Larrikinism in Corrigan's Architectural Theatre Wouter Van Acker

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Larrikinism in Corrigan's Architectural Theatre Wouter Van Acker Larrikinism in Corrigan’s Architectural Theatre Wouter Van Acker, Université Libre de Bruxelles * Reviewing “Architecture in the Antipodes” in 1984, RIBA journal editor Peter Murray, put Peter Corrigan in a van of Australian architects searching for an architecture that was positively, proudly and distinctively Australian. Besides through his completion of a postgraduate programme at Yale under Charles Moore, and his work experience in the offices of Paul Rudolph, Victor Gruen Associates, and Philip Johnson, Corrigan played a crucial role as an attractor and translator of a postmodernist model of regionalism in Melbourne and Australia in the latter half of the 1970s and well into the 1990s, through various media: journals in which he published or that he co-founded like Smudges, discussion groups like Half-Time, conferences such as the “Pleasures of Architecture”(1980) conference, and most importantly university lectures and his legendary studio training at RMIT. While the current literature on Corrigan points especially to his familiarity with the ideas of Venturi and Scott-Brown as the main source for the way in which he a celebrates the unique ordinariness of suburbia in his architecture, his long-standing engagement with stage design since his student years seems to have been even more important. Australian identity was also one of the main themes that The New Wave theatre explored, in particular the Australian Performing Group (APG) in which Corrigan was deeply involved intellectually. Following Caspar Neher, he adopted as a stage designer the Brechtian technique of unveiling the constructed nature of the theatrical stage, which rhymed well with the self-parodic stereotyping of larrikinism through performance and gesture in the APG plays. Transferring carnivalesque, grotesque and burlesque design experiments from theatre to the field of architecture, Corrigan forged a unique brand of regionalism that challenged the dualistic centre-periphery model accepted by modernists such as Robin Boyd who assessed Australian suburbia as inhabited by a public that “knows no better, has seen no better design.” Corrigan’s anti-authoritarianism led him to a subversive postmodernist stance that found in the suburban ‘periphery’ the material to find a way out of the casting of Australian architecture as peripheral. EAHN Dublin 2016 302 PAPER Introduction In the late 1970s and early 1980s a group of Australian architects celebrated a regionalism that was more pluralistic than the regionalism pursued by the generation of modernists before them. 17 The renewed interest in the concept of regionalism was, besides a response to the so-called ‘cultural cringe’ and Australia’s stigma of cultural isolation and derivation. In the 1960s, art historian Bernard Smith found that Australians, before they would dare to call Europe equally the antipodes of Australia, they had to overcome their embarrassment over the suggestion that they “stood on their heads at the bottom of the world.”18 But the new embrace of Australianness was also a consequence of the appropriation of the postmodernist movement in Australia. According to Melbourne architect Daryl Jackson, postmodernism had ‘freed things up’ and allowed for a distinctive mode of hybridisation for the Australian architect who no longer had ‘to look over its shoulder to see what is happening elsewhere.’19 The National Times reported in 1981 about Australian ‘new wave architects,’ most of them in their mid 30s, advocating a new postmodern style that will be ‘more interesting to the public because it is easier to understand.’20 In analogy with new wave music it incorporated a pop feel while keeping the experimental and wayward ethos of punk. Besides architects such as Greg Burgess, Peter Crone, and Norman Day, it was Peter Corrigan, leading an architectural firm with his wife Maggie Edmond since 1972, who played a pivotal role in giving direction to postmodern regionalism in Australia. The regionalism of Edmond and Corrigan explores the iconography of the suburban world Australia has built on its own; a regionalism that is very different from the evocation of a mythical harmony of nature, dwelling and building in the work of Glen Murcutt and others. Yet, just as the architecture that Kenneth Frampton labelled as ‘critical regionalism’ can be critiqued for falling back all too easily into the 17 On the ‘antipodean’ regionalism of the Australian modernists in the 1960s, see: Doug Evans, ‘Centre and Periphery: Melbourne Regionalism and its Global Context in the 1950’s and 1960’s’, Universal versus Individual, Conference Jyväskylä, Finland, 2002, http://www.alvaraalto.fi/conferences/universal/finalpapers/doug.evans.rtf (last accessed 9 February 2016). 