DOCSLIB.ORG

GEOLOGY and TOPOGRAPHY LAKE SUPERIOR LAND DISTRICT, 31St

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

REPORT GENERAL LAND OFFICE, April 26, 1850. ON THE SIR: I have the honor to communicate, herewith, a GEOLOGY AND TOPOGRAPHY report from Messrs. Foster and Whitney, United States OF A PORTION OF THE geologists, on the “copper lands” of the Lake Superior LAKE SUPERIOR LAND DISTRICT, land district, in Michigan, accompanied by a number of IN views of the principal features of that interesting region, THE STATE OF MICHIGAN with diagrams of the mines, &c., illustrating the work. BY There is, also, accompanying this report, a fac-simile of a map of Lake Superior and the adjacent regions, made J. W. FOSTER AND J. D. WHITNEY by the Jesuit missionaries in 1670 and 1671, and UNITED STATES GEOLOGISTS. published at Paris in 1672. This report contains a vast fund of valuable information, IN TWO PARTS. and the publication of it will be an important addition to the cause of science. It would have been communicated PART I. with my usual annual report, but the time since those COPPER LANDS gentlemen were appointed was too short to enable them to prepare it in season. It is now submitted as supplementary to that report, and I respectfully request that it may be so communicated to Congress. WASHINGTON: With much respect, your obedient servant, PRINTED FOR THE HOUSE OF REPS. J. BUTTERFIELD, Commissioner. Hon THOMAS EWING, 1850. Secretary of the Interior. 31st CONGRESS, [HO. OF REPS.] Ex. Doc. 1st Session No. 69 BOSTON, April 15, 1850 GEOLOGICAL REPORT ON THE COPPER LANDS OF LAKE SUPERIOR LAND DISTRICT, MICHIGAN SIR: We herewith present to you a report on the “copper lands” of the Lake Superior land district. When it is considered that this district embraces an area of more LETTER than sixteen thousand square miles; that nearly the FROM whole of that area is an unbroken wilderness; that we THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, were required to explore considerable portions of it with ENCLOSING sufficient minuteness to designate the character of each The geological report on the copper lands of Lake quarter section; and, that, in the accomplishment of this Superior land district, Michigan. object, our camp equipage and provisions, and even our canoes, were carried for long distances on the backs of men; and that the limited state of our supplies often MAY 16, 1850. compelled us to press on without regard to weather— Referred to the Committee on Public Lands, and ordered to be printed. under these circumstances, we trust we shall be pardoned if it be found that we have fallen into minor JUNE 14, 1850. errors, or hastily passed some points which were 10,000 copies extra ordered to be printed. deserving of a more minute examination. In the delineation of the main features of the region, we trust DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, that this report will be found correct. Washington, April 29, 1850. With sincere thanks for the aid afforded us in the SIR: I have the honor to communicate, herewith, a letter prosecution of these researches by several of the from the Commissioner of the General Land Office, officers attached to the bureau over which you preside, transmitting the report of Messrs. Foster and Whitney, we subscribe ourselves, United States geologist, on the copper lands of the Lake Sir, with great respect, your most obedient servants, Superior land district, Michigan. J. W. FOSTER. J. D. WHINEY, I have the honor to be, very respectfully, your obedient United States Geologists. servant, TO HON. JUSTIN BUTTERFIELD, T. EWING, Secretary. Commissioner of the General Land Office. Hon. HOWELL COBB, Speaker of the House of Representatives. 31st Congress, 1st Session. -- Ex. Doc. No. 69. – Page 1 of 49 REPORT but covered with grassy plains, through which herds of ON THE buffalo and deer. GEOLOGY AND TOPOGRAPHY Here dwelt the Sioux or Nadouessi, a race at once OF A PORTION OF THE warlike and indomitable. At that day a feud existed LAKE SUPERIOR LAND DISTRICT, between the two tribes, which has been perpetuated to IN the present time. THE STATE OF MICHIGAN Late in the season Raymbault returned to Peritanguishene with the intention of revisiting the Saut in the succeeding spring, and establishing there a permanent mission; but consumption, brought on by INTRODUCTION. repeated exposures and privations, was fast hurrying Historical sketch.—Raymbault and Jogues’s voyage to him to the grave. The following year he returned with Saut. Ste. Marie.—René Mesnard visits Lake Jogues to Quebec, where he died October 22, 1642. Superior.—Alloüez follows.—Dablon and Marquette Father Jogues started to return, but in ascending the St. follow.—Grand Council.—Marquette proceeds to Green Lawrence was captured by the Mohawks, a predatory Bay.—Discovers the Mississippi.—His death.—Alloüez’s band infesting the shores and tributaries of Lake Erie. death.