DOCSLIB.ORG

Mbeya District Socio-Economic Profile

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mbeya District Socio-Economic Profile THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA MBEYA DISTRICT SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE MBEYA DISTRICT Joint Publication by: THE PLANNING COMMISSION DAR ES SALAAM and MBEYA DISTRICT COUNCIL MBEYA TABLE OF CONTENTS Page FOREWORD......................................................................................................................iv SECTION I.......................................................................................................................... 1 1.0 LAND PEOPLE CLIMATE AND AGRO ECONOMIC ZONES:........................ 1 1.1 GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION:........................................................................................1 1.2 LAND AREA:...................................................................................................................1 1.3 ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS:............................................................................................5 1.4 DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS:...........................................................................6 1.5 CLIMATE VEGETATION AND TOPOGRAPHY:.........................................................20 1.6 DRAINAGE SYSTEM:...................................................................................................21 1.7 AGRO - ECONOMIC ZONES:........................................................................................21 SECTION II.......................................................................................................................23 2.0 SOCIAL SERVICES:...............................................................................................23 2.1 EDUCATION SECTOR..................................................................................................23 2.1.1 Primary Education:.........................................................................................23 2.1.2 Secondary Education:.....................................................................................40 2.1.2.1 Primary School leavers: ..............................................................................40 2.1.3 Adult Education:..............................................................................................47 2.1.4 Pre-Primary Education:..................................................................................49 2.2 WATER SECTOR: ...................................................................................................50 2.2.1 INTRODUCTION:.......................................................................................................50 2.2.2 SITUATION OF WATER SUPPLY (WATER SCHEMES):......................................52 2.2.3 SANITATION:............................................................................................................56 23 HEALTH SECTOR ....................................................................................................56 2.3.1 INTRODUCTION:.......................................................................................................56 2.3.2 HEALTH SITUATION...............................................................................................58 2.3.3 OTHER HEALTH INDICATORS:...............................................................................62 i SECTION III .....................................................................................................................67 3.0 ECONOMIC INFRASTRUCTURE: .......................................................................67 3.1 Road Networks:.....................................................................................................67 ROAD NETWORK MAP - MBEYA DISTRICT.........................................................71 ..............................................................................................................................................71 3.2 OTHER COMMUNICATION NETWORK:...................................................................72 3.3 ENERGY:........................................................................................................................74 SECTION IV .....................................................................................................................76 4.0 THE DISTRICT ECONOMY:..................................................................................76 4.1 INTRODUCTION:..........................................................................................................76 4.2 DISTRICT GDP AND PER CAPITA GDP:...................................................................76 4.3 AGRICULTURE:............................................................................................................81 4.3.1 Introduction:.....................................................................................................81 4.3.2 FOOD CROPS:.............................................................................................................90 4.3.3. CASH CROP:..............................................................................................................97 4.3.4 FARM IMPLEMENTS:..............................................................................................102 4.3.5 FARM INPUTS:.........................................................................................................103 4.3.6 IRRIGATION SCHEMES:..........................................................................................104 4.3.7 FOOD STORAGE FACILITIES:................................................................................105 4.4 LIVESTOCK:...........................................................................................................106 4.4.1 GROWTH AND DISTRIBUTION:.............................................................................106 4.4.2 LIVESTOCK INFRASTRUCTURE:............................................................................114 SECTION V ....................................................................................................................116 