DOCSLIB.ORG

USF Board of Trustees ( March 7, 2013)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Agenda item: (to be completed by Board staff) USF Board of Trustees ( March 7, 2013) Issue: Proposed Ph.D. in Integrative Biology ________________________________________________________________ Proposed action: New Degree Program Approval ________________________________________________________________ Background information: This application for a new Ph.D is driven by a recent reorganization of the Department of Biology. The reorganization began in 2006 and was completed in 2009. The reorganization of the Department of Biology, in part, reflected the enormity of the biological sciences, and in part, different research perspectives and directions taken by the faculty in each of the respective areas of biology. Part of the reorganization was to replace the original Ph.D. in Biology with two new doctoral degrees that better serve the needs of the State and our current graduate students by enabling greater focus of the research performed to earn the Ph.D. The well-established and highly productive faculty attracts students to the Tampa Campus from all over the United States as well as from foreign countries. The resources to support the two Ph.D. programs have already been established in the Department of Biology and are sufficient to support the two new degree programs. The reorganization created two new departments; the Department of Cell Biology, Microbiology, and Molecular Biology (CMMB) and the Department of Integrative Biology (IB). This proposal addresses the creation of a new Ph.D., in Integrative Biology offered by the Department of Integrative Biology (CIP Code 26.1399). The name of the Department, Integrative Biology, reflects the belief that the study of biological processes and systems can best be accomplished by the incorporation of numerous integrated approaches Strategic Goal(s) Item Supports: The proposed program directly supports the following: Goal 1 and Goal 2 Workgroup Review: ACE March 7, 2013 Supporting Documentation: See Complete Proposal below Prepared by: Dr. Henry R. Mushinsky ([email protected]) Phone:813-974-5218 1 Board of Governors, State University System of Florida Request to Offer a New Degree Program University of South Florida Fall 2013 University Submitting Proposal Proposed Implementation Term Integrative Biology Arts and Sciences Name of College(s) or School(s) Name of Department(s)/ Division(s) Doctor of Philosophy Integrative Biology Academic Specialty or Field Complete Name of Degree 26.1399 Proposed CIP Code The submission of this proposal constitutes a commitment by the university that, if the proposal is approved, the necessary financial resources and the criteria for establishing new programs have been met prior to the initiation of the program. Date Approved by the University Board of President Date Trustees Signature of Chair, Board of Date Vice President for Academic Date Trustees Affairs Provide headcount (HC) and full-time equivalent (FTE) student estimates of majors for Years 1 through 5. HC and FTE estimates should be identical to those in Table 1 in Appendix A. Indicate the program costs for the first and the fifth years of implementation as shown in the appropriate columns in Table 2 in Appendix A. Calculate an Educational and General (E&G) cost per FTE for Years 1 and 5 (Total E&G divided by FTE). Projected Implementation Projected Program Costs Enrollment Timeframe (From Table 2) (From Table 1) E&G Contract E&G Auxiliary HC FTE Cost per & Grants Total Cost Funds Funds FTE Funds Year 1 35 26.25 $26,895 705,990 705,990 Year 2 40 30 Year 3 44 33 Year 4 48 36 Year 5 50 37.5 $19,764 741,145 741,145 Note: This outline and the questions pertaining to each section must be reproduced within the body of the proposal to ensure that all sections have been satisfactorily addressed. Tables 1 through 4 are to be included 2 as Appendix A and not reproduced within the body of the proposals because this often causes errors in the automatic calculations. INTRODUCTION Preface: This application for a new Ph.D is driven by two synergistic forces; a recent reorganization of the (former) Department of Biology and recognition that the field of biology has grown enormously since the Department of Biology was formed in the 1970’s. The reorganization created two new departments; the Department of Cell Biology, Microbiology, and Molecular Biology (CMMB) and the Department of Integrative Biology (IB). Each department is housed in a separate building and each has operated independently for the past seven years. The central mission of the Department of Integrative Biology focuses on the integration of morphological and physiological adaptations that facilitate the biological, ecological and evolutionary competency of organisms. All levels of organization are subjected to research, from