DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix a – Lds Critiera for Selected Regions of the Study Area

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix a – Lds Critiera for Selected Regions of the Study Area APPENDIX A – LDS CRITIERA FOR SELECTED REGIONS OF THE STUDY AREA. Calcareous Geology-Dominated Streams Size 1 Size 2 Size 3 Size 4 Reference Criterion (0-3 mi2 watershed area) (4-10 mi2 watershed area) (11-100 mi2 watershed area) (100+ mi2 watershed area) Catchment developed (%) <= 1 <= 2.4 <= 2 <= 3 Catchment Agriculture <= 36 <= 56 <= 59 <= 30 (non-row crop) (%) Catchment Agriculture <= 16 <= 22 <= 14.1 <= 15.7 (row crop) (%) Catchment Forest Cover >= 60 >= 41 >= 31 >= 56 (%) Riparian Developed (%) <= 2 <= 2 <= 2 -- A-1 Riparian Agriculture (%) <= 20 <= 40 <= 50 -- Riparian Forest Cover (%) >= 78 >= 41 >= 37.5 -- # Catchment Point Sources <= 4 <= 6 <= 10 <= 8 # Catchment Dams = 0 = 0 <= 1 <= 2 # Catchment Road <= 7 <= 19 <= 60 <= 330 Crossings Example Streams HW of W & E Branches Owego HW Tribs of W & E Branches Owego W & E Branches Owego Creek (NY); Fishing Creek, below Little Fishing Creek (NY); Tribs to Cross Creek Creek (NY); Scott Run (Cross Creek); Bradley Creek (NY); Upper Raccoon Creek (Bald Eagle Creek); Penns below confluence of North & Middle Big, Harpers & Whiskey Runs Creek; York Run (Georges Creek); Creek, btw Pine Creek and Big Poe Forks; Tribs to Brush Run (Raccoon (Blacklegs Creek); Perry Mill Run Georges Run (Monongahela R); Creek; lower Spruce Creek (Little Creek); some tribs to Blacklegs (Monongahela R); Gander Run Evitts Creek, above impoundment; Juniata River) Creek; small tribs to Monongahela & (Clear Creek); Rocky Gap Run Shobers Run; Little Juniata Creek; Cheat Rivers near their confluence; (Evitts Creek); Shobers Run; Hiett Bixler Run (Sherman Creek); Fort almost all tribs to Evitts creek Run (North R –WV); upper N. Branch Run (Aughwick Creek); Beaverdam draining ridge to east; tribs to Horn Little Aughwick Run; Beaverdam Run Run (Juniata R); Wickecheoke Creek Run (Standing Stone Creek); tribs to (Juniata R); Thomson Creek (NJ); Moores Run (Cacapon R - WV) Basher Kill, just above Neversink R (Conodoguinet Creek); Wickecheoke confluence (NY) Creek and Plum Brook (NJ) Crystalline Silicic Geology-Dominated Streams Size 1 Size 2 Size 3 Size 4 Reference Criterion (0-3 mi2 watershed area) (4-10 mi2 watershed area) (11-100 mi2 watershed area) (100+ mi2 watershed area) Catchment developed (%) 6 6 6 12 Catchment Agriculture 25 40 55 43 (non-row crop) (%) Catchment Agriculture 10 8 12.5 9 (row crop) (%) Catchment Forest Cover 59 55 37 35 (%) Riparian Developed (%) 5 4.9 6.9 -- Riparian Agriculture (%) 20 15 48.5 -- A-2 Riparian Forest Cover (%) 60 55 25 -- # Catchment Point Sources 4 6 16 35 # Catchment Dams 1 2 1 4 # Catchment Road 11 19 54 290 Crossings Example Streams HW of Rocky Mountain Creek & HW tribs to Yellow Breeches Creek; W. Br. Brandywine Creek; S. Br. Brandywine Creek; Musconetcong Carbaugh Run (Conococheague portions of Manatawny Creek; French Creek; W. Br. Perkiomen River (NJ) Creek); HW of Little Lehigh, Swabia & Sacony Creek and Beaver Run Creek Manatawny Creeks; Mountain Lake Brook (Pequest R) Crystalline Mafic Geology-Dominated Streams Size 1 Size 2 Size 3 Size 4 Reference Criterion (0-3 mi2 watershed area) (4-10 mi2 watershed area) (11-100 mi2 watershed area) (100+ mi2 watershed area) Catchment developed (%) 6 2.1 6 4.5 Catchment Agriculture 22 25 55 43 (non-row crop) (%) Catchment Agriculture 7 8.5 18 10 (row crop) (%) Catchment Forest Cover 68 67 29 36 (%) Riparian Developed (%) 3.5 3.5 4 -- Riparian Agriculture (%) 10 14.5 13 -- A-3 Riparian Forest Cover (%) 65 64 