DOCSLIB.ORG

Resettlement Policy Framework (Rpf) for Proposed 340Km Mbeya –Tunduma–Sumbawanga 400Kv Transmission

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Resettlement Policy Framework (Rpf) for Proposed 340Km Mbeya –Tunduma–Sumbawanga 400Kv Transmission RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK (RPF) FOR PROPOSED 340KM MBEYA –TUNDUMA–SUMBAWANGA 400KV TRANSMISSION Public Disclosure Authorized LINE AND ~4KM TUNDUMA SUBSTATION TO TANZANIA-ZAMBIA BORDER 330KV TRANSMISSION LINE AND ASSOCIATED SUBSTATION AT TUNDUMA AND SUMBAWANGA Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized VOLUME I: MAIN RPF REPORT PROJECT PROPONENT: Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited (TANESCO), Umeme Park, Ubungo Area, P.O. Box 9024, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, Tel: +255 22 2451133, Fax: +255 22 2451149, E-mail: [email protected] Public Disclosure Authorized PREPARED BY: Ms. Elizabeth J. Aisu Individual Consultant, P.O. Box 20177 Kampala-Uganda Tel: +256 772 616 489, Fax: +255 22 2451149, E-mail: [email protected] 14th April, 2018 LIST OF EXPERTS The following experts were involved during preparation of this Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) for Mbeya-Tunduma-Sumbawanga 400kV Power TL and ~4km of segment of 330kV TL from Tunduma Substation to TanZam border as part of study team: S/N NAME EXPERTISE 1. Ms. Elizabeth Aisu RAP and RPF specialist –Team Leader 2. Ms. Vaileth Kimaro Sociologist 3. Mr. Fikirini M. Mtandika Environmentalist 4. Mr. Izaria Luvanda Land Surveyor 5. District Valuers, District Land Officers and All District where proposed TL traversed District Community Development Officers i TABLE OF CONTENTS List of experts ............................................................................................................................. i Table of contents ........................................................................................................................ ii List of tables .............................................................................................................................. vi List of figures ........................................................................................................................... vii List of acronyms .................................................................................................................... viii Definitions................................................................................................................................. ix Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. xi CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1 1.1 General Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Objective of the Resettlement Policy Framework ............................................................... 1 1.3 Methodology used to prepare the RPF................................................................................. 2 1.3.1 Literature reviews ............................................................................................................. 2 1.3.2 Consultations..................................................................................................................... 3 1.3.3 Checklist ........................................................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................. 4 2.1 Project Background .............................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Project location .................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Objectives of the policy on involuntary resettlement (OP 4.12) ......................................... 5 2.4 Guiding principles for resettlement of people displaced by the project .............................. 7 CHAPTER 3: LAND ACQUISITION AND LIKELY CATEGORIES OF IMPACTS ....... 10 3.1 Project Objective ................................................................................................................ 10 3.2 Project Components that May Require Resettlement ........................................................ 10 3.2.1 Transmission Line ........................................................................................................... 10 3.2.2 Substations ...................................................................................................................... 11 3.2.3 Access Roads .................................................................................................................. 12 3.3 Project Impacts................................................................................................................... 12 3.3.1 Types of Loss Due to Land Acquisition ......................................................................... 12 3.3.1.1 Loss of Assets or Access to Assets .............................................................................. 12 3.3.1.2 Land ............................................................................................................................. 