Defense Security Cooperation University Expert Course of Instruction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Defense Security Cooperation University Expert Course of Instruction Defense Security Cooperation University Expert Course of Instruction Content, Design, Implementation JEFFERSON P. MARQUIS, JENNIFER D. P. MORONEY, PAULINE MOORE, REBECCA HERMAN, JONATHAN WELCH, REID DICKERSON Prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense Approved for public release NATIONAL DEFENSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RRA572-1 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface In its 2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), the U.S. Con- gress called for the professionalization of the security cooperation (SC) workforce as part of a range of reforms designed to confront perceived deficiencies in Department of Defense (DoD) SC planning, man- agement, execution, and assessment and placed the Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) in charge of this effort. Accordingly, DSCA established a Security Cooperation Workforce Certification Program (SCWCP) in January 2020, which codified SC competen- cies and areas of concentration (AOC) for the approximately 20,000 civilian and military officials in SC workforce positions and estab- lished four proficiency levels that reflect increasing responsibility and greater knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSA). DSCA asked the RAND National Defense Research Institute (NDRI) to help develop training course requirements for expert professionals that would cap- ture what they need to know regarding the integration of SC into the national security framework. The RAND study team undertook four research tasks in pursuit of this objective. To identify training requirements for SC experts, we reviewed the SC academic and policy literature, conducted interviews and discussions with SC subject-matter experts (SMEs), and conducted case studies of existing SC courses. To identify best practices in senior leader education and training outside DoD, we reviewed relevant aca- demic and business literature, interviewed adult education SMEs, and conducted case studies of executive education programs. Based on this research, we outlined an SC expert course of instruction (COI), to include course objectives, associated design elements, estimated duration iii iv Defense Security Cooperation University Expert Course of Instruction and cost considerations; and recommended options for implementing the COI that accounted for DSCA priorities and constraints. This study may be of interest to SC policymakers, educators, prac- titioners, and researchers, as well as U.S. government officials who focus on DoD personnel training, education, and professional development. The research reported here was completed in August 2020 and underwent security review with the sponsor and the Defense Office of Prepublication and Security Review before public release. This research was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense’s DSCA and conducted within the Forces and Resources Policy Center and the International Security and Defense Policy Center of the RAND National Security Research Division (NSRD), which operates the NDRI, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense intelligence enterprise. For more information on the RAND Forces and Resources Policy Center, see www.rand.org/nsrd/frp or contact the director (contact infor- mation is provided on the webpage). For more information on the RAND International and Defense Policy Center, see www.rand.org/nsrd/isdp or contact the director (contact information is provided on the webpage). Contents Preface ............................................................................. iii Figures and Tables ...............................................................vii Summary .......................................................................... ix Acknowledgments ............................................................. xvii Abbreviations .................................................................... xix CHAPTER ONE Introduction ....................................................................... 1 Defense Security Cooperation University’s New Certification Program .... 3 Principles Guiding the Study ..................................................... 6 Key Issues ........................................................................... 6 Study Approach ...................................................................12 Study Limitations .................................................................12 Report Organization ..............................................................13 CHAPTER TWO Review of the Policy and Academic Literature for Security Cooperation Professional Training and Education ..................15 Security Cooperation Legislation and Policy Guidance ......................15 Security Cooperation Literature on Training and Educating Security Cooperation Professionals ...................................................21 Conclusion ........................................................................ 30 CHAPTER THREE Interviews and Discussions with Security Cooperation Subject-Matter Experts ....................................................31 Interview Participants ............................................................32 v vi Defense Security Cooperation University Expert Course of Instruction Interview Protocol and Coding .................................................33 Findings ........................................................................... 34 Conclusion ........................................................................ 46 CHAPTER FOUR Best Practices in Subject-Matter-Expert Training and Education......49 Review of the Academic and Professional Training and Education Literature ..................................................................... 50 Interviews Related to Subject-Matter-Expert Training and Education ...57 Findings ............................................................................59 Case Studies Relevant to Security Cooperation Expert Education and Training .......................................................................63 Case Study Methodology ....................................................... 