Turtles of the World, 2010 Update: Annotated Checklist of Taxonomy, Synonymy, Distribution, and Conservation Status

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Turtles of the World, 2010 Update: Annotated Checklist of Taxonomy, Synonymy, Distribution, and Conservation Status Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation ProjectTurtles of the IUCN/SSC of the World Tortoise – 2010and Freshwater Checklist Turtle Specialist Group 000.85 A.G.J. Rhodin, P.C.H. Pritchard, P.P. van Dijk, R.A. Saumure, K.A. Buhlmann, J.B. Iverson, and R.A. Mittermeier, Eds. Chelonian Research Monographs (ISSN 1088-7105) No. 5, doi:10.3854/crm.5.000.checklist.v3.2010 © 2010 by Chelonian Research Foundation • Published 14 December 2010 Turtles of the World, 2010 Update: Annotated Checklist of Taxonomy, Synonymy, Distribution, and Conservation Status TUR T LE TAXONOMY WORKING GROUP * *Authorship of this article is by this working group of the IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group, which for the purposes of this document consisted of the following contributors: ANDERS G.J. RHODIN 1, PE T ER PAUL VAN DI J K 2, JOHN B. IVERSON 3, AND H. BRADLEY SHAFFER 4 1Chair, IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group, Chelonian Research Foundation, 168 Goodrich St., Lunenburg, Massachusetts 01462 USA [[email protected]]; 2Deputy Chair, IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group, Conservation International, 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 500, Arlington, Virginia 22202 USA [[email protected]]; 3Department of Biology, Earlham College, Richmond, Indiana 47374 USA [[email protected]]; 4Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, California 95616 USA [[email protected]] AB S T RAC T . – This is our fourth annual compilation of an annotated checklist of all recognized and named taxa of the world’s modern chelonian fauna, documenting recent changes and controversies in nomenclature, and including all primary synonyms, updated from our previous three checklists (Turtle Taxonomy Working Group [2007b, 2009], Rhodin et al. [2008]). This year we have expanded the checklist into a comprehensive listing of important aspects of taxonomy, names, distribution, and conservation status of all turtles and tortoises of the world. We strive to record the most recent justified taxonomic assignment of terminal taxa in a hierarchical framework, providing annotations as to whether or not we accept recently proposed changes, and for some taxonomic placements we show alternative arrangements. We provide common English names and detailed distributional data for all taxa, listing occurrence by countries and many smaller political or geo- graphic subunits (states or regions), including indications of native, extirpated, and introduced (modern or prehistoric) populations. We also include current and updated draft IUCN Red List status determinations for all turtles, as well as CITES listings. The diversity of turtles and tortoises in the world that have existed in modern times (since 1500 AD), and currently generally recognized as distinct and included on this checklist, now consists of 328 species. Of these, 56 are polytypic, representing 124 additional recognized subspecies, or 452 total taxa of modern turtles and tortoises. Of these, 8 species and 2 subspecies, or 10 taxa, have gone extinct. As of the current 2010 IUCN Red List, 129 turtle species (62.3% of 207 species listed, 39.3% of all species) are officially regarded as globally Threatened (Critically Endangered, Endangered, or Vulnerable). We now record ad- ditional draft Red List evaluations of the 121 previously “unevaluated” species, and updated draft re-evaluations of 77 previously listed species, allowing us to evaluate the overall current threat levels for all turtles and tortoises. Of the 328 total species of turtles and tortoises, 156 (47.6%) are Threatened, with 90 (27.4%) Critically Endangered or Endangered. If we adjust for predicted threat rates of Data Deficient species, then 54% of all turtles are Threatened. If we include Extinct in the Wild and Extinct species, then 50.3% of all modern turtles and tortoises are either already extinct or threatened with extinction. Turtles are among the most endangered of any of the major groups of vertebrates, more than birds, mammals, cartilaginous fishes, or amphibians. KEY W ORDS . – Reptilia, Testudines, turtle, tortoise, chelonian, taxonomy, nomenclature, genera, species, subspecies, primary synonyms, suprageneric hierarchy, systematics, common names, distribution, introduced species, conservation status, IUCN Red List, CITES, threatened species, extinction The diversity of all turtles and tortoises (chelonians) checklist), leaving us currently with 320 species and 122 in the world that have existed in modern times (since 1500 additional subspecies, or 442 total taxa of living turtles AD), and currently generally recognized as distinct by spe- and tortoises. Of all living turtle taxa, 7 species are marine cialists in turtle taxonomy and systematics, consists of ap- turtles, leaving 313 species and 435 total taxa of modern proximately 328 species, of which 56 are polytypic, with living freshwater and terrestrial turtles and tortoises. 124 additional recognized subspecies, or 452 total taxa of The 452 total turtle and tortoise taxa recognized on this modern chelonians. Of these, 8 species plus 2 subspecies, checklist are based on a listed synonymy of 1203 separate or 10 total taxa, of tortoises and freshwater turtles have named turtle and tortoise species and subspecies, counting become extinct since 1500 AD (see table at the end of the both new descriptions and nomina nova replacement names, 000.86 Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises • Chelonian Research Monographs, No. 5 but not nomina nuda or ex errore typographical error groupings, from “Family” to Order to various supra-ordi- names. In this checklist we present a full taxonomic listing nal categories. Many were utilized primarily for including of all recognized taxa, including synonymized names, and various fossil turtle-like ancestors in an expanded concept provide annotations concerning recently described new of turtles, including some rank-free Phylocode names. The taxa, nomenclatural and taxonomic updates, and significant names we list in other infra-ordinal suprageneric categories taxon-related controversies or developments. are not always strict synonyms either, as based on nomen- As there is always some disagreement among experts clatural acceptability or availability of the utilized group as to which taxa are distinct and valid, and at what system- name, but instead provide a partial historical record for atic level or rank (species or subspecies), these numbers names previously used for the same or similar grouping. are variable depending on the authorities presenting their Our formatting in terms of the use of standardized end- data or interpretations. For prior discussions and listings of ings and attribution of authorship of names of some groups all recognized modern turtle taxa, with extensive annota- (e.g., Trionychia, Kinosternoidea) does not always follow tions regarding areas of recent taxonomic change, insta- a strict application of the ICZN, being more of a partial bility, or controversy, see the previous publications by the use and deference to the Phylocode for these suprafamilial Turtle Taxonomy Working Group (TTWG 2007a,b, 2009), categories. Rhodin et al. (2008), and the turtle checklist produced for The list includes all currently recognized named taxa CITES by Fritz and Havas (2007). The latter is also an ex- (species and subspecies) of modern turtles (extant after cellent source for full synonymies, including nomina nuda, 1500 AD). By “currently recognized” we mean those taxa ex errore names, and type localities. that have not been demonstrably refuted or justifiably syn- The Turtle Taxonomy Working Group (TTWG) func- onymized in published literature, or whose resurrection is tions under the auspices of the IUCN/SSC Tortoise and yet to receive acceptance. We have attempted to describe Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group (TFTSG), which oper- all recent published taxonomic recommendations in our ates under the umbrella of the IUCN (International Union annotations, even though we have not included all pro- for Conservation of Nature) and its Species Survival Com- posed changes in the checklist. mission (SSC). Our checklist of modern turtle taxa was Since there are sometimes also different interpretations first compiled by the TTWG (2007b), and has since been for some genera and polytypic species as to which names updated annually to reflect more recent changes as required are valid and whether to lump or split the contained taxa, by subsequent publications