5.0 NATURAL RESOURCES:.....................................................................................116 5.1 FORESTRY:..................................................................................................................116 5.1.2 FOREST PRODUCTS:...............................................................................................117 5.2 BEEKEEPING:.............................................................................................................118 5.3 WILDLIFE:..................................................................................................................122 5.4 FISHING:......................................................................................................................123 ii 5.5 TOURISM:....................................................................................................................125 5.6 MINING:......................................................................................................................125 SECTION VI...................................................................................................................127 6.0 OTHER DEVELOPMENT ISSUES:.....................................................................127 6.1 LOCAL GOVERNMENT:.............................................................................................127 6.2 COOPERATIVES:.........................................................................................................128 6.3 WOMEN IN DEVELOPMENT:...................................................................................129 6.4 NON-GOVERNMENT ORGANISATION (NGO) AND DONORS: ...........................131 SECTION VII.................................................................................................................132 7.0 POTENTIAL AREAS FOR INVESTMENT IN MB EYA DISTRICT:............132 7.1 AGRICULTURE:..........................................................................................................132 7.2 INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITIES:........................................................................................132 7.3 EDUCATION:...............................................................................................................133 7.4 TOURIST ACTIVITIES:..............................................................................................133 7.5 HEALTH:.....................................................................................................................134 7.6 OTHER POTENTIAL AREAS:....................................................................................134 8. ANNEXES ...................................................................................................................135 Mbeya Region in a Nutshell...................................................................................135 Women in Development:..........................................................................................137 DEVELOPMENT POTENTIALS AND PROSPECTS:.........................................141 Agriculture:...............................................................................................................141 Irrigation:..................................................................................................................141 Animal Husbandry:..................................................................................................143 Beekeeping:...............................................................................................................143 Fishing:......................................................................................................................144
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Investment Profile Water for Agriculture and Energy -Final Draft
    NATIONAL INVESTMENT PROFILE WATER FOR AGRICULTURE AND ENERGY -FINAL DRAFT- TANZANIA National Investment Profile. Water for Agriculture and Energy: Tanzania EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Tanzania’s vision for using water resources for agriculture and energy are firmly embedded in both irrigation and hydropower development policies respectively. These issues are both part of the Tanzania poverty eradication agenda in line with the Tanzania Development Vision 2025 and the five year National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty, commonly known as MKUKUTA I (2005-2010) and MKUKUTA II (2010-2015) which is currently underway. The key policies which are followed for agriculture and hydropower are further supported by the Continental movement towards Africa’s Green revolution. Tanzania has signed the Comprehensive Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) compact and has initiated a number of programs and reforms to increase the investment in the agricultural sector. These programs have a strong emphasis on irrigation. Despite a total irrigation development potential in Tanzania of 29.4 million ha, only 450 392 ha have been irrigated thus demonstrating the need to develop the sector. Furthermore, irrigation practices in Tanzania show low water use efficiency, low water productivity and over dependency on surface water as a major source for irrigation development. The increased investment via the CAADP Compact should be able to support the development of the sector. Hydropower in the country contributes almost 50 percent of the energy produced. On a large scale, hydropower is being developed as a combined hydro-thermal system. On a smaller scale, hydropower is used as a source of renewable energy and a way to increase rural electrification.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnopharmacological Study on Medicinal Plants Used to Treat Infectious Diseases in the Rungwe District, Tanzania
