Manningham City Council - Complementary Projects List Discipline Item
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
7.8 North East Link - Bulleen Park
Council Agenda 26/11/18 7.8 North East Link - Bulleen Park Abstract This report provides an update on the North East Link Authority (NELA) Bulleen Park land use planning project. It seeks Council support for an initial concept design for the Bulleen Park land use plan which incorporates the Boroondara Tennis Centre (BTC) and the 18-hole Freeway Golf Course (FGC). See Attachment 1 for an aerial image showing the project study area. NELA has initiated the study for the Bulleen Park area and has included the BTC and FGC in the project scope. Officers understand the aim of the project is to ensure no sporting club or facility is worse off as a result of the construction and operation of the North East Link (NEL). NELA has advised it intends to finalise the project by early 2019 for inclusion as an appendix in the NEL Environment Effects Statement (EES). NELA has conducted initial consultation about the project, with a workshop held at the Veneto Club on 8 August 2018. The workshop was attended by sporting clubs impacted by the NEL and Council representatives from Boroondara and Manningham. Officers understand NELA staff have also been meeting with sporting clubs and facility operators on an individual basis to discuss the project. Within a limited timeframe, Boroondara officers have prepared high-level concept plans for the FGC and BTC to be considered in the Bulleen Park land use planning study (Attachments 2 and 3). The plans respond to the impact of the NEL on several holes of the FGC by relocating the BTC to the same location and extending the FGC to land north of the current course edge located in Manningham. -
Submission Cover Sheets
Submission Cover Sheet North East Link Project EES IAC 402 Request to be heard?: No, but please email me th Full Name: Phil Turner Organisation: Maroondah City Council Affected property: Attachment 1: Maroondah_Coun Attachment 2: Maroondah_Coun Attachment 3: Comments: To the North East Link Inquiry & Advisory Committee (IAC) Maroondah Council provides the following submission to the IAC, in relation to the EES for the North East Link project. While Council formally supports the objectives of the NEL project, I advise that the support of Maroondah Council has been conditional on appropriate traffic considerations being made with regard to the impact of the project on the Eastlink tunnels, the Ringwood Bypass and by extension the Ringwood Metropolitan Activity Centre. Council previously commissioned a review by O’Brien Traffic that considered the project in the context of the tunnels and impacts on Ringwood, and it was determined that without ancillary works to take traffic pressure off the Eastlink tunnels and the Ringwood Bypass, the project would potentially fail and have a major detrimental impact on the viability of the Ringwood Metropolitan Activity Centre. The O’Brien Traffic report attached to this submission details the basis for those concerns. Council’s concerns were previously forwarded to NELA and Council officers have met with NELA officers on these matters, however, to date Council has not received an appropriate response that addresses these concerns, including within the ESS. In support of this submission, the following documents have also been uploaded: o A submission letter signed by Council’s Mayor Rob Steane documenting the history of Council’s dealings regarding NEL, and outlining Council’s concerns current with the project; o Council Report September 2018; o O’Brien Traffic Review dated 12 September 2017; o Council letter to NELA (26 February 2018) and NELA response (14 March 2018); o Correspondence from Council on Bypass concerns (including technical reports); and o Minutes from MCC / NELA meetings 6 April 2018 and 30 April 2018. -
2 0 1 9 / 2 0 a N N U a L R E P O
2019/20 ANNUAL REPORT Administration 1040 Whitehorse Road PO BOX 3083 Box Hill NUNAWADING 3128 VIC 3131 03 9896 4333 03 9896 4348 Where to find this report Copies of this report are available at the Corporation’s administration office. It can also be accessed electronically on the Corporation’s website at www.wml.vic.gov.au For further information, telephone 9896 4333. This publication is printed on 100% recycled paper. Acknowledgement of Country In the spirit of reconciliation, Whitehorse Manningham Libraries acknowledges the Wurundjeri people as the traditional custodians of the land. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present. CONTENTS 02 Introduction 03 Vision, Mission, Values 04 Our Community 05 Performance Highlights 09 Snapshot – Fast Figures 12 Chairperson’s Message 13 Chief Executive Officer’s Message 14 Board Members 17 The Year in Review 18 Financial Summary 20 Governance 26 Our Organisation 33 Our Performance 59 Financial Report 92 Glossary 94 Index 02 Annual Report 2019/20 INTRODUCTION Welcome to Whitehorse Manningham Regional Library Corporation’s (WMRLC) Annual Report 2019/20. This report details our performance for 2019/20 against the strategic themes outlined in our Library Plan 2017–2021 and our Annual Budget 2019/20. The report provides an overview of our key achievements and challenges throughout the past year. WMRLC services an area of 178km² located within Melbourne’s outer eastern suburbs. Manningham Cit Conil CB Warrandyte The Pines Bulleen oncaster Box Hill Cit of Nunawading Whitehorse Blackburn Vermont South Whitehorse Manningham Library 03 Our Vision A library open for all to discover a world of possibilities. -
