DOCSLIB.ORG

2011 Status of the Stocks Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2011 Status of the Stocks Report Technical Fisheries Committee Administrative Report 2011: Status of Lake Trout and Lake Whitefish Populations in the 1836 Treaty-Ceded Waters of Lakes Superior, Huron, and Michigan, with Recommended Yield and Effort Levels for 2011 A Report Submitted by the Modeling Subcommittee to the Technical Fisheries Committee D.C. Caroffino (Michigan Department of Natural Resources), S.J. Lenart (United States Fish and Wildlife Service), Editors Recommended Citation formats: Entire report: Modeling Subcommittee, Technical Fisheries Committee. 2011. Technical Fisheries Committee Administrative Report 2011: Status of Lake Trout and Lake Whitefish Populations in the 1836 Treaty-Ceded Waters of Lakes Superior, Huron and Michigan, with recommended yield and effort levels for 2011. http://www.michigan.gov/greatlakesconsentdecree Section: Caroffino, D.C. and Lenart, S.J. 2011. Executive Summary in Caroffino, D.C., and Lenart, S.J., eds. Technical Fisheries Committee Administrative Report 2011: Status of Lake Trout and Lake Whitefish Populations in the 1836 Treaty-Ceded Waters of Lakes Superior, Huron and Michigan, with recommended yield and effort levels for 2011. http://www.michigan.gov/greatlakesconsentdecree 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary...................................................................................................... 4 Stock Assessment Models............................................................................................. 9 Priority Work for Future Assessments........................................................................ 19 Status of Lake Trout Populations................................................................................ 22 Lake Superior .............................................................................................................. 22 MI-5 (Marquette - Big Bay)..................................................................................... 22 MI-6 (Au Train - Munising) .................................................................................... 26 MI-7 (Grand Marais)................................................................................................ 30 MI-8 (Whitefish Bay) .............................................................................................. 32 Lake Huron ................................................................................................................. 34 MH-1 (Northern Lake Huron) ................................................................................. 34 MH-2 (North-central Lake Huron) .......................................................................... 37 Lake Michigan ............................................................................................................ 39 MM-123 (Northern Treaty Waters) ......................................................................... 39 MM-4 (Grand Traverse Bay)................................................................................... 43 MM-5 (Leelanau Peninsula to Arcadia) .................................................................. 47 MM-67 (Southern Treaty Waters) ........................................................................... 51 Status of Lake Whitefish Populations......................................................................... 53 Lake Superior .............................................................................................................. 53 WFS-04 (Marquette - Big Bay) ............................................................................... 53 WFS-05 (Munising)................................................................................................. 57 WFS-06 (Grand Marais) .......................................................................................... 60 WFS-07 (Tahquamenon Bay).................................................................................. 61 WFS-08 (Brimley) ................................................................................................... 65 Lake Huron ................................................................................................................. 69 Northern Huron (WFH-01 to WFH-04)................................................................... 69 WFH-05 (Alpena) .................................................................................................... 74 Lake Michigan ............................................................................................................ 78 WFM-01 (Bays de Noc)........................................................................................... 78 WFM-02 (Manistique)............................................................................................. 82 WFM-03 (Naubinway)............................................................................................. 