Maritime Strategy - Working Papers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Maritime Strategy - Working Papers U.S. Naval War College U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons EMC Chair Symposia Events 3-2016 EMC Chair Symposium - Maritime Strategy - Working Papers The U.S. Naval War College Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/emcchair-symposia Recommended Citation War College, The U.S. Naval, "EMC Chair Symposium - Maritime Strategy - Working Papers" (2016). EMC Chair Symposia. 1. https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/emcchair-symposia/1 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Events at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in EMC Chair Symposia by an authorized administrator of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TABLE OF CONTENTS Welcome from the EMC Chair Dr. Derek S. Reveron, EMC Informationist Chair, U.S. Naval War College ........................................... 1 Keynote Address Admiral Bill Halsey and the Unanticipated Strategy: The South Pacific in World War II ...................... 3 Dr. Thomas Hughes, School of Advanced Air and Space Studies Panel 1: International Perspectives on Maritime Strategy A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower, An Indian Perspective ............................................ 5 ADM Nirma Verma, IN (Ret.), U.S. Naval War College Western Hemisphere Perspective on Maritime Strategy .......................................................................... 7 ADM Guillermo E. Barrera Hurtado, ARC (Ret.), U.S. Naval War College Avoiding the Dragon's Breath and the Bear's Claws ............................................................................... 9 RAdm Christopher Parry, CBE, University of Reading Risks, Rhetoric and Reality: United States Maritime Strategy 2015 and Beyond .................................... 11 CDRE Lee Cordner, RAN (Ret.), The University of Adelaide Panel 2: Reflections on Maritime Strategy Reflections on the 2007 Maritime Strategy and the Future of Maritime Thinking in the U.S. Navy ........ 13 CAPT Peter D. Haynes, USN, U.S. Special Operations Command Developing Maritime Strategy ................................................................................................................. 15 Mr. Bryan McGrath, The FerryBridge Group A Fleet Perspective on the Maritime Strategy .......................................................................................... 17 CDR Andrea H. Cameron, USN, U.S. Naval War College Reflections on U.S. Naval Strategy before 2007 ....................................................................................... 19 Mr. Peter M. Swartz, CNA Panel 3: Navy Force Development Tailoring a Naval Force Structure to the Emerging Future Security Environment .................................. 21 Dr. Henry Hendrix II, Center for a New American Security Five Costs of Military Innovation ............................................................................................................. 23 Ms. Lena S. Andrews, PhD candidate, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Impacts of the Robotics Age on Naval Force Structure Planning ............................................................ 26 Prof. Jeffrey E. Kline, Naval Postgraduate School Rethinking the Navy’s Strategic Presumptions and Planning Procedures ............................................... 28 Mr. Paul S. Giarra, Global Strategies & Transformation Panel 4: New Perspectives on Maritime Strategy The Suitability of Grand Strategy for Today............................................................................................. 31 Dr. Lukas Milevski, Changing Character of War Programme, University of Oxford Computational Approaches to Strategic Reasoning: Maritime Strategy and Beyond ............................. 33 Mr. Adam Elkus, PhD student, George Mason University, Continuing Control: Strategic Reasoning for the 21st Century ............................................................... 35 Mr. Nicholas C. Prime, PhD candidate, King's College London Panel 5: Maritime Warfare “Virtual Attrition” and Victory in Maritime Warfare ............................................................................... 39 Mr. Bryan Clark, Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments Commanding Tomorrow's Contested Zone: Operationalizing CS21 in the Littorals ............................... 41 Dr. Francis G. Hoffman, National Defense University Future Maritime Forces: Unmanned, Autonomous, and Lethal ............................................................... 48 Dr. William F. Bundy, U.S. Naval War College The Prism of Classical Naval Strategy: Another Perspective on JAM-GC and 21st Century Operational Concepts ........................................................................................................................ 