DOCSLIB.ORG

Sault Ste. Marie Case Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sault Ste. Marie Case Study THE CITY OF A CASE STUDY {SAULT STE. MARIE Michigan Coastal Community Working Waterfronts A CASE STUDY THE CITY OF SAULT STE. MARIE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Michigan Coastal Community FELLOWSHIP MENTORS Working Waterfronts Mark Breederland, Michigan Sea Grant Extension Emily Finnell, Office of the Great Lakes NOAA FELLOWSHIP ADVISORY COMMITTEE This case study was compiled as part of a set of 11 working Jon Allan Richard Norton John Warbach waterfront case studies in coastal communities. For more Dave Knight Chuck Pistis Ronda Wuycheck information on the series, please see the Introduction, Carol Linteau Jennifer Read Lynelle Marolf Frank Ruswick Context and Trends, Waterfront Land Use, Best Practices and Recommendations and Next Steps sections. OFFICE OF THE GREAT LAKES AND SEA GRANT STAFF OTHER CASE STUDIES IN THIS SERIES: PREPARED BY Alpena Marquette Port Huron Elizabeth Durfee Charlevoix Monroe Saugatuck 2011-2013 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Coastal Manistee Muskegon Zone Management Fellowship with the Michigan Coastal Zone Manistique Ontonagon Management Program and Michigan Sea Grant. Cover photos: Bayliss Public Library, Elizabeth Durfee, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. June 2013 | MICHU-13-724 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ..............................................................4 FIGURES AND TABLES Summary .................................................................5 State of Michigan and Chippewa County and aerial image of the city of Sault Ste. Marie Context ...................................................................7 with the St. Marys River........................................... 6 Community Profile ................................................... 8 Table 1. Intent, permitted uses and special Community Overview .............................................. 9 uses of zoning districts that accommodate water-dependent uses and/or public access ......... 13 Waterfront History .................................................. 10 Figure 2. City of Sault Ste. Marie 2007 Waterfront Summary ............................................. 11 zoning districts .......................................................14 Zoning....................................................................13 Figure 3. Map of zoning adjacent to waterfront and frontage by zoning category ........................... 15 Parcel Classification .............................................. 17 Figure 4. Map of zoning and location of Working Waterfront SWOT Analysis ..................... 19 water-dependent uses within a 1000-foot buffer Tools, Strategies and Best Practices for of water bodies and waterfront land area Maintaining Working Waterfronts........................... 20 by zoning category ................................................ 16 Guiding Principles.................................................. 21 Figure 5. Inventory of Identified water-dependent uses within a 1000-foot buffer of the References and Resources ................................... 22 St. Marys River ......................................................17 Figure 6. Water-dependent and enhanced uses, docks, waterfront parks along the waterfront and within 1000 feet of bodies of water ................. 18 Table 2. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats related to maintaining Sault Ste. Marie’s working waterfront ................................................. 19 Michigan Sea Grant INTRODUCTION Many coastal communities have areas known fish stocks and regulations, aging and inadequate This case study: as working waterfronts — waterfront lands, infrastructure, decline in waterfront industry and n Characterizes one of many working waterfronts waterfront infrastructure and waterways that are economic recession — threaten the viability of found throughout Michigan’s diverse coastal used for water-dependent uses and activities. water-dependent businesses and access to the communities. These uses may include ports, small recreational public trust waters. Left unchecked, these threats n Identifies existing waterfront amenities, waterfront boat and fishing docks and other types of places can result in the slow loss of working waterfronts history, waterfront zoning and