Annex 1 附表1 More Endangered Species Are Brought Into Control 更
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Turtle Monitoring Turtle Notching Image of Turtle Trap
Monitoring Turtles at Nygren Wetland Preserve India John ’12, Beloit College Sustainability Fellows Program [1,2] Summer 2010 Blanding’s Turtle Painted Turtle [1,2] Emydoidea blandingii Chrysemys picta Turtle Monitoring Size: 6-10 inch carapace Habitat: Shallow marshy areas •Four traps made by volunteers set throughout the with abundant submerged preserve vegetation; semi-terrestrial •Traps were checked 3-4 times a week Temperament: Docile and shy •Traps were moved frequently throughout the property Status: State Threatened Species, •Captured turtles were: despite reported sightings, no • weighed Blanding’s turtles have been • measured (plastron and carapace length and width) captured or recorded at Nygren. Plastron (bottom of shell) • notched (Painted Turtles only) of Midland Painted Turtle • released Blanding’s Turtle in Boone County Midland Painted Turtle Photo by: India John Photo by Courtney Schultz Photo by Courtney Schultz Two subspecies in Wisconsin: [1,2] Midland Painted ( Chrysemys picta marginata ) Softshell Turtle Western Painted ( Chrysemys picta bellii ). Apalone Size: 4-8 inch carapace Image Habitat: Marshes and ponds, with dense aquatic vegetation of Temperament: Docile Status: Common; the Western Painted is the turtle most abundant turtle in Wisconsin. Plastron of a Western trap Painted Turtle Photo by India John Snapping Turtle [1,2] Carapace (top of shell) of a Interns India John and Scott Kruger making turtle traps Eastern Spiny Softshell turtle Smooth Softshell turtle Chelydra serpentina Photo by Courtney Schultz Photo by Greg Keilback Photo by India John Two species: Eastern Spiny Softshell (Apalone spinifera ), Turtle Notching Smooth Softshell ( Apalone muticus ) Size: Spiny - carapace: fem. 7 - 18 in., Marked individual turtles by notching the m. -
RELATIVE ABUNDANCE of SPINEY SOFTSHELL TURTLES (Apalone Spinifera) on the MISSOURI and YELLOWSTONE RIVERS in MONTANA FINAL REPOR
RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF SPINEY SOFTSHELL TURTLES (Apalone spinifera) ON THE MISSOURI AND YELLOWSTONE RIVERS IN MONTANA FINAL REPORT Arnold R. Dood, Brad Schmitz, Vic Riggs, Nate McClenning, Matt Jeager, Dave Fuller, Ryan Rauscher, Steve Leathe, Dave Moore, JoAnn Dullum, John Ensign, Scott Story, Mike Backes Abstract In 2003, the Missouri River Natural Resources Committee (MRNRC) Wildlife Section advocated developing a survey for the relative abundance of softshell turtles (Apalone sp.) on the Missouri River system. Softshell turtles were selected because they occur throughout the system and there was some information suggesting that they may have been impacted by system operations. As a common riverine species, there were possibilities that softshell turtles may have been impacted because of the timing, level, and temperature of river flows as well as by dam construction and bank stabilization. In addition, there were reports from other areas in the species range that they may be especially sensitive to human disturbance. From 2004 through 2008, State and Federal agencies and Pacific Power and Light in Montana sampled the Missouri River from Great Falls, MT, to the confluence of the Missouri and Yellowstone (except Fort Peck Reservoir) as well as they Yellowstone River from above Billings to the confluence. Sampling consisted of setting turtle traps every two river miles and checking for three days. Turtles captured were measured, marked, and released. Results of the sampling efforts indicated high relative densities above Fort Peck Reservoir and variable densities on the Yellowstone. No spiny softshells were found below Fort Peck or on the Yellowstone below Sidney, MT. Possible reasons are presented and recommendations for future program direction as well as potential system modifications to benefit this species are discussed. -
Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 100/Tuesday, May 24, 2016/Rules
