U.S. Lake Survey Nautical Charts

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

U.S. Lake Survey Nautical Charts i 4 'I waI‘MhfihfiHflw 3355 23333 . I .‘n ' 5"‘~~"'ll '55» "3 . :3 , 5 5 5-, ‘53, '3 5I 5II‘IIII'I5 55 IIII'III 5,33,, I. 55 5: 553' 33,, '3‘5 ,,I:,I.,1535 I I ‘5555‘ ‘ 5,53‘IIII‘I ‘IIl'i “I“ “3'“ I‘ll," ‘3‘ s; 5,5,5,,I~ 55,5 3 ”fl” WINIm"w‘ ‘33, 5,51'51‘315333‘3 ‘ 3“l “"‘l ‘3 353133,: 3535 ,5. 5,3,3 I“ 3 55,51!" “311"," 3" ‘ :5" ,55:, 3 5,531 v 5131.5 HIRHIIII“: IIIIfxE 5 'ILI .313151. ‘ v, 5“ 32,333,33‘ 353533“: ‘44 5313:; '1' ,. 'Itgi'g I . 5 , ' I ‘. if I ' 3,33" -‘ .i '5 5.4;: L33 . 353-. 18:, - , 24' “I 1', \335; f3 ‘I {31, ' 5 33‘ 333‘, v. t - ‘3'; ".jj ' - '. - IEII: . ‘) . I’I‘av'ali .;I ~ . i , "S. I 5 g 1.. LI?” 3‘ ‘i 35553.~ L I ‘ ' 333%355 ‘ '. 5555 31.3535 3 {$31 55.1”“ 5 I o‘i‘!‘ 2&3: II$II~ .- 3 1‘: 3'13, I {I ' “51‘"? . q “.5 1! ~33 31,3I I :31013. :3 Ln; -. 5335331*31*3E5:.fi ,1; . .51, -,.: ‘ ', "' :L3»L.=. ..- .. ,1:i' '1: 3 .51: 3333-3333113 5.1.1,. ,5,.,,:3,9,3; £5,533 53,555,, 5 5 . .5' :52 - ‘ . ' -- , ::- 5143,3235!” ,1 53.55531 ‘33; I 2 t‘ 1;..30: 5:23;; .. 1“ 3w. ' i 1;,‘ I 3 h :1. "5 ' I I ”III ' - -, , -I -- ““,u“ 33 '12. ‘II 5.: - ‘I ‘. ‘ 5 . H “I, “ I ' ‘53 5“,“,5' 5'5‘II,.I 5 5"551 ‘ 3' . ‘ 5 '55 5 ,.,. 2ll“ 5“, ‘3‘. "HIV “ I'll"! " 0 l0 'I'I‘u I " ‘ H‘ ' 5, I“: 5‘,:.-1 515'. .55 53'3”; ‘5 '33:;3' 3:53.; ,|,5' 55313;::.5 1‘ 5 555. 53" .‘I ,5 -!°:I' 1 ‘ 5, " ' , "" "~:‘,‘,-, "fig-"“I‘m’ JEIII'II,I,5,L ,‘J ,5" , 5'I‘l I~ .., IIIL”. Ill '11::11313433” :i'H' 1" {I .13“ EII 563 .‘ SS“; '3‘ 5H 5:, .I,,5,5 ,,1 ”-1, : 5 . “' ,3;:;,'~5I355-,1,15,3'5”| 55|.I,', I335“ ‘ “,35‘ ‘ ”I 3.3, 3" ,3 ' l . b'III‘I“ M} I‘III‘r‘ IIIII ' ".lI‘L '3“'~':J«ww3.:3‘ 1: 155‘: 55"" "‘3 35. 1;, 33333 ‘33“ 15,315.31, ‘3 ‘1:— was sfl ‘ name? Co BEIGE”. 3 5.339 E University J K y._ This is to certify that the thesis entitled U. S. LAKE SURVEY NAUTICAL CHARTS: THE INFLUENCE OF TRADITION presented by Deborah Ann Johnson has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for M.A. degree injengnanhL WW Major professor DateMl’flg 07639 ‘bv1531—J RETURNING MATERIALS: Place in book drop to ”saunas remove this Checkout from “ your record. FINES will be charged if book is returned after the date stamped below. U. S. LAKE SURVEY NAUTICAL CHARTS: THE INFLUENCE OF TRADITION By Deborah Ann Johnson A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Department of Geography 1982 ABSTRACT U. S. LAKE SURVEY NAUTICAL CHARTS: THE INFLUENCE OF TRADITION 133’ Deborah Ann Johnson Tradition has had a great influence on cartography. Conventional map symbols have developed over many centuries to improve the uniformity and utility of cartographic communication, especially for reference maps. This study examines the influence of tradition on the cartographic deveIOpment of the nautical charts of the Great Lakes produced by the U. S. Lake Survey from 18M to 1970. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thoroughly enjoyed my graduate studies in cartography at Michigan State University, thanks to many people. Dr. Richard Groop provided valuable assistance on my thesis and cartographic studies, and managed to make cartography not only interesting but entertaining, due in part to his somewhat peculiar and jaded sense of humor. Mike Lipsey made production cartography very enjoyable and worthwhile, and working at the Cartography Center with Mike and other assorted cartographers was one of the best experiences I've had at M. S. U. Also deserving a note of appreciation are Dr. "Chip" Dipp and Professor G. Hbssifats ("Jump on In"), probably the most respected and reknowned scholars in the Geography Department at M. S. U., and the many great friends who made student life most entertaining. Now that I've left the five-foot raccoons of East Lansing behind for farm life on the Great Plains in Loomis, Nebraska, I'm proud to say that I graduated from M. S. U. with an M. A. degree, an M. R. S. degree, and an M. 0. M. degree. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES iv LIST OF FIGURES CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION Nautical Chart Symbolization Development of the U. S. Lake Survey 15 Background and the Development of the Research Problem 19 Methodology 20 Footnotes Chapter One 23 CHAPTER TWO HISTORY OF THE U. S. LAKE SURVEY MAPPING ACTIVITIES 1841-1970 Introduction 18A1—1882 The Initial Survey Field Work Office Work 1889-1911 Resumption of the Lake Survey Formulation of the General Project of 1907 Chart Project of 1909 1911-19A8 Expansion of Operations Reformulation of the Chart Project 1948-1970 The Modern Period Footnotes Chapter Two CHAPTER THREE CARTOGRARHIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE LAKE SURVEY CHARTS Introduction 18h1-1882 The Initial Survey 1889-1911 Resumption of the Lake Survey 1911-19A8 Expansion of Operations 1948—1970 The Modern Period The Influence of Tradition on the Lake Survey Charts APPENDIX A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF U. S. LAKE SURVEY CHARTS 18‘51-1970 LIST OF REFERENCES 135 iii LIST OF TABLES 1. Sample Lake Survey Charts 50 2. Cartographic Development of the Lake Survey Charts 74 iv LIST OF FIGURES 1. U. S. Lake Survey chart of Ontonagon Harbor, 1859. 2. U. S. Lake Survey chart No. #3 of St. Clair River, 1966. 3. Lead-line soundings on part of a nautical chart. u. Depth profiles by echo sounder on a nautical chart. s. Multiple depth profiles represented on a nautical chart. 6. Soundings from a full hydrographic survey. \l\10\O\-¥=’\fl 7. Standard symbols for buoys and beacons from Chart No. 1 Nautical Chart Symbolg and Abbreviations, 8. Standard chart symbols for dangers to navigation. 1o 9. Standard coastline symbols. 12 1o. Standard symbols for coast features and natural features. 13 11. Standard abbreviations for bottom characteristics. 1h 12. U. S. Coast Survey chart of Anacapa Island, 1854. 16 13. Chart of Toronto Harbor, 1816, by H. W. Bayfield 28 14. Chart of Lake Huron, 1:400,000, 1860. 52 15. Chart of Saginaw Bay, 1:120,000, 1860. 53 16. Chart of St. Clair River, 1:40,000, 1872. 5h 17. Chart of Ontonagon Harbor, 1:16.000, 1859. 55 18. Portion of chart of Ontonagon Harbor, 1:16,000, 1859. 