molecules to ecosystems, and all forms of life are included from microbes to plants to animals. IB’s faculty members are engaged in research activities that involve, broadly, conservation biology, global change biology, freshwater biology and pollution, marine biology, biomechanics, disease biology, biogeochemistry, and evolutionary biology. Their research integrates our understanding of living things across all levels of organization. The central mission of the Department of Cell Biology, Molecular Biology and Microbiology focuses on the investigation of human diseases at the molecular and cellular level. This is broadly organized into three focus areas: Genome Integrity and Mechanisms of Aging; Bacterial Pathogenesis and Resistance; and Structural and Computational Biology. Specifically, faculty members in CMMB are engaged in research using model organisms that focus on neurodegenerative disorders, ageing related diseases, the immunological and genetic basis of diabetes, cancer development and progression, biosensing based detection of infectious agents in food and the environment, the pathogenesis of bacterial infection, antibiotic resistance and drug development and the immunology of host-pathogen interaction. Their research seeks to develop a better understanding of human disease causation and development, with the goal of uncovering new treatment options and drug targets. This proposal addresses the creation of a new Ph.D., in Integrative Biology offered by the Department of Integrative Biology (CIP Code 26.1399). The Ph.D. in Biology has been granted since the 1970’s. When the two new Ph.D. degress are in place the old Ph.D in Biology will be sunset. 3 . I. Program Description and Relationship to System-Level Goals A. Briefly describe within a few paragraphs the degree program under consideration, including (a) level; (b) emphases, including concentrations, tracks, or specializations; (c) total number of credit hours; and (d) overall purpose, including examples of employment or education opportunities that may be available to program graduates. Level: The proposed degree is the Ph.D. and is a graduate level degree. Emphases, including concentrations, tracks, or specializations: The Ph.D. program in Integrative Biology is built to facilitate research in three Areas of Concentration including Ecology and Evolution, Morphology and Physiology, and Environmental and Ecological Microbiology. These three areas of concentration also reflect the integrative nature of the research being conducted by members of the Department. Many of the students working within the Ecology and Evolution Area have interests in conservation biology and develop skills in molecular ecology to understand genetic relationships of the organismsthey study. Most students in the Ecology and Evolution area also become well-versed in Geographic Information System applications to study past and present distributions of the focal species. Students working within the Morphology and Physiology Area are performing research in functional and comparative morphology. Students working within the Environmental and Ecological Microbiology Area are becoming experts in identifying pollutants that contaminate the fresh water systems of Florida and beyond and are developing rapid methods of identifying the sources of those pollutants or may be studying microbes that play a major role in the global carbon cycle. A significant number of our students conduct research in areas that are considered “applied biology,” that is, their research is aimed at solving problems that benefit the State of Florida and beyond. Total number of credit hours: This degree requires 90 semester hours beyond the Bachelor’s Degree Overall purpose including examples of employment or education opportunities that may be available to program graduates: This degree is part of the broader area of academics known as STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math). The goal of the faculty is to cultivate scientists to advance our knowledge and understanding of the natural world. Our recent Ph.D. students have had great success finding professional positions directly after graduation or after gaining additional experience through post doctoral training. A few examples of the types of positions taken by recent graduates include; Research Scientist for the U.S. Geological Service in California, Post Doctoral Researcher at Pennsylvania State University, Post Doctoral Researcher at Harvard, faculty member at Allegheny College, faculty member at the University of Tampa, Fisheries Biologist for the State of Washington, and a Senior Ecologist for national 4 biological consulting firm. B. Describe how the proposed program is consistent with the current State University System (SUS) Strategic Planning
Recommended publications
  • LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned

    LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned

    Space Sci Rev DOI 10.1007/s11214-011-9759-y LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned Jennifer L. Heldmann · Anthony Colaprete · Diane H. Wooden · Robert F. Ackermann · David D. Acton · Peter R. Backus · Vanessa Bailey · Jesse G. Ball · William C. Barott · Samantha K. Blair · Marc W. Buie · Shawn Callahan · Nancy J. Chanover · Young-Jun Choi · Al Conrad · Dolores M. Coulson · Kirk B. Crawford · Russell DeHart · Imke de Pater · Michael Disanti · James R. Forster · Reiko Furusho · Tetsuharu Fuse · Tom Geballe · J. Duane Gibson · David Goldstein · Stephen A. Gregory · David J. Gutierrez · Ryan T. Hamilton · Taiga Hamura · David E. Harker · Gerry R. Harp · Junichi Haruyama · Morag Hastie · Yutaka Hayano · Phillip Hinz · Peng K. Hong · Steven P. James · Toshihiko Kadono · Hideyo Kawakita · Michael S. Kelley · Daryl L. Kim · Kosuke Kurosawa · Duk-Hang Lee · Michael Long · Paul G. Lucey · Keith Marach · Anthony C. Matulonis · Richard M. McDermid · Russet McMillan · Charles Miller · Hong-Kyu Moon · Ryosuke Nakamura · Hirotomo Noda · Natsuko Okamura · Lawrence Ong · Dallan Porter · Jeffery J. Puschell · John T. Rayner · J. Jedadiah Rembold · Katherine C. Roth · Richard J. Rudy · Ray W. Russell · Eileen V. Ryan · William H. Ryan · Tomohiko Sekiguchi · Yasuhito Sekine · Mark A. Skinner · Mitsuru Sôma · Andrew W. Stephens · Alex Storrs · Robert M. Suggs · Seiji Sugita · Eon-Chang Sung · Naruhisa Takatoh · Jill C. Tarter · Scott M. Taylor · Hiroshi Terada · Chadwick J. Trujillo · Vidhya Vaitheeswaran · Faith Vilas · Brian D. Walls · Jun-ihi Watanabe · William J. Welch · Charles E. Woodward · Hong-Suh Yim · Eliot F. Young Received: 9 October 2010 / Accepted: 8 February 2011 © The Author(s) 2011.
  • Andrea RAZ-GUZMÁN1*, Leticia HUIDOBRO2, and Virginia PADILLA3

    Andrea RAZ-GUZMÁN1*, Leticia HUIDOBRO2, and Virginia PADILLA3

    ACTA ICHTHYOLOGICA ET PISCATORIA (2018) 48 (4): 341–362 DOI: 10.3750/AIEP/02451 AN UPDATED CHECKLIST AND CHARACTERISATION OF THE ICHTHYOFAUNA (ELASMOBRANCHII AND ACTINOPTERYGII) OF THE LAGUNA DE TAMIAHUA, VERACRUZ, MEXICO Andrea RAZ-GUZMÁN1*, Leticia HUIDOBRO2, and Virginia PADILLA3 1 Posgrado en Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 2 Instituto Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura, SAGARPA, Ciudad de México 3 Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México Raz-Guzmán A., Huidobro L., Padilla V. 2018. An updated checklist and characterisation of the ichthyofauna (Elasmobranchii and Actinopterygii) of the Laguna de Tamiahua, Veracruz, Mexico. Acta Ichthyol. Piscat. 48 (4): 341–362. Background. Laguna de Tamiahua is ecologically and economically important as a nursery area that favours the recruitment of species that sustain traditional fisheries. It has been studied previously, though not throughout its whole area, and considering the variety of habitats that sustain these fisheries, as well as an increase in population growth that impacts the system. The objectives of this study were to present an updated list of fish species, data on special status, new records, commercial importance, dominance, density, ecotic position, and the spatial and temporal distribution of species in the lagoon, together with a comparison of Tamiahua with 14 other Gulf of Mexico lagoons. Materials and methods. Fish were collected in August and December 1996 with a Renfro beam net and an otter trawl from different habitats throughout the lagoon. The species were identified, classified in relation to special status, new records, commercial importance, density, dominance, ecotic position, and spatial distribution patterns.
  • Session 2 Classifying Living Things

