 http://umrba.org/wq/umr-hab-response- resource-manual.pdf Upper Mississippi River Basin Association ppa N i81i1uppi Jl.i:ru C1_~1.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2013–0052]
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 05/24/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-11201, and on FDsys.gov Billing Code 4333–15 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 23 [Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2013–0052] RIN 1018–AZ53 Inclusion of Four Native U.S. Freshwater Turtle Species in Appendix III of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), are listing the common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina), Florida softshell turtle (Apalone ferox), smooth softshell turtle (Apalone mutica), and spiny softshell turtle (Apalone spinifera) in Appendix 1 III of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES or Convention), including live and dead whole specimens, and all readily recognizable parts, products, and derivatives. Listing these four native U.S. freshwater turtle species (including their subspecies, except Apalone spinifera atra, which is already included in Appendix I of CITES) in Appendix III of CITES is necessary to allow us to adequately monitor international trade in these species; to determine whether exports are occurring legally, with respect to State and Federal law; and to determine whether further measures under CITES or other laws are required to conserve these species and their subspecies. DATES: This listing is effective [INSERT DATE 180 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: You may obtain information about permits for international trade in these species and their subspecies by contacting the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Master List of Native Groups
    Help Pages to Native Catholic Record Guides See User Guide for help on interpreting entries MASTER LIST OF NATIVE AMERICAN GROUPS new 2003, rev. 2006-2008 These groups indigenous to the Americas are documented in the Catholic- related archival records surveyed by Marquette University and/or found in the archival records at Marquette University. These terms are Library of Congress subject headings that are cultural and linguistic terms and not necessarily the legal names of tribes and communities. Brackets denote alternative and/ or additional community, ethnographic, historic, and legal names whereas parentheses denote past and present homeland and community locations noted in the records. Abenaki Indians (Maine) Ahtena Indians [Athapascan] (Alaksa) Alabamu Indians [Alabama] (Louisiana, Texas) Alsea Indians (Oregon) Apache Indians [Athapascan, Chiricahua, Cibecue, Jicarilla, Mescalero, White Mountain] (Arizona, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas) Apalachee Indians (Florida, Louisiana) Arapaho Indians (Oklahoma, Wyoming) Arickara Indians (North Dakota) Assiniboine Indians (Montana) Atsina Indians [Gros Ventre] (Montana) Bannock Indians (Idaho) Brulé Indians [Sicangu, Dakota, Lakota, Teton Sioux] (South Dakota) Caddo Indians [Adai, Hasinai] (Oklahoma, Texas) Cahuilla Indians (California) Catawba Indians (North Carolina) Cayuga Indians [Iroquois, Iroquoian] (Oklahoma) Cayuse Indians (Oregon) Chelan Indians [Colville Confederated] (Washington) Cherokee Indians (Kansas?, North Carolina, Oklahoma) Cheyenne Indians (Montana, Oklahoma) Chickasaw Indians
    [Show full text]