57 19. Pertion of chart of St. Clair River, 1:h0,000, 1872. 58 20. Insets on charts of Ontonagon Harbor and Eagle Harbor. 59 21. Chart No. 765 of Holland Harbor, 1:15,000, 1912. 61 Chart No. 52 of Lake Huron, 1:120,000, 1936. 6h V 23. Chart No. #3 of St. Clair River, 1:40,000, 1934. 65 29. Chart No. 711 of Manistique Harbor, 1:10,000, 1925. 66 25. Chart No. 5 of Lake Huron, 1:500,000, 1967. 68 26. Chart No. 52 of Lake Huron, 1:120,000, 1967. 69 27. Chart No. #3 of St. Clair River, 1:#0,000, 1966. 70 28. Chart No. 763 of Holland Harbor, 1:15,000, 1966. 71 29a. Index map of general charts of the Great Lakes. 127 29b. Index map of charts of St. Lawrence River, Lake Champlain, and New York State Barge Canal System. 128 29c. Index map of charts of Lake Ontario and lower Niagara River.129 29d. Index map of charts of Lake Erie, Niagara River, Detroit River, Lake St. Clair, and St. Clair River. 130 29e. Index map of charts of Lake Huron, Straits of Mackinac, and St. Marys River. 131 29f. Index map of charts of Lake Michigan. 132 29g. Index map of charts of Lake Superior. 13} 29h. Index map of charts of Minnesota-Ontario Border Lakes. '13A vi CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION Tradition has played an important role in cartography, and conventional map symbols have developed over many centuries to provide uniformity, continuity. and simplified cartographic communi- cation. Traditional symbols have been especially useful on general or reference maps such as topographic maps and nautical charts which provide detailed, highly accurate locational information, and many of the symbols used on these maps have become standardized. Traditional symbols have also been developed for thematic maps such as population maps which portray spatial distributions and relationships; but convention has been less important, and inno- vative and imaginative symbolism has often been used to create unusual thematic maps. The role of tradition in cartography is particularly evident in the development of nautical charts. Nautical charts have been used for centuries to aid mariners in determining courses and positions at sea. As early as the sixteenth century EurOpean chartmakers introduced standard symbols to represent safe anchorage, buoys, and submerged rocks. Nautical charts kept pace with advances in navigation and cartography, but conventional symbols were preferred and the only major changes in their development were greater accuracy and improved map legibility. This study examines the influence of tradition on the 1 2 cartographic development of the nautical charts of the Great Lakes published by the U. S. Lake Survey over a span of more than 125 years. The earliest Lake Survey charts were black and white litho- graphic prints produced in the mid-nineteenth century with cumbersome printing methods and unsophisticated surveying equipment (Figure 1), while most recent charts are'color prints produced on modern offset presses and compiled from data obtained with echo sounding, electronic positioning, and aerial photography (Figure 2).
