Indirect Effects of Habitat Disturbance on Invasion
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Why Are There So Many Exotic Springtails in Australia? a Review
90 (3) · December 2018 pp. 141–156 Why are there so many exotic Springtails in Australia? A review. Penelope Greenslade1, 2 1 Environmental Management, School of School of Health and Life Sciences, Federation University, Ballarat, Victoria 3353, Australia 2 Department of Biology, Australian National University, GPO Box, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia E-mail: [email protected] Received 17 October 2018 | Accepted 23 November 2018 Published online at www.soil-organisms.de 1 December 2018 | Printed version 15 December 2018 DOI 10.25674/y9tz-1d49 Abstract Native invertebrate assemblages in Australia are adversely impacted by invasive exotic plants because they are replaced by exotic, invasive invertebrates. The reasons have remained obscure. The different physical, chemical and biotic characteristics of the novel habitat seem to present hostile conditions for native species. This results in empty niches. It seems the different ecologies of exotic invertebrate species may be better adapted to colonise these novel empty niches than native invertebrates. Native faunas of other southern continents that possess a highly endemic fauna, such as South America, South Africa and New Zealand, may have suffered the same impacts from exotic species but insufficient survey data and unreliable and old taxonomy makes this uncertain. Here I attempt to discover what particular characteristics of these novel habitats are hostile to native invertebrates. I chose the Collembola as a target taxon. They are a suitable group because the Australian collembolan fauna consists of a high percentage of endemic taxa, but also exotic, non-native, species. Most exotic Collembola species in Australia appear to have originated from Europe, where they occur at low densities (Fjellberg 1997, 2007). -
With Special Emphasis on the Equatorial Oceanic Islands
insects Article Synthesis of the Brazilian Poduromorpha (Collembola: Hexapoda) with Special Emphasis on the Equatorial Oceanic Islands Estevam C. A. de Lima 1,2,* , Maria Cleide de Mendonça 1, Gabriel Costa Queiroz 1 , Tatiana Cristina da Silveira 1 and Douglas Zeppelini 2 1 Laboratório de Apterygotologia, Departamento de Entomologia, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20940-040, Brazil; [email protected] (M.C.d.M.); [email protected] (G.C.Q.); [email protected] (T.C.d.S.) 2 Laboratório de Sistemática de Collembola e Conservação—Coleção de Referência de Fauna de Solo—CCBSA—Universidade Estadual da Paraíba Campus V, João Pessoa 58070-450, Brazil; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Endemic Collembola species are bioindicators of environmental quality since native species abundance is particularly sensitive to environmental disturbances. Oceanic island biota generally present high percentages of endemic species, and the vulnerability of these species is higher than those of the continents. The objective of this work was to carry out a survey of the Collembola species of the order Poduromorpha in the Brazilian oceanic islands and synthesize a distribution list of this order for Brazil. Our results reveal four new species of Collembola Poduromorpha for Brazilian oceanic islands that may be useful for the conservation strategies of these island regions and a contributor to the knowledge of the order in Brazil. Citation: de Lima, E.C.A.; de Mendonça, M.C.; Queiroz, G.C.; da Silveira, T.C.; Abstract: We present new species and records of Poduromorpha for the Brazilian oceanic islands and Zeppelini, D. -
Por Que Devemos Nos Importar Com Os Colêmbolos Edáficos?
