FAO/UNESCO Soil Map of the World

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FAO/UNESCO Soil Map of the World FA 0-Unesco S oilmap of the world FAO-Unesco Soil map of the world 1: 5 000 000 Volume II North America FAO-Unesco Soil map of the world Volume I Legend Volume II North America Volume III Mexico and Central America Volume IV South America Volume V Europe Volume VI Africa Volume VII South Asia Volume VIII North and Central Asia Volume IX Southeast Asia Volume X Australasia AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS WIFOOD UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION FAO-Unesco Soilmap of the world 1 : 5 000 000 Volume II North America Prepared by the National Cooperative Soil Survey of the United States of America, the National Soil Survey Committee of Canada, and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Unesco-Paris 1975 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations or theUnited Nations Educational,Scientific and Cultural Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authori- ties,or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Printed by Tipolitografia F. Failli, Rome for the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Published in 1975 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Place de Fontenoy, 75700 Paris © FAO/Unesco 1975 ISBN 92 - 3 - 101126 - X Printed in Italy PREFACE The project for a joint FA0/Unesco Soil Map of the with the responsibilityof compiling the technical World was undertaken following a recommendation information, correlating the studies and coordinat- of the International Society of Soil Science.It is ing the drafting of the maps and text.FAO and the first attempt to prepare, on the basis of interna- Unesco shared the expenses involved in the realiza- tional cooperation, a soil map covering all the con- tion of the project, and Unesco undertook publica- tinents of the world in a uniform legend, thus en- tion of its results. abling the correlation of soil units and comparisons The present volume, covering the soils of North on a global scale.The project, which started in America, is the second of a set of ten which make 1961,fillsa gap inpresentknowledge ofsoil up the complete publication of the Soil Map of the potentialities throughout the world and provides a World.The first volume records introductory in- useful instrument in planning agricultural and eco- formation and presents the definitions of the elements nomic development programmes. of the legend which is used uniformly throughout the The project has been carried out under the scien- publication.Each of the nine following volumes tific authority of an international advisory panel, comprises an explanatory text and the corresponding withintheframework of FAO and Unesco pro- map sheets covering the main regions of the world. grammes.The different stages of the work included FAO and Unesco wish to express their gratitude comparative studies of soil maps, field and laboratory to the government institutions,theInternational work, and the organization of international expert Society of Soil Science, and the many individual soil meetings and study tours.The secretariat of the scientists who have contributed so much to this in- joint project, located at FAO Headquarters, was vested ternational project. CONTENTS Preface H. Phaeozems in the United States 95 I.Lithosols in Canada 96 Summaries VII I.Lithosols in the United States 97 J.Fluvisols in Canada 97 English VII J.Fluvisols in the United States 98 French IX K. Kastanozems in Canada 98 Russian XI Kastanozems in the United States 100 Spanish XIII Luvisols in Canada 101 L. Luvisols in the United States 102 Introduction 1 M. Greyzems in Canada 104 104 Acknowledgements 3 M. Greyzems in the United States O. Histosols in Canada 104 The map 4 Histosols in the United States 105 Podzols in Canada 106 4 Topographic base P. Podzols in the United States 106 4 Map units R. Regosols in Canada 107 Cartographic representation 4 Regosols in the United States 108 Sources of information 6 Solonetz in Canada 110 S.Solonetz in the United States 111 Environmental conditions 8 Andosols in Canada 111 SOIL CLIMATE 8 T.Andosols in the United States 111 Soil temperature 9 V. Vertisols in the United States 112 Soil moisture 11 W Planosols in the United States 112 Xerosols in the United States 113 VEGETATION 17 Yermosols in the United States 113 Vegetation regions 17 Solonchaks in Canada 114 PHYSIOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY. 30 Z. Solonchaks in the United States 115 Conclusions 115 T"he soils of North America 41 Distribution of major soils 41 Appendix 1.Morphological,chemicaland physicalpropertiesof North American Description and distribution of soils, land use soils: data from selected profiles 116 and soil suitability 82 LAND USE IN NORTH AMERICA 82 Appendix 2.Table of correlated legends of