DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 210/Thursday, October 30, 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 210/Thursday, October 30, 2014 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 210 / Thursday, October 30, 2014 / Proposed Rules 64553 incremental NGCC generation identified generation levels. Together, the same information sources and presented under building block 2 (given that under approach in the proposal and the in the same format as the 2012 dataset the proposal, generation from building alternative approach in this document used for the June 2014 proposed rule. block 2 was assumed to reduce carbon reflect a range of possible emission rate We are also making these data available intensity by replacing generation from impacts that could be expected through at: http://www2.epa.gov/ 2012 levels). The rationale for this the application of the incremental RE cleanpowerplan/. approach would be that the BSER for all and EE in the state goal calculation. The Dated: October 27, 2014. fossil generation includes replacing that EPA is seeking comment on which Janet G. McCabe, generation with incremental RE and EE. approach better reflects the BSER. At Moreover, this approach acknowledges the same time, we note that the Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Air and Radiation. that, taken by itself, such incremental alternative state goal formula generation would not necessarily approaches listed here may raise a [FR Doc. 2014–25845 Filed 10–29–14; 8:45 am] replace the highest-emitting generation, number of additional considerations. BILLING CODE 6560–50–P but would likely replace a mix of These approaches, for example, would existing fossil generating technologies. increase the collective stringency of the b. Prioritize replacement of historical state goals, which would likely increase DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR fossil steam generation. A second both the costs and benefits of the alternative approach would be similar to proposed rule. Fish and Wildlife Service the one described above, but the As noted above, at least some of these adjustment would reflect incremental alternative applications of the target- 50 CFR Part 23 RE and EE first replacing fossil steam setting equation would result in many [Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2013–0052] generation below 2012 levels rather than states having tighter rate-based goals. replacing all fossil generation on a pro Therefore, in considering any of these RIN 1018–AZ53 rata basis. Subsequent to replacing fossil changes, the EPA would also consider Notice of Intent To Include Four Native steam generation, if there were any how they relate to other issues U.S. Freshwater Turtle Species in remaining incremental RE or EE, it discussed in this document, as well as would replace gas turbine generation in the original proposal, particularly Appendix III of the Convention on levels and the corresponding emissions. inclusion of new NGCC units in the International Trade in Endangered Therefore, the reduction in carbon state goal calculation and alternatives to Species of Wild Fauna and Flora intensity observed from this type of the 2020–2029 glide path. While the (CITES) adjustment would be more than that goal-setting formula adjustments AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, estimated in the proposal’s goal-setting described here would tighten the state Interior. formula and more than the alternative goals, the glide path adjustments ACTION: Proposed rule: Notice of intent approach above, in section III.C.1.a, discussed previously would have the to amend CITES Appendix III. because incremental and avoided offsetting effect of reducing the generation would replace generation stringency of the goals. The EPA SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and from higher-emitting fossil steam welcomes comment specifically on the Wildlife Service (Service), propose to sources first. The rationale for this potential changes identified in this include the common snapping turtle alternative approach would be based on document in terms both of the rationale (Chelydra serpentina), Florida softshell the view that, as part of the BSER, for these changes and of their effects on turtle (Apalone ferox), smooth softshell because fossil steam generation has the stringency of the state goals. turtle (Apalone mutica), and spiny higher carbon intensity, it should be 2. Alternatives to the 2012 Data Year softshell turtle (Apalone spinifera) in replaced before NGCC generation. Appendix III of the Convention on A number of stakeholders have raised By identifying the two alternative International Trade in Endangered concerns over the use of 2012 as the approaches above and providing more Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES single data year for calculating interim detailed data by which to assess them, or