32664 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 100 / Tuesday, May 24, 2016 / Rules and Regulations Date certain Federal assist- State and location Community Effective date authorization/cancellation of Current effective ance no longer No. sale of flood insurance in community map date available in SFHAs Bonita, Village of, Morehouse Parish ........... 220316 April 3, 1997, Emerg; April 1, 2007, Reg; ......do ............... Do. July 6, 2016, Susp. Collinston, Village of, Morehouse Parish ..... 220399 June 17, 1991, Emerg; N/A, Reg; July 6, ......do ............... Do. 2016, Susp. Mer Rouge, Village of, Morehouse Parish ... 220128 May 3, 1973, Emerg; June 27, 1978, Reg; ......do ............... Do. July 6, 2016, Susp. Morehouse Parish, Unincorporated Areas ... 220367 April 14, 1983, Emerg; October 15, 1985, ......do ............... Do. Reg; July 6, 2016, Susp. New Mexico: Dona Ana County, Unincor- 350012 January 19, 1976, Emerg; September 27, ......do ............... Do. porated Areas. 1991, Reg; July 6, 2016, Susp. Hatch, Village of, Dona Ana County ............ 350013 December 10, 1974, Emerg; January 3, ......do ............... Do. 1986, Reg; July 6, 2016, Susp. Las Cruces, City of, Dona Ana County ........ 355332 July 24, 1970, Emerg; June 11, 1971, Reg; ......do ............... Do. July 6, 2016, Susp. Mesilla, Town of, Dona Ana County ............. 350113 March 7, 1975, Emerg; May 28, 1985, Reg; ......do ............... Do. July 6, 2016, Susp. Sunland Park, City of, Dona Ana County ..... 350147 N/A, Emerg; November 8, 2006, Reg; July ......do ............... Do. 6, 2016, Susp. *.....do = Ditto. Code for reading third column: Emerg. —Emergency; Reg. —Regular; Susp. —Suspension. Dated: May 12, 2016. species (including their subspecies, in September 2010, to discuss the Michael M. -
A Field Guide to South Dakota Turtles
A Field Guide to SOUTH DAKOTA TURTLES EC919 South Dakota State University | Cooperative Extension Service | USDA U.S. Geological Survey | South Dakota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit South Dakota Department of Game, Fish & Parks This publication may be cited as: Bandas, Sarah J., and Kenneth F. Higgins. 2004. Field Guide to South Dakota Turtles. SDCES EC 919. Brookings: South Dakota State University. Copies may be obtained from: Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries Sciences South Dakota State University Box 2140B, NPBL Brookings SD 57007-1696 South Dakota Dept of Game, Fish & Parks 523 E. Capitol, Foss Bldg Pierre SD 57501 SDSU Bulletin Room ACC Box 2231 Brookings, SD 57007 (605) 688–4187 A Field Guide to SOUTH DAKOTA TURTLES EC919 South Dakota State University | Cooperative Extension Service | USDA U.S. Geological Survey | South Dakota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit South Dakota Department of Game, Fish & Parks Sarah J. Bandas Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences South Dakota State University NPB Box 2140B Brookings, SD 57007 Kenneth F. Higgins U.S. Geological Survey South Dakota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit South Dakota State University NPB Box 2140B Brookings, SD 57007 Contents 2 Introduction . .3 Status of South Dakota turtles . .3 Fossil record and evolution . .4 General turtle information . .4 Taxonomy of South Dakota turtles . .9 Capturing techniques . .10 Turtle handling . .10 Turtle habitats . .13 Western Painted Turtle (Chrysemys picta bellii) . .15 Snapping Turtle (Chelydra serpentina) . .17 Spiny Softshell Turtle (Apalone spinifera) . .19 Smooth Softshell Turtle (Apalone mutica) . .23 False Map Turtle (Graptemys pseudogeographica) . .25 Western Ornate Box Turtle (Terrapene ornata ornata) . -
Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 210/Thursday, October 30, 2014
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 210 / Thursday, October 30, 2014 / Proposed Rules 64553 incremental NGCC generation identified generation levels. Together, the same information sources and presented under building block 2 (given that under approach in the proposal and the in the same format as the 2012 dataset the proposal, generation from building alternative approach in this document used for the June 2014 proposed rule. block 2 was assumed to reduce carbon reflect a range of possible emission rate We are also making these data available intensity by replacing generation from impacts that could be expected through at: http://www2.epa.gov/ 2012 levels). The rationale for this the application of the incremental RE cleanpowerplan/. approach would be that the BSER for all and EE in the state goal calculation. The Dated: October 27, 2014. fossil generation includes replacing that EPA is seeking comment on which Janet G. McCabe, generation with incremental RE and EE. approach better reflects the