Recommended publications
  • Great Lakes Islands: Biodiversity Elements And
    GREAT LAKES ISLANDS: BIODIVERSITY ELEMENTS AND THREATS A FINAL REPORT TO THE GREAT LAKES NATIONAL PROGRAM OFFICE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AUGUST 6, 2007 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Funding for this project has been provided by the Great Lakes Program Office (GLNPO) of the Environmental Protection Agency (Grant No. Gl-96521901: Framework for the Binational Conservation of Great Lakes Islands). We especially appreciated the support of our project officer, K. Rodriquez, and G. Gulezian, director of the GLNPO. Project team members were F. Cuthbert (University of Minnesota), D. Ewert (The Nature Conservancy), R. Greenwood (U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service), D. Kraus (The Nature Conservancy of Canada), M. Seymour (U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service), K. Vigmostad (Principal Investigator, formerly of Northeast-Midwest Institute), and L. Wires (University of Minnesota). Team members for the Ontario portion of the project included W. Bakowsky (NHIC), B. Crins (Ontario Parks), J. Mackenzie (NHIC) and M. McMurtry (NHIC). GIS and technical support for this project has been provided by T. Krahn (Provincial Geomatics Service Centre, OMNR), J. Slatts (The Nature Conservancy), and G. White (The Nature Conservancy of Canada). Many others have provided scientific and policy support for this project. We particularly want to recognize M. DePhillips (The Nature Conservancy), G. Jackson (Parks Canada), B. Manny (Great Lakes Science Center), and C. Vasarhelyi (policy consultant). Cover photograph: A Bay on Gibraltar Island (Lake Erie) ©2005 Karen E. Vigmostad 2 Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions
    United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness Visitors and Forest Service Recreation Impacts: Baseline Rocky Mountain Research Station Data Available for Twentieth General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-117 Century Conditions September 2003 David N. Cole Vita Wright Abstract __________________________________________ Cole, David N.; Wright, Vita. 2003. Wilderness visitors and recreation impacts: baseline data available for twentieth century conditions. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-117. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 52 p. This report provides an assessment and compilation of recreation-related monitoring data sources across the National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS). Telephone interviews with managers of all units of the NWPS and a literature search were conducted to locate studies that provide campsite impact data, trail impact data, and information about visitor characteristics. Of the 628 wildernesses that comprised the NWPS in January 2000, 51 percent had baseline campsite data, 9 percent had trail condition data and 24 percent had data on visitor characteristics. Wildernesses managed by the Forest Service and National Park Service were much more likely to have data than wildernesses managed by the Bureau of Land Management and Fish and Wildlife Service. Both unpublished data collected by the management agencies and data published in reports are included. Extensive appendices provide detailed information about available data for every study that we located. These have been organized by wilderness so that it is easy to locate all the information available for each wilderness in the NWPS. Keywords: campsite condition, monitoring, National Wilderness Preservation System, trail condition, visitor characteristics The Authors _______________________________________ David N.
    [Show full text]
  • S T a T E O F N E W Y O R K 3695--A 2009-2010
    S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 3695--A 2009-2010 Regular Sessions I N A S S E M B L Y January 28, 2009 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. ENGLEBRIGHT -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M. of A. KOON, McENENY -- read once and referred to the Committee on Tourism, Arts and Sports Development -- recommitted to the Committee on Tour- ism, Arts and Sports Development in accordance with Assembly Rule 3, sec. 2 -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee AN ACT to amend the parks, recreation and historic preservation law, in relation to the protection and management of the state park system THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: 1 Section 1. Legislative findings and purpose. The legislature finds the 2 New York state parks, and natural and cultural lands under state manage- 3 ment which began with the Niagara Reservation in 1885 embrace unique, 4 superlative and significant resources. They constitute a major source of 5 pride, inspiration and enjoyment of the people of the state, and have 6 gained international recognition and acclaim. 7 Establishment of the State Council of Parks by the legislature in 1924 8 was an act that created the first unified state parks system in the 9 country. By this act and other means the legislature and the people of 10 the state have repeatedly expressed their desire that the natural and 11 cultural state park resources of the state be accorded the highest 12 degree of protection.