Convention), including live and dead and final goals. The EPA has identified the EPA is seeking additional whole specimens, and all readily several approaches that stakeholders engagement during the public comment recognizable parts, products, and may want to consider and upon which process and supporting the ability of derivatives. Listing these four native we are requesting comment. The EPA is stakeholders to provide comment. The U.S. freshwater turtle species (including seeking comment on whether we should EPA is requesting comment on whether their subspecies, except Apalone use a different single data year or the a formula change of this nature would spinifera atra, which is already better reflect the emission reduction average of a combination of years (such included in Appendix I of CITES) in potential from incremental RE and EE. as 2010, 2011, and 2012) to calculate the Appendix III of CITES is necessary to In particular, the EPA is seeking state fossil fuel emission rates used in allow us to adequately monitor comment on how the amount of state goal calculations. The agency is international trade in these species; to incremental RE and EE in the June 2014 also seeking comment on whether state- determine whether exports are proposal relate to potential future specific circumstances exist that could occurring legally, with respect to State generation increases from existing fossil justify using different data years for and Federal law; and to determine sources. The EPA is also soliciting individual states, as opposed to using whether further measures under CITES comment on approaches where some the same data year, or combination of or other laws are required to conserve portion of such incremental generation years, consistently across states. is calculated to replace future increases Stakeholders have also expressed these species. in existing fossil generation with the interest in obtaining eGRID data for DATES: To ensure that we are able to remainder assumed to replace historical years prior to 2012 in order to foster consider your comment on this existing fossil generation. The EPA is comparison with results from the 2012 proposed rulemaking action, you must also requesting comment on how to treat dataset. The EPA is adding, to the send it by December 29, 2014. a state in which the incremental RE and docket for this action, data for the years ADDRESSES: You may submit comments EE exceeds historical fossil steam 2010 and 2011 that are based on the by one of the following methods: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:17 Oct 29, 2014 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30OCP1.SGM 30OCP1 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 64554 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 210 / Thursday, October 30, 2014 / Proposed Rules • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// public review. However, we cannot international trade in sturgeon caviar www.regulations.gov. Follow the guarantee that we will be able to do so. (73 FR 40983, July 17, 2008). instructions for submitting comments We will post all hardcopy comments on The Service’s International Wildlife on Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2013– http://www.regulations.gov. Trade Program convened a freshwater 0052. Comments and materials we receive, turtle workshop in St. Louis in • U.S. Mail or Hand-Delivery: Public as well as supporting documentation we September 2010 to discuss the pressing Comments Processing, Attn: Docket No. used in preparing this proposed rule, management, regulatory, scientific, and FWS–HQ–ES–2013–0052; U.S. Fish and will be available for public inspection enforcement needs associated with the Wildlife Service Headquarters, MS: on http://www.regulations.gov, or by harvest and trade of freshwater turtles in BPHC; 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls appointment, between 8 a.m. and 4 the United States. As a follow up to one Church, VA 22041–3803. p.m., Monday through Friday, except of the recommendations put forth at the We will post all comments on http:// Federal holidays, at: U.S. Fish and St Louis Workshop in 2010 the Service www.regulations.gov. This generally Wildlife Service Headquarters, Division hosted a workshop in Baton Rouge, LA means that we will post any personal of Management Authority, 5275 in November 2011 for all 16 States with information you provide us (see the Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041– turtle farms to develop best management Public Comments section below for 3803; telephone 703–358–2095. practices for turtle farms operating in more information). the United States. Information on these Background workshops can be found on our Web FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: CITES, an international treaty, site at http://www.fws.gov/international/ Craig Hoover, Chief, Wildlife Trade and animals/freshwater-turtles.html