land area occupied or businesses where people use and access the and permanent conversion of waterfront property by water-related uses. water. Coastal communities’ working waterfronts to non-water-dependent uses. n offer economic and cultural value, contribute to a Highlights examples of waterfront challenges, community’s identity and are intrinsically tied to Active waterfront planning and the sharing and threats and opportunities as well as tools and a region’s natural resources. implementation of tools, resources and strategies strategies for maintaining the working waterfront. for maintaining and protecting working waterfronts A number of factors — such as population can ensure access for water-dependent uses and change, competing land uses and development activities, as well as preserve options for future pressure, fluctuations in water levels, changes in waterfront uses. SAULT STE. MARIE Michigan Coastal Community Working Waterfronts Case Study 4 SUMMARY Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan was iron ore, coal, limestone, petroleum, 34 percent other uses, including the Best practices for maintaining access founded in 1668 and incorporated as a chemicals, primary manufactured tourist district, 15 percent industrial to the waterfront for the public and city in 1887. It is the oldest community goods, food and farm products, and and 6 percent commercial uses. The water-dependent uses in Sault Ste. in Michigan and the first non-Indian manufactured equipment, machinery Tourist District permits water-related Marie include: settlement in the Midwest. and machine products pass through uses, among other uses. n the channel annually. This generates Placemaking and improving public Sault Ste. Marie is located in the $3.9 billion in direct revenue and more Both of the city’s commercial docks waterfront space. northeast Upper Peninsula along the than 16,500 jobs annually. are underutilized. Sault Ste. Marie’s n Capitalizing on tourism with ample St. Marys River on the U.S.-Canadian west dock, or Reiss Dock, is the only amenities and a well-connected International Boarder. The city has Sault Ste. Marie has two ports that are deep water dock in the region and downtown waterfront. approximately 33 miles of frontage on also Harbors of Refuge, the Charles has the capacity to accommodate a the St. Marys River, which drains Lake T. Harvey Marina and the George fully loaded 1000-footer. The dock is Superior to Lake Huron. Kemp Marina. The city has a number ideally located at the convergence of of waterfront parks that provide deep water, a major rail yard and an The Soo Locks, which are the largest additional access to the upper and interstate freeway. The port has been waterway traffic system in the world, lower river. Approximately 500,000 inactive for 60 years and the city is were constructed in Sault Ste. Marie people visit the Soo Locks visitor’s exploring options to off-load materials to enable expansion of commerce and center and park every year. at the Reiss Dock instead of the trade opportunities in 1852. Today, downtown Carbide Dock. the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Although much of the waterfront (USACE) Soo Area Office operates industry has moved inland, the Located on the east side of the city, and maintains four navigational locks, waterfront has retained much of its the Carbide Dock is used occasionally channels and structures and some of historical character. The downtown for salt deliveries but is not used to its the community’s waterfront property. core of the city is separated by a full capacity. There is potential for this power canal constructed in 1902. property to be redeveloped for public The 63-mile long St. Marys River use in the future. connecting channel flows between Tourism dominates the economy and Michigan and Ontario, Canada from much of the waterfront land use in Additional challenges associated Lake Superior to Lake Huron. The Sault Ste. Marie’s downtown is tourist- with managing the city’s working St. Marys River federally authorized oriented. Land use along the St. waterfront include budget cuts, which project includes channel maintenance, Marys River consists of approximately have resulted in low prioritization construction and operation of four 73 percent tourist, 16 percent for waterfront planning, an outdated locks and two canals, a hydropower residential, 11 percent industrial and master plan and integration