Pull Together Winter 2014
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
PULL TOGETHER Newsletter of the Naval Historical Foundation OUTREACH!
Preservation, Education, and Commemoration Vol. 54, No. 2 Spring 2015 PULL TOGETHER Newsletter of the Naval Historical Foundation OUTREACH! Happy 100th U.S. Navy Reserve! Also in the issue: Welcome Aboard Rear Admiral Sam Cox, pp. 3-5; Washington Awards Dinner, pp. 6-7; Partner Profi le: Pritzker Military Museum and Library, p. 9; News from the Naval Historical Foundation, p. 10; Annual Report, pp. 11-14. Message From the Chairman The theme of this edition of Pull Together is the growing number of outreach activities that aim to educate the general public on aspects of our great naval heritage. An alliance of partners is helping to make these activities happen. Again in 2015 we offer many opportunities for members to discuss, share, and be a part of naval history. On April 15, the NHF is partnering for two member events. Once again at the Washington Navy Yard, we are joining with the Naval Submarine League to cohost the annual Submarine History Seminar, which will focus on the submarine-launched ballistic missile partnership this nation has maintained with Great Britain for a half a century. Meanwhile at Fraunce’s Tavern in New York, we will join with the local Navy League Council to honor Commo. Dudley W. Knox medal recipient Craig Symonds who will receive the John Barry Book Prize for his publication of Operation Neptune. A week later, on April 23, we gather with the National Maritime Historical Society for our joint Washington Awards dinner at the National Press Club where I will join with retired Coast Guard Commandant Robert Papp to present CNO Adm. -
September 12, 2006 the Honorable John Warner, Chairman The
GENERAL JOHN SHALIKASHVILI, USA (RET.) GENERAL JOSEPH HOAR, USMC (RET.) ADMIRAL GREGORY G. JOHNSON, USN (RET.) ADMIRAL JAY L. JOHNSON, USN (RET.) GENERAL PAUL J. KERN, USA (RET.) GENERAL MERRILL A. MCPEAK, USAF (RET.) ADMIRAL STANSFIELD TURNER, USN (RET.) GENERAL WILLIAM G. T. TUTTLE JR., USA (RET.) LIEUTENANT GENERAL DANIEL W. CHRISTMAN, USA (RET.) LIEUTENANT GENERAL PAUL E. FUNK, USA (RET.) LIEUTENANT GENERAL ROBERT G. GARD JR., USA (RET.) LIEUTENANT GENERAL JAY M. GARNER, USA (RET.) VICE ADMIRAL LEE F. GUNN, USN (RET.) LIEUTENANT GENERAL ARLEN D. JAMESON, USAF (RET.) LIEUTENANT GENERAL CLAUDIA J. KENNEDY, USA (RET.) LIEUTENANT GENERAL DONALD L. KERRICK, USA (RET.) VICE ADMIRAL ALBERT H. KONETZNI JR., USN (RET.) LIEUTENANT GENERAL CHARLES OTSTOTT, USA (RET.) VICE ADMIRAL JACK SHANAHAN, USN (RET.) LIEUTENANT GENERAL HARRY E. SOYSTER, USA (RET.) LIEUTENANT GENERAL PAUL K. VAN RIPER, USMC (RET.) MAJOR GENERAL JOHN BATISTE, USA (RET.) MAJOR GENERAL EUGENE FOX, USA (RET.) MAJOR GENERAL JOHN L. FUGH, USA (RET.) REAR ADMIRAL DON GUTER, USN (RET.) MAJOR GENERAL FRED E. HAYNES, USMC (RET.) REAR ADMIRAL JOHN D. HUTSON, USN (RET.) MAJOR GENERAL MELVYN MONTANO, ANG (RET.) MAJOR GENERAL GERALD T. SAJER, USA (RET.) MAJOR GENERAL MICHAEL J. SCOTTI JR., USA (RET.) BRIGADIER GENERAL DAVID M. BRAHMS, USMC (RET.) BRIGADIER GENERAL JAMES P. CULLEN, USA (RET.) BRIGADIER GENERAL EVELYN P. FOOTE, USA (RET.) BRIGADIER GENERAL DAVID R. IRVINE, USA (RET.) BRIGADIER GENERAL JOHN H. JOHNS, USA (RET.) BRIGADIER GENERAL RICHARD O’MEARA, USA (RET.) BRIGADIER GENERAL MURRAY G. SAGSVEEN, USA (RET.) BRIGADIER GENERAL JOHN K. SCHMITT, USA (RET.) BRIGADIER GENERAL ANTHONY VERRENGIA, USAF (RET.) BRIGADIER GENERAL STEPHEN N. -
Dem Newsletter