86 WFM-04 (Beaver Island)......................................................................................... 90 WFM-05 (Grand Traverse Bay)............................................................................... 96 WFM-06 (Leland - Frankfort) ............................................................................... 101 WFM-07 (Ludington) ............................................................................................ 105 WFM-08 (Muskegon) ............................................................................................ 109 Appendix 1. Lake whitefish management units....................................................... 113 Appendix 2. Lake trout management units.............................................................. 114 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prepared by David C. Caroffino and Stephen J. Lenart In August 2000, Bay Mills Indian 1836 Treaty-ceded waters. The MSC Community, Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of developed and fit statistical catch-at-age Chippewa Indians, Grand Traverse Band (SCAA) models using a nonlinear of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians, Little modeling and statistics program (AD Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians, Model Builder, Otter Research Ltd.) to Little River Band of Ottawa Indians, the estimate age- and year-specific United States of America, and the State population abundance and mortality of Michigan settled upon a negotiated rates. Insufficient data prevented agreement (Consent Decree) to resolve development of reliable SCAA models issues of allocation, management, and in three lake whitefish units, so an regulation of fishing in 1836 Treaty- alternative approach was used for setting ceded waters of lakes Superior, harvest limits. The estimates of Michigan, and Huron (U.S. v. Michigan abundance and mortality were combined 2000). The provisions of the Consent with growth and maturity data for Decree were to be implemented by the whitefish and lake trout in each stock or five tribes of the Chippewa/Ottawa management unit to project Resource Authority (CORA), the United recommended yield levels for the 2011 States Department of Interior’s U.S. Fish fishing season. Recommended yield and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and the limits were obtained by either limiting State of Michigan’s Department of mortality to a maximum rate or Natural Resources (MDNR). The achieving a minimum spawning Consent Decree outlines a specific lake potential reduction. The maximum trout management regime that regulates allowable mortality rate (A) on whitefish the fishery though yield and effort limits was 65%, while the maximum mortality established through maximum lake trout rate on lake trout was either 40, 45, or mortality rates. In management units 47%, depending on the management where the state and tribes share the unit. The target spawning potential commercial whitefish harvest, maximum reduction for whitefish was 20%. whitefish mortality rates are regulated Harvest limits were allocated to State with yield limits for each party. The and CORA fisheries for each stock Consent Decree provides specific following the percentages for 2011 guidelines on how these yield and effort specified in the Consent Decree. limits are to be calculated. A Modeling The 2011 model-generated harvest Subcommittee (MSC) of the Technical limits for whitefish and lake trout are Fisheries Committee (TFC) was provided in the table below as are the established and charged with developing actual harvest and effort limits that were the annual yield and effort limits imposed based on the terms of the required by the Consent Decree. Consent Decree or harvest regulation For 2011, the MSC assessed guidelines (HRGs). This report provides population status and mortality rates of details when recommended and actual 13 different stocks of lake whitefish and harvest limits differ in management nine stocks of lake trout that are within units. 4 Management Model-generated Actual yield Gill net limit Species Lake unit yield limit (lb) limit (lb) (ft) Lake trout Superior MI-5 109,646 109,646 NA MI-6 118,372 118,372 3,182,000 MI-7 72,903 80,911 3,112,000 Huron MH-1* 436,856 245,000 MH-2 94,365 91,804 NA Michigan MM-123* 0 503,000 15,675,000 MM-4* 73,231 214,626 1,193,000 MM-5* 119,169 119,169 470,000 MM-67 362,570 362,570 NA Lake Superior WFS-04 95,000 95,000 NA whitefish WFS-05 408,000 408,000 NA WFS-06 No model estimate 210,000 NA WFS-07 871,500 514,000 NA WFS-08 167,700 167,700 NA Huron Northern 719,600 719,600 NA Combined WFH-05 1,142,000 758,300 Michigan WFM-01 3,644,000 3,644,000 NA WFM-02 1,580,500 558,000 NA WFM-03 2,510,000 2,510,000 NA WFM-04 702,000 702,000 NA WFM-05 399,000 399,000 NA WFM-06 604,000 250,000 NA WFM-07 No model estimate 500,000 NA WFM-08 1,300,200
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Great Lakes Islands: Biodiversity Elements And
