DOCSLIB.ORG

Lessons from Operation Enduring Freedom

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lessons from Operation Enduring Freedom Supporting Air and Space Expeditionary Forces Lessons from Operation Enduring Freedom Robert S. Tripp, Kristin F. Lynch John G. Drew, Edward W. Chan Prepared for the United States Air Force Approved for public release; distribution unlimited R Project AIR FORCE The research reported here was sponsored by the United States Air Force under Contract F49642-01-C-0003. Further information may be obtained from the Strategic Planning Division, Directorate of Plans, Hq USAF. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Supporting air and space expeditionary forces : lessons from Operation Enduring Freedom / Robert S. Tripp ... [et al.]. p. cm. “MR-1819.” Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-8330-3517-7 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. United States. Air Force—Supplies and stores. 2. Airlift, Military—United States. 3. Operation Enduring Freedom. 4. Afghanistan—History—2001– 5. Operation Allied Force, 1999. 6. Kosovo (Serbia)—History—Civil War, 1998–1999. 7. Deployment (Strategy) 8. Logistics. I. Tripp, Robert S., 1944–. UG1103 .S867 2004 958.104'6—dc22 2003024740 Cover photo: Associated Press Photo at http://www.boeing.com/news/frontiers/archive/2002. R is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. R® is a registered trademark. R’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of its research sponsors. Cover design by Stephen Bloodsworth © Copyright 2004 R All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from R. Published 2004 by R 1700 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 201 North Craig Street, Suite 202, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-1516 R URL: http://www.rand.org/ To order R documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002; Fax: (310) 451-6915; Email: [email protected] PREFACE Since 1997, the RAND Corporation has studied options for configuring a future Agile Combat Support (ACS) system that would enable the goals of the Air and Space Expeditionary Force (AEF) to be achieved. Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), in Afghanistan, offered an opportunity to examine the implementation of new ACS concepts in a contingency environment. In 2000, RAND Project AIR FORCE helped evaluate combat support lessons from Joint Task Force Noble Anvil (JTF NA),1 the U.S. component of Operation Allied Force (OAF), in Serbia. Some of the concepts and lessons learned from JTF NA were implemented in supporting OEF. Supporting Air and Space Expeditionary Forces: Lessons from Operation Enduring Freedom presents an analysis of combat support experiences associated with Operation Enduring Freedom and com- pares these experiences with those associated with Operation Allied Force. The analysis presented an opportunity to compare findings and implications from JTF NA and OEF. Specifically, the objectives of the analysis were to indicate the performance of combat support in OEF, examine how ACS concepts were implemented in OEF, and compare JTF NA and OEF experiences to determine similarities and applicability of lessons across experiences and to determine whether some experiences are unique to particular scenarios. ______________ 1Joint Task Force Noble Anvil was the organization overseeing U.S. forces involved in Operation Allied Force. This report concentrates on Air Force operations conducted by Joint Task Force Noble Anvil. iii iv Supporting Air and Space Expeditionary Forces This analysis concentrates on U.S. Air Force operations in support of OAF—specifically, Joint Task Force Noble Anvil and the first 100 days of OEF. The report focuses on experiences from OEF and what those experiences imply for a combat support system designed to ensure that AEF goals can be achieved. It does not address other portions of the War on Terrorism, such as homeland defense (for example, Operation Noble Eagle). Task Force Enduring Look (AF/CVAX) sponsored this research, which was conducted in the Resource Management Program of RAND Project AIR FORCE, in coordination with the Air Force Deputy Chief of Staff for Installations and Logistics (AF/IL) and the Air Force Deputy Chief of Staff for Air and Space Operations (AF/XO). The research for this report was completed in February 2003. This report should be of interest to logisticians, operators, and mobility planners throughout the Department of Defense, especially those in the Air Force. This study is one of a series of RAND reports that address ACS issues in implementing the AEF. Other publications in the series include the following: • Supporting Expeditionary Aerospace Forces: An Integrated Strategic Agile Combat Support Planning Framework, Robert S. Tripp, Lionel A. Galway, Paul S. Killingsworth, Eric Peltz, Timothy L. Ramey, and John G. Drew (MR-1056-AF). This report de- scribes an integrated combat support planning framework that may be used to evaluate support options on a