Vol. 32, No. 8 www.arlingtondemocrats.org August 2007 We don’t have a tractor pull—but O’Leary letter condemned By a 40-7 tally, ACDC has “condemned” a let- cratic campaigns in Arlington.” we still have a ter sent out late in the primary campaign by Trea- In a series of bullet paragraphs, the resolution great County fair! surer Frank O’Leary and also dropped him from all then ruled that O’Leary would be excluded from all party campaign literature and events in this fall’s Joint Campaign materials, such as the Messenger, election campaign. distributed to all county households in September The resolution approved at the July ACDC to tout the Democratic ticket, and the sample bal- meeting specifically cited a reference in the O’Leary lot, distributed in October to identify those with campaign letter stating that his opponent, Bob party backing. The resolution also ruled that James, an African-American, was supported by O’Leary and his campaign be excluded from all “minority churches” in the county. That was one of party events during the fall campaign and not pro- several elements in the letter that prompted criti- vided access to any ACDC campaign resources, to cism from many Democrats. include the ACDC website. The resolution denounced the “tactics, tone and The resolution stated that ACDC “has a respon- content” of the letter as having “no place in Demo- continued on page four And the Democratic Booth at the fair is Fall campaign about to kick in how we kick off the The Arlington County Fair—August 16-19— One of every year’s favorite events—the Chili Fall Campaign followed by the Chili Cookoff on Labor Day, Sep- Cookoff—will once again be held at Lyon Park If you can blow up a tember 3, will kick off this year’s Joint Campaign. -
UNITED STATES ARMY WWI CHAPLAINS 1. Abbott, Alexander Howes 2. Abbott, Joseph V. 3. Abrams, William Edward 4. Acker, Lawr
UNITED STATES ARMY WWI CHAPLAINS 52. Arrowood, William W. 53. Arthur, Elijah A. 54. Ashford, William Curtis 1. Abbott, Alexander Howes 55. Ashmore, Charles Morriston 2. Abbott, Joseph V. 56. Aston, Andrew Clement 3. Abrams, William Edward 57. Atherholt, Edgar Frank 4. Acker, Lawrence 58. Atkinson, Harry Grant 5. Ackerman, Willliam 59. Atkinson, John Clark 6. Ackermann, Maurice 60. Atkinson, William Alexander 7. Ackley, Charles B. 61. Atkinson, William Austin 8. Acree, Claude Ferdinand 62. Auger, Elias 9. Adams, Chauncey Allen 63. Aull, Roger 10. Adams, Jr. , Eleazar Tarrant 64. Austin, Clarence L. 11. Adams, James B. 65. Averitt, Erwin L. 12. Addison, James Thayer 66. Axton, John Victor 13. Ahern, Stephen Leo 67. Axton, John T. 14. Aiken, William A. 68. Babcock, Byrl F. 15. Akin, Russell Ernest 69. Babcock, Sidney Henry 16. Albers, Joseph Henry 70. Babst, Julius J. 17. Alderton, Walker Moore 71. Bachelor, Theodore 18. Alexander, Eugene 72. Bachman, Francis D. 19. Alexander, William Marvin 73. Bacon, Alvin C. 20. Alfriend, William J. 74. Baczyk, Andrew J. 21. Allan, John James 75. Baer, Brenton Lloyd C. 22. Allchin, Frederick James 76. Bagby, Arthur Guy 23. Allen, Garrett LeRoy 77. Bagget, John F. 24. Allen, Jacob D. 78. Bailey, George Monballiu 25. Allen, Louis Chowning 79. Baird, William Parcell 26. Allgood, Jackson Lee 80. Baker, Abe L. 27. Allison, George William 81. Baker, Abram L. 28. Alton, John T. 82. Baker, Arthur M. 29. Amiger, William T. 83. Baker, Charles J. 30. Andem, Ralph Taylor 84. Baker, Henry Vernon 31. Anderson, Edgar W. 85. Baker, Wesley Leroy 32. -
Federal Libraries/Information Centers Chronology
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS THE FEDERAL LIBRARY AND BICENTENNIAL INFORMATION CENTER 1800 - 2000 COMMITTEE American Federal Libraries/Information Centers Chronology 1780 Military garrison at West Point establishes library by assessing officers at the rate of one day’s pay per month to purchase books—arguably the first federal library since it existed when the country was founded (predecessor to U.S. Military Academy Library) 1789 First official federal library established at the Department of State 1795 War Department Library established in Philadelphia as a general historical military library by Henry Knox, the first Secretary of War 1800 The Navy Department Library established on March 31 by direction of President John Adams to Secretary of the Navy Benjamin Stoddert 1800 Library of Congress (LoC) founded on April 24 1800 War