    GREAT LAKES ISLANDS: BIODIVERSITY ELEMENTS AND THREATS A FINAL REPORT TO THE GREAT LAKES NATIONAL PROGRAM OFFICE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AUGUST 6, 2007 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Funding for this project has been provided by the Great Lakes Program Office (GLNPO) of the Environmental Protection Agency (Grant No. Gl-96521901: Framework for the Binational Conservation of Great Lakes Islands). We especially appreciated the support of our project officer, K. Rodriquez, and G. Gulezian, director of the GLNPO. Project team members were F. Cuthbert (University of Minnesota), D. Ewert (The Nature Conservancy), R. Greenwood (U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service), D. Kraus (The Nature Conservancy of Canada), M. Seymour (U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service), K. Vigmostad (Principal Investigator, formerly of Northeast-Midwest Institute), and L. Wires (University of Minnesota). Team members for the Ontario portion of the project included W. Bakowsky (NHIC), B. Crins (Ontario Parks), J. Mackenzie (NHIC) and M. McMurtry (NHIC). GIS and technical support for this project has been provided by T. Krahn (Provincial Geomatics Service Centre, OMNR), J. Slatts (The Nature Conservancy), and G. White (The Nature Conservancy of Canada). Many others have provided scientific and policy support for this project. We particularly want to recognize M. DePhillips (The Nature Conservancy), G. Jackson (Parks Canada), B. Manny (Great Lakes Science Center), and C. Vasarhelyi (policy consultant). Cover photograph: A Bay on Gibraltar Island (Lake Erie) ©2005 Karen E. Vigmostad 2 Contents
    [Show full text]
  • NOAA Great Lakes Charts Catalog Reference
    Charts on the Great Lakes and Adjacent Waters 96° 94° Data On the Great Lakes System Chart Number Title Scale Chart Number Title Scale Chart Number Title Scale LAKE LAKE LAKE LAKE LAKE LAKE 14500 Great Lakes—Lake Champlain to Lake of the Woods 1:1,500,000 14847 Toledo Harbor 1:20,000 14915 Little Bay de Noc 1:30,000 GENERAL LAKE DIMENSION SUPERIOR MICHIGAN HURON ST. CLAIR ERIE ONTARIO ST. LAWRENCE RIVER Entrance Channel 1:40,000 14916 SMALL-CRAFT BOOK CHART Length in miles 350 307 206 26 241 193 14770 Morristown, N.Y. to Butternut Bay, Ont. 1:15,000 14848 Detroit River 1:30,000 Lake Winnebago and Lower Fox River (book of 34 charts) Various 14850 Lake St. Clair 1:60,000 14917 Menominee and Marinette Harbors 1:15,000 14500 Breadth in miles 160 118(1) 183(2) 24 57 53 14771 Butternut Bay, Ont., to Ironsides lsland., N.Y. 1:15,000 Length in coastline (including islands) 2,730 1,640 3,830(3) 257 871 712 14772 Ironsides lsland, N.Y., to Bingham lsland, Ont. 1:15,000 14852 St. Clair River 1:40,000 14918 Head of Green Bay, including Fox River below De Pere 1:25,000 Area in square miles 14773 Gananoque, Ont., to St. Lawrence Park. N.Y. 1:15,000 Head of St. Clair River 1:15,000 Green Bay 1:10,000 1450 Water Surface, United States 20,600(4) 22,300(5) 9,150(6) 198(7) 4,980 3,560(8) 14774 Round lsland, N.Y., and Gananoque, Ont., to Wolfe l., Ont.
    [Show full text]
  • HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN Green Bay and Gravel Island
    HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN Green Bay and Gravel Island National Wildlife Refuges October 2017 Habitat Management Plans provide long-term guidance for management decisions; set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accomplish refuge purposes; and, identify the Fish and Wildlife Service’s best estimate of future needs. These plans detail program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget allocations and as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. The plans do not constitute a commitment for staffing increases, operational and maintenance increases, or funding for future land acquisition. The National Wildlife Refuge System, managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, is the world's premier system of public lands and waters set aside to conserve America's fish, wildlife, and plants. Since the designation of the first wildlife refuge in 1903, the System has grown to encompass more than 150 million acres, 556 national wildlife refuges and other units of the Refuge System, plus 38 wetland management districts. This page intentionally left blank. Habitat Management Plan for Green Bay and Gravel Island National Wildlife Refuges EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Habitat Management Plan (HMP) provides vision and specific guidance on enhancing and managing habitat for the resources of concern (ROC) at the refuge. The contributions of the refuge to ecosystem- and landscape-scale wildlife and biodiversity conservation, specifically migratory waterfowl, are incorporated into this HMP. The HMP is intended to provide habitat management direction for the next 15 years. The HMP is also needed to ensure that the refuge continues to conserve habitat for migratory birds in the context of climate change, which affects all units of the National Wildlife Refuge System.