    [Show full text]
  • NOAA Great Lakes Charts Catalog Reference
    Charts on the Great Lakes and Adjacent Waters 96° 94° Data On the Great Lakes System Chart Number Title Scale Chart Number Title Scale Chart Number Title Scale LAKE LAKE LAKE LAKE LAKE LAKE 14500 Great Lakes—Lake Champlain to Lake of the Woods 1:1,500,000 14847 Toledo Harbor 1:20,000 14915 Little Bay de Noc 1:30,000 GENERAL LAKE DIMENSION SUPERIOR MICHIGAN HURON ST. CLAIR ERIE ONTARIO ST. LAWRENCE RIVER Entrance Channel 1:40,000 14916 SMALL-CRAFT BOOK CHART Length in miles 350 307 206 26 241 193 14770 Morristown, N.Y. to Butternut Bay, Ont. 1:15,000 14848 Detroit River 1:30,000 Lake Winnebago and Lower Fox River (book of 34 charts) Various 14850 Lake St. Clair 1:60,000 14917 Menominee and Marinette Harbors 1:15,000 14500 Breadth in miles 160 118(1) 183(2) 24 57 53 14771 Butternut Bay, Ont., to Ironsides lsland., N.Y. 1:15,000 Length in coastline (including islands) 2,730 1,640 3,830(3) 257 871 712 14772 Ironsides lsland, N.Y., to Bingham lsland, Ont. 1:15,000 14852 St. Clair River 1:40,000 14918 Head of Green Bay, including Fox River below De Pere 1:25,000 Area in square miles 14773 Gananoque, Ont., to St. Lawrence Park. N.Y. 1:15,000 Head of St. Clair River 1:15,000 Green Bay 1:10,000 1450 Water Surface, United States 20,600(4) 22,300(5) 9,150(6) 198(7) 4,980 3,560(8) 14774 Round lsland, N.Y., and Gananoque, Ont., to Wolfe l., Ont.
    [Show full text]
  • Wiikwedong Dazhi-Ojibwe
    WIIKWEDONG DAZHI-OJIBWE The Keweenaw Bay Ojibwe Waabigwani Giizis – Flower Moon - May 2019 Issue 178 KBIC TRIBAL VETERANS WIIKWEDONG OGICHIDAA SOCIETY Tribal Council Members: HONOR GUARD PROUDLY ACCEPTS THE GIFT OF TWO SCOOTERS Warren C. Swartz, Jr., President Gary F. Loonsfoot, Jr., Vice-President Susan J. LaFernier, Secretary Toni J. Minton, Asst. Secretary Doreen G. Blaker, Treasurer Robert R.D. Curtis, Jr. Dale Goodreau Randall R. Haataja Kim Klopstein Michael F. LaFernier, Sr. Rodney Loonsfoot Elizabeth D. Mayo SPECIAL POINTS OF INTEREST Wiikwedong Ogichidaa Society Veterans gifted scooters KBOCSS visits local schools (Left to right) Proudly displaying the organizations new scooters are KBIC Tribal Veterans Wiikwedong with Easter Bunny Ogichidaa Society Honor Guard Members: Allen Gauthier, Joseph Eckerberg, Rodney Loonsfoot, and Joseph Dowd. Spring Quarterly Council Meet- ing held The KBIC Tribal Veterans Wiikwe- Bringing Easter Joy in our Schools dong Ogichidaa Society Honor Guard KBIC attends NMU Powwow proudly displayed two new scooters KBIC AIS Program Activities they received on Saturday, April 13, 2019. The Veterans’ scooters were KBIC Health Systems Updates made possible through the Wounded Criminal Report Warriors Family Support Network wwfs.org. (Left) Khloe Loonsfoot shares a stroll down Rodney Loonsfoot, Tribal Council/ Baraga Elementary School hall with the Veteran Service Representative, began school’s surprise visitor, Easter Bunny! the process last year through applica- tion. The Tribe had to have an accred- KBIC Office of Child Support Ser- ited service officer who is recognized vices Outreach visited the Baraga by the Veterans Administration. KBIC and L’Anse schools on April 18, met all the eligibility requirements and 2019, along with the Easter Bunny.