or from Conservation Branch, Division of regulates the import, export, re-export, DMA (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Management Authority, U.S. Fish and and introduction from the sea of certain CONTACT). Wildlife Service Headquarters, MS: IA; animal and plant species. CITES was 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA negotiated in 1973 in Washington, DC, CITES Appendices at a conference attended by delegations 22041–3803; telephone 703–358–2095; Species covered by the Convention from 80 countries. The United States facsimile 703–358–2298. If you use a are listed in one of three Appendices. telecommunications device for the deaf ratified the Convention on September Appendix I includes species threatened (TDD), call the Federal Information 13, 1973, and it entered into force on with extinction that are or may be Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annex 1 附表1 More Endangered Species Are Brought Into Control 更
    Annex 1 附表 1 More Endangered Species are brought into Control 更多瀕危物種納入管制 1. Inclusion in Appendix I 列入附錄 I Species 物種 Common Name (for reference only) 俗稱 (只供參考) Lizards 蜥蜴 Abronia anzuetoi Anzuetoi alligator lizard 樹鱷蜥、安氏樹鱷蛇蜥 Abronia campbelli Campbell's alligator lizard 樹鱷蜥、坎氏樹鱷蛇蜥 Abronia fimbriata Fringed arboreal alligator lizard 樹鱷蜥、飾緣樹鱷蛇蜥 Abronia frosti Frost's alligator lizard 樹鱷蜥、弗氏樹鱷蛇蜥 Abronia meledona Meledona alligator lizard 樹鱷蜥、米拉多拉樹鱷蛇蜥 Cnemaspis psychedelica Psychedelic rock gecko 彩色壁虎、幻彩東虎 Lygodactylus williamsi Turquoise dwarf gecko 侏儒日光守宮、青藍柳趾虎、鈷藍日守宮 Frog 蛙 Telmatobius culeus Titicaca water frog 的的喀喀湖水蛙 Snails 蝸牛 Polymita spp. Cuban landsnails 古巴蝸牛屬所有種、彩條蝸牛屬所有種 2. Transfer from Appendix II to Appendix I 由附錄 II 轉入附錄 I Species 物種 Common Name (for reference only) 俗稱 (只供參考) Pangolins 穿山甲 Manis crassicaudata Indian pangolin 印度穿山甲 Manis culionensis Philippine pangolin 菲律賓穿山甲 Manis gigantea Giant pangolin 大穿山甲 Manis javanica Sunda pangolin 馬來穿山甲 Manis pentadactyla Chinese pangolin 中華穿山甲 Manis temminckii South African pangolin 南非穿山甲 Manis tetradactyla Long-tailed pangolin 長尾穿山甲 Manis tricuspis White-bellied pangolin 樹穿山甲 Monkey 猴 Macaca sylvanus Barbary macaque 巴巴利獼猴、北非獼猴 Parrot 鸚鵡 Psittacus erithacus African grey parrot 非洲灰鸚鵡 Lizard 蜥蜴 Shinisaurus crocodilurus Chinese crocodile lizard 瑤山鱷蜥 Plants 植物 Sclerocactus blainei Blaine's fishhook cactus 布氏白虹山 Sclerocactus cloverae New Mexico fishhook cactus 新墨西哥鯱玉 Sclerocactus sileri Siler's fishhook cactus 塞氏鯱玉 3. Transfer from Appendix I to Appendix II 由附錄 I 轉入附錄 II Species 物種 Common Name (for reference only) 俗稱 (只供參考) Mammals 哺乳類 Puma concolor coryi Florida cougar, Florida puma 美洲獅佛羅里達亞種 Puma concolor couguar Eastern cougar, eastern puma 美洲獅東部亞種 Equus zebra zebra Cape mountain zebra 山斑馬指名亞種 Ave s 鳥類 Lichenostomus melanops cassidix Helmeted honeyeater 黃披肩吸蜜鳥卡西迪亞種 Ninox novaeseelandiae undulata Norfolk boobook 布布克鷹鴞諾福克島亞種 Crocodiles 鱷魚 Crocodylus acutus 1 American crocodile 窄吻鱷 Crocodylus porosus 2 Estuarine crocodile 灣鱷 Frog 蛙 Dyscophus antongilii Tomato frog 安通吉爾灣姬蛙 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Turtle Monitoring Turtle Notching Image of Turtle Trap
    Monitoring Turtles at Nygren Wetland Preserve India John ’12, Beloit College Sustainability Fellows Program [1,2] Summer 2010 Blanding’s Turtle Painted Turtle [1,2] Emydoidea blandingii Chrysemys picta Turtle Monitoring Size: 6-10 inch carapace Habitat: Shallow marshy areas •Four traps made by volunteers set throughout the with abundant submerged preserve vegetation; semi-terrestrial •Traps were checked 3-4 times a week Temperament: Docile and shy •Traps were moved frequently throughout the property Status: State Threatened Species, •Captured turtles were: despite reported sightings, no • weighed Blanding’s turtles have been • measured (plastron and carapace length and width) captured or recorded at Nygren. Plastron (bottom of shell) • notched (Painted Turtles only) of Midland Painted Turtle • released Blanding’s Turtle in Boone County Midland Painted Turtle Photo by: India John Photo by Courtney Schultz Photo by Courtney Schultz Two subspecies in Wisconsin: [1,2] Midland Painted ( Chrysemys picta marginata ) Softshell Turtle Western Painted ( Chrysemys picta bellii ). Apalone Size: 4-8 inch carapace Image Habitat: Marshes and ponds, with dense aquatic vegetation of Temperament: Docile Status: Common; the Western Painted is the turtle most abundant turtle in Wisconsin. Plastron of a Western trap Painted Turtle Photo by India John Snapping Turtle [1,2] Carapace (top of shell) of a Interns India John and Scott Kruger making turtle traps Eastern Spiny Softshell turtle Smooth Softshell turtle Chelydra serpentina Photo by Courtney Schultz Photo by Greg Keilback Photo by India John Two species: Eastern Spiny Softshell (Apalone spinifera ), Turtle Notching Smooth Softshell ( Apalone muticus ) Size: Spiny - carapace: fem. 7 - 18 in., Marked individual turtles by notching the m.