DESCRIPTION, DISTRIBUTION AND SUITABILITY reference soil maps 208 OF SOILS 84 A. Acrisols in the United States 86 Figures B. Cambisols in Canada 87 B. Cambisols in the United States 88 Sources of information 6 C. Chernozems in Canada 89 Soil climate regimes 13 Chernozems in the United States 90 Potential natural vegetation regions 19 Podzoluvisols in the United States 91 Physiographic regions 33 Rendzinas in Canada 91 Surface geology 35 G. Gleysols in Canada 91 Major soil regions 43 G. Gleysols in the United States 94 Land-use regions 85 vi SUMMARY This volume describes the North American section relationships with the pattern of soils: soil of the 1: 5 000 000 Soil Map of the World. climate, The vegetation, physiography and surfacegeology. compilation of the Soil Map of North Americawas Classification of soil climate is basedon soil tem- jointly carried out in 1970-71 by the Soil Research perature and soil moisture regimes as defined in the Institute of the Canada Department of Agriculture U.S. Department of AgricultureSoil Taxonomy. and the Soil Conservation Service of the United Since the criteria used in delimiting soilclimatic States Department of Agriculture. units are those important to plant growth, thesoil climate map is complementary to the soilmap in the transfer of crop information fromone part of The maps the world to another.The main soil climatic re- gions are outlined on a small-scalemap (Figure 2). The two map sheets which make up the Soil Map Vegetation is discussed on the basis of 24 potential of North America are drawn on topographic base natural vegetation regions distinguishedon the basis maps of the 1 : 5 000 000 series of the American of the association of plant communities and their Geographical Society.The map units are associations relationships to environmental conditions.These re- of soil units divided into texture and slope classes. gions are outlined on a small-scalemap (Figure 3). They are marked on the maps by symbols.The The text gives some brief notes on each region. dominant soils are shown by colours and phases The discussion of physiographic regions includes are shown by overprints. brief statements on the geology and geomorphology A small inset map shows the reliability of soil of broad areas of the subcontinent.Twelve regions information from which the map was compiled. are delineated on a small-scale map (Figure 4). Detaileddefinitions of thesoil units and full Surface geology is shown only by a map (Figure 5); descriptions of all the terms used may be found in there is no explanatory text.Fourteen map units Volume I. show dominant rock types grouped according to geologic era. The text SOILS AND LAND USE The first chapter describes the development of the Chapters 5 and 6, describing the soils of the con- project in North America and gives some possible tinent, contain an extensive table of soil associations, uses of the map. The second acknowledges the co- an account of the distribution of the main soils, and operation of participating agencies and the large a discussion of land use and soil suitabilities for number of people who contributed to the maps and agriculture. text, and the third gives a brief explanation of the The table of soil associations lists all the map units soil legend, which is described in detail in Volume I, in alphabetical order of symbols.Other columns and the principal sources of information utilized in show: the compilation of the map. The main chapters of this volume deal with en- Associated soils vironmental conditions, soil distribution, land use Inclusions and suitability. Phases Areas of units in1 000 hectares ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS Climate Regions of occurrence Chapter 4 contains brief accounts, with maps, of Vegetation the four factors of the environment that have close Lithology or parent materials vii The distribution of major soils is discussed on the continent are in an environment generally better basis of 18 major soil regions which are outlined on suited for farming, although in the southwestern a small-scale map (Figure 6).The main soils of part they are subject to limitations imposed by a each region are discussed in relation to factors of deficiency of moisture and in the western and east- the environment, and a brief account of their extent ern parts by steep slopes of mountains and highlands. and location is given. In only 5 percent of Canada are the soils used for Description and distribution of soils, land use and farm enterprises. An additional 2 percent of the soil suitability are discussedin Chapter6.In a land area of the country has potential for develop- short introductory note to the chapter, distribution ment, although some of it has limitations imposed of the principal kinds of land use in North America by climate and physical features.In the United is outlined and is further illustrated in Figure 7.
