Springtail Diversity in South Africa
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Why Are There So Many Exotic Springtails in Australia? a Review
90 (3) · December 2018 pp. 141–156 Why are there so many exotic Springtails in Australia? A review. Penelope Greenslade1, 2 1 Environmental Management, School of School of Health and Life Sciences, Federation University, Ballarat, Victoria 3353, Australia 2 Department of Biology, Australian National University, GPO Box, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia E-mail: [email protected] Received 17 October 2018 | Accepted 23 November 2018 Published online at www.soil-organisms.de 1 December 2018 | Printed version 15 December 2018 DOI 10.25674/y9tz-1d49 Abstract Native invertebrate assemblages in Australia are adversely impacted by invasive exotic plants because they are replaced by exotic, invasive invertebrates. The reasons have remained obscure. The different physical, chemical and biotic characteristics of the novel habitat seem to present hostile conditions for native species. This results in empty niches. It seems the different ecologies of exotic invertebrate species may be better adapted to colonise these novel empty niches than native invertebrates. Native faunas of other southern continents that possess a highly endemic fauna, such as South America, South Africa and New Zealand, may have suffered the same impacts from exotic species but insufficient survey data and unreliable and old taxonomy makes this uncertain. Here I attempt to discover what particular characteristics of these novel habitats are hostile to native invertebrates. I chose the Collembola as a target taxon. They are a suitable group because the Australian collembolan fauna consists of a high percentage of endemic taxa, but also exotic, non-native, species. Most exotic Collembola species in Australia appear to have originated from Europe, where they occur at low densities (Fjellberg 1997, 2007). -
With Special Emphasis on the Equatorial Oceanic Islands
insects Article Synthesis of the Brazilian Poduromorpha (Collembola: Hexapoda) with Special Emphasis on the Equatorial Oceanic Islands Estevam C. A. de Lima 1,2,* , Maria Cleide de Mendonça 1, Gabriel Costa Queiroz 1 , Tatiana Cristina da Silveira 1 and Douglas Zeppelini 2 1 Laboratório de Apterygotologia, Departamento de Entomologia, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20940-040, Brazil; [email protected] (M.C.d.M.); [email protected] (G.C.Q.); [email protected] (T.C.d.S.) 2 Laboratório de Sistemática de Collembola e Conservação—Coleção de Referência de Fauna de Solo—CCBSA—Universidade Estadual da Paraíba Campus V, João Pessoa 58070-450, Brazil; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Endemic Collembola species are bioindicators of environmental quality since native species abundance is particularly sensitive to environmental disturbances. Oceanic island biota generally present high percentages of endemic species, and the vulnerability of these species is higher than those of the continents. The objective of this work was to carry out a survey of the Collembola species of the order Poduromorpha in the Brazilian oceanic islands and synthesize a distribution list of this order for Brazil. Our results reveal four new species of Collembola Poduromorpha for Brazilian oceanic islands that may be useful for the conservation strategies of these island regions and a contributor to the knowledge of the order in Brazil. Citation: de Lima, E.C.A.; de Mendonça, M.C.; Queiroz, G.C.; da Silveira, T.C.; Abstract: We present new species and records of Poduromorpha for the Brazilian oceanic islands and Zeppelini, D. -
Por Que Devemos Nos Importar Com Os Colêmbolos Edáficos?