85 -- # Catchment Point Sources 3 4 10 13 # Catchment Dams 0 0 0 0 # Catchment Road 5 15 110 250 Crossings Example Streams Tribs to Tohickon Creek; Butter Creek Ridge Valley Creek (Unami Creek); Muddy, Otter & Fishing Creeks Brandywine Creek, below Buck Run (Unami Creek); Headwaters of Toms Dimple Creek (Tohickon Creek); (Susquehanna R); W. Br. confluence Creek Rapp & Beaver Creeks (Tinicum Brandywine Creek (near mouth) Creek) Appalachian Plateau Physiographic Province - Waynesburg Hills Section Size 1 Size 2 Size 3 Size 4 Reference Criterion (0-3 mi2 watershed area) (4-10 mi2 watershed area) (11-100 mi2 watershed area) (100+ mi2 watershed area) Catchment developed (%) <= 1 <= 3.7 <=0.9 <= 1.4 Catchment Agriculture <= 28 <= 37 <= 40 <= 41.5 (non-row crop) (%) Catchment Agriculture <= 3.5 <= 4 <= 0.55 <= 1 (row crop) (%) Catchment Forest Cover >= 70 >= 60 >= 59 >= 56 (%) Riparian Developed (%) <= 1.75 <= 3 <= 2 -- Riparian Agriculture (%) <= 18 <= 25 <= 36.5 -- Riparian Forest Cover (%) A-4 >= 80 >= 75 >= 61 -- # Catchment Point Sources <= 2 <= 2 <= 2 <= 21 # Catchment Dams <= 1 <= 1 <= 1 <= 9 # Catchment Road <= 6 <= 22 <= 53 <= 300 Crossings Example Streams Many tribs to Fish Creek PA Fork; Owens Run (Wheeling Creek, Enlow S. Fork Dunkard Fork; Wheeling S. Fork Tenmile Creek (btw Browns many Tribs to Wheeling Creek, both Fork); Wharton Run (Wheeling Creek, Dunkard Fork; Fish Creek, Creek & Grimes Run); Tenmile Robinson & Enlow forks, near PA Creek, Dunkard Fork); Crabapple PA fork (btw Knob and Pigeon Creek (btw Daniels Creek & Plum border); many tribs to Meadow Run; Creek; Bissett Run (Fish Creek, PA Runs); Dunkard Creek (btw Toms Run); Dunkard Creek (btw Miracle Woods Run (Whiteley Creek); tribs to Fork); Barneys Run (S. Fork Run & PA Fork Dunkard Creek); PA Run & Wrights Run) little Whiteley Creek (Monongahela R); Dunkard Run); Kent Run (Wheeling fork Dunkard Creek (below Clawson all tribs to Middle Run (Monongahela Creek, Dunkard Fork); Sharp Run Run); Roberts Run (btw Rush & R); Meadow & Bates Runs (Dunkard Creek) Sheppards Runs); mid Browns (Monongahela R) Creek; mid Bates Fork (Browns Run); Sections of Wheeling Creek, Robinson Fork; Wheeling Creek, Templeton Fork (btw Rocky Run & Wheeling Creek, Enlow Fork) Appalachian Plateau Physiographic Province – Northwest Glaciated Plateau Section Size 1 Size 2 Size 3 Size 4 Reference Criterion (0-3 mi2 watershed area) (4-10 mi2 watershed area) (11-100 mi2 watershed area) (100+ mi2 watershed area) Catchment developed (%) <= 1 <= 0.65 <= 1.5 <= 2.1 Catchment Agriculture <= 30 <= 37 <= 45 <= 35.5 (non-row crop) (%) Catchment Agriculture <= 14 <= 13.5 <= 19 <= 13 (row crop) (%) Catchment Forest Cover >= 70 >= 50 >= 43 >= 39 (%) Riparian Developed (%) <= 0.9 <= 1 <= 1.5 -- Riparian Agriculture (%) <= 29 <= 30 <= 34 -- A-5 Riparian Forest Cover (%) >= 70.5 >= 66 >= 60 -- # Catchment Point Sources <= 2 <= 3 <= 5 <= 15 # Catchment Dams <= 1 <= 2 <= 2 <= 4 # Catchment Road <= 6 <= 12 <= 44 <= 300 Crossings Example Streams Conneaut Creek & W. Br. Conneaut Middle/East Branches Conneaut West/Middle Branches Conneaut Sugar Creek (below Lake Creek HW tribs; McConnell Run & Tribs Creek; Inlet/Pine Runs (above Creek; Little Elk Creek; North Deer Confluence); lower NWGP section of (Sandy Creek); lower Mill Creek tribs Conneaut impoundment); HW and Mill Creeks (French Creek); Oil Creek; French Creek, above (French Creek); Woodcock Creek HW; Watson Run (Conneaut Outlet); middle Lake Creek; middle Little confluence with S. Br. French Creek; Sugar Creek HW tribs; lower small Little Sandy Creek tribs; W Br. Sugar Creek; Woodcock Creek Shenango R, btw Pymatuning & tribs to Oil Creek; HW Tribs so Spring