Recommended publications
  • Topic: Soil Classification
    Programme: M.Sc.(Environmental Science) Course: Soil Science Semester: IV Code: MSESC4007E04 Topic: Soil Classification Prof. Umesh Kumar Singh Department of Environmental Science School of Earth, Environmental and Biological Sciences Central University of South Bihar, Gaya Note: These materials are only for classroom teaching purpose at Central University of South Bihar. All the data/figures/materials are taken from several research articles/e-books/text books including Wikipedia and other online resources. 1 • Pedology: The origin of the soil , its classification, and its description are examined in pedology (pedon-soil or earth in greek). Pedology is the study of the soil as a natural body and does not focus primarily on the soil’s immediate practical use. A pedologist studies, examines, and classifies soils as they occur in their natural environment. • Edaphology (concerned with the influence of soils on living things, particularly plants ) is the study of soil from the stand point of higher plants. Edaphologist considers the various properties of soil in relation to plant production. • Soil Profile: specific series of layers of soil called soil horizons from soil surface down to the unaltered parent material. 2 • By area Soil – can be small or few hectares. • Smallest representative unit – k.a. Pedon • Polypedon • Bordered by its side by the vertical section of soil …the soil profile. • Soil profile – characterize the pedon. So it defines the soil. • Horizon tell- soil properties- colour, texture, structure, permeability, drainage, bio-activity etc. • 6 groups of horizons k.a. master horizons. O,A,E,B,C &R. 3 Soil Sampling and Mapping Units 4 Typical soil profile 5 O • OM deposits (decomposed, partially decomposed) • Lie above mineral horizon • Histic epipedon (Histos Gr.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Indicators of Hydric Soils
    United States Department of Field Indicators of Agriculture Natural Resources Hydric Soils in the Conservation Service United States In cooperation with A Guide for Identifying and Delineating the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils Hydric Soils, Version 8.2, 2018 Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States A Guide for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils Version 8.2, 2018 (Including revisions to versions 8.0 and 8.1) United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils Edited by L.M. Vasilas, Soil Scientist, NRCS, Washington, DC; G.W. Hurt, Soil Scientist, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; and J.F. Berkowitz, Soil Scientist, USACE, Vicksburg, MS ii In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.
    [Show full text]
  • World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014 International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps
    ISSN 0532-0488 WORLD SOIL RESOURCES REPORTS 106 World reference base for soil resources 2014 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps Update 2015 Cover photographs (left to right): Ekranic Technosol – Austria (©Erika Michéli) Reductaquic Cryosol – Russia (©Maria Gerasimova) Ferralic Nitisol – Australia (©Ben Harms) Pellic Vertisol – Bulgaria (©Erika Michéli) Albic Podzol – Czech Republic (©Erika Michéli) Hypercalcic Kastanozem – Mexico (©Carlos Cruz Gaistardo) Stagnic Luvisol – South Africa (©Márta Fuchs) Copies of FAO publications can be requested from: SALES AND MARKETING GROUP Information Division Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00100 Rome, Italy E-mail: [email protected] Fax: (+39) 06 57053360 Web site: http://www.fao.org WORLD SOIL World reference base RESOURCES REPORTS for soil resources 2014 106 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps Update 2015 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2015 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • Terra Rossa in the Mediterranean Region: Parent Materials, Composition and Origin
    Geologia Croatica 56/1 83–100 23 Figs. 6 Tabs. ZAGREB 2003 Terra Rossa in the Mediterranean Region: Parent Materials, Composition and Origin Goran DURN Key words: Terra rossa, Parent materials, Composi- relict soil formed during the Tertiary and/or hot and humid periods of the Quaternary. However, some recent investigation in the Atlantic tion, Origin, Mediterranean region. coastal region of Morocco (BRONGER & SEDOV, 2002) show that at least some terra rossa previously referred to as polygenetic relict soils should be regarded as Vetusols. In some isolated karst terrain, terra Abstract rossa may have formed exclusively from the insoluble residue of lime- In the past, the term “terra rossa” became quite a common indication stone and dolomite but much more often it comprises a span of parent for all limestone derived red soils in the Mediterranean region. Today, materials including, for example, aaeolian dust, volcanic material or in some classification systems based on the Mediterranean climate as sedimentary clastic rocks which were derived on carbonate terrain via the major soil differentiating criterion, the term terra rossa is used as a different transport mechanisms. BOERO & SCHWERTMANN (1989) name for the soil subclass “Modal Fersiallitic Red soil” when situated concluded that it is of little relevance for the process of rubification on limestones (DUCHAUFOUR, 1982). However, several national whether the primary Fe sources are autochthonous or allochthonous as soil classifications (e.g. Croatian, Italian, Israeli) retained the term long as the general pedoenvironment remains essentially suitable for “terra rossa” for the hard limestone derived red soils. The nature and the formation of terra rossa.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Practices for the Preparation of Digital Soil Maps