    [Show full text]
  • Seaway Story JA09.Qxd:Feature MASTER
    INLAND SUPERHIGHWAY For half a century, the St. Lawrence Seaway has served as a critical artery for ships carrying the coal, grain and iron ore that fuelled Canada’s economy. But a sea change may be brewing. BY D’ARCY JENISH WITH PHOTOGRAPHY BY MARTIN BEAULIEU With three blasts of its horn — two long and one Fifty years is a major milestone, yet the short, a traditional maritime greeting — the CSL Spruceglen sails into the St. Lambert Lock, on the eastern shore of the speeches are brief and businesslike. St. Lawrence River, opposite downtown Montréal. It’s just after noon on March 31, 2009, and right on schedule, the After stopping for less than an hour at Wfreighter glides to a stop. Deckhands feed thick, braided steel lines to a pair of lockmen, who secure the ship. The lock the St. Lambert Lock, the Spruceglen operator opens a set of intake valves, each large enough to accommodate a compact car, and millions of litres of water resumes its journey. rush into the chamber. As the ship rises — it will be lifted about five metres in less than 10 minutes — the port side of its hull forms an imposing black wall that cuts off our view of Parc Mont-Royal and the Montréal skyline. The Spruceglen is 222.5 metres long and 23 metres wide, and it fits into the 24.4-metre-wide lock like a hand in a glove. Deckhands lower a gangplank, and two smartly dressed officers disembark. Captain Mark Dillon and Chief The CSL Spruceglen Engineer Christian Pelletier are wearing navy blue suits (TOP) breaks a blue with crisp white shirts and neatly knotted, matching blue ties.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Sturgeon Assessment by Great Lakes Commercial Fishers 2001
    Lake Sturgeon Assessment Assistance by Great Lakes Commercial Fishers 2001-2002 March 2003 Emily C. Zollweg, Editor, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Lower Great Lakes Fishery Resources Office, 405 N. French Rd, Suite 120A, Amherst, New York 14228, USA; (716) 691-5456; FAX (716) 691-6154; [email protected] Brian J. Gunderman and Robert F. Elliott, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Green Bay Fishery Resources Office, 2661 Scott Tower Drive, New Franken, Wisconsin 54229, USA; (920) 866-1755; FAX (920) 866-1710; [email protected], [email protected] Adam Kowalski and Tracy D. Hill, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Alpena Fishery Resources Office, 145 Water St., Alpena, Michigan 49707, USA; (989) 356- 5102; FAX (989) 356-6154; [email protected], [email protected] Glenn Miller, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ashland Fishery Resources Office, 2800 Lakeshore Drive East, Ashland, Wisconsin 54806, USA; (715) 682-6185; FAX (715) 682-8899; [email protected] ABSTRACT Currently there is no commercial fishing for lake sturgeon, (Acipenser fulvescens), in U. S. waters of the Great Lakes and sport fishing is limited. Canada allows commercial harvest from Ontario waters of Lake Huron only. Lake sturgeon is considered threatened or endangered by 19 of the 20 states within its original range in the U.S. Lake sturgeon abundance was reduced dramatically in the late 1800’s by commercial overfishing and habitat degradation. The life history characteristics of lake sturgeon, late maturity and infrequent spawning after maturity, prevent populations from rebounding quickly after such catastrophes. Fishery agencies are providing training and equipment to commercial fishers for data collection from lake sturgeon.
    [Show full text]
  • Shipwreck Journaljournal — Page 3 Journal of the Great Lakes Shipwreck Historical Society Spring / Summer 2012 • Volume 30 No
    Whitefish Point History is Alive at ShipwreckShipwreck JournalJournal — page 3 Journal of the Great Lakes Shipwreck Historical Society Spring / Summer 2012 • Volume 30 No. 1 / 2 R.V. David Boyd Launched for 2012 Shipwreck Hunting (Story on Page 2) R.V. David Boyd is launched into the St. Marys River at the Cloverland Hydroelectric Plant in Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan, June 29, 2012. PHOTO BY BRUCE LYNN Featured Whitefish Point Shipwreck Search The Shipwreck Special Events in this Issue: Homecomings • by Sea & Air • Coast’s First Victim • at Whitefish Point Whitefish Point Homecomings It is amazing how many shipping, lighthouse, Hagan also contacted some of his former and lifesaving station stories along Superior’s Coast Guard crew to solicit information. He Shipwreck Coast bring a focus to Whitefish Point. contacted Chuck Nemmo, who served with him at Visitors often bring personal and family history to Whitefish for 2 years. In addition, he tried to contact share with us and to help enrich our historical re- Terry Repking, whom he later found out had passed cords. I frequently get requests from front-line staff away in March 1993 leaving 2 young daughters to rush over to the museum to meet a guest with a behind. Dennis commented that “Sometimes look- story. I must say these are very rewarding encounters ing for people isn’t all that much fun.” Chroniclers because we get a chance to learn from recollections of history come face to face with the fact that we are and pictures of actual people who served along the here but a brief moment in time in the big scheme of coast.
