Seaway Story JA09.Qxd:Feature MASTER
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Environmental Assessment Summary Report
Environmental Assessment Summary Report Project and Environmental Description November 2012 Transport Canada New Bridge for the St. Lawrence Environmental Assessment Summary Report Project and Environmental Description November 2012 TC Ref.: T8080-110362 Dessau Ref.: 068-P-0000810-0-00-110-01-EN-R-0002-0C TABLE OF CONTENT GLOSSARY......................................................................................................................................VII 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND AND LOCATION .................................................................... 1 1.2 LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT............................. 2 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION............................................................................................................7 2.1 PLANNED COMPONENTS AND VARIATIONS................................................................. 7 2.1.1 Reconstruction and expansion of Highway 15 (Component A) .......................................... 7 2.1.2 New Nuns’ Island Bridge (Component B) ........................................................................... 7 2.1.3 Work on Nuns’ Island (Component C) ................................................................................ 8 2.1.4 The New Bridge for the St. Lawrence (Component D) ..................................................... 11 2.1.4.1 Components D1a and D1b: crossing the St. Lawrence -
NOAA Great Lakes Charts Catalog Reference
Charts on the Great Lakes and Adjacent Waters 96° 94° Data On the Great Lakes System Chart Number Title Scale Chart Number Title Scale Chart Number Title Scale LAKE LAKE LAKE LAKE LAKE LAKE 14500 Great Lakes—Lake Champlain to Lake of the Woods 1:1,500,000 14847 Toledo Harbor 1:20,000 14915 Little Bay de Noc 1:30,000 GENERAL LAKE DIMENSION SUPERIOR MICHIGAN HURON ST. CLAIR ERIE ONTARIO ST. LAWRENCE RIVER Entrance Channel 1:40,000 14916 SMALL-CRAFT BOOK CHART Length in miles 350 307 206 26 241 193 14770 Morristown, N.Y. to Butternut Bay, Ont. 1:15,000 14848 Detroit River 1:30,000 Lake Winnebago and Lower Fox River (book of 34 charts) Various 14850 Lake St. Clair 1:60,000 14917 Menominee and Marinette Harbors 1:15,000 14500 Breadth in miles 160 118(1) 183(2) 24 57 53 14771 Butternut Bay, Ont., to Ironsides lsland., N.Y. 1:15,000 Length in coastline (including islands) 2,730 1,640 3,830(3) 257 871 712 14772 Ironsides lsland, N.Y., to Bingham lsland, Ont. 1:15,000 14852 St. Clair River 1:40,000 14918 Head of Green Bay, including Fox River below De Pere 1:25,000 Area in square miles 14773 Gananoque, Ont., to St. Lawrence Park. N.Y. 1:15,000 Head of St. Clair River 1:15,000 Green Bay 1:10,000 1450 Water Surface, United States 20,600(4) 22,300(5) 9,150(6) 198(7) 4,980 3,560(8) 14774 Round lsland, N.Y., and Gananoque, Ont., to Wolfe l., Ont. -
Kahnawà:Ke's Waste Management
2016-2020 Waste Management Plan for the Kahnawà:ke Mohawk Territory February 2016 Revised May 2016 1 Work Team 2016-2020 Waste Management Plan for the Kahnawà:ke Mohawk Territory May 2016 Holly McComber Environmental Technologist Kahnawà:ke Environment Protection Office In collaboration with Monique Clément, B.Sc. DGE Recycologue Gestion des matières résiduelles formation - conférence – vulgarisation Téléphone : 819-835-0833 Courriel: [email protected] www.moniqueclement.ca 2 Table of Contents 1 Geographic and socio-economic description of the community ............................. 5 1.1 Description of Kahnawà:ke Mohawk Territory ................................................. 5 1.2 Description of the community organization ....................................................... 6 1.3 Community socio-economical profile .................................................................. 6 2 Existing Waste Management Infrastructure ............................................................... 7 2.1 Infrastructures within the community ................................................................ 7 2.1.1 Recycling Depot Operations ......................................................................... 7 2.1.2 Transfer Depot Operation ............................................................................. 8 2.2 Infrastructures and organisations outside the community ............................ 10 3 Current waste management services and practices ................................................. 14 3.1 Residential recycling -
Zone 8 29 September 2021 | 05 H 30 Zone 8
