Joseph Smith's Monogamy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Joseph Smith's Monogamy Joseph Smith’s Monogamy: Exploring a Counter­narrative Regarding Plural Marriage Was Joseph Smith, the founding prophet of various Mormon sects, a monogamist? Such an idea is incredible to virtually every person familiar with the practice of plural marriage in the Mormon religion. The prevailing narrative regarding this topic takes for granted that Joseph was the originator of the plural marriage doctrine in Mormonism. Truly, there is a significant amount of evidence to bolster this view. One could easily cite accusations made during Joseph’s life as well as those that followed after his martyrdom to build a significant case that he was a polygamist. However, there are compelling counter arguments to be considered. Accepting that Joseph was a polygamist requires a person to wrestle with significant inconsistencies with that narrative, such as Joseph’s numerous and consistent denials, the lack of offspring from polygamous unions during his life, a lack of reliable contemporary evidence, contradictory testimony from his accusers, and modified historical records. Joseph’s conduct in investigating, identifying, disciplining, and condemning the adulterous relationships in Nauvoo makes more sense if his polygamy denials are accepted as truthful. His two­year­long quest using the Nauvoo High Council to ferret out sexual promiscuity, discipline those involved, and correct their misbehavior makes more sense if he was not a secret polygamist. No matter what a person ultimately decides about plural marriage, it requires many assumptions. There isn’t ever likely to be enough compelling evidence to definitively prove whether Joseph was or wasn’t a polygamist. However, by the end of this paper, the reader may be better equipped to make an informed assumption. The Problem of Paternity ­­ Joseph Smith “I had not been married scarcely five minutes, and made one proclamation of the Gospel, before it was reported that I had seven wives.” —Joseph Smith (LDS History of the Church 6:411, 26 May 1844) ​ ​ Verifiable children fathered by Joseph Smith are linked to one woman, Emma Smith, Joseph’s first and potentially only wife. There have been many claims to the contrary but no claim has ever been validated by DNA. Joseph is alleged to have had more than 30 wives over a period of 11 years1. As such, it seems unlikely that not a single descendant could be proven from one of these other unions. Joseph conceived 9 children with Emma. His first alleged plural 1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Joseph_Smith%27s_wives ​ wife was Fanny Alger, who bore 9 children with another man. She, like Joseph, was clearly capable of producing offspring. Yet their alleged union, in the prime of their reproductive years, produced no offspring. The question “why” needs to be answered, or at least considered. In 1879, Joseph F. Smith conceded the point that there were no children from these unions: When asked on November 1, 1879, “Why did Joseph Smith the Prophet have no [polygamous] children?” Joseph F. Smith responded: “Because it would have been against him and the law of the state against bigamy. The children would have been proven to be his or the mothers would have been condemned for illicit intercourse, polygamous marriages not being considered legitimate marriages.”2 Admittedly, not everyone can or has been DNA tested. Some potential candidates died as infants and cannot be tested. However, every known test has come back negative or inconclusive. One recent effort disproved Joseph’s paternity for 5 potential descendants.3 Consider also that the common justification in Mormon theology is that plural marriage is to "raise up seed" according to Jacob 2 (which most observers interpret as a reference to increasing the birth rate).4 In that construct it’s hard to imagine Joseph failing in such a significant way. The lack of children from other women makes more sense if Joseph was a monogamist. If it’s true that Joseph only had children with Emma, it offers a stark contrast with the brand of plural marriage practiced by Brigham Young. Young’s polygamy resulted in marriages to 56 women. He fathered 57 children from 16 of those wives.5 Once again, the question of why there was such a significant disparity needs to be answered, or at least considered. As it stands, the only verifiable offspring of Joseph Smith came from his legal wife, Emma. The Problem of Paternity ­­ Brigham, Heber, et al As we have lately been credibly informed, that an Elder of the Church of Jesus Christ, of Latter­day Saints, by the name of Hiram Brown, has been preaching Polygamy, and other false and corrupt doctrines, in the county of Lapeer, state of Michigan. This is to notify him and the Church in general, that