18 P. Beilharz, Imagining the antipodes: culture, theory, and the visual in the work of Bernard Smith, Cambridge/New York, Cambridge University Press, 1997; p. 122. 19 P. Murray, ‘Architecture in the Antipodes’, RIBA Journal, vol. 91, no. 2, February 1984, p. 21-28, 23. 20 J. Sandeman, ‘New wave architects show their wares’, The National Times, 30 August to September 5, 1981, p. 56. EAHN Dublin 2016 303 domain of world culture, one can wonder if Corrigan’s regionalism does not suffer the same fate in following the international project of postmodernism.21 Although Corrigan’s architectural approach seeks to distinguish itself in its Australianness, it is also greatly influenced by the appropriation of ideas that were part of the international discourse on postmodernism. Corrigan studied and worked for seven years in the United States after his studies at Melbourne University. His completion of a postgraduate programme at Yale under Charles Moore, and his work experience in the offices of among others Paul Rudolph, Victor Gruen Associates, and Philip Johnson, functioned as a sort of accelerator for the development of his postmodernist approach of which he had sowed the seeds already before his departure and, after his return back home, enabled him to play a privileged role as a translator and propagator of postmodernism in Melbourne and Australia in the latter half of the 1970s and well into the 1990s. It is not surprising therefore that current literature on Corrigan points to his familiarity with the ideas of Robert Venturi and Denise Scott-Brown who ran the Learning from Las Vegas studio when he studied at Yale as the most important source for his strategic sampling of ordinary architectural features of Australian suburbia. The current literature on Corrigan tends to neglect the personal assimilation within his architecture of ideas derived from his long-standing engagement with stage design since his student years and in his later work for directors Lindzee Smith in the 70s, Peter King and Graeme Blundell in the 80s, Barrie Kosky in the 90s and Michael Kantor in the late 2000s.22 In several places, Corrigan states that his architectural practice has always had the ambition to create ‘poor architecture’ as in ‘poor theatre’, a concept launched by the Polish theatre director Jerzy Grotowski in 1965, promoting a return to ‘the personal and scenic technique of the actor as the core of theatre art’ in response to ‘rich theatre’ using new media techiques.23 Corrigan translates the idea of ‘poor theatre’ into architecture as ‘an attempt to make public statements within tight budgets.’24 One of the most important statements that his architecture makes is one about Australian identity. It is in this interdisciplinary exchange, which also crosses many geographical borders that this paper seeks to account for the larrikinism that characterizes his regionalist model of postmodernism. 21 P. Walker, ‘Kenneth Frampton and the Fiction of Place,’ in: A. Leach, A. Moulis, and N. Sully (eds.), Shifting Views: Selected Essays on the Architectural History of Australia and New Zealand, St Lucia: University of Queensland Press, 2008, pp. 70-80. 22 An exception to this is Michael Anderson who has published about Corrigan’s trajectory in theatre, notably: C. Hamann, Cities of hope remembered/rehearsed: Australian architecture & stage design by Edmond & Corrigan 1962- 2012, Fishermans Bend, Vic, Thames & Hudson Australia, 2012, pp. 149-158. 23 J. Grotowski, ‘Towards a Poor Theatre’ [1965] in: E. Barba (ed.), Jerzy Grotowski. Towards a Poor Theatre, New York, Routledge, 2002, pp. 15-27, 15. 