    Session 2 Classifying Living Things

    Session 2 Classifying Living Things Our Earth hosts an astonishing diversity of life forms. We can find plants, animals, and other types of organisms in almost every habitat that we encounter. In Session 1, characteristics shared by all life forms were introduced as features that unify the living world. Session 2 focuses on how life’s diversity arises from variation on these same unifying features. A closer look at cells, in particular, introduces fundamental differences among life forms that have become one basis for biological classification. The Video How do we answer the question: What is it? Just what makes a plant a plant, or an animal an animal? Sally Goetz Shuler, representing Science and Technology for Children (STC), highlights questions like these as she introduces us to activities in the Organisms unit. The children in the Science Studio give us insight into how second and third graders define plants and animals, as well as their awareness of other life forms. Stephanie Selznick’s first graders in Dorchester, Massachusetts use Venn diagrams to determine how plants and animals are alike and different. Their early ideas are based on observations of class terrariums and aquariums, where they’ve observed these life forms over time. Dr. Paul Williams returns to share what’s going on in Bottle Biology—an ongoing Web site-based activity designed to apply session topics and to serve as a K–6 resource as well. We hear from Dr. Colleen Cavanaugh as she takes us to the deepest parts of the ocean to introduce us to her favorite group of living things—life forms that aren’t classified as plants or animals.
  • The Conservation Biology of Tortoises

    The Conservation Biology of Tortoises

    The Conservation Biology of Tortoises Edited by Ian R. Swingland and Michael W. Klemens IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group and The Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology Occasional Papers of the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) No. 5 IUCN—The World Conservation Union IUCN Species Survival Commission Role of the SSC 3. To cooperate with the World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC) The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is IUCN's primary source of the in developing and evaluating a data base on the status of and trade in wild scientific and technical information required for the maintenance of biological flora and fauna, and to provide policy guidance to WCMC. diversity through the conservation of endangered and vulnerable species of 4. To provide advice, information, and expertise to the Secretariat of the fauna and flora, whilst recommending and promoting measures for their con- Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna servation, and for the management of other species of conservation concern. and Flora (CITES) and other international agreements affecting conser- Its objective is to mobilize action to prevent the extinction of species, sub- vation of species or biological diversity. species, and discrete populations of fauna and flora, thereby not only maintain- 5. To carry out specific tasks on behalf of the Union, including: ing biological diversity but improving the status of endangered and vulnerable species. • coordination of a programme of activities for the conservation of biological diversity within the framework of the IUCN Conserva- tion Programme. Objectives of the SSC • promotion of the maintenance of biological diversity by monitor- 1.
  • Mayan Cichlid (Cichlasoma Urophthalmum) Ecological Risk Screening Summary

    Mayan Cichlid (Cichlasoma Urophthalmum) Ecological Risk Screening Summary

    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mayan Cichlid (Cichlasoma urophthalmum) Ecological Risk Screening Summary Web Version – 11/01/2012 Photo: Alexander Calder 1 Native Range, and Status in the United States Native Range From Robins (2001): The Mayan cichlid is native to the Central American Atlantic slope waters of southeastern Mexico (including the Yucatán Peninsula), Belize, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua. Nonindigenous Occurrences From Schofield et al. (2011): “This species was first documented in Florida when specimens were observed and collected and observed in Everglades National Park in 1983; it is established in several areas in and around the park (Loftus 1987; Lorenz et al. 1997; Smith-Vaniz, personal communication [not cited]; Tilmant 1999) and Big Cypress National Preserve (Nico, unpublished data; Tilmant 1999).” “On the east side of Florida it has been recorded from Canal C-111 north to the Little River Canal (C-7 Canal) (Shafland 1995).” Cichlasoma urophthalmus Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – Web Version – 11/1/2012 “A single specimen was taken from a rock pit in Manatee County in October 1975 (Smith- Vaniz, personal communication [not cited]).” “Mayan ciclids have also been collected in Lake Okeechobee and Lake Osbourne, Palm Beach County in 2003 (Cocking 2003; Werner 2003).” “A new population was found in Charlotte Harbor in the summer of 2003 (Adams and Wolfe 2007; Associated Press 2003; Charlotte Harbor NEP 2004; Byrley, personal communication [not cited]). This is the most northern population known.” Reported established in Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge (2005).” “A specimen was collected in Holiday Park in Broward County (International Game Fishing Association 2000).” “In 2006, this species was found to be established in Mobbly Bayou in Tampa Bay and in canals on Merritt Island in 2007 (Paperno et al.
  • Froglog95 New Version Draft1.Indd

