Lashkar-E-Taiba: Evolving Into a Hybrid Entity?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lashkar-E-Taiba: Evolving Into a Hybrid Entity? CENTRE FOR LAND WARFARE STUDIES ISSUE BRIEF No. 103 May 2017 Lashkar-e-Taiba: Evolving Into A Hybrid Entity? Brigadier Kuldip Singh (retd), Indian Army he recent statements by Talla Saeed (son of the LeT despite the deteriorated security situation inside Hafiz Saeed), the admission (6 March 2017) Pakistan and persistent pressure from the international Tby Pakistan’s former National Security Advisor community besides India. There is however another Mahmud Ali Durrani that a ‘terrorist group based in his view, that: (i) the LeT—Jama’at-ud-Dawa (JuD) country’ carried out the 2008 Mumbai terror attack, the combine, with its hospitals, universities, social-service National Investigation Agency’s findings (January 2017) wings, etc, is not merely a terrorist organization, but is a that the September 2016 Uri attack was carried out by three-dimensional “hybrid” movement that is emulating the operatives of the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) operatives,1 the Hezbollah or Hamas; (ii) the JuD-LeT combine’s and the February 2016 video-link deposition of David large social service programmes earns it the support of Coleman Headley together bring back focus on the links large swathes of the Pakistani population; and (iii) the of the LeT with Pakistani establishment particularly Pakistani military-ISI may use the JuD-LeT combine, the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). Traditionally, the along with ‘sleeper cells’ and Overground Workers Indian military and intelligence community has looked (OGWs) in India, as a tool to challenge the prevailing at: (i) the LeT as a terror entity which initially had an Indo-Pak conventional forces symmetry. India-specific orientation, but has been pursuing a There is hence a need to examine whether the LeT is trans-regional agenda in the recent years; and (ii) the just a terrorist proxy or whether the JuD-LeT, operating ties between the Pakistan Army/ISI and the LeT from quite freely in Pakistan, and with a large infrastructure a precise prism of “terrorism”. Additionally, the Indian and support base, is gradually turning into a ‘hybrid’ military-intelligence complex often ponders why the entity. However, prior to examining this precise aspect, Pakistani establishment remains unwilling to jettison it is important to analyze the history of the ‘Maktab The Centre for Land Warfare Studies (CLAWS), New Delhi, is an autonomous think tank dealing with national security and conceptual aspects of land warfare, including conventional and sub-conventional conflict and terrorism. CLAWS conducts research that is futuristic and outlook and policy-oriented in approach. Website: www.claws.in Contact us: [email protected] 2 CLAWS al-Khidamat’ and the JuD-LeT, as it highlights the assisted by two banks in Saudi Arabia which channelled similarities in the development of these entities. It funds through 20 NGOs, the most famous of which was is noteworthy that the US government2 has labelled the International Islamic Relief Organisation (IIRO). ‘Maktab al-Khidamat’ (Office of Services or the Afghan Both IIRO and the Islamic Relief Agency functioned Services Bureau) (MaK)3 as the “precursor to Al Qaeda” under the umbrella of the World Islamic League.11 (AQ). According to Michael Scheuer, Head of the CIA’s anti- OBL unit, about $ 600 million passed through OBL’s Brief History: ‘Maktab al-Khidamat’—Al charity fronts between 1980 and 1989, most of it Qaeda through the MaK. It is from the MaK that OBL established the Bait al- The Soviets invaded Afghanistan in December 1979 and Ansar (House of Allies), the military training camps thereafter, the US-Saudi bloc bankrolled the jihad which necessary to train the jihadis and finally, the AQ in saw thousands of mujahideen reach Afghanistan to 1988.12 In April 1988, the former Soviet leader Mikhail