of plant and anchorage areas in the 1 percent commercial uses. Land use planning across local and federal river. Over 80 million tons of cargo, within a 1000-foot buffer of the river jurisdictions. including bulk commodities such as consists of 45 percent residential, SAULT STE. MARIE Michigan Coastal Community Working Waterfronts Case Study 5 SAULT STE. MARIE, MI St. Marys River Michigan 100 miles N Chippewa County City of Sault Ste Marie 2 mile N SAULT STE. MARIE Michigan Coastal Community Working Waterfronts Case Study 6 CONTEXT Jurisdiction / Government City Region Upper Peninsula County Chippewa Land Area 9,455 acres / 14.8 square miles Watershed / Subwatershed St. Mary’s River / Sault Area Watershed Dominant Land Use of Subwatershed Urban (60%) Adjacent Bodies of Water St. Mary’s River Types of Water Body Connecting Channel between Lakes Superior and Huron Percent of Land Area within the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In This Issue …
    In This Issue … INLAND SEAS®VOLUME 72 WINTER 2016 NUMBER 4 MAUMEE VALLEY COMES HOME . 290 by Christopher H. Gillcrist KEEPING IT IN TRIM: BALLAST AND GREAT LAKES SHIPPING . 292 by Matthew Daley, Grand Valley State University Jeffrey L. Ram, Wayne State University RUNNING OUT OF STEAM, NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS FROM THE SS HERBERT C. JACKSON . 319 by Patrick D. Lapinski NATIONAL RECREATION AREAS AND THE CREATION OF PICTURED ROCKS NATIONAL LAKESHORE . 344 by Kathy S. Mason BOOKS . 354 GREAT LAKES NEWS . 356 by Greg Rudnick MUSEUM COLUMN . 374 by Carrie Sowden 289 KEEPING IT IN TRIM: BALLAST AND GREAT LAKES SHIPPING by Matthew Daley, Grand Valley State University Jeffrey L. Ram, Wayne State University n the morning of July 24, 1915, hundreds of employees of the West- Oern Electric Company and their families boarded the passenger steamship Eastland for a day trip to Michigan City, Indiana. Built in 1903, this twin screw, steel hulled steamship was considered a fast boat on her regular run. Yet throughout her service life, her design revealed a series of problems with stability. Additionally, changes such as more lifeboats in the aftermath of the Titanic disaster, repositioning of engines, and alterations to her upper cabins, made these built-in issues far worse. These failings would come to a disastrous head at the dock on the Chicago River. With over 2,500 passengers aboard, the ship heeled back and forth as the chief engineer struggled to control the ship’s stability and failed. At 7:30 a.m., the Eastland heeled to port, coming to rest on the river bottom, trapping pas- sengers inside the hull and throwing many more into the river.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Lakes Connecting Channels, Widening and Deepening Bends in the St
    FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 GREAT LAKES CONNECTING CHANNELS WIDENING AND DEEPENING BENDS IN THE ST. MARYS RIVER, MICHIGAN (PHASE III) Prepared by U. S. Army Engineer District Detroit, Michigan March 1974 STATEMENT OF FINDINGS GREAT LAKES CONNECTING CHANNELS WIDENING AND DEEPENING BENDS IN ST. MARYS RIVER, MICHIGAN PHASE III SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 1. I have reviewed and evaluated, in light of the overall public interest, the documents concerning the proposed action, as well as the stated views of other interested agencies and the concerned public, relative to the proposed dredging project on the connect­ ing channel waterway of the St. Marys River. 2. The River and Harbor Act of 1956 (P.L. 434, 84th Congress) pro­ vided for a safe vessel draft of 25.5 feet for both upbound and downbound traffic with a least channel width of 300 feet. Authority for inclusion of design and construction of the bend widening projects for the St. Marys River into the existing Great Lakes Channels Authorization was granted by the Chief of Engineers on 12 December 1967, subject: Great Lakes Connecting Channels, Widening and Deepening Bends in the St. Marys and St. Clair Rivers. 3. The continued well-being of tire St. Marys River is a matter of great concern to a wide scope of interests, whether they be commer­ cial, conservational, or recreational. The needs of waterborne commerce in terms of the project were carefully and objectively weighed against the potential impacts on the environment as well as the valid objections of concerned individuals and organizations. All phases of the project have been and continue to be coordinated with the appropriate Federal, State and local agencies having perti­ nent responsibilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Edwin James's Nineteenth-Century Cross-Cultural Collaborations Kyhl Lyndgaard University of Nevada, Reno