    [Show full text]
  • Seaway Story JA09.Qxd:Feature MASTER
    INLAND SUPERHIGHWAY For half a century, the St. Lawrence Seaway has served as a critical artery for ships carrying the coal, grain and iron ore that fuelled Canada’s economy. But a sea change may be brewing. BY D’ARCY JENISH WITH PHOTOGRAPHY BY MARTIN BEAULIEU With three blasts of its horn — two long and one Fifty years is a major milestone, yet the short, a traditional maritime greeting — the CSL Spruceglen sails into the St. Lambert Lock, on the eastern shore of the speeches are brief and businesslike. St. Lawrence River, opposite downtown Montréal. It’s just after noon on March 31, 2009, and right on schedule, the After stopping for less than an hour at Wfreighter glides to a stop. Deckhands feed thick, braided steel lines to a pair of lockmen, who secure the ship. The lock the St. Lambert Lock, the Spruceglen operator opens a set of intake valves, each large enough to accommodate a compact car, and millions of litres of water resumes its journey. rush into the chamber. As the ship rises — it will be lifted about five metres in less than 10 minutes — the port side of its hull forms an imposing black wall that cuts off our view of Parc Mont-Royal and the Montréal skyline. The Spruceglen is 222.5 metres long and 23 metres wide, and it fits into the 24.4-metre-wide lock like a hand in a glove. Deckhands lower a gangplank, and two smartly dressed officers disembark. Captain Mark Dillon and Chief The CSL Spruceglen Engineer Christian Pelletier are wearing navy blue suits (TOP) breaks a blue with crisp white shirts and neatly knotted, matching blue ties.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Sturgeon Assessment by Great Lakes Commercial Fishers 2001
    Lake Sturgeon Assessment Assistance by Great Lakes Commercial Fishers 2001-2002 March 2003 Emily C. Zollweg, Editor, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Lower Great Lakes Fishery Resources Office, 405 N. French Rd, Suite 120A, Amherst, New York 14228, USA; (716) 691-5456; FAX (716) 691-6154; [email protected] Brian J. Gunderman and Robert F. Elliott, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Green Bay Fishery Resources Office, 2661 Scott Tower Drive, New Franken, Wisconsin 54229, USA; (920) 866-1755; FAX (920) 866-1710; [email protected], [email protected] Adam Kowalski and Tracy D. Hill, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Alpena Fishery Resources Office, 145 Water St., Alpena, Michigan 49707, USA; (989) 356- 5102; FAX (989) 356-6154; [email protected], [email protected] Glenn Miller, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ashland Fishery Resources Office, 2800 Lakeshore Drive East, Ashland, Wisconsin 54806, USA; (715) 682-6185; FAX (715) 682-8899; [email protected] ABSTRACT Currently there is no commercial fishing for lake sturgeon, (Acipenser fulvescens), in U. S. waters of the Great Lakes and sport fishing is limited. Canada allows commercial harvest from Ontario waters of Lake Huron only. Lake sturgeon is considered threatened or endangered by 19 of the 20 states within its original range in the U.S. Lake sturgeon abundance was reduced dramatically in the late 1800’s by commercial overfishing and habitat degradation. The life history characteristics of lake sturgeon, late maturity and infrequent spawning after maturity, prevent populations from rebounding quickly after such catastrophes. Fishery agencies are providing training and equipment to commercial fishers for data collection from lake sturgeon.
    [Show full text]
  • Shipwreck Journaljournal — Page 3 Journal of the Great Lakes Shipwreck Historical Society Spring / Summer 2012 • Volume 30 No
    Whitefish Point History is Alive at ShipwreckShipwreck JournalJournal — page 3 Journal of the Great Lakes Shipwreck Historical Society Spring / Summer 2012 • Volume 30 No. 1 / 2 R.V. David Boyd Launched for 2012 Shipwreck Hunting (Story on Page 2) R.V. David Boyd is launched into the St. Marys River at the Cloverland Hydroelectric Plant in Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan, June 29, 2012. PHOTO BY BRUCE LYNN Featured Whitefish Point Shipwreck Search The Shipwreck Special Events in this Issue: Homecomings • by Sea & Air • Coast’s First Victim • at Whitefish Point Whitefish Point Homecomings It is amazing how many shipping, lighthouse, Hagan also contacted some of his former and lifesaving station stories along Superior’s Coast Guard crew to solicit information. He Shipwreck Coast bring a focus to Whitefish Point. contacted Chuck Nemmo, who served with him at Visitors often bring personal and family history to Whitefish for 2 years. In addition, he tried to contact share with us and to help enrich our historical re- Terry Repking, whom he later found out had passed cords. I frequently get requests from front-line staff away in March 1993 leaving 2 young daughters to rush over to the museum to meet a guest with a behind. Dennis commented that “Sometimes look- story. I must say these are very rewarding encounters ing for people isn’t all that much fun.” Chroniclers because we get a chance to learn from recollections of history come face to face with the fact that we are and pictures of actual people who served along the here but a brief moment in time in the big scheme of coast.