fight the Soviets.Between 1980 and 1984, a Palestinian Gorbachev agreed to withdraw from Afghanistan under religious scholar Shaykh Abdullah Azzam,4 realizing the UN-brokered Geneva Accord. Shortly before the that the Arab jihadis fighting in Afghanistan required Soviets withdrew from Afghanistan (February 1989), organization and support,5 established the MaK astride Azzam and OBL decided to form a new vanguard group, the Pakistan-Afghan border. Al-Qaeda al-Sulbah (“The Solid Base”), whose concept According to the CIA’s biography, Osama bin is commonly attributed to the Egyptian theorist Sayyid Laden (OBL) (born in March 1957), deeply influenced Qutb’s vision of a revolutionary Muslim vanguard that by radical Islam while studying, reached Pakistan- would overturn un-Islamic regimes in the Middle East Afghanistan in the early 1980s to assist the mujahideen and establish Islamic rule.13 Azzam too had envisioned in their campaign against the Soviets.6 In Afghanistan, the AQ as an Islamic “rapid reaction force” that would Abdullah Azzam convinced OBL to join his nascent canalize the Afghan mujahideen into fighting on behalf organization, who then utilized his financial connections of ‘oppressed Muslims worldwide’.14 He, however, and business experience to organize the MaK. The MaK did not support killing of non-combatants and terrorist was nurtured by Pakistan’s ISI, which was the CIA’s tactics.15 By the end of 1988, OBL’s relationship with primary conduit for conducting the covert war against Azzam deteriorated on account of various issues. After the Soviets in Afghanistan.7 Azzam was assassinated in a car bomb attack (the late By 1986, MaK had many branches, including in about 1989; Afghanistan), hardliner Ayman al-Zawahiri took 30 cities in the US, collecting donations to support the over as the main ideologue of the AQ. Zawahiri, the jihad against the Soviets. The most important branch mastermind of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad, then began of MaK, called the Al-Kifah Refugee Centre, namely, transforming the AQ into a terrorist organization.16 ‘Brooklyn Jihad Office’, was in New York.8 This Centre was also responsible for recruiting and training jihadis with the CIA’s assistance at shooting ranges Brief History: Jama’at-ud-Dawa-Markaz al- in New York, Pennsylvania, and Connecticut before Dawa wal-Irshad-Lashkar-e-Taiba dispatching them to fight in Afghanistan (the Al-Kifah Zaki-ur Rehman Lakhvi: The Soviet-mujahideen Refugee Center later played a role in the 1993 World conflict was in full bloom when Zaki-ur Rehman Lakhvi Trade Centre bombing9). Another significant branch (the LeT’s ‘military’ commander) moved (1982) from was at the Islamic Center of Tucson, Arizona, which the Pakistan’s Punjab to Paktia (Afghanistan) to participate US counter-terrorism expert Rita Katz10 calls the ‘the in the fighting. In 1984, Lakhvi, a fanatic supporter of first cell of Al Qaeda in the USA’. the Ahl-e-Hadith (AeH) an extreme interpretation of The MaK’s fighting and ‘services’ efforts were Islam, established his own AeH-based militant group. CLAWS 3 Hafiz Muhammad Saeed: Hafiz (LeT’s amir) founded by militants based in Pakistan- was reportedly born in 1950 in Sargodha to a Punjabi Afghanistan. family that had lost many members while migrating to • Both organizations believed in radical strains of Pakistan from India after the Partition (1947). In the Islam. early 1980s, Hafiz Saeed was appointed to General • Just as the killing of Abdullah Azzam allowed Zia ul-Haq’s ‘Council on Islamic Ideology’ and taught OBL-Zawahiri to take control of the AQ and turn Islamic studies at Lahore’s University of Engineering its focus towards terrorism, the deaths of Jamil & Technology. He then went to Saudi Arabia for higher al-Rahman (leader of JDSQ) and Allama Ehsan studies, where he met Abdullah Azzam, OBL’s mentor. Elahi Zaheer (leader of Jamaat AeH) allowed the Azzam encouraged Hafiz Saeed to also start a politico- JuD-MDI