24 Peter Corrigan, statement as foreword to R. Munday ‘Passion in the suburbs’, Architecture Australia, vol. 66, no. 1, February/March 1977, p. 52. EAHN Dublin 2016 304 Anti-naturalism Corrigan recounts that while hanging round LaMama during his residency in New York he was most fascinated by John Vaccaro and the Theatre of the Ridiculous. One moment that he will never forget is when at a rehearsal John Vaccaro asked an actor to stop ‘this acting shit:’ That struck me as significant. Acting was about technique. It was primarily English mainstream. What he was proposing was a radical model of performance – to bring your own life experience on stage rather than simulate life experience.25 In analogy with theatre, Corrigan says he could not help to think ‘Stop this design shit’ when seeing much of the architecture produced in his time. ‘I really lost as a very young man the patience with the whole methodology of architectural design. And this happened in theatre,’ he remembers.26 After returning from New York to Melbourne in 1973, Corrigan immediately joined the Australian Performing Group (APG) as a stage designer. He recalls how ‘slightly smutty’ and funny the first show was that he saw after his
Recommended publications
  • An Antipodean Imaginary for Architecture+Philosophy
    69 An Antipodean Imaginary for Architecture+Philosophy: Fictocritical Approaches to Design Practice Research Hélène Frichot, Julieanna Preston, Michael Spooner, Sean Pickersgill, Zuzana Kovar, Ceri Hann, Megg Evans As a collective of PhD researchers (past and fictocriticism will be ventured and reframed for archi- present) provisionally gathered within the tecture. This approach will be elaborated by Hélène Architecture+Philosophy Research Group, RMIT Frichot who has had the opportunity to offer super- University, we will present a series of design visorial guidance to researchers presenting their explorations that are representative of our design design research below. Fictocriticism for architec- practice research.1 With the conjunctive capacity ture assumes the constructive, creative and critical of architecture and philosophy we emphasize the situatedness of the thinking-designer in the midst ongoing importance of the relay between these of their problematic field.2 We place an emphasis disciplines, also activated in our work through the on critical and creative invention and the structured productive relations between critical theory and indeterminacy that manifests in the wild association practice. We assume an expanded definition of of images and ideas that procure innovative as well architectural design practice, which includes digital as politically engaged minoritarian architectures. immersive environments, unbuilt (even unbuildable) There endures an engagement with minorities, and architectures, installation and participatory perform- minor literatures (including sub-canonical architec- ance-based works, and also, importantly, includes tures), feminist approaches, queer intertextualities, the critical and creative practice of writing-architec- as well as teratological mixtures of the natural and ture, often through the deployment of fiction. These the cultural.
    [Show full text]
  • Building 8, RMIT University
    Nationally Significant 20th-Century Architecture Revised 9/01/2012 Building 8, RMIT University Address 368 Swanston Street, Melbourne 3000 Practice Edmond and Corrigan in assoc. with Demaine Designed 1990 Completed 1993 Address History & Sitting on top of John Andrew’s incomplete four storeyed Union Description building, Edmond & Corrigan’s additions to Building 8 make a 368 riotously colourful signpost for RMIT along Swanston Street. ‘Built on a tight budget and with the constraints of the the existing buildings beside and below, Building 8 is like a magic castle. A new Swanston Street lift and service core were built and account for the medieval passage accessing the upper floors. The deep floor plate was Melbourne maximised, resulting in a rabbit warren of rooms to the upper floors. Balustrade details, handrails and dadoes are built to last and the 3000 entire interior has the chaotic vibrancy of a pre-Renaisance city. From various points along Swanston Street , the expressionistic roofscape reveals more and more formal fantasy from the crystalline cornice and Darth Vader exhaust hoods over the fire escape stairs, to the corrugated Matterhorn of the lift overrun. The coloured stone facade and its knitting needle, steel pipe strut supports continue the bastion theme, whilst on the back elevation, a polychrome and polygonal brick fire stair turret acknowledges Percy Everett’s 1930s workshops and provides the visual focus for one of RMIT’s few outdoor spaces.’ (extracts from Philip Goad, Melbourne Architecture, p223) RAIA Nº Corrigan’s aim was to delight and break down the dominant and The medieval access corridor seamless city-wall 'mood' RMIT presented on Swanston Street.