50 CDR Benjamin “BJ” Armstrong, USN, PhD candidate, King's College London Panel 6: Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief Advancing the U.S. Sea Services’ Capacity to Respond to Urban Humanitarian Disasters and Complex Emergencies ........................................................................................................................ 52 Dr. Michael D. Lappi, Harvard Humanitarian Initiative The Urban Dilemma in Civil-Military Humanitarian Coordination ........................................................ 54 Dr. Ronak B. Patel, Stanford University School of Medicine Strategic Surprise and Climate Change Support Strategies .................................................................... 56 Dr. Joseph DiRenzo III, U.S. Coast Guard Research and Development Center Improving Civil-Military Coordination and Protecting Aid Workers ....................................................... 59 Ms. Julia Brooks, Harvard Humanitarian Initiative WELCOME FROM THE EMC CHAIR Dr. Derek S. Reveron EMC Informationist Chair, U.S. Naval War College This third maritime-centric EMC Chair Symposium is a follow-up to the release of the 2015 “Cooperative Strategy for 21st century Seapower.” The symposium will explore maritime strategy, concepts essential to implement the maritime strategy, and international reactions to it. Participants from DOD, academia, and the policy community will convene in Newport to discuss force development, maritime warfare, role of technology, and humanitarian assistance. The implications are important for understanding the types of missions combatant commanders will execute and the types of equipment and training the sea services must provide to support these missions. This symposium in part fulfills the mission of the EMC Chair to support the Navy’s efforts to develop thinking about maritime security. Additional materials can be found at www.usnwc.edu/derekreveron. In an effort to share expertise with the Fleet and national security community beyond this event, the succeeding pages contain the working papers participants prepared in advance of the symposium. The six panels are: Panel 1: International Perspectives on Maritime Strategy The 2007 maritime strategy and its 2015 update stress the importance of partnering with navies around the world to provide maritime security. The 2015 revision of the Cooperative Strategy devotes an entire section to international partnerships because, “By expanding our network of allies and partners and improving our ability to operate alongside them, naval forces: foster the secure environment essential to an open economic system based on the free flow of goods, protect U.S. natural resources, promote stability, deter conflict, and respond to aggression.” The panel investigates this strategic approach to global maritime security, and discusses the effectiveness and limitations of the strategy. By bringing together international officers to reflect on the strategy and global role of the U.S. Navy, panelists will consider the challenges and opportunities for an internationalist maritime strategy. Panel 2: Reflections on Maritime Strategy The panel will review how the U.S. Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard refreshed the 2007 Cooperative Strategy to keep pace with changing times. Panelists will explain the advantages and drawbacks to how the sea services make strategy, draw lessons from the making of the 2007 maritime strategy, and furnish insight into how the services can execute the 2015 strategy in contested surroundings in Eurasia. The panel will shed light on how the U.S. Navy in particular can revise organizational arrangements to put strategy in charge of programming and budgeting--and thus reconnect maritime strategy to larger national purposes. Panel 3: Navy Force Development The 2015 maritime strategy calls for the Navy to possess a wide ranging set of capabilities including: all domain access, deterrence, sea control and power projection, and maritime security. Along with these capabilities, the updated strategy brings forward several concepts, which if implemented successfully, will enable the Navy to leverage partnerships with other services and countries, better prepare its people to implement the strategy in the future, and develop needed capabilities in the “electromagnetic-cyber” environment. This panel will offer perspectives on what force structure elements will be needed to achieve these objectives taking into account the growing threats around the world combined with budget realities. Panel 4: New Perspectives on Maritime Strategy This panel will offer perspectives from young scholars to illustrate how strategic theory interacts with the 21st century’s challenges. Serving as a bridge between today’s
Recommended publications
  • PULL TOGETHER Newsletter of the Naval Historical Foundation OUTREACH!