Sugar Creek; Sugar Creek above impoundment; Muddy Creek Little Shenango confluence.; Creek (Brokenstraw Creek); some HW headwaters; Mackey/Temple Runs btw Potash Run & Federal Run; mid Conneaut Creek, below W. Br. tribs to Little Conneauttee Creek (Sandy Creek); many tribs to Oil Thompson Run; Spring Creek Conneaut confluence. Creek; Townly Run & Bailey Brook (Brokenstraw Creek); Little (W. Br. French Creek); Spencer Brokenstraw Creek; Shenango R Creek & Baskin Run (S. Br. French above Pymatuning Creek); North Br. Akeley & Storehouse Runs (Conewango Creek); Stony Creek (Little Brokenstraw Creek Piedmont Physiographic Province – All Sections Size 1 Size 2 Size 3 Size 4 Reference Criterion (0-3 mi2 watershed area) (4-10 mi2 watershed area) (11-100 mi2 watershed area) (100+ mi2 watershed area) Catchment developed (%) <= 6 <= 6 <= 5.5 <= 5.5 Catchment Agriculture <= 40 <= 45 <= 50 <= 40 (non-row crop) (%) Catchment Agriculture <= 17.5 <= 15 <= 17 <= 7 (row crop) (%) Catchment Forest Cover >= 50 >= 40 >= 32 >= 49 (%) Riparian Developed (%) <= 2.5 <= 3 <= 3 -- Riparian Agriculture (%) <= 25 <= 35 <= 45 -- A-6 Riparian Forest Cover (%) >= 55 >= 40 >= 22 -- # Catchment Point Sources <= 2 <= 2 <= 10 <= 40 # Catchment Dams = 0 <= 1 <= 2 <= 4 # Catchment Road <= 10 <= 20 <= 55 <= 815 Crossings Example Streams Sawmill Run; Furnace Run (Sawmill Beaver Creek; Tucquan Creek; lower Otter Creek; Middle Creek; Perkiomen Creek (Unami Creek Run); Counselman Run (Susquehanna upper Conewago Creek; upper upper Hammer Creek; mid Cocalico confluence to Skippack Creek R.); Oakland Run, Huber Run; Trout Chickens Cree/Shearers Creek; Creek; upper East Branch confluence); Tohickon Creek Run (Climbers Run); Shearers Creek Furnace & Segloch Runs of upper Brandywine Creek; S. Branch (Geddes Run to Del. R.) headwaters; headwater tribs of Middle Creek; upper Black Creek French Creek & French Creek above Hammer Creek, above impoundment; (Muddy Creek); N. Branch Indian S. Branch; W. Branch Perkiomen Tribs to Allegheny, Sixpenny & Seidel Run (E. Br. Brandywine Creek); Creek; Tinicum Creek Creeks (Schuylkill R); Tribs to Jehrico Rock, Beaver and Birch Runs Creek (French Creek); Deep Creek (Perkiomen Creek); Ridge Valley Creek (Unami, Perkiomen Creeks); Threemile Run & Haycock Creek (Tohickon Creek); Beaver and Rapp Creeks (Tinicum Creek); Jerhico Creek Ridge & Valley Physiographic Province – Susquehanna Lowland Section Size 1 Size
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chautauqua County
    CHAUTAUQUA Greenway Plan COUNTY April 2012 A four season destination for outdoor active living, nurtured by public/private partnerships. Prepared by Pashek Associates in cooperation with Chautauqua County Department of Planning & Economic Development “It is a wholesome and necessary thing for us to turn again to the earth and in the contemplation of her beauties to know of wonder and humility. - Rachel Carson” Photo Credit: Mark Geise All of the photographs in this document were taken at various locations throughout Chautauqua County. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A special thank you goes out to the citizens and organizations of Chautauqua County for their enthusiasm and input during this study. Also, the time commitment, wealth of knowledge, decision-making ability, and dedication of the following individuals made the Chautauqua County Greenway Plan possible. Chautauqua County Gregory J. Edwards ........................................................... County Executive Chautauqua County Department of Planning & Economic Development William Daly ...................................................................................... Director Mark Geise ........................................................................... Deputy Director Christine Kinn .........................................................................Senior Planner Don McCord ............................................................................Senior Planner Jeffrey Diers .............................................................Watershed Coordinator Debbie Liliestedt