he has been cut off from the church, for his iniquity; and he is further notified to appear at the Special Conference, on the 6th of April next, to make answer to these charges. —Joseph Smith & Hyrum Smith, Times and Seasons 5 [February 1, 1844]: 423 2 Brian C. Hales, Joseph Smith’s Polygamy: Volume 3 p 375 ​ ​ 3 http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700150651/DNA­solves­a­Joseph­Smith­mystery.html?pg=all ​ 4 e.g. http://en.fairmormon.org/Mormonism_and_polygamy/Purpose_of_plural_marriage ​ 5 http://historytogo.utah.gov/utah_chapters/pioneers_and_cowboys/thewivesofbrighamyoung.html ​ The lack of children attributed to Joseph is damaging to the argument that Joseph was a polygamist. Similarly damaging is the lack of children born to most of the people who claim to have practiced polygamy during Joseph Smith’s lifetime. According to an analysis by George D. Smith, there were a total of 42 alleged plural marriage unions involving 25 men (excluding Joseph Smith’s alleged activity) while Joseph was alive.6 There were 5 such unions in 1842, 21 in 1843, and 14 more before Joseph’s death in June 1844. One would expect that during this time there would have been a rash of children born from these unions. However, an analysis by Gary Bergera states that there were only four children potentially born from polygamous relationships prior to Joseph’s death:7 ● Lucina Cahoon (about 1843) ● Adelmon/Adelbert Kimball (1842) ● Adelbert Daniel Clayton (2/18/1844) ● George Noble (2/2/1844) Further investigation of these births reveals that the actual number of children is even smaller. In the case of Lucina Cahoon, there is scant evidence that this child ever existed. The only evidence is a record from a descendant of Reynolds Cahoon, the alleged father, in a family history published in 1960.8 The only information provided is the name of the child, a birthdate of “about 1843, probably Nauvoo”. Given the uncertainty of the birth date or even location, and the source being nearly 120 years after the fact, this birth is questionable at best. A discerning observer would not likely rely on this as proof of a child born from a polygamous union during Joseph’s lifetime. The data for the next child, Adelmon or Adelbert Kimball, is conflicted, but Adelmon was born about Oct 1842 and died Apr 1843. He was born to Sarah Peak, the first alleged plural wife to Heber C Kimball. Before Sarah married Heber, she was married to William Noon. William and Sarah moved to Nauvoo from England in 1841, but for unknown reasons, William abandoned his family and returned to England. William and Sarah are shown in various sources to have had three children. Their final child was named Adelmon, born in 1842, and died Apr 1843.9 In other sources Sarah Peak is shown to have given birth to a child named Adelbert with her new husband, Heber C Kimball. This child is also shown to have been born in Oct 1842 and died in Apr 1843. However, it’s not possible for Sarah to have delivered two children who were born and died at the same time and fathered by two different men. The conclusion, then, is that 6 Nauvoo Roots of Mormon Polygamy, 1841­46: A Preliminary Demographic Report, p 30 ​ ​ ​ 7 Identifying the Earliest Mormon Polygamists, 1841­44, p. 50 ​ ​ 8 https://archive.org/stream/reynoldscahoonhi00shur#page/84/mode/2up/search/lucina ​ 9 http://familypedia.wikia.com/wiki/Sarah_Peak_(1811­1873) ​ it’s the same child (as some family histories show).10 Adelmon was either the son of William Noon and later claimed by Kimball to be his; or, Adelmon was Kimball’s son but was easily explained as the last child conceived with William Noon before William abandoned his family. Regardless, in the theory that Joseph Smith was a monogamist, this child would not have raised eyebrows in Nauvoo as he would have easily been attributed to William Noon. As such, this child is not valid proof that plural marriage was being practiced with Joseph’s consent. The third child, Adelbert Daniel Clayton, is a somewhat similar story to that of Adelbert Kimball. The fact they share a first name seems an interesting coincidence. The birth of the Clayton child is supported by some historical evidence. There is an entry in William Clayton’s journal on Feb 18, 1844 referencing the birth of a child to Margaret Moon, Clayton’s first plural wife.11 Little Adelbert passed away six months later. While this is a compelling case of a child born from plural marriage before the death of Joseph, there are problems with Clayton’s journal that call into question the validity of the narrative surrounding his relationship with Margaret Moon. These problems are discussed in greater detail later in this paper. Regardless, a reasonable observer could conclude that this child was indeed born from a polygamous relationship during Joseph’s lifetime.