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Biblioteca Digital de Periódicos da UFPR (Universidade Federal do Paraná) REVISTA SCIENTIA AGRARIA Versão On-line ISSN 1983-2443 Versão Impressa ISSN 1519-1125 SA vol. 17 n°. 2 Curitiba abril/maio. 2016 p. 21-40 POR QUE DEVEMOS NOS IMPORTAR COM OS COLÊMBOLOS EDÁFICOS? Why should we care about edaphic springtails? Luís Carlos Iuñes Oliveira Filho¹*, Dilmar Baretta² 1. Professor do curso de Agronomia da Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (Unoesc), Campus Xanxerê - SC, E-mail: [email protected] (*autor para correspondência). 2. Professor do curso de Zootecnia da Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC Oeste), Campus Chapecó - SC. Bolsista em Produtividade Científica CNPq. E-mail: [email protected] Artigo enviado em 26/08/2016, aceito em 03/10/2016 e publicado em 20/12/2016. RESUMO: Este trabalho de revisão tem como objetivo apresentar a importância dos colêmbolos edáficos, com destaque para aspectos agronômicos e ecológicos. São abordadas as características gerais, densidade e distribuição dos colêmbolos, bem como a relação dos colêmbolos com práticas agrícolas, com fungos, com ciclagem de nutrientes e fertilidade do solo. São também reportados trabalhos da literatura, demonstrando a importância desses organismos aos serviços do ecossistema, como ciclagem de nutrientes, melhoria na fertilidade, agregação do solo, controle de fungos e indicadores da qualidade do solo. Pretende-se com este trabalho demonstrar o importante papel desempenhado pelos colêmbolos e expandir o campo de pesquisa com esses organismos, aumentando o conhecimento dos importantes processos mediados por eles e a interface entre a Ecologia do Solo e Ciência do Solo. -
ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000). -
Scale Distribution of Springtails (Collembola) 1, 2 1 3 LINA A
Age and level of self-organization affect the small-scale distribution of springtails (Collembola) 1, 2 1 3 LINA A. WIDENFALK , HANS PETTER LEINAAS, JAN BENGTSSON, AND TONE BIRKEMOE 1Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7044, Uppsala, SE-75007 Sweden 2Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1066, Blindern, Oslo, N-0316 Norway 3Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, As, NO 1432 Norway Citation: Widenfalk, L. A., H. P. Leinaas, J. Bengtsson, and T. Birkemoe. 2018. Age and level of self-organization affect the small-scale distribution of springtails (Collembola). Ecosphere 9(1):e02058. 10.1002/ecs2.2058 Abstract. In studies of community assembly, species are often assumed to have similar spatial distribu- tions and responses to the environment regardless of age or size. Under this assumption, it is possible to use species and species-level traits in community composition studies. Here, we test this assumption for two species of soil-living arthropods (springtails: Collembola) with direct development but assumed differ- ences in self-organizing behavior. We expected that the species with more pronounced social interactions (Hypogastrura tullbergi) should be less influenced by environmental factors and species interactions across all age classes, than Folsomia quadrioculata that is not known to exhibit social behavior. We used variance partitioning to examine the relative contributions of soil variables, vegetation composition, and other Collembola, vs. spatial variables (as a proxy for intraspecific interactions, i.e., self-organization), on the distribution of the two species and three of their age classes. -
Impact of Climatic Factors and Soil Quality on the Abundance And
Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2018; 6(1): 1119-1125 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 Impact of climatic factors and soil quality on JEZS 2018; 6(1): 1119-1125 © 2018 JEZS the abundance and population density of Received: 16-11-2017 Accepted: 21-12-2017 Collembola in the Rajshahi University Md. Shahinur Islam Campus, Bangladesh Institute of Food and Radiation Biology, Atomic Energy Research Establishment, G.P.O. Box-3787, Dhaka-1000, Md. Shahinur Islam, Mosharrof Hossain, M Hossain and M Yasmin Bangladesh Abstract Mosharrof Hossain The present study was conducted to know the impact of abiotic factors on the abundance and density of Department of Zoology, the collembolan population in the Rajshahi University Campus from March 2012 to February 2013. A total University of Rajshahi, of 3749 individuals of Collembola were collected and they were identified into three families and five Rajshahi-6205, Bangladesh species and three genera, viz; Entomobyra albocincta, Dicranocentroides indicus, Seira indica, M Hossain Lepidocyrtus lignorum, Lepidocyrtus sp (Entomobryidae), Salina sp. & Salina tricolor (Paronellidae), and Institute of Food and Radiation Tomocerus sp (Tomoceridae). Five different habitats; Open grassland, Shady grassland, Crop field margin, Biology, Atomic Energy Roadside vegetation and Pondside vegetation were selected for the collection of Collembola. The Research Establishment, temperature was positively correlated with abundance and density of Collembolan population (r = 0.622, G.P.O. Box-3787, Dhaka-1000, P<0.05) and where relative humidity (r = -0.114, P>0.05) and rainfall (r = - 0.06, P>0.05) was negatively Bangladesh correlated. The abundance of soil Collembola population were indicated strong positive correlation with Organic materials (r = 0.618, P>0.05), Nitrogen (r = 0.607, P>0.05), Phosphorus (r = 0.927, P<0.05), M Yasmin Potassium (r = 0.824, P<0.1), Sulfur (r = 0.663, P>0.05) and very week negative correlation with Zinc (r Institute of Food and Radiation = -0.383, P>0.05) and PH (r = -0.301, P>0.05) respectively. -
