Tange, Hanne (2000) Writing the Nation: Four Inter-War Visions of Scotland. Phd Thesis. Copyright

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tange, Hanne (2000) Writing the Nation: Four Inter-War Visions of Scotland. Phd Thesis. Copyright Tange, Hanne (2000) Writing the nation: four inter-war visions of Scotland. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/5189/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] WRITING TBE NATION: FOUR INTER-WAR VISIONS OF SCOTLAND By Hanne Tange A thesis submitted to the University of Glasgow in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2000 Department, o fScottish Literature , University of Glasgow Q Hanne Tange Til Tange-klanen i medgangog modgang 3 Summary This thesisexamines the visions of Scotlandthat comeacross in the inter-warwritings of Hugh MacDiarmid,Neil Gunn,Lewis GrassicGibbon and Edwin Muir in relationto the ideasof the ScottishLiterary Renaissanceas a whole. The initial part, "Into the Renaissance",consists of a historical accountof Scottish political and cultural nationalismin the 1920sand 1930s,followed by an examinationof the ways in which the authorsassociated with the ScottishRenaissance participated in the constructionof Scotlandas an imaginedcommunity. Geography, history, religion, languageand literatureare identified asthe five predominantthemes in the inter-war tradition, on the basisof which the intellectualscreated an imageof the nation that could expresstheir twin philosophiesof nationalismand modernism. The secondpart, 'Tour visions of ScotlanV, is composedof closereadings of the work of Hugh MacDiarmid,Neil Gunn,Lewis GrassicGibbon and Edwin Muir in that order of appearance.The MacDiannid chapterbegins with a discussionof the poet's call for a ScottishRenaissance in the 1920sand 1930s.It is arguedthat MacDiarmidset out with a strongbelief in his own ability to awakenthe nation,but that he became increasinglydisappointed with the Scots' lack of responseto his programmetowards the end of the 1920s.This disillusionmentresulted in a changeof strategyin the 1930s when, on the one hand,he exchangedthe politics of the National Party for his personal ideologyof ScottishRepublicanism, while, on the other,he abandonedprevious attemptsto reform the Scottishnation in favour of an idealisedvision that was more compatiblewith his poetic aims "Ibe peripherymoves to the centre"focuses on the work of Neil Gunn.The two initial sectionsconsider how the novelist attemptedto rewrite Scottishgeography and history in the 1920sand 1930s.The fiction is comparedwith Gunn's non-fictional writings in order to demonstrateto what an extentthis revisionismwas motivatedby the author'spolitical nationalism.The third part discussesGunn's work of the late 1930s,in which he tried to balancehis personalideal of small-statenationalism against the internationalistphilosophies of communismand socialism.Hence Gunn remainedloyal to his nationalistbeliefs throughoutthe 1920sand 1930s,which makeshis vision of Scotlandthe most consistentof the four. Summary The chapteron Lewis GrassicGibbon begins with a discussionof the mannerin which the writer employsScottish geography, history andlanguage to constructhis imaginedcommunity of Kinraddie.The secondsection concentrates on the relationship betweenthe fiction of CloudHowe and the non-fictional"Condition of Scotland"genre that developedin the 1920sand 1930,whereas the third part considersthe implications of the author'sideological message. I concludethat Gibbon'sA ScotsQuair represents oneof the strongestimages of Scotlandthat emergedfrom the inter-warrevival, but also that it associatesthe nationwith thepasý which is to saythat it containslittle hopefor the future. Finally, "Wherethings miscarry" examines Edwin Muir's ambivalentrelationship with his homecountry. The chapterstarts with a brief accountof the writer's developmentin the 1920s,then moves into his criticism of the 1930s,which is more Scottishin orientation.It is arguedthat he originally sympathisedwith the ideaof a ScottishRenaissance when he first encounteredit in the early 1920s,but that he soon realisedthat Scotlandand the Scotsmight not live up to MacDiarmid'shigh expectations.The secondand third sectionsdiscuss how in Muir's writings of the 1930s the nation becamesynonymous with Calvinism,which againled the authorto conclude that Scotlandwas an artistic wasteland.Accordingly, Muir's work leavesa negative vision that may counterbalanceMacDiarmid's idealism. The concludingpart, "The dissociatedimagination? ", comparesthe four visionsof Hugh MacDiarmid,Neil Gunn,Lewis GrassicGibbon and Edwin Muir. It is demonstratedhow, on the onehand, the authors'use of geography,history, religion, languageand literaturein their writings increasethe visibility of Scotlandas an imaginedcommunity, whereas their lack of consensuson a numberof key issues,on the other,weakens the nationalistargument. On the basisof that, I claim that the legacyof the ScottishRenaissance within Scottishliterary tradition is the myths of continuity and dissociationwhich havebeen to the fore of