BSER. At Moreover, this approach acknowledges the same time, we note that the Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Air and Radiation. that, taken by itself, such incremental alternative state goal formula generation would not necessarily approaches listed here may raise a [FR Doc. 2014–25845 Filed 10–29–14; 8:45 am] replace the highest-emitting generation, number of additional considerations. BILLING CODE 6560–50–P but would likely replace a mix of These approaches, for example, would existing fossil generating technologies. increase the collective stringency of the b. Prioritize replacement of historical state goals, which would likely increase DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR fossil steam generation. -
Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2013–0052]
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 05/24/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-11201, and on FDsys.gov Billing Code 4333–15 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 23 [Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2013–0052] RIN 1018–AZ53 Inclusion of Four Native U.S. Freshwater Turtle Species in Appendix III of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), are listing the common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina), Florida softshell turtle (Apalone ferox), smooth softshell turtle (Apalone mutica), and spiny softshell turtle (Apalone spinifera) in Appendix 1 III of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES or Convention), including live and dead whole specimens, and all readily recognizable parts, products, and derivatives. Listing these four native U.S. freshwater turtle species (including their subspecies, except Apalone spinifera atra, which is already included in Appendix I of CITES) in Appendix III of CITES is necessary to allow us to adequately monitor international trade in these species; to determine whether exports are occurring legally, with respect to State and Federal law; and to determine whether further measures under CITES or other laws are required to conserve these species and their subspecies. DATES: This listing is effective [INSERT DATE 180 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: You may obtain information about permits for international trade in these species and their subspecies by contacting the U.S. -
Chelonian Advisory Group Regional Collection Plan 4Th Edition December 2015
Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) Chelonian Advisory Group Regional Collection Plan 4th Edition December 2015 Editor Chelonian TAG Steering Committee 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Mission ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Steering Committee Structure ........................................................................................................... 3 Officers, Steering Committee Members, and Advisors ..................................................................... 4 Taxonomic Scope ............................................................................................................................. 6 Space Analysis Space .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Survey ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Current and Potential Holding Table Results ............................................................................. 8 Species Selection Process Process ..................................................................................................................................... 11 Decision Tree ........................................................................................................................... 13 Decision Tree Results ............................................................................................................. -
Turtles of the World, 2010 Update: Annotated Checklist of Taxonomy, Synonymy, Distribution, and Conservation Status
Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation ProjectTurtles of the IUCN/SSC of the World Tortoise – 2010and Freshwater Checklist Turtle Specialist Group 000.85 A.G.J. Rhodin, P.C.H. Pritchard, P.P. van Dijk, R.A. Saumure, K.A. Buhlmann, J.B. Iverson, and R.A. Mittermeier, Eds. Chelonian Research Monographs (ISSN 1088-7105) No. 5, doi:10.3854/crm.5.000.checklist.v3.2010 © 2010 by Chelonian Research Foundation • Published 14 December 2010 Turtles of the World, 2010 Update: Annotated Checklist of Taxonomy, Synonymy, Distribution, and Conservation Status TUR T LE TAXONOMY WORKING GROUP * *Authorship of this article is by this working group of the IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group, which for the purposes of this document consisted of the following contributors: ANDERS G.J. RHODIN 1, PE T ER PAUL VAN DI J K 2, JOHN B. IVERSON 3, AND H. BRADLEY SHAFFER 4 1Chair, IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group, Chelonian Research Foundation, 168 Goodrich St., Lunenburg, Massachusetts 01462 USA [[email protected]]; 2Deputy Chair, IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group, Conservation International, 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 500, Arlington, Virginia 22202 USA [[email protected]]; 3Department of Biology, Earlham College, Richmond, Indiana 47374 USA [[email protected]]; 4Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, California 95616 USA [[email protected]] AB S T RAC T . – This is our fourth annual compilation of an annotated checklist of all recognized and named taxa of the world’s modern chelonian fauna, documenting recent changes and controversies in nomenclature, and including all primary synonyms, updated from our previous three checklists (Turtle Taxonomy Working Group [2007b, 2009], Rhodin et al. -
12Th Annual Symposium on the Conservation and Biology of Tortoises and Freshwater Turtles
Turtle Survival Alliance TSA PROJECTS India: 103 new additions to the 2014 Conference Highlights Sundarbans River Terrapin, Batagur baska, population at Sanjekhali facility in West Keynote Speaker: Arthur Georges Bengal. Arthur Georges, a biologist with a longstanding interest in freshwater turtles, will be our keynote speaker at this year's symposium. Arthur is a leading expert on freshwater turtles in Australia whose work has included projects on turtles in the dune lakes of Fraser Island; arid central Australia ; northern Australian wet-dry tropics with the Aboriginal communities; lowlands of southern Papua New Guinea on the Pig-nosed Madagascar: The largest Turtle ; and now also in the Murray-Darling tortoise confiscation in its Basin, Australia's biggest river. Join us as we history occurred in June when welcome Arthur in Orlando. 968 juvenile Radiated Tortoises (Astrochelys radiata) and one Ploughshare Tortoise Look for Two Book Signings at this Year's Conference! (Astrochelys yniphora) were discovered tightly taped and Peter Lindeman will be signing his Map Turtle and Sawback Atlas: packed in 8 suitcases. Ecology, Evolution, Distribution, and Conservation. Covering all facets of the biology of a little-known genus, Peter‘s lavishly illustrated book is both a scientific treatise and an engaging introduction to a striking group of turtles. Peter details the habitat, diet, reproduction and life history, natural history, and population abundance of each species. David Rostal (lead editor) will be signing the newly released Biology and Conservation of North American Tortoises. While Earl McCoy and Henry Mushinsky (co-editors) won't be able to join us in Orlando,they have pre- Myanmar: TSA/Wildlife signed copies for us! Don‘t miss out on this opportunity to get a copy of this Conservation Society team great new book signed by all three editors. -
Apalone Mutica) Hatchlings
Herpetological Conservation and Biology 2(1):61-64 Submitted: 5 January 2007; Accepted: 8 April 2007 NEST EMERGENCE OF SMOOTH SOFTSHELL TURTLE (APALONE MUTICA) HATCHLINGS MICHAEL V. PLUMMER Department of Biology, Harding University, Searcy, Arkansas 72143, USA, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract.―I collected eggs from natural nests of Apalone mutica and reburied them in artificial nests constructed in a large outdoor enclosure. Toward the end of a known incubation period, nests were videotaped continuously until hatchlings emerged. Most hatchlings emerged within a short period during a single day. Individuals emerged quickly and singly and maintained brisk movement on the surface after emergence. Emergence times were normally distributed around a median time that corresponded with local sunset. Turtles emerged on sunny days when both nest and surface temperatures were below 36°C and on overcast days when nest and surface temperatures were relatively low and invariable. Timing of nest emergence has fitness consequences for hatchling freshwater turtles. Key Words.