DOCSLIB.ORG

Northern Peripheral, Sparsely Populated Regions in the European Union and in Norway

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Northern Peripheral, Sparsely Populated Regions in the European Union and in Norway Study on Northern peripheral, sparsely populated Regions in the European Union and in Norway Northern Peripheral, Sparsely Populated Regions in the European Union and in Norway Erik Gløersen, Alexandre Dubois, Andrew Copus Carsten Schürmann NORDREGIO 2006 Nordregio Report 2006:2 ISSN 1403-2503 ISBN 91-89332-60-1 © 2006 Nordregio Cover illustrations: - Overlay of 1x1 km grid cell populations and areas within 60 minutes of nearest airport (fig 5.10) - KA Hallden: Iron ore train, Kiruna municipality Nordregio P.O. Box 1658 SE-111 86 Stockholm, Sweden [email protected] www.nordregio.se www.norden.se Nordic Council of Ministers Nordic Council Nordregio Store Strandstraede 18 P.O.Box 3043 P.O.Box 1658 DK-1255 Copenhagen K DK-1021 Copenhagen K SE-11186 Stockholm Phone: +45-33-960 200 Phone: +45-33-960 400 Phone: +46-8-463 54 00 Fax: +45-33-960 202 Fax: +45-33-111870 Fax: +46-8-463 54 01 http://www.norden.org http://www.norden.org http://www.nordregio.se Nordic co-operation takes place among the countries of Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden, as well as the autonomous territories of the Faroe Islands, Greenland and Åland. The Nordic Council is a forum for co-operation between the Nordic parliaments and governments. The Council consists of 87 parliamentarians from the Nordic countries. The Nordic Council takes policy initiatives and monitors Nordic co- operation. Founded in 1952. The Nordic Council of Ministers is a forum of co-operation between the Nordic governments. The Nordic Council of Ministers implements Nordic co-operation. The prime ministers have the overall responsibility. Its activities are co-ordinated by the Nordic ministers for co-operation, the Nordic Committee for co-operation and portfolio ministers. Founded in 1971. Nordregio – Nordic Centre for Spatial Development was established in 1997 by the Nordic Council of Ministers on behalf of the governments of the five Nordic countries and serves as an independent research institute on questions concerning spatial planning and regional development. The institute applies a comparative Nordic and European perspective in its investigations. Contents Preface............................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1. Summary................................................................................................................................................................. 2 2. Introduction......................................................................................................................................................... 21 2.1. European recognition of the structural weaknesses of sparsely populated areas.................................................................................................................. 21 2.2. Three separate handicaps .....................................................................................................................22 2.3. Theoretical accounts of the main disadvantages associated with Sparsity / Peripherality .............................................................................................23 3. Delimitating sparsely populated areas in the European Union ................................................................29 3.1. Delimitation according to NUTS 2 and NUTS 3 average densities.............................................29 3.2. A delimitation approach reflecting the social and economic issues of sparsity ........................34 3.3. Population potentials in Europe...........................................................................................................37 3.4. Identification of sparsely populated areas.........................................................................................39 3.5. Delimitation of the study area .............................................................................................................45 4. Demography 4.1. Settlement patterns in the Nordic peripheries .................................................................................57 4.2. Demographic trends over the last decade.........................................................................................64 4.3. Age structure ...........................................................................................................................................73 5. Measuring peripherality and accessibility in the Nordic peripheries ......................................................81 5.1. What is accessibility? .............................................................................................................................82 5.2. European accessibility measures..........................................................................................................92 5.3. Access to airports ...................................................................................................................................97 5.4. Road maintenance costs......................................................................................................................108 5.5. Rail connections in the study area.....................................................................................................110 5.6. Seaports and ferry connections .........................................................................................................113 5.7. Access to universities in the northernmost regions .......................................................................118 