    [Show full text]
  • School of Architecture 2016–2017 School of Architecture School Of
    BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY BULLETIN OF YALE BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Periodicals postage paid New Haven ct 06520-8227 New Haven, Connecticut School of Architecture 2016–2017 School of Architecture 2016 –2017 BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Series 112 Number 4 June 30, 2016 BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Series 112 Number 4 June 30, 2016 (USPS 078-500) The University is committed to basing judgments concerning the admission, education, is published seventeen times a year (one time in May and October; three times in June and employment of individuals upon their qualifications and abilities and a∞rmatively and September; four times in July; five times in August) by Yale University, 2 Whitney seeks to attract to its faculty, sta≠, and student body qualified persons of diverse back- Avenue, New Haven CT 0651o. Periodicals postage paid at New Haven, Connecticut. grounds. In accordance with this policy and as delineated by federal and Connecticut law, Yale does not discriminate in admissions, educational programs, or employment against Postmaster: Send address changes to Bulletin of Yale University, any individual on account of that individual’s sex, race, color, religion, age, disability, PO Box 208227, New Haven CT 06520-8227 status as a protected veteran, or national or ethnic origin; nor does Yale discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity or expression. Managing Editor: Kimberly M. Go≠-Crews University policy is committed to a∞rmative action under law in employment of Editor: Lesley K. Baier women, minority group members, individuals with disabilities, and protected veterans. PO Box 208230, New Haven CT 06520-8230 Inquiries concerning these policies may be referred to Valarie Stanley, Director of the O∞ce for Equal Opportunity Programs, 221 Whitney Avenue, 3rd Floor, 203.432.0849.
    [Show full text]
  • School of Architecture 2012–2013
    BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY BULLETIN OF YALE BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Periodicals postage paid New Haven ct 06520-8227 New Haven, Connecticut School of Architecture 2012–2013 School of Architecture 2012–2013 BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Series 108 Number 4 June 30, 2012 BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Series 108 Number 4 June 30, 2012 (USPS 078-500) The University is committed to basing judgments concerning the admission, education, is published seventeen times a year (one time in May and October; three times in June and employment of individuals upon their qualifications and abilities and a∞rmatively and September; four times in July; five times in August) by Yale University, 2 Whitney seeks to attract to its faculty, sta≠, and student body qualified persons of diverse back- Avenue, New Haven CT 0651o. Periodicals postage paid at New Haven, Connecticut. grounds. In accordance with this policy and as delineated by federal and Connecticut law, Yale does not discriminate in admissions, educational programs, or employment against Postmaster: Send address changes to Bulletin of Yale University, any individual on account of that individual’s sex, race, color, religion, age, disability, or PO Box 208227, New Haven CT 06520-8227 national or ethnic origin; nor does Yale discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity or expression. Managing Editor: Linda Koch Lorimer University policy is committed to a∞rmative action under law in employment of Editor: Lesley K. Baier women, minority group members, individuals with disabilities, and covered veterans. PO Box 208230, New Haven CT 06520-8230 Inquiries concerning these policies may be referred to the Director of the O∞ce for Equal Opportunity Programs, 221 Whitney Avenue, 203.432.0849 (voice), 203.432.9388 The closing date for material in this bulletin was June 1, 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the 7Th International Conference of the Association Of