Zone 8 29 September 2021 | 05 h 30 Zone 8 Maps Zone map (PDF 884 Kb) Interactive map of fishing zones Fishing periods and quotas See the zone's fishing periods and quotas Zone's fishing periods, limits and exceptions (PDF) Printable version. Length limits for some species It is prohibited to catch and keep or have in your possession a fish from the waters specified that does not comply with the length limits indicated for your zone. If a fish species or a zone is not mentioned in the table, no length limit applies to the species in this zone. The fish must be kept in a state allowing its identification. Walleye May keep Walleye between 37 cm and 53 cm inclusively No length limit for sauger. State of fish Whole, gutted or wallet filleted Learn how to distinguish walleye from sauger. Muskellunge May keep Muskellunge all length Exceptions May keep muskellunge 111 cm or more in the portion of the St. Lawrence River located in zone 8, including the following water bodies: lac Saint-Louis, rapides de Lachine, bassin La Zone 8 Page 2 29 September 2021 | 05 h 30 Prairie, rivière des Mille Îles, rivière des Prairies, lac des Deux Montagnes, and the part of the rivière Outaouais located in zone 8. May keep muskellunge 137 cm or more in lac Saint-François. State of fish Whole or gutted Lake trout (including splake trout) May keep Lake trout 60 cm or more State of fish Whole or gutted, only where a length limit applies. Elsewhere, lake trout may be whole or filleted. -
Lake Sturgeon Assessment by Great Lakes Commercial Fishers 2001
Lake Sturgeon Assessment Assistance by Great Lakes Commercial Fishers 2001-2002 March 2003 Emily C. Zollweg, Editor, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Lower Great Lakes Fishery Resources Office, 405 N. French Rd, Suite 120A, Amherst, New York 14228, USA; (716) 691-5456; FAX (716) 691-6154; [email protected] Brian J. Gunderman and Robert F. Elliott, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Green Bay Fishery Resources Office, 2661 Scott Tower Drive, New Franken, Wisconsin 54229, USA; (920) 866-1755; FAX (920) 866-1710; [email protected], [email protected] Adam Kowalski and Tracy D. Hill, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Alpena Fishery Resources Office, 145 Water St., Alpena, Michigan 49707, USA; (989) 356- 5102; FAX (989) 356-6154; [email protected], [email protected] Glenn Miller, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ashland Fishery Resources Office, 2800 Lakeshore Drive East, Ashland, Wisconsin 54806, USA; (715) 682-6185; FAX (715) 682-8899; [email protected] ABSTRACT Currently there is no commercial fishing for lake sturgeon, (Acipenser fulvescens), in U. S. waters of the Great Lakes and sport fishing is limited. Canada allows commercial harvest from Ontario waters of Lake Huron only. Lake sturgeon is considered threatened or endangered by 19 of the 20 states within its original range in the U.S. Lake sturgeon abundance was reduced dramatically in the late 1800’s by commercial overfishing and habitat degradation. The life history characteristics of lake sturgeon, late maturity and infrequent spawning after maturity, prevent populations from rebounding quickly after such catastrophes. Fishery agencies are providing training and equipment to commercial fishers for data collection from lake sturgeon. -
Shipwreck Journaljournal — Page 3 Journal of the Great Lakes Shipwreck Historical Society Spring / Summer 2012 • Volume 30 No
Whitefish Point History is Alive at ShipwreckShipwreck JournalJournal — page 3 Journal of the Great Lakes Shipwreck Historical Society Spring / Summer 2012 • Volume 30 No. 1 / 2 R.V. David Boyd Launched for 2012 Shipwreck Hunting (Story on Page 2) R.V. David Boyd is launched into the St. Marys River at the Cloverland Hydroelectric Plant in Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan, June 29, 2012. PHOTO BY BRUCE LYNN Featured Whitefish Point Shipwreck Search The Shipwreck Special Events in this Issue: Homecomings • by Sea & Air • Coast’s First Victim • at Whitefish Point Whitefish Point Homecomings It is amazing how many shipping, lighthouse, Hagan also contacted some of his former and lifesaving station stories along Superior’s Coast Guard crew to solicit information. He Shipwreck Coast bring a focus to Whitefish Point. contacted Chuck Nemmo, who served with him at Visitors often bring personal and family history to Whitefish for 2 years. In addition, he tried to contact share with us and to help enrich our historical re- Terry Repking, whom he later found out had passed cords. I frequently get requests from front-line staff away in March 1993 leaving 2 young daughters to rush over to the museum to meet a guest with a behind. Dennis commented that “Sometimes look- story. I must say these are very rewarding encounters ing for people isn’t all that much fun.” Chroniclers because we get a chance to learn from recollections of history come face to face with the fact that we are and pictures of actual people who served along the here but a brief moment in time in the big scheme of coast. -
A Brief History of Kahnawà:Ke
