DOCSLIB.ORG

NPS-IS) for Town of Washington Court House-Paint Creek HUC-12 (05060003 01 03

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NPS-IS) for Town of Washington Court House-Paint Creek HUC-12 (05060003 01 03 Nine-Element Nonpoint Source Implementation Strategy (NPS-IS) for Town of Washington Court House-Paint Creek HUC-12 (05060003 01 03) Prepared for: Fayette Soil & Water Conservation District Prepared by: Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Toledo, Ohio Version 1.0 Approved: June 30, 2021 This page intentionally left blank. Acknowledgements Version 1.0 prepared and written by: Deanna Bobak Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. 4841 Monroe Street, Suite 103 Toledo, OH 43623 Brigitte Hisey Fayette Soil & Water Conservation District 1415 US 22 SW, Suite 500 Washington Court House, OH 43160 The Fayette Soil & Water Conservation District (SWCD) would like to acknowledge the collaboration of multiple partners in the preparation of this Nonpoint Source Implementation Strategy (NPS-IS) for the Town of Washington Court House-Paint Creek HUC-12 (05060003 01 03). The Fayette SWCD appreciates those individuals and organizations that contributed background information, insight into objectives and projects for inclusion in this NPS-IS. Thank you to Rick Wilson, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency – Division of Surface Water, for guidance throughout the NPS-IS development process, as well as Jessica D’Ambrosio and the staff of The Nature Conservancy for providing modeling data generated by the Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework (ACPF). This product or publication was financed in part or totally through a grant from the United States Environmental Protection Agency through an assistance agreement with the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. The contents and views, including any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations, contained in this product or publication are those of the authors and have not been subject to any Ohio Environmental Protection Agency or United States Environmental Protection Agency peer or administrative review and may not necessarily reflect the views of the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency or the United States Environmental Protection Agency and no official endorsement should be inferred. Cover photo: Paint Creek near Christman Park, photo courtesy of Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. i Fayette Soil & Water Conservation District CEC Project 303-378 Nonpoint Source-Implementation Strategy Acronyms and Abbreviations The acronyms and abbreviations below are commonly used by organizations working to restore Ohio’s watersheds and are found throughout this document. Numbers §319 Section 319 of the Clean Water Act A ACPF Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework ALU Aquatic Life Use B BMP Best Management Practice C CAFF Confined Animal Feeding Facility CAFO Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation CDL Cropland Data Layer CRP Conservation Reserve Program CREP Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program D DEM Digital Elevation Model DO Dissolved Oxygen E E. coli Escherichia coli ECBP Eastern Corn Belt Plains ECHO Enforcement and Compliance History Online (database) EPT Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera – sensitive macroinvertebrate species EQIP Environmental Quality Incentives Program EWH Exceptional Warmwater Habitat F FOTG Field Office Technical Guide FLS Federally Listed Species FSA Farm Service Agency G GIS Geographic Information Systems H HAB Harmful Algal Bloom HSTS Home Sewage Treatment System HTF Hypoxia Task Force HUC Hydrologic Unit Code Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. ii Fayette Soil & Water Conservation District CEC Project 303-378 Nonpoint Source-Implementation Strategy I IBI Index of Biotic Integrity ICI Invertebrate Community Index M MARB Mississippi/Atchafalaya River Basin MHP Mobile Home Park MIwb Modified Index of Well Being MRBI Mississippi River Basin Initiative MWH Modified Warmwater Habitat N NH3 Nitrogen (as ammonia) NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NPS Nonpoint Source NPS-IS Nonpoint Source-Implementation Strategy NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service O OAC Ohio Administrative Code ODA Ohio Department of Agriculture ODH Ohio Department of Health ODNR Ohio Department of Natural Resources Ohio EPA Ohio Environmental Protection Agency OpTIS Operational Tillage Information System ORB Ohio River Basin ORBA Ohio River Basin Alliance OSU Ohio State University P PAD-US Protected Areas Database of the United States PCWP Paint Creek Watershed Project PSS Project Summary Sheet Q QHEI Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index R RM River Mile RPHF Ross, Pickaway, Highland, Fayette (Solid Waste District) S SWCD Soil and Water Conservation District T TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load TSS Total Suspended Solids Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. iii Fayette Soil & Water Conservation District CEC Project 303-378 Nonpoint Source-Implementation Strategy U USDA United States Department of Agriculture USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service USGS United States Geological Survey V VRT Variable Rate Technology W WAP Watershed Action Plan WPCLF Water Pollution Control Loan Fund WQS Water Quality Standards (Ohio Administrative Code 3745-1) WRP Wetlands Reserve Program WRRSP Water Resource Restoration Sponsor Program WWH Warmwater Habitat WWTP Waste Water Treatment Plant Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. iv Fayette Soil & Water Conservation District CEC Project 303-378 Nonpoint Source-Implementation Strategy Table of Contents Acknowledgements.............................................................................................................................i Acronyms and Abbreviations .............................................................................................................. ii Chapter 1: Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Report Background .......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Watershed Profile & History ............................................................................................ 4 1.3 Public Participation and Involvement .............................................................................. 6 Chapter 2: HUC-12 Watershed Characterization and Assessment Summary ........................................ 8 2.1 Summary of HUC-12 Watershed Characterization .......................................................... 8 2.2 Summary of HUC-12 Biological Trends .......................................................................... 15 2.3 Summary of HUC-12 Pollution Causes and Associated Sources .................................... 18 2.4 Additional Information for Determining Critical Areas and Developing Implementation Strategies ....................................................................................................................... 20 Chapter 3: Critical Area Conditions AND Restoration Strategies ....................................................... 21 3.1 Overview of Critical Areas ............................................................................................. 21 3.2 Critical Area #1: Conditions, Goals & Objectives for Prioritized Agricultural Lands ...... 22 3.3 Critical Area #2: Conditions, Goals & Objectives for Nutrient Reduction from Urban Lands .............................................................................................................................. 30 3.4 Critical Area #3: Conditions, Goals & Objectives for Streambank and Riparian Restoration .................................................................................................................... 35 Chapter 4: Projects and Implementation Strategy ............................................................................ 42 4.1 Critical Area #1 Project and Implementation Strategy Overview Table ........................ 43 4.2 Critical Area #2 Project and Implementation Strategy Overview Table ........................ 44 4.3 Critical Area #3 Project and Implementation Strategy Overview Table ........................ 45 Chapter 5: Works Cited ................................................................................................................... 50 Table of Figures Town of Washington Court House-Paint Creek HUC-12 Overview ........................................... 1 Paint Creek Watershed .............................................................................................................. 5 Location of the Town of Washington Court House-Paint Creek HUC-12 .................................. 5 Soils by Particle Size .................................................................................................................. 9 Political Boundaries in the Town of Washington Court House-Paint Creek HUC-12 .............. 10 Land Use .................................................................................................................................. 11 Wetlands in the Town of Washington Court House-Paint Creek HUC-12 ............................... 13 Parks and Protected Lands ...................................................................................................... 13 Town of Washington Court House-Paint Creek HUC-12 Critical Area Overview .................... 21 Town of Washington Court House-Paint Creek HUC-12 Critical Area #1 ................................ 22 Town of Washington Court House-Paint Creek HUC-12 Critical Area #2 ................................ 30 Town of Washington Court House-Paint Creek HUC-12 Critical Area #3 ................................ 36 Civil