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by UNL | Libraries University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Great Plains Quarterly Great Plains Studies, Center for Winter 2010 Landscapes of Removal and Resistance: Edwin James's Nineteenth-Century Cross-Cultural Collaborations Kyhl Lyndgaard University of Nevada, Reno Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly Part of the Indigenous Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Lyndgaard, Kyhl, "Landscapes of Removal and Resistance: Edwin James's Nineteenth-Century Cross-Cultural Collaborations" (2010). Great Plains Quarterly. 2519. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly/2519 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Great Plains Studies, Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Plains Quarterly by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. LANDSCAPES OF REMOVAL AND RESISTANCE EDWIN JAMES'S NINETEENTH,CENTURY CROSS,CULTURAL COLLABORATIONS KYHL LYNDGAARD The life of Edwin James (1797-1861) is book­ One reason for James's obscurity is the willing­ ended by the Lewis and Clark expedition ness he had to collaborate with others. Both (1803-6) and the Civil War (1861-65) (Fig. 1). of his major works, Account of an Expedition James's work engaged key national concerns of from Pittsburgh to the Rocky Mountains (1823) western exploration, natural history, Native and A Narrative of the Captivity and Adventures American relocation, and slavery. His prin­ of John Tanner (1830), as well as many of his cipled stands for preservation of lands and articles, were published with his name listed animals in the Trans-Mississippi West and his as editor or compiler rather than as author.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Marys Falls Canal HAER No. MI-322-D-3 (Soo Locks, Military Defense Subcomplex, Building #3/Dayroom & PX) St
    St. Marys Falls Canal HAER No. MI-322-D-3 (Soo Locks, Military Defense Subcomplex, Building #3/Dayroom & PX) St. Marys River at the Falls Sault Ste. Marie Chippewa County Michigan PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA Historic American Engineering Record National Park Service Midwest Regional Office 1709 Jackson Street Omaha, Nebraska 68102 HAER No. MI-322-D-3 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD ST.MARYS FALLS CANAL (SOO LOCKS, MILITARY DEFENSE SUBCOMPLEX, BUILDING #3/DAYROOM & PX) Location: St. Marys River at the Falls Sault Ste. Marie, Chippewa County, Michigan Significance: Building #3 of the Military Defense subcomplex is significant as an element that contributes to the overall integrity ofthe Soo Lock complex. This facility also demonstrates the strategic importance of the Soo Locks and their ability to facilitate shipping along the St. Marys River, between the steel mills of the lower Great Lakes and the ore fields in the Lake Superior region. History: Building #3/Dayroom and PX was built in the mid-l 950s as part of the effort to protect the Soo Locks from attack during the Cold War. Description: A. General Statement: 1. Architectural character: This is a simple, one-story, building with a shallow gabled roof. 2. Condition of fabric: The integrity of the building is poor. It is partially open to the weather, generally abandoned and deteriorating. B. Exterior Description: 1. General description: Constructed to permit rapid set-up and take-down, this rectangular structure is framed with metal wall studs and rafters that are hinged and pinned. The building is also sheathed and roofed with metal panels.
    [Show full text]
  • C H Ippewa Coun T Y H I S T O Rical Soc Ie