    Froglog95 New Version Draft1.Indd

    March 2011 Vol. 95 FrogLogwww.amphibians.org News from the herpetological community The new face of the ASG “Lost” Frogs Red List The global search Updating South comes to an end. Africas Red Where next? Lists. Page 1 FrogLog Vol. 95 | March 2011 | 1 2 | FrogLog Vol. 95 | March 2011 CONTENTS The Sierra Caral of Guatemala a refuge for endemic amphibians page 5 The Search for “Lost” Frogs page 12 Recent diversifi cation in old habitats: Molecules and morphology in the endangered frog, Craugastor uno page 17 Updating the IUCN Red List status of South African amphibians 6 Amphibians on the IUCN Red List: Developments and changes since the Global Amphibian Assessment 7 The forced closure of conservation work on Seychelles Sooglossidae 8 Alien amphibians challenge Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis 9 Is there a decline of amphibian richness in Bellanwila-Attidiya Sanctuary? 10 High prevalence of the amphibian chytrid pathogen in Gabon 11 Breeding-site selection by red-belly toads, Melanophryniscus stelzneri (Anura: Bufonidae), in Sierras of Córdoba, Argentina 11 Upcoming meetings 20 | Recent Publications 20 | Internships & Jobs 23 Funding Opportunities 22 | Author Instructions 24 | Current Authors 25 FrogLog Vol. 95 | March 2011 | 3 FrogLog Editorial elcome to the new-look FrogLog. It has been a busy few months Wfor the ASG! We have redesigned the look and feel of FrogLog ASG & EDITORIAL COMMITTEE along with our other media tools to better serve the needs of the ASG community. We hope that FrogLog will become a regular addition to James P. Collins your reading and a platform for sharing research, conservation stories, events, and opportunities.
  • U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service June 14, 2016 Biological Opinion Revised

    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service June 14, 2016 Biological Opinion Revised

    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service June 14, 2016 Biological Opinion ON Revised Land and Resource Management Plan Amendment to increase Florida Scrub- Jay Management Areas on the Ocala National Forest (Amendment 12) Prepared by: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Jacksonville, Florida Biological Opinion U.S. Forest Service Southern Region FWS Log No. 04EF1000-2016-F-0215 2 The Service concurs with your determination that the effects from activities under the proposed amendment on the Florida bonamia, scrub buckwheat, and Lewton’s polygala are within the scope of effects described in the September 18, 1998 BA for the LRMP and evaluated in the Service’s 1998 Opinion. In addition, effects of implementing the LRMP (including the proposed amendment) on the scrub pigeon wings were recently disclosed in your Biological Assessment (BA) of Nov 24, 2015 were evaluated in the Service’s Opinion of December 17, 2015. Therefore, these plant species will not be addressed further in the amended Opinion below. This amended Opinion is based on information provided to the Service through a BA, telephone conversations, e-mails, field investigation notes, and other sources of information. A complete administrative record of this consultation is on file at the Jacksonville Ecological Services Office. Consultation History September 21, 1998: NFF initiated formal consultation on revision of the LRMP December 18, 1998: The Service provided a non-jeopardy combined Biological and Conference Opinion on the LRMP to NFF concluding formal consultation. From March 2014 to November of 2015, the Service and staff from the NFF supervisor’s office and ONF participated in several meetings and conference calls to discuss how to address Forest Service Section 7(a)(1) obligations under the Act and the proposed amendment to the NFF LRMP.
  • Ecology of the Mayan Cichlid, Cichlasoma Urophthalmus Günther, in the Alvarado Lagoonal System, Veracruz, Mexico

    Ecology of the Mayan Cichlid, Cichlasoma Urophthalmus Günther, in the Alvarado Lagoonal System, Veracruz, Mexico