13 3.3.1.3 House structures ........................................................................................................... 13 3.3.1.4 Agriculture ................................................................................................................... 13 3.3.1.5 Natural Assets: ............................................................................................................. 13 3.3.1.6 Public services and recreational grounds ..................................................................... 13 3.3.1.7 Loss of Rental Accommodation or Loss of Business Premises ................................... 13 3.3.1.8 Loss of Structures only (not land) ................................................................................ 13 3.3.1.9 Project Affected People (PAPs) ................................................................................... 13 CHAPTER: 4 SOCIO-ECONOMIC STUDIES .................................................................... 15 4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 15 4.2 Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 15 4.3 Area of influence................................................................................................................ 15 4.4 Administrative structure..................................................................................................... 15 4.5 Governance Structure ......................................................................................................... 18 4.6 Land ownership and land tenure ........................................................................................ 18 4.7 Land acquisition ................................................................................................................. 19 4.8 Land use ............................................................................................................................. 19 ii 4.8.1 Mbeya region – Land Area, Land Use Pattern and Administrative Units ...................... 20 4.8.2 Songwe region – Land Area, Land Use Pattern and Administrative Units .................... 20 4.8.3 Rukwa region – Land Area, Land Use Pattern and Administrative Units ...................... 21 4.9 Population .......................................................................................................................... 21 4.9.1 Existing population ......................................................................................................... 21 4.9.2 Population density and trend ........................................................................................... 25 4.9.3 Population migration ....................................................................................................... 29 4.10 Agricultural activities ....................................................................................................... 30 4.11 Livestock keeping ............................................................................................................ 31 4.12 Socio-economic factors .................................................................................................... 32 4.12.1 Occupation .................................................................................................................... 32 4.12.2 Education ...................................................................................................................... 32 4.12.3 Health ............................................................................................................................ 33 4.12.4 Gender issues ................................................................................................................ 34 4.12.4.1 Women employment status ........................................................................................ 34 4.12.4.2 Level of control over earnings ................................................................................... 34 4.12.4.3 Women level of participation in decision making ..................................................... 35 4.13 Burial Sites ....................................................................................................................... 35 CHAPTER 5: TANZANIA POLICY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK .................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Case of Mbozi District in Songwe Region