    Preservation, Education, and Commemoration Vol. 54, No. 2 Spring 2015 PULL TOGETHER Newsletter of the Naval Historical Foundation OUTREACH! Happy 100th U.S. Navy Reserve! Also in the issue: Welcome Aboard Rear Admiral Sam Cox, pp. 3-5; Washington Awards Dinner, pp. 6-7; Partner Profi le: Pritzker Military Museum and Library, p. 9; News from the Naval Historical Foundation, p. 10; Annual Report, pp. 11-14. Message From the Chairman The theme of this edition of Pull Together is the growing number of outreach activities that aim to educate the general public on aspects of our great naval heritage. An alliance of partners is helping to make these activities happen. Again in 2015 we offer many opportunities for members to discuss, share, and be a part of naval history. On April 15, the NHF is partnering for two member events. Once again at the Washington Navy Yard, we are joining with the Naval Submarine League to cohost the annual Submarine History Seminar, which will focus on the submarine-launched ballistic missile partnership this nation has maintained with Great Britain for a half a century. Meanwhile at Fraunce’s Tavern in New York, we will join with the local Navy League Council to honor Commo. Dudley W. Knox medal recipient Craig Symonds who will receive the John Barry Book Prize for his publication of Operation Neptune. A week later, on April 23, we gather with the National Maritime Historical Society for our joint Washington Awards dinner at the National Press Club where I will join with retired Coast Guard Commandant Robert Papp to present CNO Adm.
    [Show full text]
  • US Navy Mine Warfare Champion
    Naval War College Review Volume 68 Article 8 Number 2 Spring 2015 Wanted: U.S. Navy Mine Warfare Champion Scott .C Truver Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Truver, Scott .C (2015) "Wanted: U.S. Navy Mine Warfare Champion," Naval War College Review: Vol. 68 : No. 2 , Article 8. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol68/iss2/8 This Additional Writing is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Truver: Wanted: U.S. Navy Mine Warfare Champion COMMENTARY WANTED U.S. NAVY MINE WARFARE CHAMPION Scott C. Truver Successfully implementing innovation within a bureaucracy ultimately requires a champion to navigate the inherently political processes of securing sponsorship and resourcing. This is just as important to the very small as to the very large programs, particularly during periods of fiscal austerity. “It’s fragmented,” com- mented retired rear admiral Paul Ryan, former commander of the U.S. Navy’s Mine Warfare Command, in April 2014. “There is no single champion for mine warfare.”1 This lack of support presents challenges for the U.S. Navy and the nation, as the service struggles to articulate, and to muster the necessary backing for, mine warfare (MIW) strategies, programs, capabilities, and capacities. The task of confronting these challenges is complicated by the fact that MIW comprises not only mine-countermeasures (MCM—that is, minesweeping and mine hunt- ing) systems and platforms but also mines that can be employed to defeat our adversaries’ naval strategies and forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Science & Technology Trends 2020-2040
    Science & Technology Trends 2020-2040 Exploring the S&T Edge NATO Science & Technology Organization DISCLAIMER The research and analysis underlying this report and its conclusions were conducted by the NATO S&T Organization (STO) drawing upon the support of the Alliance’s defence S&T community, NATO Allied Command Transformation (ACT) and the NATO Communications and Information Agency (NCIA). This report does not represent the official opinion or position of NATO or individual governments, but provides considered advice to NATO and Nations’ leadership on significant S&T issues. D.F. Reding J. Eaton NATO Science & Technology Organization Office of the Chief Scientist NATO Headquarters B-1110 Brussels Belgium http:\www.sto.nato.int Distributed free of charge for informational purposes; hard copies may be obtained on request, subject to availability from the NATO Office of the Chief Scientist. The sale and reproduction of this report for commercial purposes is prohibited. Extracts may be used for bona fide educational and informational purposes subject to attribution to the NATO S&T Organization. Unless otherwise credited all non-original graphics are used under Creative Commons licensing (for original sources see https://commons.wikimedia.org and https://www.pxfuel.com/). All icon-based graphics are derived from Microsoft® Office and are used royalty-free. Copyright © NATO Science & Technology Organization, 2020 First published, March 2020 Foreword As the world Science & Tech- changes, so does nology Trends: our Alliance. 