6. Socioeconomic characterisation of Sparsely populated areas .............................................................125 6.1. Employment.............................................................................................................................................125 6.2. Sources of income..................................................................................................................................135 6.3. Educational attainments.......................................................................................................................138 6.4. Wealth production.................................................................................................................................141 7. Terrain and climate.........................................................................................................................................145 7.1. Climatic conditions in the Nordic peripheries...............................................................................145 7.2. Assessing the economic effects of extreme climatic conditions................................................147 7.3. Land use.................................................................................................................................................151 7.4. Protected areas....................................................................................................................................155 8. Conclusion: The Northern periphery problem – A Syndrome of Disadvantage ..............................159 References................................................................................................................................................................165 Figures Chapter 1: Summary Figure 1.1. Areas with a population potential of 100 000 persons or less within a radius of 50 km........................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 1.2. Study area delimitation ............................................................................................................ 5 Figure 1.3. Settlement patterns in the Nordic peripheries ................................................................... 7 Figure 1.4. Cross-tabulation of net migration and population potentials......................................... 8 Figure 1.5. Population change from 1993 to 2002.............................................................................. 9 Figure 1.6. Potential accessibility by road to population in EU 27, Norway and Switzerland ............................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 1.7. Areas within 1 hour of the nearest airport ....................................................................... 12 Figure 1.8. Cross-tabulation of unemployment rates and population potentials ........................ 14 Figure 1.9. National variations in income levels.................................................................................... 15 Figure 1.10. National variations in proportions of transfer-income................................................... 16 Chapter 3: Sparsity Figure 3.1. Average population densities at NUTS-2 level................................................................ 32 Figure 3.2. Average population densities at NUTS-3 level................................................................ 33 Figure 3.3. Theoretical model illustrating the effect of centre structures on sparsity ............... 35 Figure 3.4. Population potentials within a 50 km radius in Europe................................................. 38 Figure 3.5. Sparsely populated areas in Europe - threshold of 50 inh/km2 ................................. 42 Figure 3.6. Sparsely populated areas in Europe - threshold of 12.5 inh/km2............................... 43 Figure 3.7. Sparsely populated areas
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bitstream – Capacity Building for Innovation
    Bitstream – Capacity Building for Innovation Final Report Mikael Söderström, Umeå Universitet Ulf Hedestig, Umeå Universitet Terje Fallmyr, Universitetet i Nordland Kjell Ellingsen, Universitetet i Nordland Hallstein Hegerholm, Høgskolen i Nesna Geir-Tore Klæboe, Høgskolen i Nesna WP-14.01 ISSN:1401-4580 Department of Informatics 1 Acknowledgments The project is financed by the European Interreg Botnia Atlantica and following partners 2 Introduction The report presents the realization of and results from the Botnia Atlantica funded project BitStream – Capacity Building for Innovation. The project started March 15 2013 and ended October 31 2014. Originally the project was scheduled to end April 15 2014, but for several reasons the project applied for and was granted extension until October 31 2014. The coordinating funding receiver has been Umeå University and the other Swedish partners has been the municipalities of Sorsele and Storuman. In Norway the partners has been Nesna University College, University of Nordland, the municipal of Bodø and the Norwegian National Collection Agency in Mo i Rana. In short, Bitstream is based on the starting-point that successful development of public administration requires good understanding of how its activities are conducted and how they are perceived by its citizens/customers. This means that process mapping and subsequent process analysis and impact mapping is a fundamental condition for innovative business development aimed at creating ICT innovations in the form of, for example, mobile apps or web-based services. The main objective of the project was to create a transnational platform for capacity building and exchange of experiences in the area of innovative business development.