    Journal of Marketing and Consumer Research www.iiste.org ISSN 2422-8451 An International Peer-reviewed Journal Vol.24, 2016 Assessment of the Quality of coffee parchments in Southern Highlands of Tanzania: A case of Mbozi District in Songwe Region Muyengi, Zakaria 1 * Mariam Mtunguja 2Aziz Mtambo 3 Iddi Chamshama 4 Francis Ndunguru 5Tito Njowela 6 Alfonce Nanyanga 7Wilfred Kayombo 8 and Steven Kihwele 9 1&2. Agricultural Researchers, Mikocheni Agricultural Research Institute (MARI) of Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries (MALF). PO box 6226, Dar es Salaam. 3. Crop specialist, PO box 94, Mbozi, Tanzania,. 4. Cooperatives specialist, PO box 94, Mbozi, Tanzania,. 5. Crop specialist, PO box 94, Mbozi, Tanzania, 6. Crop specialist, PO box 94, Mbozi, Tanzania, E-mail:[email protected]. Land Use Planner, PO box 94, Mbozi, Tanzania. 8. Irrigation Agronomist, Region Commissioners Office, PO box 754, Mbeya, 9. Economist, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries (MALF). P.O. Box 9192, Dar es Salaam. Abstract It’s unfortunate that even a single defective of a coffee bean can contribute to affect the receptive-lot of coffee. Coffee parchments or beans with high quality fetches high price in the world market. The study aimed at assessing the quality of coffee parchments along the post-harvest stages. Main focus was on improvement of post-harvest practices for coffee quality of coffee from farm level and to the processing under supervision of primary societies. The study involved coffee farmers in 6 Agricultural Marketing and Cooperatives Societies (AMCOS). Questionnaire, check list tools and physical observation were used for data collection.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania Humanitarian Situation Report
    UNICEF Tanzania Situation Report July-August 2018 Tanzania Humanitarian Situation Report ia/2018/NRC ©UNICEF Tanzan ©UNICEF HIGHLIGHTS SITUATION IN NUMBERS • UNICEF supported the vaccination of over 5,500 under-5 refugee 298,201 children (966 Congolese; 4,576 Burundians) against polio and # of refugees and asylum seekers, measles. Burundians and Congolese, in three camps • Between July and August 2018, 7,541 unaccompanied and separated (UNHCR, 31 July 2018) children have received child protection assistance from Plan International and the International Rescue Committee (IRC) through 160,931 (54 per cent) UNICEF support. # of refugee children requiring humanitarian • A high-level visit of the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) Assistant High assistance Commissioner for Protection took place in August focusing on voluntary repatriation and maintaining asylum space in Tanzania. 59,604 (20 per cent) # of under 5 children living in the three UNICEF’s Response with Partners refugee camps Burundian Congolese 44,075 Total Refugees Refugees Total target results # of refugees voluntarily returned to Burundi Burundians UNICEF UNICEF Burundians of the 74,561 registered as of 17 August Results Results and 2018 2018 and 2018 to date* to Date Congolese Target Target Congolese WASH: Refugees and host community members 131,250 162,619 54,103 41,204 185,353 203,823 provided with safe water per agreed standards Education: School-aged children including 95,000 59,092* 36,290 52,140 131,290 111,232 adolescents accessing quality education Health: Child under five years vaccinated against 32,000 18,363 3,500 4,300 35,500 22,663 measles and polio Nutrition: Children under 5 years with severe acute malnutrition (SAM) 2,104 1,154 459 259 2,563 1,413 admitted to therapeutic services Nutrition: Children under 5 provided with micronutrient 53,439 41,536 13,959 12,979 67,398 54,515 supplementation Child Protection: 100% of Cumulative results from January to August 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights and Business Report 2015
    LEGALLEGAL AND AND HUMAN HUMAN RIGHTS RIGHTS CENTRE CENTRE HUMANHUMAN RIGHTS RIGHTS AND AND BUSINESS BUSINESS REPORT REPORT OF 2015 2015 Taking Stock of Labour Rights, Land Rights, Gender, Taxation, Corporate Accountability,Taking Stock Environmental of Labour Justice Rights, and Performance Land Rights, of Regulatory Gender, Authorities Taxation, Corporate Accountability, Environmental Justice and Performance of Regulatory Authorities LEGAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS CENTRE HUMAN RIGHTS AND BUSINESS REPORT 2015 PUBLISHER Legal and Human Rights Centre Justice Lugakingira House, Kijitonyama P.O Box 75254, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Tel.: +255222773038/48 Fax: +255222773037 Email: [email protected] Website: www.humanrights.or.tz PARTNERS ISBN:978-9987-740-26-0 © July, 2016 ii ii EDITORIAL BOARD Dr. Helen Kijo-Bisimba, Adv. Imelda Lulu Urrio Adv. Anna Henga Ms. Felista Mauya Mr. Castor Kalemera RESEARCH COORDINATOR Adv. Masud George ASSISTANT RESEARCHERS 29 Assistant Researchers 14 Field Enumerators REPORT WRITER Adv. Clarence Kipobota LAYOUT & DESIGN Mr. Rodrick Maro Important Message of the Year 2015 LHRC endorses the United Nations’ call to all nations (and everyone) to promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, with full and productive employment and decent work for all as it is implied under Goal 8 of the United Nations Strategic Development Goals (SDGs) 2030. iii iii DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed by the sampled respondents in this report do not necessarily reflect the official position of the Legal and Human Rights Centre (LHRC). Therefore, no mention of any authority, organization, company or individual shall imply any approval as to official standing of the matters which have implicated them. The illustrations used by inferring some of the respondents are for guiding the said analysis and discussion only, and not constitute the conclusive opinion on part of LHRC.