    2018 July NewsA_Layout 1 7/19/18 9:27 PM Page 1 WA C PE OU CCHS Newsletter Number 92 IP N July 2018 T H Y C H Y I S T T E O I R C ICA L S O CCHS • 115 Ashmun Street • P. O . Box 342 • Sault Ste. Marie, MI 49783 906-69306-635-7085-702 • 82 h i s•t oFax:ry@ 906cchs-63mi.5-9com280 • •w [email protected] Rendezvous in the Sault 2018 By Angie Patterson The 2018 Rendezvous in the Sault is scheduled for Saturday, July 28 (10 a.m.– 6 p.m.) and Sunday, July 29 (10 a.m.– 4 p.m.). In addition to the historical encampment on the grounds of City Hall, the Historic Water Street Homes will be open to the public with activities for the whole family along with tours of the facilities. Opening Ceremonies will take place at Brady Park on Saturday at 11 a.m. Visitors from the Sault’s sister city, Ryuo-Cho, Japan, have scheduled time to visit the event and attend the opening ceremonies that will be held under the supervision of the Belletre French Marines. This is the sixth year for Rendezvous in the Sault in its present form. The event is supported by the Sault Convention and Visitors Bureau, the City’s Osborn Trust Fund, and through ticket and food sales. The event is staffed by volunteers from the Chippewa County Historical Society and the general community. Reenactors come from around Michigan and surrounding states to set up camps and provide demonstrations of life e p in u o r T colonial e c n a times in D l a c the Great i s u M Lakes e i n g region.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGY and TOPOGRAPHY LAKE SUPERIOR LAND DISTRICT, 31St
    REPORT GENERAL LAND OFFICE, April 26, 1850. ON THE SIR: I have the honor to communicate, herewith, a GEOLOGY AND TOPOGRAPHY report from Messrs. Foster and Whitney, United States OF A PORTION OF THE geologists, on the “copper lands” of the Lake Superior LAKE SUPERIOR LAND DISTRICT, land district, in Michigan, accompanied by a number of IN views of the principal features of that interesting region, THE STATE OF MICHIGAN with diagrams of the mines, &c., illustrating the work. BY There is, also, accompanying this report, a fac-simile of a map of Lake Superior and the adjacent regions, made J. W. FOSTER AND J. D. WHITNEY by the Jesuit missionaries in 1670 and 1671, and UNITED STATES GEOLOGISTS. published at Paris in 1672. This report contains a vast fund of valuable information, IN TWO PARTS. and the publication of it will be an important addition to the cause of science. It would have been communicated PART I. with my usual annual report, but the time since those COPPER LANDS gentlemen were appointed was too short to enable them to prepare it in season. It is now submitted as supplementary to that report, and I respectfully request that it may be so communicated to Congress. WASHINGTON: With much respect, your obedient servant, PRINTED FOR THE HOUSE OF REPS. J. BUTTERFIELD, Commissioner. Hon THOMAS EWING, 1850. Secretary of the Interior. 31st CONGRESS, [HO. OF REPS.] Ex. Doc. 1st Session No. 69 BOSTON, April 15, 1850 GEOLOGICAL REPORT ON THE COPPER LANDS OF LAKE SUPERIOR LAND DISTRICT, MICHIGAN SIR: We herewith present to you a report on the “copper lands” of the Lake Superior land district.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Superior Trail
    Boatloads of Fun Sault Ste. Marie, Brimley, & Les Cheneaux Soo Locks, Point Iroquois Light House, Les Cheneaux Islands Day 1— 9am Breakfast 10am Tour the Soo Locks by Boat Explore the largest waterway traffic system on earth. You’ll depart from Dock 1, located at 1157 E. Portage Avenue. (Reservations can be made by calling 1-800-432-6301. Tours travel along the international shoreline, while passengers delight in the sights, sounds and excitement of Michigan’s oldest city—Sault Ste. Marie. Boats are climate-controlled and equipped with restrooms and a snack bar. Tours last approximately two hours. 12:30pmLunch at one of the many downtown restaurants. Check out the dining page on SaultSteMarie.com. 1:30pm Travel over to Brimley (25 minutes). 2pm Overlook scenic Whitefish Bay. The Hiawatha National Forest’s Point Iroquois Lighthouse was established over 150 years ago. Its 65-foot brick structure offers views of Canada across the bay. Take a tour of this lighthouse or take a stroll on one of the boardwalks leading to surrounding woodlands. The waterfront offers view of passing ships on Lake Superior. 5pm Head back to Sault Ste. Marie (25 minutes). Boatloads of Fun Itinerary www.thegreatwaters.com 6pm Dinner in Sault Ste. Marie. Day 2 – 9am Breakfast 10am Travel to Cedarville along M-129 (45 minutes). 11am Walk the harbor of the waterfront business districts. 1:30pm Lunch in the Les Cheneaux. Check out the restaurant section of lescheneaux.org for options. 2pm Check out vintage boating exhibits. The Les Cheneaux Maritime Museum (located four blocks east of the M-129 and M-134 intersection in Cedarville) displays vintage boats, marine artifacts, antique outboard motors, and historic photos of area boating.