    DE-- DEDE-- SIGN-- SIGNSIGN---- ING // INGING //// EDU-- EDUEDU---- CA-- CACA-- TION TIONTION 7th International Conference of the Association of Architecture Schools of Australasia REGISTRATION Academics: $300 7th7th InternationalInternational ConferenceConference ofof thethe AssociationAssociation ofof ArchitectureArchitecture SchoolsSchools ofof AustralasiaAustralasia REGISTRATIONREGISTRATION 3-5 October 2013 | Monash University, RMIT University, the University of MelbourneAcademics:Academics: $300 $300 Sessionals/Professionals: $200 3-53-5 October October 2013 2013 | | Monash Monash University, University, RMIT RMIT University, University, the the University University of of Melbourne Melbourne Sessionals/Professionals:Sessionals/Professionals: $200 $200 Students: $40 “While the architectural field has changed more in the last 30 years than in the previous 3,000 thanksStudents:Students: to the $40 $40 rapid accelera- “While“While the the architectural architecturaltion field field of globalization hashas changedchanged moreandmore in inthe thethe convulsionslast last 3030 yearsyears than thanof the in in the themarket previousprevious economy 3,0003,000 thanksthanks architectural toto thethe rapidrapid education acceleraaccelera-- has mostly failed to keep pace.” Available at : http://aireys.its. tiontion ofof globalizationglobalization- andandAMO thethe convulsionsconvulsions ofof thethe marketmarket economyeconomy architecturalarchitectural educationeducation hashas mostlymostly failedfailed toto keepkeep pace.”pace.” AvailableAvailable
    [Show full text]
  • Mr Peter Russell Corrigan AM
    Peter Russell Corrigan AM Citation for Doctor of Architecture honoris causa Peter Russell Corrigan AM is an internationally renowned architect, theatre designer and academic. Throughout his career, he has exerted considerable influence on architectural practice and education in Australia and has been widely recognised for his work, being described as “the engine of postmodern architectural change in Australian architecture” in a 2005 issue of Fabrications, the Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand (SAHANZ). Corrigan’s architectural career began at the University of Melbourne where he completed a Bachelor of Architecture in 1966. During his studies he was heavily involved in student theatre and this engendered a longstanding interest in theatre set design. In 1963, he spent time touring South-east Asia and Japan to expand his knowledge of theatre and architecture. From Melbourne, Corrigan went on to study in the United States, graduating with a Master of Environmental Design from Yale University in 1969. In the US, Corrigan worked for influential design architects including Paul Rudolph, Ulrich Franzen, Cesar Pelli and Kevin Roche, and his time at Yale enabled him to have greater contact with the vibrant United States theatre scene, leading to engagement with Antonin Artaud’s theatre of the absurd, Bertolt Brecht’s street-theatre ideas, and Jerzy Grotowski’s theatre of the poor. He also had increasing contact with several leading theatre and visual arts figures in Australia, notably Patrick McCaughey, Jack Hibberd and Graeme Blundell, and it was through these relationships that he was enticed back to Australia in 1974, designing a controversial set for Don Giovanni at the Sydney Opera House.
    [Show full text]
  • School of Architecture 2011–2012
    BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Periodicals postage paid New Haven ct 06520-8227 New Haven, Connecticut School of Architecture 2011–2012 School of Architecture 2011–2012 BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Series 107 Number 4 June 30, 2011 BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Series 107 Number 4 June 30, 2011 (USPS 078-500) The University is committed to basing judgments concerning the admission, education, is published seventeen times a year (one time in May and October; three times in June and employment of individuals upon their qualifications and abilities and a∞rmatively and September; four times in July; five times in August) by Yale University, 2 Whitney seeks to attract to its faculty, sta≠, and student body qualified persons of diverse back- Avenue, New Haven CT 0651o. Periodicals postage paid at New Haven, Connecticut. grounds. In accordance with this policy and as delineated by federal and Connecticut law, Yale does not discriminate in admissions, educational programs, or employment against Postmaster: Send address changes to Bulletin of Yale University, any individual on account of that individual’s sex, race, color, religion, age, disability, or PO Box 208227, New Haven CT 06520-8227 national or ethnic origin; nor does Yale discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity or expression. Managing Editor: Linda Koch Lorimer University policy is committed to a∞rmative action under law in employment of Editor: Lesley K. Baier women, minority group members, individuals with disabilities, and covered veterans. PO Box 208230, New Haven CT 06520-8230 Inquiries concerning these policies may be referred to the O∞ce for Equal Opportu- nity Programs, 221 Whitney Avenue, 203.432.0849 (voice), 203.432.9388 (TTY).
