DOCSLIB.ORG

Dod OIG Semiannual Report to the Congress October 1, 2012 Through

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dod OIG Semiannual Report to the Congress October 1, 2012 Through DoD IG Semiannual Report to the Congress -October 1, 2012 - March 31, 2013 - March 31, to Semiannual Report the 2012 Congress IG -October 1, DoD United States Department of Defense OCTOBERInspector 1, 2012 TO MARCH General 31, 2013 Semiannual Report to the Congress Required by Public Law 95-452 InteGrIty effIcIency accountabIlIty excellence InteGrIty effIcIency accountabIlIty excellence Mission Our mission is to provide independent, relevant, and timely over- sight of the Department that: supports the warfighter; promotes accountability, integrity, and efficiency; advises the Secretary of Defense and Congress; and informs the public. Vision Our vision is to be a model oversight organization in the federal government by leading change, speaking truth, and promoting ex- cellence; a diverse organization, working together as one profes- sional team, recognized as leaders in our field. Fraud, Waste and Abuse HOTLINE 1.800.424.9098 • www.dodig.mil/hotline For more information about whistleblower protection, please see the inside back cover. INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 4800 MARK CENTER DRIVE ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA 22350-1500 I am pleased to present the Department of Defense Inspector General Semiannual Report to Congress for the reporting period October 1, 2012, through March 31, 2013, issued in accordance with the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended. This year marks the 30th anniversary of DoD IG. Over the course of 30 years, many groundbreak- ing audits, inspections, and investigations have paved the way for reducing fraud, waste, and abuse across the Department. When you consider the projects we have completed over the past 30 years, the positive impact we have made on the Department is truly remarkable. In this report, we highlight a few of those significant projects completed during the reporting pe- riod to include: • Identifying government property valued at roughly $892.3 million that was not being valued or tracked in the Army accountability systems or on financial statements. • Investigating a prime DoD contractor for falsely claiming to be a service-disabled veteran owned small business. • Evaluating the Air Force Accident Investigation Board Report on the F-22A mishap of November 16, 2010, and identifying five deficiencies. • Assessing U.S. and coalition efforts to improve health care conditions and develop sustainable Afghan National Security Forces medical logistics at the Dawood National Military Hospital in Kabul, Afghanistan. Principal Deputy Inspector General In addition, we highlight the DoD Whistleblower Protection Program including our role in issuing Lynne M. Halbrooks. policy and procedures, and the appointment of a DoD whistleblower protection ombudsman. During this reporting period, we issued 64 reports and identified $1.3 billion in potential monetary benefits. DCIS investigations were the basis for 56 arrests, 102 criminal charges, 98 criminal convic- tions, 98 suspensions, and 95 debarments, as well as $1.6 billion returned to the government. The DoD Hotline fielded 16,615 contacts from the public and members of the DoD community. I would like to thank our counterparts who contributed to this report, including the Army Audit Agency, Naval Audit Service, Air Force Audit Agency, U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command, Naval Criminal Investigative Service, Air Force Office of Special Investigations, and the Defense Contract Audit Agency. In closing, I want to express my appreciation for the accomplishments of all DoD IG employees and the entire defense oversight community. As we continue to address efficiencies in the Department, I would once again like to thank the Department and Congress for their commitment to supporting the work of our office. Lynne M. Halbrooks Principal Deputy STATISTICAL HIGHLIGHTS SUMMARY OF AUDIT ACTIVITIES Reports Issued 50 Monetary Benefits Recommendations Made on Funds Put to Better Use $1 billion Achieved Monetary Benefits (Funds Put to Better Use) $932.8 million SUMMARY OF DEFENSE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE ACTIVITIES Total Returned to the U.S. Government1 $1.6 billion Recovered Government Property $5.2 million Civil Judgments/Settlements $898.6 million Criminal Fines, Penalties, Restitution and Forfeitures $717.8 million Administrative Recoveries2 $72.5 million Investigative Activities Arrests 56 Criminal Charges 102 Criminal Convictions 98 Suspensions 98 Debarments 95 SUMMARY OF ADMINISTRATIVE INVESTIGATIONS Complaints Received 695 Complaints Closed 534 Senior Official 256 Whistleblower Reprisal 278 SUMMARY OF POLICY AND OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES Existing and Proposed Regulations Reviewed 139 Evaluation Reports Issued 7 Inspector General Subpoenas Issued 309 Contractor Disclosures Received 86 Potential Monetary Benefits $249 million SUMMARY OF INTELLIGENCE AND SPECIAL PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS ACTIVITIES Reports Issued 4 SUMMARY OF SPECIAL PLANS AND OPERATIONS ACTIVITIES Assessment Reports Issued 3 SUMMARY OF DEFENSE HOTLINE ACTIVITIES Contacts 16,615 Cases Opened 1,499 Cases Closed 1,050 1 Includes investigations conducted jointly with other law enforcement organizations. 