DOCSLIB.ORG

Boedijn Hague Sarcosoma, the Type Species S. Globosum Is Still

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Boedijn Hague Sarcosoma, the Type Species S. Globosum Is Still PERSOONIA Published by the Rijksherbarium, Leiden Volume Part i, i, pp. 7-9 (1959) Notes on the genus Sarcosoma K.B. Boedijn The Hague forward show that Nannf. & In this paper arguments are put to Galiella Korf is in different from Sarcosoma no way Casp. the the the has the fructifications. In subclass of Discomycetes, genus Sarcosoma largest The of Sarcosoma reach width of and of cm. cups globosum may a 10.5 cm a height 7.5 also known Bessey (1), it is true, mentioned on page 196 a Peziza cacabus, as feet with the Geopyxis cacabus (Fr.) Sacc., which shows a fruiting structure 3 tall, inches and inches and the 16 inches and inches cup 20 high 25 wide, stipe high 3 described thick. In passing it may be pointed out that this species was not by Fries but of whose could be studied by Ljungh (11) instead, a photocopy paper through the kindness of Dr. M. A. Donk. From this it is obvious that Peziza cacabus surely not a the Sundanese word kakabu is . The ‘cacabus’ Peziza specific epithet suggests , kakabu' the used in West for of Calvatia.< Calvatia 'supa being name Java any species gigantea (Pers.) Lloyd is not rare in Java, but this species, although growing very large, does not fit the description. The plate accompanying the original paper shows an inverted bell-shaped structure provided with a rather long stipe. Although to it is impossible arrive at a satisfactory identificationwithout studying the original would material, I suggest that the specimen depicted is no fungus, not even a plant, but the Poterion instead. This cup-shaped sponge pateri (Hardwicke) species neatly agrees with both description and picture. Returning to the genus Sarcosoma, the type species S. globosum is still unchallenged in its of the known This described in position largest cup fungus. species was 1797 by Schmidel as Burcardia globosa. Fries, however, did not admit this genus, and transferred the his where it with such species to genus Bulgaria, was placed together other B. which is Whereas Seaver the species as inquinans an inoperculate. (12) uses generic name Bulgaria to accomodate the operculate, and Phaeobulgaria for the inoperculate species, most recent authors, like Korf (6), prefer Sarcosoma for the operculate species. In a second paper this author (7), in collaboration with Nann- feldt, creates a new genus Galiella Nannf. & Korf for four of the species out of the Galiella Nannf. & Korf the previous genus, indicating rufa (Schw.) as type species. The three remaining species are G. javanica (Rehm) Nannf. & Korf, G. thwaitesii (Berk. & Br.) Nannf., and G. celebica (Henn.) Nannf. It is not clear why Sarcosoma orientale Pat. not in the was incorporated new genus. On carefully reading the generic diagnosis of Galiella, it appears that it fits all species of Sarcosomawith the exception ofS. globosum, ofwhich it must be admitted that 7 Persoonia Vol. Part 8 i, i, 1959 smooth it be that in the Sarcosoma it has spores. However, may pointed out genus series of without and with a continuous species variously developed spore orna- mentations may be found: smooth spores are found in S. globosum, moderately S. and S. whilst the developed spore ornamentation occurs in javanicum celebicum, coarsest markings are to be found in S. thwaitesii and S. orientale. According to Korf, Galiella would differ from Sarcosoma, first, in the callose- of the in the smaller which pectic markings spore-wall and, secondly, apothecia are said to contain no gelatinous fluid. As to the spore markings, it has been shown above that these are absent only in S. globosum. With regard to the size of the apothecia, this character cannot be accepted as of value. There which include with both being generic are numerous genera species small and large fructifications. Moreover, most species of Galiella are nearly as is about large as Sarcosoma globosum. The type species