    [Show full text]
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5
    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Darter Etheostoma Sellare
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Maryland darter Etheostoma Sellare Introduction The Maryland darter is a small freshwater fish only known from a limited area in Harford County, Maryland. These areas, Swan Creek, Gashey’s Run (a tributary of Swan Creek) and Deer Creek, are part of the larger Susquehanna River drainage basin. Originally discovered in Swan Creek nymphs. Spawning is assumed to species of darters. Electrotrawling is in 1912, the Maryland darter has not occur during late April, based on other the method of towing a net from a boat been seen here since and only small species, but no Maryland darters have with electrodes attached to the net that numbers of individuals have been been observed during reproduction. send small, harmless pulses through found in Gashey’s Run and Deer the water to stir up fish. Electrofishing Creek. A Rare Species efforts in the Susquehanna are Some biologists suspect that the continuing. Due to its scarcity, the Maryland Maryland darter could be hiding darter was federally listed as in the deep, murky waters of the A lack of adequate surveying of endangered in 1967, and critical Susquehanna River. Others worry large rivers in the past due to limited habitat was designated in 1984. The that the decreased darter population technology leaves hope for finding darter is also state listed. The last is evidence that the desirable habitat Maryland darters in this area. The new known sighting of the darter was in for these fish has diminished, possibly studies would likely provide definitive 1988. due to water quality degradation and information on the population status effects of residential development of the Maryland darter and a basis for Characteristics in the watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying the Distinct Rock Types in the Streambed of Muddy Run
    The JUNIATA JOURNAL of GEOLOGY, 1, 1-7 (2014) Original Article Identifying the Distinct Rock Types in the Streambed of Muddy Run Kristin N. Kopera Pennsylvania has many secondary and bedrock streams, and one such stream is Muddy Run. Muddy Run is located primarily in the Hamilton Formation, but also touches the Onondaga and Ridgeley Formations in Huntingdon County, Pennsylvania. This paper identifies the rock types that are currently in Muddy Run, and matches them to the local geologic formations. Instead of primarily finding Hamilton Group in the stream, the majority of the samples taken from Muddy Run were from the Tuscarora and Ridgeley Formations. This suggests that Muddy Run had, at one time, come in contact with the Tuscarora formation. This data could also suggest that Muddy Run once belonged to a larger stream that transported the Tuscarora sandstones and deposited them in Muddy Run’s current location. Keywords. — Bedrock Stream; Onondaga Formation; Ridgeley Formation; Meandering River; Tuscarora Formation Department of Geology, Juniata College, 1700 Moore Street, Huntingdon, PA 16652. Email: [email protected] INTRODUCTION Huntingdon County, Pennsylvania, is one such example. Bedrock streams, instead of just Rivers and streams