with taxonomic novelties or we occasionally list recent alternative name usages. Our proposed changes, as well as adding primary synonyms most important criterion for accepting proposed changes is for all recognized taxa (Rhodin et al. 2008; TTWG 2009). that they be accompanied by adequate data and sound ar- This checklist is the fourth installment in this series and is guments justifying the taxonomic revision. Consequently, current through 1 December 2010. some proposed taxonomic changes from lists or publica- This list includes all primary description names, syn- tions with unsupported or untested revisions have not been onyms, and nomina nova that we are aware of, but excludes incorporated. We also list and annotate recent systematic nomina nuda (with a few exceptions), typographical ex er- papers that do not necessarily commit nomenclatural or rore names, and subsequent usage and new combination taxonomic acts, but that present data on phylogenetic or names. Original and synonymized taxon names
Recommended publications
  • 13914444D46c0aa91d02e31218
    2 Breeding of wild and some domestic animals at regional zoological institutions in 2013 3 РЫБЫ P I S C E S ВОББЕЛОНГООБРАЗНЫЕ ORECTOLOBIFORMES Сем. Азиатские кошачьи акулы (Бамбуковые акулы) – Hemiscyllidae Коричневополосая бамбуковая акула – Chiloscyllium punctatum Brownbanded bambooshark IUCN (NT) Sevastopol 20 ХВОСТОКОЛООБРАЗНЫЕ DASYATIFORMES Сем. Речные хвостоколы – Potamotrygonidae Глазчатый хвостокол (Моторо) – Potamotrygon motoro IUCN (DD) Ocellate river stingray Sevastopol - ? КАРПООБРАЗНЫЕ CYPRINIFORMES Сем. Цитариновые – Citharinidae Серебристый дистиход – Distichodusaffinis (noboli) Silver distichodus Novosibirsk 40 Сем. Пираньевые – Serrasalmidae Серебристый метиннис – Metynnis argenteus Silver dollar Yaroslavl 10 Обыкновенный метиннис – Metynnis schreitmuelleri (hypsauchen) Plainsilver dollar Nikolaev 4; Novosibirsk 100; Kharkov 20 Пятнистый метиннис – Metynnis maculatus Spotted metynnis Novosibirsk 50 Пиранья Наттерера – Serrasalmus nattereri Red piranha Novosibirsk 80; Kharkov 30 4 Сем. Харацидовые – Characidae Красноплавничный афиохаракс – Aphyocharax anisitsi (rubripinnis) Bloodfin tetra Киев 5; Perm 10 Парагвайский афиохаракс – Aphyocharax paraquayensis Whitespot tetra Perm 11 Рубиновый афиохаракс Рэтбина – Aphyocharax rathbuni Redflank bloodfin Perm 10 Эквадорская тетра – Astyanax sp. Tetra Perm 17 Слепая рыбка – Astyanax fasciatus mexicanus (Anoptichthys jordani) Mexican tetra Kharkov 10 Рублик-монетка – Ctenobrycon spilurus (+ С. spilurusvar. albino) Silver tetra Kharkov 20 Тернеция (Траурная тетра) – Gymnocorymbus
    [Show full text]
  • Life History Account for Western Pond Turtle
    California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Interagency Wildlife Task Group WESTERN POND TURTLE Actinemys marmorata Family: EMYDIDAE Order: TESTUDINES Class: REPTILIA R004 Written by: S. Morey Reviewed by: T. Papenfuss Edited by: R. Duke Updated by: CWHR Program Staff, March 2000 DISTRIBUTION, ABUNDANCE, AND SEASONALITY The western pond turtle is uncommon to common in suitable aquatic habitat throughout California, west of the Sierra-Cascade crest and absent from desert regions, except in the Mojave Desert along the Mojave River and its tributaries. Elevation range extends from near sea level to 1430 m (4690 ft) (Jennings and Hayes 1994). Associated with permanent or nearly permanent water in a wide variety of habitat types. SPECIFIC HABITAT REQUIREMENTS Feeding: This species is considered omnivorous. Aquatic plant material, including pond lilies, beetles and a variety of aquatic invertebrates as well as fishes, frogs, and even carrion have been reported among their food (Stebbins 1972, Nussbaum et al. 1983). Cover: Pond turtles require basking sites such as partially submerged logs, rocks, mats of floating vegetation, or open mud banks. Turtles slip from basking sites to underwater retreats at the approach of humans or potential predators. Hibernation in colder areas is passed underwater in bottom mud. Reproduction: Storer (1930) suggested that two distinct habitats may be used for oviposition. Along large slow-moving streams, eggs are deposited in nests constructed in sandy banks. Along foothill streams, females may climb hillsides, sometimes moving considerable distances to find a suitable nest site. Nussbaum et al. (1983) reports a nest in a clover field 100 m (325 ft) from water.
