Supporting Tanzania's Cocoa Farmers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Supporting Tanzania's Cocoa Farmers cover 12-3 research report:Layout 1 3/14/13 10:46 AM Page 1 Y R E SE LI C AR O C H P Supporting Tanzania’s Cocoa Farmers F T O R E N DE V EL O P M REPOA P.O. Box 33223, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania By A. Nyomora, Z. Kanyeka and A. Ndunguru 157 Mgombani Street, Regent Estate Tel: +255(0) (22) 270 00 83 / 277 25 56 Fax: +255(0) (22) 277 57 38 Email: [email protected] C Y R ES EA LI R C O H P Website: www.repoa.or.tz F T O R E N DE V EL O P M ISBN: 978 - 9987 - 615 -69 - 8 REPOA, is an independent, non-profit organization concerned with poverty and related policy issues in Tanzania. REPOA undertakes and facilitates research, enables monitoring, and promotes capacity building, dialogue and knowledge sharing. REPOA’s research agenda is concerned with poverty and its alleviation. Our objectives are to: • develop the research capacity in Tanzania; • enhance stakeholders’ knowledge of poverty issues and empower them to act; • contribute to policy dialogue; • support the monitoring of the implementation of poverty related policy; • strengthen national and international poverty research networks, and forge linkages between research(ers) and users. It is our conviction that research provides the means for the acquisition of knowledge necessary for improving the quality of welfare in Tanzanian society. REPOA’s Research Reports contain the result of research financed by REPOA. Our Special Papers contain the findings of commissioned studies conducted under our programmers of research, training and capacity building. The authors of these research reports and special papers are entitled to use their material in other publications; with acknowledgement to REPOA. REPOA has published the results from this research as part of our mandate to disseminate information. Any views expressed are those of the authors alone and Research Report should not be attributed to REPOA. 12/3 Supporting Tanzania’s Cocoa Farmers By A. Nyomora, Z. Kanyeka and A. Ndunguru Research Reports 12/3 Published for: Research on Poverty Alleviation (REPOA) P.O. Box 33223, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania 157 Mgombani Street, Regent Estate Tel: +255(0) (22) 2700083 / 2772556 Fax: +255(0) (22) 2775738 Email: [email protected] Website: www.repoa.or.tz Design: TI Ltd. Suggested Citation: A. Nyomora, Z. Kanyeka and A. Ndunguru ‘Supporting Tanzania’s Cocoa Farmers ’ Research Report 12/3, Dar es Salaam, REPOA Suggested Keywords: Cocoa, household income, food security, cocoa production, livelihoods and poverty reduction © REPOA, 2012 ISBN 978 9987 615 69 8 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without the written permission of the copyright holder or the publisher. Table of Contents List of Tables ........................................................................................... iv List of Figures .......................................................................................... v Abbreviations ........................................................................................... vi Acknowledgements ...............................…………………………………… vii Executive Summary ................................................................................. viii 1. Introduction & Background to the Study ........................................... 1 2. Research Objectives and Methodology ............................................. 4 3. Study Findings and Analysis .…………………………………………… 7 3.1 Profiles of Cocoa Farmers – Demographical information .............. 7 3.2 Land and Plant Ownership according to Age of Farmers ............. 8 3.3 Current Status of Cocoa Production ............................................ 9 3.4 Cocoa Prices and Marketing ........................................................ 13 3.5 Contribution of Cocoa to District Council’s Revenues .................. and Farmers’ Incomes ................................................................. 16 3.6 Contribution of Cocoa to Household Food Security ..................... 20 3.7 Constraints to Cocoa Production ................................................ 22 4. Conclusions and Recommendations ……………………………………… 25 References............................................................................. ................. 30 Annexes 1: Conceptual Models of Poverty .......................................................... 32 2: World Cocoa Production: Facts and Figures ..................................... 33 3: Cocoa Trading Companies in Kyela District ...................................... 34 4: Survey Questionnaire for the Kyela Cocoa Farmers .......................... 36 Publications by REPOA ....................................................................... 38 iii List of tables Table 1 Surveyed divisions, Wards and Villages within Kyela District ........................... 6 Table 2 Characteristics of Cocoa Growers by Division .................................................. 7 Table 3 Age Disaggregated Ownership of Cocoa Plants .............................................. 8 Table 4 A comparison between Cocoa Yields and Yields from other Crops ................................................................................................ 9 Table 5 Overview of Cultivated Areas and Cropping Systems ..................................... 10 Table 6 Reasons Given for Not Processing Cocoa Beans ............................................. 14 Table 7 Buying, Selling and Transporting Cocoa Beans in Kyela ................................. 15 Table 8 Sources Used by Farmers to Obtain Cocoa Prices in Kyela District ................ 