are the main transporters of flowing over the ground, cut down into the local sediment and rock and they are known for their bedrock (Seidl & Dietrich 1993). This following powerful erosional capabilities. Sediment and paper will answer two questions concerning rock travel down gradient from location to Muddy Run. Firstly, throughout its geologic location until they come to rest in a delta history, from what locations has Muddy Run .Alternatively, the sediment could also be been eroding and transporting rock? In addition, deposited when the velocity of the water has where did the rocks in Muddy Run once belong become too slow to move the debris any farther.
    [Show full text]
  • Scranton Throop W 11 58 Jefferson
    MPMS# PROJECT: I-81 Detector System - Pittston to Clarks Summit 4 COUNTY: Lackawanna CATEGORY: ITS MUNICIPALITY: FUNCTIONAL CLASS: 11 S.R.: 0081 Segment: 1860 NHS: Yes DESCRIPTION: I-81 Pittston to Clarks Summit - Detector system at each interchange (2 detectors each direction = 4 X $30K each x 15 exits) PROJECT NEED: TRAFFIC FACILITY ENVIRONMENT COMMUNITY PROJECT PRIORITY Criteria 1: 3 AADT: 81716 Bridges Affected: 14 Wetland: Yes Comp Plan Zone: MDIA Criteria 2: 2 AATT: 15116 SD Bridge Present? N Streams: No Transit: Yes Criteria 3: 2 Truck %: 19 Min Sufficiency Rating: 51.8 Flood Plain: Yes EJ Pop: Yes Criteria 4: 2 2009 V/C: 0.93 Max Detour Length (miles): 99 Historic: Yes TUP Pop: Yes Criteria 5: 3 2030 V/C: 1.97 Min. IRI: 1 Section 4F: Yes Criteria 6: 2 524 TOTAL: 14 Crash DELTA: 0.59 Signals Affected: QR 0 Note: RANK: 54 ESTIMATED 2011-2014 2015-2016632 2017-2018 QR6322019-2022 2023-2030 TOTAL TIP QR DATES $0.00 $0.00 $3,800,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,800,000.00 Let: QR347 6 £11 ¤ 247QR 6 FUNDING SUMMARY ¤£ i Completion: r v e R 307 46 8006 aw na QR CLARKS N ck an SCOTT La ARCHBALD 307 SUMMIT O BLAKELY UV T D Y R A A H D L IELD 14 43 S Y NE RF 6 º L A A F G AV LOCATION ¤£ 34 R D O 62958 DICKSON 47 R T JESSUP ASSET MGMT E CITY S 57487 S N NEWTOND T I R ACRE A BRIDGE NEWT 200 M O L N 32 247 CMAQ B RD D 13 HILL 7912 L 80797 UV M M L R e E g CONNECTOR C O R g S k OLYPHANT U ert C ree H N A ENHANCEMENT URCH MILWA 8212 A HILL UK L D E M H R R ARS OO 247 SAFETY D E - 476 W QR R N R D TRANSIT O D ¨¦§ T SCRANTON THROOP W 11 58 JEFFERSON E £
    [Show full text]
  • Spotted Lanternfly Eradication Program in Select Counties of Pennsylvania
    Au United States Department of Agriculture Spotted Lanternfly Marketing and Regulatory Eradication Program in Programs Animal and Plant Health Select Counties of Inspection Service Pennsylvania Supplemental Environmental Assessment March 2018 Spotted Lanternfly Eradication Program in Select Counties of Pennsylvania Supplemental Environmental Assessment March 2018 Agency Contact: John Crowe National Policy Manager Plant Protection and Quarantine – Plant Health Programs Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 4700 River Road, Unit 134 Riverdale, MD 20737 Non-Discrimination Policy The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities.) To File an Employment Complaint If you wish to file an employment complaint, you must contact your agency's EEO Counselor (PDF) within 45 days of the date of the alleged discriminatory act, event, or in the case of a personnel action. Additional information can be found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_file.html. To File a Program Complaint If you wish to file a Civil Rights program complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form (PDF), found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html, or at any USDA office, or call (866) 632- 9992 to request the form.