64 Conclusion .........................................................................70 CHAPTER FIVE Security Cooperation Expert Course of Instruction and Ways to Implement It .................................................................73 Potential Security Cooperation Expert Learning Objectives Distilled from Subject-Matter Expert Interviews, Case Studies, and Prior Research ................................................................74 Developing Course Design Recommendations and Considering Time and Cost ................................................................76 An Ideal Professionalization Program to Develop Experts Could Require Substantial Investment ............................................82 Seven Strategic Choices to Ponder Related to Expert Education ........... 84 Additional Challenges Posed by COVID-19 ..................................89 Conclusion ........................................................................ 90 APPENDIXES A. Interview Protocols .........................................................93 B. Case Study Recommendations for Security Cooperation Expert Course ............................................................. 103 C. Methodology for Cross-Sector Literature Review and Department of Defense and Non–Department of Defense Subject-Matter Expert Interviews ..................................... 109 D. Case Study Summaries................................................... 117 References ....................................................................... 163 Figures and Tables Figures S.1. Proposed Organization and Flow of Security Cooperation Expert-Level Course ............................................... xiv 1.1. “T-Shaped” Leader: Distinguishing Among Expert, Advanced, and Executive Levels of Security Cooperation Professionals ........................................................... 8 1.2. Bloom’s Taxonomy .................................................... 9 3.1. Percentage of Interviewed Senior Security Officials and Subject-Matter Experts by Organization ..........................33 3.2. Number of Security Cooperation
Recommended publications
  • Dod OIG Semiannual Report to the Congress October 1, 2012 Through
    DoD IG Semiannual Report to the Congress -October 1, 2012 - March 31, 2013 - March 31, to Semiannual Report the 2012 Congress IG -October 1, DoD United States Department of Defense OCTOBERInspector 1, 2012 TO MARCH General 31, 2013 Semiannual Report to the Congress Required by Public Law 95-452 InteGrIty effIcIency accountabIlIty excellence InteGrIty effIcIency accountabIlIty excellence Mission Our mission is to provide independent, relevant, and timely over- sight of the Department that: supports the warfighter; promotes accountability, integrity, and efficiency; advises the Secretary of Defense and Congress; and informs the public. Vision Our vision is to be a model oversight organization in the federal government by leading change, speaking truth, and promoting ex- cellence; a diverse organization, working together as one profes- sional team, recognized as leaders in our field. Fraud, Waste and Abuse HOTLINE 1.800.424.9098 • www.dodig.mil/hotline For more information about whistleblower protection, please see the inside back cover. INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 4800 MARK CENTER DRIVE ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA 22350-1500 I am pleased to present the Department of Defense Inspector General Semiannual Report to Congress for the reporting period October 1, 2012, through March 31, 2013, issued in accordance with the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended. This year marks the 30th anniversary of DoD IG. Over the course of 30 years, many groundbreak- ing audits, inspections, and investigations have paved the way for reducing fraud, waste, and abuse across the Department. When you consider the projects we have completed over the past 30 years, the positive impact we have made on the Department is truly remarkable.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Fingerprint Card and Final Disposition Report Submissions by Military Service Law Enforcement Organizations
    Report No. DODIG-2018-035 U.S. Department of Defense InspectorDECEMBER 4, 2017 General Evaluation of Fingerprint Card and Final Disposition Report Submissions by Military Service Law Enforcement Organizations INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY ACCOUNTABILITY EXCELLENCE INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY ACCOUNTABILITY EXCELLENCE Mission Our mission is to provide independent, relevant, and timely oversight of the Department of Defense that supports the warfighter; promotes accountability, integrity, and efficiency; advises the Secretary of Defense and Congress; and informs the public. Vision Our vision is to be a model oversight organization in the Federal Government by leading change, speaking truth, and promoting excellence—a diverse organization, working together as one professional team, recognized as leaders in our field. Fraud, Waste, & Abuse HOTLINE Department of Defense dodig.mil/hotline|800.424.9098 For more information about whistleblower protection, please see the inside back cover. Evaluation of Fingerprint Card and Final Disposition Report ResultsSubmissions by in Military Brief Service Law Enforcement Organizations December 4, 2017 Findings (cont’d) Objective The FBI NGI database is a national computerized system for storing, comparing, and exchanging fingerprint data and The objective of our evaluation was to criminal history information for law enforcement purposes. determine whether all Military Services Law Enforcement Organizations (LEOs) The FBI NGI’s primary function is to provide the FBI a fully had submitted fingerprint cards and final automated fingerprint identification and criminal history disposition reports for Military Service reporting system. The failure to populate the NGI with all the members convicted by court-martial of required fingerprint records can allow someone to purchase qualifying offenses, as required by DoD a weapon who should not, hinder criminal investigations, instruction.