2020-2040 pro- NATO adapts. vides an assess- We continue to ment of the im- work together as pact of S&T ad- a community of vances over the like-minded na- next 20 years tions, seeking to on the Alliance.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Latency: Red, White, and Blue Managing the National and International Security Consequences of Disruptive Technologies Zachary S
    Strategic Latency: Red, White, and Blue Managing the National and International Security Consequences of Disruptive Technologies Zachary S. Davis and Michael Nacht, editors Center for Global Security Research Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory February 2018 Disclaimer: This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, nor any of their employees makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. LLNL-BOOK-746803 Strategic Latency: Red, White, and Blue: Managing the National and International Security Consequences of Disruptive Technologies Zachary S. Davis and Michael Nacht, editors Center for Global Security Research Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory February
    [Show full text]
  • NAVAL ENERGY FORUM Creating Spartan Energy Warriors: Our Competitive Advantage
    PROMOTING NATIONAL SECURITY SINCE 1919 NAVAL ENERGY FORUM Creating Spartan Energy Warriors: Our Competitive Advantage FORUM HIGHLIGHTS: u Keynote Addresses by Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus, Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Jonathan Greenert, Admiral John C. Harvey, and other Distinguished Guests u Presentations on importance of culture change, successes/challenges for our fleet and shore infrastructure, investments in alternative fuels, information systems, energy efficient acquisition, and game changing solutions u Special remarks by Mr. Jim Hornfischer, New York Times bestselling author OCTOBER 13-14, 2011 RONALD REAGAN BUILDING & ITC u WASHINGTON, DC WWW.GREENFLEET.DODLIVE.MIL/ENERGY WWW.NDIA.ORG/MEETINGS/2600 A WELCOME MESSAGE Welcome to the 2011 Naval Energy Forum. wars, deterring aggression, and maintaining freedom of the seas. That Since I announced the Navy’s energy goals is why avoiding these fuel price spikes and elevations is essential to the at this forum two years ago, we have Navy’s core mission, and why developing alternative fuels is a priority. We made remarkable progress in our efforts have already seen a return on our investments in more efficient energy to achieve greater energy security for the use. Last year, we launched the first hybrid ship in the Navy, the USS Navy and the nation. I am committed to Makin Island. In its maiden voyage, the Makin Island saved almost $2 positioning our Naval forces for tomorrow’s million in fuel costs. Over the lifetime of the ship, we can save $250 challenges, and changing the way the million at last year’s fuel prices. Department of the Navy uses, produces, and acquires energy is one of our greatest We also continue to make progress in our efforts to test and certify all challenges because it is also one of our of our aircraft and ships on drop-in biofuels.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 THERESA WERNER: the First Mobile Landing Platform Has Been Assigned to Central Command