the critical discoursein the twentieth century,but which mustbe deconstructedif one is gain a full understandingof the period. In consequence,I propose a cultural historical approachto the ScottishLiterary Renaissancewhich recognisesthe discursivenature of the literatureas well as the fact that we are essentiallydealing with a period of history. Tablc of contcnts: SUMMARY 3 ................................................................................................................................................ TABLEOF CONTENTS: 5 ................................................................................................ ............................... AwowLEDGEminm 6 ............................................................................................................................ AUMOR'S 7 DECLARATTON........................................................................................ ............................... INTRODUCTTON 8 ........................................................................................................................................ PART ONE: INTO THE RENAISSANCE.------ INTo RENAissANcE 16 THE ......................................................................................................................... 1919 16 on the edgeof catastrophe...................................................................................................... Enter "Hugh MDiarmid". Scottish in 1920s 1930s 21 nationalism the and ....................................... The Scotland 33 voiceof ....................................................................................................................... Beyond Renaissance 49 the ................................................................................................................... PART TWO: FOUR VISIONS OF SCOTLAND-- INTRODUCTORY 52 ...............................................; .................................................................................... ON SEEINGSCOTLAND HUGHM. 1919-43 54 WHOLE: ACDIAMID .............................................................. Calling ScottishReýaissance 1919-30 59 out the ................................................................................. "Lourd Hert 1930s 69 on my ". HughMacDiarmid's politics in the .................................................... Poet'sluck- Hugh MacMarmid's in 1930s 77 poetics the .................................................................... Hugh MacDiarmid in ScottishRenaissance 84 the ............................................................................... THE PEFjrHERY NEIL M. GUNN 192641 89 movEs To THEcENTRE: ......................................................... Too Neil Gunn's 1926-32 94 old and going under: space ..................................................................... TwoScottish histories 1933-41 103 ...................................................................................................... "The Macdonald day". Gunn's late 1930s 110 at the endof the - vision of the ..................................... Neil Gunnin ScottishRenaissance 117 the ........................................................................................... FROMScoTsHiRE MEARNs:LEWIS GRASSIC GMBON 1928-35 122 INTOTHE ............................................ Grassic Gibbon's 1930-32 127 art ofcommunity: ................................................................................ Between the Scotland Cloud Howe 136 old and a new: ........................................................................ Grey Granite: Nere tradition 143 and modernity meet ...................................................................... Lewis Grassic Gibbon in the Scottish Renaissance 151 ........................................................................ WHERE THINGSMISCARRY: EDWIN MUIR 191843 156 ................................................................................ In an age of transition: The 1918-28 161 growth of a critic ................................................................. Edwin Muir's Scottishiourney 1929-35 168 ........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • ROBERT BURNS and PASTORAL This Page Intentionally Left Blank Robert Burns and Pastoral
    ROBERT BURNS AND PASTORAL This page intentionally left blank Robert Burns and Pastoral Poetry and Improvement in Late Eighteenth-Century Scotland NIGEL LEASK 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX26DP Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York # Nigel Leask 2010 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2010 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose the same condition on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Data available Typeset by SPI Publisher Services, Pondicherry, India Printed in Great Britain on acid-free paper by MPG Books Group, Bodmin and King’s Lynn ISBN 978–0–19–957261–8 13579108642 In Memory of Joseph Macleod (1903–84), poet and broadcaster This page intentionally left blank Acknowledgements This book has been of long gestation.