Galiella rufa, for one, 5 cm diameter Seaver's G. diameterand in according to Plate 56 (12); javanica is 4-8 cm in up to 5.5 cm high; G. celebica is 2—6.5 cm in diameter and 1-3.5 cm high. These are measurements from collections made in Indonesia which often consisted ofa few I convinced that when materialbecomes specimens only. am, however, more available, still larger apothecia will be found. Finally, as far as the third character mentionedby Korf is concerned, it is certainly not true that all species of Galiella lack a layer ofliquid. Fresh specimens ofG. javanica and G. celebica known of when are to squirt a jet gelatinous liquid squeezed, as I often had the opportunity to observe. the differences between Sarcosoma and Galiella Thus, as alleged prove unsupported, Galiella is a superfluous name and must be rejected. LITERATURE 1. E. A. and of BESSEY, 1950. Morphology Taxonomy Fungi. K. B. The Sarcosoma in Netherlands Indies. In Bull. bot. 2. BOEDIJN, 1932. genus Jard. Buitenzorg, ser. 3, 12: 273-279, 1 fig. Bull. 3. 1940. The Mycetozoa, Fungi and Lichenes of the Krakatau Group. In Jard. 16 bot. Buitenzorg, ser. 3, (4): 366. E. 4. FRIES, 1822. Systema mycologicum 2 (1). Lundae. R. la Rev. 5. HEIM, 1958. Propos sur nomenclature. In Mycol. 23: 127-135. 6. KAVINA, K. 1928. Contribution a l'etude de la biologie et la morphologie du Sarcosoma Rehm. In 6: globosum (Schm.) Mykologia. 105-113. 7. KORF, R. P. 1957. Nomenclatural Notes. II. On Bulgaria, Phaeobulgaria and Sarcosoma. In Mycologia 49: 102-106. 8. Two In 1957- Bulgarioid genera: Galiella and Plectania. Mycologia 49: 107—m. N. G. Zur Kenntnis der Fr. 9. LAGERHEIM, 1903. Bulgaria globosa (Schmid.) ( Sarcosoma globosum et S. In Bot. platydiscus auct.). Not. 249-267, 1 fig., t pi. Boedijn: Sarco.wma 9 LE M. Observations Sarcosoma orientale Pat. Sarcosoma to. GAI., 1951. sur et rufum (Schw.) Rehm. In Bull. Soc. France mycol. 47: 101-106, 3 fig. Rev. 11. '958. Petitepromenade a travers le maquis de la nomenclature.In Mycol. 23: 121-126. S. I. Cacabus och frSn In Svcnsk 12. LJUNGH, 1804. Peziza en ny besynnerlig svamp Java. VetAkad. Handl. nya 25: 39-41, 1 pi. F. The North 13. SEAVER, J. 1942. American Cup Fungi (Operculates), Supplemented edition, 194-198, fig. 2; 318-320, pi. 56-57..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Museum, University of Bergen, Norway for Accepting The
    PERSOONIA Published by the Rijksherbarium, Leiden Volume Part 6, 4, pp. 439-443 (1972) The Suboperculate ascus—a review Finn-Egil Eckblad Botanical Museum, University of Bergen, Norway The suboperculate nature of the asci of the Sarcoscyphaceae is discussed, that it does in its and further and it is concluded not exist original sense, that the Sarcoscyphaceae is not closely related to the Sclerotiniaceae. The question of the precise nature ofthe ascus in the Sarcoscyphaceae is important in connection with the of the the The treatment taxonomy of Discomycetes. family has been established the Sarcoscyphaceae as a highranking taxon, Suboperculati, by Le Gal (1946b, 1999), on the basis of its asci being suboperculate. Furthermore, the Suboperculati has beenregarded as intermediatebetween the rest of the Operculati, The Pezizales, and the Inoperculati, especially the order Helotiales, and its family Sclerotiniaceae (Le Gal, 1993). Recent views on the taxonomie position of the Sarcoscyphaceae are given by Rifai ( 1968 ), Eckblad ( ig68 ), Arpin (ig68 ), Kim- brough (1970) and Korf (igyi). The Suboperculati were regarded by Le Gal (1946a, b) as intermediates because had both the beneath they operculum of the Operculati, and in addition, it, some- ofthe of the In the the thing pore structure Inoperculati. Suboperculati pore struc- to ture is said take the form of an apical chamberwith an internal, often incomplete within Note this ring-like structure it. that in case the spores on discharge have to travers a double hindrance, the internal ring and the circular opening, and that the diameters of these obstacles are both smaller than the smallest diameterof the spores.