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Biblioteca Digital de Periódicos da UFPR (Universidade Federal do Paraná) REVISTA SCIENTIA AGRARIA Versão On-line ISSN 1983-2443 Versão Impressa ISSN 1519-1125 SA vol. 17 n°. 2 Curitiba abril/maio. 2016 p. 21-40 POR QUE DEVEMOS NOS IMPORTAR COM OS COLÊMBOLOS EDÁFICOS? Why should we care about edaphic springtails? Luís Carlos Iuñes Oliveira Filho¹*, Dilmar Baretta² 1. Professor do curso de Agronomia da Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (Unoesc), Campus Xanxerê - SC, E-mail: [email protected] (*autor para correspondência). 2. Professor do curso de Zootecnia da Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC Oeste), Campus Chapecó - SC. Bolsista em Produtividade Científica CNPq. E-mail: [email protected] Artigo enviado em 26/08/2016, aceito em 03/10/2016 e publicado em 20/12/2016. RESUMO: Este trabalho de revisão tem como objetivo apresentar a importância dos colêmbolos edáficos, com destaque para aspectos agronômicos e ecológicos. São abordadas as características gerais, densidade e distribuição dos colêmbolos, bem como a relação dos colêmbolos com práticas agrícolas, com fungos, com ciclagem de nutrientes e fertilidade do solo. São também reportados trabalhos da literatura, demonstrando a importância desses organismos aos serviços do ecossistema, como ciclagem de nutrientes, melhoria na fertilidade, agregação do solo, controle de fungos e indicadores da qualidade do solo. Pretende-se com este trabalho demonstrar o importante papel desempenhado pelos colêmbolos e expandir o campo de pesquisa com esses organismos, aumentando o conhecimento dos importantes processos mediados por eles e a interface entre a Ecologia do Solo e Ciência do Solo. -
ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000). -
Succession of Nematodes During Composting Processess and Their Potential As Indicators of Compost Maturity
Succession of nematodes during composting processess and their potential as indicators of compost maturity Hanne Steel Promoters: Prof. dr. Wim Bert (UGent) Prof. dr. Tom Moens (UGent) Thesis submitted to obtain the degree of doctor in Sciences, Biology Proefschrift voorgelegd tot het bekomen van de graad van doctor in de Wetenschappen, Biologie Dit werk werd mogelijk gemaakt door een beurs van het Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek- Vlaanderen (FWO) This work was supported by a grant of the Foundation for Scientific Research, Flanders (FWO) 3 Reading Committee: Prof. dr. Deborah Neher (University of Vermont, USA) Dr. Thomaé Kakouli-Duarte (Institute of Technology Carlow, Ireland) Prof. dr. Magda Vincx (Ghent University, Belgium) Dr. Eduardo de la Peña (Ghent University, Belgium) Examination Committee: Prof. dr. Koen Sabbe (chairman, Ghent University, Belgium) Prof. dr. Wim Bert (secretary, promotor, Ghent University, Belgium) Prof. dr. Tom Moens (promotor, Ghent University, Belgium) Prof. dr. Deborah Neher (University of Vermont, USA) Dr. Thomaé Kakouli-Duarte (Institute of Technology Carlow, Ireland) Prof. dr. Magda Vincx (Ghent University, Belgium) Prof. dr. Wilfrida Decraemer (Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Belgium) Dr. Eduardo de la Peña (Ghent University, Belgium) Dr. Ir. Bart Vandecasteele (Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research, Belgium) 5 Acknowledgments Eindelijk is het zover! Ik mag mijn dankwoord schrijven, iets waar ik stiekem al heel lang naar uitkijk en dat alleen maar kan betekenen dat mijn doctoraat bijna klaar is. JOEPIE! De voorbije 5 jaar waren zonder twijfel leuk, leerrijk en ontzettend boeiend. Maar… jawel doctoreren is ook een project van lange adem, met vallen en opstaan, met zin en tegenzin, met geluk en tegenslag, met fantastische hoogtes maar soms ook laagtes….Nu ik er zo over nadenk en om in een vertrouwd thema te blijven: doctoreren verschilt eigenlijk niet zo gek veel van een composteringsproces, dat bij voorkeur trouwens ook veel adem (zuurstof) ter beschikking heeft. -
Studies of Soil Fauna with Special Reference to the Collembola
- I I I STUDIES OF SOIL FAUNA WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE I TO THE COLLEMBOLA Peter F. Bellinger THE CONNECTICUT AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION NEW HAVEN I BULLETIN 583, JANUARY, 1954 I I STUDIES OF SOIL FAUNA WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE COLLEMBOLA Peter F. Bellinger THE CONNECTICUT AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION NEW HAVEN BULLETIN 583, JANUARY, 1954 CONTENTS Page ........................................ INTRODUCTION ........................................ 5 HABITA'TS STUDIED ...................... ...... THE FAUNA ......................... ..... ................................................ 14 Key to the Collembola .............................................................. 16 Other Arthropods .................... ....... ..................................... 27 ANALYSIS .............................................................................................. Differences and Similarities between Areas ............................. Methods of Analysis .............................. ........................... Differences in Species Occurrence ................... .... Characterization of the Areas .................................. Causes of Population Differences ..................................... Vertical Distribution .................................................................... Seasonal Variation ....................................................................... SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 63 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..................................................................... -