Recommended publications
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO the New and Everlasting
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO The New and Everlasting Order of Marriage: The Introduction and Implementation of Mormon Polygamy: 1830-1856 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History by Merina Smith Committee in charge: Professor Rebecca Plant, Chair Professor Claudia Bushman Professor John Evans Professor Mark Hanna Professor Christine Hunefeldt Professor Rachel Klein 2011 The Dissertation of Merina Smith is approved, and is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: _______________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________ Chair University of San Diego 2011 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page……………………………………………………………………… iii Table of Contents………………………………………………………………….. iv Vita………………………………………………………………………………… v Abstract……………………………………………………………………………. vi Introduction ..……………………………………………………………………… 1 Chapter One: ………………………………………………………………………. 28 Mormon Millenarian Expectations: 1830-1841 The Restoration of All Things and the Resacralization of Marriage Chapter Two: ………………………………………………………………………. 84 Nauvoo Secrets and the Rise of a Mormon Salvation Narrative, 1841-42 Chapter Three: ……………………………………………………………………... 148 Scandal and Resistance, 1842 Chapter Four:
    [Show full text]
  • UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The new and everlasting order of marriage : the introduction and implementation of Mormon polygamy : 1830-1856 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8p56036q Author Smith, Merina Publication Date 2011 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO The New and Everlasting Order of Marriage: The Introduction and Implementation of Mormon Polygamy: 1830-1856 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History by Merina Smith Committee in charge: Professor Rebecca Plant, Chair Professor Claudia Bushman Professor John Evans Professor Mark Hanna Professor Christine Hunefeldt Professor Rachel Klein 2011 The Dissertation of Merina Smith is approved, and is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: _______________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________ Chair University of San Diego 2011 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page……………………………………………………………………… iii Table of Contents………………………………………………………………….. iv Vita………………………………………………………………………………… v Abstract……………………………………………………………………………. vi Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Dialogue V09N04 23.Pdf
    22 / Dialogue are brief and veiled, and those that are not come almost exclusively from unsym- pathetic apostate sources. Plural marriage, like other alternative forms of marriage and family organization originating in this period, was so controversial that it could be introduced only under cover of secrecy. One consequence is that almost all detailed public explanations and defenses of plural marriage were made after it was relatively well-established in Utah and had been practiced by the leaders of the Church for approximately a decade. Whether such statements represent the at- titudes and beliefs of the earliest period is unclear. The official announcement of Latter-day Saint belief and practice of polygamy was given at a special conference of the Church in late August 1852.x At that time, Orson Pratt, one of the twelve apostles of the Church, presented a major speech which provided most of the arguments that would be used to explain and justify plural marriage during the succeeding four decades when it was publicly defended and practiced by the Mormons in Utah. At the same conference, a revelation was read publicly for the first time which had allegedly been given through the prophet Joseph Smith on July 12, 1843, in Nauvoo. It explained the doctrinal justification for a "new and everlasting covenant." This called for the restoration of a form of polygamy modeled after the marriage practices of the Old Testament patriarchs and based on a larger conception of "celestial marriage" lasting for time and all eternity. Although some have charged otherwise, evidence from internal construction, contemporary Mormon and apostate statements and later affidavits strongly sug- gests that this statement, now printed as Section 132 of the current Utah Mormon version of the Doctrine and Covenants, was indeed dictated by Joseph Smith and represented a part of his carefully considered beliefs.2 Certainly the revelation is ex- tremely important for understanding later Utah Mormon marriage and family at- titudes.
    [Show full text]
  • Erence Material Have Been Indexed. Most Maps Are Not Indexed; Map Coordinates for Specific Locations Are Given in the Geographical Directory
    Index In addition to the documents themselves, introductory essays, annotation, and most ref- erence material have been indexed. Most maps are not indexed; map coordinates for specific locations are given in the Geographical Directory. Spelling, punctuation, and capitalization of quotations have been standardized. Personal names are listed by their correct spellings, not by variant spellings that may be found in the documents, unless the correct spelling is unknown. Entries for married women are generally listed under the names used during the period covered by the volume, with appropriate cross-references under maiden names or other married names. Unidentified individuals, such as “Sister Stathem,” are included in this index. In subentry text, Joseph Smith (JS) and Emma Smith (ES) are referred to by their initials. Recurring locations in the volume are referenced in subentries without state identifi- cation; these include Nauvoo, Quincy, and Hancock Co. (Ill.) and Kirtland (Ohio). When found in an entry, “id.” indicates an entry in the Biographical Directory or Geographical Directory or other text that summarizes the topic, “def.” refers to a passage that defines the topic, “illus.” indicates a photograph or other illustration, and “handwriting of” identifies documents that an individual inscribed. A 473 (illus.); church discipline of, xxvi, 322; Aaron (biblical figure), 29, 358–360 M. Connor identified as plural wife of, 321n231; Aaronic priesthood, 69n417, 358–360 debate in Boston with G. West, 18; deed to be Abel (biblical figure), 23, 30, 170 forwarded to J. Bernhisel by, 72, 72n431; di- Abolitionism and slavery, 130n736, 306n143, 354. vorce, desire for, 322n237; drunkenness, accus- See also Quincy abolitionists ing wife of, 322n237; handwriting of, 143, 468; Abraham (biblical figure), 23, 28–30, 33, 36, 161, O.