    [Show full text]
  • 22 AUG 2021 Index Acadia Rock 14967
    19 SEP 2021 Index 543 Au Sable Point 14863 �� � � � � 324, 331 Belle Isle 14976 � � � � � � � � � 493 Au Sable Point 14962, 14963 �� � � � 468 Belle Isle, MI 14853, 14848 � � � � � 290 Index Au Sable River 14863 � � � � � � � 331 Belle River 14850� � � � � � � � � 301 Automated Mutual Assistance Vessel Res- Belle River 14852, 14853� � � � � � 308 cue System (AMVER)� � � � � 13 Bellevue Island 14882 �� � � � � � � 346 Automatic Identification System (AIS) Aids Bellow Island 14913 � � � � � � � 363 A to Navigation � � � � � � � � 12 Belmont Harbor 14926, 14928 � � � 407 Au Train Bay 14963 � � � � � � � � 469 Benson Landing 14784 � � � � � � 500 Acadia Rock 14967, 14968 � � � � � 491 Au Train Island 14963 � � � � � � � 469 Benton Harbor, MI 14930 � � � � � 381 Adams Point 14864, 14880 �� � � � � 336 Au Train Point 14969 � � � � � � � 469 Bete Grise Bay 14964 � � � � � � � 475 Agate Bay 14966 �� � � � � � � � � 488 Avon Point 14826� � � � � � � � � 259 Betsie Lake 14907 � � � � � � � � 368 Agate Harbor 14964� � � � � � � � 476 Betsie River 14907 � � � � � � � � 368 Agriculture, Department of� � � � 24, 536 B Biddle Point 14881 �� � � � � � � � 344 Ahnapee River 14910 � � � � � � � 423 Biddle Point 14911 �� � � � � � � � 444 Aids to navigation � � � � � � � � � 10 Big Bay 14932 �� � � � � � � � � � 379 Baby Point 14852� � � � � � � � � 306 Air Almanac � � � � � � � � � � � 533 Big Bay 14963, 14964 �� � � � � � � 471 Bad River 14863, 14867 � � � � � � 327 Alabaster, MI 14863 � � � � � � � � 330 Big Bay 14967 �� � � � � � � � � � 490 Baileys
    [Show full text]
  • Shipwreck Coast National Marine Sanctuary Proposal
    Shipwreck Coast National Marine Sanctuary Nomination, Lake Superior, MI Shipwreck Coast National Marine Sanctuary Proposal Lake Superior, Michigan – 2017 1 12-1-2017 Shipwreck Coast National Marine Sanctuary Nomination, Lake Superior, MI Section I - Basics Nomination Title: Shipwreck Coast National Marine Sanctuary, Lake Superior, MI Nominator Name(s) and Affiliation(s): Darryl Ertel of the Whitefish Point Underwater Preserve (WPUP) one of the State of Michigan’s 13 designated underwater preserves, which operates under the authority of the Paradise Area Tourism Council a 501C3 not for profit organization, serves as the nominator on behalf of a truly grass roots group of supporting affiliate collaborators and supporters as presented under Consideration 7. Nomination Point of Contact - Name, Phone, Email, Address Darryl Ertel P.O. Box 318 Paradise, MI 49768 810-247-4583 [email protected] Section II - Introduction Narrative Description – a brief overview of the nomination This nomination area resides within the Michigan waters of Lake Superior described by noted Great Lakes shipwreck author, Frederick Stonehouse, in his book “Lake Superior’s Shipwreck Coast”. Stonehouse writes therein “If there is truly a graveyard of Lake Superior, it is the general area of Whitefish Point. More vessels have been lost there than any other part of the lake.” Stonehouse lists over 100 vessels lost between Grand Marais MI, west of Whitefish Point and Pt. Iroquois MI, southeast of Whitefish Point. Less than half of these shipwrecks have been found and documented to date. Several shipwrecks of historical significance have been found in amazingly well-preserved condition including the Comet, Cowle, Vienna, Osborn, and Mather as documented in GLSHS’ project report “The Art and Science of Mapping Lake Superior’s Shipwrecks: Ghosts of the Shipwreck Coast” 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Summary
    Seasonal Summary Great Lakes Winter 2019-2020 By the North American Ice Service Summary for the Great Lakes The 2019-2020 Great Lakes ice season can be summarized by a well below normal ice cover, below normal ice thickness, and below normal extent. The well below normal ice cover was driven by warmer than normal temperatures across the Great Lakes basin for the winter season. Although the year started similar to the previous season (2018/19) with ice formation in mid-November and early December, there was a significant divergence in the weather by the the end of December. Widespread across the Great Lakes basin, average daily temperatures were on the scale of 3-4 degrees Celsius above normal in January, usually the time of year when we see significant expansion of the ice cover. The total accumulated ice coverage (TAC) for the past season (for the historical weeks of 4 December to 4 June) was 4.8%. This is the 5th lowest TAC on record since the 1972/73 season and the lowest since the 2015/16 season. Peak ice coverage on the Great Lakes occured in the week of February 19th 2020, 3 weeks before the climatological normal for peak ice. The ice coverage at the time was 18.6%, less than half the amount of the climate median peak of 39.8%. The peak of 18.6% is the 6th lowest maximum extent of ice since the 1972/73 season. The record low maximum ice extent continues to be 11.6% occuring in the 2011-2012 season.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Research Priorities for Lake Whitefish in the Upper Great