    UNIVERSIDAD DE COSTA RICA CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIONES AGRONÓMICAS FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS AGROALIMENTARIAS GOOD PRACTICES FOR THE PREPARATION OF DIGITAL SOIL MAPS Resilience and comprehensive risk management in agriculture Inter-american Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture University of Costa Rica Agricultural Research Center UNIVERSIDAD DE COSTA RICA CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIONES AGRONÓMICAS FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS AGROALIMENTARIAS GOOD PRACTICES FOR THE PREPARATION OF DIGITAL SOIL MAPS Resilience and comprehensive risk management in agriculture Inter-american Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture University of Costa Rica Agricultural Research Center GOOD PRACTICES FOR THE PREPARATION OF DIGITAL SOIL MAPS Inter-American institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (IICA), 2016 Good practices for the preparation of digital soil maps by IICA is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/) Based on a work at www.iica.int IICA encourages the fair use of this document. Proper citation is requested. This publication is also available in electronic (PDF) format from the Institute’s Web site: http://www.iica. int Content Editorial coordination: Rafael Mata Chinchilla, Dangelo Sandoval Chacón, Jonathan Castro Chinchilla, Foreword .................................................... 5 Christian Solís Salazar Editing in Spanish: Máximo Araya Acronyms .................................................... 6 Layout: Sergio Orellana Caballero Introduction .................................................. 7 Translation into English: Christina Feenny Cover design: Sergio Orellana Caballero Good practices for the preparation of digital soil maps................. 9 Printing: Sergio Orellana Caballero Glossary .................................................... 15 Bibliography ................................................. 18 Good practices for the preparation of digital soil maps / IICA, CIA – San Jose, C.R.: IICA, 2016 00 p.; 00 cm X 00 cm ISBN: 978-92-9248-652-5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Content of Mineral Nitrogen in Histosols and Its Relationship with Soil Organic Matter
    ISSN 1392-3196 Zemdirbyste-Agriculture Vol. 107, No. 1 (2020) 11 ISSN 1392-3196 / e-ISSN 2335-8947 Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, vol. 107, No. 1 (2020), p. 11–16 DOI 10.13080/z-a.2020.107.002 The content of mineral nitrogen in Histosols and its relationship with soil organic matter Gediminas STAUGAITIS, Andrius ŠARKA Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Agrochemical Research Laboratory Savanorių 287, Kaunas, Lithuania E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The aim of the research was to investigate the content of mineral nitrogen (Nmin) at the 0–30, 30–60 and 60–90 cm layers of Histosols and their relationship with soil organic matter (SOM). The experiment was conducted in natural or cultivated perennial meadows of Lithuania in 2016–2018. Every year in November, 21 sites were installed and Nmin was analysed. The studies showed that the content of Nmin in Histosols were significantly higher compared to those in mineral soils, and they widely ranged in the air-dried soil samples at different depths as follows: 37.5 to -1 -1 -1 128.2 mg kg at 0–30 cm, 22.9 to 143.4 mg kg at 30–60 cm and 5.2 to 85.3 mg kg at 60–90 cm. Nmin content at the 0–30 and 30–60 cm layers were lower in Bathiterric Histosol and Bathifibric-Fibric Histosol compared to those in Pachiterric Histosol and Pachiterri-Fibric Histosol. In addition, the content of Nmin in Histosols depended on the peat layer thickness. At the 60–90 cm layer of Pachiterric Histosol and Pachiterri-Fibric Histosol, mineral soil was already present in many of the profiles, and SOM was lower, therefore, minN content was lower as well.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Era of Digital Soil Mapping Across Forested Landscapes 14 Chuck Bulmera,*, David Pare´ B, Grant M
    CHAPTER A new era of digital soil mapping across forested landscapes 14 Chuck Bulmera,*, David Pare´ b, Grant M. Domkec aBC Ministry Forests Lands Natural Resource Operations Rural Development, Vernon, BC, Canada, bNatural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre, Quebec, QC, Canada, cNorthern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, St. Paul, MN, United States *Corresponding author ABSTRACT Soil maps provide essential information for forest management, and a recent transformation of the map making process through digital soil mapping (DSM) is providing much improved soil information compared to what was available through traditional mapping methods. The improvements include higher resolution soil data for greater mapping extents, and incorporating a wide range of environmental factors to predict soil classes and attributes, along with a better understanding of mapping uncertainties. In this chapter, we provide a brief introduction to the concepts and methods underlying the digital soil map, outline the current state of DSM as it relates to forestry and global change, and provide some examples of how DSM can be applied to evaluate soil changes in response to multiple stressors. Throughout the chapter, we highlight the immense potential of DSM, but also describe some of the challenges that need to be overcome to truly realize this potential. Those challenges include finding ways to provide additional field data to train models and validate results, developing a group of highly skilled people with combined abilities in computational science and pedology, as well as the ongoing need to encourage communi- cation between the DSM community, land managers and decision makers whose work we believe can benefit from the new information provided by DSM.