16 Table 9 Kyela District Revenues Earned from Cocoa Sales ......................................... 17 Table 10 Gross and Net Incomes Accrued by Growers from Cocoa .............................. 19 Table 11 Building Materials used in Different Cocoa Producing Areas ........................... 20 Table 12 A comparison of self-sufficient, non-self sufficient and surplus-producing Households ......................................................................... 21 Table 13 Food consumption patterns between divisions and Cocoa producing areas (%) .............................................................................. 21 Table 14 Contribution of Cocoa on Grower’s Ability to Purchase Goods and Services .. 22 Table 15 Key Constraints to Cocoa Production as identified by farmers in Kyela District 23 Table 16 Key interventions to improve Cocoa production as suggested by Kyela Farmers ............................................................................................... 24 iv List of figures Figure 1 Age of Cocoa Trees found in Kyela District ......................................... 11 Figure 2 Cocoa Harvesting – Annual Trends ..................................................... 12 Figure 3 Trends in Cocoa Bean Production, 2003 – 20008 ............................... 12 Figure 4a A Comparison of Wet and Dry Cocoa Prices in Unyakusa between 2003 & 2008 ......................................................................... 13 Figure 4b A Comparison of Wet and Dry Cocoa Prices in Ntebela between 2003 & 2008 .......................................................................... 14 Figure 5 Trend of Cocoa Income by Household from 2003/04 – 2007/08 ................................................................................ 17 Figure 6a Contribution of Various Crops to total Household Income, Unyakyusa, 2007/08 ............................................................................. 18 Figure 6b Contribution of Various Crops to total Household Income, Nteleba, 2007/08 .................................................................................. 18 Figure 7 Household Uses of Income from Cocoa .............................................. 19 v Abbreviations DALDO - District Agricultural and Livestock Development Office DED - District Executive Officer EPOPA - Export Promotion of Organic Products from Africa GDP - Gross Domestic Product HH - Household IFOAM - International Federation for Organic Agriculture Movement KYECU - Kyela Co-operative Union IMR - Infant mortality rate MMR - Maternal Mortality Ratio MAFSC - Ministry of Agriculture, Food Security and Cooperatives NARS - National Agricultural Research Systems NHP - Net Household Product REPOA - Research on Poverty Alleviation TOAM - Tanzania Organic Agriculture Movement TANCOCERT - Tanzania Organic Certification Association vi Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to REPOA for the financial support to undertake this study, and to the District Agricultural Office in Kyela for their cooperation during the survey. We are also indebted to the cocoa growers and ward agricultural extension staff who agreed to be interviewed. Thanks also to Professor Mwakabumbe, the District Executive Director, the General Manager of KYECU, and the managers of Biolands, OLAM, HAI and Mohamed Enterprises Ltd. vii Executive Summary Background to the study: Agriculture is the leading sector of the Tanzanian economy, and the most critical for inclusive pro-poor growth. Agriculture provides employment for more than three quarters of the population, accounts for 75% of the country’s exports, and contributes almost 50% to Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Cocoa was introduced into Tanzania in the 1950s, and was being grown commercially within a decade. Although it tends to be considered a relatively minor non-traditional cash crop, it is currently supports an estimated 25,000 farmers and their families (or around 100,000 people). At the moment, around 80% of the
Recommended publications
  • 1.0. Introduction
    FERTILITY LEVELS AND PATTERNS AMONG HIV-INFECTED AND UN-INFECTED WOMEN IN KYELA DISTRICT A CASE STUDY FROM TANZANIA. 1.0. Introduction The fertility transition, seen in many parts of the world, has been slow to start in Sub-Saharan Africa, although recent evidence suggests a moderate of fertility in few countries (UNAIDS, 2003). It is not clear how the HIV epidemic will alter future levels of fertility and what impact it will have on the nature of fertility transition. The contribution of HIV/AIDS to the fertility transition is not currently evident due to the fact that. For four reasons. First, isolating the factor of HIV/AIDS from other factors of fertility is a complex process because it is not a proximate variable, but one of the contributors to several proximate determinants of fertility. Secondly, for the impact of the epidemic to be felt, the prevalence has to be high in the region of 20 percent and be sustainable for a long time, about a decade or longer. Thirdly, behavior factors may reduce fertility of women with symptoms of AIDS, but not those asymptomatic. Fourthly, as infant mortality increases, the need to replace dead children and produce more to ensure survival of some will challenge implementation of family planning programmes in Sub-Saharan Africa and perhaps increase fertility. Also, increasing HIV prevalence in the region will mean that HIV/AIDS programmes will compete for resources with family planning progrmmes, which would weaken the latter (UNAIDS, 2003). Recent studies in Sub Saharan Africa have shown that fertility is reduced among HIV infected women compare with uninfected women.