Department Library collections destroyed in fire at War Office Building on November 8, soon after relocation to Washington 1802 The President and Vice President authorized to use LoC collections 1812 Supreme Court Justices authorized to use LoC collections 1812 Congress appropriates $50,000 for the procurement of instruments and books for Coast Survey 1814 British burn both State Department Library and LoC collections during War of 1812 1815 Congress purchases Thomas Jefferson’s private library to replace LoC collections and opens collections to the general public 1817 Earliest documentation of book purchasing for Department of Treasury library 1820 Army Surgeon General James Lovell establishes office collection of books -
Navy and Marine Corps Opposition to the Goldwater Nichols Act of 1986
Navy and Marine Corps Opposition to the Goldwater Nichols Act of 1986 A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Steven T. Wills June 2012 © 2012 Steven T. Wills. All Rights Reserved. 2 This thesis titled Navy and Marine Corps Opposition to the Goldwtaer Nichols Act of 1986 by STEVEN T. WILLS has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by Ingo Traushweizer Assistant Professor of History Howard Dewald Interim Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 ABSTRACT WILLS, STEVEN T., M.A., June 2012, History Navy and Marine Corps Opposition to the Goldwater Nichols Act of 1986 Director of Thesis: Ingo Traushweizer The Goldwater Nichols Act of 1986 was the most comprehensive defense reorganization legislation in a generation. It has governed the way the United States has organized, planned, and conducted military operations for the last twenty five years. It passed the Senate and House of Representatives with margins of victory reserved for birthday and holiday resolutions. It is praised throughout the U.S. defense establishment as a universal good. Despite this, it engendered a strong opposition movement organized primarily by Navy Secretary John F. Lehman but also included members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, prominent Senators and Congressman, and President Reagan's Secretary of Defense Casper Weinberger. This essay will examine the forty year background of defense reform movements leading to the Goldwater Nichols Act, the fight from 1982 to 1986 by supporters and opponents of the proposed legislation and its twenty-five year legacy that may not be as positive as the claims made by the Department of Defense suggest. -
US Navy Mine Warfare Champion
Naval War College Review Volume 68 Article 8 Number 2 Spring 2015 Wanted: U.S. Navy Mine Warfare Champion Scott .C Truver Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Truver, Scott .C (2015) "Wanted: U.S. Navy Mine Warfare Champion," Naval War College Review: Vol. 68 : No. 2 , Article 8. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol68/iss2/8 This Additional Writing is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Truver: Wanted: U.S. Navy Mine Warfare Champion COMMENTARY WANTED U.S. NAVY MINE WARFARE CHAMPION Scott C. Truver Successfully implementing innovation within a bureaucracy ultimately requires a champion to navigate the inherently political processes of securing sponsorship and resourcing. This is just as important to the very small as to the very large programs, particularly during periods of fiscal austerity. “It’s fragmented,” com- mented retired rear admiral Paul Ryan, former commander of the U.S. Navy’s Mine Warfare Command, in April 2014. “There is no single champion for mine warfare.”1 This lack of support presents challenges for the U.S. Navy and the nation, as the service struggles to articulate, and to muster the necessary backing for, mine warfare (MIW) strategies, programs, capabilities, and capacities. The task of confronting these challenges is complicated by the fact that MIW comprises not only mine-countermeasures (MCM—that is, minesweeping and mine hunt- ing) systems and platforms but also mines that can be employed to defeat our adversaries’ naval strategies and forces. -