    [Show full text]
  • Muncy Creek Township
    Muncy Creek Planning Area Plan Adoptions 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY Plan Adoptions HUGHESVILLE BOROUGH COUNCIL – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> MUNCY BOROUGH COUNCIL – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> PICTURE ROCKS BOROUGH COUNCIL – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> SHREWSBURY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> WOLF TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> Lycoming 2030: Plan the Possible 2 Muncy Creek Planning Area Acknowledgements 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY Acknowledgements Muncy Creek Planning Advisory Team (PAT) WALTER REED, REPRESENTATIVE OF HUGHESVILLE BOROUGH RICHARD SMITH, REPRESENTATIVE OF HUGHESVILLE BOROUGH STEVE JAQUITH, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY BOROUGH (ALTERNATE) BILL RAMSEY, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY BOROUGH LINDA STEIN, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY BOROUGH STEVEN CULVER, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIP BILL POULTON, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIP ANGELA SNYDER, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIP BILL DORMAN, REPRESENTATIVE OF PICTURE ROCKS BOROUGH EUGENE OTTERBEIN, REPRESENTATIVE OF PICTURE ROCKS BOROUGH DEAN BARTO, REPRESENTATIVE OF WOLF TOWNSHIP MELANIE MCCOY, REPRESENTATIVE OF WOLF TOWNSHIP TERRY DINCHER, REPRESENTATIVE OF SHREWSBURY TOWNSHIP REBECCA FOUGHT, REPRESENTATIVE OF EAST LYCOMING RECREATION AUTHORITY DAVID MACIEJEWSKI, REPRESENTATIVE OF EAST LYCOMING SCHOOL DISTRICT MICHAEL PAWLIK, REPRESENTATIVE OF EAST LYCOMING SCHOOL DISTRICT GENE CAHN, REPRESENTATIVE
    [Show full text]
  • NOTICES Men Creek—Swamp Creek) in Douglass Township, Mont- DELAWARE RIVER Gomery County and Colebrookdale Township, Berks BASIN COMMISSION County, PA
    2658 NOTICES men Creek—Swamp Creek) in Douglass Township, Mont- DELAWARE RIVER gomery County and Colebrookdale Township, Berks BASIN COMMISSION County, PA. 2. Roamingwood Sewer and Water Association, D-1988- Public Hearing and Business Meeting 014 CP-3. An application to renew the approval of the existing 1.755 mgd Roamingwood wastewater treatment The Delaware River Basin Commission (Commission) plant (WWTP) and its discharge. The WWTP will con- will hold a public hearing on Wednesday, May 16, 2018. A tinue to discharge treated effluent to Ariel Creek, up- business meeting will be held the following month on stream of Lake Wallenpaupack, at River Mile 277.7— Wednesday, June 13, 2018. The hearing and business 15.8—14.2—3.5 (Delaware River—Lackawaxen River— meeting are open to the public and will be held at the Wallenpaupack Creek—Ariel Creek), within the drainage West Trenton Volunteer Fire Company Ballroom, 40 West area of the section of the nontidal Delaware River known Upper Ferry Road, West Trenton, NJ. as the Upper Delaware, which the Commission has Public hearing. The public hearing on May 16, 2018, classified as Special Protection Waters, in Salem Town- will begin at 1:30 p.m. Hearing items subject to the ship, Wayne County, PA. Commission’s review will include draft dockets for with- 3. Northeast Land Company, D-1989-010 CP-4. An drawals, discharges and other water-related projects, as application to renew the approval of a groundwater well as resolutions to: (a) adopt the Commission’s annual withdrawal (GWD) project to continue to supply up to Current Expense and Capital Budgets for the Fiscal Year 4.81 million gallons per month (mgm) of water from ending June 30, 2019 (July 1, 2018, through June 30, existing Wells Nos.