    [Show full text]
  • RELATIVE ABUNDANCE of SPINEY SOFTSHELL TURTLES (Apalone Spinifera) on the MISSOURI and YELLOWSTONE RIVERS in MONTANA FINAL REPOR
    RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF SPINEY SOFTSHELL TURTLES (Apalone spinifera) ON THE MISSOURI AND YELLOWSTONE RIVERS IN MONTANA FINAL REPORT Arnold R. Dood, Brad Schmitz, Vic Riggs, Nate McClenning, Matt Jeager, Dave Fuller, Ryan Rauscher, Steve Leathe, Dave Moore, JoAnn Dullum, John Ensign, Scott Story, Mike Backes Abstract In 2003, the Missouri River Natural Resources Committee (MRNRC) Wildlife Section advocated developing a survey for the relative abundance of softshell turtles (Apalone sp.) on the Missouri River system. Softshell turtles were selected because they occur throughout the system and there was some information suggesting that they may have been impacted by system operations. As a common riverine species, there were possibilities that softshell turtles may have been impacted because of the timing, level, and temperature of river flows as well as by dam construction and bank stabilization. In addition, there were reports from other areas in the species range that they may be especially sensitive to human disturbance. From 2004 through 2008, State and Federal agencies and Pacific Power and Light in Montana sampled the Missouri River from Great Falls, MT, to the confluence of the Missouri and Yellowstone (except Fort Peck Reservoir) as well as they Yellowstone River from above Billings to the confluence. Sampling consisted of setting turtle traps every two river miles and checking for three days. Turtles captured were measured, marked, and released. Results of the sampling efforts indicated high relative densities above Fort Peck Reservoir and variable densities on the Yellowstone. No spiny softshells were found below Fort Peck or on the Yellowstone below Sidney, MT. Possible reasons are presented and recommendations for future program direction as well as potential system modifications to benefit this species are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 100/Tuesday, May 24, 2016/Rules
    32664 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 100 / Tuesday, May 24, 2016 / Rules and Regulations Date certain Federal assist- State and location Community Effective date authorization/cancellation of Current effective ance no longer No. sale of flood insurance in community map date available in SFHAs Bonita, Village of, Morehouse Parish ........... 220316 April 3, 1997, Emerg; April 1, 2007, Reg; ......do ............... Do. July 6, 2016, Susp. Collinston, Village of, Morehouse Parish ..... 220399 June 17, 1991, Emerg; N/A, Reg; July 6, ......do ............... Do. 2016, Susp. Mer Rouge, Village of, Morehouse Parish ... 220128 May 3, 1973, Emerg; June 27, 1978, Reg; ......do ............... Do. July 6, 2016, Susp. Morehouse Parish, Unincorporated Areas ... 220367 April 14, 1983, Emerg; October 15, 1985, ......do ............... Do. Reg; July 6, 2016, Susp. New Mexico: Dona Ana County, Unincor- 350012 January 19, 1976, Emerg; September 27, ......do ............... Do. porated Areas. 1991, Reg; July 6, 2016, Susp. Hatch, Village of, Dona Ana County ............ 350013 December 10, 1974, Emerg; January 3, ......do ............... Do. 1986, Reg; July 6, 2016, Susp. Las Cruces, City of, Dona Ana County ........ 355332 July 24, 1970, Emerg; June 11, 1971, Reg; ......do ............... Do. July 6, 2016, Susp. Mesilla, Town of, Dona Ana County ............. 350113 March 7, 1975, Emerg; May 28, 1985, Reg; ......do ............... Do. July 6, 2016, Susp. Sunland Park, City of, Dona Ana County ..... 350147 N/A, Emerg; November 8, 2006, Reg; July ......do ............... Do. 6, 2016, Susp. *.....do = Ditto. Code for reading third column: Emerg. —Emergency; Reg. —Regular; Susp. —Suspension. Dated: May 12, 2016. species (including their subspecies, in September 2010, to discuss the Michael M.