—Early map of this region.—Effect of the After having been subjected to the most ignominious Missionary labors on the Indians.—Travels of Hennepin; treatment, himself scourged, and his Huron attendants Charlevoix; Henry; Mackenzie.—Expedition of General committed to the flames, he was ultimately ransomed by Cass; of Schoolcraft; of Maj. Long.—Dr. Houghton; his the Dutch in the vicinity of Albany. He revisited France, labors and death.—The treaties by which this district but soon returned to the scene of his labors with a spirit was ceded.—The several acts of government in unabated and a zeal unquenched. reference thereto.—The act authorizing the survey.—Its René Mesnard followed in the track of Raymbault. On organization. the 28th of August, 1660; he left Quebec, taking with him The first steps towards the exploration of the country a scanty stock of necessaries; "for I trust," said he, “in bordering on the great chain of North American lakes that Providence which feeds the little birds of the air, and were taken by the Jesuits of Canada, more than two clothes the wild flowers of the desert." He was past the centuries ago, under the auspices of Count Frontenac, meridian of life, but possessed all the zeal of youth. He then governor general of that region. went forth with the presentiment that he was performing his last journey, for, in writing back to a friend, he On the 7th of September; 1641, Charles Raymbault and remarked: "In three or four months you may add my Isaac Jogues, two missionaries of the order of Jesus— name to the memento of deaths." Having arrived at the an order whoso memorials are to be found in every Saut, he proceeded to coast along the southern shore in quarter of the habitable earth—accompanied by Hurons, a canoe, and on the 15th of October reached the head of left the bay of Pentanguishene in a bark canoe for Saut Keweenaw bay, which he named St. Theresa—the day Ste. Marie. At the head of this bay they had established of his arrival being the anniversary day of patron saint. a mission. It formed, at that time, the western terminus Here he remained until the following spring, when he left, of the travelled route between Montreal and Lake Huron, accompanied by a single Indian, for Chaquamegon bay, by way of the Ottawa river and Lake Simcoe, and for near the head of the lake. They took the route through years afterwards, while the power of France in the Portage lake; and while the voyageur was conveying the Northwest remained in the ascendant; constituted an canoe across the portage, the good Father wandered important link in a chain of posts extending for more than into the woods, and no trace of him was afterwards two thousand miles. obtained. This happened August 20, 1661. The world The route of Raymbault and Jogues lay through the applauds the heroism of Columbus who launched out Georgian bay, thence among the countless islands that upon a trackless ocean in search of a new world. The stud the channel of the St. Mary’s river. After a voyage humble missionary who, committing himself to the of seventeen days they arrived at the falls (Saut,) where guidance of savage attendants, voyaged for days with a they found an Indian village with a population of two boundless waste of waters on one side, and on the other thousand souls. The abundance of white fish, and the an unbroken wilderness, showed a degree of courage facilities for capturing them in the foaming rapids, have and enthusiasm which, has rarely been rivalled, and made this the chosen resort of the Chippewas for which ought to rescue his name from oblivion. centuries. The chiefs received them kindly and invited Claude Alloüez followed in his footsteps. On the 8th of them to dwell in their midst. "We will embrace you as August, 1666, he embarked at Three Rivers, brothers,” they said, “and profit by your words.” accompanied by four hundred Indians, who were on their They here learned of the existence of a lake still beyond, return from Quebec. In the beginning of September he called by the Kitchi-gummi, (Big lake,) surpassing in arrived at the Saut, and entered Lake Superior, "which," magnitude either Huron or Michigan, then called Illinois, said the good missionary, "shall henceforth boar the beyond whose western limits was a destitute of trees, name of M. de Tracy, in token of the obligations the 31st Congress, 1st Session. -- Ex. Doc. No. 69. – Page 2 of 49 people of this region are under to him;" and this is the his ardor, that in two days after his arrival he was on his name applied to it on the earliest map. way back to his forest home. "The savages,” he continues, "respect this lake as a *Charlevoix, in his Travels, has appropriated almost verbatim Alloüez's divinity, and offer sacrifices to it because of its size, for it description.
Recommended publications
  • Great Lakes Islands: Biodiversity Elements And