    International Journal of Medicinal Plants and Natural Products (IJMPNP) Volume 1, Issue 3, 2015, PP 15-23 ISSN 2454-7999 (Online) www.arcjournals.org Ethnopharmacological Study on Medicinal Plants Used to Treat Infectious Diseases in the Rungwe District, Tanzania Sheila M. Maregesi, Rogers Mwakalukwa Department of Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania smaregesi @hotmail.com Abstract: An ethnopharmacological survey was conducted in two villages of Rungwe district, Mbeya Region, Tanzania. In this area, the use of plants for the treatment of various diseases is still very high, especially infectious diseases which are endemic in the tropical countries and leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Information was obtained from one traditional healer and two other experienced persons, having some knowledge on medicinal plants. A total of twenty plants were reported for use in the treatment of various infectious conditions and were documented during the field study. These plants belong to 18 genera and 11 families of which Asteraceae was the most represented. Amongst uses of various phytoorgans, leaves ranked highest, the most used method of preparation being decoction (57%). The most frequently mentioned route of administration was oral. The plants recorded for treating chronic infectious conditions amounted to 38%. It was found out that, people in this area commonly use medicinal plants with trust they have built on the curative outcome witnessed. However, this creates a further work to test for the antimicrobial activity and standardization of herbal preparation if these plants proven to be safe. Keywords: Ethnopharmacology; Medicinal plants; Traditional medicine; Infectious diseases; Rungwe,Tanzan 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Governace Process in Tanzania 4
    221 Part REDD+ Governace Process in Tanzania 4 Chapter 223 10 Lessons Learned from REDD+ Pilot Projects in Kondoa and Rungwe Districts, Tanzania George C. Kajembe1, Dos Santos A. Silayo1, Khamaldin J. Mutabazi1, Fathihia Massawe1, Maria Nantongo3 and Arild Vatn2 Abstract Reduced deforestation and forest degradation ‘plus’ the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhanced carbon stock (REDD+) has been singled out as one of the core strategies against climate change. At the same time, forests offer important livelihoods. To acquire experience on how to establish REDD+ ‘on the ground’, REDD+ pilot projects were established in Tanzania. The pilots were expected to provide valuable insights on many issues that will likely be encountered by both the government and local communities as REDD+ develops to assist in future REDD+ initiative. This study was conducted to draw lessons from two REDD+ pilot projects in Kondoa and Rungwe districts in Dodoma and Mbeya regions, respectively. Structured questionnaires for households with both closed and open ended questions were used to collect socio-economic, institutional and livelihoods- 1 2 224 related information. Participatory rural appraisal (PRA) techniques, participant observation and focus group discussions (FGDs) were also employed. Results show that land and forests are the main livelihood assets in the two pilot project areas. Although REDD+ was generally accepted by most communities in the pilots, there were some levels of scepticism based on their past land use history. For example, the introduction of REDD+ in Kondoa faced rejection from some villages due to fears over land grabbing and exclusion from forest access. On the contrary, villages which depend solely on state-owned forests did not object to REDD+ as they are used to resource use exclusion mechanisms from such tenure systems.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sociolinguistic Survey of the Nyiha and Nyika Language Communities in Tanzania, Zambia and Malawi
    A Sociolinguistic Survey of the Nyiha and Nyika Language Communities in Tanzania, Zambia and Malawi Anna-Lena Lindfors, Mark Woodward and Louise Nagler Revised by Susanne Krüger SIL International 2009 SIL Electronic Survey Report 2009-012, September 2009 Copyright © 2009 Anna-Lena Lindfors, Mark Woodward, Louise Nagler, Susanne Krüger, and SIL International All rights reserved ABSTRACT This paper presents the findings of a sociolinguistic survey among the Nyiha and Nyika language communities in south-western Tanzania, Malawi and Zambia. The main purpose of the research was to clarify the extent of any dialect differences between the varieties that could impact the ongoing language development process in the Nyiha of Mbozi variety (Tanzania). The research was conducted in August, September and November 2004. The survey identified five different ethnic groups called Nyiha or Nyika in Tanzania, Zambia and Malawi. Research findings suggest that the Nyiha of Malawi/Zambia could possibly use written materials in the Nyiha of Mbozi variety. The Nyika of Malawi and the Nyiha of Sumbawanga (Tanzania) were found to speak varieties different enough to warrant their own language development efforts. The language variety spoken by the Nyika of Rungwe (Tanzania) was found to be not a variety of Nyiha or Nyika at all and was not further investigated. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The organisation of this paper 1.2 Acknowledgements 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 2.1 Language classification 2.2 Language areas and surrounding languages 2.3 Population
    [Show full text]
  • Resettlement Policy Framework (Rpf) for Proposed 340Km Mbeya –Tunduma–Sumbawanga 400Kv Transmission
    RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK (RPF) FOR PROPOSED 340KM MBEYA –TUNDUMA–SUMBAWANGA 400KV TRANSMISSION Public Disclosure Authorized LINE AND ~4KM TUNDUMA SUBSTATION TO TANZANIA-ZAMBIA BORDER 330KV TRANSMISSION LINE AND ASSOCIATED SUBSTATION AT TUNDUMA AND SUMBAWANGA Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized VOLUME I: MAIN RPF REPORT PROJECT PROPONENT: Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited (TANESCO), Umeme Park, Ubungo Area, P.O. Box 9024, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, Tel: +255 22 2451133, Fax: +255 22 2451149, E-mail: [email protected] Public Disclosure Authorized PREPARED BY: Ms. Elizabeth J. Aisu Individual Consultant, P.O. Box 20177 Kampala-Uganda Tel: +256 772 616 489, Fax: +255 22 2451149, E-mail: [email protected] 14th April, 2018 LIST OF EXPERTS The following experts were involved during preparation of this Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) for Mbeya-Tunduma-Sumbawanga 400kV Power TL and ~4km of segment of 330kV TL from Tunduma Substation to TanZam border as part of study team: S/N NAME EXPERTISE 1. Ms. Elizabeth Aisu RAP and RPF specialist –Team Leader 2. Ms. Vaileth Kimaro Sociologist 3. Mr. Fikirini M. Mtandika Environmentalist 4. Mr. Izaria Luvanda Land Surveyor 5. District Valuers, District Land Officers and All District where proposed TL traversed District Community Development Officers i TABLE OF CONTENTS List of experts ............................................................................................................................. i Table of contents .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Il UNITED REPUBLIC of TANZANIA IMPLEMENTATION of WATER