    NATIONAL PRESS CLUB LUNCHEON WITH JONATHAN GREENERT SUBJECT: JONATHAN GREENERT WILL DISCUSS THE STATE OF THE NAVY TODAY AS WELL AS ITS STRATEGY TO AUGMENT NAVAL OPERATIONS IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC. MODERATOR: THERESA WERNER, PRESIDENT, NATIONAL PRESS CLUB LOCATION: NATIONAL PRESS CLUB BALLROOM, WASHINGTON, D.C. TIME: 12:30 P.M. EDT DATE: FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2012 (C) COPYRIGHT 2008, NATIONAL PRESS CLUB, 529 14TH STREET, WASHINGTON, DC - 20045, USA. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ANY REPRODUCTION, REDISTRIBUTION OR RETRANSMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED. UNAUTHORIZED REPRODUCTION, REDISTRIBUTION OR RETRANSMISSION CONSTITUTES A MISAPPROPRIATION UNDER APPLICABLE UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW, AND THE NATIONAL PRESS CLUB RESERVES THE RIGHT TO PURSUE ALL REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO IT IN RESPECT TO SUCH MISAPPROPRIATION. FOR INFORMATION ON BECOMING A MEMBER OF THE NATIONAL PRESS CLUB, PLEASE CALL 202-662-7505. THERESA WERNER: (Sounds gavel.) Good afternoon, and welcome to the National Press Club. My name is Theresa Werner, and I am the 105th president of the National Press Club. We are the world’s leading professional organization for journalists, committed to our profession’s future through our programming and events such as this, while fostering a free press worldwide. For more information about the National Press Club, please visit our website at www.press.org. To donate to programs offered to the public through our National Press Club Journalism Institute, please visit www.press.org/institute. On behalf of our members worldwide, I’d like to welcome our speaker and those of you attending today’s event. Our head table includes guests of our speaker as well as working journalists who are Club members.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation (PDF)
    DISSERTATION APPROVED BY Date J Moss Breen, Ph.D., Chair Tim Guetterman, Ph.D., Committee Member Moss Breen, Ph.D., Director Gail M. Jensen, AN EXPLORATION OF THE INFLUENCE AFLOAT MAINTENANCE HAS ON THE 21ST CENTURY NAVAL SAILOR’S REENLISTMENT DECISION ___________________________________ By KATHRYN SAMPSON WIJNALDUM ___________________________________ A DISSERTATION IN PRACTICE _________________________________ Submitted to the faculty of the Graduate School of Creighton University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education in Interdisciplinary Leadership _________________________________ Omaha, NE April 6, 2019 Copyright ©2019, Kathryn Sampson Wijnaldum This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no part of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. The views in this dissertation are of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Defense (DoD) or its components. The Department of the Navy nor any other component of the DoD has approved, endorsed, or authorized this product. iii Abstract Although the U.S. Navy has schools that enable boot camp graduates to complete the Sailorization process and transforms them into active-duty service members, life skills training that focuses on developing resiliency and toughness in new accessions and preparing them for the rigors and demands of service in afloat naval commands does not exist. Similarly, during periods of lengthy maintenance for afloat naval commands sailors’ ability to perform their tasks in the scope of their trained occupational specialty is challenged. Maintenance availability periods are a vulnerable time for first-term enlisted sailors, and their mentorship and development must become a command's priority if the goal is to retain trained personnel.
    [Show full text]
  • Farley Gmu 0883E 10681.Pdf
    Making Program/Budget Decisions about the Future of the Navy: How Senior Flag Officers Work with Political Appointees and Career Civilian Executives inside the Navy Headquarters A Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at George Mason University by Robin Lee Farley Master of Public Policy Harvard Kennedy School, 1989 Bachelor of Arts University of California, Berkeley, 1986 Director: Ann Baker, Professor Department of Public Policy Summer Semester 2014 George Mason University Fairfax, VA Copyright: 2014 Robin Lee Farley All Right Reserved ii DEDICATION This work is dedicated to my wife Karyn Barlow, and our two wonderful children Emma Grace Farley and William Robert Barlow Farley who all endured countless hours outside the house, or quiet inside, while “dad’s doing his