Succession of Nematodes During Composting Processess and Their Potential As Indicators of Compost Maturity
Succession of nematodes during composting processess and their potential as indicators of compost maturity Hanne Steel Promoters: Prof. dr. Wim Bert (UGent) Prof. dr. Tom Moens (UGent) Thesis submitted to obtain the degree of doctor in Sciences, Biology Proefschrift voorgelegd tot het bekomen van de graad van doctor in de Wetenschappen, Biologie Dit werk werd mogelijk gemaakt door een beurs van het Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek- Vlaanderen (FWO) This work was supported by a grant of the Foundation for Scientific Research, Flanders (FWO) 3 Reading Committee: Prof. dr. Deborah Neher (University of Vermont, USA) Dr. Thomaé Kakouli-Duarte (Institute of Technology Carlow, Ireland) Prof. dr. Magda Vincx (Ghent University, Belgium) Dr. Eduardo de la Peña (Ghent University, Belgium) Examination Committee: Prof. dr. Koen Sabbe (chairman, Ghent University, Belgium) Prof. dr. Wim Bert (secretary, promotor, Ghent University, Belgium) Prof. dr. Tom Moens (promotor, Ghent University, Belgium) Prof. dr. Deborah Neher (University of Vermont, USA) Dr. Thomaé Kakouli-Duarte (Institute of Technology Carlow, Ireland) Prof. dr. Magda Vincx (Ghent University, Belgium) Prof. dr. Wilfrida Decraemer (Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Belgium) Dr. Eduardo de la Peña (Ghent University, Belgium) Dr. Ir. Bart Vandecasteele (Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research, Belgium) 5 Acknowledgments Eindelijk is het zover! Ik mag mijn dankwoord schrijven, iets waar ik stiekem al heel lang naar uitkijk en dat alleen maar kan betekenen dat mijn doctoraat bijna klaar is. JOEPIE! De voorbije 5 jaar waren zonder twijfel leuk, leerrijk en ontzettend boeiend. Maar… jawel doctoreren is ook een project van lange adem, met vallen en opstaan, met zin en tegenzin, met geluk en tegenslag, met fantastische hoogtes maar soms ook laagtes….Nu ik er zo over nadenk en om in een vertrouwd thema te blijven: doctoreren verschilt eigenlijk niet zo gek veel van een composteringsproces, dat bij voorkeur trouwens ook veel adem (zuurstof) ter beschikking heeft. -
Chemical Communication in Springtails
Chemical communication in springtails: a review of facts and perspectives Sandrine Salmon, Sylvie Rebuffat, Soizic Prado, Michel Sablier, Cyrille d’Haese, Jian-Sheng Sun, Jean-François Ponge To cite this version: Sandrine Salmon, Sylvie Rebuffat, Soizic Prado, Michel Sablier, Cyrille d’Haese, et al.. Chemical communication in springtails: a review of facts and perspectives. Biology and Fertility of Soils, Springer Verlag, 2019, 55 (5), pp.425-438. 10.1007/s00374-019-01365-8. hal-02152310v2 HAL Id: hal-02152310 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02152310v2 Submitted on 28 Apr 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Public Domain 1 1 Chemical communication in springtails: a review of facts and perspectives 2 Sandrine Salmon1, Sylvie Rebuffat2, Soizic Prado2, Michel Sablier3, Cyrille D’Haese1, Jian-Sheng 3 Sun4, Jean-François Ponge1 4 1Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Département Adaptations du Vivant, UMR 7179 MECADEV, 5 4 avenue du Petit Château, 91800 Brunoy, France 6 2Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Département Adaptations du Vivant, UMR 7245 MCAM, 57 7 rue Cuvier, CP 54, 75005 Paris, France 8 3Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Département Origines et Évolution, USR 3224 CRC, 57 rue 9 Cuvier, CP 21, 75005 Paris, France 10 4Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Département Adaptations du Vivant, 57 rue Cuvier, CP 26, 11 75005 Paris, France 12 Corresponding author: Jean-François Ponge, [email protected], tel. -
Fly Times, 50 1
FLY TIMES ISSUE 50, April, 2013 Stephen D. Gaimari, editor Plant Pest Diagnostics Branch California Department of Food & Agriculture 3294 Meadowview Road Sacramento, California 95832, USA Tel: (916) 262-1131 FAX: (916) 262-1190 Email: [email protected] Welcome to the latest issue of Fly Times! I'm not sure whether to celebrate the 50th issue of the newsletter, or hold off until the next issue, which will represent 25 years of Fly Times! I choose to do both! (Celebration ensues...). I thank everyone for sending in such interesting articles, as always – I hope you all enjoy reading it as much as I enjoyed putting it together! Please let me encourage all of you to consider contributing articles that may be of interest to the Diptera community for the next issue. Fly Times offers a great forum to report on your research activities and to make requests for taxa being studied, as well as to report interesting observations about flies, to discuss new and improved methods, to advertise opportunities for dipterists, to report on or announce meetings relevant to the community, etc., with all the associated digital images you wish to provide. This is also a great place to report on your interesting (and hopefully fruitful) collecting activities! Really anything fly-related is considered. I also want to thank Chris Borkent for again assembling the list of Diptera citations since the last Fly Times, and to announce that Chris will be taking on this responsibility from here on, at least until he wants to stop! The electronic version of the Fly Times continues to be hosted on the North American Dipterists Society website at http://www.nadsdiptera.org/News/FlyTimes/Flyhome.htm. -