―Apalone mutica, emergence; hatchling; nest; sandbar; Smooth Softshell Turtle INTRODUCTION emerged at night or within a few hours after sunset but neither presented quantitative data. I present a quantitative Emergence from the nest may entail high risk for hatchling description of hatchling emergence behavior as exhibited by freshwater turtles. The unavoidable overland dispersal from A. mutica hatchlings in artificial nests constructed in a large the terrestrial nest to water potentially exposes hatchlings to outdoor enclosure. visual predators, temperature extremes, and desiccation; thus, timing of emergence is a biologically significant activity with MATERIALS AND METHODS potentially strong fitness implications for hatching turtles. -
Texas Turtle Regulations
TEXAS TURTLE REGULATIONS Texas Administrative Code TITLE 31 ................. NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION PART 2.................... TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT CHAPTER 65.......... WILDLIFE SUBCHAPTER O.... COMMERCIAL NONGAME PERMITS RULE §65.331 ........ Commercial Activity (a) Policy. The department shall develop a policy for periodic evaluation of pertinent information or evidence to determine if a species should be added to or removed from the lists of species in this section. (b) Turtles. (1) The holder of a nongame permit may possess, transport, sell, import, or export Common Snapping Turtle (Chelydra serpen- tina), Red-eared Slider (Trachemys scripta), or softshell turtle (Apalone spinifera, A. muticus) in accordance with the provi- sions of this subchapter, provided that take occurs on private land or private water. (2) The holder of a nongame dealer’s permit may possess, trans- port, sell, resell, import, or export Common Snapping Turtle (Chelydra serpentina), Red-eared Slider (Trachemys scripta), or softshell turtle (Apalone spinifera, A. muticus) in accordance with the provisions of this subchapter, provided that take occurs on private land or private water. (3) No person while on or in public water may possess or use a net or trap capable of catching a turtle. This section does not apply to: (A) dip nets; or (B) minnow traps, provided the minnow trap is less than 24 inches in length or has a throat smaller than one by three inches. (c) It is an offense for any person to take or attempt to take nongame wildlife for purposes of commercial activity from public land or water. (d) The species of nongame wildlife listed in this paragraph may be possessed, purchased, sold, offered for sale, imported, or exported as provided under this subchapter. -
8Th Annual Symposium on the Conservation and Biology of Tortoises and Freshwater Turtles | Orlando, Florida 1
Program Daily Schedules 2010 8th An nual Symposium on the Conservation and Biology of Tortoises and Freshwater Turtles Joint Annual Meeting of the Turtle Survival Alliance and IUCN Tortoise & Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group Program and Abstracts August 16 — 19, 2010 Orlando, Florida Contents should be cited as: Author. 2010. Title. In A. Walde, E.Walton and R. Schaffer (eds.) Program and Abstracts of the Eighth Annual Sumposium on the Conservation and Biology of Tortoises and Frewhwater Turtles. Turtle Survival Alliance, Orlando, FL. pp. xx-xx . 8th Annual Symposium on the Conservation and Biology of Tortoises and Freshwater Turtles | Orlando, Florida 1 Program Abstracts 2010 Captive Reproduction of Madagascar’s Radiated Tortoise (Astrochelys radiata ) at Two U.S. Facilities 1 2 COLETTE HAIRSTON ADAMS AND WILLIAM H. ZOVICKIAN 1Gladys Porter Zoo, Brownsville, Texas, USA [[email protected]] 2Dacula, Georgia, USA Considered by many to be the world’s most beautiful tortoise, the endangered Radiated Tortoise (Astrochelys radiata ) first landed in U.S. collections in numbers during the early 1960s. The first captive hatchings were born in 1973 at the compound of Dr. Bill Zovickian in Colorado Springs, Colorado and at the Gladys Porter Zoo (GPZ) in Brownsville, Texas. Subsequent to that time, both Zovickian and GPZ have produced hundreds of hatchlings. While acknowledging that successful reproduction has since been realized within many other private collections and zoological institutions, this presentation takes a look at the concentrated efforts of these two entities, including the trial and error that has determined many of the husbandry practices utilized today. Techniques proven successful for A.