2 Includes contractual agreements and military non-judicial punishment. ii SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS CONTENTS 1. OVERVIEW MISSION & ORGANIZATION ..........................................................................................................................................2 MISSION ...............................................................................................................................................................2 ORGANIZATION ................................................................................................................................................3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................................4 OVERVIEW ...........................................................................................................................................................4 PRIORITIES ..........................................................................................................................................................4 CORE MISSION AREAS ....................................................................................................................................5 ENABLING MISSION AREAS ........................................................................................................................8 IG HIGHLIGHTS .....................................................................................................................................................................8 WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION PROGRAM: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE .............................8 2. CORE MISSION AREAS AUDITS .................................................................................................................................................................................. 12 ACQUISITION PROCESSES AND CONTRACT MANAGEMENT ......................................................12 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT .......................................................................................................................21 JOINT WARFIGHTING AND READINESS ...............................................................................................29 INFORMATION ASSURANCE, SECURITY AND PRIVACY .................................................................31 EQUIPPING AND TRAINING IRAQI AND AFGHAN SECURITY FORCES ....................................32 INVESTIGATIONS .............................................................................................................................................................. 35 PROCUREMENT FRAUD ..............................................................................................................................35 PUBLIC CORRUPTION ..................................................................................................................................36 PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION .........................................................................................................................39 HEALTH CARE FRAUD ..................................................................................................................................40 ILLEGAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER ........................................................................................................43 CYBER CRIME AND COMPUTER NETWORK INTRUSIONS ............................................................44 INSPECTIONS ..................................................................................................................................................................... 45 HEALTH AND SAFETY ..................................................................................................................................45 JOINT WARFIGHTING AND READINESS ...............................................................................................46 POLICY AND OVERSIGHT .............................................................................................................................................. 47 AUDIT POLICY AND OVERSIGHT .............................................................................................................47 INVESTIGATIVE POLICY AND OVERSIGHT ...........................................................................................48 TECHNICAL ASSESSMENTS .......................................................................................................................49