    [Show full text]
  • GREAT LAKES CRUISE 8 Days on Victory I from Toronto to Chicago August 27, 2020 - 13 Days
    GREAT LAKES CRUISE 8 days on Victory I from Toronto to Chicago August 27, 2020 - 13 Days Fares Per Person: based on double/twin $9,950 Category E $10,615 Category C $12,745 Category AA > Please add 0.3% GST. > Single fares and other categories also available. Early Bookers: $220 discount on first 10 seats; $110 on next 6 > Experience Points: Earn 110 points from this tour. Redeem 110 points if you book by April 23. Includes • Transportation from Kamloops, Salmon Arm and • Ojibwe Cultural Foundation Okanagan cities to/from Kelowna Airport • Lake freighter SS Valley Camp Museum • WestJet flight from Kelowna to Toronto • Insider's look at the Soo Locks • Current air transport taxes and fees • Horse-drawn carriage tour of Mackinac Island • One piece of checked luggage on WestJet • Fort Mackinac • 3 nights of hotel accommodation & taxes • Visit to Grand Hotel with lunch buffet • Transfer from Toronto airport to hotel and to ship • Transportation for 2 days in Chicago • 9 days and 8 nights on board Victory I • Locally-guided tour of Chicago • Cruise gratuities • 360 Chicago Observatory • Port charges, cruise taxes and lock fees • Chicago Architecture Cruise • Locally-guided tour to Niagara Falls • Tommy Gun’s Garage dinner theatre • Hornblower cruise to bottom of Niagara Falls • Gratuities for local guides and drivers • Cleveland Museum of Art • Transfer from hotel to Chicago airport • Rock and Roll Hall of Fame • Alaska Airlines flight from Chicago to Kelowna • Detroit Institute of Arts • Knowledgeable Wells Gray tour director • Motown Museum • Luggage handling at hotels and ship • West Canfield Historic District • 29 meals: 10 breakfasts, 8 lunches, 11 dinners MV Victory I The ship was built in 2001 in Florida and named Cape May Light.
    [Show full text]
  • Shipwreck Surveys of the 2018 Field Season
    Storms and Strandings, Collisions and Cold: Shipwreck Surveys of the 2018 Field Season Included: Thomas Friant, Selah Chamberlain, Montgomery, Grace Patterson, Advance, I.A. Johnson State Archaeology and Maritime Preservation Technical Report Series #19-001 Tamara L. Thomsen, Caitlin N. Zant and Victoria L. Kiefer Assisted by grant funding from the University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute and Wisconsin Coastal Management Program, and a charitable donation from Elizabeth Uihlein of the Uline Corporation, this report was prepared by the Wisconsin Historical Society’s Maritime Preservation and Archaeology Program. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute, the National Sea Grant College Program, the Wisconsin Coastal Management Program, or the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Association. Note: At the time of publication, Thomas Friant and Montgomery sites are pending listing on the State and National Registers of Historic Places. Nomination packets for these shipwreck sites have been prepared and submitted to the Wisconsin State Historic Preservation Office. I.A. Johnson and Advance sites are listed on the State Register of Historic Places pending listing on the National Register of Historic Places, and Selah Chamberlain site is listed on the State and National Register of Historic Places. Grace Patterson site has been determined not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Cover photo: A diver surveying the scow schooner I.A. Johnson, Sheboygan County, Wisconsin. Copyright © 2019 by Wisconsin Historical Society All rights reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS ILLUSTRATIONS AND IMAGES ............................................................................................. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 106Th CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 106th CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 146 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 31, 2000 No. 141 House of Representatives The House met at 6 p.m. and was God of all grace, You have called us Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Jour- called to order by the Speaker pro tem- to eternal glory. Help us to be ever nal stands approved. pore (Mr. BARR of Georgia). mindful of our final destiny and our Mr. MCNULTY. Mr. Speaker, pursu- f purpose while here on Earth. ant to clause 1, rule I, I demand a vote You not only call each of us by name, on agreeing to the Speaker pro DESIGNATION OF THE SPEAKER You draw us to Yourself by our innate tempore's approval of the Journal. PRO TEMPORE desire to know the truth, to seek what The SPEAKER pro tempore. The The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- is good, to take delight in beauty and question is on the Chair's approval of fore the House the following commu- to hunger for lasting justice. the Journal. Complete Your work in us and nication from the Speaker: The question was taken; and the through us that we may prove our- WASHINGTON, DC, Speaker pro tempore announced that selves public servants and bring this the ayes appeared to have it. October 31, 2000. Nation to Your honor and give You I hereby appoint the Honorable BOB BARR Mr. MCNULTY. Mr. Speaker, I object to act as Speaker pro tempore on this day.