    [Show full text]
  • Competing Generic Concepts for Blanding's, Pacific and European
    Zootaxa 2791: 41–53 (2011) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2011 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Competing generic concepts for Blanding’s, Pacific and European pond turtles (Emydoidea, Actinemys and Emys)—Which is best? UWE FRITZ1,3, CHRISTIAN SCHMIDT1 & CARL H. ERNST2 1Museum of Zoology, Senckenberg Dresden, A. B. Meyer Building, D-01109 Dresden, Germany 2Division of Amphibians and Reptiles, MRC 162, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, Washington, D.C. 20013-7012, USA 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We review competing taxonomic classifications and hypotheses for the phylogeny of emydine turtles. The formerly rec- ognized genus Clemmys sensu lato clearly is paraphyletic. Two of its former species, now Glyptemys insculpta and G. muhlenbergii, constitute a well-supported basal clade within the Emydinae. However, the phylogenetic position of the oth- er two species traditionally placed in Clemmys remains controversial. Mitochondrial data suggest a clade embracing Actinemys (formerly Clemmys) marmorata, Emydoidea and Emys and as its sister either another clade (Clemmys guttata + Terrapene) or Terrapene alone. In contrast, nuclear genomic data yield conflicting results, depending on which genes are used. Either Clemmys guttata is revealed as sister to ((Emydoidea + Emys) + Actinemys) + Terrapene or Clemmys gut- tata is sister to Actinemys marmorata and these two species together are the sister group of (Emydoidea + Emys); Terra- pene appears then as sister to (Actinemys marmorata + Clemmys guttata) + (Emydoidea + Emys). The contradictory branching patterns depending from the selected loci are suggestive of lineage sorting problems. Ignoring the unclear phy- logenetic position of Actinemys marmorata, one recently proposed classification scheme placed Actinemys marmorata, Emydoidea blandingii, Emys orbicularis, and Emys trinacris in one genus (Emys), while another classification scheme treats Actinemys, Emydoidea, and Emys as distinct genera.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Variation in the Matamata Turtle, Chelus Fimbriatus, with Observations on Its Shell Morphology and Morphometry
    n*entilkilt ilil Biok,gr', 1995. l(-l):19: 1995 by CheloninD Research Foundltion Geographic Variation in the Matamata Turtle, Chelus fimbriatus, with Observations on its Shell Morphology and Morphometry MlncBLo R. SANcnnz-Vu,urcnAr, PnrER C.H. PnrrcHARD:, ArrnEro P.rorrLLo-r, aNn Onan J. LINlnBs3 tDepartment of Biological Anthropolog-,- and Anatomy, Duke lJniversin' Medical Cetter. Box 3170, Dtu'hcun, North Carolina277l0 USA IFat 919-684-8034]; 2Florida Audubotr Societ-t, 460 High,n;a,- 436, Suite 200, Casselberry, Florida 32707 USA: iDepartanento de Esttdios Anbientales, llniyersitlad Sinzrin Bolltnt", Caracas ]O80-A, APDO 89OOO l/enerte\a Ansrucr. - A sample of 126 specimens of Chelusftmbriatus was examined for geographic variation and morphology of the shell. A high degree of variation was found in the plastral formula and in the shape and size of the intergular scute. This study suggests that the Amazon population of matamatas is different from the Orinoco population in the following characters: shape ofthe carapace, plastral pigmentation, and coloration on the underside of the neck. Additionatly, a preliminary analysis indicates that the two populations could be separated on the basis of the allometric growth of the carapace in relation to the plastron. Kry Wonus. - Reptilia; Testudinesl Chelidae; Chelus fimbriatus; turtle; geographic variationl allometryl sexual dimorphism; morphology; morphometryl osteology; South America 'Ihe matamata turtle (Chelus fimbricttus) inhabits the scute morpholo..ey. Measured characters (in all cases straight- Amazon, Oyapoque. Essequibo. and Orinoco river systems line) were: maximum carapace len.-uth (CL). cArapace width of northern South America (Iverson. 1986). Despite a mod- at the ler,'el of the sixth marginal scute (CW).