continuing basis, particularly as technology, force structure, and threats change. • Supporting Expeditionary Aerospace Forces: New Agile Combat Support Postures, Lionel Galway, Robert S. Tripp, Timothy L. Ramey, and John G. Drew (MR-1075-AF). This report describes how alternative resourcing of forward operating locations (FOLs) can support employment timelines for future AEF operations. It finds that rapid employment for combat requires some preposi- tioning of resources at FOLs. • Supporting Expeditionary Aerospace Forces: An Analysis of F-15 Avionics Options, Eric Peltz, H. L. Shulman, Robert S. Tripp, Timothy L. Ramey, Randy King, and John G. Drew (MR-1174-AF). Preface v This report examines alternatives for meeting F-15 avionics maintenance requirements across a range of likely scenarios. The authors evaluate investments for new F-15 avionics inter- mediate shop test equipment against several support options, including deploying maintenance capabilities with units, per- forming maintenance at forward support locations (FSLs), or performing all maintenance at the home station for deploying units. • Supporting Expeditionary Aerospace Forces: A Concept for Evolving to the Agile Combat Support/Mobility System of the Future, Robert S. Tripp, Lionel A. Galway, Timothy L. Ramey, Mahyar A. Amouzegar, and Eric Peltz (MR-1179-AF). This report describes the vision for the ACS system of the future based on individual commodity study results. • Supporting Expeditionary Aerospace Forces: Expanded Analysis of LANTIRN Options, Amatzia Feinberg, H. L. Shulman, L. W. Miller, and Robert S. Tripp (MR-1225-AF). This report examines alternatives for meeting Low Altitude Navigation and Targeting Infrared for Night (LANTIRN) support requirements for AEF op- erations. The authors evaluate investments for new LANTIRN test equipment against several support options, including de- ploying maintenance capabilities with units, performing main- tenance at FSLs, or performing all maintenance at continental United States support hubs for deploying units. • Supporting Expeditionary Aerospace Forces: Alternatives for Jet Engine Intermediate Maintenance, Mahyar A. Amouzegar, Lionel A. Galway, and Amanda Geller (MR-1431-AF). This report evalu- ates the manner in which Jet Engine Intermediate Maintenance (JEIM) shops can best be configured to facilitate overseas de- ployments. The authors examine a number of JEIM support op- tions, which are distinguished primarily by the degree to which JEIM support is centralized or decentralized. • Reconfiguring Footprint to Speed Expeditionary Aerospace Forces Deployment, Lionel Galway, Mahyar A. Amouzegar, R. J. Hillestad, and Don Snyder (MR-1625-AF). This study develops an analysis framework—footprint configuration—to assist in evaluating the feasibility of reducing the size of equipment or time-phasing the deployment of support and relocating some vi Supporting Air and Space Expeditionary Forces equipment to places other than forward operating locations. It also attempts to define footprint and to establish a way to moni- tor its reduction. • Supporting Expeditionary Aerospace Forces: An Operational Architecture for Combat Support Execution Planning and Control, James A. Leftwich, Robert S. Tripp, Amanda Geller, Patrick H. Mills, Tom LaTourrette, Charles Robert Roll, Cauley Von Hoffman, and David Johansen (MR-1536-AF). This report outlines the framework for evaluating options for combat support execution planning and control. The analysis describes the combat support command and control operational architecture as it is now and as it should be in the future. It also describes the changes that must take place to achieve that future state. RAND PROJECT AIR FORCE RAND Project AIR FORCE (PAF), a division of the RAND Corporation, is the U.S. Air Force’s federally funded research and development center for studies and analyses. PAF provides the Air Force with independent analyses of policy alternatives affecting the development, employment, combat readiness, and support of current and future aerospace forces. Research is conducted in four programs: Aerospace Force Development; Manpower, Personnel, and Training; Resource Management; and Strategy and Doctrine. Additional information about PAF is available on our web site at http://www.rand.org/paf. CONTENTS Preface ......................................... iii Figures ......................................... xi Tables.........................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • US Military Policy in the Middle East an Appraisal US Military Policy in the Middle East: an Appraisal