    [Show full text]
  • Chorioactidaceae: a New Family in the Pezizales (Ascomycota) with Four Genera
    mycological research 112 (2008) 513–527 journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mycres Chorioactidaceae: a new family in the Pezizales (Ascomycota) with four genera Donald H. PFISTER*, Caroline SLATER, Karen HANSENy Harvard University Herbaria – Farlow Herbarium of Cryptogamic Botany, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 22 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA article info abstract Article history: Molecular phylogenetic and comparative morphological studies provide evidence for the Received 15 June 2007 recognition of a new family, Chorioactidaceae, in the Pezizales. Four genera are placed in Received in revised form the family: Chorioactis, Desmazierella, Neournula, and Wolfina. Based on parsimony, like- 1 November 2007 lihood, and Bayesian analyses of LSU, SSU, and RPB2 sequence data, Chorioactidaceae repre- Accepted 29 November 2007 sents a sister clade to the Sarcosomataceae, to which some of these taxa were previously Corresponding Editor: referred. Morphologically these genera are similar in pigmentation, excipular construction, H. Thorsten Lumbsch and asci, which mostly have terminal opercula and rounded, sometimes forked, bases without croziers. Ascospores have cyanophilic walls or cyanophilic surface ornamentation Keywords: in the form of ridges or warts. So far as is known the ascospores and the cells of the LSU paraphyses of all species are multinucleate. The six species recognized in these four genera RPB2 all have limited geographical distributions in the northern hemisphere. Sarcoscyphaceae ª 2007 The British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Sarcosomataceae SSU Introduction indicated a relationship of these taxa to the Sarcosomataceae and discussed the group as the Chorioactis clade. Only six spe- The Pezizales, operculate cup-fungi, have been put on rela- cies are assigned to these genera, most of which are infre- tively stable phylogenetic footing as summarized by Hansen quently collected.
    [Show full text]
  • ASCOSPORES DE L' URNULA HELVELLOIDES DONADINI, BERTHET Et ASTIER ET LES CONCEPTS D'asque SUBOPERCULÉ ET DE SARCOSOMATACEAE(L)
    Cryptogamie, Mycol. 1990, Il (3): 203-238 203 L'ÉTUDE ULTRASTRUCTURALE DES ASQUES ET DES ASCOSPORES DE L' URNULA HELVELLOIDES DONADINI, BERTHET et ASTIER ET LES CONCEPTS D'ASQUE SUBOPERCULÉ ET DE SARCOSOMATACEAE(l) A. BELLEMÈRE*, M.C. MALHERBE*, H. CHACUN* et L.M. MELÉNDEZ-HOWELL** * Laboratoire de Mycologie, ENS Lyon, Services de Saint-Cloud, F-92211 Saint-Cloud Cedex, France. ** CNRS. Laboratoire de Cryptogamie d.u MuséMm d'Histoire Naturelle, 12 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France. RÉSUMÉ - Le sub-opercule (ou sous-opercule) de l'asque est considéré ici comme la partie périoperculaire d'une différenciation persistante qui, dans la couche d, épaissie, de la paroi apicale de l'asque, affecte la sous-couche d2. Les genres de Pézizales à asques suboperculés rangés jusqu'ici dans la famille des Sarcosomataceae (sensu Kobayasi) sont placés dans la famille des Sarcoscyphaceae Le Gal ex Eckblad, amendée en ce sens, et conservée dans les Pézizales. Les asques du genre type de la famille des Sarcosomataceae, Sarcosoma, ainsi que ceux des genres Urnula et Plectania ne sont pas suboperculés car l'épaisissement apical de la couche d de leur paroi n'est pas subdivisé en deux sous-couches. La définition de cette famille doit donc aussi être amendée. L' Urnula helvelloides Donadini, Berthet et Astier a des asques operculés, dont, à l'apex, la couche d est non seulement épaissie mais subdivisée en deux sous-couches dl et d 2, comme chez le genre Plectania, dont il diffère cependant par ailleurs. Il est donc placé dans le genre nouveau Donadinia Bellemère et Meléndez-Howell.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliotheksliste-Aarau-Dezember 2016
    Bibliotheksverzeichnis VSVP + Nur im Leesesaal verfügbar, * Dissert. Signatur Autor Titel Jahrgang AKB Myc 1 Ricken Vademecum für Pilzfreunde. 2. Auflage 1920 2 Gramberg Pilze der Heimat 2 Bände 1921 3 Michael Führer für Pilzfreunde, Ausgabe B, 3 Bände 1917 3 b Michael / Schulz Führer für Pilzfreunde. 3 Bände 1927 3 Michael Führer für Pilzfreunde. 3 Bände 1918-1919 4 Dumée Nouvel atlas de poche des champignons. 2 Bände 1921 5 Maublanc Les champignons comestibles et vénéneux. 2 Bände 1926-1927 6 Negri Atlante dei principali funghi comestibili e velenosi 1908 7 Jacottet Les champignons dans la nature 1925 8 Hahn Der Pilzsammler 1903 9 Rolland Atlas des champignons de France, Suisse et Belgique 1910 10 Crawshay The spore ornamentation of the Russulas 1930 11 Cooke Handbook of British fungi. Vol. 1,2. 1871 12/ 1,1 Winter Die Pilze Deutschlands, Oesterreichs und der Schweiz.1. 1884 12/ 1,5 Fischer, E. Die Pilze Deutschlands, Oesterreichs und der Schweiz. Abt. 5 1897 13 Migula Kryptogamenflora von Deutschland, Oesterreich und der Schweiz 1913 14 Secretan Mycographie suisse. 3 vol. 1833 15 Bourdot / Galzin Hymenomycètes de France (doppelt) 1927 16 Bigeard / Guillemin Flore des champignons supérieurs de France. 2 Bände. 1913 17 Wuensche Die Pilze. Anleitung zur Kenntnis derselben 1877 18 Lenz Die nützlichen und schädlichen Schwämme 1840 19 Constantin / Dufour Nouvelle flore des champignons de France 1921 20 Ricken Die Blätterpilze Deutschlands und der angr. Länder. 2 Bände 1915 21 Constantin / Dufour Petite flore des champignons comestibles et vénéneux 1895 22 Quélet Les champignons du Jura et des Vosges. P.1-3+Suppl.