7.5. Final Outcomes of 2020 General Valuation
Council Meeting Agenda 24/08/2020 7.5 Final outcomes of 2020 General Valuation Abstract This report provides detailed information in relation to the 2020 general valuation of all rateable property and recommends a Council resolution to receive the 1 January 2020 General Valuation in accordance with section 7AF of the Valuation of Land Act 1960. The overall movement in property valuations is as follows: Site Value Capital Improved Net Annual Value Value 2019 Valuations $82,606,592,900 $112,931,834,000 $5,713,810,200 2020 Valuations $86,992,773,300 $116,769,664,000 $5,904,236,100 Change $4,386,180,400 $3,837,830,000 $190,425,800 % Difference 5.31% 3.40% 3.33% The level of value date is 1 January 2020 and the new valuation came into effect from 1 July 2020 and is being used for apportioning rates for the 2020/21 financial year. The general valuation impacts the distribution of rating liability across the municipality. It does not provide Council with any additional revenue. The distribution of rates is affected each general valuation by the movement in the various property classes. The important point from an equity consideration is that all properties must be valued at a common date (i.e. 1 January 2020), so that all are affected by the same market. Large shifts in an individual property’s rate liability only occurs when there are large movements either in the value of a property category (e.g. residential, office, shops, industrial) or the value of certain locations, which are outside the general movements in value across all categories or locations. -
Appendix K Transport Assessment Project Case Report
Appendix K Transport Assessment Project case report February 2018 K Contents Executive summary.................................................................................................................................... K-6 Overview K-6 Key findings ..................................................................................................................................... K-6 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... K-8 1.1 Study area ........................................................................................................................ K-8 1.2 Structure of this report .................................................................................................. K-11 2 North East Link .............................................................................................................................. K-12 2.1 Project Overview............................................................................................................ K-12 2.2 New link between the M3 and M80 .............................................................................. K-14 2.3 Eastern Freeway and the Doncaster Busway ................................................................ K-17 2.4 M80 and Greensborough Bypass upgrade .................................................................... K-21 2.5 Walking and cycling ...................................................................................................... -
North East Link Melways Map April 2019
d Cal Donnybr der Fwy ook R d enty R Pl d m R E y p w p H eha i n a L g b a l R n e d c Mickl e M Ridd f i e l le d R d R d Pascoe Vale Rd Yan Yean Rd Plenty Rd Craigieburn R d d t-Coimadai R s Res Gisbourne-Mel Hume Hwy Digger Sydney Rd d ean R t Some Melbourne on R rton R d an Y Y A new traffic light free connection for the Ring Road, Airport d 1 EPPING Hume Fwy Greensborough Bypass, Greensborough Road Dalton Rd M80 Ring Road Ryans Rd Tul lamarine Fwy d Melbourne Airport enty R Metrpolitan Ring Rd Pl Maroondah Hwy and North East Link. Camp Rd Melton Hwy Cal Camp Rd der Fwy S BUNDOORA ELTHAM y W oad dne es SYDENHAM t ern Fwy y R GLENROY d RESERVOIR tern Ring R Greensborough Road rebuilt on both sides of North East pass Essendon 2 1 es Airport gh By W ou W Murr bor ay Rd oad Bell St High St Greens Link for local, toll-free trips. R attle Main Rd d CityLink Settlement Rd k d ROSANNA e R ST ALBANS Buckl Mahoneys Rd ey St d e R r ation R St ges t T d S ena r Brunswick R St Geor ee d Through traffic on North East Link and Greensborough n mond C 3 o ia Hopkins R SUNSHINE t Hel R DONCASTER s D Eastern Fwy p St d BALWYN Eastern Fwy Road under Grimshaw Street to keep traffic flowing and 2 m e RINGWOOD FOOTSCRAY oondah Hwy Bal KEW K Mar lan R BOX HILL d St Helena Rd CBD y Rd RICHMOND erbur cut congestion in all directions. -