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of Science Arts and Commerce a History of Rungwe
    International Journal of Science Arts and Commerce Vol. 2 No. 2, April-2017 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE ARTS AND COMMERCE A HISTORY OF RUNGWE DISTRICT IN TANZANIA FROM PRE-COLONIAL TO COLONIAL PERIOD Reginald Mwakilambo Department of History, The Open University of Tanzania Abstract This article highlights the historical events that occurred in Rungwe District, Tanzania in pre colonial and colonial periods. It gives an analysis of the situation during the pre-colonial period and how the district became integrated in the capitalist economic system after the establishment of colonial rule. Capitalist relations were in terms of the establishment of cash crop estates as an element of colonial economic structure. Both peasant-type and estate productions involved productions for exports to metropolitan countries by firmly solidifying world capitalist economic relations as the metropoles were set ready to receive processed products from the district. 1.0 Introduction Rungwe District lies between longitudes “80 30′ and 90 30′ E” and latitudes “330 and 340 S” in the southern part of Mbeya Region.1 It is bordered by Mbeya District to the North, Makete District in Njombe Region to the East, Kyela District in the South and Ileje District in the West. The district consists of four divisions, which are “Ukukwe, Busokelo, Pakati and Tukuyu.”2 The geographical boundaries of the district have never been fixed in the past, but they have been changing by differently defined by the previous colonial governments of the Germans and British, and later by the independent government of the United Republic of Tanzania. The beginning of German colonial rule in Rungwe District was in 1893 by the German explorer Major Von Wissmann who founded a government station at a place along Lake Nyasa which was given the name “Langenburg” in the honour of “Prinz von Hohenlohe-Langenburg” the champion of German colonial endeavours (currently known as Lumbila in Ludewa District).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices to Vol 4B
    Vote 78 Mbeya Region Councils in the Region Council District Councils Code 2007 Mbeya City Council 2030 Tunduma Town Council 3037 Chunya District Council 3038 Ileje District Council 3039 Kyela District Council 3040 Mbeya District Council 3041 Mbozi District Council 3042 Rungwe District Council 3087 Mbarali District Council 3114 Momba District Council 3140 Busokelo District Council 2 Vote 78 Mbeya Region Council Development Budget Summary Local and Foreign 2014/15 Code Council Local Foreign Total 2007 Mbeya City Council 8,280,514,000 5,106,984,000 13,387,498,000 3037 Chunya District Council 4,450,970,000 2,595,407,000 7,046,377,000 3038 Ileje District Council 1,436,699,000 1,582,949,000 3,019,648,000 3039 Kyela District Council 3,401,266,000 1,787,462,000 5,188,728,000 3040 Mbeya District Council 2,944,629,000 4,125,608,000 7,070,237,000 3041 Mbozi District Council 3,507,815,000 2,575,614,000 6,083,429,000 3042 Rungwe District Council 3,275,065,000 2,500,384,000 5,775,449,000 3087 Mbarali District Council 3,348,680,000 6,568,598,000 9,917,278,000 3114 Momba District Council 4,121,306,000 1,674,222,000 5,795,528,000 3140 Busokelo District Council 2,676,586,000 991,371,000 3,667,957,000 Total 37,443,530,000 29,508,599,000 66,952,129,000 3 Vote 78 Mbeya Region Code Description 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 Actual Expenditure Approved Expenditure Estimates Local Foreign Local Foreign Local Foreign Total Shs.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Pressures and Heritage Resources in Rungwe District, Southern Highlands of Tanzania
    Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 2016, 4, 79-90 Published Online March 2016 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/gep http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/gep.2016.43007 Managing the Balance: Ecological Pressures and Heritage Resources in Rungwe District, Southern Highlands of Tanzania Makarius Peter Itambu Department of Archaeology and Heritage, University of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Received 1 December 2015; accepted 25 March 2016; published 28 March 2016 Copyright © 2016 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract Rungwe district in Mbeya region is amongst the many areas in Tanzania which until recently have remained terra incognita in terms of ecological and archaeological research. Systematic archaeo- logical investigations, based on heritage management and conservation have not been undertaken. In due regard, we decided to carry out the first systematic survey, documentation and recording of the heritage resources of this district. Our investigations emphasized public participation in the management and conservation of heritage resources with the involvement of local people the central focus. We were also motivated by the desire to launch community outreach programmes and establish the “Cultural-Ecological Research and Scientific Information Centre” in Masoko-Kisi- ba Ward. There were several meetings with the local people and the village officials to discuss plans. It was decided that the establishment of the deemed scientific and information centre would abide with the existing conservation laws in order to effectively address the strategies for protection, conservation and management of both natural and cultural heritage resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Mbeya District Socio-Economic Profile
    THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA MBEYA DISTRICT SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE MBEYA DISTRICT Joint Publication by: THE PLANNING COMMISSION DAR ES SALAAM and MBEYA DISTRICT COUNCIL MBEYA TABLE OF CONTENTS Page FOREWORD......................................................................................................................iv SECTION I.......................................................................................................................... 1 1.0 LAND PEOPLE CLIMATE AND AGRO ECONOMIC ZONES:........................ 1 1.1 GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION:........................................................................................1 1.2 LAND AREA:...................................................................................................................1 1.3 ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS:............................................................................................5 1.4 DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS:...........................................................................6 1.5 CLIMATE VEGETATION AND TOPOGRAPHY:.........................................................20 1.6 DRAINAGE SYSTEM:...................................................................................................21 1.7 AGRO - ECONOMIC ZONES:........................................................................................21 SECTION II.......................................................................................................................23 2.0 SOCIAL SERVICES:...............................................................................................23
    [Show full text]
  • Submission Requirements
    CROP PROTECTION PROGRAMME Project Title: On-farm verification and promotion of green manure for enhancing upland rice productivity on Striga infested fields in Tanzania R 8436 (ZA0660) FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT Start date – End date (1 APRIL 2005 - 31 January 2006) Ambonesigwe. M. Mbwaga Ilonga, Agricultural Research Institute Date FTR completed____31st January 2006 "This publication is an output from a research project R8436 within the Crop Protection Programme funded by the United Kingdom Department for International Development for the benefit of developing countries. The views expressed are not necessarily those of DFID” RESEARCH TEAM Tanzania Department of Research and Development Ilonga Agricultural Research Institute, Kilosa Dr. A. M. Mbwaga (Plant Pathologist/Striga specialist) Project Leader Mr C. Massawe (plant protectionist) Mlingano Agricultural Research Institute, Tanga Dr. G. Ley (Soil scientist) Uyole Agricultural Research Institute, Mbeya Dr J. Kayeke (Weed scientist/Agronomist) Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro Dr. J. P. Hella (Agricultural economist) District Councils Morogoro Rural District Council E. Masangya (Crops, subject matter specialist) Mrs E. Kishinda (District Education Officer) Kyela District Council Mr M. Mwampaja (Crops, subject matter specialist) Mrs V. Mbena (District Education Officer) INADES Formation Tanzania Mr P Lameck (Farmer Group Specialist) Natural Resources Institute, UK Dr. C.R. Riches (Weed Scientist/Agronomist) 1 CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY………………………………………………………………………. 3 BACKGROUND…………………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Kyela District Investment Profile
    THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA PRESIDENT’S OFFICE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT KYELA DISTRICT INVESTMENT PROFILE KYELA DISTRICT COUNCIL ` P. O. Box 320 KYELA , MBEYA. PHONE: 025-2540035 025-2540007 FAX: 025-2540425 [email protected] SEPTEMBER, 2019 i Table of Content FOREWORD………………………………………………………………………………………..……………….iii ABBREVIATION……………....……………………………………………………………………………..….…1 CHAPTER 1……………………………………………………………………………………….………………….1 1.0 Overview of the council…………………………………………………………………………………….1 1.1 Introduction………………………………………………………..…………………………….….1 1.2 Population…………………………………………………………………………………………….1 1.3 Administration Frame Work ……………………………………………………………………1 1.4 Ethnic group………………………………………………………………………………………….1 1.5 Location………………………………………………………………………………………..……..1 1.5.1Topography………………………………………………………………………………..……..2 1.6 Climate………………………………………………………………………..……………………...3 1.7 Land use pattern…………………………………………………………………….……….…..3 1.8 Infrastructure in Kyela District………………………………………………………….……3 1.8.1 Roads…………………………………………………..……………………………...3 1.8.2 Financial services………………………………………………………………..….4 1.8.3 Telecommunications and Posts …………………………………..………....4 1.8.4 Water supply ……………………………………………………………………..…4 1.8.5 Power supply …………………………………………………………………………4 1.9 Economy ………………………………………………...………………………………………5 1.9.1 Agriculture…………………………………………….….…………………………..5 1.9.2 Animal husbandry………………………………..………………………………..6 1.9.3 Distribution and supply chain…………………………………..……………..6 1.9.4 Industrial development ………………………….……………………..……….6 CHAPTER 2………………………………………………………………….……………………..……………….8