    [Show full text]
  • USF Board of Trustees ( March 7, 2013)
    Agenda item: (to be completed by Board staff) USF Board of Trustees ( March 7, 2013) Issue: Proposed Ph.D. in Integrative Biology ________________________________________________________________ Proposed action: New Degree Program Approval ________________________________________________________________ Background information: This application for a new Ph.D is driven by a recent reorganization of the Department of Biology. The reorganization began in 2006 and was completed in 2009. The reorganization of the Department of Biology, in part, reflected the enormity of the biological sciences, and in part, different research perspectives and directions taken by the faculty in each of the respective areas of biology. Part of the reorganization was to replace the original Ph.D. in Biology with two new doctoral degrees that better serve the needs of the State and our current graduate students by enabling greater focus of the research performed to earn the Ph.D. The well-established and highly productive faculty attracts students to the Tampa Campus from all over the United States as well as from foreign countries. The resources to support the two Ph.D. programs have already been established in the Department of Biology and are sufficient to support the two new degree programs. The reorganization created two new departments; the Department of Cell Biology, Microbiology, and Molecular Biology (CMMB) and the Department of Integrative Biology (IB). This proposal addresses the creation of a new Ph.D., in Integrative Biology offered by the Department of Integrative Biology (CIP Code 26.1399). The name of the Department, Integrative Biology, reflects the belief that the study of biological processes and systems can best be accomplished by the incorporation of numerous integrated approaches Strategic Goal(s) Item Supports: The proposed program directly supports the following: Goal 1 and Goal 2 Workgroup Review: ACE March 7, 2013 Supporting Documentation: See Complete Proposal below Prepared by: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • (Testudines: Geoemydidae) from the Azov Sea Coast in the Crimea
    Official journal website: Amphibian & Reptile Conservation amphibian-reptile-conservation.org 10(2) [General Section]: 27–29 (e129). Short Communication A record of the Balkan Stripe-necked Terrapin, Mauremys rivulata (Testudines: Geoemydidae) from the Azov Sea Coast in the Crimea 1Oleg V. Kukushkin and 2Daniel Jablonski 1Department of Herpetology, Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Emb. 1, 199034 Saint Pe- tersburg, RUSSIA 2Department of Zoology, Comenius University in Bratislava, Mlynská dolina, Ilkovičova 6, 842 15 Bratislava, SLOVAKIA Keywords. Mauremys rivulata, first record, Crimea, Kerch peninsula, Azov Sea, overseas dispersal, occasional relocation Citation: Kukushkin O V, Jablonski D. 2016. A record of the Balkan Stripe-necked Terrapin, Mauremys rivulata (Testudines: Geomydidae) from the Azov Sea Coast in Crimea. Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 10(2) [General Section]: 27–29 (e129). Copyright: © 2016 Kukushkin and Jablonski. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercialNoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use for non-commercial and education purposes only, in any medium, provided the original author and the official and authorized publication sources are recognized and properly credited. The official and authorized publication credit sources, which will be duly enforced, are as follows: official journal titleAmphibian & Reptile Conservation; official journal website <amphibian-reptile-conservation.org>. Received: 03 September 2016; Accepted: 7 November 2016; Published: 30 November 2016 The Crimean herpetofauna comprises such true Eastern- limestone rocks on the abrasion-accumulative sea coast Mediterranean species as Mediodactylus kotschyi and below the lake (Fig. 1B). In general, the locality remains Zamenis situla (Sillero et al. 2014). The occurrence of typical of habitats of M.