to grow stronger. militant-social organization like the MaK. • Both entities had a ‘services’ as well as militant Founding of Jamaat ul-Dawa (JuD) and the wings, gained experience in the Afghan crucible, Markaz al-Dawa wal-Irshad (MDI): In 1985, Hafiz and went on to set-up self-sustaining, social Saeed and another academician, Zafar Iqbal, created service organizations and well-organized JuD, an AeH social organization. The JuD however, militant-terrorist wings. could not gather traction as there already was a major • AQ, the terrorist wing of MaK, was formed in the AeH organization called the ‘Jamaat AeH’, led by a well- latter half of 1988; the LeT in the early 1990. known Pakistani scholar, Allama Ehsan Elahi Zaheer. • Both were aided by the Pakistani military- So, in 1986, Saeed and Lakhvi joined hands, and along intelligence establishment as well as by foreign with foreign militants, set-up the MDI (Center for Call patrons. and Guidance) at Muridke (near Lahore; current HQ of • Like the AQ, the JuD-LeT’s ideological the LeT-JuD).17 Besides ‘social’ activities, the radical framework attracts members from outside of MDI also began fighting alongside the Salafist-adhering Pakistan; it also benefits from a support network ‘Jamaat al-Dawa al-Quran wal-Suna’18 (JDQS) in outside of Pakistan that includes Saudi Arabia.19 Afghanistan. • From the AQ, the LeT learnt that establishing In 1987, three events shaped the final trajectory of networks is the most efficient way to manage the JuD-LeT; (i) the MDI established militant training resources, carry out attacks, and remain resilient. camps in Paktia and Kunar (Afghanistan); over the years, • The LeT’s strategic goals overlap with those of these camps hosted many militant groups including the AQ in many ways. While the relation between the AQ; (ii) Jamil al-Rahman, the leader of JDSQ, died; and AQ and the LeT is complex, both have assisted (iii) Allama Ehsan Elahi Zaheer, the leader of Jamaat each other20 (case of Ramzi Yusuf) as well as AeH, was killed in Lahore.
Recommended publications
  • Religious Extremism and Sectarianism in Pakistan: JRSP, Vol
    Religious Extremism and Sectarianism in Pakistan: JRSP, Vol. 58, No 2 (April-June 2021) Samina Yasmeen1 Fozia Umar2 Religious Extremism and Sectarianism in Pakistan: An Appraisal Abstract Pakistan, which was created on the basis of religion have had to face sectarian violence and religious intolerance from the very beginning. This article offers an in-depth analysis of sectarianism and religious intolerance and their direct role in the current chaotic state of Pakistan. This article revolves around the two main research questions including the role of religion in the state of Pakistan as well as the evidences depicting sectarian violence in Pakistan. The main objective is to analyze the future situation of the rampant sectarian condition in the society and to study the role of Pakistan’s government so far. Qualitative methodology using primary as well as secondary sources are used to gather the data. Post-dictatorship era, after 2007, is being analyzed in this article, keeping in view the history of sectarian violence, future and stability of the state. Last comments lead to the recommendations and ways to tackle the sectarian divide and religious extremism. The researchers conclude that religion is core at the Pakistan’s nationalism however, religious extremism weakens national and social cohesion and also divides loyalties. There is a need for strict blasphemy laws, banning hate speeches which incites the violence and most importantly, eradicating poverty and unemployment, so no foreign elements can bribe anyone for sectarian terror within the state. Introduction Pakistan was a country that was created on the basis of religion, its main goal was to provide a homeland for Muslims where they will live in freedom and harmony and it was established that it will be governed according to the principles set by Islam.