    [Show full text]
  • Response of the Turkish Government to the Report of the European
    CPT/Inf (2007) 8 Response of the Turkish Government to the report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on its visit to Turkey from 16 to 28 October 1994 The Turkish Government has authorised the publication of this response. The report of the CPT on its October 1994 visit to Turkey is set out in document CPT/Inf (2007) 7. Strasbourg, 11 January 2007 Note: In accordance with Article 11, paragraph 3, of the Convention, certain names have been deleted. - 3 - Response of the Turkish Government to the report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on its visit to Turkey from 16 to 28 October 1994 INTRODUCTION 1. Turkey has been a Party to the European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment since 1 February 1989 and has therefore been subject, since that date, to supervision by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT). Under the terms of the Convention the CPT has visited Turkey on the following dates: 9 - 21 September 1990 Ad hoc visit 29 September - 7 October 1991 Ad hoc visit 22 - 25 September 1992 Talks with officials 22 November - 3 December 1992 Periodic visit 7-9 December 1993 Top-level talks 16-28 October 1994 Periodic visit 2. At the close of the above-mentioned ad hoc and periodic visits the CPT drew up reports. On 21 December 1992, in accordance with Article 10, paragraph 2 of the Convention, it also issued a "Public Statement" on Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Informational Materials
    Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 06/06/2019 7:41:37 PM V. TURKISH REPUBLIC OF NORTHERN CYPRUS DEPUTY PRIME MINISTRY AND MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS 3 October 2018 Excellency. I have the honour to bring to your kind attention the recent attempts by the Greek Cypriot administration of Southern Cyprus to perpetuate the isolation of the Turkish Cypriot people in ail fields of life, which is poisoning the atmosphere between the two peoples on the island, particularly at a time when Your Excellency and the UN Security Council are calling upon the sides to proceed with Confidence Building Measures (CBMs). In this regard, the Greek Cypriot side has been aggressively pursuing a policy of defamation and misinformation regarding the Turkish Cypriot side. To provide a recent example, a series of letters have been sent to the maritime authorities of various countries in order to prevent any maritime interaction/trade between these countries and the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). The Greek Cypriot side has gone so far as to unilaterally deem our sea ports as “illegal”, and has been encouraging the said countries to issue penalties against their own shipping companies for cooperating in any way with or travelling to ports in North Cyprus. As known, the ports in the TRNC have not been deemed as illegal according to international law by any country or international organization, including the European Union. In this connection, 1 would like to refer to a statement by Mr. Olli Rehn, the then European Commissioner responsible for Enlargement, dated 17 October 2007 (E-4901/2007), which reads: "The Commission is aware that in 1974, the "government of the Republic of Cyprus ” has declared the sea ports in the northern part of Cyprus (Famagusta, Kyrenia, Karavostassi) prohibited and closed for all vessels.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Choices for a New Administration