    Great Lakes Islands: Biodiversity Elements And

    GREAT LAKES ISLANDS: BIODIVERSITY ELEMENTS AND THREATS A FINAL REPORT TO THE GREAT LAKES NATIONAL PROGRAM OFFICE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AUGUST 6, 2007 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Funding for this project has been provided by the Great Lakes Program Office (GLNPO) of the Environmental Protection Agency (Grant No. Gl-96521901: Framework for the Binational Conservation of Great Lakes Islands). We especially appreciated the support of our project officer, K. Rodriquez, and G. Gulezian, director of the GLNPO. Project team members were F. Cuthbert (University of Minnesota), D. Ewert (The Nature Conservancy), R. Greenwood (U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service), D. Kraus (The Nature Conservancy of Canada), M. Seymour (U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service), K. Vigmostad (Principal Investigator, formerly of Northeast-Midwest Institute), and L. Wires (University of Minnesota). Team members for the Ontario portion of the project included W. Bakowsky (NHIC), B. Crins (Ontario Parks), J. Mackenzie (NHIC) and M. McMurtry (NHIC). GIS and technical support for this project has been provided by T. Krahn (Provincial Geomatics Service Centre, OMNR), J. Slatts (The Nature Conservancy), and G. White (The Nature Conservancy of Canada). Many others have provided scientific and policy support for this project. We particularly want to recognize M. DePhillips (The Nature Conservancy), G. Jackson (Parks Canada), B. Manny (Great Lakes Science Center), and C. Vasarhelyi (policy consultant). Cover photograph: A Bay on Gibraltar Island (Lake Erie) ©2005 Karen E. Vigmostad 2 Contents
  • Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions

    Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions

    United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness Visitors and Forest Service Recreation Impacts: Baseline Rocky Mountain Research Station Data Available for Twentieth General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-117 Century Conditions September 2003 David N. Cole Vita Wright Abstract __________________________________________ Cole, David N.; Wright, Vita. 2003. Wilderness visitors and recreation impacts: baseline data available for twentieth century conditions. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-117. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 52 p. This report provides an assessment and compilation of recreation-related monitoring data sources across the National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS). Telephone interviews with managers of all units of the NWPS and a literature search were conducted to locate studies that provide campsite impact data, trail impact data, and information about visitor characteristics. Of the 628 wildernesses that comprised the NWPS in January 2000, 51 percent had baseline campsite data, 9 percent had trail condition data and 24 percent had data on visitor characteristics. Wildernesses managed by the Forest Service and National Park Service were much more likely to have data than wildernesses managed by the Bureau of Land Management and Fish and Wildlife Service. Both unpublished data collected by the management agencies and data published in reports are included. Extensive appendices provide detailed information about available data for every study that we located. These have been organized by wilderness so that it is easy to locate all the information available for each wilderness in the NWPS. Keywords: campsite condition, monitoring, National Wilderness Preservation System, trail condition, visitor characteristics The Authors _______________________________________ David N.
  • Great Lakes Connecting Channels, Widening and Deepening Bends in the St