    [Show full text]
  • Aggressive Interactions Among Male Cane Turtles Vijayachelys Silvatica (HENDERSON, 1912)
    All_Short_Notes_SHORT_NOTE.qxd 15.01.2013 15:21 Seite 9 SHORT NOTE HERPETOZOA 25 (3/4) Wien, 30. Jänner 2013 SHORT NOTE 159 Aggressive interactions among male cane Turtles Vijayachelys silvatica (HENDERSON, 1912) Vijayachelys silvatica (HENDERSON, 1912) is a monotypic chelonian endemic to the Western Ghats (MOll et al. 1986; PRA- ScHAG et al. 2006). it attains a maximum straight carapace length (Scl) of 170 mm (WHiTAkER & JAGANATHAN 2009) and is thus one of the smallest terrestrial geoemy- did turtles. The species is omnivorous, feeding on fruits, leaves, molluscs, beetles and millipedes (MOll et al. 1986; DEEPAk et al. 2009; vASUDEvAN et al. 2010). Maxi - mum straight carapace length is not signifi- cantly different between males and females (WHiTAkER & JAGANATHAN 2009). How - ever, the species exhibits a sexual shell shape dimorphism, with females attaining bigger carapace width, shell height, plastron length and weight than males (WHiTAkER & JAGANATHAN 2009). in addition, the species is sexually dichromatic, with males showing different combinations of bright red, yellow, pink and black colors on the head, whereas females are clay to cinnamon rufous with or without a pink stripe on the head (MOll et al. 1986; DEE PAk & vASUDEvAN 2009). Mating in cochin Forest cane Turtles is reported to happen between June and November (APPUkUTTAN 1991; WHiTAkER & JAGANATHAN 2009). Aggressive interac- tion among male cane Turtles during this period is a known phenomenon (MOll et al. 1986), but the potential consequence to the inferior rival of losing the nuchal scute is reported here for the first time and allows for inferences on the size at sexual maturity.
    [Show full text]
  • Dispersal in the Coahuilan Box Turtle
    1 Running title: Dispersal in the Coahuilan box turtle In press, Molecular Ecology 2 3 4 CONTRASTING DEMOGRAPHIC AND GENETIC ESTIMATES OF DISPERSAL IN THE 5 6 ENDANGERED COAHUILAN BOX TURTLE: A CONTEMPORARY APPROACH TO 7 8 CONSERVATION 9 10 Jennifer G. Howeth1,4, Suzanne E. McGaugh2, Dean A. Hendrickson1,3 11 12 MEC-08-0399 Final 13 1 Section of Integrative Biology 14 University of Texas at Austin 15 1 University Station C0930 16 Austin, Texas 78712 17 Phone: 512 475 8669 18 Fax: 512 471 3878 19 20 2 Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology 21 Iowa State University 22 251 Bessey Hall 23 Ames, Iowa 50011 24 25 3 Texas Natural Science Center, Texas Natural History Collection 26 University of Texas at Austin 27 PRC 176 / R4000 28 10100 Burnet Road 29 Austin, Texas 78758 30 31 4 Corresponding author: [email protected] 32 Abstract: 249 / 250 words 33 Main text: 7,641 / 8,000 words 34 Figures: 5; Supplementary Figures: 2 35 Tables: 3; Supplementary Tables: 2 36 37 38 Keywords: connectivity, isolation by distance, metapopulation, microsatellite, mark-recapture, 39 habitat fragmentation 40 Abstract 41 42 The evolutionary viability of an endangered species depends upon gene flow among subpopulations 43 and the degree of habitat patch connectivity. Contrasting population connectivity over ecological and 44 evolutionary timescales may provide novel insight into what maintains genetic diversity within 45 threatened species. We employed this integrative approach to evaluating dispersal in the critically 46 endangered Coahuilan box turtle (Terrapene coahuila) that inhabits isolated wetlands in the desert- 47 spring ecosystem of Cuatro Ciénegas, Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservation Biology of Tortoises
    The Conservation Biology of Tortoises Edited by Ian R. Swingland and Michael W. Klemens IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group and The Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology Occasional Papers of the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) No. 5 IUCN—The World Conservation Union IUCN Species Survival Commission Role of the SSC 3. To cooperate with the World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC) The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is IUCN's primary source of the in developing and evaluating a data base on the status of and trade in wild scientific and technical information required for the maintenance of biological flora and fauna, and to provide policy guidance to WCMC. diversity through the conservation of endangered and vulnerable species of 4. To provide advice, information, and expertise to the Secretariat of the fauna and flora, whilst recommending and promoting measures for their con- Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna servation, and for the management of other species of conservation concern. and Flora (CITES) and other international agreements affecting conser- Its objective is to mobilize action to prevent the extinction of species, sub- vation of species or biological diversity. species, and discrete populations of fauna and flora, thereby not only maintain- 5. To carry out specific tasks on behalf of the Union, including: ing biological diversity but improving the status of endangered and vulnerable species. • coordination of a programme of activities for the conservation of biological diversity within the framework of the IUCN Conserva- tion Programme. Objectives of the SSC • promotion of the maintenance of biological diversity by monitor- 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Suggested Guidelines for Reptiles and Amphibians Used in Outreach
    RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REPTILES AND AMPHIBIANS USED IN OUTREACH PROGRAMS Compiled by Diane Barber, Fort Worth Zoo Originally posted September 2003; updated February 2008 INTRODUCTION This document has been created by the AZA Reptile and Amphibian Taxon Advisory Groups to be used as a resource to aid in the development of institutional outreach programs. Within this document are lists of species that are commonly used in reptile and amphibian outreach programs. With over 12,700 species of reptiles and amphibians in existence today, it is obvious that there are numerous combinations of species that could be safely used in outreach programs. It is not the intent of these Taxon Advisory Groups to produce an all-inclusive or restrictive list of species to be used in outreach. Rather, these lists are intended for use as a resource and are some of the more common species that have been safely used in outreach programs. A few species listed as potential outreach animals have been earmarked as controversial by TAG members for various reasons. In each case, we have made an effort to explain debatable issues, enabling staff members to make informed decisions as to whether or not each animal is appropriate for their situation and the messages they wish to convey. It is hoped that during the species selection process for outreach programs, educators, collection managers, and other zoo staff work together, using TAG Outreach Guidelines, TAG Regional Collection Plans, and Institutional Collection Plans as tools. It is well understood that space in zoos is limited and it is important that outreach animals are included in institutional collection plans and incorporated into conservation programs when feasible.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Evolutionary History of the Australian Freshwater Turtles Chelodina Expansa and Chelodina Longicollis
    Recent evolutionary history of the Australian freshwater turtles Chelodina expansa and Chelodina longicollis. by Kate Meredith Hodges B.Sc. (Hons) ANU, 2004 A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Biological Sciences Department of Genetics and Evolution The University of Adelaide December, 2015 Kate Hodges with Chelodina (Macrochelodina) expansa from upper River Murray. Photo by David Thorpe, Border Mail. i Declaration I certify that this work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. In addition, I certify that no part of this work will, in the future, be used in a submission for any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution without the prior approval of the University of Adelaide and where applicable, any partner institution responsible for the joint-award of this degree. I give consent to this copy of my thesis when deposited in the University Library, being made available for loan and photocopying, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. The author acknowledges that copyright of published works contained within this thesis resides with the copyright holder(s) of those works. I also give permission for the digital version of my thesis to be made available on the web, via the University’s digital research repository, the Library catalogue and also through web search engines, unless permission has been granted by the University to restrict access for a period of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Freshwater Turtles, Which Are Usually Bigger
    Fantastic Facts Indian Part 3 Freshwater Turtles Conservation / Threat Status of Turtles Many turtles, terrapins and tortoises are threatened with extinction, that is, dying out completely. Listed below are the turtles discussed in this article (from Part 1 to 3), with their status, or prospects of survival. Name Status (Global) Assam Roofed Turtle Endangered Cochin Forest Cane Turtle Endangered Crowned River Turtle Vulnerable Rock Terrapin Near Threatened Indian Flapshell Turtle Least Concern Indian Softshell Turtle Vulnerable Indian Narrow-headed Softshell Turtle Endangered Red-crowned Roofed Turtle Critically Endangered Northern River Terrapin Critically Endangered THE CATEGORIES Critically Endangered -- This is the highest category that a species can be assigned before “extinction”. It represents a “last ditch” effort to provide a warning to wildlife agencies and governments to activate management measures to protect the species before it disappears from the face of the earth. When a species is Critically Endangered, usually its chances of living for the next 100 years are very low. Often, its chances of surviving even for 10 years are not good at all ! Endangered -- This is the second highest threat category that a species can be assigned before it becomes further threatened e.g. Critically Endangered or Extinct. When a species is Endangered, its chances of survival as a species for the next 100 years are low. Vulnerable -- The IUCN Red List defines Vulnerable as when a species is not Critically Endangered or Endangered, but is still facing a high risk of extinction in the wild. This is the first threat category for ranking a species when it has some serious problems from human-related threats.
    [Show full text]