    Research Paper Micah Zenko US and Americas Programme | October 2018 US Military Policy in the Middle East An Appraisal US Military Policy in the Middle East: An Appraisal Contents Summary 2 1 Introduction 3 2 Domestic Academic and Political Debates 7 3 Enduring and Current Presence 11 4 Security Cooperation: Training, Advice and Weapons Sales 21 5 Military Policy Objectives in the Middle East 27 Conclusion 31 About the Author 33 Acknowledgments 34 1 | Chatham House US Military Policy in the Middle East: An Appraisal Summary • Despite significant financial expenditure and thousands of lives lost, the American military presence in the Middle East retains bipartisan US support and incurs remarkably little oversight or public debate. Key US activities in the region consist of weapons sales to allied governments, military-to-military training programmes, counterterrorism operations and long-term troop deployments. • The US military presence in the Middle East is the culmination of a common bargain with Middle Eastern governments: security cooperation and military assistance in exchange for US access to military bases in the region. As a result, the US has substantial influence in the Middle East and can project military power quickly. However, working with partners whose interests sometimes conflict with one another has occasionally harmed long-term US objectives. • Since 1980, when President Carter remarked that outside intervention in the interests of the US in the Middle East would be ‘repelled by any means necessary’, the US has maintained a permanent and significant military presence in the region. • Two main schools of thought – ‘offshore balancing’ and ‘forward engagement’ – characterize the debate over the US presence in the Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Military Bases and Facilities in the Middle East
    U.S. Military Bases and Facilities in the Middle East Fact Sheet - Matthew Wallin i June 2018 BOARD OF DIRECTORS The Honorable Gary Hart, Chairman Emeritus Admiral William Fallon, USN (Ret.) Senator Hart served the State of Colorado in the U.S. Senate Admiral Fallon has led U.S. and Allied forces and played a and was a member of the Committee on Armed Services leadership role in military and diplomatic matters at the highest during his tenure. levels of the U.S. government. Governor Christine Todd Whitman, Chairperson Raj Fernando Christine Todd Whitman is the President of the Whitman Strategy Group, a consulting firm that specializes in energy Raj Fernando is CEO and founder of Chopper Trading, a and environmental issues. technology based trading firm headquartered in Chicago. Nelson W. Cunningham, President of ASP Nelson Cunningham is President of McLarty Associates, the Scott Gilbert international strategic advisory firm headed by former White Scott Gilbert is a Partner of Gilbert LLP and Managing House Chief of Staff and Special Envoy for the Americas Director of Reneo LLC. Thomas F. “Mack” McLarty, III. Brigadier General Stephen A. Cheney, USMC (Ret.) Vice Admiral Lee Gunn, USN (Ret.) Brigadier General Cheney is the Chief Executive Officer of Vice Admiral Gunn is the President of the Institute of Public ASP. Research at the CNA Corporation, a non-profit corporation in Virginia. Norman R. Augustine The Honorable Chuck Hagel Mr. Augustine was Chairman and Principal Officer of the Chuck Hagel served as the 24th U.S. Secretary of Defense and American Red Cross for nine years and Chairman of the served two terms in the United States Senate (1997-2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Geopolitics Paper
    Provided by the author(s) and NUI Galway in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite the published version when available. Title Liberal Lawfare and Biopolitics: US Juridical Warfare in the War on Terror Author(s) Morrissey, John Publication Date 2011 Publication Morrissey, J. (2011) 'Liberal Lawfare and Biopolitics: US Information Juridical Warfare in the War on Terror'. Geopolitics, 16 (2):280-305. Link to publisher's http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2010.538872 version Item record http://hdl.handle.net/10379/2891 Downloaded 2021-09-29T03:57:57Z Some rights reserved. For more information, please see the item record link above. Liberal lawfare and biopolitics: US juridical warfare in the war on terror Please cite as: Morrissey, J. (2011) ‘Liberal lawfare and biopolitics: US juridical warfare in the war on terror’, Geopolitics, 16(2): 280-305 Published version available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2010.538872 JOHN MORRISSEY Department of Geography, National University of Ireland, Galway University Road, Galway, Ireland Liberal Lawfare and Biopolitics: US Juridical Warfare in the War on Terror Two basic forms of ‘lawfare’ are employed by the United States in its enactment of the war on terror; both of which have a biopolitical focus. The first strategy has been well documented.1 It involves the indefinite detention and sometimes extraordinary rendition of enemy combatants, legally sanctioned and politically justified by the ‘exceptional’ circumstances of late modern war and terrorist violence. Geography plays a central role in strategy number one: the legal statuses of detainees, whose lives and bodies are cast out and denied basic juridical rights, are bounded, identified and allowed for in extra-territorial spaces throughout the world, from Guantanamo Bay to Bagram Air Force Base.