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Terran Cornoration Environmental Services
    Page 11 Terran Cornoration Environmental Services Mr. James Yskamp, Esq. February 1, 2018 Fair Shake Environmental Legal Services 159 South Main Street, Suite 1030 Akron, Ohio 44308 RE: Technical Report Review: "Evaluation of Groundwater Impacts, Dewatering of Proposed Enon Quarry, Clark County, Ohio " Dear Mr. Y skamp, I, Brent E. Huntsman, CPG, President and Principal Hydrogeologist ofTerran Corporation (Terran) was retained by Fair Shake Environmental Legal Services to review and comment upon the hydrogeologic characterization and predicted dewatering effects to the water resources of Mad River Township, Clark County, OH as described in a groundwater model report prepared for a mining permit modification. This report review was to include an evaluation of the aquifer response and hydraulic performance predicted by the model simulations of the groundwater system; the magnitude and extent of a cone of depression resulting from dewatering various limestone quarry pits. The purpose of my review is to provide a letter report summarizing my expert opinions regarding the adequacy of the groundwater model to appropriately simulate dewatering effects upon the local groundwater regime. All opinions in this report are based upon my review of existing information (developed through the litigation process in this case or in the public record) together with my 43-years of experience in applied hydrogeology, specifically aquifer characterization and water resources development. My current curriculum vita is included with this letter report as Attachment 2. These opinions are expressed to a reasonable degree of scientific and professional certainty. I reserve the right to supplement this report and opinions as additional material becomes available through the litigation process or continued review of public literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Waddle Ditch Rattlesnake Creek
    Nine-Element Nonpoint Source Implementation Strategy (NPS-IS) for Waddle Ditch-Rattlesnake Creek HUC-12 (05060003 03 05) Prepared for: Fayette Soil and Water Conservation District Prepared by: Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Toledo, Ohio Version 1.0 Approved: June 29, 2021 This page intentionally left blank. Acknowledgements Version 1.0 prepared and written by: Deanna Bobak Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. 4841 Monroe Street, Suite 103 Toledo, OH 43623 Brigitte Hisey Fayette Soil & Water Conservation District 1415 US 22 SW, Suite 500 Washington Court House, OH 43160 The Fayette Soil & Water Conservation District (SWCD) would like to acknowledge the collaboration of multiple partners in the preparation of this Nonpoint Source Implementation Strategy (NPS-IS) for the Waddle Ditch-Rattlesnake Creek HUC-12 (05060003 03 05). The Fayette SWCD appreciates those individuals and organizations that contributed background information, insight into objectives and projects for inclusion in this NPS-IS. Thank you to Rick Wilson, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency – Division of Surface Water, for guidance throughout the NPS-IS development process, as well as Jessica D’Ambrosio and the staff of The Nature Conservancy for providing modeling data generated by the Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework (ACPF). This product or publication was financed in part or totally through a grant from the United States Environmental Protection Agency through an assistance agreement with the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. The contents and views, including any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations, contained in this product or publication are those of the authors and have not been subject to any Ohio Environmental Protection Agency or United States Environmental Protection Agency peer or administrative review and may not necessarily reflect the views of the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency or the United States Environmental Protection Agency and no official endorsement should be inferred.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Drinking Water and Ecological Unusually Sensitive Areas (Usas): Examples Using the Water and Biological Resources of Ohio