dissertation.” iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project would never have been completed were it not for the support and encouragement of my wife, my family and friends and my co-workers. I would especially like to recognize the anonymous contribution of the dedicated public servants who agreed to participate in this study and by sharing their experiences of working together making decisions about the future Navy, helped contribute to a more thorough understanding about how the Department of the Navy headquarters actually works. I would like to acknowledge the support of my supervisor and co-workers at CNIC. They kept the proverbial trains running while I took time off to finish this project. Finally, I would like to thank the members of my Committee and Professor Baker, my Committee Chair for her endless patience, understanding and faith that gave me confidence when I was at the point of giving up and whose gentle but firm guidance was instrumental in bringing this project to completion.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Studies Quarterly an Air Force–Sponsored Strategic Forum on National and International Security
    SPRING 2012 Vol. 6, No. 1 Commentaries Space and Cyber: Shared Challenges, Shared Opportunities—Madelyn R. Creedon Enhancing Security by Promoting Responsible Behavior in Space—Amb Gregory L. Schulte Audrey M. Schaffer Implementing the National Security Space Strategy Gen C. Robert Kehler, USAF Space: Disruptive Challenges, New Opportunities, and New Strategies SPRING 2012 SPRING Lt Gen Ellen Pawlikowski, USAF, Doug Loverro, DISES, USAF and Col Tom Cristler, USAF, Retired China’s Military Role in Space Dean Cheng New Frontiers, Old Realities Everett Carl Dolman Solar Power in Space? Lt Col Peter Garretson, USAF Designer Satellite Collisions from Covert Cyber War Jan Kallberg The Space Code of Conduct Debate: A View from Delhi Rajeswari Pillai Rajagopalan Strategic Studies Quarterly An Air Force–Sponsored Strategic Forum on National and International Security VOLUME 6 SPRING 2012 NUMBER 1 Commentaries Space and Cyber: Shared Challenges, Shared Opportunities . 3 Madelyn R. Creedon Enhancing Security by Promoting Responsible Behavior in Space . 9 Ambassador Gregory L. Schulte Audrey M. Schaffer Feature Article Implementing the National Security Space Strategy . 18 Gen C. Robert Kehler, USAF Perspectives Space: Disruptive Challenges, New Opportunities, and New Strategies . 27 Lt Gen Ellen Pawlikowski, USAF Doug Loverro, DISES, USAF Col Tom Cristler, USAF, Retired, China’s Military Role in Space . 55 Dean Cheng New Frontiers, Old Realities . 78 Everett Carl Dolman Solar Power in Space? . 97 Lt Col Peter Garretson, USAF Designer Satellite Collisions from Covert Cyber War . 124 Jan Kallberg The Space Code of Conduct Debate: A View from Delhi . 137 Rajeswari Pillai Rajagopalan Book Reviews National Security Space Strategy Considerations . 149 Rick Larned, Cathy Swan and Peter Swan Reviewed by: Maj Nick Martin, USAF Asia’s Space Race .
    [Show full text]
  • The Gulfwar Andrew Charles Watt Andrew Charles Wall - the Gull War
    The GulfWar Andrew Charles Watt Andrew Charles Wall - The Gull War TABLE· OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 3 CHAPTER 1 7 Strategy and Technology- A Theoretical and AnalYlical Framework 7 CHAPTER 2 14 TcchrlOlogy and (he Gulf War 14 CHAPTER 3 27 Technology and the Decision-making Process of War - An Analysis of the Grand Strategic, Stratcgic ami Operational Leveh of Strategy 27 Thc Grand Suategic Level 27 The Strategic Level 30 Th~ Operational Level 38 CHAPTER 4 43 Technology, Strategy and the Decision Procc:;s 43 CHAPTER 5 55 Conclusiom; 55 APPENDIX 1 62 US Spacc Systems Employed in the Persian Gulf 62 APPENDIX 2 64 Organisaliom Reporting to the Secretary of Defense 64 2 Andrew Charles Wall - The Gull War Introduction 'It is not a Nintendo game. It is a tough battlefield where people are risking their lives' SC/Jwarzkopf (1) It is interesting btl[ not unexpected that General Schwarzkopf had to make this exhortation to the media. This 'Ninlendo' image of war was. however. poruayed by the military themselves in their initial briefings. Clearly there was no willingness to divnlge (he detail of the operation, so a hungry press was fed pictures of the snccessful performance of the Coalition weapons. Modern telecommunications allowed the entire world to bare witness to the dramatically effectivc impact of high technology weapon systc::.ms. Real time broadcasts were available for the rust time and as such the Gulf War developed into an immensely successful media event. The mcdia's fascination with the technologies employed in battle and their access availability to real time coverage meant that the world saw a high speed low casna]ty conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin 190815 (PDF Edition)