    CHARTING A COURSE Strategic Choices for a New Administration a New for Choices Strategic Strategic Choices for a New Administration Edited by R.D. Hooker, Jr. Edited by R.D. Hooker, Jr. Strategic Choices for a New Administration Edited by R.D. Hooker, Jr. National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. December 2016 Published in the United States by National Defense University Press. Portions of this book may be quoted or reprinted without permission, provided that a standard source credit line is included. NDU Press would appreciate a courtesy copy of reprints or reviews. Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily rep- resent the views of the Department of State, Department of Defense, or any other agency of the Federal Government. Cleared for public release; distribution unlimited. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record of this publication may be found at the Library of Congress. National Defense University Press 260 Fifth Avenue (Building 64) Suite 2500 Fort Lesley J. McNair Washington, DC 20319 NDU Press publications are sold by the U.S. Government Printing Office. For ordering information, call (202) 512-1800 or write to the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Wash- ington, DC, 20402. For GPO publications online, access its Web site at: http://bookstore.gpo.gov. Book design by Marco Marchegiani, U.S. Government Printing Office Cover photo: Unarmed Minuteman III ICBM accelerates toward test range near Guam after launching from Vandenberg Air Force Base, March 27, 2015 (DOD) • iv • Contents Foreword .
    [Show full text]
  • European Bureau for Conscientious Objection to Military Service
    European Bureau for Conscientious Objection 35 Van Elewyck street, 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 648 5220, Fax: +32 2 648 6988 [email protected] / www.ebco-beoc.org Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Palais des Nations CH-1211 Geneva 10 Reference: OHCHR study on youth and human rights 11 January 2018 Dear Ms Imma Guerras-Delgado, On behalf of the European Bureau for Conscientious Objection (EBCO), I am pleased to send you the following contribution to the study on the implementation of human rights with regard to young people. First of all, the right to conscientious objection to military service is a human right that concerns young people, more than other groups. Indeed, the age that young women and men receive the first call up for the compulsory military service is around 18 years old. Despite this, only the Ibero-American Youth Convention recognises explicitly the right to conscientious objection as a youth right. Its article 12 states as follows: “1. Youth have the right to make conscientious objection towards obligatory military service. 2. The States Parties undertake to promote the pertinent legal measures to guarantee the exercise of this right and advance in the progressive elimination of the obligatory military service. 3. The States Parties undertake to assure youth under 18 years of age that they shall not be called up or involved, in any way, in military hostilities.” At UN level, the right to conscientious objection to military service is based on article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which guarantees the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion or belief.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracking Conflict Worldwide
    CRISISWATCH Tracking Conflict Worldwide CrisisWatch is our global conict tracker, a tool designed to help decision-makers prevent deadly violence by keeping them up-to-date with developments in over 70 conicts and crises, identifying trends and alerting them to risks of escalation and opportunities to advance peace. Learn more about CrisisWatch July 2021 Global Overview JULY 2021 Trends for Last Month July 2021 Outlook for This Month DETERIORATED SITUATIONS August 2021 Ethiopia, South Africa, Zambia, CONFLICT RISK ALERTS Afghanistan, Bosnia And Herzegovina, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Ukraine, Ethiopia, Zambia, Armenia, Azerbaijan Cuba, Haiti, Syria, Tunisia RESOLUTION OPPORTUNITIES IMPROVED SITUATIONS None Central African Republic, Côte d’Ivoire CrisisWatch warns of three conict risks in August. Ethiopia’s spreading Tigray war is spiraling into a dangerous new phase, which will likely lead to more deadly violence and far greater instability countrywide. Fighting along