Industrialization Puzzle”
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES SAMPLE-SELECTION BIASES AND THE “INDUSTRIALIZATION PUZZLE” Howard Bodenhorn Timothy W. Guinnane Thomas A. Mroz Working Paper 21249 http://www.nber.org/papers/w21249 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 June 2015 For comments and suggestions we thank Shameel Ahmad, Cihan Artunç, Gerard van den Berg, Claire Brennecke, Raymond Cohn, Thomas Cvrcek, Jeremy Edwards, James Fenske, Amanda Gregg, Farly Grubb, Sukjin Han, Brian A'Hearn, Philip Hoffmann, Sriya Iyer, John Komlos, John Murray, Sheilagh Ogilvie, Jonathan Pritchett, Paul Rhode, Mark Rosenzweig, Gabrielle Santangelo, Richard Steckel, Jochen Streb, William Sundstrom, Werner Troesken, James Trussell, Christopher Udry, Marianne Wannamaker, John Warner, David Weir, anonymous referees, and participants in seminars at the University of Michigan, the University of Nuremberg, Queen's University (Ontario), the Rhein-Westfälisches Wirtschaftsintitut, Tulane University, and the 2012 Cliometrics meetings. We thank Emilia Arcaleni, John Murray and Richard Steckel for sharing data. We acknowledge financial support from the Yale University Economic Growth Center. Meng Liu, Yiming Ma, and Adèle Rossouw provided excellent research assistance. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2015 by Howard Bodenhorn, Timothy W. Guinnane, and Thomas A. Mroz. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. -
Press Secretary Briefings, 2/9/76
Digitized from Box 16 of the Ron Nessen Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library This Copy For______________ __ N E W S C 0 N F E R E N C E #434 AT THE WHITE HOUSE WITH RON NESSEN AT 12:10 P.M. EST FEBRUARY 9, 1976 MONDAY MR. NESSEN: The President is going to announce at 12:30 that there will be a Bicentennial exhibition on space and technology developments, with the main part of it at the Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaverat~ He will be announcing that at 12:30, and then there will be briefings for the President to give him more details by Jim Fletcher of NASA and Guyford Stever, Director of the National Science Foundation and John Warner, the Adminis trator of the Bicentennial. So, we want to hurry and get to that. Q It is going to be where? MR. NESSEN: The Cabinet Room. Q No, no MR. NESSEN: At Cape Canaveral. Q Why should you have to finish your briefing in a hurry for that? MR. NESSEN: I don't think we have much stuff any' :ow today. I think I said the Kennedy Space Center at Cape Canaveral, which is the correct name of it. As you know, this afternoon at two o'clock there will be the presentation of diplomatic credentials by the Ambassadors of Thailand, Barbados, the Central African Republic and Peru. I wanted to point out one thing to you because I think there was a misimpression given in a New York Times story on Saturday, reporting on Secretary Kissinger's testimony about the uranium enrichment program. -
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE. Maron 19~
64 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE. MARon 19~ Also, a bill (H. R. 1034) granting a pension to William H. Also, petition of lithographers, for protection against foreign Byrum-to the Committee on Invalid Pensions. competition-to the Committee on Ways and Means. By Mr. WADSWORTH: A bill (H. R. 1035) for the relief of By Mr. SPALDING: Papers to correct the war record of George Mary McCarthy, mother of John E. McCarthy, Sixth Company, McBride-to the Committee on Military Affairs. First Battalion New York Sharpshooters-to the Committee on By Mr. WARNER: Petition of John T. Taylor and others, pray Invalid Pensions. ing for an appropriation to pay judgments rendered by the United Also, a bill (H. R. 1036) for the relief of George J. Campbell- States Court of Claims in favor