    [Show full text]
  • Jjjn'iwi'li Jmliipii Ill ^ANGLER
    JJJn'IWi'li jMlIipii ill ^ANGLER/ Ran a Looks A Bulltrog SEPTEMBER 1936 7 OFFICIAL STATE September, 1936 PUBLICATION ^ANGLER Vol.5 No. 9 C'^IP-^ '" . : - ==«rs> PUBLISHED MONTHLY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA by the BOARD OF FISH COMMISSIONERS PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF FISH COMMISSIONERS HI Five cents a copy — 50 cents a year OLIVER M. DEIBLER Commissioner of Fisheries C. R. BULLER 1 1 f Chief Fish Culturist, Bellefonte ALEX P. SWEIGART, Editor 111 South Office Bldg., Harrisburg, Pa. MEMBERS OF BOARD OLIVER M. DEIBLER, Chairman Greensburg iii MILTON L. PEEK Devon NOTE CHARLES A. FRENCH Subscriptions to the PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER Elwood City should be addressed to the Editor. Submit fee either HARRY E. WEBER by check or money order payable to the Common­ Philipsburg wealth of Pennsylvania. Stamps not acceptable. SAMUEL J. TRUSCOTT Individuals sending cash do so at their own risk. Dalton DAN R. SCHNABEL 111 Johnstown EDGAR W. NICHOLSON PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER welcomes contribu­ Philadelphia tions and photos of catches from its readers. Pro­ KENNETH A. REID per credit will be given to contributors. Connellsville All contributors returned if accompanied by first H. R. STACKHOUSE class postage. Secretary to Board =*KT> IMPORTANT—The Editor should be notified immediately of change in subscriber's address Please give both old and new addresses Permission to reprint will be granted provided proper credit notice is given Vol. 5 No. 9 SEPTEMBER, 1936 *ANGLER7 WHAT IS BEING DONE ABOUT STREAM POLLUTION By GROVER C. LADNER Deputy Attorney General and President, Pennsylvania Federation of Sportsmen PORTSMEN need not be told that stream pollution is a long uphill fight.