    [Show full text]
  • Aakre.Pdf (1.469Mb)
    Teacher Education in Contemporary Japan A Norwegian Perspective Bjorn Magne Aakre Nesna University College 2013 1 Bjorn Magne Aakre, Nesna University College Preface I like to express my gratitude to all and everyone who supported this work, especially those who are mention in the report. Thanks also to partners and respondents, and all who helped me both financially and in practical matters. Thanks to The Scandinavia-Japan Sasakawa Foundation for financial support. My travel took place in November - December 2012. Kongsberg January 30, 2013. Bjorn Magne Aakre, Professor/PhD Preface 2 1. Introduction 3 1.1 Research problem 4 1.2 Methodology 4 2. Otemon Gakuin University and Teacher Education 4 3. Koyasan, Koyasan University and Teacher Education 6 4. Wakayama University and Teacher Education 8 5. Nagoya Keizai University and Ichimura Kindergarten 9 5.1 Ichimura kindergarten 10 6. Aichi University of Education and Anahashi kindergarten 11 6.1 Anahashi kindergarten 13 7. Other 7.1 Science and Technology Education 14 7.2 Expo Park Osaka 14 7.3 Kawabata, Yashunari 14 7.5 Sony and Handa 15 7.6 Teacher Education and Entrepreneurship 15 7.6 Former students and their families 16 8. Conclusion 16 8.1 Teacher Education 17 8.2. Career preparation, from school and work 17 8.3. Teacher professionalism and ethics 18 8.4 Specialization in teacher education 18 8.5 Practice in teacher education 18 8.5 Master of Education 18 Literature 19 2 Bjorn Magne Aakre, Nesna University College Abstract This paper is a preliminary report, not a scientific article, on my research travel to Japan that lasted for about 5 weeks in the end of 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bologna Process and Heis Institutional Autonomy
    Athens Journal of Education - Volume 7, Issue 4, November 2020 – Pages 365-384 The Bologna Process and HEIs Institutional Autonomy By Linda Helén Haukland The Bologna Process has made a strong impact on the development of European higher education, although the greatest impact has not been from the process itself, but from the national reforms introduced along with it. With a relatively young higher education system, Norway was ahead of most European countries in implementing the Bologna Process and reforms indirectly linked to it. Due to path dependencies and the Higher Education Institutions being, to a certain extent, autonomous and carriers of their own culture, we cannot draw conclusions at the local level without empirical studies. Therefore, the case of Nord University shows us how this process directly and indirectly affected Higher Education Institutions in Norway. The Higher Education Institutions (HEI) integrated horizontally in an education system that was increasingly hierarchical and competitive. The need for standardisation in order to secure equality and efficiency, and the demand for greater autonomy in the HEIs was answered by strengthening some and weakening other forms of institutional autonomy along with the establishment of a new accreditation system. Three dimensions of autonomy are touched on in this study. Firstly, the question of who has decision-making power in the HEIs defines whether they are ruled by professional or administrative autonomy. Secondly, the question of the HEIs’ mission is decided either by the HEI itself, representing substantive autonomy, or by external demands on production and external funding, representing what I call beneficial autonomy. Finally, the question of how the HEIs fulfil their mission decides whether they have individual autonomy or procedural autonomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Nesna Kommune Planstrategi 2020- 2023
    Nesna Kommune Planstrategi 2020- 2023 1 Innholdsfortegnelse Kommunal planstrategi som verktøy for bedre kommunal planlegging .................... 3 Lovgrunnlaget ................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Nasjonale forventninger til kommunal planlegging...................................................................................... 4 Regionale forventninger til planlegging .............................................................................................................. 5 Kommunal planstrategi ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Utviklingstrekk og utfordringer ............................................................................................. 5 Sosial Bærekraft ................................................................................................................................... 6 Befolkningsutvikling ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 Utdanning ............................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Fattigdom og ulikhet.....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonic Lineaments of Norway 153
    NORWEGIAN JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY Tectonic lineaments of Norway 153 Tectonic lineaments of Norway Roy H. Gabrielsen, Alvor Braathen, John Dehls & David Roberts Gabrielsen, R. H., Braathen, A, Dehls, J. & Roberts, D.: Tectonic lineaments of Norway. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, Vol. 82, pp. 153-17 4. Trondheim 2002. ISSN 029-196X. Tectonic lineaments of the Norwegian mainland have been outlined and characterised in a new lineament map of Norway. The underlay is a natio­ nal coverage of Landsat TM 7 scenes with 15 m pixel resolution, which have been interpreted at a scale of 1:750,000. The database contains nearly 8000 lineaments that, with the aid of statistical tools (orientation, density) and general characteristics, have been separated into distinct spatia! zones, populations and sets. The most prominent lineament zones of Norway are the N-S-striking Oslo-Trondheim and Bergen zones. The former is considered to represent a Neoproterozoic fracture system,since it clearly affects the geographical extent of younger lineament populations. Both zones were active in the Per­ mian, whereas the Bergen Zone also underwent Mesozoic rejuvenation. Today, both zones experience relatively frequent,though minor earthqua­ kes.Another important N-S fea ture,albeit more dispersed,is the Finnmark Zone. The regional, ENE-WSW-striking Møre-Trøndelag Fault Complex is clearly displayed in the scenes. It consists of mainly ENE-WSW (NE-SW) major and minor faults witha documented history ranging from Devonian to Recent, mirroring activity on the shelf. The Agder Zone has a similar orientation, consisting of two sets (NE-SW and ENE-WSW), and can be traced from Stavanger to the western margin of the Oslo Graben.