    [Show full text]
  • Feed the Future Tanzania Mboga Na Matunda
    FEED THE FUTURE TANZANIA MBOGA NA MATUNDA Quarterly Report # 5 April 1 - June 30, 2018 Feed the Future Tanzania Mboga na Matunda | Quarterly Report #5 Fintrac Inc. www.fintrac.com [email protected] US Virgin Islands 3077 Kronprindsens Gade 72 St. Thomas, USVI 00802 Tel: (340) 776-7600 Fax: (340) 776-7601 Washington, DC 1400 16th Street NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20036 USA Tel: (202) 462-8475 Fax: (202) 462-8478 Feed the Future Mboga na Matunda (FTFT-MnM) P.O Box 13121, Plot No. 37 Mlandege Street | Mikocheni B Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Cover photo: Members of the Mahoho and Kilimo Kwanza farmer groups in Mbarali, Mbeya showcasing their harvested tomato. All photos by Fintrac Inc. Prepared by Fintrac Inc. Feed the Future Tanzania Horticulture Mboga na Matunda | Quarterly Report #5 CONTENTS ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................................ i 1. ACTIVITY OVERVIEW/SUMMARY ........................................................................... 1 1.1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Summary of Results for this Quarter ........................................................................... 2 1.3 Evaluation/Assessment Status and/or Plans................................................................. 9 2. ACTIVITY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS ....................................................... 10 2.1 Progress Narrative ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The RICE Value Chain in Tanzania
    THE RICE VALUE CHAIN IN TANZANIA A report from the Southern Highlands Food Systems Programme R. Trevor Wilson I. Lewis This background paper is made available without further edits to the version presented by its authors. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. © FAO, 2015 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-request or addressed to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Ileje SP FULL
    PREFACE Ileje District Council has a vital role of ensuring that effective coordination and supervision of service delivery Targets is in place so that stakeholders deliver quality services to the community and practice good governance in the development of the District. In order to achieve the above Strategic Objective, Ileje District Council through its Departments will strengthen its cooperation with all stakeholders through the existing government machinery. It will make sure that the policies are properly translated and implemented by her stakeholders in order to achieve sustainable development. The Medium Term Strategic Plan (MTSP) for the Ileje District Council (IDC) 2017/2018 - 2020/2021 is aimed at building the capacity of the Council and its stakeholders towards promoting economic growth with consequent poverty reduction among the local communities, with due emphasis. Ileje District Council will ensure that the set key result areas, strategic objectives and strategies are effectively implemented and monitored. Stakeholder shall be called upon to cooperate in the implementation of the District’s Strategic Plan. Therefore Government, Development Partners and Community are urged to give their maximum contribution and support according to their commitments in order to facilitate execution of the Council Medium Term Strategic Plan. Success in implementing the service delivery targets and strategic objectives of Ileje District Council will contribute greatly to the overall success in the achievement of National goals by improving its economy and reduce poverty among the population. ___________________ Ubatizo J. Songa DISTRICT CHAIRERSON, ILEJE. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This Strategic Plan for 2017/2018 – 2020/2021 has been prepared in collaboration with a number of individuals and institutions including District and Ward political leaders, Council staff, Ward Executive Officers and Extension Staff, representatives from Public Institutions, Business Community and the Media.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the State of Pastoralists' Human Rights in Tanzania
    REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ HUMAN RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 [Area Surveyed: Handeni, Kilindi, Bagamoyo, Kibaha, Iringa-Rural, Morogoro, Mvomero, Kilosa, Mbarali and Kiteto Districts] Cover Picture: Maasai warriors dancing at the initiation ceremony of Mr. Kipulelia Kadege’s children in Handeni District, Tanga Region, April 2006. PAICODEO Tanzania Funded By: IWGIA, Denmark 1 REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ HUMAN RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 [Area Surveyed: Handeni, Kilindi, Bagamoyo, Kibaha, Iringa-Rural, Morogoro-Rural, Mvomero, Kilosa, Mbarali and Kiteto Districts] PARAKUIYO PASTORALISTS INDIGENOUS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION-(PAICODEO) Funded By: IWGIA, Denmark i REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 Researchers Legal and Development Consultants Limited (LEDECO Advocates) Writer Adv. Clarence KIPOBOTA (Advocate of the High Court) Publisher Parakuiyo Pastoralists Indigenous Community Development Organization © PAICODEO March, 2013 ISBN: 978-9987-9726-1-6 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................... vii FOREWORD ........................................................................................................................viii Legal Status and Objectives of PAICODEO ...........................................................viii Vision ......................................................................................................................viii
    [Show full text]
  • The United Republic of Tanzania
    The United Republic of Tanzania Tanzania Investment Centre Investment Opportunities in the Oil Palm Value Chain, Tanzania Contents Contents ......................................................................................................................................................................... ii Table of Figures ............................................................................................................................................................ iv List of Tables .................................................................................................................................................................. v 1 Overview of the Oil Palm Producing Regions in Tanzania ............................................................................ 1 1.1 Data Collection .............................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Edible Oils: The Untapped Sub-sector in Tanzania ......................................................................................... 2 3 Oil Palm Production ................................................................................................................................................ 4 3.1 Oil Palm Production in Tanzania ................................................................................................................ 4 3.1.1 Historical and Current Global Production of Palm Oil ................................................................ 5
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeology of Mbeya Region, Southwestern Tanzania
    128 Notes Azania XI Archaeological survey in Mbeya Region, Southern Tanzania I" Azania XVII we included a paper by Thomas Wynn and Thomas Chadderdon on the distinctive LSA Kiwira Industry in Tukuyu District, between RunJ!We Mountain and the northern tip of Lake Nyasa . Tl1e present note place$ that work in the context of a broader survey in that reJ!ion by a team from the University of Illinois at Urbana . Sally McBrearty is complttinJ! her thesis at Urbana, Dr Waane is with the·Tanzanian An­ tiquities, while Dr Wynn is on faculty at the University of Colorado. While this volume of A-zania was in press, we discovered that, as a result of some unexplained com­ munication problem, another version of this paper had appeared in Tanzania Notes and Records, 88/89 {for 1982), pp, 15-32 , At this late staJ!e and in view of various editorial amendments and reduction aJ!reed with the authors when the note was offered to Azania and accepted in JIOOd faith, we have decided not to delete it from our proofs. We are happy to have the aJ!ret~ment of the editors ofTNR to this. Normally, however, we would not carry an article or note already published or accepted elsewhere. The TNR version will be valuable to a number of readers for its illustration of stone artefacts. In 1976 we undertook an archaeological survey of portions of lleje, Kyela, Mbeya, Mbozi and Tukuyu Districts of Mbeya Region in southern Tanzania. As no formal archaeological reconnaissance of the region had previously been undertaken, our intention was to establish the general outlines of prehistoric occupation of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • GN. LAND RENTS REVIEW 2012.Pdf