CZD-SSSL June 30, 2011 D2 A BRIEF HISTORY OF KAHNAWÀ:KE 1-Overview - written historical records The written records of early explorers, such as Cartier, Noel, and Champlain, place Iroquoian peoples throughout the St. Lawrence Basin. Also the records of missionaries and fur traders, give us a more complete account of Iroquoian cultures and languages in this area. 2-Oral tradition – documentation Documentation of oral traditions of continuous Iroquoian-Iroquois presence in the St. Lawrence Valley and Region is important. In looking at a map of the area, and the historic record the geographical importance of the portages at Lachine and Kahnawà:ke are known. We know the Lachine portage is close to Cartier’s Hochelaga, so the appropriateness of the site for Iroquoian occupation is already established. We also know from Kahnawà:ke oral tradition that the turtle clan was located at the Turtle River (near Delson) and the wolf clan was located at the Wolf River (at Chateauguay). The Bear Clan was located on the north shore of the St. Lawrence just below Lachine and thus these three Mohawk clans controlled the portages and the River itself. 3-Archeological evidence Archeological evidence of early settlement of Iroquois people in the area of the St. Lawrence Valley is evidenced in the historic record or even earlier linguistic reconstructions of the pre contact past. 4-Linguistic and other cultural evidence Evidence from language provides us two kinds of evidence: Cartier’s Iroquoians at Hochelaga- Ohserake and modern Iroquois at Caughnawaga-Kahnawà:ke. If the speakers of contemporary languages can be identified with a particular territory over a period of time, then their attachment to that land can be determined on the basis of this evidence. -
2011 Status of the Stocks Report
Technical Fisheries Committee Administrative Report 2011: Status of Lake Trout and Lake Whitefish Populations in the 1836 Treaty-Ceded Waters of Lakes Superior, Huron, and Michigan, with Recommended Yield and Effort Levels for 2011 A Report Submitted by the Modeling Subcommittee to the Technical Fisheries Committee D.C. Caroffino (Michigan Department of Natural Resources), S.J. Lenart (United States Fish and Wildlife Service), Editors Recommended Citation formats: Entire report: Modeling Subcommittee, Technical Fisheries Committee. 2011. Technical Fisheries Committee Administrative Report 2011: Status of Lake Trout and Lake Whitefish Populations in the 1836 Treaty-Ceded Waters of Lakes Superior, Huron and Michigan, with recommended yield and effort levels for 2011. http://www.michigan.gov/greatlakesconsentdecree Section: Caroffino, D.C. and Lenart, S.J. 2011. Executive Summary in Caroffino, D.C., and Lenart, S.J., eds. Technical Fisheries Committee Administrative Report 2011: Status of Lake Trout and Lake Whitefish Populations in the 1836 Treaty-Ceded Waters of Lakes Superior, Huron and Michigan, with recommended yield and effort levels for 2011. http://www.michigan.gov/greatlakesconsentdecree 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary...................................................................................................... 4 Stock Assessment Models............................................................................................. 9 Priority Work for Future Assessments....................................................................... -
Shipwreck Coast National Marine Sanctuary Proposal
Shipwreck Coast National Marine Sanctuary Nomination, Lake Superior, MI Shipwreck Coast National Marine Sanctuary Proposal Lake Superior, Michigan – 2017 1 12-1-2017 Shipwreck Coast National Marine Sanctuary Nomination, Lake Superior, MI Section I - Basics Nomination Title: Shipwreck Coast National Marine Sanctuary, Lake Superior, MI Nominator Name(s) and Affiliation(s): Darryl Ertel of the Whitefish Point Underwater Preserve (WPUP) one of the State of Michigan’s 13 designated underwater preserves, which operates under the authority of the Paradise Area Tourism Council a 501C3 not for profit organization, serves as the nominator on behalf of a truly grass roots group of supporting affiliate collaborators and supporters as presented under Consideration 7. Nomination Point of Contact - Name, Phone, Email, Address Darryl Ertel P.O. Box 318 Paradise, MI 49768 810-247-4583 [email protected] Section II - Introduction Narrative Description – a brief overview of the nomination This nomination area resides within the Michigan waters of Lake Superior described by noted Great Lakes shipwreck author, Frederick Stonehouse, in his book “Lake Superior’s Shipwreck Coast”. Stonehouse writes therein “If there is truly a graveyard of Lake Superior, it is the general area of Whitefish Point. More vessels have been lost there than any other part of the lake.” Stonehouse lists over 100 vessels lost between Grand Marais MI, west of Whitefish Point and Pt. Iroquois MI, southeast of Whitefish Point. Less than half of these shipwrecks have been found and documented to date. Several shipwrecks of historical significance have been found in amazingly well-preserved condition including the Comet, Cowle, Vienna, Osborn, and Mather as documented in GLSHS’ project report “The Art and Science of Mapping Lake Superior’s Shipwrecks: Ghosts of the Shipwreck Coast” 1. -