    [Show full text]
  • A Field Guide to South Dakota Turtles
    A Field Guide to SOUTH DAKOTA TURTLES EC919 South Dakota State University | Cooperative Extension Service | USDA U.S. Geological Survey | South Dakota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit South Dakota Department of Game, Fish & Parks This publication may be cited as: Bandas, Sarah J., and Kenneth F. Higgins. 2004. Field Guide to South Dakota Turtles. SDCES EC 919. Brookings: South Dakota State University. Copies may be obtained from: Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries Sciences South Dakota State University Box 2140B, NPBL Brookings SD 57007-1696 South Dakota Dept of Game, Fish & Parks 523 E. Capitol, Foss Bldg Pierre SD 57501 SDSU Bulletin Room ACC Box 2231 Brookings, SD 57007 (605) 688–4187 A Field Guide to SOUTH DAKOTA TURTLES EC919 South Dakota State University | Cooperative Extension Service | USDA U.S. Geological Survey | South Dakota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit South Dakota Department of Game, Fish & Parks Sarah J. Bandas Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences South Dakota State University NPB Box 2140B Brookings, SD 57007 Kenneth F. Higgins U.S. Geological Survey South Dakota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit South Dakota State University NPB Box 2140B Brookings, SD 57007 Contents 2 Introduction . .3 Status of South Dakota turtles . .3 Fossil record and evolution . .4 General turtle information . .4 Taxonomy of South Dakota turtles . .9 Capturing techniques . .10 Turtle handling . .10 Turtle habitats . .13 Western Painted Turtle (Chrysemys picta bellii) . .15 Snapping Turtle (Chelydra serpentina) . .17 Spiny Softshell Turtle (Apalone spinifera) . .19 Smooth Softshell Turtle (Apalone mutica) . .23 False Map Turtle (Graptemys pseudogeographica) . .25 Western Ornate Box Turtle (Terrapene ornata ornata) .
    [Show full text]
  • Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2013–0052]
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 05/24/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-11201, and on FDsys.gov Billing Code 4333–15 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 23 [Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2013–0052] RIN 1018–AZ53 Inclusion of Four Native U.S. Freshwater Turtle Species in Appendix III of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), are listing the common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina), Florida softshell turtle (Apalone ferox), smooth softshell turtle (Apalone mutica), and spiny softshell turtle (Apalone spinifera) in Appendix 1 III of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES or Convention), including live and dead whole specimens, and all readily recognizable parts, products, and derivatives. Listing these four native U.S. freshwater turtle species (including their subspecies, except Apalone spinifera atra, which is already included in Appendix I of CITES) in Appendix III of CITES is necessary to allow us to adequately monitor international trade in these species; to determine whether exports are occurring legally, with respect to State and Federal law; and to determine whether further measures under CITES or other laws are required to conserve these species and their subspecies. DATES: This listing is effective [INSERT DATE 180 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: You may obtain information about permits for international trade in these species and their subspecies by contacting the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chelonian Advisory Group Regional Collection Plan 4Th Edition December 2015
    Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) Chelonian Advisory Group Regional Collection Plan 4th Edition December 2015 Editor Chelonian TAG Steering Committee 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Mission ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Steering Committee Structure ........................................................................................................... 3 Officers, Steering Committee Members, and Advisors ..................................................................... 4 Taxonomic Scope ............................................................................................................................. 6 Space Analysis Space .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Survey ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Current and Potential Holding Table Results ............................................................................. 8 Species Selection Process Process ..................................................................................................................................... 11 Decision Tree ........................................................................................................................... 13 Decision Tree Results .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Turtles of the World, 2010 Update: Annotated Checklist of Taxonomy, Synonymy, Distribution, and Conservation Status
    Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation ProjectTurtles of the IUCN/SSC of the World Tortoise – 2010and Freshwater Checklist Turtle Specialist Group 000.85 A.G.J. Rhodin, P.C.H. Pritchard, P.P. van Dijk, R.A. Saumure, K.A. Buhlmann, J.B. Iverson, and R.A. Mittermeier, Eds. Chelonian Research Monographs (ISSN 1088-7105) No. 5, doi:10.3854/crm.5.000.checklist.v3.2010 © 2010 by Chelonian Research Foundation • Published 14 December 2010 Turtles of the World, 2010 Update: Annotated Checklist of Taxonomy, Synonymy, Distribution, and Conservation Status TUR T LE TAXONOMY WORKING GROUP * *Authorship of this article is by this working group of the IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group, which for the purposes of this document consisted of the following contributors: ANDERS G.J. RHODIN 1, PE T ER PAUL VAN DI J K 2, JOHN B. IVERSON 3, AND H. BRADLEY SHAFFER 4 1Chair, IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group, Chelonian Research Foundation, 168 Goodrich St., Lunenburg, Massachusetts 01462 USA [[email protected]]; 2Deputy Chair, IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group, Conservation International, 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 500, Arlington, Virginia 22202 USA [[email protected]]; 3Department of Biology, Earlham College, Richmond, Indiana 47374 USA [[email protected]]; 4Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, California 95616 USA [[email protected]] AB S T RAC T . – This is our fourth annual compilation of an annotated checklist of all recognized and named taxa of the world’s modern chelonian fauna, documenting recent changes and controversies in nomenclature, and including all primary synonyms, updated from our previous three checklists (Turtle Taxonomy Working Group [2007b, 2009], Rhodin et al.
    [Show full text]
  • 12Th Annual Symposium on the Conservation and Biology of Tortoises and Freshwater Turtles
    Turtle Survival Alliance TSA PROJECTS India: 103 new additions to the 2014 Conference Highlights Sundarbans River Terrapin, Batagur baska, population at Sanjekhali facility in West Keynote Speaker: Arthur Georges Bengal. Arthur Georges, a biologist with a longstanding interest in freshwater turtles, will be our keynote speaker at this year's symposium. Arthur is a leading expert on freshwater turtles in Australia whose work has included projects on turtles in the dune lakes of Fraser Island; arid central Australia ; northern Australian wet-dry tropics with the Aboriginal communities; lowlands of southern Papua New Guinea on the Pig-nosed Madagascar: The largest Turtle ; and now also in the Murray-Darling tortoise confiscation in its Basin, Australia's biggest river. Join us as we history occurred in June when welcome Arthur in Orlando. 968 juvenile Radiated Tortoises (Astrochelys radiata) and one Ploughshare Tortoise Look for Two Book Signings at this Year's Conference! (Astrochelys yniphora) were discovered tightly taped and Peter Lindeman will be signing his Map Turtle and Sawback Atlas: packed in 8 suitcases. Ecology, Evolution, Distribution, and Conservation. Covering all facets of the biology of a little-known genus, Peter‘s lavishly illustrated book is both a scientific treatise and an engaging introduction to a striking group of turtles. Peter details the habitat, diet, reproduction and life history, natural history, and population abundance of each species. David Rostal (lead editor) will be signing the newly released Biology and Conservation of North American Tortoises. While Earl McCoy and Henry Mushinsky (co-editors) won't be able to join us in Orlando,they have pre- Myanmar: TSA/Wildlife signed copies for us! Don‘t miss out on this opportunity to get a copy of this Conservation Society team great new book signed by all three editors.