    Development of Drinking Water and Ecological Unusually Sensitive Areas (USAs): Examples Using the Water and Biological Resources of Ohio Colin Plank, Scott Zengel, Heidi Hinkeldey, Elaine Inouye, William Holton, Jeffery Dahlin, and Jacqueline Michel Research Planning, Inc., 1121 Park Street, Columbia, SC 29201, [email protected], 803-256-7322 (voice); 803-254-6445 (fax); and Christina Sames and Samuel Hall, Office of Pipeline Safety, Research and Special Programs Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. 1.0 INTRODUCTION The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA) is required to identify areas unusually sensitive to environmental damage in the event of a hazardous liquid pipeline accident. Pipeline operators that can affect "unusually sensitive areas" (USAs) must develop and follow an integrity management program to assess and evaluate the integrity of their pipelines. After extensive consultation with experts, government agencies, and other stakeholders, a process was developed to identify USAs for drinking water and ecological resources. In general the USA identification process involves selecting a subset of USA candidates from the larger group of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs), and then applying various filter criteria to the candidates to determine final USAs. For drinking water USAs this means identifying potentially sensitive public water systems (PWS), specifically surface water intakes and ground water wells, and subjecting them to filter
    [Show full text]
  • Xerox University Microfilms
    information t o u s e r s This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again - beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of usefs indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Silurian of Central Kentucky, U.S.A.: Stratigraphy, Palaeoenvironments and Palaeoecology
    The Silurian of central Kentucky, U.S.A.: Stratigraphy, palaeoenvironments and palaeoecology FRANK R. ETTENSOHN, R. THOMAS LIERMAN, CHARLES E. MASON, WILLIAM M. ANDREWS, R. TODD HENDRICKS, DANIEL J. PHELPS & LAWRENCE A. GORDON ETTENSOHN, F.R., LIERMAN, R.T., MASON, C.E., ANDREWS, W.M., HENDRICKS, R.T., PHELPS, D.J. & GORDON, L.A., 2013:04:26. The Silurian of central Kentucky, U.S.A.: Stratigraphy, palaeoenvironments and palaeoecology. Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists 44, 159-189. ISSN 0810-8889. Silurian rocks in Kentucky are exposed on the eastern and western flanks of the Cincinnati Arch, a large-wavelength cratonic structure separating the Appalachian foreland basin from the intracratonic Illinois Basin. The Cincinnati Arch area experienced uplift during latest Ordovician-early Silurian time, so that the exposed Silurian section is relatively thin due to onlap and post- Silurian erosional truncation on the arch. On both flanks of the arch, dolomitic carbonates predominate, but the section on the eastern side reflects a more shale-rich ramp that faced eastern Appalachian source areas. In the Silurian section on the western side of the arch, which apparently developed across a platform-like isolation-accommodation zone, shales are rare except dur- ing some highstand episodes, and rocks in the area reflect deposition across a broad, low-gradient shelf area, interrupted by structurally controlled topographic breaks. Using the progression of interpreted depositional environments and nearshore faunal communities, a relative sea-level curve, which parallels those of previous workers, was generated for the section in Kentucky. While the curve clearly shows the influence of glacial eustasy, distinct indications of the far-field, flexural influence of Taconian and Salinic tectonism are also present.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Thirty-First Annual Field Conference of the Section of Geology Combined with the Sections of Plant Science and Conservation of the Ohio Academy of Science
    GUIDE TO THIRTY-FIRST ANNUAL FIELD CONFERENCE OF THE SECTION OF GEOLOGY COMBINED WITH THE SECTIONS OF PLANT SCIENCE AND CONSERVATION OF THE OHIO ACADEMY OF SCIENCE APRIL 213 1956 THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT OF THE SPRINGFIELD AREA CHAIRMEN OF SECTIONS TOUR COMMITTEE Lee Walp, Plant Science Floyd Nave E. S. Thomas Robert Finlay, Conservation kenneth Hunt George Burns John Melvin, Geology John Lounsbury Daniel R. Atzenhoefer £. T. Bodenberg C. N. Savage K, * GEOLCGIC COLUMN The f-ilcwi:i£ chart sh ws that part ..if the gecl-gic column of Ohio that might be expected in Clark County and adjacent ;.:rtions of Greene and Champaign Counties. THICKNESS SYSTEM GROUP FORMATION DESCRIPTION fFe pt) Ground and end moraine, outwash, kames, Mid.die Wisconsin- drift 0 to 60 and valley-train deposit's PIe i stoce ne Quaternary Early Wisconsin drift Extensive gravel outwash and kames 5 to 200 series Mostly fine sand filling buried valleys. Pre-Wiscons in drift 0 to 400 Perhaps some till. Cedarville dolomite Massive, porous, dolomitic limestone 5 to 150? Springfield dolomite Thin-bedded and dense 10 to 15 Euphemia dolomite Massive and porous 6 to 8 S ilur ian Nia garan Massie shale Calcareous and dense 4 to 5 Laurel dolomite Thin-bedded and dense 5 Os go od shale Calcareous with limestone beds 20 to 25 Dayton. 1 inaestone Thin-bedded and dense 6 to 8 Beds of Cli nton Fossilif erous, massive to irregularly Brassfield limestone 30 a ge be dde d Shale, soft, calcareous, interbedded with Richmond, and O rdovi c ia n thin hard limestone layers; called the 1 yOCO-f M aysville Cincinnati shale in old reports GO S H EN :-7-\-~\\~i '5cge — OAYUGAN, -- - " "~ — ^.