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Analysis in Rice Production in Kyela District
    GENDER ANALYSIS IN RICE PRODUCTION IN KYELA DISTRICT, MBEYA REGION- TANZANIA THABITIHASSAN THABITI A DESSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT OFSOKOINEUNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE.MOROGORO,TANZANIA. 2014 ii ABSTRACT Rice is the second most important food and commercial crop in Tanzania after maize.This study was designed to conduct gender analysis in rice production in Kyela district. This study was designed to conduct gender analysis in rice production in Kyela district. The study covered four randomly selected villages of Katumba, Mpunguti, Kasala andTenende. Data were analysed to obtain the descriptive statistics, Harvard analytical framework of activity profile were employed to assess gender roles in rice production, independent t-test was employed to compare rice production between male and female headed householdsand one way ANOVA used to test mean differences of rice production between MHH’s and FHH’s while multiple linear regression used to identify gender related socio-cultural factors that influence rice production. The study found that among MHH’s and FHH’s, who were literate, had higher rice production than illiterate ones. However, gender roles and time spent in rice production are almost equal. Furthermore, on the overall access and control over resources of MHH’s and FHH’s revealed that,(57%) male had higher access. In accessing to credit (49%), therefore, in order to improve gender on rice production education should be encouraged in the households’ members to uplift gender sensitivity and awareness in the households and access and control over resources should consider gender. It is recommended that in order to improve gender participation in rice production,awareness raising on equality and equity in access and control over resources, including access and control over land, and access to education among household members should be improved.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Mbeya City Council
    Council Subvote Index 78 Mbeya Region Subvote Description Council District Councils Number Code 2007 Mbeya City Council 5003 Internal Audit 5004 Admin and HRM 5005 Trade and Economy 5006 Administration and Adult Education 5007 Primary Education 5008 Secondary Education 5009 Land Development & Urban Planning 5010 Health Services 5011 Preventive Services 5012 Health Centres 5013 Dispensaries 5014 Works 5017 Rural Water Supply 5022 Natural Resources 5027 Community Development, Gender & Children 5032 Salaries for MEOs 5033 Agriculture 5034 Livestock 5036 Environments 3037 Chunya District Council 5003 Internal Audit 5004 Admin and HRM 5005 Trade and Economy 5006 Administration and Adult Education 5007 Primary Education 5008 Secondary Education 5009 Land Development & Urban Planning 5010 Health Services 5011 Preventive Services 5012 Health Centres 5013 Dispensaries 5014 Works 5017 Rural Water Supply 5022 Natural Resources 5027 Community Development, Gender & Children 5031 Salaries for VEOs 5033 Agriculture 5034 Livestock 5036 Environments 3038 Ileje District Council 5003 Internal Audit 5004 Admin and HRM 5005 Trade and Economy 5006 Administration and Adult Education 5007 Primary Education 5008 Secondary Education 5009 Land Development & Urban Planning ii Council Subvote Index 78 Mbeya Region Subvote Description Council District Councils Number Code 3038 Ileje District Council 5010 Health Services 5011 Preventive Services 5012 Health Centres 5013 Dispensaries 5014 Works 5017 Rural Water Supply 5022 Natural Resources 5027 Community Development,
    [Show full text]
  • Mbeya Region Socio-Economic Profile
    THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA MBEYA REGION SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE UGANDA RWANDA KENYA BURUNDI MBEYA ZAMBIA MSUMBIJI Joint Publication by: THE PLANNING COMMISSION DAR ES SALAAM and REGIONAL COMMISSIONER'S OFFICE MBEYA TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages FOREWORD..........................................................................................................................v SECTION I.............................................................................................................................1 LAND POPULATION AND CLIMATE:...........................................................................1 GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION:................................................................................................ 1 REGIONAL AREA AND ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS............................................................ 1 ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISIONS:............................................................................................. 2 LAND USE: ............................................................................................................................ 4 (III) 1.2.1 ETHNIC GROUPS:................................................................................................... 7 (IV) 1.2.2 POPULATION SIZE AND GROWTH:.................................................................... 7 POPULATION DENSITY AND DISTRIBUTION: .......................................................12 MIGRATION:......................................................................................................................19 1.1.4
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Material Plate 1A. Typical Pig Slaughter Slab in The
    Supplementary material Plate 1a. Typical pig slaughter slab in the Southern Highlands, United Republic of Tanzania. Note that the slab is located upstream with many community downstream and a seasonal watercourse (stream) that serves the communities. Wastewater from the slaughter activities often overflow from the holding tanks and flow into and contaminate the stream. This may serve as source of pathogen for animals who drink routinely from the water. Plate 1b. The slaughter slab showing many ongoing activities including interactions between farmers, butchers and slaughter assistants, the transporter waiting with their motorcycles to transport the pork and pig products, a pig brought for slaughter interacting with a scavenging pig, and the veterinary inspector conducting a post-mortem inspection on the carcass before release. Pathogens 2019, 8, x; doi: FOR PEER REVIEW www.mdpi.com/journal/pathogens Pathogens 2019, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 4 Plate 1c. Pigs, either scavenging or brought for slaughter were observed in the vicinity of the slaughter facility roaming freely and having contracts with remnants from the pig slaughter slabs. Where these pigs were not bought up for slaughter, they are kept for some days in the neighbourhood of the slaughter slabs and are later returned to farms of origin, potentially carrying infection back to the farms. Pathogens 2019, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 4 Supplementary Notes Spatio-temporal distributions of outbreaks of ASF in the Southern Highlands, Tanzania In November 2010, outbreaks of ASF were first reported in Kyela district of Mbeya region. Kyela district shares international boundaries with Malawi and legal and illegal trades of livestock occur across the borders.
    [Show full text]
  • De-Agrarianisation and Rural Employment Network
    DE-AGRARIANISATION AND RURAL EMPLOYMENT NETWORK Afrika-Studiecentrum, Leiden Institute of Resource Assessment, Dar es Salaam Changing Village Land, Labour and Livelihoods: Rungwe and Kyela Districts, Tanzania Davis Mwamfupe ASC Working Paper 29 / 1998 Copies may be ordered from: Afrika-Studiecentrum P.O. Box 9555 2300 RB Leiden The Netherlands Fax 31-71-527-3344 Email: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Background to the Study Districts 1 Ethnic Composition of the Population 2 Economy 2 Agrarian History 3 Historical Migratory Patterns 3 Urbanisation 4 Kyimo and Ngonga Village Surveys 5 Village Location and Infrastructure 5 Demographic Characteristics of Respondents 6 Educational Characteristics of Respondents 8 Village Economic Activities 9 Diminishing Agricultural Prospects 14 Changing Household Composition and Structure 17 Non-Farm Activities 18 Changing Incidence and Types of Non-Farm Activities 18 Significance of Non-Farm Activities (NFAs) 19 Education and Training 20 Duration and Scale of Non-Farm Activities 22 Local Factors Contributing to the Growth of Non-Farm Activities 22 Occupational Preferences 24 Non-Farm Activities and Social Status 26 Conclusions 27 References 29 Appendix : Village Research Methodology 30 Preface This working paper provides research findings emanating from the De- Agrarianisation and Rural Employment (DARE) Research Programme funded by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs and coordinated by the Afrika-Studiecentrum in conjunction with African research teams from institutions in Ethiopia, Nigeria, Tanzania and South Africa. We wish to acknowledge the encouragement of Hans Slot of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the editorial skills of Ann Reeves for providing vital back-up for the work of the programme's research teams.
    [Show full text]