Whitehorse City Council Annual
CITY OF WHITEHORSE Annual Report 2016/2017 1 Welcome to Whitehorse City Council’s Annual Report for 2016‐17. The Annual Report provides a thorough account of Council’s achievements, challenges and performance from 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2017. It also provides audited financial statements and the performance statement. If you would like a printed copy or wish to provide feedback, please contact Council on 9262 6333 or email [email protected] In the spirit of reconciliation, Whitehorse City Council acknowledges the Wurundjeri people as the traditional custodians of the land. We pay our respects to Elders past and present. Annual Report 2016‐ 17 2 Contents Mayor’s Message 7 CEO’s Message 9 Highlights of 2016‐17 11 Challenges and Opportunities of 2016‐17 14 Fast Facts about Whitehorse City Council’s Services 15 Our Vision 16 Our Mission 16 Our Values 16 Financial Year in Review 17 Financial Overview 17 Adjusted Underlying Result 17 Operating Result 18 Operating Income 18 Operating Expenditure 19 Overall Financial Position 19 Liquidity 19 Obligations 20 Stability and Efficiency 21 Capital Works Program 21 Asset Management 23 Strategic Asset Management Achievements 2016‐17 23 Financial Outlook 24 Financial Sustainability 24 Supporting Graphs 24 Our Council 26 Our City, Our People 26 Facts about Whitehorse 26 Our Councillors 27 Our People, Our Organisation 29 Our Organisation 30 Organisational Structure 30 Council’s People and Organisation Performance 31 Workforce Planning and Professional Development 33 Equal Opportunity -
Gymnastics Victoria Facility Guide & Strategy Plan
GYMNASTICS VICTORIA FACILITY GUIDE & STRATEGY PLAN Prepared for Gymnastics Victoria by Brian Mott This page is left blank intentionally. 1 CONTENTS 1 PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 2 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 MARKET RESEARCH AND CONSULTATION ............................................................................................ 6 2.2.1 Survey ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 2.2.2 Further Consultation ................................................................................................................................ 6 2.2.3 Market Research ..................................................................................................................................... 6 3 STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENT............................................................................................................................. 7 4 KEY FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................................. 8 4.1.1 Gymnastics -
BULLETIN7 NOVEMBER 2004 Environmental Indicators for Metropolitan Melbourne What’S Inside • Air Emissions
BULLETIN7 NOVEMBER 2004 Environmental Indicators For Metropolitan Melbourne What’s Inside • Air Emissions • Water • Beach and Bay • Greenhouse • Open Space • Waste AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF URBAN STUDIES & CITY OF MELBOURNE METROPOLITAN MELBOURNE PROFILE source: Department of Infrastructure 1998. Metropolitan Melbourne covers 8,833 square kilometres. There are 31 Local Governments (municipalities) within the metropolitan Melbourne region. Region Local Government Area Area (square kilometres) Estimated Residential Population density Population, June 2003 (population per km2) Central Melbourne 36.1 58 031 1 607.5 Port Phillip 20.7 82 331 3 977.3 Yarra 19.5 69 536 3 565.9 Total 76.3 209 898 2 751 Inner Boroondara 60.2 157 888 2 622.7 Darebin 53.5 127 321 2 379.8 Glen Eira 38.7 122 770 3 172.4 Maribyrnong 31.2 61 863 1 982.8 Moonee Valley 44.3 109 567 2 473.3 Moreland 50.9 135 762 2 667.2 Stonnington 25.6 90 197 3 523.3 Total 304.4 805 368 2 645.8 Middle Banyule 62.6 118 149 1 887.4 Bayside 37 89 330 2 414.3 Brimbank 123.4 172 995 1 401.9 Greater Dandenong 129.7 127 380 982.1 Hobsons Bay 64.4 83 585 1 297.9 Kingston 91.1 135 997 1 492.8 Knox 113.9 150 157 1 318.3 Manningham 113.3 114 198 1 007.9 Monash 61.4 161 841 2 635.8 Maroondah 81.5 100 801 1 236.8 Whitehorse 64.3 145 455 2 262.1 Total 942.6 1 399 888 1 485.1 Outer Cardinia 1,281.6 51 290 40 Casey 409.9 201 913492.6 Frankston 129.6 117 079 903.4 Hume 503.8 144 314286.5 Melton 527.6 65 507124.2 Mornington Peninsula 723.6 137 467 190 Nillumbik 430.4 60 585 140.8 Whittlesea 489.4 123 397252.1 -
Various Planning Scheme Amendments 8 Dec 2020