    [Show full text]
  • Title: Stone of Destiny
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Stone of Destiny Citation for published version: Murray, J 2015, Stone of Destiny. in B Nowlan & Z Finch (eds), Directory of World Cinema: Scotland. 1st edn, Intellect Ltd., Bristol/Chicago, pp. 174-176. Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: Directory of World Cinema: Scotland Publisher Rights Statement: © Murray, J. (2015). Stone of Destiny. In B. Nowlan, & Z. Finch (Eds.), Directory of World Cinema: Scotland. (1st ed., pp. 174-176). Bristol/Chicago: Intellect Ltd . General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 23. Sep. 2021 Title: Stone of Destiny Country of Origin: Canada, UK Year: 2008 Language: English Production Companies: Infinity Features Entertainment, The Mob Film Company, Alliance Films, Téléfilm Canada, Scottish Screen National Lottery Fund, The Harold Greenberg Fund Filming Location: Arbroath, Glasgow, London, Vancouver Director: Charles Martin Smith Producers: Andrew Boswell, Alan Martin, Rob Merilees Screenwriters: Charles Martin Smith, Ian Hamilton Art Director: Andy Thomson Editor: Fredrik Thorsen Runtime: 96 minutes Cast (Starring): Charlie Cox, Kate Mara, Stephen McCole, Billy Boyd, Robert Carlyle Synopsis: Based on a true story, Stone of Destiny narrates the tale of a daring heist jointly fuelled by the audacity of young minds and the tenacity of old mindsets.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Irish and Scottish Studies Migrating Minds
    Journal of Irish and Scottish Studies Volume 5: Issue 1 Migrating Minds AHRC Centre for Irish and Scottish Studies, University of Aberdeen JOURNAL OF IRISH AND SCOTTISH STUDIES Volume 5, Issue 1 Autumn 2011 Migrating Minds Published by the AHRC Centre for Irish and Scottish Studies at the University of Aberdeen in association with The universities of the The Irish-Scottish Academic Initiative ISSN 1753-2396 Printed and bound in Great Britain by CPI Antony Rowe, Chippenham and Eastbourne Journal of Irish and Scottish Studies General Editor: Cairns Craig Issue Editor: Paul Shanks Associate Editor: Michael Brown Editorial Advisory Board: Fran Brearton, Queen’s University, Belfast Eleanor Bell, University of Strathclyde Ewen Cameron, University of Edinburgh Sean Connolly, Queen’s University, Belfast Patrick Crotty, University of Aberdeen David Dickson, Trinity College, Dublin T. M. Devine, University of Edinburgh David Dumville, University of Aberdeen Aaron Kelly, University of Edinburgh Edna Longley, Queen’s University, Belfast Peter Mackay, Queen’s University, Belfast Shane Alcobia-Murphy, University of Aberdeen Ian Campbell Ross, Trinity College, Dublin Graham Walker, Queen’s University, Belfast International Advisory Board: Don Akenson, Queen’s University, Kingston Tom Brooking, University of Otago Keith Dixon, Université Lumière Lyon 2 Marjorie Howes, Boston College H. Gustav Klaus, University of Rostock Peter Kuch, University of Otago Graeme Morton, University of Guelph Brad Patterson, Victoria University, Wellington Matthew Wickman, Brigham Young David Wilson, University of Toronto The Journal of Irish and Scottish Studies is a peer reviewed journal published twice yearly in autumn and spring by the AHRC Centre for Irish and Scottish Studies at the University of Aberdeen.