Comparison of Dung and Soil Fauna from Pastures Treated with and Without Ivermectin As an Example of the Effects of a Veterinary Pharmaceutical Final Report
TEXTE 54 /2017 Comparison of dung and soil fauna from pastures treated with and without ivermectin as an example of the effects of a veterinary pharmaceutical Final Report TEXTE 54/2017 Environmental Research of the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety Project No. (FKZ) 3710 63 412 Report No. (UBA-FB) 002155/E Comparison of dung and soil fauna from pastures treated with and without ivermectin as an example of the effects of a veterinary pharmaceutical by Dr. Jörg Römbke (Co-ordination), Dipl.-Ing. Adam Scheffczyk ECT Oekotoxikologie GmbH, Flörsheim, Germany Prof. Jean-Pierre Lumaret, Thomas Tixier University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France Dr. Wolf Blanckenhorn Zoologisches Museum, University of Zurich-Irchel, Zurich, Switzerland Dr. Joost Lahr Alterra, Wageningen, The Netherlands Dr. Kevin Floate Lethbridge Research Center, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4P4, Canada On behalf of the German Environment Agency Imprint Publisher: Umweltbundesamt Wörlitzer Platz 1 06844 Dessau-Roßlau Tel: +49 340-2103-0 Fax: +49 340-2103-2285 [email protected] Internet: www.umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt Study performed by: ECT Oekotoxikologie GmbH Böttgerstraße 2 – 14 65439 Flörsheim, Germany University of Montpellier 163 rue Auguste Broussonnet 34090 Montpellier, France Zoologisches Museum, University of Zurich-Irchel, KarlSchmidt-Straße 4 80006 Zurich, Switzerland Alterra Droevendaalsesteeg 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands Lethbridge Research Center 5403 1 Ave S Lethbridge, AB T1J 4P4, Canada Study completed in: December 2013 Edited by: Section IV 2.2 Pharmaceuticals, Washing and Cleaning Agents Dr. Nicole Adler Publication as pdf: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen ISSN 1862-4804 Dessau-Roßlau, June 2017 The project underlying this report was financed by the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear safety under project number FKZ 3710 63 412. -
Flooding in a Grassland Diversity Experiment:Response of Microorganisms, Microarthropods and Predator
Flooding in a grassland diversity experiment: response of microorganisms, microarthropods and predator – prey interactions Dissertation zur Erlangung des mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorgrades "Doctor rerum naturalium" der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen im Promotionsprogramm Biologie der Georg-August University School of Science (GAUSS) vorgelegt von Diplom-Biologin Odette González Macé aus Tres Cantos, Spain Göttingen, März 2018 Betreuungsausschuss Stefan Scheu and Mark Maraun, J.F. Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology; Göttingen University Mitglieder der Prüfungskommission Referent: Stefan Scheu Korreferent: Mark Maraun Weitere Mitglieder der Prüfungskommission: Marko Rohlfs, Population and Evolutionary Ecology, Bremen University Christoph Bleidorn, Animal Evolution and Biodiversity, Göttingen University Klaus Hövemeyer, Zoology and Anthropology; Göttingen University Nico Eisenhauer, Experimental Interaction Ecology, Leipzig University Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 4. May. 2018 To forget how to dig the earth and to tend the soil is to forget ourselves Mahatma Gandhi Table of Contents SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 1 ............................................................................................................................. 3 GENERAL INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 4 ABOVEGROUND‐BELOWGROUND FOOD -
This Thesis Is Dedicated to the Memory of My Father Who Passed Away Midway Through Its Completion and Has Been Missed Every Day Since