    [Show full text]
  • 9B Taxonomy to Genus
    Fungus and Lichen Genera in the NEMF Database Taxonomic hierarchy: phyllum > class (-etes) > order (-ales) > family (-ceae) > genus. Total number of genera in the database: 526 Anamorphic fungi (see p. 4), which are disseminated by propagules not formed from cells where meiosis has occurred, are presently not grouped by class, order, etc. Most propagules can be referred to as "conidia," but some are derived from unspecialized vegetative mycelium. A significant number are correlated with fungal states that produce spores derived from cells where meiosis has, or is assumed to have, occurred. These are, where known, members of the ascomycetes or basidiomycetes. However, in many cases, they are still undescribed, unrecognized or poorly known. (Explanation paraphrased from "Dictionary of the Fungi, 9th Edition.") Principal authority for this taxonomy is the Dictionary of the Fungi and its online database, www.indexfungorum.org. For lichens, see Lecanoromycetes on p. 3. Basidiomycota Aegerita Poria Macrolepiota Grandinia Poronidulus Melanophyllum Agaricomycetes Hyphoderma Postia Amanitaceae Cantharellales Meripilaceae Pycnoporellus Amanita Cantharellaceae Abortiporus Skeletocutis Bolbitiaceae Cantharellus Antrodia Trichaptum Agrocybe Craterellus Grifola Tyromyces Bolbitius Clavulinaceae Meripilus Sistotremataceae Conocybe Clavulina Physisporinus Trechispora Hebeloma Hydnaceae Meruliaceae Sparassidaceae Panaeolina Hydnum Climacodon Sparassis Clavariaceae Polyporales Gloeoporus Steccherinaceae Clavaria Albatrellaceae Hyphodermopsis Antrodiella
    [Show full text]
  • The Phylogeny of Plant and Animal Pathogens in the Ascomycota
    Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology (2001) 59, 165±187 doi:10.1006/pmpp.2001.0355, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on MINI-REVIEW The phylogeny of plant and animal pathogens in the Ascomycota MARY L. BERBEE* Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada (Accepted for publication August 2001) What makes a fungus pathogenic? In this review, phylogenetic inference is used to speculate on the evolution of plant and animal pathogens in the fungal Phylum Ascomycota. A phylogeny is presented using 297 18S ribosomal DNA sequences from GenBank and it is shown that most known plant pathogens are concentrated in four classes in the Ascomycota. Animal pathogens are also concentrated, but in two ascomycete classes that contain few, if any, plant pathogens. Rather than appearing as a constant character of a class, the ability to cause disease in plants and animals was gained and lost repeatedly. The genes that code for some traits involved in pathogenicity or virulence have been cloned and characterized, and so the evolutionary relationships of a few of the genes for enzymes and toxins known to play roles in diseases were explored. In general, these genes are too narrowly distributed and too recent in origin to explain the broad patterns of origin of pathogens. Co-evolution could potentially be part of an explanation for phylogenetic patterns of pathogenesis. Robust phylogenies not only of the fungi, but also of host plants and animals are becoming available, allowing for critical analysis of the nature of co-evolutionary warfare. Host animals, particularly human hosts have had little obvious eect on fungal evolution and most cases of fungal disease in humans appear to represent an evolutionary dead end for the fungus.
    [Show full text]
  • (With (Otidiaceae). Annellospores, The
    PERSOONIA Published by the Rijksherbarium, Leiden Volume Part 6, 4, pp. 405-414 (1972) Imperfect states and the taxonomy of the Pezizales J.W. Paden Department of Biology, University of Victoria Victoria, B. C., Canada (With Plates 20-22) Certainly only a relatively few species of the Pezizales have been studied in culture. I that this will efforts in this direction. hope paper stimulatemore A few patterns are emerging from those species that have been cultured and have produced conidia but more information is needed. Botryoblasto- and found in cultures of spores ( Oedocephalum Ostracoderma) are frequently Peziza and Iodophanus (Pezizaceae). Aleurospores are known in Peziza but also in other like known in genera. Botrytis- imperfect states are Trichophaea (Otidiaceae). Sympodulosporous imperfect states are known in several families (Sarcoscyphaceae, Sarcosomataceae, Aleuriaceae, Morchellaceae) embracing both suborders. Conoplea is definitely tied in with Urnula and Plectania, Nodulosporium with Geopyxis, and Costantinella with Morchella. Certain types of conidia are not presently known in the Pezizales. Phialo- and few other have spores, porospores, annellospores, blastospores a types not been reported. The absence of phialospores is of special interest since these are common in the Helotiales. The absence of conidia in certain e. Helvellaceae and Theleboleaceae also be of groups, g. may significance, and would aid in delimiting these taxa. At the species level critical com- of taxonomic and parison imperfect states may help clarify problems supplement other data in distinguishing between closely related species. Plectania and of where such Peziza, perhaps Sarcoscypha are examples genera studies valuable. might prove One of the Pezizales in need of in culture large group desparate study are the few of these have been cultured.