    [Show full text]
  • JANUARY • FEBRUARY, 2001 Volume XLIX; Number 1
    elescope JANUARY • FEBRUARY, 2001 Volume XLIX; Number 1 iH srnvfl*; MEMBERSHIP NOTES • It is with deep regret that we announce the death of Life Member Gordon P. Bugbee on October 29, 2000. Gordon served on the Board of Director's until 1983. He had been teaching architecture full-time at Lawrence Tech since 1978, and class schedules conflicted with Board meetings. Gordon left the Board, but still remained active in supplying articles to Telescope. To sum up the early contributions that Gordon made to the Institute was best expressed by Robert Radunz in 1966 when Gordon was stepping down as Editor of Telescope. "The name GORDON P. BUGBEE appeared in Telescope for the first time in the July, 1953 issue. In fact it appears twice. First in a list of new members. Then it appears in a story about the model exhibition to be held in August, 1953. Gordon was one of the members who could be contacted for tickets. Since then, the name GORDON P. BUGBEE has appeared in the pages of Telescope hundreds of times. He has been one of our most loyal workers. His articles about Great Lakes shipping would make a volume in themselves. In fact, a group of articles he wrote about the D & C Line were published in a separate booklet by the Institute. During the period he has been editor of the Telescope, we have seen it grow to one of the outstanding marine publications in the country. Telescope and the Institute have received national recognition that was due in no small part of the work of GORDON BUGBEE." Gordon Bugbee served as Telescope editor from 1962 to 1966, when he moved to Kalamazoo and found it difficult to make regular trips back to the museum to research future Telescope issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I - Updated Estimate Of
    Part I - Updated Estimate of Fair Market Value of the S.S. Keewatin in September 2018 05 October 2018 Part I INDEX PART I S.S. KEEWATIN – ESTIMATE OF FAIR MARKET VALUE SEPTEMBER 2018 SCHEDULE A – UPDATED MUSEUM SHIPS SCHEDULE B – UPDATED COMPASS MARITIME SERVICES DESKTOP VALUATION CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE C – UPDATED VALUATION REPORT ON MACHINERY, EQUIPMENT AND RELATED ASSETS SCHEDULE D – LETTER FROM BELLEHOLME MANAGEMENT INC. PART II S.S. KEEWATIN – ESTIMATE OF FAIR MARKET VALUE NOVEMBER 2017 SCHEDULE 1 – SHIPS LAUNCHED IN 1907 SCHEDULE 2 – MUSEUM SHIPS APPENDIX 1 – JUSTIFICATION FOR OUTSTANDING SIGNIFICANCE & NATIONAL IMPORTANCE OF S.S. KEEWATIN 1907 APPENDIX 2 – THE NORTH AMERICAN MARINE, INC. REPORT OF INSPECTION APPENDIX 3 – COMPASS MARITIME SERVICES INDEPENDENT VALUATION REPORT APPENDIX 4 – CULTURAL PERSONAL PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT APPENDIX 5 – BELLEHOME MANAGEMENT INC. 5 October 2018 The RJ and Diane Peterson Keewatin Foundation 311 Talbot Street PO Box 189 Port McNicoll, ON L0K 1R0 Ladies & Gentlemen We are pleased to enclose an Updated Valuation Report, setting out, at September 2018, our Estimate of Fair Market Value of the Museum Ship S.S. Keewatin, which its owner, Skyline (Port McNicoll) Development Inc., intends to donate to the RJ and Diane Peterson Keewatin Foundation (the “Foundation”). It is prepared to accompany an application by the Foundation for the Canadian Cultural Property Export Review Board. This Updated Valuation Report, for the reasons set out in it, estimates the Fair Market Value of a proposed donation of the S.S. Keewatin to the Foundation at FORTY-EIGHT MILLION FOUR HUNDRED AND SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($48,475,000) and the effective date is the date of this Report.
    [Show full text]