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation Summaries
    MAURO BARACCO LEONA DUSANOVIC a special interest in developing architectural Emma Jackson is a senior lecturer at RMIT Univer- THOMAS MURATORE regards to the myriad apocryphal tales which have typologies into project specific responses. sity in the School of Architecture and Urban Design surrounded the Corrigan studio for years. The act Theoretical positions shared in the past with Peter Attending various performances was compulsory and the Program Manager of the Master of Urban A legacy contributes to our understanding of of discussing the studio, amongst past students, Corrigan through collaborative academic activities in Peter Corrigan’s studio. I distinctly recall him Catherine Ranger is an associate director of MGS Design and is currently undertaking a PhD at RMIT community and place. In many ways legacies is ubiquitous, for until observed any of the myths engage with the notions of critical resistance and noting during a class that ‘Lucy Guerin is a genius’. Architects whose keen eye for detail sees her University. act as an index alongside and against which we about Schrödinger’s Professor are both true and marginality. This presentation will discuss the Lucy Guerin is a choreographer, I didn’t know responsible for continuing to shape the practice’s develop our own values, but by definition have false. significance of these empathetic positions as much about her work at the time. What Corrigan’s design vision and creative ambition. Catherine’s IAN MCDOUGALL the author’s imprint left upon them. In this way, seminal to forms of proximity and analogy design studios permitted was a personal way to approach to design is one that explores the a legacy is not a passive heirloom but an active Laura Szyman is currently completing her Master between intellectual rather than necessarily look at things.
    [Show full text]
  • An Antipodean Imaginary for Architecture+Philosophy Footprint
    69 An Antipodean Imaginary for Architecture+Philosophy: Fictocritical Approaches to Design Practice Research Hélène Frichot, Julieanna Preston, Michael Spooner, Sean Pickersgill, Zuzana Kovar, Ceri Hann, Megg Evans As a collective of PhD researchers (past and fictocriticism will be ventured and reframed for archi- present) provisionally gathered within the tecture. This approach will be elaborated by Hélène Architecture+Philosophy Research Group, RMIT Frichot who has had the opportunity to offer super- University, we will present a series of design visorial guidance to researchers presenting their explorations that are representative of our design design research below. Fictocriticism for architec- practice research.1 With the conjunctive capacity ture assumes the constructive, creative and critical of architecture and philosophy we emphasize the situatedness of the thinking-designer in the midst ongoing importance of the relay between these of their problematic field.2 We place an emphasis disciplines, also activated in our work through the on critical and creative invention and the structured productive relations between critical theory and indeterminacy that manifests in the wild association practice. We assume an expanded definition of of images and ideas that procure innovative as well architectural design practice, which includes digital as politically engaged minoritarian architectures. immersive environments, unbuilt (even unbuildable) There endures an engagement with minorities, and architectures, installation and participatory perform- minor literatures (including sub-canonical architec- ance-based works, and also, importantly, includes tures), feminist approaches, queer intertextualities, the critical and creative practice of writing-architec- as well as teratological mixtures of the natural and ture, often through the deployment of fiction. These the cultural.