    [Show full text]
  • Susquehanna Riyer Drainage Basin
    'M, General Hydrographic Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 109 Series -j Investigations, 13 .N, Water Power, 9 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR HYDROGRAPHY OF THE SUSQUEHANNA RIYER DRAINAGE BASIN BY JOHN C. HOYT AND ROBERT H. ANDERSON WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1 9 0 5 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transmittaL_.__.______.____.__..__.___._______.._.__..__..__... 7 Introduction......---..-.-..-.--.-.-----............_-........--._.----.- 9 Acknowledgments -..___.______.._.___.________________.____.___--_----.. 9 Description of drainage area......--..--..--.....-_....-....-....-....--.- 10 General features- -----_.____._.__..__._.___._..__-____.__-__---------- 10 Susquehanna River below West Branch ___...______-_--__.------_.--. 19 Susquehanna River above West Branch .............................. 21 West Branch ....................................................... 23 Navigation .--..........._-..........-....................-...---..-....- 24 Measurements of flow..................-.....-..-.---......-.-..---...... 25 Susquehanna River at Binghamton, N. Y_-..---...-.-...----.....-..- 25 Ghenango River at Binghamton, N. Y................................ 34 Susquehanna River at Wilkesbarre, Pa......_............-...----_--. 43 Susquehanna River at Danville, Pa..........._..................._... 56 West Branch at Williamsport, Pa .._.................--...--....- _ - - 67 West Branch at Allenwood, Pa.....-........-...-.._.---.---.-..-.-.. 84 Juniata River at Newport, Pa...-----......--....-...-....--..-..---.-
    [Show full text]
  • Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications
    Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Waterbody Type Segment ID Waterbody Index Number (WIN) Streams 0202-0047 Pa-63-30 Streams 0202-0048 Pa-63-33 Streams 0801-0419 Ont 19- 94- 1-P922- Streams 0201-0034 Pa-53-21 Streams 0801-0422 Ont 19- 98 Streams 0801-0423 Ont 19- 99 Streams 0801-0424 Ont 19-103 Streams 0801-0429 Ont 19-104- 3 Streams 0801-0442 Ont 19-105 thru 112 Streams 0801-0445 Ont 19-114 Streams 0801-0447 Ont 19-119 Streams 0801-0452 Ont 19-P1007- Streams 1001-0017 C- 86 Streams 1001-0018 C- 5 thru 13 Streams 1001-0019 C- 14 Streams 1001-0022 C- 57 thru 95 (selected) Streams 1001-0023 C- 73 Streams 1001-0024 C- 80 Streams 1001-0025 C- 86-3 Streams 1001-0026 C- 86-5 Page 1 of 464 09/28/2021 Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Name Description Clear Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Mud Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Tribs to Long Lake total length of all tribs to lake Little Valley Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Elkdale Kents Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Crystal Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Forestport Alder Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Bear Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Minor Tribs to Kayuta Lake total length of select tribs to the lake Little Black Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Wheelertown Twin Lakes Stream and tribs entire stream and tribs Tribs to North Lake total length of all tribs to lake Mill Brook and minor tribs entire stream and selected tribs Riley Brook
    [Show full text]
  • TUCQUAN CREEK and BEAR RUN SCENIC RIVERS ACT Act of Dec
    TUCQUAN CREEK AND BEAR RUN SCENIC RIVERS ACT Act of Dec. 19, 1988, P.L. 1286, No. 161 Cl. 32 AN ACT Designating Tucquan Creek in Lancaster County and Bear Run in Fayette County as components of the Pennsylvania Scenic Rivers System in accordance with the Pennsylvania Scenic Rivers Act; providing for cooperation by State agencies and local government; limiting liability; and authorizing the expenditure of moneys to further the purposes of the act. Compiler's Note: Section 307(b) of Act 18 of 1995, which created the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources and renamed the Department of Environmental Resources as the Department of Environmental Protection, provided that the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources shall exercise the powers and duties previously vested in the Department of Environmental Resources by Act 161 of 1988. The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows: Section 1. Short title. This act shall be known and may be cited as the Tucquan Creek and Bear Run Scenic Rivers Act. Section 2. Legislative findings and purpose. The Department of Environmental Resources has, in accordance with the act of December 5, 1972 (P.L.1277, No.283), known as the Pennsylvania Scenic Rivers Act, fulfilled its obligations and responsibilities prerequisite to the designation of Tucquan Creek and its Clark Run tributary and a portion of Bear Run and a segment of its major tributary, Beaver Run, as components of the Pennsylvania Scenic Rivers System. The designation of Tucquan Creek and its Clark Run tributary and a portion of Bear Run and a segment of its major tributary, Beaver Run, is for the purpose of recognizing their inherent qualities and protecting the scenic qualities and recreational values of these relatively undeveloped river corridors in accordance with the policy and provisions of the Pennsylvania Scenic Rivers Act.
    [Show full text]