of mail carriers for wages-to the to the Committee on War Claims. · Committee on Appropriations. Also, a bill (H. R. 1037) to remove the charge of desertion standing against the name of Patrick Dougherty, Com~any A, • Thirteenth New York Volunteer Infantry-to the Comnnttee on SENATE. Military Affairs. Also, a bill (H. R. 1038) for the relief of Hannah Howard, step FRIDAY, March 19, 1897. mother of Francis W. HowardJ late of Company D, Sixty-fourth Prayer by the Chaplain, Rev. W. H. MILBURN, D. D. NewYorkVolunteer Infantry-to the Committee on Invalid Pen The Journal of yesterday's proceedings was read and approved. sions. By Mr. WARNER: A bill (H. R. 1039) to grant a pension to SURVEYS IN INDIAN TERRITORY. Samuel L. Busick-to the Committee on Invalid Pensions. -
The United States Navy Looks at Its African American Crewmen, 1755-1955
“MANY OF THEM ARE AMONG MY BEST MEN”: THE UNITED STATES NAVY LOOKS AT ITS AFRICAN AMERICAN CREWMEN, 1755-1955 by MICHAEL SHAWN DAVIS B.A., Brooklyn College, City University of New York, 1991 M.A., Kansas State University, 1995 AN ABSTRACT OF A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2011 Abstract Historians of the integration of the American military and African American military participation have argued that the post-World War II period was the critical period for the integration of the U.S. Navy. This dissertation argues that World War II was “the” critical period for the integration of the Navy because, in addition to forcing the Navy to change its racial policy, the war altered the Navy’s attitudes towards its African American personnel. African Americans have a long history in the U.S. Navy. In the period between the French and Indian War and the Civil War, African Americans served in the Navy because whites would not. This is especially true of the peacetime service, where conditions, pay, and discipline dissuaded most whites from enlisting. During the Civil War, a substantial number of escaped slaves and other African Americans served. Reliance on racially integrated crews survived beyond the Civil War and the abolition of slavery, only to succumb to the principle of “separate but equal,” validated by the Supreme Court in the Plessy case (1896). As racial segregation took hold and the era of “Jim Crow” began, the Navy separated the races, a task completed by the time America entered World War I. -
Black Sailors, White Dominion in the New Navy, 1893-1942 A
“WE HAVE…KEPT THE NEGROES’ GOODWILL AND SENT THEM AWAY”: BLACK SAILORS, WHITE DOMINION IN THE NEW NAVY, 1893-1942 A Thesis by CHARLES HUGHES WILLIAMS, III Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS August 2008 Major Subject: History “WE HAVE . KEPT THE NEGROES’ GOODWILL AND SENT THEM AWAY”: BLACK SAILORS, WHITE DOMINION IN THE NEW NAVY, 1893-1942 A Thesis by CHARLES HUGHES WILLIAMS, III Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved by: Chair of Committee, James C. Bradford Committee Members, Julia Kirk Blackwelder Albert Broussard David Woodcock Head of Department, Walter Buenger August 2008 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT “We have . kept the negroes’ goodwill and sent them away”: Black Sailors, White Dominion in the New Navy, 1893-1942. (August 2008) Charles Hughes Williams, III, B.A., University of Virginia Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. James C. Bradford Between 1893 and 1920 the rising tide of racial antagonism and discrimination that swept America fundamentally altered racial relations in the United States Navy. African Americans, an integral part of the enlisted force since the Revolutionary War, found their labor devalued and opportunities for participation and promotion curtailed as civilian leaders and white naval personnel made repeated attempts to exclude blacks from the service. Between 1920 and 1942 the few black sailors who remained in the navy found few opportunities. The development of Jim Crow in the U.S.