    [Show full text]
  • 22 AUG 2021 Index Acadia Rock 14967
    19 SEP 2021 Index 543 Au Sable Point 14863 �� � � � � 324, 331 Belle Isle 14976 � � � � � � � � � 493 Au Sable Point 14962, 14963 �� � � � 468 Belle Isle, MI 14853, 14848 � � � � � 290 Index Au Sable River 14863 � � � � � � � 331 Belle River 14850� � � � � � � � � 301 Automated Mutual Assistance Vessel Res- Belle River 14852, 14853� � � � � � 308 cue System (AMVER)� � � � � 13 Bellevue Island 14882 �� � � � � � � 346 Automatic Identification System (AIS) Aids Bellow Island 14913 � � � � � � � 363 A to Navigation � � � � � � � � 12 Belmont Harbor 14926, 14928 � � � 407 Au Train Bay 14963 � � � � � � � � 469 Benson Landing 14784 � � � � � � 500 Acadia Rock 14967, 14968 � � � � � 491 Au Train Island 14963 � � � � � � � 469 Benton Harbor, MI 14930 � � � � � 381 Adams Point 14864, 14880 �� � � � � 336 Au Train Point 14969 � � � � � � � 469 Bete Grise Bay 14964 � � � � � � � 475 Agate Bay 14966 �� � � � � � � � � 488 Avon Point 14826� � � � � � � � � 259 Betsie Lake 14907 � � � � � � � � 368 Agate Harbor 14964� � � � � � � � 476 Betsie River 14907 � � � � � � � � 368 Agriculture, Department of� � � � 24, 536 B Biddle Point 14881 �� � � � � � � � 344 Ahnapee River 14910 � � � � � � � 423 Biddle Point 14911 �� � � � � � � � 444 Aids to navigation � � � � � � � � � 10 Big Bay 14932 �� � � � � � � � � � 379 Baby Point 14852� � � � � � � � � 306 Air Almanac � � � � � � � � � � � 533 Big Bay 14963, 14964 �� � � � � � � 471 Bad River 14863, 14867 � � � � � � 327 Alabaster, MI 14863 � � � � � � � � 330 Big Bay 14967 �� � � � � � � � � � 490 Baileys
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices Section
    APPENDIX 1. A Selection of Biodiversity Conservation Agencies & Programs A variety of state agencies and programs, in addition to the NY Natural Heritage Program, partner with OPRHP on biodiversity conservation and planning. This appendix also describes a variety of statewide and regional biodiversity conservation efforts that complement OPRHP’s work. NYS BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE The New York State Biodiversity Research Institute is a state-chartered organization based in the New York State Museum who promotes the understanding and conservation of New York’s biological diversity. They administer a broad range of research, education, and information transfer programs, and oversee a competitive grants program for projects that further biodiversity stewardship and research. In 1996, the Biodiversity Research Institute approved funding for the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to undertake an ambitious inventory of its lands for rare species, rare natural communities, and the state’s best examples of common communities. The majority of inventory in state parks occurred over a five-year period, beginning in 1998 and concluding in the spring of 2003. Funding was also approved for a sixth year, which included all newly acquired state parks and several state parks that required additional attention beyond the initial inventory. Telephone: (518) 486-4845 Website: www.nysm.nysed.gov/bri/ NYS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION The Department of Environmental Conservation’s (DEC) biodiversity conservation efforts are handled by a variety of offices with the department. Of particular note for this project are the NY Natural Heritage Program, Endangered Species Unit, and Nongame Unit (all of which are in the Division of Fish, Wildlife, & Marine Resources), and the Division of Lands & Forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Lighthouses of the Western Great Lakes a Web Site Researched and Compiled by Terry Pepper