    [Show full text]
  • Former Fellows Biographical Index Part
    Former Fellows of The Royal Society of Edinburgh 1783 – 2002 Biographical Index Part Two ISBN 0 902198 84 X Published July 2006 © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 22-26 George Street, Edinburgh, EH2 2PQ BIOGRAPHICAL INDEX OF FORMER FELLOWS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH 1783 – 2002 PART II K-Z C D Waterston and A Macmillan Shearer This is a print-out of the biographical index of over 4000 former Fellows of the Royal Society of Edinburgh as held on the Society’s computer system in October 2005. It lists former Fellows from the foundation of the Society in 1783 to October 2002. Most are deceased Fellows up to and including the list given in the RSE Directory 2003 (Session 2002-3) but some former Fellows who left the Society by resignation or were removed from the roll are still living. HISTORY OF THE PROJECT Information on the Fellowship has been kept by the Society in many ways – unpublished sources include Council and Committee Minutes, Card Indices, and correspondence; published sources such as Transactions, Proceedings, Year Books, Billets, Candidates Lists, etc. All have been examined by the compilers, who have found the Minutes, particularly Committee Minutes, to be of variable quality, and it is to be regretted that the Society’s holdings of published billets and candidates lists are incomplete. The late Professor Neil Campbell prepared from these sources a loose-leaf list of some 1500 Ordinary Fellows elected during the Society’s first hundred years. He listed name and forenames, title where applicable and national honours, profession or discipline, position held, some information on membership of the other societies, dates of birth, election to the Society and death or resignation from the Society and reference to a printed biography.
    [Show full text]
  • Universiv Microfilms International 3Ü0 N
    INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed, you will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo­ graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in “sectioning” the material. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand comer cf a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For any illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and tipped into your xerographic copy.
    [Show full text]
  • Imagining Scotland
    Imagining Scotland National Self-Depiction in Sir Walter Scott's Waverley , Lewis Grassic Gibbon's Sunset Song , Irvine Welsh's Trainspotting and Alasdair Gray's Lanark Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der Philosophischen Fakultät IV (Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaften) der Universität Regensburg vorgelegt von Christian Kucznierz Mühlfeldstr. 12 93083 Obertraubling 2008 Regensburg 2009 Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Rainer Emig Zweitgutachter: PD Dr. Anne-Julia Zwierlein Acknowledgements In the six years it took to finish this study, I was working simultaneously on my professional career outside of the university. It was Prof. Dr. Rainer Emig's constant encouragement which helped me not to lose sight of the aim I was pursuing in all those years. I would like to thank him for giving me the chance to start my dissertation, for his support, his valuable advice and the fact that I could call on him at any time. Furthermore, I would like to thank PD Dr. Anne-Julia Zwierlein, who on rather short notice agreed to supervise my work, and whose ideas helped to give my thesis the necessary final touches. I would also like to thank my wife, Sandra, and my family, who have been patient enough to understand that my weekends, holidays and evenings after work were mostly busy – and that my mind much too often strayed from important issues. Without their support and understanding, this thesis would never have come into existence. Obertraubling, 2009 Table of Contents page 1. How does Scotland imagine itself? 5 2. Imagi-Nation: Literature and Self-Depiction 8 2.1. The Printed Word, Community and Identity 9 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell
    Copyrights sought (Albert) Basil (Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell) Filson Young (Alexander) Forbes Hendry (Alexander) Frederick Whyte (Alfred Hubert) Roy Fedden (Alfred) Alistair Cooke (Alfred) Guy Garrod (Alfred) James Hawkey (Archibald) Berkeley Milne (Archibald) David Stirling (Archibald) Havergal Downes-Shaw (Arthur) Berriedale Keith (Arthur) Beverley Baxter (Arthur) Cecil Tyrrell Beck (Arthur) Clive Morrison-Bell (Arthur) Hugh (Elsdale) Molson (Arthur) Mervyn Stockwood (Arthur) Paul Boissier, Harrow Heraldry Committee & Harrow School (Arthur) Trevor Dawson (Arwyn) Lynn Ungoed-Thomas (Basil Arthur) John Peto (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin & New Statesman (Borlasse Elward) Wyndham Childs (Cecil Frederick) Nevil Macready (Cecil George) Graham Hayman (Charles Edward) Howard Vincent (Charles Henry) Collins Baker (Charles) Alexander Harris (Charles) Cyril Clarke (Charles) Edgar Wood (Charles) Edward Troup (Charles) Frederick (Howard) Gough (Charles) Michael Duff (Charles) Philip Fothergill (Charles) Philip Fothergill, Liberal National Organisation, N-E Warwickshire Liberal Association & Rt Hon Charles Albert McCurdy (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett & World Review of Reviews (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Colin) Mark Patrick (Crwfurd) Wilfrid Griffin Eady (Cyril) Berkeley Ormerod (Cyril) Desmond Keeling (Cyril) George Toogood (Cyril) Kenneth Bird (David) Euan Wallace (Davies) Evan Bedford (Denis Duncan)