    [Show full text]
  • Reality of Ihyaa Al-Turaath Jamiat Ahle Hadith Jamaat Al-Dawa Page
    Reality of Ihyaa Al-Turaath Jamiat Ahle Hadith Jamaat al-Dawa Page | 1 Reality of Ihyaa Al-Turaath Jamiat Ahle Hadith Jamaat al-Dawa Published by: As-Saabiqoon Publications (SalafiEvents.Com) Twitter: @SalafiEvent Author: Abu Umar (Al-Madinah Al-Nabawiyyah) Copyright 1440/2019 by As-Saabiqoon Publications (SalafiEvents.Com). ALL rights reserved. NO part of this publication may be reproduced, edited, altered in ANY form by ANY means, without the prior written permission of the publisher. NOT FOR SALE PURPOSES FREE e-DISTRIBUTION Page | 2 Reality of Ihyaa Al-Turaath Jamiat Ahle Hadith Jamaat al-Dawa CONTENTS Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………….6 Chapter 1 -Ihyaa Turaath in Pakistan - a brief outline of the activities and their heads 1.1 Ihyaa Al-Turaath and their terrorist activities within Pakistan…………………………………………………………………………………….10 1.2- Abdul Azeez Noorstani- “Ameer” of Ghurabaa, LT and head of Jamia Athariyyah, Peshawar…………….……………………………………….17 1.3- Muslim Dost –“Shaykh” of the ISIS/ Daesh graduate of Noorstani Jamia…………………………………..…………………………………….24 1.4 Aminullaah Peshawari – head of University sponsored by Ihyaa Al-Turaath………………………………………….………………………………………59 1.5 Ghulamullah Rehmati…Pro-Taliban “Shaykh” with strong links with Ihyaa Al-Turaath…………………………..……………………………………63 1.6 Usama Bin Ladin- the common denominator for all the parties associated with Ihyaa Al-Turaath……………………………………………….64 1.7- Mududi and Jamāt Islami –Terrorist Ikhwaan-ul-Muslimeen of Pakistan…………………………………………………………………………………….72 Page | 3 Reality of Ihyaa Al-Turaath Jamiat
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan's Nuclear Weapons
    Pakistan’s Nuclear Weapons Paul K. Kerr Analyst in Nonproliferation Mary Beth Nikitin Specialist in Nonproliferation August 1, 2016 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL34248 Pakistan’s Nuclear Weapons Summary Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal probably consists of approximately 110-130 nuclear warheads, although it could have more. Islamabad is producing fissile material, adding to related production facilities, and deploying additional nuclear weapons and new types of delivery vehicles. Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal is widely regarded as designed to dissuade India from taking military action against Pakistan, but Islamabad’s expansion of its nuclear arsenal, development of new types of nuclear weapons, and adoption of a doctrine called “full spectrum deterrence” have led some observers to express concern about an increased risk of nuclear conflict between Pakistan and India, which also continues to expand its nuclear arsenal. Pakistan has in recent years taken a number of steps to increase international confidence in the security of its nuclear arsenal. Moreover, Pakistani and U.S. officials argue that, since the 2004 revelations about a procurement network run by former Pakistani nuclear official A.Q. Khan, Islamabad has taken a number of steps to improve its nuclear security and to prevent further proliferation of nuclear-related technologies and materials. A number of important initiatives, such as strengthened export control laws, improved personnel security, and international nuclear security cooperation programs, have improved Pakistan’s nuclear security. However, instability in Pakistan has called the extent and durability of these reforms into question. Some observers fear radical takeover of the Pakistani government or diversion of material or technology by personnel within Pakistan’s nuclear complex.
    [Show full text]
  • David Hicks, Mamdouh Habib and the Limits of Australian Citizenship
    9/17/2015 b o r d e r l a n d s e­journal limits of australian citizenship vol 2 no 3 contents VOLUME 2 NUMBER 3, 2003 David Hicks, Mamdouh Habib and the limits of Australian Citizenship Binoy Kampmark University of Queensland I will continue to take an interest in the well­being of Mr Hicks as an Australian citizen to ensure that he is being treated humanely. Alexander Downer, Answer to Question on notice, 18 March 2003. 1. Citizenship is delivered in a brown paper bag at Australian ceremonies. You apply beforehand, and, if lucky, you are asked to attend a ceremony, where you are invited to take an oath (whether to God or otherwise), and witness the spectacle of having citizenship thrust upon you. ‘There has never been a better time to become an Australian citizen’ is marked on the package, which is signed by the Immigration Minister. Brown bags signify this entire process: we await the displays, the cameo aboriginal troupe intent on welcoming the naturalised citizen with a fire ceremony that misfires (or never fires), a lady with a speech impediment who deputises for the minister for Citizenship, and the various tiers of government expounding the virtues of civic responsibility. In short, the entire ceremony is a generous self­mocking; it is citizenship as comedy, a display of cultural symbols that are easily interchanged and shifted. The mocking of citizenship lies at the centre of Australia’s discourse on what it means to be an Australian citizen. It is parodic; it does not take itself seriously, which, some might argue, is its great strength.