THE FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY OF EASTERN RÛENS SHALE RENOSTERVELD Town Cape of OLIVER S. COWAN UniversityTHESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY, JUNE 2019 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL & GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN The copyright of this thesis vests in theTown author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only.Cape Published by the Universityof of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University THIS THESIS IS DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF MY FATHER WHO PASSED AWAY MIDWAY THROUGH ITS COMPLETION AND HAS BEEN MISSED EVERY DAY SINCE. WILLIAM DOUGLAS COWAN 1952-2017 “It seems to me that the natural world is the greatest source of excitement; the greatest source of visual beauty; the greatest source of intellectual interest. It is the greatest source of so much in life that makes life worth living.” - David Attenborough “I cannot separate the aesthetic pleasure of seeing a butterfly and the scientific pleasure of knowing what it is.” ― Vladimir Nabokov i DECLARATION THIS THESIS COMPRISES ORIGINAL RESEARCH UNDERTAKEN BY MYSELF, OLIVER COWAN, AND HAS NOT PREVIOUSLY BEEN SUBMITTED FOR A DEGREE OR DIPLOMA AT ANY UNIVERSITY OR INSTITUTION. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, THIS THESIS CONTAINS NO MATERIAL PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED OR WRITTEN BY ANOTHER PERSON EXCEPT WHERE DUE REFERENCE IS MADE IN THE THESIS ITSELF. THE INTRODUCTION SECTION OF THIS THESIS DETAILS THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF FELLOW AUTHORS TO THE FOUR DATA CHAPTERS ACCEPTED, OR UNDER REVIEW, FOR PUBLICATION. -
The Geographical Distribution of Neotropical and Antarctic Collembola
Pacific Insects Monograph 25: 99-118 20 March 1971 THE GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF NEOTROPICAL AND ANTARCTIC COLLEMBOLA By E. H. Rapoport1 Abstract: Observations are made on (i) geographical gradients in the proportions of dark and pale species, (ii) the present knowledge of the collembolan faunas in the different regions, (iii) the splitting and lumping criteria, (iv) specific and generic endemism, (v) "paleantarctic" lines, and (vi) the relationships be tween the Neotropical Region and other regions of the world. Springtails: an example of ancient distribution Collembola is the most abundant—in number of individuals—and the best dispersed group of insects. Its biogeography, however, is poorly known. Handschin (1926, 1927) and Salmon (1949, 1951) published short papers on the subject, and other brief observations were made (Bodvarsson 1957, 1966; Carpenter 1916; Folsom 1901; Hammer 1953a, 1953b; Massoud 1967; Mills 1939; Schott 1893; Skorikow 1900; Uchida 1954; Womersley 1939). As occurs with the majority of invertebrate taxa, the knowledge we have on the collembolan fauna of the world is far from being complete and therefore the conclusions presented here are rather tentative. The order Collembola is very primitive. The most ancient fossil record of insects, i.e., Rhyniella praecursor from the middle Devonian belongs to this group. Unfortunately, between this finding and that of the Baltic amber, or Tertiary, there is a hiatus which does not permit any clear idea of the possible evolution and migration of these animals. Between the above two findings we have only Protentomobrya walkeri, from the Cretaceous of Cedar Lake (Manitoba) which, by itself, constitutes a separate family—Protentomobryidae (Folsom 1937; Delamare & Massoud 1968). -
Indirect Effects of Habitat Disturbance on Invasion
Indirect effects of habitat disturbance on invasion: nutritious litter from a grazing resistant plant favors alien over native Collembola Hans Petter Leinaas1, Jan Bengtsson2, Charlene Janion-Scheepers3 & Steven L. Chown3,4 1Department of Bioscience, University of Oslo, PO Box 1066, 0136 Oslo, Norway 2Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Box 7044, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden 3School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia 4Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, 7602 Matieland, South Africa Keywords Abstract Facilitation, nonadditive effects, renosterveld, resource patchiness, South Africa. Biological invasions are major threats to biodiversity, with impacts that may be compounded by other forms of environmental change. Observations of high Correspondence density of the invasive springtail (Collembola), Hypogastrura manubrialis in Hans Petter Leinaas, Department of heavily grazed renosterveld vegetation in the Western Cape, South Africa, raised Bioscience, University of Oslo, PO Box 1066, the question of whether the invasion was favored by changes in plant litter 0136 Oslo, Norway. quality associated with habitat disturbance in this vegetation type. To examine Tel: + 4722855276 Fax: + 4722854726 the likely mechanisms underlying the high abundance of H. manubrialis, cages E-mail: [email protected] with three types of naturally occurring litter with different nutrient content were placed out in the area and collected after different periods of time. Hypo- Funding Information gastrura manubrialis was mainly found in the nutrient-rich litter of the yellow- The study was funded by SA-Norway Grant bush (Galenia africana), which responds positively to disturbance in the form 180349 to S.L.