    [Show full text]
  • Utgitt Av Statens Kartverk
    ETTERRETNINGEREfEERRETNINGERETTERRETNINGER FORFOR SJØFARENDFORSJØF SJØFARENDARENDEs eeeeeEE Notices to Mariners STATENS KARTVERK Nr 1 SJØ Årgang 141 Sta vanger 15. januar 2010 ISSN 1890-6117 1/10 2 UTGITT AV STATENS KARTVERK SJØ - SJØKARTVERKET Etterretninger for sjøfarende (Efs) utkommer to ganger månedlig både i analog- og digital utgave og gir opplysninger om kartrettelser i norske sjøkart, og andre midlertidige(T) og foreløpige(P) meddelelser vedrørende seilas i norske farvann. Efs i digital form er av Sjøfartsdirektoratet godkjent på lik linje med papirutgaven av Efs og overføres via E-post som PDF fil (Acrobat Reader). Den digitale Efs vil være tilgjengelig for abonnenten 2 til 3 dager før papirutgaven foreligger. Årlig abonnement koster kr. 580,-. Dersom det bestilles både papirutgave og digital utgave gis det 50% rabatt på den elektroniske utgaven. Tegning av årlig abonnement etter kalenderårets begynnelse gir rett til å få tilsendt tidligere utgaver av samme år. The Etterretninger for sjøfarende (Efs) is published twice a month. The Efs is also available in digital format as a PDF file sent via e-mail Twelve months subscription costs NOK 580,- If a subscriber wants both the paper- and the electronic version, we give a 50% discount on the electronic version. Abonnement bestilles gjennom (Subscription to): Statens kartverk Sjø Postboks 60 4001 Stavanger Telefon 51 85 87 00 Telefax 51 85 87 01 Telefax kartsalget 51 85 87 03 E-post (E-mail): [email protected] Redaksjon Efs: E-post (E-mail): [email protected] Internett: www.statkart.no/efs Telefax: 51 85 87 06 —————————————————————————————————— INTERNETT Etterretninger for sjøfarende er også tilgjengelig på Internett, www.statkart.no/efs Her finnes også opplysninger om kartrettelser for hvert enkelt kart, trykningsdatoer for norske sjøkart, oversikt over rettelser på hvert kart, (T) og (P) meldinger og riggbevegelser i norske havområder.
    [Show full text]
  • Notat Utviklingsanalyse Nesna Kommune
    Notat Foto: Distriktssenteret Utviklingsanalyse Nesna kommune Forfattere: Dato 24.02.2021 Knut Baglo, Tore Svartås og Stine-Aileen Strand Tabell- og figuroversikt .......................................................................................................................... 3 1. Innledning ....................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Næringslivets struktur ................................................................................................................... 4 3. Robusthet – systemnivå ................................................................................................................. 7 4. Største bedrifter i kommunen ..................................................................................................... 10 5. Utviklingsevne .............................................................................................................................. 13 6. Naturressurser .............................................................................................................................. 14 7. Kommunikasjoner og pendling .................................................................................................... 15 8. Demografi og menneskelige ressurser ........................................................................................ 16 9. Konklusjoner og forslag til tiltak .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Johan E. Arntzen SANDVIKA in NORTHERN NORWAY: the NORTHERNMOST ‘BRONZE AGE’ SETTLEMENT in SCANDINAVIA
    Fennoscandia archaeologica XXXII (2015) Johan E. Arntzen SANDVIKA IN NORTHERN NORWAY: THE NORTHERNMOST ‘BRONZE AGE’ SETTLEMENT IN SCANDINAVIA Abstract In Sandvika, located at nearly 70° latitude in northern Norway, evidence of a settlement site with clear connections to the Nordic Bronze Age complex was investigated in 2013. The features uncovered included a three-aisled longhouse and several cooking pits. The artefacts consisted of asbestos-tempered ceramics, soapstone vessels and a fragment of a soapstone mould for casting a socketed axe. Burnt animal bones recovered from a fireplace indicate the presence of domesticated animals in the form of sheep or goat. Also fragments of seal and fish bones were uncovered, and seen in connection with the find of a fishing sinker a strictly agrarian economy is out of the question. 14C-dating indicates a main habitation phase between c 1000–800 BC, a date also supported by the artefact material as well as the construction type of the building. The site mirrors the only other Late Bronze Age house in northern Norway as well as settle- ments further south. The Sandvika locality also sheds new light on the so-called drift sand sites found on the northern Norwegian coast. It is suggested that these sites have been of the same type as the one in Sandvika. Nonetheless, it is highlighted that this settlement hardly can be understood as a mirror image of what is found further south, and that it must be understood in light of its local and regional setting. Keywords: northern Norway, Bronze Age, longhouse, asbestos ceramics, farming Johan E.