    [Show full text]
  • View of Pa Element, OSU 41751, X 28, Collection
    INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photo­ graph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the original text directly from the copy submitted. Thus, some dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from a computer printer. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyrighted material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are re­ produced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is available as one exposure on a standard 35 mm slide or as a 17" x 23" black and white photographic print for an additional charge. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. 35 mm slides or 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Accessing theUMI World’s Information since 1938 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA Order Number 8820S06 Taxonomy and biostratigraphic significance of Wenlockian and Ludlovian (Silurian) conodonts in the midcontinent outcrop area, North America Kleffner, Mark Alan, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1988 UMI 300 N. Zeeb Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48106 PLEASE NOTE: In all cases this material has been filmed in the best possible way from the available copy.
    [Show full text]
  • Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups
    APPENDIX Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups Important fossil taxa are listed down to the lowest practical taxonomic level; in most cases, this will be the ordinal or subordinallevel. Abbreviated stratigraphic units in parentheses (e.g., UCamb-Ree) indicate maximum range known for the group; units followed by question marks are isolated occurrences followed generally by an interval with no known representatives. Taxa with ranges to "Ree" are extant. Data are extracted principally from Harland et al. (1967), Moore et al. (1956 et seq.), Sepkoski (1982), Romer (1966), Colbert (1980), Moy-Thomas and Miles (1971), Taylor (1981), and Brasier (1980). KINGDOM MONERA Class Ciliata (cont.) Order Spirotrichia (Tintinnida) (UOrd-Rec) DIVISION CYANOPHYTA ?Class [mertae sedis Order Chitinozoa (Proterozoic?, LOrd-UDev) Class Cyanophyceae Class Actinopoda Order Chroococcales (Archean-Rec) Subclass Radiolaria Order Nostocales (Archean-Ree) Order Polycystina Order Spongiostromales (Archean-Ree) Suborder Spumellaria (MCamb-Rec) Order Stigonematales (LDev-Rec) Suborder Nasselaria (Dev-Ree) Three minor orders KINGDOM ANIMALIA KINGDOM PROTISTA PHYLUM PORIFERA PHYLUM PROTOZOA Class Hexactinellida Order Amphidiscophora (Miss-Ree) Class Rhizopodea Order Hexactinosida (MTrias-Rec) Order Foraminiferida* Order Lyssacinosida (LCamb-Rec) Suborder Allogromiina (UCamb-Ree) Order Lychniscosida (UTrias-Rec) Suborder Textulariina (LCamb-Ree) Class Demospongia Suborder Fusulinina (Ord-Perm) Order Monaxonida (MCamb-Ree) Suborder Miliolina (Sil-Ree) Order Lithistida
    [Show full text]
  • Quarry Model Review, Terran Corporation, 5-15-17
    P a g e | 1 Terran Corporation Environmental Services Mr. Lanny E. Erdos, Chief May 15, 2017 Division of Mineral Resources Management 2045 Morse Road, Building H-2 Columbus, Ohio 43229-6693 RE: Initial review of report: “Evaluation of Groundwater Impacts, Dewatering of Proposed Enon Quarry, Clark County, Ohio” Dear Chief Erdos; At the request of Mad River Township Trustees and the Village of Enon, Terran Corporation hydrogeologists have completed their initial review of the 2016 groundwater modeling report referenced above prepared by Eagon & Associates, Inc. (EAI). This report and accompanying Hydrology Information Data package was developed as part of the Industrial Minerals Permit No. IM-340 submission requirements (OAC 1501:14-5- 01(A) and (B) for development of Enon Sand & Gravel II Quarry in Mad River Township. Although not strictly adhering to the reporting requirements set forth in OAC 1501:14-5- 01, EAI submission included a presentation of some available information relative to local subsurface conditions but mainly focused on regional hydrogeology and geology settings. A computer model was constructed attempting to estimate the effects of quarry dewatering on groundwater levels in the vicinity of the proposed quarry pits. Absent from this model exercise was a supportable estimation of effects of the quarry operation on ground-water quality and supply to existing wells. Also absent was assessment of quarry dewatering operations on surface water flow regimes, specifically streams, springs and wetlands (fens) or the effects of operational blasting on the regional groundwater system. The primary submission of this data package was a regional groundwater flow model constructed by EAI using modified MODFLOW 2000 software.