    [Show full text]
  • Visit to Bahrain and Qatar 20 – 24/25 January 2013
    DEFENCE AND SECURITY 238 DSCTC 12 E rev. 1 Original: English SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSATLANTIC DEFENCE AND SECURITY CO-OPERATION (DSCTC) VISIT TO BAHRAIN AND QATAR 20 – 24/25 JANUARY 2013 DRAFT PROGRAMME AND LIST OF PARTICIPANTS International Secretariat January 2013 238 DSCTC 12 E rev. 1 1 DRAFT PROGRAMME The aim of this visit is to examine the contribution of the armed forces of NATO member countries and of others in Bahrain and Qatar to the security and stability of the region. Qatar is a key strategic base for the transatlantic Allies’ and partner countries’ missions in the region and Bahrain is the centre for maritime operations. Important notice: All meetings, speakers and venues are subject to change and in some cases we anticipate minor changes and updates to this programme up to the day of the meetings. All participants are required to carry their passports including a valid visa for Bahrain and Qatar with them at all times. You can reach Andrea Pretis, the Committee Co-ordinator, on +32 477 310 620 if you have any queries. SUNDAY 20 JANUARY MANAMA, BAHRAIN Please note: A special pick-up service between the Bahrain International Airport and the Gulf Hotel Bahrain has been arranged for every participant. Please therefore inform Andrea Pretis ([email protected] / +32 477 310 620) about any last minute changes of your itinerary. Accommodation The Gulf Hotel Bahrain Contact: Ozino Cardoz, Reservations Manager Address: P.O. Box 580, Manama / Bani Otbah Avenue in Adliya, Kingdom of Bahrain Tel: +973 17 746344 Fax: +973 17 712088 Email: [email protected] Website: http://gulfhotelbahrain.com/ 238 DSCTC 12 E rev.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO Vs. SCO: a Comparative Study of Outside Powers' Military
    Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies ISSN: 2576-5949 (Print) 2576-5957 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rmei20 NATO vs. SCO: A Comparative Study of Outside Powers’ Military Presence in Central Asia and the Gulf Degang Sun & Hend Elmahly To cite this article: Degang Sun & Hend Elmahly (2019): NATO vs. SCO: A Comparative Study of Outside Powers’ Military Presence in Central Asia and the Gulf, Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies, DOI: 10.1080/25765949.2018.1562594 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/25765949.2018.1562594 Published online: 04 Feb 2019. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 2 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rmei20 ASIAN JOURNAL OF MIDDLE EASTERN AND ISLAMIC STUDIES https://doi.org/10.1080/25765949.2018.1562594 ARTICLE NATO vs. SCO: A Comparative Study of Outside Powers’ Military Presence in Central Asia and the Gulf Degang Sun and Hend Elmahly Middle East Studies Institute, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, China ABSTRCT KEYWORDS The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the Shanghai Gulf Cooperation Council; Cooperation Organization (SCO) both have geopolitical interests the Shanghai Cooperation in Central Asia and the Gulf. The former is a military alliance, Organization; military bases; whose members have built substantial presence in the Greater balance of power; Central Asia Middle East, including the US military presence in Afghanistan, Djibouti, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain and Oman; the British military presence in Afghanistan and Bahrain; the French military presence in Afghanistan, Djibouti and the UAE.
    [Show full text]
  • Bahrain: Reform, Security, and U.S. Policy
    Order Code 95-1013 Updated August 4, 2006 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Bahrain: Reform, Security, and U.S. Policy Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Summary After instability during the late 1990s, Bahrain undertook substantial political reforms, but lingering tensions between ruling Sunni Muslims and the Shiite majority are re-emerging in advance of October 2006 parliamentary elections. Bahrain’s stability has long been a key U.S. interest; it has hosted U.S. naval headquarters for the Gulf for nearly 60 years. In September 2004, the United States and Bahrain signed a free trade agreement (FTA); legislation implementing it (H.R. 4340) was signed January 11, 2006 (P.L. 109-169). This report will be updated. See also CRS Report RS21846, U.S.-Bahrain Free Trade Agreement. The Political Structure, Reform, and Human Rights1 The Al Khalifa family has ruled Bahrain since 1783, when the family’s arrival ended a century of domination by Persian settlers. Bahrain became independent from Britain in August 1971 after a 1970 U.N. referendum determined that its inhabitants preferred independence to Iranian control. Political reform has been instituted by King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa (about 57 years old), who succeeded his father, Shaykh Isa bin Sulman Al Khalifa, upon his sudden death on March 6, 1999. King Hamad, educated at Sandhurst Military Academy in Britain, had previously been commander of the Bahraini Defense Forces (BDF) and handled U.S.-Bahrain defense cooperation. Hamad2 subsequently named his son, Salman, as Crown Prince.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Military Bases and Facilities in the Middle East