    [Show full text]
  • Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law — Volume 18, 2015 Correspondents’ Reports
    YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW — VOLUME 18, 2015 CORRESPONDENTS’ REPORTS 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Contents Overview – United States Enforcement of International Humanitarian Law ............................ 1 Cases – United States Federal Court .......................................................................................... 3 Cases – United States Military Courts – Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF) ...... 4 Cases — United States Military Courts – United States Army ................................................. 4 Cases — United States Military Courts – United States Marine Corps .................................... 5 Issues — United States Department of Defense ........................................................................ 6 Issues — United States Army .................................................................................................... 8 Issues —United States Navy .................................................................................................... 11 Issues — United States Marine Corps ..................................................................................... 12 Overview – United States Detention Practice .......................................................................... 12 Detainee Challenges – United States District Court ................................................................ 13 US Military Commission Appeals ........................................................................................... 16 Court of Appeals for the
    [Show full text]
  • CTC Sentinel 4
    JULY 2011 . VOL 4 . ISSUE 7 COMBATING TERRORISM CENTER AT WEST POINT CTC SentineL OBJECTIVE . RELEVANT . RIGOROUS Contents The JRTN Movement and Iraq’s FEATURE ARTICLE 1 The JRTN Movement and Iraq’s Next Insurgency Next Insurgency By Michael Knights By Michael Knights REPORTS 6 Anwar al-`Awlaqi’s Disciples: Three Case Studies By Alexander Meleagrou-Hitchens 10 Will Al-Qa`ida and Al-Shabab Formally Merge? By Leah Farrall 12 The Somali Diaspora: A Key Counterterrorism Ally By Major Josh Richardson 15 David Hicks’ Memoir: A Deceptive Account of One Man’s Journey with Al-Qa`ida By Ken Ward 17 Hizb al-Tahrir: A New Threat to the Pakistan Army? By Arif Jamal 20 The Significance of Fazal Saeed’s Defection from the Pakistani Taliban By Daud Khattak JRTN leader Izzat Ibrahim al-Duri, seen here in 1999. - Photo by Salah Malkawi/Getty Images 22 Recent Highlights in Terrorist Activity he stabilization of iraq This article argues that one driver for 24 CTC Sentinel Staff & Contacts has become wedged on a the ongoing resilience, or even revival, plateau, beyond which further of Sunni militancy is the growing improvement will be a slow influence of the Jaysh Rijal al-Tariq al- Tprocess. According to incident metrics Naqshabandi (JRTN) movement, which compiled by Olive Group, the average has successfully tapped into Sunni Arab monthly number of insurgent attacks fear of Iraq’s Shi`a-led government and between January and June 2011 was the country’s Kurdish population, while 380.1 The incident count in January offering an authentic Iraqi alternate to About the CTC Sentinel was 376, indicating that incident levels al-Qa`ida in Iraq (AQI).
    [Show full text]
  • Pak-Us Strategic Partnership Amidst Conflicting Approaches Towards Militancy (2005-2015)
    PAK-US STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP AMIDST CONFLICTING APPROACHES TOWARDS MILITANCY (2005-2015) ASIF SALIM Ph.D (Scholar) DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF PESHAWAR SESSION: 2014-15 PAK-US STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP AMIDST CONFLICTING APPROACHES TOWARDS MILITANCY (2005-2015) Thesis submitted to the Department of Political Science, University of Peshawar, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE MARCH, 2018 i ABSTRACT International system based on anarchic theories and approaches in which power politics and statism are the basic components which play vital role when states conduct the relations with one another. The power of the state can be appraised through its ability to protect its national interests at any cost. States in relation with equal strength can easily protect their national interests but when the small and big state interests are clashed with each other, double standers and distrust take birth. Pakistan and the US relation is the best