the state border between Armenia and Azerbaijan, the deadliest since the Autumn 2020 war, could escalate further. More violence could surge in Zambia as tensions between ruling party and opposition supporters are running high ahead of the 12 August general elections. Our monthly conict tracker highlights deteriorations in thirteen countries in July. The Taliban continued its major offensive in Afghanistan, seizing more international border crossings and launching its rst assault on Kandahar city since 2001. South Africa faced its most violent unrest since apartheid ended in 1991, leaving over 300 dead. The killing of President Jovenel Moïse in murky circumstances plunged Haiti into political turmoil. Tunisia’s months-long political crisis escalated when President Kaïs Saïed dismissed Prime Minister Hichem Mechichi and suspended parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace World
    Aerospace World By Peter Grier F-22 Flies Cross-Country On Aug. 26, Raptor 4002, the second F-22 fighter, flew nonstop from Dob- bins ARB, Ga., to Edwards AFB, Calif., where it joined the first F-22—Raptor 4001—for flight testing. Arrival of 4002 at Edwards repre- sents the USAF fighter program’s next USAF photo by SrA. LeachJustinW. major flight test milestone. To date, the program has met all its requirements, DoD said. Many have been met earlier than expected. Taken together, Raptors 4001 and 4002 have flown 39 test flights totaling 59.4 hours at Edwards and Dobbins. Thus far, F-22 test pilots have flown at altitudes up to 40,000 feet, at 16 degrees angle of attack, and at .95 Mach. The Air Force plans to buy 339 of the stealthy, supercruising fighters to replace the F-15 as the world’s premier Defense Secretary William Cohen leans close to catch the words of A1C Mitchell D. air superiority fighter. Vance, a 41st Rescue Squadron pararescueman at Moody AFB, Ga. Many airmen expressed concerns about the ongoing pace of deployments. Visit to Moody Opens Cohen’s Eyes Defense Secretary William S. Co hen Cohen declared that the problem was in the Red Sea and the Arabian Sea. spent Aug. 17 at Moody AFB, Ga., get- serious and that DoD is determined to US officials said the weapons caused ting an up-close look at problems the do something about it. “moderate to heavy” damage. One of military is facing and why many officers the TLAMs went off course and fell into and airmen are leaving the service.
    [Show full text]
  • SEPTEMBER 2010 4 Oct.Indd
    The Three Swords Magazine 18/2010 1 JWC Public Affairs Office Cover _ French Air Force PO Box 8080, Eikesetveien General Stéphane Abrial, 4068 Stavanger, Norway Commander of NATO’s Allied Tel: +(47) 52 87 9130/9131/9132 Command Transformation Internet: www.jwc.nato.int (ACT). Collage by SSG Brandon Chhoeun, USA A, Assistant Technician, Media Simulation Section, Joint Warfare Centre. Dear Reader, I heartily welcome you, all the new members is, however, that they bring some pretty bad weather, exactly the kind of the JWC, and wish you all the best for your that locals love! The snow skiing season is not far away either… Ski- endeavours, hoping that your transition will ing is synonymous with fun, fitness, and freedom as it takes you away bring you and your family much fun and sat- from the daily grind. Skiing is playing with acceleration and centrifugal isfaction in Norway. Some of you may already forces. It is also the ultimate thrill, provided you get the rhythm of it have gained a first impression of the Nordic and let go of any thoughts or feelings that may hold you back. At its summer, which never fails to create a fairytale best, it feels like pure bliss. A ski boat takes Stavanger skiers and snow- atmosphere of endless days and nights soft as boarders at express pace (less than two hours) from the Skagenkaien velvet. If, like many Norwegians, you appreci- Quay to the Sauda Skiing Centre, one of the major skiing arenas of ate eating in idyllic outdoor dining spots, maybe chatting away with West Norway.