    [Show full text]
  • Pedometric Mapping of Key Topsoil and Subsoil Attributes Using Proximal and Remote Sensing in Midwest Brazil
    UNIVERSIDADE DE BRASÍLIA FACULDADE DE AGRONOMIA E MEDICINA VETERINÁRIA PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM AGRONOMIA PEDOMETRIC MAPPING OF KEY TOPSOIL AND SUBSOIL ATTRIBUTES USING PROXIMAL AND REMOTE SENSING IN MIDWEST BRAZIL RAÚL ROBERTO POPPIEL TESE DE DOUTORADO EM AGRONOMIA BRASÍLIA/DF MARÇO/2020 UNIVERSIDADE DE BRASÍLIA FACULDADE DE AGRONOMIA E MEDICINA VETERINÁRIA PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM AGRONOMIA PEDOMETRIC MAPPING OF KEY TOPSOIL AND SUBSOIL ATTRIBUTES USING PROXIMAL AND REMOTE SENSING IN MIDWEST BRAZIL RAÚL ROBERTO POPPIEL ORIENTADOR: Profa. Dra. MARILUSA PINTO COELHO LACERDA CO-ORIENTADOR: Prof. Titular JOSÉ ALEXANDRE MELO DEMATTÊ TESE DE DOUTORADO EM AGRONOMIA BRASÍLIA/DF MARÇO/2020 ii iii REFERÊNCIA BIBLIOGRÁFICA POPPIEL, R. R. Pedometric mapping of key topsoil and subsoil attributes using proximal and remote sensing in Midwest Brazil. Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Brasília- Brasília, 2019; 105p. (Tese de Doutorado em Agronomia). CESSÃO DE DIREITOS NOME DO AUTOR: Raúl Roberto Poppiel TÍTULO DA TESE DE DOUTORADO: Pedometric mapping of key topsoil and subsoil attributes using proximal and remote sensing in Midwest Brazil. GRAU: Doutor ANO: 2020 É concedida à Universidade de Brasília permissão para reproduzir cópias desta tese de doutorado e para emprestar e vender tais cópias somente para propósitos acadêmicos e científicos. O autor reserva outros direitos de publicação e nenhuma parte desta tese de doutorado pode ser reproduzida sem autorização do autor. ________________________________________________ Raúl Roberto Poppiel CPF: 703.559.901-05 Email: [email protected] Poppiel, Raúl Roberto Pedometric mapping of key topsoil and subsoil attributes using proximal and remote sensing in Midwest Brazil/ Raúl Roberto Poppiel. -- Brasília, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Soils of County Clare
    Copyright of Teagasc, The Agriculture and Food Development Authority Soil Survey Bulletin No. 23 Soils of County Clare by T. F. Finch (Report compiled by T. F, Finch, E. Culleton and S. Diamond) National Soil Survey of Ireland An Foras Taluntais (THE AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTE) Published by An Foras Taluntais, 33 Merrion Road, Dublin 4 Price: £1.50 June, 1971 PREFACE This publication, Soil Survey Bulletin No. 23, presents the findings of the Soil Survey of County Clare. It is one of a series of county soil surveys being carried out by the National Soil Survey of An Foras Taluntais (The Agricultural Institute) for the purpose of providing basic information which can be used in optimum land-use planning. The field mapping was carried out at a scale of 1:10,560 (6 in. = 1 mile; 15 cm = 1.6 km) but the detail mapped on the field sheets is not shown on the published soil map at the scale of 1:126,720 (} in. 1 mile: 1.25 cm = 1.6 km) due to scale limitation. Copies of the field maps are available for consultation in the Soil Survey Office at Johnstown Castle, Wexford. Mr. T. F. Finch was responsible for the operation of this survey; he commenced work in the county in 1965 and completed the field investigations in 1968. Technical assistance was provided from time to time by Mr. P. Feeney, Mr. T. O'Shea and Mr. T. Martin. Mr. S. Diamond gave assistance and advice in soil correlation, classification and land-use interpretation, and Mr. R. F.