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Defense Security Cooperation University Expert Course of Instruction
    Defense Security Cooperation University Expert Course of Instruction Content, Design, Implementation JEFFERSON P. MARQUIS, JENNIFER D. P. MORONEY, PAULINE MOORE, REBECCA HERMAN, JONATHAN WELCH, REID DICKERSON Prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense Approved for public release NATIONAL DEFENSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RRA572-1 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface In its 2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), the U.S. Con- gress called for the professionalization of the security cooperation (SC) workforce as part of a range of reforms designed to confront perceived deficiencies in Department of Defense (DoD) SC planning, man- agement, execution, and assessment and placed the Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) in charge of this effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Fingerprint Card and Final Disposition Report Submissions by Military Service Law Enforcement Organizations
    Report No. DODIG-2018-035 U.S. Department of Defense InspectorDECEMBER 4, 2017 General Evaluation of Fingerprint Card and Final Disposition Report Submissions by Military Service Law Enforcement Organizations INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY ACCOUNTABILITY EXCELLENCE INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY ACCOUNTABILITY EXCELLENCE Mission Our mission is to provide independent, relevant, and timely oversight of the Department of Defense that supports the warfighter; promotes accountability, integrity, and efficiency; advises the Secretary of Defense and Congress; and informs the public. Vision Our vision is to be a model oversight organization in the Federal Government by leading change, speaking truth, and promoting excellence—a diverse organization, working together as one professional team, recognized as leaders in our field. Fraud, Waste, & Abuse HOTLINE Department of Defense dodig.mil/hotline|800.424.9098 For more information about whistleblower protection, please see the inside back cover. Evaluation of Fingerprint Card and Final Disposition Report ResultsSubmissions by in Military Brief Service Law Enforcement Organizations December 4, 2017 Findings (cont’d) Objective The FBI NGI database is a national computerized system for storing, comparing, and exchanging fingerprint data and The objective of our evaluation was to criminal history information for law enforcement purposes. determine whether all Military Services Law Enforcement Organizations (LEOs) The FBI NGI’s primary function is to provide the FBI a fully had submitted fingerprint cards and final automated fingerprint identification and criminal history disposition reports for Military Service reporting system. The failure to populate the NGI with all the members convicted by court-martial of required fingerprint records can allow someone to purchase qualifying offenses, as required by DoD a weapon who should not, hinder criminal investigations, instruction.
    [Show full text]
  • Response of the Turkish Government to the Report of the European
    CPT/Inf (2007) 8 Response of the Turkish Government to the report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on its visit to Turkey from 16 to 28 October 1994 The Turkish Government has authorised the publication of this response. The report of the CPT on its October 1994 visit to Turkey is set out in document CPT/Inf (2007) 7. Strasbourg, 11 January 2007 Note: In accordance with Article 11, paragraph 3, of the Convention, certain names have been deleted. - 3 - Response of the Turkish Government to the report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on its visit to Turkey from 16 to 28 October 1994 INTRODUCTION 1. Turkey has been a Party to the European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment since 1 February 1989 and has therefore been subject, since that date, to supervision by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT). Under the terms of the Convention the CPT has visited Turkey on the following dates: 9 - 21 September 1990 Ad hoc visit 29 September - 7 October 1991 Ad hoc visit 22 - 25 September 1992 Talks with officials 22 November - 3 December 1992 Periodic visit 7-9 December 1993 Top-level talks 16-28 October 1994 Periodic visit 2. At the close of the above-mentioned ad hoc and periodic visits the CPT drew up reports. On 21 December 1992, in accordance with Article 10, paragraph 2 of the Convention, it also issued a "Public Statement" on Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Informational Materials
    Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 06/06/2019 7:41:37 PM V. TURKISH REPUBLIC OF NORTHERN CYPRUS DEPUTY PRIME MINISTRY AND MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS 3 October 2018 Excellency. I have the honour to bring to your kind attention the recent attempts by the Greek Cypriot administration of Southern Cyprus to perpetuate the isolation of the Turkish Cypriot people in ail fields of life, which is poisoning the atmosphere between the two peoples on the island, particularly at a time when Your Excellency and the UN Security Council are calling upon the sides to proceed with Confidence Building Measures (CBMs). In this regard, the Greek Cypriot side has been aggressively pursuing a policy of defamation and misinformation regarding the Turkish Cypriot side. To provide a recent example, a series of letters have been sent to the maritime authorities of various countries in order to prevent any maritime interaction/trade between these countries and the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). The Greek Cypriot side has gone so far as to unilaterally deem our sea ports as “illegal”, and has been encouraging the said countries to issue penalties against their own shipping companies for cooperating in any way with or travelling to ports in North Cyprus. As known, the ports in the TRNC have not been deemed as illegal according to international law by any country or international organization, including the European Union. In this connection, 1 would like to refer to a statement by Mr. Olli Rehn, the then European Commissioner responsible for Enlargement, dated 17 October 2007 (E-4901/2007), which reads: "The Commission is aware that in 1974, the "government of the Republic of Cyprus ” has declared the sea ports in the northern part of Cyprus (Famagusta, Kyrenia, Karavostassi) prohibited and closed for all vessels.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Choices for a New Administration
    CHARTING A COURSE Strategic Choices for a New Administration a New for Choices Strategic Strategic Choices for a New Administration Edited by R.D. Hooker, Jr. Edited by R.D. Hooker, Jr. Strategic Choices for a New Administration Edited by R.D. Hooker, Jr. National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. December 2016 Published in the United States by National Defense University Press. Portions of this book may be quoted or reprinted without permission, provided that a standard source credit line is included. NDU Press would appreciate a courtesy copy of reprints or reviews. Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily rep- resent the views of the Department of State, Department of Defense, or any other agency of the Federal Government. Cleared for public release; distribution unlimited. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record of this publication may be found at the Library of Congress. National Defense University Press 260 Fifth Avenue (Building 64) Suite 2500 Fort Lesley J. McNair Washington, DC 20319 NDU Press publications are sold by the U.S. Government Printing Office. For ordering information, call (202) 512-1800 or write to the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Wash- ington, DC, 20402. For GPO publications online, access its Web site at: http://bookstore.gpo.gov. Book design by Marco Marchegiani, U.S. Government Printing Office Cover photo: Unarmed Minuteman III ICBM accelerates toward test range near Guam after launching from Vandenberg Air Force Base, March 27, 2015 (DOD) • iv • Contents Foreword .
    [Show full text]
  • European Bureau for Conscientious Objection to Military Service
    European Bureau for Conscientious Objection 35 Van Elewyck street, 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 648 5220, Fax: +32 2 648 6988 [email protected] / www.ebco-beoc.org Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Palais des Nations CH-1211 Geneva 10 Reference: OHCHR study on youth and human rights 11 January 2018 Dear Ms Imma Guerras-Delgado, On behalf of the European Bureau for Conscientious Objection (EBCO), I am pleased to send you the following contribution to the study on the implementation of human rights with regard to young people. First of all, the right to conscientious objection to military service is a human right that concerns young people, more than other groups. Indeed, the age that young women and men receive the first call up for the compulsory military service is around 18 years old. Despite this, only the Ibero-American Youth Convention recognises explicitly the right to conscientious objection as a youth right. Its article 12 states as follows: “1. Youth have the right to make conscientious objection towards obligatory military service. 2. The States Parties undertake to promote the pertinent legal measures to guarantee the exercise of this right and advance in the progressive elimination of the obligatory military service. 3. The States Parties undertake to assure youth under 18 years of age that they shall not be called up or involved, in any way, in military hostilities.” At UN level, the right to conscientious objection to military service is based on article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which guarantees the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion or belief.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracking Conflict Worldwide