    Gulf and Caribbean Research Volume 17 Issue 1 January 2005 Ecology of the Mayan Cichlid, Cichlasoma urophthalmus Günther, in the Alvarado Lagoonal System, Veracruz, Mexico Rafael Chavez-Lopez Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico Mark S. Peterson University of Southern Mississippi, [email protected] Nancy J. Brown-Peterson University of Southern Mississippi, [email protected] Ana Adalia Morales-Gomez Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/gcr Part of the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Chavez-Lopez, R., M. S. Peterson, N. J. Brown-Peterson, A. Morales-Gomez and J. Franco-Lopez. 2005. Ecology of the Mayan Cichlid, Cichlasoma urophthalmus Günther, in the Alvarado Lagoonal System, Veracruz, Mexico. Gulf and Caribbean Research 17 (1): 123-131. Retrieved from https://aquila.usm.edu/gcr/vol17/iss1/13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18785/gcr.1701.13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Gulf and Caribbean Research by an authorized editor of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ecology of the Mayan Cichlid, Cichlasoma urophthalmus Günther, in the Alvarado Lagoonal System, Veracruz, Mexico Authors Rafael Chavez-Lopez, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico; Mark S. Peterson, University of Southern Mississippi; Nancy J. Brown-Peterson, University of Southern Mississippi; Ana Adalia Morales- Gomez, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico; and Jonathan Franco-Lopez, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico This article is available in Gulf and Caribbean Research: https://aquila.usm.edu/gcr/vol17/iss1/13 Book for Press.qxp 2/28/05 3:30 PM Page 123 Gulf and Caribbean Research Vol 17, 123–131, 2005 Manuscript received July 18, 2004; accepted September 20, 2004 ECOLOGY OF THE MAYAN CICHLID, CICHLASOMA UROPHTHALMUS GÜNTHER, IN THE ALVARADO LAGOONAL SYSTEM, VERACRUZ, MEXICO Rafael Chávez-López, Mark S.
  • Strategic Study of Environment Impact of the Framework Plan and Program of the Onshore Exploration and Production of Hydrocarbons

    Strategic Study of Environment Impact of the Framework Plan and Program of the Onshore Exploration and Production of Hydrocarbons

    Strategic Study of Environment Impact of the Framework Plan and Program of the Onshore Exploration and Production of Hydrocarbons Non-Technical Summary Zagreb, July 2015 Consortium: Elektroprojekt d.d. STUDY IMPLEMENTERS: Alexandera von Humboldta 4, 10 000 Zagreb Ires ekologija d.o.o. za zaštitu prirode i okoliša Prilaz baruna Filipovića 21, 10 000 Zagreb STUDY LEADER: Mr.sc. Zlatko Pletikapić, BEng ASSISTANT STUDY LEADER: Mirko Mesarić, dipl. ing. biol.. COORDINATOR: Jelena Likić, prof. biol. Table of Contents 1. Description of the Framework Plan and Programme ...................................................................................... 1 2. Main objectives of the Framework Plan and Programme ............................................................................... 2 3. Overview of the previous onshore exploration and production of hydrocarbons............................................. 2 4. Technical aspects of exploration and production of hydrocarbons ................................................................. 3 5. Environmental Impact of the Framework Plan and Programme ..................................................................... 7 6. Environmental protection measures ............................................................................................................. 22 7. Environmental monitoring ............................................................................................................................. 28 8. Conclusions and recommendations .............................................................................................................
  • A Dissertation Entitled Evolution, Systematics

    A Dissertation Entitled Evolution, Systematics

    A Dissertation Entitled Evolution, systematics, and phylogeography of Ponto-Caspian gobies (Benthophilinae: Gobiidae: Teleostei) By Matthew E. Neilson Submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for The Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Biology (Ecology) ____________________________________ Adviser: Dr. Carol A. Stepien ____________________________________ Committee Member: Dr. Christine M. Mayer ____________________________________ Committee Member: Dr. Elliot J. Tramer ____________________________________ Committee Member: Dr. David J. Jude ____________________________________ Committee Member: Dr. Juan L. Bouzat ____________________________________ College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo December 2009 Copyright © 2009 This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. _______________________________________________________________________ An Abstract of Evolution, systematics, and phylogeography of Ponto-Caspian gobies (Benthophilinae: Gobiidae: Teleostei) Matthew E. Neilson Submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for The Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Biology (Ecology) The University of Toledo December 2009 The study of biodiversity, at multiple hierarchical levels, provides insight into the evolutionary history of taxa and provides a framework for understanding patterns in ecology. This is especially poignant in invasion biology, where the prevalence of invasiveness in certain taxonomic groups could
  • An Annotated Checklist of the Chondrichthyan Fishes Inhabiting the Northern Gulf of Mexico Part 1: Batoidea