    Great Lakes Connecting Channels, Widening and Deepening Bends in the St

    FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 GREAT LAKES CONNECTING CHANNELS WIDENING AND DEEPENING BENDS IN THE ST. MARYS RIVER, MICHIGAN (PHASE III) Prepared by U. S. Army Engineer District Detroit, Michigan March 1974 STATEMENT OF FINDINGS GREAT LAKES CONNECTING CHANNELS WIDENING AND DEEPENING BENDS IN ST. MARYS RIVER, MICHIGAN PHASE III SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 1. I have reviewed and evaluated, in light of the overall public interest, the documents concerning the proposed action, as well as the stated views of other interested agencies and the concerned public, relative to the proposed dredging project on the connect­ ing channel waterway of the St. Marys River. 2. The River and Harbor Act of 1956 (P.L. 434, 84th Congress) pro­ vided for a safe vessel draft of 25.5 feet for both upbound and downbound traffic with a least channel width of 300 feet. Authority for inclusion of design and construction of the bend widening projects for the St. Marys River into the existing Great Lakes Channels Authorization was granted by the Chief of Engineers on 12 December 1967, subject: Great Lakes Connecting Channels, Widening and Deepening Bends in the St. Marys and St. Clair Rivers. 3. The continued well-being of tire St. Marys River is a matter of great concern to a wide scope of interests, whether they be commer­ cial, conservational, or recreational. The needs of waterborne commerce in terms of the project were carefully and objectively weighed against the potential impacts on the environment as well as the valid objections of concerned individuals and organizations. All phases of the project have been and continue to be coordinated with the appropriate Federal, State and local agencies having perti­ nent responsibilities.
  • Edwin James's Nineteenth-Century Cross-Cultural Collaborations Kyhl Lyndgaard University of Nevada, Reno

    Edwin James's Nineteenth-Century Cross-Cultural Collaborations Kyhl Lyndgaard University of Nevada, Reno

    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by UNL | Libraries University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Great Plains Quarterly Great Plains Studies, Center for Winter 2010 Landscapes of Removal and Resistance: Edwin James's Nineteenth-Century Cross-Cultural Collaborations Kyhl Lyndgaard University of Nevada, Reno Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly Part of the Indigenous Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Lyndgaard, Kyhl, "Landscapes of Removal and Resistance: Edwin James's Nineteenth-Century Cross-Cultural Collaborations" (2010). Great Plains Quarterly. 2519. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly/2519 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Great Plains Studies, Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Plains Quarterly by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. LANDSCAPES OF REMOVAL AND RESISTANCE EDWIN JAMES'S NINETEENTH,CENTURY CROSS,CULTURAL COLLABORATIONS KYHL LYNDGAARD The life of Edwin James (1797-1861) is book­ One reason for James's obscurity is the willing­ ended by the Lewis and Clark expedition ness he had to collaborate with others. Both (1803-6) and the Civil War (1861-65) (Fig. 1). of his major works, Account of an Expedition James's work engaged key national concerns of from Pittsburgh to the Rocky Mountains (1823) western exploration, natural history, Native and A Narrative of the Captivity and Adventures American relocation, and slavery. His prin­ of John Tanner (1830), as well as many of his cipled stands for preservation of lands and articles, were published with his name listed animals in the Trans-Mississippi West and his as editor or compiler rather than as author.
  • Wiikwedong Dazhi-Ojibwe

    Wiikwedong Dazhi-Ojibwe

    WIIKWEDONG DAZHI-OJIBWE The Keweenaw Bay Ojibwe Waabigwani Giizis – Flower Moon - May 2019 Issue 178 KBIC TRIBAL VETERANS WIIKWEDONG OGICHIDAA SOCIETY Tribal Council Members: HONOR GUARD PROUDLY ACCEPTS THE GIFT OF TWO SCOOTERS Warren C. Swartz, Jr., President Gary F. Loonsfoot, Jr., Vice-President Susan J. LaFernier, Secretary Toni J. Minton, Asst. Secretary Doreen G. Blaker, Treasurer Robert R.D. Curtis, Jr. Dale Goodreau Randall R. Haataja Kim Klopstein Michael F. LaFernier, Sr. Rodney Loonsfoot Elizabeth D. Mayo SPECIAL POINTS OF INTEREST Wiikwedong Ogichidaa Society Veterans gifted scooters KBOCSS visits local schools (Left to right) Proudly displaying the organizations new scooters are KBIC Tribal Veterans Wiikwedong with Easter Bunny Ogichidaa Society Honor Guard Members: Allen Gauthier, Joseph Eckerberg, Rodney Loonsfoot, and Joseph Dowd. Spring Quarterly Council Meet- ing held The KBIC Tribal Veterans Wiikwe- Bringing Easter Joy in our Schools dong Ogichidaa Society Honor Guard KBIC attends NMU Powwow proudly displayed two new scooters KBIC AIS Program Activities they received on Saturday, April 13, 2019. The Veterans’ scooters were KBIC Health Systems Updates made possible through the Wounded Criminal Report Warriors Family Support Network wwfs.org. (Left) Khloe Loonsfoot shares a stroll down Rodney Loonsfoot, Tribal Council/ Baraga Elementary School hall with the Veteran Service Representative, began school’s surprise visitor, Easter Bunny! the process last year through applica- tion. The Tribe had to have an accred- KBIC Office of Child Support Ser- ited service officer who is recognized vices Outreach visited the Baraga by the Veterans Administration. KBIC and L’Anse schools on April 18, met all the eligibility requirements and 2019, along with the Easter Bunny.
  • Border Security Threatens Northern Border Wildernesses