    Il UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA IATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY DANIDA 824 TZ.IR 85 IMPLEMENTATION OF WATER MASTER PLANS FOR IRINGA, RUVUMA AND MBEYA REGIONS HYDROLOGY - LOW FLOW GAUGINGS 1984 CARL BRO • COWiCONSULT • KAMPSAX - KRLJGER «CCKK I UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA DANISH INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY DANIDA IMPLEMENTATION OF WATER MASTER PLANS FOR IRINGA, RUVUMA AND MBEYA REGIONS HYDROLOGY - LOW FLOW GAUGINGS 1984 0 LIBRARY, INTERNA n:-NA-,. 1 : ! T .- i- iu/O -; j )] G.-.f. 141/14 L.G: CARL BRO • COWICONSULT • KAMPSAX - KRLJGER «CCKK I I I LOW FLOW STUDIES IN IRINGA, MBEYA AND RUVUMA REGIONS, TANZANIA I TABLE OF CONTENTS I Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 I 2. DESCRIPTION OF FIELD WORK 2 m 2.1 Low Flow Measurements 2 2.2 Network Station Visits 3 3. DATA ANALYSES 4 I 4. VILLAGE WATER DEMAND VERSUS AVAILABILITY 16 I 5. CORRELATION ANALYSIS 29 I 6. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 32 I APPENDIX 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1. INTRODUCTION The aim of the low flow study is to provide the best possible estimates I of the 10-year minimum flows at the selected sources of the village water supply schemes. Such estimates will form the basis for the final I design of the individual water supplies and for additional source I investigations where selected sources do not have sufficient yields. The low flow measurement programme was conducted during the months of September, October and November 1984. Two measurements were made at I most of the selected sites with approximately one month lag-time between them.
    [Show full text]
  • Naming System and Gender Construction in Safwa Ethnic Group
    The University of Dodoma University of Dodoma Institutional Repository http://repository.udom.ac.tz Humanities Master Dissertations 2013 Naming system and gender construction in safwa ethnic group Kibona, Neema The University of Dodoma Kibona, N. (2013). Naming system and gender construction in safwa ethnic group. Dodma: The University of Dodoma http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12661/1683 Downloaded from UDOM Institutional Repository at The University of Dodoma, an open access institutional repository. NAMING SYSTEM AND GENDER CONSTRUCTION IN SAFWA ETHNIC GROUP By Neema Kibona A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts in Linguistics of the University of Dodoma University of Dodoma October, 2013 CERTIFICATION The undersigned certifies that he has read and hereby recommends for acceptance by the University of Dodoma a dissertation entitled “Naming System and Gender Construction in Safwa ethnic group” in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts in Linguistics of the University of Dodoma. …………………………………………….. Prof. Casmir M. Rubagumya (SUPERVISOR) Date……………………………………………. i DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT I Neema Kibona declare that this dissertation is my own original work and that it has not been presented and will not be presented to any other University for a similar or any other degree award. Signature…………………………………… No part of this dissertation may be reproduced, stored in any retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by any means without prior written permission of the author or the University of Dodoma. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I am very thankful to my almighty God for his love and kindness on me.
    [Show full text]
  • The RICE Value Chain in Tanzania
    THE RICE VALUE CHAIN IN TANZANIA A report from the Southern Highlands Food Systems Programme R. Trevor Wilson I. Lewis This background paper is made available without further edits to the version presented by its authors. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. © FAO, 2015 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-request or addressed to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • 1.0. Introduction
    FERTILITY LEVELS AND PATTERNS AMONG HIV-INFECTED AND UN-INFECTED WOMEN IN KYELA DISTRICT A CASE STUDY FROM TANZANIA. 1.0. Introduction The fertility transition, seen in many parts of the world, has been slow to start in Sub-Saharan Africa, although recent evidence suggests a moderate of fertility in few countries (UNAIDS, 2003). It is not clear how the HIV epidemic will alter future levels of fertility and what impact it will have on the nature of fertility transition. The contribution of HIV/AIDS to the fertility transition is not currently evident due to the fact that. For four reasons. First, isolating the factor of HIV/AIDS from other factors of fertility is a complex process because it is not a proximate variable, but one of the contributors to several proximate determinants of fertility. Secondly, for the impact of the epidemic to be felt, the prevalence has to be high in the region of 20 percent and be sustainable for a long time, about a decade or longer. Thirdly, behavior factors may reduce fertility of women with symptoms of AIDS, but not those asymptomatic. Fourthly, as infant mortality increases, the need to replace dead children and produce more to ensure survival of some will challenge implementation of family planning programmes in Sub-Saharan Africa and perhaps increase fertility. Also, increasing HIV prevalence in the region will mean that HIV/AIDS programmes will compete for resources with family planning progrmmes, which would weaken the latter (UNAIDS, 2003). Recent studies in Sub Saharan Africa have shown that fertility is reduced among HIV infected women compare with uninfected women.