Studies of Soil Fauna with Special Reference to the Collembola
- I I I STUDIES OF SOIL FAUNA WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE I TO THE COLLEMBOLA Peter F. Bellinger THE CONNECTICUT AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION NEW HAVEN I BULLETIN 583, JANUARY, 1954 I I STUDIES OF SOIL FAUNA WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE COLLEMBOLA Peter F. Bellinger THE CONNECTICUT AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION NEW HAVEN BULLETIN 583, JANUARY, 1954 CONTENTS Page ........................................ INTRODUCTION ........................................ 5 HABITA'TS STUDIED ...................... ...... THE FAUNA ......................... ..... ................................................ 14 Key to the Collembola .............................................................. 16 Other Arthropods .................... ....... ..................................... 27 ANALYSIS .............................................................................................. Differences and Similarities between Areas ............................. Methods of Analysis .............................. ........................... Differences in Species Occurrence ................... .... Characterization of the Areas .................................. Causes of Population Differences ..................................... Vertical Distribution .................................................................... Seasonal Variation ....................................................................... SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 63 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..................................................................... -
Comparison of Dung and Soil Fauna from Pastures Treated with and Without Ivermectin As an Example of the Effects of a Veterinary Pharmaceutical Final Report
TEXTE 54 /2017 Comparison of dung and soil fauna from pastures treated with and without ivermectin as an example of the effects of a veterinary pharmaceutical Final Report TEXTE 54/2017 Environmental Research of the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety Project No. (FKZ) 3710 63 412 Report No. (UBA-FB) 002155/E Comparison of dung and soil fauna from pastures treated with and without ivermectin as an example of the effects of a veterinary pharmaceutical by Dr. Jörg Römbke (Co-ordination), Dipl.-Ing. Adam Scheffczyk ECT Oekotoxikologie GmbH, Flörsheim, Germany Prof. Jean-Pierre Lumaret, Thomas Tixier University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France Dr. Wolf Blanckenhorn Zoologisches Museum, University of Zurich-Irchel, Zurich, Switzerland Dr. Joost Lahr Alterra, Wageningen, The Netherlands Dr. Kevin Floate Lethbridge Research Center, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4P4, Canada On behalf of the German Environment Agency Imprint Publisher: Umweltbundesamt Wörlitzer Platz 1 06844 Dessau-Roßlau Tel: +49 340-2103-0 Fax: +49 340-2103-2285 [email protected] Internet: www.umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt Study performed by: ECT Oekotoxikologie GmbH Böttgerstraße 2 – 14 65439 Flörsheim, Germany University of Montpellier 163 rue Auguste Broussonnet 34090 Montpellier, France Zoologisches Museum, University of Zurich-Irchel, KarlSchmidt-Straße 4 80006 Zurich, Switzerland Alterra Droevendaalsesteeg 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands Lethbridge Research Center 5403 1 Ave S Lethbridge, AB T1J 4P4, Canada Study completed in: December 2013 Edited by: Section IV 2.2 Pharmaceuticals, Washing and Cleaning Agents Dr. Nicole Adler Publication as pdf: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen ISSN 1862-4804 Dessau-Roßlau, June 2017 The project underlying this report was financed by the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear safety under project number FKZ 3710 63 412. -
Flooding in a Grassland Diversity Experiment:Response of Microorganisms, Microarthropods and Predator
Flooding in a grassland diversity experiment: response of microorganisms, microarthropods and predator – prey interactions Dissertation zur Erlangung des mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorgrades "Doctor rerum naturalium" der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen im Promotionsprogramm Biologie der Georg-August University School of Science (GAUSS) vorgelegt von Diplom-Biologin Odette González Macé aus Tres Cantos, Spain Göttingen, März 2018 Betreuungsausschuss Stefan Scheu and Mark Maraun, J.F. Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology; Göttingen University Mitglieder der Prüfungskommission Referent: Stefan Scheu Korreferent: Mark Maraun Weitere Mitglieder der Prüfungskommission: Marko Rohlfs, Population and Evolutionary Ecology, Bremen University Christoph Bleidorn, Animal Evolution and Biodiversity, Göttingen University Klaus Hövemeyer, Zoology and Anthropology; Göttingen University Nico Eisenhauer, Experimental Interaction Ecology, Leipzig University Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 4. May. 2018 To forget how to dig the earth and to tend the soil is to forget ourselves Mahatma Gandhi Table of Contents SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 1 ............................................................................................................................. 3 GENERAL INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 4 ABOVEGROUND‐BELOWGROUND FOOD