    U.S. Military Bases and Facilities in the Middle East Fact Sheet - Matthew Wallin i June 2018 BOARD OF DIRECTORS The Honorable Gary Hart, Chairman Emeritus Admiral William Fallon, USN (Ret.) Senator Hart served the State of Colorado in the U.S. Senate Admiral Fallon has led U.S. and Allied forces and played a and was a member of the Committee on Armed Services leadership role in military and diplomatic matters at the highest during his tenure. levels of the U.S. government. Governor Christine Todd Whitman, Chairperson Raj Fernando Christine Todd Whitman is the President of the Whitman Strategy Group, a consulting firm that specializes in energy Raj Fernando is CEO and founder of Chopper Trading, a and environmental issues. technology based trading firm headquartered in Chicago. Nelson W. Cunningham, President of ASP Nelson Cunningham is President of McLarty Associates, the Scott Gilbert international strategic advisory firm headed by former White Scott Gilbert is a Partner of Gilbert LLP and Managing House Chief of Staff and Special Envoy for the Americas Director of Reneo LLC. Thomas F. “Mack” McLarty, III. Brigadier General Stephen A. Cheney, USMC (Ret.) Vice Admiral Lee Gunn, USN (Ret.) Brigadier General Cheney is the Chief Executive Officer of Vice Admiral Gunn is the President of the Institute of Public ASP. Research at the CNA Corporation, a non-profit corporation in Virginia. Norman R. Augustine The Honorable Chuck Hagel Mr. Augustine was Chairman and Principal Officer of the Chuck Hagel served as the 24th U.S. Secretary of Defense and American Red Cross for nine years and Chairman of the served two terms in the United States Senate (1997-2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Ranking of Countries by the Number of Their Military Bases Abroad
    This is a not-for-profit service provided by the Basel Institute of Commons and Economics to allow free access to Global statistics. Browse more rankings on: http://commons.ch/world-rankings/ Ranking of countries by the number of military bases abroad in 2015 Number of military bases rank country abroad 1. USA 58 2. UK 26 3. Russia 18 4. France 11 5. India 6 Turkey 4 6. Germany 4 8. Italy 2 9. Japan 1 9. China 1 List and locations of US-American military bases abroad in 2015 Countries with US military bases / presences Afghanistan - Camp Dwyer; Forward Operating Base Delhi; Forward Operating Base Geronimo; Fire Base Fiddler's Green (4 bases) Australia - Pine Gap Bahrain - Naval Support Activity Bahrain; Isa Air Base (2 bases) Belgium - Chièvres Air Base; Kleine Brogel Air Base NATO (2 bases) Brazil - United States Naval Support Detachment São Paulo You want to score on countries by yourself? You can score eight indicators in 41 languages on https://trustyourplace.com/ This is a not-for-profit service provided by the Basel Institute of Commons and Economics to allow free access to Global statistics. Browse more rankings on: http://commons.ch/world-rankings/ British Indian Ocean Territory - Naval Support Facility Diego Garcia Bulgaria - Aitos Logistics Center; Bezmer Air Base; Graf Ignatievo Air Base; Novo Selo Range (4 bases) Cuba - Guantanamo Bay Naval Base Djibouti - Camp Lemonnier Germany-Panzerkaserne; Ramstein Air Base; Spangdahlem Air Base (3 bases) Greece - Naval Support Activity Souda Bay Greenland - Thule Air Base Honduras - Soto
    [Show full text]
  • By a Thesis Submitted to the University of Plymouth in Partial Fiilfillment for the Degree of School of Earth, Ocean, and Enviro
    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk 04 University of Plymouth Research Theses 01 Research Theses Main Collection 2004 DEVELOPMENT OF WATER RESOURCES IN BAHRAIN: A COMBINED APPROACH OF SUPPLY-DEMAND ANALYSIS AL-NOAIMI, MUBARAK AMAN http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/1951 University of Plymouth All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. DEVELOPMENT OF WATER RESOURCES IN BAHRAIN: A COMBINED APPROACH OF SUPPLY - DEMAND ANALYSIS VOLUME ONE by MUBARAK AM AN AL-NOAIMI A thesis submitted to the University of Plymouth in partial fiilfillment for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Earth, Ocean, and Environmental Sciences Faculty of Science ^_ 2004 Universl^^of Plymouth Ibrary COPYRIGHT STATEMENT This copy of the dissertation has been supplied on conditions that anyone who consults it is tniderstood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from this dissertation atid no information derived from it may be published without the author *s prior written consent. Dedication to the soul of my father .... with great appreciation, to my family, Iman, Bader, and Faris .... with great love. DEVELOPMENT OF WATER RESOURCES IN BAHRAIN: A COMBINED APPROACH OF SUPPLY-DEMAND ANALYSIS by Mubarak Aman Al-Noaimi Bahrain is an arid country with acute water shortage problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Air University Research Template: a Tutorial