    [Show full text]
  • Entry 4323. the First Broadly Distributed Latter-Day Saint Chil- Dren's Book, a Catechism for Teaching Children the Doctrines of Mormonism
    Entry 4323. The first broadly distributed Latter-day Saint chil- dren's book, a catechism for teaching children the doctrines of Mormonism. From the Brigham Young University collection. J JACK,ELLEN E. 4299. Jack, Ellen E. The fate of a fairy. Chicago, M. A. 1898. Donogue & Co., c1910. Section on Mormonism by William H. Whitsitt. 213p. 20cm. illus. “Its [the Book of Mormon’s] literary form is repulsive A trip through southern Utah in Chapter IX with to the last degree, its thought is low and lacking in inter- emphasis on some polygamy episodes, p. 191–98. est.” NjP, NN, UHi, UPB, USlC DNC, DLC, MiU, PP, PPLT, PPPrHi 4300. Jackson, Helen Maria (Fiske) Hunt. Bits of travel 4304a. Jackson, Thomas. The Book of Mormon weighed in at home. By H. H. Boston, Roberts Brothers, 1878. the balances of the scriptures, and found wanting. A lecture vi, 413p. 15cm. front. delivered at Coalville, December 25, 1844. Leicester, [Eng.], Other editions: 1884 CSmH; 1887 USlC; 1888 CU; Printed for the author, by T. Cook, 1845. 1890 UPB; 1893 CU; 1900 UPB; 1904 DLC. 28p. 22cm. Impressions of Salt Lake City and the Mormons, UPB p. 17–27. CU-B, DLC, NjP, UHi, ULA, USlC, UU 4305. Jackson, William Henry. The pioneer photographer. Rocky Mountain adventures with a camera. By William H. 4301. Jackson, John Walker. Valuable miscellaneous books Jackson. In collaboration with Howard R. Driggs associate pro- including the library of Rev. J. W. Jackson . many scarce fessor of English teaching, New York University. Illustrated works on the Mormons; to be sold .
    [Show full text]
  • A New Look at the Alleged Little Known Discourse by Joseph Smith
    BYU Studies Quarterly Volume 9 Issue 1 Article 6 1-1-1969 A New Look at the Alleged Little Known Discourse by Joseph Smith Kenneth W. Godfrey Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq Recommended Citation Godfrey, Kenneth W. (1969) "A New Look at the Alleged Little Known Discourse by Joseph Smith," BYU Studies Quarterly: Vol. 9 : Iss. 1 , Article 6. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq/vol9/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Studies Quarterly by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Godfrey: A New Look at the Alleged Little Known Discourse by Joseph Smith A new look at the alleged little known discourse by joseph smith KENNETH W GODFREY only in comparatively recent times have mormon scholars taken a real interest in the authenticity of documents purport- edly written by early apostles prophets and other leaders of the church of jesus christ of latter day saints one of the latest forgeries that can now be proved beyond reasonable doubt to be just that is the so called little known discourse by joseph smith many thoughtful readers of this document have been troubled by its double standard of morality which speaks as an unfamiliar spirit when compared to the authen- tic writings of the prophet founder of mormonism supposedly given by the prophet joseph smith at nauvoo upon the subject of marriage
    [Show full text]
  • Vkbrown Thesis Final2
    THEMES IN AND COMPARISON OF SELECTED NEWSPAPER COVERAGE OF THE MORMON CONFLICT IN MISSOURI, 1831-1839 _______________________________________ A Thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri-Columbia _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts _____________________________________________________ by VICKI KNASEL BROWN Dr. Debra Mason, Thesis Supervisor DECEMBER 2014 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the thesis titled: THEMES IN AND COMPARISON OF SELECTED NEWSPAPER COVERAGE OF THE MORMON CONFLICT IN MISSOURI, 1831-1839 presented by Vicki Knasel Brown, a candidate for the degree of Master of Arts, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. __________________________ Dr. Debra Mason ___________________________________ Dr. Earnest Perry ___________________________________ Dr. Ryan Thomas ___________________________________ Dr. Richard Callahan To Dr. Debra Mason and Sue Schuermann with deepest respect and heartfelt gratitude. To the thesis committee: Dr. Debra Mason, Dr. Earnest Perry, Dr. Ryan Thomas, and Dr. Richard Callahan. Thanks for your encouragement. And to Calvin, Chris and Jennifer, and Kara and Bob. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I gratefully acknowledge the helpful staff of the Frank Lee Martin Journalism Library, especially Senior Library Specialist Sue Schuermann, for assistance with searches for appropriate materials. Thanks to the staffers at the State Historical Society of Missouri office on the MU campus who helped locate newspapers on microfilm and provided additional materials related to the Mormon conflict in Missouri. Also, I want to thank the staffers at the American Baptist Historical Society on the campus of Mercer University in Atlanta, Georgia, for help with finding Baptist newspapers.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Mormon History Vol. 33, No. 1, 2007
    Journal of Mormon History Volume 33 Issue 1 Article 1 2007 Journal of Mormon History Vol. 33, No. 1, 2007 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mormonhistory Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation (2007) "Journal of Mormon History Vol. 33, No. 1, 2007," Journal of Mormon History: Vol. 33 : Iss. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mormonhistory/vol33/iss1/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Mormon History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of Mormon History Vol. 33, No. 1, 2007 Table of Contents CONTENTS LETTERS • --Is This Academic Discourse? Dan Vogel, v • --“Tunnel Vision” D. Michael Quinn, xi PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS • -Toward a Mormon Sense of Time Philip L. Barlow, 1 TANNER LECTURE • --Historical Reflections on Mormon uturF es Stephen J. Stein, 39 ARTICLES • --The 1876 Journal of Frank Hammond: “Travailing” to the Little Colorado John J Hammond, 65 • --“Lonely Bones”: Leadership and Utah War Violence William P. MacKinnon, 121 • --Tensions in David O. McKay’s First Presidencies Gary James Bergera, 179 REVIEWS --Claudia L. Bushman, Contemporary Mormonism: Latter-day Saints in Modern America Glen M. Leonard, 247 --H. Michael Marquardt, The Rise of Mormonism, 1816–1844 Jed Woodworth, 252 --Leonard J. Arrington, Great Basin Kingdom: An Economic History of the Latter-day Saints, 1830-1900 Thomas G. Alexander, 257 --Fred E. Woods, Gathering to Nauvoo David E. Johnson, 260 --David L.
    [Show full text]
  • Ox ELDER LORE O/ Tlte J\Iuteieentu Geniusim
    -ox ELDER LORE o/ tlte J\IUteieentU GeniuSiM Published By The i Box Elder Chapter 979.242 \ Sons Of Utah Pioneers H2s 33t^ jgo* Clde*. 2o*e of the Nineteenth Century Published by the BOX ELDER CHAPTER SONS OF UTAH PIONEERS Adolph M. Reeder, President a* f Brigham City, Utah <<? September 1951 flfc» Copyright-, 1951 By Box Elder Chapter Sons Of Utah Pioneers Brigham City, Utah • Printed by Box Elder News & Journal Brigham City, Utah — 2^- / GOOD TIMBER 4 The tree that never had to fight For sun and sky and air and light $ That stood out in the open plain And always got its share of rain Never became a forest king. But lived and died a scrubby thing. The man who never had to toil Who never had to win his share Of sun and sky and light and air Never became a manly man, But lived and died as he began. Good timber does not grow in ease; The stronger wind, the tougher trees, The farther sky, the greater length; The more the storm, the more the strength; By sun and odd, by rain and snows In tree or man good timber grows Where thickest stands the forest growth We find the patriarchs of both. And they hold converse with the stars Whose branches show the scars Of many winds and much of strife This is the common law of life. — 3 — CONTENTS • Page Good Timber 3 Contents 4 Picture Index 5 Preface 7 Introduction 9 Chapter 1—A Great Adventure 13 Chapter 2—Sacajawea 19 Chapter 3—Henry's Fort on Snake River ..:.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Mormon History Vol. 23, No. 1, 1997