    RAO BULLETIN 15 August 2019 PDF Edition THIS RETIREE ACTIVITIES OFFICE BULLETIN CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING ARTICLES Pg Article Subject . * DOD * . 04 == DoD Deploy or Out Policy [03] ---- (Non-Deployable Airmen Drop from 7% to 5%) 05 == Trump Afghanistan Strategy [03] ---- (All Troops Out by 2020 Election) 07 == DoD Lawsuit ~ Nissan Repossession Policy ---- Cash Settlement For Troops Impacted) 07 == DoD Pharmacy Program [01] ---- (Concern Over U.S. Reliance on China) 08 == SECDEF [19] ---- (New Secretary & Deputy Secretary Confirmations) 10 == DoD Fraud, Waste, & Abuse ---- (Reported 01 thru 15 AUG 2019) 14 == POW/MIA [77] ---- (WWII Remains Return to U.S. in Repatriation Ceremony) 15 == POW/MIA [78] ---- (25 More Missing Service Members Identified from 55 Cases of Remains) 15 == POW/MIA Recoveries & Burials ---- (Reported 01 thru 15 AUG 2019 | Sixteen) . * VA * . 18 == VA Mission Act [12] ---- (5,000 Urgent Care Providers On Board – 2000 More to Go) 19 == VA NVDA Program [01] ---- (Volunteer Vets Making Sure No Veteran Dies Alone) 20 == Fisher House Expansion [22] ---- (Omaha Nebraska Facility Underway) 20 == VA Emergency Care [01] ---- ($53 Million in Claims Wrongfully Denied) 21 == VA Nursing Home [15] ---- (GAO Report Notes Upcoming CNH Availability Concerns) 1 22 == PTSD [253] ---- (Million Veteran Program Sheds Light on PTSD Genes) 23 == VA Same Day Appointment ---- (Program Needs Performance Measures) 24 == VASRD [02] ---- (Infectious Diseases, Immune Disorders & Nutritional Deficiencies Updated) 24 == VA Fraud, Waste, & Abuse ----
    [Show full text]
  • Pull Together Winter 2014
    Preservation, Education, and Commemoration Vol. 54, No. 1 Winter 2014-2015 PULL TOGETHER Newsletter of the Naval Historical Foundation The Recognition Issue! Commodore Dudley W. Knox Medal Recipient John B. Hattendorf As sketched by Director Emeritus J. William Middendorf II Related Stories on pages 3, 6, and 10 Also in this issue: Navy Reserve Centennial Book, pp. 12–14; Navy Museum News, pp. 15–18; Naval History News, pp. 19 –21; News from the NHF, pp. 22–24; Upcoming Symposia, p. 25; Calls for Papers, pp. 26–27; War of 1812 Documents, pp. 28–30 Message From the Chairman TThehe CCommodoreommodore DDudleyudley WW.. KKnoxnox LLifetimeifetime AAchievementchievement MMedals:edals: I appreciate the strong fi nancial support we continue to receive from our loyal PPartart ooff a GGrowingrowing RRecognitionecognition EEffortffort members, particularly the donations received during last year’s year-end appeal. ne of the outcomes of a with Mrs. Ingrid Beach serving as complete a master’s degree in You’ll recall that our annual letter was distributed in the wake of the workplace strategic review of NHF a co-presenter of the award. For security studies, after which he violence that occurred here at the NAVSEA headquarters in the Washington Part of a Growing Recognition Effort functions in the wake of 2014, Midshipman First Class will report to Pensacola, Fla., for Navy Yard. At that time, nothing was clear on the long-range security impact O Adm. Bruce DeMars accepting Matthew C. Huffman, a History fl ight training. of that tragic event, which even now is still evolving. We had known since the the foundation’s chairmanship in Department Honors graduate, Beginning in 1999, the NHF terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, that access to the Yard and the Navy 2008 was an emphasis to expand earned the award in recogni- has also sponsored a $500 naval Museum would become more challenging.
    [Show full text]