    [Show full text]
  • Sectional Meetings Details of Technical Meetings Follow
    Sectional Meetings Details of technical meetings follow. See map for building locations. Bus- iness meetings are scheduled for each section. An important item of business is the election of officers. A. ZOOLOGY MORNING SESSION 1 KAUKE HALL F. LEE ST. JOHN, PRESIDING EFFECTS OF CALCIUM MODULATING DRUGS ON INSECT CENTRAL NERVOUS TISSUE. Kevin M. Hoffman & George F. Shambaugh, Department of Entomology, Ohio Agricultural Research & Development CEnter, Wooster, OHIO 44691 9:00 Drugs which modulate the movements of calcium ions into or within cells were perfused over the desheathed, last abdominal ganglion of the cockroach, Nauphoeta cinerea (Olivier). Synaptic transmission, endogenous spike activity, summed post-synaptic potentials and ganglionic polarization were measured. Sodium nitroprusside in low concentrations caused repetitive firing of giant interneurons after faradic stimulation. CONNECTIONS BETWEEN THE NUCLEUS BASALIS AND THE ARCHISTRIATUM IN THE MALLARD. Patrick Work, Department of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242. 9:15 Research reported here is part of a study of the feeding mechanism of the mallard duck (Anas platyrhynchos) which is being conducted at the University of Leiden in the Netherlands. It was done through a Kent State University-Leiden University student exchange program in the summer of 1980. The research consisted of a neuroanatomical and histochemical investigation of the relationship between the forebrain nuclei basalis and archistriatum anterior. These are believed to be important elements in neural control of the feeding mecha- nism in the duck. Anatomical connections between these nuclei were studied with the aid of horseradish peroxidase injected into the archistriatum anterior nucleus, Peroxidase-labeled cells were found only in the most medial portions of the nucleus basalis from the level of the posterior commissure to the rostral border of the archistriatum anterior.
    [Show full text]
  • Geotechnical Report
    Geotechnical Exploration Report The Freese Center State Route 598 Galion, Ohio 44833 Prepared for Galion Port Authority P.O. Box 761 Galion, Ohio 44833 Daniel E Karch, E.I. Project Manager Prepared by Professional Service Industries, Inc. 4960 Vulcan Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43228 Paul S. Hundley, P.E. July 31, 2020 Geotechnical Dept. Manager/Principal Consultant PSI Project No. 01021746 PSI Project Number: 01021746 The Freese Center July 21, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 PROJECT INFORMATION ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PROJECT AUTHORIZATION ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES ................................................................................................. 2 2 SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .................................................................................................... 4 2.1 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................. 4 2.2 SITE GEOLOGY .................................................................................................................................. 4 2.3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • North American Geology
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Bulletin 684 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF NORTH AMERICAN GEOLOGY FOB 1917 WITH SUBJECT INDEX BY JOHN M. NICKLES i WASHINGTON.' GOVEENMENT PHINTING OFFICE 191 5 CONTENTS. Introduction................................................................. 3 Serials examined........................................................... 5 Bibliography............................................................... 9 Outline of subject headinga................................................. 89 Index.................................................................... 93 Lists..................................................................... 135 Chemical analyses...................................................... 135 Minerals described..................................................... 136 Rocks described.. '...................................................... 138 Geologic formations described........................................... 139 2 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF NORTH AMERICAN GEOLOGY FOR 1917, WITH SUBJECT INDEX. By JOHN M. NICKLES. INTRODUCTION. The bibliography of North American geology, including paleon­ tology, petrology, and mineralogy, for the year 1917 follows the plan and arrangement of its immediate predecessors. It includes publications bearing on the geology of the Continent of North America and adjoining islands; also Panama and the Hawaiian Islands. Papers by American writers on the geology of other parts of the world are not included.
    [Show full text]