example of the realistic ideas in which it can be safely quoted „There is no permanent friendship and enmity. There are interests that decide the faith of friendship and enmity‟. After the partition of subcontinent civil and military leadership deviated from the golden principles of the founder (Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah) and joined the western bloc. America warmly welcomed Pakistan as the US needed partner in South and Southwest Asia and Asia Pacific to counter the spread of communistic ideologies in the region. From the day one the leader ship of Pakistan was not concerned with the communism but interested to acquire economic and military assistance from the US so as to keep balance with India.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and Militancy in Pakistan and Afghanistan
    Religion and Militancy in Pakistan and Afghanistan in Pakistan and Militancy Religion a report of the csis program on crisis, conflict, and cooperation Religion and Militancy in Pakistan and Afghanistan a literature review 1800 K Street, NW | Washington, DC 20006 Project Director Tel: (202) 887-0200 | Fax: (202) 775-3199 Robert D. Lamb E-mail: [email protected] | Web: www.csis.org Author Mufti Mariam Mufti June 2012 ISBN 978-0-89206-700-8 CSIS Ë|xHSKITCy067008zv*:+:!:+:! CHARTING our future a report of the csis program on crisis, conflict, and cooperation Religion and Militancy in Pakistan and Afghanistan a literature review Project Director Robert L. Lamb Author Mariam Mufti June 2012 CHARTING our future About CSIS—50th Anniversary Year For 50 years, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has developed practical solutions to the world’s greatest challenges. As we celebrate this milestone, CSIS scholars continue to provide strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to help decisionmakers chart a course toward a better world. CSIS is a bipartisan, nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. The Center’s 220 full-time staff and large network of affiliated scholars conduct research and analysis and de- velop policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Since 1962, CSIS has been dedicated to finding ways to sustain American prominence and prosperity as a force for good in the world. After 50 years, CSIS has become one of the world’s pre- eminent international policy institutions focused on defense and security; regional stability; and transnational challenges ranging from energy and climate to global development and economic integration.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Radicalization in the Uk: Index of Radicalization
    ISLAMIC RADICALIZATION IN THE UK: INDEX OF RADICALIZATION Anna Wojtowicz, (Research Assistant, ICT) Sumer 2012 ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to analyze the process of radicalization amongst British Muslims in the United Kingdom. It begins with a review of the Muslim population, demographics and community structure. Further presenting several internal and external indicators that influenced and led to radicalization of Muslim youth in Britain. The paper concludes that there is no one certainty for what causes radicalization amongst Muslims in United Kingdom. However, it is certain that Islamic radicalization and the emergence of a homegrown threat is a growing trend that jeopardizes the countries security, peace and stability. Radicalization in the United Kingdom is an existing concern that needs to be addressed and acted upon immediately. Misunderstanding or underestimating the threat may lead to further and long term consequences. * The views expressed in this publication are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Institute for Counter-Terrorism (ICT). 2 I. Introduction 4 II. Background 5 History of the Muslim Community in the United Kingdom 5 Population 7 Geographical Concentration of Muslims 8 Ethnic Background 10 Age Estimate 11 Occupation and Socio-Economic Conditions 11 Religious and Cultural Aspects 13 Multiculturalism 17 Islamophobia 20 Converts 21 Case Studies –London, Birmingham, Bradford, Leeds, Leicester 22 III. Organizations 28 Organizations within the United Kingdom 28 Mosques, Koranic Schools and Islamic Centers 34 Student Groups 40 Islamic Websites and TV 43 IV. Radicalization in Britain 43 Theoretical Background and Causes of Radicalization 43 Recruitment and Radicalization: Overlook 47 Radicalization Process 49 Forms of Financing 51 Radical Groups and Movements in the UK 53 Influential Leaders in the UK 60 Inspiration and Influence from Abroad 67 Sunni 67 Shia 70 3 V.