    LAND RENT RATES (Made Under Regulation 2(3)) ARUSHA REGION ARUSHA CITY COUNCIL S/N ZONE AREA USER OLD RATES PER NEW RATES PER M2 M2 1 CBD Commercial Atrea "E",Commercial Residential 100.00 300.00 Area Blocks A - S, Block 21 along Commercial/Residential 150.00 600.00 Conal Midletron Road Commercial/Service Trade/restraurant 300.00 1,500.00 2 Next to CBD Residential Area I and II Corridor Area, Residential 40.00 120.00 Sekei,East of Golf Course, Kijenge South, Hotel 77, Olorien (Block KK), Blocks F, HH and W Themi and Uzungunig Commercial/Residential 60.00 240.00 Commercial/Service Trade/restraurant 120.00 600.00 3 Outside CBDThe Stretch from Nduruma river to Residential 40.00 120.00 Sakina (200 meters zone) Commercial/Residential 60.00 240.00 Commercial/Service Trade/restraurant 120.00 600.00 4 Outside CBDThe whole area of Kaloleni, Levolosi Residential 40.00 120.00 and Block 21 Commercial/Residential 60.00 240.00 Commercial/Service Trade/restraurant 120.00 600.00 5 Outside CBD The whole area of Blocks A - C Njiro Residential 40.00 120.00 Commercial/Residential 60.00 240.00 Commercial/Service Trade/restraurant 120.00 600.00 1 6 Outside CBD Kijenge, Mashono, Kimandolu, Residential 25.00 75.00 Kwangulelo, Olorien (Block KK) Commercial/Residential 37.50 150.00 Commercial/Service Trade/restraurant 75.00 375.00 7 Outside CBD The whole area of Unga limited, Esso, Residential 25.00 75.00 Commercial/Residential 37.50 150.00 Commercial/Service Trade/restraurant 75.00 375.00 8 Outside CBD The whole area of Ngarenaro, Block Residential 15.00 45.00
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Bringing Nutrition to Scale Project in Iringa, Mbeya and Njombe
    Evaluation of the Bringing Nutrition to Scale Project in Iringa, Mbeya and Njombe Regions (2013–2017) Evaluation Report 23 April 2018 Prepared by Stephen Turner (Team Leader) Bjorn Ljungqvist Joyce Kinabo Jim Grabham Proposal contacts: Evaluation of Bringing Nutrition to Scale in Iringa, Mbeya and Njombe ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND DISCLAIMER The evaluation team are grateful to the nutrition colleagues at the UNICEF Country Office in Dar es Salaam and the Sub-office in Mbeya for all their support in providing information and facilitating meetings throughout this assignment. Quality support for the evaluation has been provided by the QS team assigned to the evaluation: Stephen Anderson (Food Economy Group) and Stephen Lister (Mokoro Ltd). The authors take full responsibility for the contents of this report. The designations employed, maps and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNICEF concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delineation of its frontiers or boundaries. ii Evaluation of Bringing Nutrition to Scale in Iringa, Mbeya and Njombe Contents Summary v 1. Introduction __________________________________________________ 1 1.1. Evaluation purpose and scope ___________________________________ 1 1.2. Country context ______________________________________________ 1 1.3. Nutrition in Tanzania and the project area __________________________ 2 2. The BNTS and ASRP projects _____________________________________ 5 2.1. Project description ____________________________________________ 5 2.2. Key stakeholders and linkages ___________________________________ 8 2.3. Summary of reported performance ______________________________ 10 3. Approach and methods _________________________________________ 11 3.1. Evaluation approach __________________________________________ 11 3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Using the Theory of Planned Behavior to Explain Birth in Health Facility
    Moshi et al. Reproductive Health (2020) 17:2 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-0851-1 RESEARCH Open Access Using the theory of planned behavior to explain birth in health facility intention among expecting couples in a rural setting Rukwa Tanzania: a cross-sectional survey Fabiola V. Moshi1* , Stephen M. Kibusi2 and Flora Fabian3 Abstract Background: According to the theory of planned behavior, an intention to carry out a certain behavior facilitates action. In the context of birth in health facility, the intention to use health facilities for childbirth may better ensure better maternal and neonatal survival. Little is known on the influence of the domains of theory of planned behavior on birth in health facility intention. The study aimed to determine the influence of the domains of theory of planned behavior on birth in health facility intention among expecting couples in the rural Southern Highlands of Tanzania. Methods: A community based cross-sectional study targeting pregnant women and their partners was performed from June until October 2017. A three-stage probability sampling technique was employed to obtain a sample of 546 couples (making a total of 1092 study participants). A structured questionnaire based upon the Theory of Planned Behavior was used. The questionnaire explored three main domains of birth in health facility intentions. These three domains included; 1) attitudes towards maternal services utilization, 2) perceived subjective norms towards maternal services utilization and 3) perceived behavior control towards maternal services utilization. Results: The vast majority of study participants had birth in health facility intention. This included 499(91.2%) of pregnant women and 488(89.7%%) of their male partners partner.
    [Show full text]