    A Publication of Friends of Sleeping Bear Dunes © 2011, Friends of Sleeping Bear Dunes, P.O. Box 545, Empire, MI 49630 www.friendsofsleepingbear.org [email protected] Learn more about the Friends of Sleeping Bear Dunes, our mission, projects, and accomplishments on our web site. Support our efforts to keep Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore a wonderful natural and historic place by becoming a member or volunteering for a project that can put your skills to work in the park. This booklet was compiled by Kerry Kelly, Friends of Sleeping Bear Dunes. Much of the content for this booklet was taken from Seeing the Light – Lighthouses of the Western Great Lakes a web site researched and compiled by Terry Pepper www.terrypepper.com. This web site is a great resource if you want information on other lighthouses. Other sources include research reports and photos from the National Park Service. Information about the Lightships that were stationed in the Manitou Passage was obtained from David K. Petersen, author of Erhardt Peters Volume 4 Loving Leland. http://blackcreekpress.com. Extensive background information about many of the residents of the Manitou Islands including a well- researched piece on the William Burton family, credited as the first permanent resident on South Manitou Island is available from www.ManitouiIlandsArchives.org. Click on the Archives link on the left. 2 Lighthouses draw us to them because of their picturesque architecture and their location on beautiful shores of the oceans and Great Lakes. The lives of the keepers and their families fascinate us as we try to imagine ourselves living an isolated existence on a remote shore and maintaining the light with complete dedication.
    [Show full text]
  • Border Security Threatens Northern Border Wildernesses
    Wilderness In Peril: Border Security Measures Threaten Wilderness along the Northern Border with Canada An Analysis Prepared by Wilderness Watch October 2012 Wilderness Watch P.O. Box 9175 Missoula, MT 59807 406-542-2048 www.wildernesswatch.org For more information, contact: George Nickas, Executive Director Kevin Proescholdt, Conservation Director [email protected] [email protected] 406-542-2048 612-201-9266 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary………………………………………………...…………….Page 3 Introduction………………………………………………………..………..….....Page 4 Background…………………………………………………..………………....…Page 4 A. Early 20th Century Border Easements B. International Boundary Treaties with Canada C. 2005 REAL ID Act D. 2006 Interagency Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Border Patrol Practices on the Southern Border and Lessons for the North……………………………………………………………….Page 9 A. Border Wall Construction B. Illegal Roads and Vehicle Routes C. Border Security Infrastructure D. Motorized Patrols Emerging Major Threats to Wildernesses near the Northern Border……...…Page 13 A. Congressional Legislation B. Northern Border Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement C. 2006 MOU and Motorized Patrols D. Administrative Waiver of Federal Laws E. Clearing and Construction in Border Reservations F. Conclusion Needed Actions to Reestablish and Affirm Wilderness Protections Along the Northern Border……………………………………….……………..Page 17 A. Existing Homeland Security Laws B. 2006 MOU C. Northern Border PEIS D. Pending Legislation E. Restore Wilderness Protection Appendix - Wildernesses at Risk along the Northern Border………………....Page 18 3 Executive Summary Under the guise of border security, a plethora of new and proposed laws, policies, memoranda, and other governmental actions pose an unprecedented threat to Wildernesses, including in many national parks, along our nation’s Northern Border. This whitepaper describes the threats and presents several recommendations for securing the protection of Wilderness and parks along the Northern Border.
    [Show full text]