    [Show full text]
  • Ascomycete Fungi Species List
    Ascomycete Fungi Species List Higher Classification1 Kingdom: Fungi, Phylum: Ascomycota Class (C:), Order (O:) and Family (F:) Scientific Name1 English Name(s)2 C: Geoglossomycetes (Earth Tongues) O: Geoglossales F: Geoglossaceae Trichoglossum hirsutum Black Earth Tongue C: Leotiomycetes O: Helotiales F: Bulgariaceae Bulgaria inquinans Black Bulgar F: Helotiaceae Chlorociboria aeruginascens Green Elfcup, Green Wood Cup, Green Stain Fungus F: Leotiaceae Leotia lubrica Jellybaby F: Vibrisseaceae Vibrissea truncorum O: Pezizales F: Helvellaceae Gyromitra infula Hooded False Morel, Elfin Saddle Helvella macropus Felt Saddle Fungus Helvella spp. Elfin Saddles F: Pyronemataceae Cheilymenia theleboloides Scutellinia scutellata Eyelash Cup F: Sarcoscyphaceae Cookeina speciosa Cookeina venezuelae C: Sordariomycetes O: Hypocreales F: Clavicipitaceae Ophiocordyceps melolonthae O: Xylariales F: Xylariaceae Daldinia sp. Xylaria globosa Xylaria hypoxylon Candlestick Fungus, Candlesnuff Fungus, Stag's Horn Fungus Xylaria polymorpha Dead Man's Fingers Xylaria spp. Xylocoremium sp. Page 1 of 2 Cloudbridge Nature Reserve, Costa Rica Last Updated: February 3, 2017 Ascomycete Fungi Species List NOTES: Short-forms: sp. = one species of the given genus identified; spp. = more than one of species of the given genus identified 1, Classification and scientific names based on current classifications as found on MycoBank (www.mycobank.org) 2, English names are not standardized for fungi and the English names provided are not considered the definitive names for the given species. English names were gathered from a variety of sources including mushroom identification books and various fungi related websites. Contributors: Major Contributor – Baptiste Saunier. Other Contributors – Ranzeth Gómez Navarro. Page 2 of 2 Cloudbridge Nature Reserve, Costa Rica Last Updated: February 3, 2017 .
    [Show full text]
  • Morchella Exuberans – Ny Murkla För Sverige
    Svensk Mykologisk Tidskrift Volym 36 · nummer 3 · 2015 Svensk Mykologisk Tidskrift 1J@C%RV`:` 1R1$:`7 www.svampar.se 0VJ@7@QCQ$1@/ Sveriges Mykologiska Förening /VJ]%GC1HV`:`Q`1$1J:C:` 1@C:`IVR0:I]R Föreningen verkar för :J@J7 J1J$QH.IVR0VJ@ QH.JQ`RV%`Q]V1@ R VJ G?`V @?JJVRQI QI 0V`1$V 0:I]:` QH. 1J `VV8/VJ% @QIIV`IVR`7`:J%IIV` 0:I]:``QCC1J: %`VJ ]V`B`QH.?$:00V`1$V7@QCQ$1@:DV`VJ1J$8 R@7RR:0J: %`VJQH.:0:I]]CQH@J1J$QH.