    DEVELOPING RESEARCH PRIORITIES FOR LAKE WHITEFISH IN THE UPPER GREAT LAKES: RESULTS OF A WORKSHOP SPONSORED BY THE GREAT LAKES FISHERY TRUST AND GREAT LAKES FISHERY COMMISSION Michigan State University February 27-28, 2018 Michigan Sea Grant Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 3 Workshop Proceedings ................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 Workshop Goals and Desired Outcomes ............................................................................. 4 Presentations ....................................................................................................................... 4 Impacts of Whitefish Decline on the Tribal Commercial Fishery ..................................... 4 Lake Huron Lake Whitefish Status and Trends ................................................................ 5 Lake Michigan Lake Whitefish Status and Trends ............................................................ 7 Lake Superior Lake Whitefish Status and Trends ............................................................. 8 Lower Trophic Levels ........................................................................................................ 9 Factors affecting recruitment to fisheries and management implications ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Peninsula
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF MICHIGAN. For this object I have zealously worked. How far I have succeeded in the effort the reader may judge; and I shall feel well satisfied if he finds the picture I give worth UPPER PENINSULA attentive study, without having it surrounded by a 1869-1873 borrowed glistening frame, composed of a collection of ACCOMPANIED BY AN items from almost every branch of human knowledge. ATLAS OF MAPS. Very respectfully yours, C. ROMINGER. VOL. I. PART III. PALÆOZOIC ROCKS. INTRODUCTION. BY DR. C. ROMINGER BY the Legislative Assembly of 1871, the continuation of a geological survey of the State of Michigan was determined upon, in such a manner as to divide the work PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF THE LEGISLATURE OF into three districts, each of which was to be investigated MICHIGAN. independently by different parties. UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE BOARD OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. The third district, intrusted to me, comprises the Lower Peninsula, and the eastern half of the Upper Peninsula, NEW YORK or that portion which Is not included in the iron and JULIUS BIEN copper regions. Its surface rock is exclusively 1873 composed of members of the palæozoic series; while In Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1873, by the other two, older crystalline and metamorphic rocks GOVERNOR J. J. BAGLEY, prevail. for the State of Michigan, in the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington. On the Lower Peninsula only a partial reconnoissance TO THE HONORABLE BOARD OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF tour has been made through Little Traverse Bay region.
    [Show full text]
  • Shipwreck Journaljournal Journal of the Great Lakes Shipwreck Historical Society Volume 33 No
    PBS “Globe Trekker” series visits Shipwreck Museum – page 8 ShipwreckShipwreck JournalJournal Journal of the Great Lakes Shipwreck Historical Society Volume 33 No. 3/4 2016 Wreckage from the Griffin found …in Lake Superior! ~Also in this Issue~ Shipwreck Society on Television “The Boyd made another Status Update: pass and the crew knew Motor Lifeboat CG 36381 & Motor Lifeboat House that this was something Henry B. Smith Shipwreck of interest…It rested Expedition in approximately 270’ Summer Appeal Results of cold Lake Superior …and more! water.” GRIFFIN SHIP PHOTO COURTESY PAUL LAMARRE, JR. / PAUL C. LAMARRE, III like any organization with a hard-working staff and Board of Directors…we like to hear how we are doing! Good and bad. We often hear from our visitors and through such social media entities as tripadvisor/facebook and the vast majority of this feedback is extremely positive. We’ve even been recognized by fellow historical organizations, regional magazines and area niche groups. You will read about a few recent honors that the Shipwreck Society has garnered in this issue of the Shipwreck Journal as well as some of New deck and entryway, Motor Lifeboat House the long term historic preservation projects that are very close to completion. A few are just getting underway and we’ll tell you about those too. Our short summer season also means that we have to squeeze in as much time on the water, and onboard the R/V David Boyd, as possible before the dramatic autumn weather sets-in. Our Director of Marine Operations, Darryl Ertel Jr., and the crew of the Boyd covered much territory in 2016.
    [Show full text]