    [Show full text]
  • BUSINESS BULLETIN No. 276/2012 Monday 2 July 2012
    BUSINESS BULLETIN No. 276/2012 Monday 2 July 2012 ANNOUNCEMENT Royal Assent The Alcohol (Minimum Pricing) Scotland Act 2012 (asp 4) received Royal Assent on 29 June 2012. 1 Contents The sections which appear in today‘s Business Bulletin are in bold Section A: Today‘s Business - Meetings of Committees - Meeting of the Parliament Section B: Future Meetings of the Parliament Section C: Future Meetings of Committees Section D: Oral Questions - Questions selected for First Minister‘s Question Time - Questions selected for response by Ministers and junior Scottish Ministers at Question Time Section E: Written Questions – new questions for written answer Section F: Motions and Amendments Section G: Bills - New Bills introduced - New amendments to Bills - Members‘ Bills proposals Section H: New Documents – new documents laid before the Parliament and committee reports published Section I: Petitions – new public petitions Section J Progress of Legislation – progress of Bills and subordinate legislation 2 Business Bulletin: Monday 2 July 2012 Section B – Future Meetings of the Parliament Business Programme agreed by the Parliament on 20 June 2012 Tuesday 4 September 2012 2.00 pm Time for Reflection followed by Parliamentary Bureau Motions 2.05 pm Topical Questions followed by Scottish Government Business followed by Business Motions followed by Parliamentary Bureau Motions 5.00 pm Decision Time followed by Members‘ Business Wednesday 5 September 2012 2.00 pm Parliamentary Bureau Motions 2.00 pm Portfolio Questions Education and Lifelong Learning
    [Show full text]
  • For the Past 50 Years, Labour and Conservative
    "For the past 50 years, Labour and Conservative Governments have shared a common agenda - stopping Home Rulers and Scottish Nationalists from breaking up Britain and making Scotland independent. This programme will show you how both parties have resorted to spying and underhand tactics to discredit the SNP, its members and supporters. We will show you how official documents which supported independence were kept hidden. Politicians and civil servants tried to obstruct independence and keep the country united." This document is a transcript, with some screen captures for illustrative purposes, of the Gaelic television programme 'DIOMHAIR' which was produced by the independent company - Caledonia TV. The transcription was carried out by a team of volunteers who regard the programme's content, which relies heavily on information released under FOI rules, as being of considerable educational value. Especially for those with a new or renewed interest in Scottish politics and its recent history. While most of the inevitable differences in text production (font type and size, spacings used etc.) stemming from individual preferences of team members have been homogenised by post editing, there is still noticeable variation in the layout, size, quality and frequency of the screen captures used to illustrate the text. If your interest is sparked by the contents of this document, we advise that you may obtain the original DVD for a more complete experience. It is available from: Caledonia TV, 147 Bath Street, Glasgow, for £10 plus p&p Some Explanatory Notes When Derek Mackay, the programme presenter, speaks, his words are in regular text and are not contained within quotation marks.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Nationalism
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Masters Theses The Graduate School Summer 2012 Scottish nationalism: The symbols of Scottish distinctiveness and the 700 Year continuum of the Scots' desire for self determination Brian Duncan James Madison University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019 Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Duncan, Brian, "Scottish nationalism: The symbols of Scottish distinctiveness and the 700 Year continuum of the Scots' desire for self determination" (2012). Masters Theses. 192. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019/192 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the The Graduate School at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Scottish Nationalism: The Symbols of Scottish Distinctiveness and the 700 Year Continuum of the Scots’ Desire for Self Determination Brian Duncan A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts History August 2012 Table of Contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………………….…….iii Chapter 1, Introduction……………………………………………………………………1 Chapter 2, Theoretical Discussion of Nationalism………………………………………11 Chapter 3, Early Examples of Scottish Nationalism……………………………………..22 Chapter 4, Post-Medieval Examples of Scottish Nationalism…………………………...44 Chapter 5, Scottish Nationalism Masked Under Economic Prosperity and British Nationalism…...………………………………………………….………….…………...68 Chapter 6, Conclusion……………………………………………………………………81 ii Abstract With the modern events concerning nationalism in Scotland, it is worth asking how Scottish nationalism was formed. Many proponents of the leading Modernist theory of nationalism would suggest that nationalism could not have existed before the late eighteenth century, or without the rise of modern phenomena like industrialization and globalization.