    CRISISWATCH Tracking Conflict Worldwide CrisisWatch is our global conict tracker, a tool designed to help decision-makers prevent deadly violence by keeping them up-to-date with developments in over 70 conicts and crises, identifying trends and alerting them to risks of escalation and opportunities to advance peace. Learn more about CrisisWatch July 2021 Global Overview JULY 2021 Trends for Last Month July 2021 Outlook for This Month DETERIORATED SITUATIONS August 2021 Ethiopia, South Africa, Zambia, CONFLICT RISK ALERTS Afghanistan, Bosnia And Herzegovina, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Ukraine, Ethiopia, Zambia, Armenia, Azerbaijan Cuba, Haiti, Syria, Tunisia RESOLUTION OPPORTUNITIES IMPROVED SITUATIONS None Central African Republic, Côte d’Ivoire CrisisWatch warns of three conict risks in August. Ethiopia’s spreading Tigray war is spiraling into a dangerous new phase, which will likely lead to more deadly violence and far greater instability countrywide. Fighting along the state border between Armenia and Azerbaijan, the deadliest since the Autumn 2020 war, could escalate further. More violence could surge in Zambia as tensions between ruling party and opposition supporters are running high ahead of the 12 August general elections. Our monthly conict tracker highlights deteriorations in thirteen countries in July. The Taliban continued its major offensive in Afghanistan, seizing more international border crossings and launching its rst assault on Kandahar city since 2001. South Africa faced its most violent unrest since apartheid ended in 1991, leaving over 300 dead. The killing of President Jovenel Moïse in murky circumstances plunged Haiti into political turmoil. Tunisia’s months-long political crisis escalated when President Kaïs Saïed dismissed Prime Minister Hichem Mechichi and suspended parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace World
    Aerospace World By Peter Grier F-22 Flies Cross-Country On Aug. 26, Raptor 4002, the second F-22 fighter, flew nonstop from Dob- bins ARB, Ga., to Edwards AFB, Calif., where it joined the first F-22—Raptor 4001—for flight testing. Arrival of 4002 at Edwards repre- sents the USAF fighter program’s next USAF photo by SrA. LeachJustinW. major flight test milestone. To date, the program has met all its requirements, DoD said. Many have been met earlier than expected. Taken together, Raptors 4001 and 4002 have flown 39 test flights totaling 59.4 hours at Edwards and Dobbins. Thus far, F-22 test pilots have flown at altitudes up to 40,000 feet, at 16 degrees angle of attack, and at .95 Mach. The Air Force plans to buy 339 of the stealthy, supercruising fighters to replace the F-15 as the world’s premier Defense Secretary William Cohen leans close to catch the words of A1C Mitchell D. air superiority fighter. Vance, a 41st Rescue Squadron pararescueman at Moody AFB, Ga. Many airmen expressed concerns about the ongoing pace of deployments. Visit to Moody Opens Cohen’s Eyes Defense Secretary William S. Co hen Cohen declared that the problem was in the Red Sea and the Arabian Sea. spent Aug. 17 at Moody AFB, Ga., get- serious and that DoD is determined to US officials said the weapons caused ting an up-close look at problems the do something about it. “moderate to heavy” damage. One of military is facing and why many officers the TLAMs went off course and fell into and airmen are leaving the service.
    [Show full text]
  • SEPTEMBER 2010 4 Oct.Indd
    The Three Swords Magazine 18/2010 1 JWC Public Affairs Office Cover _ French Air Force PO Box 8080, Eikesetveien General Stéphane Abrial, 4068 Stavanger, Norway Commander of NATO’s Allied Tel: +(47) 52 87 9130/9131/9132 Command Transformation Internet: www.jwc.nato.int (ACT). Collage by SSG Brandon Chhoeun, USA A, Assistant Technician, Media Simulation Section, Joint Warfare Centre. Dear Reader, I heartily welcome you, all the new members is, however, that they bring some pretty bad weather, exactly the kind of the JWC, and wish you all the best for your that locals love! The snow skiing season is not far away either… Ski- endeavours, hoping that your transition will ing is synonymous with fun, fitness, and freedom as it takes you away bring you and your family much fun and sat- from the daily grind. Skiing is playing with acceleration and centrifugal isfaction in Norway. Some of you may already forces. It is also the ultimate thrill, provided you get the rhythm of it have gained a first impression of the Nordic and let go of any thoughts or feelings that may hold you back. At its summer, which never fails to create a fairytale best, it feels like pure bliss. A ski boat takes Stavanger skiers and snow- atmosphere of endless days and nights soft as boarders at express pace (less than two hours) from the Skagenkaien velvet. If, like many Norwegians, you appreci- Quay to the Sauda Skiing Centre, one of the major skiing arenas of ate eating in idyllic outdoor dining spots, maybe chatting away with West Norway.