    [Show full text]
  • Kystplan Helgeland Planbeskrivelse Del 1
    KYSTPLAN KYSTPLANHELGELAND HELGELAND Interkommunal kystsoneplan med konsekvensutredning for: Bindal, Sømna, Vega, Vevelstad, Herøy, Dønna, Leirfjord, Nesna, Træna, Lurøy og Rødøy DEL 1 KYSTPLAN Revisjon 12.04.2019 HELGELAND KYSTPLAN HELGELAND DEL 1: Plandokument DEL 2: Overordnet konsekvensutredning og konsekvensutredning av enkelttiltak KYSTPLAN HELGELAND KYSTPLAN HELGELAND Interkommunal kystsoneplan med konsekvensutredning for: Bindal, Sømna, Vega, Vevelstad, Herøy, Dønna, Leirfjord, Nesna, Træna, Lurøy og Rødøy. VEGA/01.05.2016. REVISJON 12.04.2019. Prosjekteier: SØR-HELGELAND REGIONRÅD Prosjektleder: MONA GILSTAD GIS-medarbeider: HÅVARD HAMMERSTAD / JAN CHRISTER TORVIK, ARKON AS Finansiert av: NORDLAND FYLKESKOMMUNE, SØR-HELGELAND REGIONRÅD, HELGELAND REGIONRÅD, INDRE HELGELAND REGIONRÅD. Forfatter: MONA GILSTAD Utforming: GAUTE HAUGLID-FORMO Forsidefoto: GAUTE HAUGLID-FORMO DEL 1: KYSTPLAN HELGELAND 2018–2022 Plandokument Revisjon 12.04.2019 FORORD Helgelandskysten er en felles ressurs for befolkningen og inngrep i en kommune vil kunne ha ­konsekvenser­også­for­nabokommunene­da­havstrømmer­kontinuerlig­forflytter­vannmassene.­ Planleggingen av kystsonen er en viktig del av å skape gode rammebetingelser for en bærekraftig vekst på­Helgelandskysten.­En­helhetlig­arealplanlegging­og­samordning­av­de­ulike­interessene­i­kyst­ sonen­er­essensielt­i­arbeidet­for­å­legge­til­rette­for­fremtidig­utvikling­i­regionen.­På­denne­bakgrunn­ har ”Kystplan Helgeland” og 11 kystkommuner gjennomført en felles kystsoneplanlegging med felles planprogram, utredinger og kunnskapsgrunnlag, felles sømløst plankart med bestemmelser og retnings­ linjer,­felles­planbeskrivelse­med­overordnet­KU­danner­grunnlaget­for­juridisk­bindende­arealplaner­i­sjø. Kystsoneplan Helgeland (KPH) er en plan for sjø­ Fiskeressursene er tillagt stor vekt og gytefelt, aktive arealene på Helgeland som gir en enhetlig areal­ reketrålfelter og kaste og låssetningsplasser er avsatt forvaltning med like krav og bestemmelser i alle i kartet.