- 9 `%@ 1QJV` 1CC`V``: :`V`1JJ]BD7.VI1R: J: %]] `?R:JRV1@Q$QH.I:`@@V`%JRV`1:@ - 11180:I]:`8V8/VJV`.BCC$VJQI- :$:JRV:0$?CC:JRVC:$:` CVI@:] 1 D8/VJ ``:I ?CC IVR G1R`:$ R : @QJ :@ V` IVCC:J CQ@:C: 0:I]`V`VJ1J$:` QH. ``BJ/Q`V<: .Q` I1JJV`QJR8 0:I]1J `VV`:RV1C:JRV %JRV`C?: R:@QJ :@ %]]`?.BCCIVRI7@QCQ$1@:`V`- $:`1$`:JJC?JRV` R VJ :I0V`@:J IVR I7@QCQ$1@ `Q`@J1J$ QH. Redaktion 0V VJ@:]8 JVR:@ V`QH.:J0:`1$% $10:`V 1@:VCKQJ VRCVI@:]V`.BCCV$VJQI1J?J1J$:0IVRCVIR LH=: :J :0 VJ]B`V`VJ1J$VJG:J@$1`Q /JNLLHO//;< 5388-7733 =0:I]:`8V VRCVI:0 VJ` 7 [ 7`V`IVRCVII:`GQ::10V`1$V H=AQJVGQ`$ [ 7`V`IVRCVII:`GQ::% :J`V`0V`1$V G:`J: :`0V [ 7 `V` %RV`:JRVIVRCVII:`GQ::1 6: .:II:`01@ 0V`1$^6 _ VC8 [ 7 `V``=^=/_ =8H`QJVGQ`QI %GH`1]``QI:G`Q:R:`V1VCHQIV82:7IVJ Jan Nilsson `Q` ^46 _H:JGVI:RVG7H`VR1 H:`RG7 IVGV`$ 01Q%`1VG.Q]: 11180:I]:`8VQ` QQ%` :LL;J4< G:J@:HHQ%J7 =$8V 9:;<74 :9AL9D/74E4 Äldre nummer :00VJ@7@QCQ$1@/^ KNJE/KOJ<;<_`1JJ]BVJAEQI@:JGV ?CC: Sveriges Mykologiska Förening ``BJD8 9=V VJ@:] Previous issues Q` 0VJ@ 7@QCQ$1@ / ^KNJE/KOJ<;<_:`V:0:1C:GCVQJ:AE1 GVGQ`$%J10V`1 V H:JGVQ`RV`VR``QID8 :6 GVGQ`$ 11180:I]:`8V Omslagsbild 2:]V$=:6^C1Q].Q`%]1:H1J%_DQ H_ 8 I detta nummer nr 3 2015 *_77`J`7 SMF 2 Kompakt taggsvamp (Hydnellum compac- B`0]%]IG$ tum_ŽJB$`: :J@:`QIRVV@.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Distinguish Amanita Smithiana from Matsutake and Catathelasma Species
    VOLUME 57: 1 JANUARY-FEBRUARY 2017 www.namyco.org How to Distinguish Amanita smithiana from Matsutake and Catathelasma species By Michael W. Beug: Chair, NAMA Toxicology Committee A recent rash of mushroom poisonings involving liver failure in Oregon prompted Michael Beug to issue the following photos and information on distinguishing the differences between the toxic Amanita smithiana and edible Matsutake and Catathelasma. Distinguishing the choice edible Amanita smithiana Amanita smithiana Matsutake (Tricholoma magnivelare) from the highly poisonous Amanita smithiana is best done by laying the stipe (stem) of the mushroom in the palm of your hand and then squeezing down on the stipe with your thumb, applying as much pressure as you can. Amanita smithiana is very firm but if you squeeze hard, the stipe will shatter. Matsutake The stipe of the Matsutake is much denser and will not shatter (unless it is riddled with insect larvae and is no longer in good edible condition). There are other important differences. The flesh of Matsutake peels or shreds like string cheese. Also, the stipe of the Matsutake is widest near the gills Matsutake and tapers gradually to a point while the stipe of Amanita smithiana tends to be bulbous and is usually widest right at ground level. The partial veil and ring of a Matsutake is membranous while the partial veil and ring of Amanita smithiana is powdery and readily flocculates into small pieces (often disappearing entirely). For most people the difference in odor is very distinctive. Most collections of Amanita smithiana have a bleach-like odor while Matsutake has a distinctive smell of old gym socks and cinnamon redhots (however, not all people can distinguish the odors).