    [Show full text]
  • Ileje SP FULL
    PREFACE Ileje District Council has a vital role of ensuring that effective coordination and supervision of service delivery Targets is in place so that stakeholders deliver quality services to the community and practice good governance in the development of the District. In order to achieve the above Strategic Objective, Ileje District Council through its Departments will strengthen its cooperation with all stakeholders through the existing government machinery. It will make sure that the policies are properly translated and implemented by her stakeholders in order to achieve sustainable development. The Medium Term Strategic Plan (MTSP) for the Ileje District Council (IDC) 2017/2018 - 2020/2021 is aimed at building the capacity of the Council and its stakeholders towards promoting economic growth with consequent poverty reduction among the local communities, with due emphasis. Ileje District Council will ensure that the set key result areas, strategic objectives and strategies are effectively implemented and monitored. Stakeholder shall be called upon to cooperate in the implementation of the District’s Strategic Plan. Therefore Government, Development Partners and Community are urged to give their maximum contribution and support according to their commitments in order to facilitate execution of the Council Medium Term Strategic Plan. Success in implementing the service delivery targets and strategic objectives of Ileje District Council will contribute greatly to the overall success in the achievement of National goals by improving its economy and reduce poverty among the population. ___________________ Ubatizo J. Songa DISTRICT CHAIRERSON, ILEJE. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This Strategic Plan for 2017/2018 – 2020/2021 has been prepared in collaboration with a number of individuals and institutions including District and Ward political leaders, Council staff, Ward Executive Officers and Extension Staff, representatives from Public Institutions, Business Community and the Media.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the State of Pastoralists' Human Rights in Tanzania
    REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ HUMAN RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 [Area Surveyed: Handeni, Kilindi, Bagamoyo, Kibaha, Iringa-Rural, Morogoro, Mvomero, Kilosa, Mbarali and Kiteto Districts] Cover Picture: Maasai warriors dancing at the initiation ceremony of Mr. Kipulelia Kadege’s children in Handeni District, Tanga Region, April 2006. PAICODEO Tanzania Funded By: IWGIA, Denmark 1 REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ HUMAN RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 [Area Surveyed: Handeni, Kilindi, Bagamoyo, Kibaha, Iringa-Rural, Morogoro-Rural, Mvomero, Kilosa, Mbarali and Kiteto Districts] PARAKUIYO PASTORALISTS INDIGENOUS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION-(PAICODEO) Funded By: IWGIA, Denmark i REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 Researchers Legal and Development Consultants Limited (LEDECO Advocates) Writer Adv. Clarence KIPOBOTA (Advocate of the High Court) Publisher Parakuiyo Pastoralists Indigenous Community Development Organization © PAICODEO March, 2013 ISBN: 978-9987-9726-1-6 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................... vii FOREWORD ........................................................................................................................viii Legal Status and Objectives of PAICODEO ...........................................................viii Vision ......................................................................................................................viii
    [Show full text]
  • CROP PROTECTION PROGRAMME Improving Farmers' Access to And
    CROP PROTECTION PROGRAMME Improving farmers’ access to and management of disease resistant cultivars in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania – Phase 2 R 8406 (ZA 0634) FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT 1 April 2005 – 31 January 2006 Nick G. Lyimo Uyole Agricultural Research Institute Date FTR completed: 24 February 2006 "This publication is an output from a research project funded by the United Kingdom Department for International Development for the benefit of developing countries. The views expressed are not necessarily those of DFID.” R8406: Improving farmers’ access to and management of disease resistant maize cultivars in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania. Crop Protection Programme. Acronyms and Abbreviations ADP Mbozi Agricultural Development Programme Mbozi Trust Fund AMSDP Agricultural Marketing Sector Development Programme ARI Agricultural Research Institute ASDP Agricultural Sector Development Programme ASPS Agricultural Sector Programme Support CPHP Crop Post Harvest Programme CPP Crop Protection Programme CSC Council Standing Committee DADS District Agricultural Development Strategy DAEO District Agricultural Extension Officer DALDO District Agricultural and Livestock Development Officer DC District Commissioner DE District Economist DED District Executive Director DFID Department for International Development DFT District Facilitation Team FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation FCM Full Council Meeting FFS Farmer Field School FIPS Farm Inputs Promoters GLS Grey Leaf Spot GTZ German Technical Cooperation HSG Highland Seed Growers IFAD
    [Show full text]