Expenditure Budget 2020-2021
EXPENDITURE BUDGET 2020 • 2021 VOL. 7 QUÉBEC INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN 2020 • 2030 EXPENDITURE BUDGET 2020 • 2021 VOL. 7 QUÉBEC INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN 2020 • 2030 This document does not satisfy the Québec government’s Web accessibility standards. However, an assistance service will nonetheless be available upon request to anyone wishing to consult the contents of the document. Please call 418-643-1529 or submit the request by email ([email protected]). The masculine gender is used throughout this document solely to make the text easier to read and therefore applies to both men and women. 2020-2030 Québec Infrastructure Plan Legal Deposit − March 2020 Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec ISBN: 978-2-550-86171-3 (Print Version) ISBN: 978-2-550-86172-0 (Online) ISSN 2563-1225 (Print Version) ISSN 2563-1233 (Online) © Gouvernement du Québec − 2020 Message from the Minister responsible for Government Administration and Chair of the Conseil du trésor The second version of the Québec Infrastructure Plan (QIP) presented by our Government is the response to the colossal challenges that Québec must face in order to maintain and enhance its infrastructure portfolio. QIP investments have reached a historic high, i.e. $130.5 billion over the next 10 years, up $15.1 billion from the last fiscal year. This means a total increase of over $30.1 billion that our Government is dedicating to the QIP for two years, an unprecedented but essential initiative to keep the infrastructure portfolio in good condition and support its growth based on emerging needs. Four priorities have been put forward in the development of the 2020-2030 QIP: education, with an additional $5.9 billion, mainly to expand and build primary and secondary schools; public transit, with an additional $3.3 billion and several new projects under study; health, which will benefit from an additional $2.9 billion, in part to build seniors' residences; and culture, with the deployment of the cultural itinerary of various cultural infrastructure in different regions of Québec. -
Titres Intégrés TRAM
OPUS EN LIGNE Titres exo disponibles 0 TABLE DES MATIÈRES Secteur Chambly-Richelieu-Carignan........................................................................................................................................2 Secteur Haut-Saint-Laurent.........................................................................................................................................................3 Secteur La Presqu’Île.................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Secteur L’Assomption................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Secteur Laurentides.................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Secteur Le Richelain................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Secteur Roussillon...................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Secteur Sainte-Julie.................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Secteur Sorel-Varennes.............................................................................................................................................................10 -
Final Kahnawake Waste Management Plan 2015-2020-25 June 2016
2016-2020 Waste Management Plan for the Kahnawà:ke Mohawk Territory February 2016 Revised May 2016 1 Work Team 2016-2020 Waste Management Plan for the Kahnawà:ke Mohawk Territory May 2016 Holly McComber Environmental Technologist Kahnawà:ke Environment Protection Office In collaboration with Monique Clément, B.Sc. DGE Recycologue Gestion des matières résiduelles formation - conférence – vulgarisation Téléphone : 819-835-0833 Courriel: [email protected] www.moniqueclement.ca 2 Table of Contents 1 Geographic and socio-economic description of the community ............................. 5 1.1 Description of Kahnawà:ke Mohawk Territory ................................................. 5 1.2 Description of the community organization ....................................................... 6 1.3 Community socio-economical profile .................................................................. 6 2 Existing Waste Management Infrastructure ............................................................... 7 2.1 Infrastructures within the community ................................................................ 7 2.1.1 Recycling Depot Operations ......................................................................... 7 2.1.2 Transfer Depot Operation ............................................................................. 8 2.2 Infrastructures and organisations outside the community ............................ 10 3 Current waste management services and practices ................................................. 14 3.1 Residential recycling