    [Show full text]
  • JMI Jurnal Mikologi Indonesia Online ISSN: 2579-8766 Trichaleurina Javanica from West Java
    JuJurnrnalaMl MikiokolologigIinInddoonneseisaiaVVool 4l 2NNoo21(2(2002108):)1: 4795-51581 AvaAivlaabillaebolenloinelinaet:awt:wwww.jwm.im.mikiokoininaa.o.or.ri.did JMI Jurnal Mikologi Indonesia Online ISSN: 2579-8766 Trichaleurina javanica from West Java Rudy Hermawan1, Mega Putri Amelya1, Za'Aziza Ridha Julia1 1Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, IPB University, Dramaga Campus, Bogor 16680, Indonesia. Hermawan R, Amelya MP, Julia ZR. 2020 - Trichaleurina javanica from West Java. Jurnal Mikologi Indonesia 4(2), 175-181. doi:10.46638/jmi.v4i2.85 Abstract Trichaleurina is a fleshy mushroom with goblet-shaped within Pezizales. Many genera have a morphology similar to Trichaleurina, such as Bulgaria and Galiella. Some previous reports had been described fungi like Trichaleurina as Sarcosoma. Indonesia has been reported that has Trichaleurina specimen (the new name of Sarcosoma) by Boedijn. This research aimed to obtain, characterize, and determine the Trichaleurina around IPB University. Field exploration for fungal samples was used in the Landscape Arboretum of IPB University. Ascomata of Trichaleurina were collected, observed, and preserved using FAA. The specimen was deposited into Herbarium Bogoriense with collection code BO 24420. The molecular phylogenetic tree using RAxML was used to identify the species of the specimen. Morphological data were used to support the species name of the specimen. Specimen BO 24420 was identified as Tricahleurina javanica with 81% bootstrap value. Molecular identification was supported by the morphological data, such as the two oil globules and the size of mature ascospores. Keywords – goblet-shaped fungi – Herbarium Bogoriense – Pyronemataceae Introduction Trichaleurina is a genus built by Rehm (1903) and known by other researchers since a publication of a valid genus by Rehm (1914).
    [Show full text]
  • Kingdom Fungi
    Fungi, Galls, Lichens, Prokaryotes and Protists of Elm Fork Preserve These lists contain the oddballs that do not fit within the plant or animal categories. They include the other three kingdoms aside from Plantae and Animalia, as well as lichens and galls best examined as individual categories. The comments column lists remarks in the following manner: 1Interesting facts and natural history concerning the organism. Place of origin is also listed if it is an alien. 2 Edible, medicinal or other useful qualities of the organism for humans. The potential for poisoning or otherwise injuring humans is also listed here. 3Ecological importance. The organisms interaction with the local ecology. 4Identifying features are noted, especially differences between similar species. 5Date sighted, location and observations such as quantity or stage of development are noted here. Some locations lend themselves to description -- close proximity to a readily identifiable marker, such as a trail juncture or near a numbered tree sign. Other locations that are more difficult to define have been noted using numbers from the location map. Global Positioning System (GPS) coordinates are only included for those organisms that are unusual or rare and are likely to be observed again in the same place. 6 Synonyms; outdated or recently changed scientific names are inserted here. 7 Control measures. The date, method and reason for any selective elimination. 8 Intentional Introductions. The date, source and reason for any introductions. 9 Identification references. Species identifications were made by the author unless otherwise noted. Identifications were verified using the reference material cited. 10Accession made. A notation is made if the organism was photographed, collected for pressing or a spore print was obtained.
    [Show full text]