    [Show full text]
  • Variability of Soil Types in Wetland Meadows in the South of the Chilean Patagonia
    266RESEARCH CHIL. J. AGRIC. RES. - VOL. 70 - Nº 2 - 2010 VARIABILITY OF SOIL TYPES IN WETLAND MEADOWS IN THE SOUTH OF THE CHILEAN PATAGONIA Ladislava Filipová1*, Radim Hédl2, and Nilo Covacevich C.3 ABSTRACT The wetland meadows and pastures (vegas) of the agricultural zone of the Magallanes Region and the Chilean Patagonia are productive and intensively exploited ecosystems. However, there is scarce data about the typology and the physical and chemical properties of the soils that determine the agricultural potential of vegas sites. Sampling of the main horizons of 47 soil profiles was conducted throughout the area. The profiles were described in the field and consequently classified according to the soil typology system of the WRB (IUSS Working Group WRB, 2006). Analyses of bulk and particle densities, capillary water capacity, pH (H2O), pH (CaCl2), texture, organic material, C:N ratio, electrical conductivity, effective cation exchange capacity, N, P, Ca-Mg-K-Na, exchangeable Al, 2- extractable Al, sulfur SO4 , B, and micronutrients (Cu-Zn-Mn-Fe) were carried out. The most frequently recorded groups of soil types in the studied vegas were Histosols - peat soils (20 profiles), and Fluvisols (19). Gleysols (3), Vertisols (1), Regosols (3), Solonchaks (1) and Solonetzs (1) were detected with much less frequency. There is also considerable variability in soil properties among and within the groups of soil types. The principal differences between the Histosols and the Fluvisols are the content of organic matter (often peat), pH level (related to the absence/presence of carbonates) and associated soil properties. Fluvisols are more susceptible to salinization under conditions of aridity, whereas the main threat to Histosols is artificial drainage.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Distribution of Soil Organic Carbon (SOC)
    SOIL, 1, 351–365, 2015 www.soil-journal.net/1/351/2015/ doi:10.5194/soil-1-351-2015 SOIL © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Global distribution of soil organic carbon – Part 1: Masses and frequency distributions of SOC stocks for the tropics, permafrost regions, wetlands, and the world M. Köchy1,*, R. Hiederer2, and A. Freibauer1 1Thünen Institute of Climate-Smart Agriculture, Bundesallee 50, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany 2Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Via E. Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra (VA), Italy *now at: Thünen Institute of Market Analysis, Bundesallee 50, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany Correspondence to: M. Köchy (offi[email protected]) Received: 24 July 2014 – Published in SOIL Discuss.: 3 September 2014 Revised: 27 February 2015 – Accepted: 16 March 2015 – Published: 16 April 2015 Abstract. The global soil organic carbon (SOC) mass is relevant for the carbon cycle budget and thus atmo- spheric carbon concentrations. We review current estimates of SOC stocks and mass (stock × area) in wetlands, permafrost and tropical regions and the world in the upper 1 m of soil. The Harmonized World Soil Database (HWSD) v.1.2 provides one of the most recent and coherent global data sets of SOC, giving a total mass of 2476 Pg when using the original values for bulk density. Adjusting the HWSD’s bulk density (BD) of soil high in organic carbon results in a mass of 1230 Pg, and additionally setting the BD of Histosols to 0.1 g cm−3 (typ- ical of peat soils), results in a mass of 1062 Pg. The uncertainty in BD of Histosols alone introduces a range of −56 to C180 Pg C into the estimate of global SOC mass in the top 1 m, larger than estimates of global soil respiration.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States: for All Soils
    Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States: For All Soils • From Vasilas, L.M., G.W. Hurt, and C.V. Noble. 2010. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States (Version 7.0), USDA, NRCS, Fort Worth, TX. http://soils.usda.gov/soil_use /hydric/field_ind.pdf • As revised Field Indicators • The publication Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the US (Hurt, and Vasilas 2006) is the reference for this lecture. Any statement in this lecture such as “see glossary” refers to this publication. • There are three divisions to the indicators: – Indicators with the letter A preceding a number are used for all soils, regardless of texture. – Indicators with the letter S preceding a number are used for all sandy soil material. – Indicators with the letter F preceding a number are used for all loamy and clayey soil material. Indicators for all soils regardless of texture • All mineral layers above any of the layers meeting an A Indicator(s), except for Indicator A16 have dominant chroma 2 or less, or the layer(s) with dominant chroma of more than 2 is less than 15 cm (6 inches) thick. In addition nodules and concretions are not redox concentrations. Use the following Indicators regardless of texture. A1. Histosol • Histosols (For use in all LRRs) or Histels (For use in LRRs with permafrost). Classifies as a Histosol (except Folist) or as a Histel (except Folistel). • Histosol User Notes: In a Histosol, typically 40 cm (16 inches) or more of the upper 80 cm (32 inches) is organic soil material. Organic soil materials have organic carbon contents (by weight) of 12 to 18 percent, or more, depending on the clay content of the soil.
    [Show full text]