    [Show full text]
  • Das Deutsche Engagement Bei Der Sicherheitsreform in Afghanistan Am Beispiel Des Polizeiaufbaus
    IFSH Manfred Permanseder Das deutsche Engagement bei der Sicherheitssektorreform in Afghanistan am Beispiel des Polizeiaufbaus Reformkonzept oder Etikettenschwindel? Working Paper 5 | November 2013 Institut für Friedensforschung und Sicherheitspolitik an der Universität Hamburg/ Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg Beim Schlump 83, 20144 Hamburg Tel: +49 40 866 077-0 - Fax: +49 40 866 36 15 Über ZEUS Nach Problemfeldern gliedert sich das IFSH in drei Arbeitsbereiche. Das Zentrum für Euro- päische Friedens- und Sicherheitsstudien (ZEUS) legt seinen Schwerpunkt auf Untersuchun- gen über die konzeptionelle und operative Gestaltung des Beitrages der Europäischen Union zur Stärkung von Frieden und Sicherheit in den Wirkungsfeldern der Gemeinsamen Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik diesseits wie jenseits der Grenzen der Union. Kontakt: Hans-Georg Ehrhart, [email protected] Über den Autor Manfred Permanseder ist Stabsoffizier der Bundeswehr und zurzeit Referent im Auswärtigen Amt. Er hat ein Studium der Politikwissenschaften an der Universität der Bundeswehr in Hamburg absolviert, einen Master of Science in Militärwissenschaften am „Command and Staff College“ in Quetta, Pakistan erhalten und im Jahr 2013 einen Master of Arts im Rah- men des Postgraduiertenstudiengangs „Peace and Security Studies“ am Institut für Friedens- forschung und Sicherheitspolitik an der Universität Hamburg verliehen bekommen. Manfred Permanseder war in nationalen und multinationalen Verwendungen insbesondere im Bereich der Sicherheitspolitik
    [Show full text]
  • Bahrain Defence Force CLEAN
    The Bahrain Defence Force: The Monarchy’s Second-to- Last Line of Defense By Zoltan Barany Senior Associate, CSIS Burke Chair December 9, 2016 Please provide comments to [email protected] Photo credit: JOSEPH EID/AFP/Getty Images Barany: Bahrain Defense Force 2 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 4 PART I. THE MONARCHY AND THE BDF ..................................................................................... 4 The BDF’s Place in the State and Regime .............................................................................. 6 The Royal Family .................................................................................................................... 6 The State and the BDF ............................................................................................................ 8 Mission #1: Defending the Monarchy ..................................................................................... 9 THE ARMY AND ITS EFFECTIVENESS AND AT HOME AND ABROAD .......................................... 12 Economic Aspects: Budgets, Size, Weapons ......................................................................... 12 The 1981 Coup Attempt and Its Impact on the BDF ............................................................. 14 BDF Deployments and Military Cooperation ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Threat Tactics Report: ISIL
    FEB 2016 Version 1.6 TThhrreeaatt TTaaccttiiccss RReeppoorrtt:: IIssllaammiicc SSttaattee ooff IIrraaqq aanndd tthhee LLeevvaanntt TRADOC G-2 ACE Threats Integration DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Threat Tactics Report: ISIL Executive Summary ISIL is an evolution of an insurgent group that has changed its name to reflect an increasing geographic vision. ISIL’s advantage to date has been an increasingly large number of fighters and deep cash reserves to fund its operations. This provides greater capacity to organize, train, and equip like a military organization. ISIL executes military tactics to the best of its capability. This is a greater capability than that shown by previous insurgencies in the area, but still not best practice in a number of warfighting functions and key tasks. High value targets for ISIL have included such infrastructure as dams and oil refineries, which also contribute to its cash flow. Social media use has reached a new level of refinement. ISIL’s rapid mobility, due to control of key lines of communication (LOCs) in Eastern Syria, is a key strength of the group.1 ISIL’s command and control is superior to most other insurgent groups in Iraq and Syria.2 ISIL’s command and control is being negatively impacted by coalition airstrikes; however, it has developed techniques such as tunnels to adapt.* Fluctuations and reductions in revenue sources, such as oil, have been disruptive. ISIL is escalating to higher levels the violent images it distributes via social media. While ISIL’s momentum in Iraq and Syria has been stalled, its direct and indirect influence internationally has contributed to its ongoing narrative of a worldwide caliphate.
    [Show full text]