    Border Security Threatens Northern Border Wildernesses

    Wilderness In Peril: Border Security Measures Threaten Wilderness along the Northern Border with Canada An Analysis Prepared by Wilderness Watch October 2012 Wilderness Watch P.O. Box 9175 Missoula, MT 59807 406-542-2048 www.wildernesswatch.org For more information, contact: George Nickas, Executive Director Kevin Proescholdt, Conservation Director [email protected] [email protected] 406-542-2048 612-201-9266 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary………………………………………………...…………….Page 3 Introduction………………………………………………………..………..….....Page 4 Background…………………………………………………..………………....…Page 4 A. Early 20th Century Border Easements B. International Boundary Treaties with Canada C. 2005 REAL ID Act D. 2006 Interagency Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Border Patrol Practices on the Southern Border and Lessons for the North……………………………………………………………….Page 9 A. Border Wall Construction B. Illegal Roads and Vehicle Routes C. Border Security Infrastructure D. Motorized Patrols Emerging Major Threats to Wildernesses near the Northern Border……...…Page 13 A. Congressional Legislation B. Northern Border Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement C. 2006 MOU and Motorized Patrols D. Administrative Waiver of Federal Laws E. Clearing and Construction in Border Reservations F. Conclusion Needed Actions to Reestablish and Affirm Wilderness Protections Along the Northern Border……………………………………….……………..Page 17 A. Existing Homeland Security Laws B. 2006 MOU C. Northern Border PEIS D. Pending Legislation E. Restore Wilderness Protection Appendix - Wildernesses at Risk along the Northern Border………………....Page 18 3 Executive Summary Under the guise of border security, a plethora of new and proposed laws, policies, memoranda, and other governmental actions pose an unprecedented threat to Wildernesses, including in many national parks, along our nation’s Northern Border. This whitepaper describes the threats and presents several recommendations for securing the protection of Wilderness and parks along the Northern Border.
  • MS-042 John T. Reeder Photograph Collection

    MS-042 John T. Reeder Photograph Collection

    John T. Reeder Photograph Collection MS-042 Finding aid prepared by Elizabeth Russell, revised by Rachael Bussert. This finding aid was produced using the Archivists' Toolkit June 26, 2014 Describing Archives: A Content Standard Michigan Technological University Archives and Copper Country Historical Collections 1400 Townsend Drive Houghton, Michigan, 49931 906-487-2505 [email protected] John T. Reeder Photograph Collection MS-042 Table of Contents Summary Information ................................................................................................................................. 4 Biography.......................................................................................................................................................5 Collection Scope and Content Summary...................................................................................................... 5 Arrangement...................................................................................................................................................5 Administrative Information .........................................................................................................................6 Controlled Access Headings..........................................................................................................................6 Collection Inventory...................................................................................................................................... 8 Series I, Inventories and General Records..............................................................................................8
  • Falco Peregrinus Tunstall Peregrineperegrine Falcon,Falcon Page 1