    An Annotated Checklist of the Chondrichthyan Fishes Inhabiting the Northern Gulf of Mexico Part 1: Batoidea

    Zootaxa 4803 (2): 281–315 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4803.2.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:325DB7EF-94F7-4726-BC18-7B074D3CB886 An annotated checklist of the chondrichthyan fishes inhabiting the northern Gulf of Mexico Part 1: Batoidea CHRISTIAN M. JONES1,*, WILLIAM B. DRIGGERS III1,4, KRISTIN M. HANNAN2, ERIC R. HOFFMAYER1,5, LISA M. JONES1,6 & SANDRA J. RAREDON3 1National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Mississippi Laboratories, 3209 Frederic Street, Pascagoula, Mississippi, U.S.A. 2Riverside Technologies Inc., Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Mississippi Laboratories, 3209 Frederic Street, Pascagoula, Missis- sippi, U.S.A. [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2687-3331 3Smithsonian Institution, Division of Fishes, Museum Support Center, 4210 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, Maryland, U.S.A. [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8295-6000 4 [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8577-968X 5 [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5297-9546 6 [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2228-7156 *Corresponding author. [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5093-1127 Abstract Herein we consolidate the information available concerning the biodiversity of batoid fishes in the northern Gulf of Mexico, including nearly 70 years of survey data collected by the National Marine Fisheries Service, Mississippi Laboratories and their predecessors. We document 41 species proposed to occur in the northern Gulf of Mexico.
  • Download PDF of Summer 2016 Colloquy

    Download PDF of Summer 2016 Colloquy

    Nonprofit Organization summer 2016 US Postage HONORING EXCELLENCE p.20 ONE DAY IN MAY p.24 PAID North Reading, MA Permit No.8 What’s the BUZZ? Bees, behavior & pollination p.12 What’s the Buzz? 12 Bees, Behavior, and Pollination ONE GRADUATE STUDENT’S INVESTIGATION INTO BUMBLEBEE BEHAVIOR The 2016 Centennial Medalists 20 HONORING FRANCIS FUKUYAMA, DAVID MUMFORD, JOHN O’MALLEY, AND CECILIA ROUSE Intellectual Assembly 22 ALUMNI DAY 2016 One Day in May 24 COMMENCEMENT 2016 summer/16 An alumni publication of Harvard University’s Graduate School of Arts and Sciences 3 FROM UNIVERSITY HALL 4 NEWS & NOTES Harvard Horizons, Health Policy turns 25, new Alumni Council leadership. 8 Q&A WITH COLLEEN CAVANAUGH A path-breaking biologist provides new evolutionary insights. 10 SHELF LIFE Elephants, Manchuria, the Uyghur nation and more. 26 NOTED News from our alumni. 28 ALUMNI CONNECTIONS Dudley 25th, Life Lab launches, and recent graduates gathering. summer Cover Image: Patrick Hruby Facing Image: Commencement Begins /16 Photograph by Tony Rinaldo CONTRIBUTORS Xiao-Li Meng dean, PhD ’90 Jon Petitt director of alumni relations and publications Patrick Hruby is a Los Angeles–based Ann Hall editor freelance illustrator and designer with Visual Dialogue design an insatiable appetite for color. His work Colloquy is published three times a year by the Graduate School Alumni has appeared in The New York Times, Association (GSAA). Governed by its Alumni Council, the GSAA represents Fortune Magazine, and WIRED, among and advances the interests of alumni of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences through alumni events and publications. others.