    [Show full text]
  • Apalone Mutica) Hatchlings
    Herpetological Conservation and Biology 2(1):61-64 Submitted: 5 January 2007; Accepted: 8 April 2007 NEST EMERGENCE OF SMOOTH SOFTSHELL TURTLE (APALONE MUTICA) HATCHLINGS MICHAEL V. PLUMMER Department of Biology, Harding University, Searcy, Arkansas 72143, USA, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract.―I collected eggs from natural nests of Apalone mutica and reburied them in artificial nests constructed in a large outdoor enclosure. Toward the end of a known incubation period, nests were videotaped continuously until hatchlings emerged. Most hatchlings emerged within a short period during a single day. Individuals emerged quickly and singly and maintained brisk movement on the surface after emergence. Emergence times were normally distributed around a median time that corresponded with local sunset. Turtles emerged on sunny days when both nest and surface temperatures were below 36°C and on overcast days when nest and surface temperatures were relatively low and invariable. Timing of nest emergence has fitness consequences for hatchling freshwater turtles. Key Words.―Apalone mutica, emergence; hatchling; nest; sandbar; Smooth Softshell Turtle INTRODUCTION emerged at night or within a few hours after sunset but neither presented quantitative data. I present a quantitative Emergence from the nest may entail high risk for hatchling description of hatchling emergence behavior as exhibited by freshwater turtles. The unavoidable overland dispersal from A. mutica hatchlings in artificial nests constructed in a large the terrestrial nest to water potentially exposes hatchlings to outdoor enclosure. visual predators, temperature extremes, and desiccation; thus, timing of emergence is a biologically significant activity with MATERIALS AND METHODS potentially strong fitness implications for hatching turtles.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Turtle Regulations
    TEXAS TURTLE REGULATIONS Texas Administrative Code TITLE 31 ................. NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION PART 2.................... TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT CHAPTER 65.......... WILDLIFE SUBCHAPTER O.... COMMERCIAL NONGAME PERMITS RULE §65.331 ........ Commercial Activity (a) Policy. The department shall develop a policy for periodic evaluation of pertinent information or evidence to determine if a species should be added to or removed from the lists of species in this section. (b) Turtles. (1) The holder of a nongame permit may possess, transport, sell, import, or export Common Snapping Turtle (Chelydra serpen- tina), Red-eared Slider (Trachemys scripta), or softshell turtle (Apalone spinifera, A. muticus) in accordance with the provi- sions of this subchapter, provided that take occurs on private land or private water. (2) The holder of a nongame dealer’s permit may possess, trans- port, sell, resell, import, or export Common Snapping Turtle (Chelydra serpentina), Red-eared Slider (Trachemys scripta), or softshell turtle (Apalone spinifera, A. muticus) in accordance with the provisions of this subchapter, provided that take occurs on private land or private water. (3) No person while on or in public water may possess or use a net or trap capable of catching a turtle. This section does not apply to: (A) dip nets; or (B) minnow traps, provided the minnow trap is less than 24 inches in length or has a throat smaller than one by three inches. (c) It is an offense for any person to take or attempt to take nongame wildlife for purposes of commercial activity from public land or water. (d) The species of nongame wildlife listed in this paragraph may be possessed, purchased, sold, offered for sale, imported, or exported as provided under this subchapter.
    [Show full text]
  • 8Th Annual Symposium on the Conservation and Biology of Tortoises and Freshwater Turtles | Orlando, Florida 1
    Program Daily Schedules 2010 8th An nual Symposium on the Conservation and Biology of Tortoises and Freshwater Turtles Joint Annual Meeting of the Turtle Survival Alliance and IUCN Tortoise & Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group Program and Abstracts August 16 — 19, 2010 Orlando, Florida Contents should be cited as: Author. 2010. Title. In A. Walde, E.Walton and R. Schaffer (eds.) Program and Abstracts of the Eighth Annual Sumposium on the Conservation and Biology of Tortoises and Frewhwater Turtles. Turtle Survival Alliance, Orlando, FL. pp. xx-xx . 8th Annual Symposium on the Conservation and Biology of Tortoises and Freshwater Turtles | Orlando, Florida 1 Program Abstracts 2010 Captive Reproduction of Madagascar’s Radiated Tortoise (Astrochelys radiata ) at Two U.S. Facilities 1 2 COLETTE HAIRSTON ADAMS AND WILLIAM H. ZOVICKIAN 1Gladys Porter Zoo, Brownsville, Texas, USA [[email protected]] 2Dacula, Georgia, USA Considered by many to be the world’s most beautiful tortoise, the endangered Radiated Tortoise (Astrochelys radiata ) first landed in U.S. collections in numbers during the early 1960s. The first captive hatchings were born in 1973 at the compound of Dr. Bill Zovickian in Colorado Springs, Colorado and at the Gladys Porter Zoo (GPZ) in Brownsville, Texas. Subsequent to that time, both Zovickian and GPZ have produced hundreds of hatchlings. While acknowledging that successful reproduction has since been realized within many other private collections and zoological institutions, this presentation takes a look at the concentrated efforts of these two entities, including the trial and error that has determined many of the husbandry practices utilized today. Techniques proven successful for A.
    [Show full text]