    Falco Peregrinus Tunstall Peregrineperegrine Falcon,Falcon Page 1

    Falco peregrinus Tunstall peregrineperegrine falcon,falcon Page 1 State Distribution Best Survey Period Copyright: Rick Baetsen Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Status: State Endangered Dakota, Florida, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas, and Nevada. In Mexico, Global and state rank: G4/S1 peregrine falcon is present on the Baja Peninsula, islands of the Gulf of California, and northwestern Family: Falconidae – Falcons states of the mainland. Breeding also confirmed for eastern Cuba and the Dominican Republic (White et al. Total range: While having one of the most extensive 2002). global distributions, peregrine falcons were never abundant anywhere, due to its specific habitat State distribution: Barrows (1912) noted that the requirements and position in the food web as a top peregrine falcon was “nowhere common” and Wood predator (Hess 1991). The species was formerly (1951) called the species a rare local summer resident extirpated throughout much of its original range due to in northern counties along the Great Lakes. Isaacs exposure to organic chemicals such as DDT, and (1976) described ten historical nesting sites in Michigan: reoccupancy and restoration is still incomplete (White et Goose Lake escarpments, Huron Islands, Huron al. 2002). Three subspecies occur in North America, Mountains, and Lake Michigamme in Marquette with F. p. anatum being the subspecies that breeds in County; Grand Island and Pictured Rocks in Alger Michigan. Payne (1983) noted that F. p. tundrius is an County; Garden Peninsula of Delta County; Isle Royale occasional transient in the State. See White et al. in Keweenaw County; Mackinac Island in Mackinac (2002) and citations therein for a detailed description of County; and South Fox Island in Leelanau County.
  • C H Ippewa Coun T Y H I S T O Rical Soc Ie

    C H Ippewa Coun T Y H I S T O Rical Soc Ie

    2018 July NewsA_Layout 1 7/19/18 9:27 PM Page 1 WA C PE OU CCHS Newsletter Number 92 IP N July 2018 T H Y C H Y I S T T E O I R C ICA L S O CCHS • 115 Ashmun Street • P. O . Box 342 • Sault Ste. Marie, MI 49783 906-69306-635-7085-702 • 82 h i s•t oFax:ry@ 906cchs-63mi.5-9com280 • •w [email protected] Rendezvous in the Sault 2018 By Angie Patterson The 2018 Rendezvous in the Sault is scheduled for Saturday, July 28 (10 a.m.– 6 p.m.) and Sunday, July 29 (10 a.m.– 4 p.m.). In addition to the historical encampment on the grounds of City Hall, the Historic Water Street Homes will be open to the public with activities for the whole family along with tours of the facilities. Opening Ceremonies will take place at Brady Park on Saturday at 11 a.m. Visitors from the Sault’s sister city, Ryuo-Cho, Japan, have scheduled time to visit the event and attend the opening ceremonies that will be held under the supervision of the Belletre French Marines. This is the sixth year for Rendezvous in the Sault in its present form. The event is supported by the Sault Convention and Visitors Bureau, the City’s Osborn Trust Fund, and through ticket and food sales. The event is staffed by volunteers from the Chippewa County Historical Society and the general community. Reenactors come from around Michigan and surrounding states to set up camps and provide demonstrations of life e p in u o r T colonial e c n a times in D l a c the Great i s u M Lakes e i n g region.
  • Lighthouses – Clippings

    Lighthouses – Clippings

    GREAT LAKES MARINE COLLECTION MILWAUKEE PUBLIC LIBRARY/WISCONSIN MARINE HISTORICAL SOCIETY MARINE SUBJECT FILES LIGHTHOUSE CLIPPINGS Current as of November 7, 2018 LIGHTHOUSE NAME – STATE - LAKE – FILE LOCATION Algoma Pierhead Light – Wisconsin – Lake Michigan - Algoma Alpena Light – Michigan – Lake Huron - Alpena Apostle Islands Lights – Wisconsin – Lake Superior - Apostle Islands Ashland Harbor Breakwater Light – Wisconsin – Lake Superior - Ashland Ashtabula Harbor Light – Ohio – Lake Erie - Ashtabula Badgeley Island – Ontario – Georgian Bay, Lake Huron – Badgeley Island Bailey’s Harbor Light – Wisconsin – Lake Michigan – Bailey’s Harbor, Door County Bailey’s Harbor Range Lights – Wisconsin – Lake Michigan – Bailey’s Harbor, Door County Bala Light – Ontario – Lake Muskoka – Muskoka Lakes Bar Point Shoal Light – Michigan – Lake Erie – Detroit River Baraga (Escanaba) (Sand Point) Light – Michigan – Lake Michigan – Sand Point Barber’s Point Light (Old) – New York – Lake Champlain – Barber’s Point Barcelona Light – New York – Lake Erie – Barcelona Lighthouse Battle Island Lightstation – Ontario – Lake Superior – Battle Island Light Beaver Head Light – Michigan – Lake Michigan – Beaver Island Beaver Island Harbor Light – Michigan – Lake Michigan – St. James (Beaver Island Harbor) Belle Isle Lighthouse – Michigan – Lake St. Clair – Belle Isle Bellevue Park Old Range Light – Michigan/Ontario – St. Mary’s River – Bellevue Park Bete Grise Light – Michigan – Lake Superior – Mendota (Bete Grise) Bete Grise Bay Light – Michigan – Lake Superior
  • Biodiversity of Michigan's Great Lakes Islands