Form 1 Section 38(1) NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO A PLANNING SCHEME TO BE PRESENTED TO PARLIAMENT On 24 November 2020 the Minister approved Amendment No. C222ball to the Ballarat Planning Scheme. The amendment was prepared by Ballarat City Council. The Ballarat City Council will be responsible for administering the scheme. The Amendment applies a Heritage Overlay (HO225) to parts of the former Ballarat Saleyards, 1020 La Trobe Street, Delacombe and makes other consequential changes to the Ballarat Planning Scheme. The Minister did not exempt the planning authority from any of the requirements of sections 17, 18 or 19 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987. The Minister did not exempt the planning authority from any of the requirements of the Planning and Environment Regulations 2015. The Minister did not prepare the amendment under section 20A of the Planning and Environment Act 1987. Stuart Menzies Director, State Planning Services Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning For the Minister Date: 07 December 2020 Planning and Environment Regulations 2015 Form 1 Section 38(1) OFFICIAL Form 1 Section 38(1) NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO A PLANNING SCHEME TO BE PRESENTED TO PARLIAMENT On 16 November 2020 the Minister approved Amendment No. C97cola to the Colac Otway Planning Scheme. The amendment was prepared by the Colac Otway Shire Council. The Colac Otway Shire Council will be responsible for administering the scheme. The changes to the scheme are: implementation of the strategic land use directions of the Colac 2050 Growth Plan (2019) by updating the Municipal Planning Strategy, relevant clauses in the Planning Policy Framework, and the schedules to the Operational Provisions 72.08 Background Documents and 74.02 Further Strategic Work. -
EXPERT REVIEW DRAFT IPCC SREX Chapter 9 Do Not Cite, Quote, Or
EXPERT REVIEW DRAFT IPCC SREX Chapter 9 1 Chapter 9. Case Studies 2 3 Coordinating Lead Authors 4 Gordon McBean (Canada), Virginia Murray (UK), Mihir Bhatt (India) 5 6 Lead Authors 7 Sergey Borshch (Russian Federation), Tae Sung Cheong (South Korea), Wadid Fawzy Erian (Egypt), Silvia Llosa 8 (Peru), Farrokh Nadim (Norway), Arona Ngari (Cook Islands), Mario Nunez (Argentina), Ravsal Oyun (Mongolia), 9 Avelino G. Suarez (Cuba) 10 11 Note: Also see authors and contributing authors for each case study. 12 13 14 Contents 15 16 9.1. Introduction 17 9.1.1. Description of Case Studies Approach in General 18 9.1.2. Case Study Analyses: Lessons Identified and Learned – Good and Bad Practices 19 20 9.2. Methodological Approach 21 9.2.1. Case Studies 22 9.2.2. Literature: Papers, Reports, Grey Literature 23 9.2.3. Relationship between Extreme Climate-Related Events and Climate Change 24 9.2.4. Scale 25 26 9.3. Case Studies 27 9.3.1. Extreme Events 28 – Case Study 9.1. Tropical Cyclones 29 – Case Study 9.2. Urban Heat Waves, Vulnerability and Resilience 30 – Case Study 9.3. Drought and Famine in Ethiopia in the Years 1999-2000 31 – Case Study 9.4. Sand and Dust Storms 32 – Case Study 9.5. Floods 33 – Case Study 9.6. Drought, Heat Wave, and Black Saturday Bushfires in Victoria 34 – Case Study 9.7. Dzud of 2009-2010 in Mongolia 35 – Case Study 9.8. Disastrous Epidemic Disease: The Case of Cholera 36 9.3.2. Vulnerable Regions and Populations 37 – Case Study 9.9. -
Sites of (Biological) Significance Review
MANNINGHAM BIOSITES MANNINGHAM CITY COUNCIL SITES OF (BIOLOGICAL) SIGNIFICANCE REVIEW Report by Paul Foreman Economic and Environmental Planning Unit, Manningham City Council With chapters on Bryophytes by David Meagher of Zymurgy Consultants and Invertebrates by Alan Yen and John Wainer of the Department of Primary Industries November 2004 Front Cover: Fringed Helmet Orchid (Corysanthes fimbriata). “an uncommon species of sparadic distribution in Victoria” (Backhouse and Jeans 1995). Listed as rare on the Victorian Rare or Threatened species list. Recorded from one Manningham biosite. Image supplied by Justin Welander Table of Contents PREFACE .....................................................................................................................1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..........................................................................................................2 ABBREVIATIONS .....................................................................................................................3 SUMMARY .....................................................................................................................4 1 BACKGROUND ...............................................................................................................6 1.1 Introduction...................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Study aim......................................................................................................................... 6 1.3