    [Show full text]
  • The Current Detainee Population of Guantánamo: an Empirical Study
    © Reuters/HO Old – Detainees at XRay Camp in Guantanamo. The Current Detainee Population of Guantánamo: An Empirical Study Benjamin Wittes and Zaahira Wyne with Erin Miller, Julia Pilcer, and Georgina Druce December 16, 2008 The Current Detainee Population of Guantánamo: An Empiricial Study Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction 3 The Public Record about Guantánamo 4 Demographic Overview 6 Government Allegations 9 Detainee Statements 13 Conclusion 22 Note on Sources and Methods 23 About the Authors 28 Endnotes 29 Appendix I: Detainees at Guantánamo 46 Appendix II: Detainees Not at Guantánamo 66 Appendix III: Sample Habeas Records 89 Sample 1 90 Sample 2 93 Sample 3 96 The Current Detainee Population of Guantánamo: An Empiricial Study EXECUTIVE SUMMARY he following report represents an effort both to document and to describe in as much detail as the public record will permit the current detainee population in American T military custody at the Guantánamo Bay Naval Station in Cuba. Since the military brought the first detainees to Guantánamo in January 2002, the Pentagon has consistently refused to comprehensively identify those it holds. While it has, at various times, released information about individuals who have been detained at Guantánamo, it has always maintained ambiguity about the population of the facility at any given moment, declining even to specify precisely the number of detainees held at the base. We have sought to identify the detainee population using a variety of records, mostly from habeas corpus litigation, and we have sorted the current population into subgroups using both the government’s allegations against detainees and detainee statements about their own affiliations and conduct.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Pashtunistan': the Challenge to Pakistan and Afghanistan
    Area: Security & Defence - ARI 37/2008 Date: 2/4/2008 ‘Pashtunistan’: The Challenge to Pakistan and Afghanistan Selig S. Harrison * Theme: The increasing co-operation between Pashtun nationalist and Islamist forces against Punjabi domination could lead to the break-up of Pakistan and Afghanistan and the emergence of a new national entity: an ‘Islamic Pashtunistan’. Summary: The alarming growth of al-Qaeda and the Taliban in the Pashtun tribal region of north-western Pakistan and southern Afghanistan is usually attributed to the popularity of their messianic brand of Islam and to covert help from Pakistani intelligence agencies. But another, more ominous, reason also explains their success: their symbiotic relationship with a simmering Pashtun separatist movement that could lead to the unification of the estimated 41 million Pashtuns on both sides of the border, the break-up of Pakistan and Afghanistan, and the emergence of a new national entity, an ‘Islamic Pashtunistan’. This ARI examines the Pashtun claim for an independent territory, the historical and political roots of the Pashtun identity, the implications for the NATO- or Pakistani-led military operations in the area, the increasing co-operation between Pashtun nationalist and Islamist forces against Punjabi domination and the reasons why the Pashtunistan movement, long dormant, is slowly coming to life. Analysis: The alarming growth of al-Qaeda and the Taliban in the Pashtun tribal region of north-western Pakistan and southern Afghanistan is usually attributed to the popularity of their messianic brand of Islam and to covert help from Pakistani intelligence agencies. But another, more ominous reason also explains their success: their symbiotic relationship with a simmering Pashtun separatist movement that could lead to the unification of the estimated 41 million Pashtuns on both sides of the border, the break-up of Pakistan and Afghanistan, and the emergence of a new national entity, ‘Pashtunistan,’ under radical Islamist leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • On 12 June 2013
    STATEMENT BY ASSISTANT CHIEF JOSEPH W. PFEIFER CHIEF OF COUNTERTERRORISM AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FIRE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK BEFORE THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY ’S SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE ON PROTECTING THE HOMELAND AGAINST MUMBAI -STYLE ATTACKS AND THE THREAT FROM LASHKAR -E-TAIBA 12 JUNE 2013 INTRODUCTION Good morning Chairman McCaul, Chairman King, Ranking Members Higgins, and distinguished members of the Subcommittee for Counterterrorism and Intelligence. My name is Joseph Pfeifer and I am the Chief of Counterterrorism for the New York City Fire Department (FDNY). Thank you for the opportunity to speak with you today about the FDNY’s concerns and initiatives related to the use of fire as a weapon by those who are determined to bring harm to the United States. The use of fire for criminal, gang, and terrorist activities, as well as targeting first responders, is not new. Over the past four decades the FDNY has faced hundreds of intentionally set fires that would often target firefighters. However, on March 25, 1990 the unthinkable happened. An arsonist with a plastic container of gasoline spread fuel on the exit stairs of the “Happy Land Night Club” in the Bronx, intentionally killing 87 people, foreshadowing even larger events to come. The attacks of September 11, 2001 are remembered as the first to employ airplanes as weapons of mass destruction, resulting in the loss of almost 3,000 people. However, it was the resultant fires, which brought down Towers 1 and 2 of the World Trade Center in the deadliest attack on American soil.
    [Show full text]