    [Show full text]
  • Das Deutsche Engagement Bei Der Sicherheitsreform in Afghanistan Am Beispiel Des Polizeiaufbaus
    IFSH Manfred Permanseder Das deutsche Engagement bei der Sicherheitssektorreform in Afghanistan am Beispiel des Polizeiaufbaus Reformkonzept oder Etikettenschwindel? Working Paper 5 | November 2013 Institut für Friedensforschung und Sicherheitspolitik an der Universität Hamburg/ Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg Beim Schlump 83, 20144 Hamburg Tel: +49 40 866 077-0 - Fax: +49 40 866 36 15 Über ZEUS Nach Problemfeldern gliedert sich das IFSH in drei Arbeitsbereiche. Das Zentrum für Euro- päische Friedens- und Sicherheitsstudien (ZEUS) legt seinen Schwerpunkt auf Untersuchun- gen über die konzeptionelle und operative Gestaltung des Beitrages der Europäischen Union zur Stärkung von Frieden und Sicherheit in den Wirkungsfeldern der Gemeinsamen Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik diesseits wie jenseits der Grenzen der Union. Kontakt: Hans-Georg Ehrhart, [email protected] Über den Autor Manfred Permanseder ist Stabsoffizier der Bundeswehr und zurzeit Referent im Auswärtigen Amt. Er hat ein Studium der Politikwissenschaften an der Universität der Bundeswehr in Hamburg absolviert, einen Master of Science in Militärwissenschaften am „Command and Staff College“ in Quetta, Pakistan erhalten und im Jahr 2013 einen Master of Arts im Rah- men des Postgraduiertenstudiengangs „Peace and Security Studies“ am Institut für Friedens- forschung und Sicherheitspolitik an der Universität Hamburg verliehen bekommen. Manfred Permanseder war in nationalen und multinationalen Verwendungen insbesondere im Bereich der Sicherheitspolitik
    [Show full text]
  • Bahrain Defence Force CLEAN
    The Bahrain Defence Force: The Monarchy’s Second-to- Last Line of Defense By Zoltan Barany Senior Associate, CSIS Burke Chair December 9, 2016 Please provide comments to [email protected] Photo credit: JOSEPH EID/AFP/Getty Images Barany: Bahrain Defense Force 2 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 4 PART I. THE MONARCHY AND THE BDF ..................................................................................... 4 The BDF’s Place in the State and Regime .............................................................................. 6 The Royal Family .................................................................................................................... 6 The State and the BDF ............................................................................................................ 8 Mission #1: Defending the Monarchy ..................................................................................... 9 THE ARMY AND ITS EFFECTIVENESS AND AT HOME AND ABROAD .......................................... 12 Economic Aspects: Budgets, Size, Weapons ......................................................................... 12 The 1981 Coup Attempt and Its Impact on the BDF ............................................................. 14 BDF Deployments and Military Cooperation ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Threat Tactics Report: ISIL
    FEB 2016 Version 1.6 TThhrreeaatt TTaaccttiiccss RReeppoorrtt:: IIssllaammiicc SSttaattee ooff IIrraaqq aanndd tthhee LLeevvaanntt TRADOC G-2 ACE Threats Integration DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Threat Tactics Report: ISIL Executive Summary ISIL is an evolution of an insurgent group that has changed its name to reflect an increasing geographic vision. ISIL’s advantage to date has been an increasingly large number of fighters and deep cash reserves to fund its operations. This provides greater capacity to organize, train, and equip like a military organization. ISIL executes military tactics to the best of its capability. This is a greater capability than that shown by previous insurgencies in the area, but still not best practice in a number of warfighting functions and key tasks. High value targets for ISIL have included such infrastructure as dams and oil refineries, which also contribute to its cash flow. Social media use has reached a new level of refinement. ISIL’s rapid mobility, due to control of key lines of communication (LOCs) in Eastern Syria, is a key strength of the group.1 ISIL’s command and control is superior to most other insurgent groups in Iraq and Syria.2 ISIL’s command and control is being negatively impacted by coalition airstrikes; however, it has developed techniques such as tunnels to adapt.* Fluctuations and reductions in revenue sources, such as oil, have been disruptive. ISIL is escalating to higher levels the violent images it distributes via social media. While ISIL’s momentum in Iraq and Syria has been stalled, its direct and indirect influence internationally has contributed to its ongoing narrative of a worldwide caliphate.
    [Show full text]