    Biodiversity of Michigan's Great Lakes Islands

    FILE COPY DO NOT REMOVE Biodiversity of Michigan’s Great Lakes Islands Knowledge, Threats and Protection Judith D. Soule Conservation Research Biologist April 5, 1993 Report for: Land and Water Management Division (CZM Contract 14C-309-3) Prepared by: Michigan Natural Features Inventory Stevens T. Mason Building P.O. Box 30028 Lansing, MI 48909 (517) 3734552 1993-10 F A report of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. 309-3 BIODWERSITY OF MICHIGAN’S GREAT LAKES ISLANDS Knowledge, Threats and Protection by Judith D. Soule Conservation Research Biologist Prepared by Michigan Natural Features Inventory Fifth floor, Mason Building P.O. Box 30023 Lansing, Michigan 48909 April 5, 1993 for Michigan Department of Natural Resources Land and Water Management Division Coastal Zone Management Program Contract # 14C-309-3 CL] = CD C] t2 CL] C] CL] CD = C = CZJ C] C] C] C] C] C] .TABLE Of CONThNTS TABLE OF CONTENTS I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iii INTRODUCTION 1 HISTORY AND PHYSICAL RESOURCES 4 Geology and post-glacial history 4 Size, isolation, and climate 6 Human history 7 BIODWERSITY OF THE ISLANDS 8 Rare animals 8 Waterfowl values 8 Other birds and fish 9 Unique plants 10 Shoreline natural communities 10 Threatened, endangered, and exemplary natural features 10 OVERVIEW OF RESEARCH ON MICHIGAN’S GREAT LAKES ISLANDS 13 Island research values 13 Examples of biological research on islands 13 Moose 13 Wolves 14 Deer 14 Colonial nesting waterbirds 14 Island biogeography studies 15 Predator-prey
  • LAND by the LAKES Nearshore Terrestrial Ecosystems

    LAND by the LAKES Nearshore Terrestrial Ecosystems

    State of the Lakes Ecosystem Conference 1996 Background Paper THE LAND BY THE LAKES Nearshore Terrestrial Ecosystems Ron Reid Bobolink Enterprises Washago, Ontario Canada Karen Holland U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chicago, Illinois U.S.A. October 1997 ISBN 0-662-26033-3 EPA 905-R-97-015c Cat. No. En40-11/35-3-1997E ii The Land by the Lakes—SOLEC 96 Table of Contents Acknowledgments ................................................................. v 1. Overview of the Land by the Lakes .................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................ 1 1.2 Report Structure ......................................................... 2 1.3 Conclusion ............................................................. 2 1.4 Key Observations ........................................................ 3 1.5 Moving Forward ......................................................... 5 2. The Ecoregional Context .......................................................... 6 2.1 Why Consider Ecoregional Context? .......................................... 6 2.2 Classification Systems for Great Lakes Ecoregions ............................... 7 3. Where Land and Water Meet ....................................................... 9 3.1 Changing Shapes and Structures ............................................. 9 3.1.1 Crustal Tilting ................................................. 10 3.1.2 Climate ....................................................... 10 3.1.3 Erosion ......................................................