    Foreign Policy at BROOKINGS No “Plan B” U.S. Strategic Access in the Middle East and the Question of Bahrain Commander Richard McDaniel, United States Navy FEDERAL EXECUTIVE FELLOW st CENTER FOR 21 CENTURY SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE POLICY PAPER June 2013 Foreign Policy at BROOKINGS The views expressed in this monograph are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Navy, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. COVER PHOTO COURTESY OF THE U.S. NAVY FLICKR CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. IV CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................1 Bahrain: A Strategic Necessity ..................................................................................1 Would the United States Let Bahrain Slip Away? .................................................2 CHAPTER 2: TWO SUPRISE CASES .............................................................................3 Lost Access in the Past ...............................................................................................3 Iran: The Black Swan ..................................................................................................3 The Philippines: Resurging Nationalism ................................................................4 Lessons .........................................................................................................................4 CHAPTER
    [Show full text]
  • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY the Gulf and the Arabian Peninsula Is the Most Important Single Theater in the US-Iranian Strategic Competition
    US AND IRANIAN STRATEGIC COMPETITION The Gulf and the Arabian Peninsula Anthony H. Cordesman and Robert M. Shelala II Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy [email protected] Third Edition January 7, 2013 Note: This report will be updated. Please provide comments and suggestions to [email protected] VI. US Competition with Iran: The Gulf and Arabian Peninsula AHC December 30, 2012 ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Gulf and the Arabian Peninsula is the most important single theater in the US-Iranian strategic competition. The proximity of the Arab Gulf states to Iran; the region’s geostrategic value to the stability of the global economy; the shifting military balance; and the social, demographic, and economic tensions that threaten to create political upheavals in several key states make it a potential flash-point in tensions between Washington and Tehran. While each state in the region has unique challenges, several overarching issues shape the significance of the region: Natural Resources: The large reserves of oil and natural gas in the Arabian Peninsula make the security and stability of the region of vital importance to the US. Three of the world’s top 10 producers of oil are located on the peninsula – Saudi Arabia (1), the United Arab Emirates (7) and Kuwait (10).1 The size of proved oil reserves in many of these states also ensures that these countries will continue to be major players in the global oil trade so long as there is demand. According to the Central Intelligence Agency, Saudi Arabia ha the largest proven oil reserves of any country in the world, with 17% of the world total.
    [Show full text]
  • The Persian Gulf States: Issues for US Policy, 2006
    The Persian Gulf States: Issues for U.S. Policy, 2006 (name redacted) Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs August 21, 2006 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RL31533 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress The Persian Gulf States: Issues for U.S. Policy, 2006 Summary The U.S.-led war to overthrow Saddam Hussein virtually ended Iraq’s ability to militarily threaten the region, but it has produced new and un-anticipated security challenges for the Persian Gulf states (Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman, and the United Arab Emirates). The Gulf states, which are all led by Sunni Muslim regimes, fear that Shiite Iran is unchecked now that Iraq is strategically weak. The Gulf states strongly resent that pro-Iranian Shiite Muslim groups and their Kurdish allies (who are not Arabs) have obtained preponderant power within Iraq. This has led most of the Gulf states, particularly Saudi Arabia, to provide only halting support to the fledgling government in Baghdad and to revive the focus on U.S.-Gulf defense cooperation that characterized U.S.-Gulf relations during the 1990s. The new power structure in Iraq has had political repercussions throughout the Gulf region, particularly as Sunni-Shiite violence in Iraq has come to overshadow direct insurgent violence against U.S. forces as the key threat to Iraqi stability. The Sunni-Shiite tensions in Iraq apparently are spilling over into the Gulf states. Shiite communities, particularly that in Bahrain, have been emboldened by events in Iraq to seek additional power, and Sunni-Shiite tension in the Gulf states is said by observers to be increasing.
    [Show full text]