    Journal of Mormon History Volume 23 Issue 1 Article 1 1997 Journal of Mormon History Vol. 23, No. 1, 1997 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mormonhistory Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation (1997) "Journal of Mormon History Vol. 23, No. 1, 1997," Journal of Mormon History: Vol. 23 : Iss. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mormonhistory/vol23/iss1/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Mormon History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of Mormon History Vol. 23, No. 1, 1997 Table of Contents CONTENTS LETTERS vi ARTICLES PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS • --The Web of Print: Toward a History of the Book in Early Mormon Culture David J. Whittaker, 1 TANNER LECTURE • --National Perceptions of Utah's Statehood Howard R. Lamar, 42 • --St. Johns's Saints: Interethnic Conflict in Northeastern Arizona, 1880-85 Mark E. Miller, 66 • --LDS Sister Missionaries: An Oral History Response, 1910-71 Jessie L. Embry, 100 REVIEW ESSAY • --Issues in Writing European History and in Building the Church in Europe Review of Bruce A. Van Orden. Building Zion: The Latter-day Saints in Europe Wilfried Decoo, 140 REVIEWS --Dean L. May, Three Frontiers: Family, Land, and Society in the American West, 1850-1900 Charles S. Peterson, 177 --Irene M. Bates and E. Gary Smith, Lost Legacy: The Mormon Office of esidingPr Patriarch Craig L. Foster, 181 --A Gentile Account of Life in Utah's Dixie, 1872-73: Elizabeth Kane's St.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews 185
    Book Reviews 185 Book Reviews JOHN G. TURNER. Brigham Young: Pioneer Prophet. (Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2012, viii + 512 pp., illustrations, index, $35.00 hardback.) Reviewed by Gene A. Sessions To borrow from the old automobile com- mercial, this is not your father’s Brigham Young. Indeed, John Turner’s vision of Young suggests that barely a semblance of your father’s Brigham ever existed at all. After dubbing it “the standard biogra- phy” of the great Mormon leader, Library Journal said, “There aren’t enough super- latives for this book.” As if rising to that challenge, dust-jacket reviewers (including Phillip Barlow and Richard Bushman) lavished it with such effusive terms of praise as “wonderful,” “unsentimental, cogent, crit- ical, and fair,” “elegantly written,” “superb,” “meticulous,” “sophisticated,” and “at once informative, judicious, and profoundly en- gaging.” In the face of all this, a few readers, including this reviewer, are saying, “Not so fast.” While Turner has definitely made a major contribu- tion with this prolix and comprehensive attempt to capture the enigmatic and complicated “American Moses,” a careful analysis of the volume suggests that this may not be such a definitive and praiseworthy work after all. First of all, readers generally find themselves finishing this biography with a visceral dislike for its subject. Indeed, the overall effect of the book seems to be, as Doug Gibson noted in his column in the Ogden Standard- Examiner, that Young was “a great leader and an unpleasant man.” Again, most of that impression comes in the form of a gut feeling, but the causes of it are not that difficult to discern.
    [Show full text]
  • Woman's Image in Authoritative Mormon Discourse
    WOMAN'S IMAGE IN AUTHORITATIVE MORMON DISCOURSE: A RHETORICAL ANALYSIS by Vella Neil Evans A dissertation submitted to the faculty of The University of Utah in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Communication The University of Utah June 1985 WOMAN'S IMAGE IN AUTHORITATIVE MORMON DISCOURSE: A RHETORICAL ANALYSIS by Vella Neil Evans A dissertation submitted to the faculty of The University of Utah in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Communication The University of Utah June 1985 THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH GRADUATE SCHOOL SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE APPROVAL of a dissertation submitted by Valla Neil Evans This dissertation has been read by each member of the following supervisory committee and by majority vote has been found to be satisfactory. Chairman: Ma 1 co 11T1 0. Sil'lars righam D. Madsen -zj— j. Boy^r Jarvis ZJ U ffi / (ftS Lt/o/arcT C . Hawes Michael E. Pacanows<* THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH GRADUATE SCHOOL FINAL READING APPROVAL To the Graduate Council of The University of Utah: I have read the dissertation o f _________^________________gjVans___________ in its final form and have found that (1) its format, citations, and bibliographic style are consistent and acceptable; (2) its illustrative materials including figures, tables, and charts are in place; and (3) the final manuscript is satisfactory to the Supervisory Committee and is readv for submission to the Graduate School. • / . J M T .,_______ ..______ Date / Malcolm 0. Sillars Member. Supervisory Committee Approved for the Major Department Robert K. Tiemens Chairman Dean Approved for the Graduate Council James L.
    [Show full text]