    [Show full text]
  • The Family of Hans Emahus Isakson
    The Family of Hans Emahus Isakson Anthony Edward Hanson July 2008 The Family of Hans Emahus Isakson Forward______________________________________________________________ 3 I. Hans Emahus Isakson _______________________________________________ 5 A. The Parents of Hans Emahus Isakson _____________________________________ 8 1. Isak Johan Larsen _____________________________________________________________ 8 2. Maren Christiane Andersdatter __________________________________________________ 20 B. The Brothers & Sisters of Hans Emahus Isakson___________________________ 25 1. Anton Edvard Isakson _________________________________________________________ 27 2. Lorents Andreas Isakson _______________________________________________________ 40 3. Cristine Marie Isakson_________________________________________________________ 52 4. Elisabeth Isakson_____________________________________________________________ 58 5. Elias Nicolai Isakson __________________________________________________________ 59 6. Jacob Johan Isakson___________________________________________________________ 60 7. Benjamin Nicolai Isakson ______________________________________________________ 62 8. Anna Elisabet Isakson _________________________________________________________ 72 II. Inger Heline Andersdatter__________________________________________ 75 A. The Parents of Inger Heline Andersdatter ________________________________ 82 1. Anders Anderssen ____________________________________________________________ 82 2. Stine Christensdatter __________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • The Striking Similarities Between Northern Norway and Northern Sweden Jonas Stein* Uit the Arctic University of Norway
    Arctic Review on Law and Politics Peer-reviewed article Vol. 10, 2019, pp. 79–102 The Striking Similarities between Northern Norway and Northern Sweden Jonas Stein* UiT The Arctic University of Norway Abstract Contrary to the view held by many actors, this paper, by using a quantitative and longitudinal anal- ysis in a comparative perspective, show that demographic development in Northern Norway and Northern Sweden is much more similar than many think. Over the last 60 years, there has been a small negative trend in the relative percentage of the national population that lives in the two regions, with “knowledge cities”, and especially the two university cities Tromsø and Umeå, as the exception. Despite Broxian social theories of regional development in Northern Norway and the implementation of a generous set of regional policies, there seems to be no cause to claim that Northern Norway has followed a unique path of development compared to Northern Sweden, neither in general nor in smaller and more rural communities. Keywords: regional policy, Arctic, Northern Norway, university, municipalities Responsible Editor: Øyvind Ravna, UiT – The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway Received: April 2018; Accepted: March 2019; Published: March 2019 1. Introduction Many politicians1, scholars2 and regional actors have proclaimed that Norway’s regional policies in Northern Norway have succeeded extremely well. Since the mid-1970s Norwegian authorities have implemented generous policies for regional 1 Kjell Werner, “Helga satser på by og land,” FriFagbevegelse, https://frifagbevegelse.no/ article-6.158.52638.bdb95fa104. 2 Ottar Brox, Hva skjer i Nord-Norge? (Oslo: Pax Forl., 1966). *Correspondence to: Jonas Stein, email: [email protected] © 2019 Jonas Stein.
    [Show full text]
  • Entoloma Species of the Rhodopolioid Clade
    Entoloma species of the rhodopolioid clade (subgenus Entoloma; Tricholomatinae, Basidiomycota) in Norway Tor Erik Brandrud1, Egil Bendiksen1, John Bjarne Jordal2, Øyvind Weholt3, Siw Elin Eidissen3, Jostein Lorås3, Bálint Dima4,5, Machiel E. Noordeloos6 1Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Gaustadalléen 21, NO-0349 Oslo, Norway 2Biolog J.B. Jordal, Auragata 3, NO-6600 Sunndalsøra, Norway 3Nord University, Nesna, NO-8700 Nesna, Norway 4Department of Plant Anatomy, Institute of Biology, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/c, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 5Department of Biosciences, Plant Biology, Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, 00014 Helsinki, Finland 6Naturalis Biodiversity Center, section Botany, P.O. Box 9517, NL-2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands Corresponding author: [email protected] arter innenfor Rhodopolia-gruppa er samlet og verifisert med DNA-sekvensering. Av Norsk tittel: Rødsporer i Rhodopolia-gruppa disse er 10 nye for Norge og inkluderer også (Entoloma underslekt Entoloma; Tricholoma- tre ubeskrevne arter. Fire forskjellige øko- tinae, Basidiomycota) i Norge geografiske elementer kan skilles ut: (i) det sørlige (boreonemorale) lind-eik-hassel- Brandrud TE, Bendiksen E, Jordal JB, Weholt elementet, (ii) det boreal-arktisk-alpine selje- Ø, Eidissen SE, Lorås J, Dima B, Noordeloos vier-or-bjørk-elementet, (iii) det arktisk- ME, 2018. Entoloma species of the rhodopo- alpine dvergvier(-reinrose)-elementet, og (iv) lioid clade (subgenus Entoloma; Tricholoma- det boreale bjørk(-gran)-elementet. Alle 24 tinae, Basidiomycota) in Norway. Agarica artene kommenteres i den taksonomiske delen, 2018, vol. 38: 21–46. ordnet etter de fem slektskapsgruppene (klader) som framkommer i den fylogenetiske analysen. KEY WORDS: DNA-sequencing, ecology, distribution, Salix-Alnus-Betula-associates, ABSTRACT Tilia-Quercus associates The rhodopolioid species of Entoloma (subgen.
    [Show full text]