    [Show full text]
  • From Social Democracy Back to No Ideology? - the Scottish National Party and Ideological Change in a Multi-Level Electoral Setting
    From Social Democracy back to No Ideology? - The Scottish National Party and Ideological Change in a Multi-level Electoral Setting Peter Lynch Accepted for publication in Regional & Federal Studies published by Taylor and Francis Introduction Nationalist and regionalist parties have often been characterised as ideologically heterogeneous (Hix and Lord, 1997; De Winter and Türsan, 1998). This situation makes regionalist parties difficult to classify in conventional left-right terms though viewing these parties as an ideological family is to misunderstand their role and significance. Ideological profile can be understood as a secondary characteristic of regionalist parties, as opposed to their primary characteristic of support for self- government – the core business of autonomy (De Winter, 1998, 208-9): which in itself contains a variety of constitutional options to reorganise the territorial distribution of power within a state (Rokkan and Urwin, 1983). However, though ideological positioning may be a secondary characteristic, most regionalist parties have adopted an ideology – in the SNP’s case social democracy. As will be explained below, the reasons for adopting an ideology in itself, in addition to a particular ideology, are complex. For the SNP, the ideological position of elites, the policy preferences of the party’s membership and the adoption of an electoral strategy to challenge a dominant political party in the region (Labour) were all influential. The adoption of an ideological position was not always uncontroversial but became easier due to party system change (the electoral decline of the Conservatives in Scotland from the 1960s), as the SNP came to focus much of its attention on Labour as its primary competitor.
    [Show full text]
  • National Identity Construction During the Referendum Campaign for Scottish Independence 2014
    National Identity Construction During the Referendum campaign for Scottish Independence 2014. A Critical Discourse Analysis Asha Manikiza 861123T369 International migration and Ethnic Relations One-year Master Thesis (IM627L) Spring semester 2018 Supervisor: Anne Sofie Roald Word Count: 15,888 Abstract Scotland is one of the four nations that make up the plurinational UK. It is as of yet the only one of these nations to have a referendum on its independence. Using Critical Discourse Analysis of 20 newspaper articles at different times in the referendum campaign, I have seen how Scottish national identity has been constructed. The study reveals that far from constructing a national identity based on culture, symbols or historic myth, the Scots base their identity largely on a differing approach to economic policy than the English. Keywords: Scotland, Critical Discourse Analysis, Newspapers, National identity construction, Referendum Contents Page Abstract Table of Contents Abbreviations 1. Introduction 1 1.2 Aim and Research question 1 1.3 Delimitations 2 1.4 Research Relevance 2 1.5 Terminalogical Explannations 2 1.6 Thesis Structure 3 2. Contextual Background 4 2.1 The Scottish Question: A historical Overview 4 2.2 Why Focus on Scotland? 4 2.3 Why the Increase In Scottish Nationalism? 5 2.4 Why Focus on the Referendum Campaign for Scottish Independence 2014? 5 2.5 Role of the Newspapers in national identity construction 6 3. Previous Research 7 3.1 The Shifting Concept of a Scottish National Identity and Britishness 7 3.2 The Crisis of Union and the move towards Independence 8 4. Theoretical Framework 10 4.1 Banal Nationalism 10 4.2 Imagined Communities 11 5.
    [Show full text]