    [Show full text]
  • Postmodern Architecture and the “Culture of Flimsiness” in Queensland
    QUOTATION: What does history have in store for architecture today? “The Pleasures Functions of Architecture” Postmodern Architecture and the “Culture of flimsiness” in Queensland Elizabeth Musgrave The University of Queensland and the University of Melbourne Abstract This paper explores the capacity of the quotation to resonate with essential truths, thereby entering the mainstream lexicon and through use and reuse, become detached from its source. It will explore this phenomenon through a short account of architecture in Queensland and its connection to events leading up and contributing to the 1984 Royal Australian Institute of Architects National Convention held in Brisbane from 16 to 19 June and resort venues ‘beyond’ including Dunk Island, Cairns, Kooralbyn and the Gold Coast. Leveraging its title epiphorically from the Institute’s 1980 Sydney convention, “The Functions of Architecture” conference in Brisbane sought a similar outcome to the earlier “The Pleasures of Architecture”, event; clarity and direction in the variety of “Attitudes” then expressed within Australian architecture. The reception of post-modernism by architects in Queensland is at once similar to and different from its reception in other centres in Australia. The lingering national debate between adherents of an orthodox modernism and “Post-modernists” had political, social and economic rather than ideological dimensions in the Sunshine State. It was further complicated by the presence of a group of young practitioners who came to be associated with regionalism and whose work has been variously described as “Visually light”, “layered”, and “ephemeral”. Drawing on interviews and commentary in Architecture Australia and the Institute’s Chapter News, this paper constructs an account of “The Function of Architecture” conference and describes the context for the emergence of a particularly apt descriptor of Queensland architecture, the origins of which had been become lost in the mists of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Romaldo Giurgola in Australia and the ‘Other’ Modern Tradition
    The University of Adelaide Romaldo Giurgola in Australia and the ‘Other’ Modern Tradition Stephen G. Schrapel Aldo Giurgola, 2005 by Mandy Martin. Ochre, pigment and oil on linen. Collection: National Portrait Gallery, Canberra. Commissioned in recognition of Giurgola’s life-long contribution to architecture and funded by voluntary donations from members and friends of the architectural profession. Gift of the Royal Australian Institute of Architects 2005. A thesis submitted to the University of Adelaide in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2015 Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................... v Declaration ............................................................................................................... vii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................... ix Chapter 1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 11 Romaldo Giurgola: A brief portrait ..................................................................... 15 Overview of post–Parliament House (1983) works ............................................. 18 Structure ............................................................................................................... 26 Chapter 2 Situating Giurgola ....................................................................................... 29 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • MELBOURNE: SETTLEMENT to GOLD 21,221 Words, 23 May 2012
    School of Design (TAFE) MELBOURNE: SETTLEMENT TO GOLD 21,221 words, 23 May 2012 Week 26 Terms Sod, wattle and daub, slab, adobe, cob, Pattern Book. Background Journey to Australia. Trauma of settlement in the wilderness. No building skills. Buildings first influenced by English rural vernacular. Historic development Settlement at Sorrento, 1803. Failed, due to a source of sufficent fresh water. Settlement at Corinella, Western Port Bay, 1826. Only some bricks survive. Melbourne was settled in 1835, illegally, by land-hungry pastoralists from Launceston. The District of Port Phillip, in the Colony of New South Wales was imposed on the settlers. Although not generally acknowledged as such, it was the only settlement in Australia unsanctioned by any government. Gold was discovered in 1851, at Warrandyte and Clunes: instant wealth. Gold towns Clunes. Building types: cottages, post office, banks, rail link (in 1862 to Ballarat and 1864 to Castlemaine), hotels, store, town hall, and schools particularly following the Education Act, 1873. Primitive buildings: material types Thatch, eg: haystacks and barns using reeds, near Hopetoun. 1 School of Design (TAFE) Sod, eg: at Parwan. This was the main material for early Melbourne, particularly for labourers houses. The was turf selected, mown, ploughed, and cut with a hatchet. Walls were 1,300 mm thick. Bark, eg: at the Seven Creeks Station, near Longford. Roofing and cladding. Poles frame and holding down. Axe cut, singed. Wood pegs fixing. They lasted 10-12 years. Two men could strip 40 - 60 trees/day. Wattle and Daub, eg: near Alberton, French Island and at Bacchus Marsh. More sophisticated, generally not in Melbourne.
    [Show full text]