DOCSLIB.ORG

Data Communications Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Data Communications Plan Ocean Systems Test and Evaluation Program Data Communications Plan May 2006 noaa National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Ocean Service Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services National Ocean Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.S. Department of Commerce The Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services (CO-OPS) mission is to deliver the operational environmental products and services necessary to support the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA’s) environmental stewardship and environmental assessment and prediction missions. CO-OPS provides the focus for operationally-sound observation and monitoring capability, coupled with environmental predictions to provide the quality data and information needed to support the National Ocean Service (NOS) primary goals of navigation, coastal communities, habitat, and coastal hazards. Ocean Systems Test & Evaluation Program The CO-OPS Ocean Systems Test and Evaluation Program (OSTEP) facilitates the transition of new technology to an operational status, selecting newly- developed sensors or systems from the research and development community and bringing them to a monitoring setting. OSTEP provides quantifiable and defensible justifications for the use of existing sensors and methods for selecting new systems. The program establishes and maintains field reference facilities where, in cooperation with other agencies facing similar challenges, devices are examined in a non- operational field setting. OSTEP evaluates sensors, develops quality control procedures, and generates maintenance routines. Rigorous, traceable calibrations and redundant sensors assure the quality of the reference systems used in the field. The program receives guidance from the Ocean Systems Test & Evaluation Advisory Board. OSTEP Advisory Board Mark Bushnell, NOAA/NOS/CO-OPS Karen Earwaker, NOAA/NOS/CO-OPS Geoff French, NOAA/NOS/CO-OPS Ann Gargett, ODU/CCPO Warren Krug, NOAA/NOS/CO-OPS W. Douglas Wilson, NOAA/CBO William Burnett, NOAA/NDBC Ocean Systems Test and Evaluation Program Data Communications Plan Tammy Graff James Sprenke Mark Bushnell May 2006 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary Vice Admiral Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr., U.S. Navy (Ret.) National Ocean Service John H. Dunnigan, Assistant Administrator Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services Michael Szabados, Director NOTICE Mention of a commercial company or product does not constitute an endorsement by NOAA. Use for publicity or advertising purposes of information from this publication concerning proprietary products or the results of the tests of such products is not authorized. ii iii iv TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................. VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................... VII 1.0 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................... - 1 - 1.1 PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT ........................................................................................... - 1 - 1.2 BACKGROUND............................................................................................................. - 1 - 1.3 ORGANIZATION OF THIS DOCUMENT........................................................................... - 3 - 2.0 CURRENT AND FUTURE GOES CAPABILITIES.............................................. - 5 - 2.1 GOES. ........................................................................................................................ - 5 - 2.2 NEW GOES CAPABILITIES AND GOES-R................................................................... - 7 - 2.3 DOMSAT................................................................................................................... - 8 - 3.0 CURRENT LAND BASED COMMUNICATION CAPABILITIES..................... - 9 - 3.1 TELEPHONE LINES ...................................................................................................... - 9 - 3.2 LINE-OF-SIGHT RADIOS .............................................................................................. - 9 - 3.3 INTERNET PROTOCOL (IP) MODEMS ........................................................................... - 10 - 4.0 CURRENT AND FUTURE SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS .................................... - 13 - 4.1 RELIABLE REAL-TIME DATA (EVERY SIX MINUTES) ................................................... - 13 - 4.2 COMPANY/SYSTEM STABILITY ................................................................................... - 13 - 4.3 ACCEPTABLE COST ..................................................................................................... - 14 - 4.4 ABILITY TO EXPAND USAGE ........................................................................................ - 14 - 4.5 SYSTEM VERSATILITY................................................................................................. - 14 - 4.6 TWO-WAY COMMUNICATION CAPABILITY................................................................... - 15 - 5.0 NEXT GENERATION OF DATA COMMUNICATION POSSIBILITIES ........ - 17 - 5.1 INMARSAT................................................................................................................... - 18 - 5.2 IRIDIUM SATELLITE, LLC ........................................................................................... - 22 - 5.3 ORBCOMM............................................................................................................... - 27 - 5.4 GLOBALSTAR.............................................................................................................. - 29 - 5.5 ARGOS...................................................................................................................... - 31 - 5.6 SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH ................................................................. - 33 - 5.6.1 Cellular Coastal Network................................................................................. - 33 - 5.6.2 Data Collection Platform Interrogation (DCPI) Link ...................................... - 33 - 6.0 CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................................... - 35 - 6.1 CONCERNS .................................................................................................................. - 35 - 6.2 RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................................... - 35 - 6.3 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... - 34 - 7.0 ACRONYMS............................................................................................................... - 41 - ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................................................................... - 43 - APPENDICES ....................................................................................................................... - 45 - v LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. GOES Satellite..................................................................................................... - 5 - Figure 2. GOES Coverage Area.......................................................................................... - 6 - Figure 3. GOES IDs ............................................................................................................ - 7 - Figure 4. Inmarsat Coverage Area ...................................................................................... - 19 - Figure 5. Short Burst Data................................................................................................... - 22 - Figure 6. Iridium Crosslinks................................................................................................ - 25 - Figure 7. ORMCOMM Gateway......................................................................................... - 27 - Figure 8. Globalstar Coverage Map .................................................................................... - 29 - LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Inmarsat Advantages/Disadvantages ................................................................... - 21 - Table 2. Iridium Advantages/Disadvantages ..................................................................... - 26 - Table 3. ORBCOMM Advantages/Disadvantages ............................................................ - 28 - Table 4 Globalstar Advantages/Disadvantages................................................................. - 30 - Table 5. ARGOS Advantages/Disadvantages.................................................................... - 32 - Table 6. 30-Day/Monthly Costs for Transmitting Data..................................................... - 38 - Table 7. Comparison of Advantages/Disadvantages ......................................................... - 39 - vi Executive Summary The Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services (CO-OPS) supports the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Ocean Service (NOS) strategic goals by providing high-quality data products and services. The raw data used for our products are obtained through the placement of measurement
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2014 Annual Report
    Iridium Communications Inc. 2014 Annual Report Iridium NEXT RELIABLE • CRITICAL • LIFELINES® Company Profile The world’s only truly global mobile satellite communications company Iridium Communications Inc. owns the only mobile voice and data satellite communications network that spans the entire globe. A technology innovator and market leader, Iridium enables connections between people, organizations and assets to and from anywhere, in real time. Iridium’s 66 low-Earth orbiting (LEO) cross-linked satellites – the world's largest commercial constellation – operate as a fully meshed network. The company has a major development program underway for its next-generation network – Iridium NEXT. Reaching over oceans, through airways and across the polar regions, Iridium® solutions are ideally suited for industries such as maritime, aviation, emergency services, mining, forestry, oil and gas, heavy equipment, transportation and utilities. Iridium also provides service to subscribers from the U.S. Department of Defense, as well as other civil and government agencies around the world. Together with its ecosystem of partner companies, Iridium delivers an innovative and rich portfolio of reliable solutions for markets that require truly global communications. Who is Iridium? 2014 Operating Highlights • We compete in attractive and growing markets with favorable • Generated 2014 Net Income of $75 million, a 20% competitive dynamics and high barriers to entry. year-over-year increase. Delivered Operational EBITDA (OEBITDA)* of $217 million, resulting in We operate the world’s furthest reaching telecommunications • a five-year compound annual growth rate of 8%. network with 100% global coverage. Our unique network architecture provides a sustainable competitive advantage. • Surpassed 739,000 worldwide subscribers, a We have a comprehensive business plan for our next-generation five-year compound annual growth rate of 15%.
    [Show full text]
  • ODQN 10-1.Indd
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Orbital Debris Quarterly News Volume 10, Issue 1 January 2006 Collision Avoidance Maneuver Performed by NASA’s Terra Spacecraft Inside... The Terra spacecraft, often referred to as the ignator 1983-063C, U.S. Satellite Number 14222) fl agship of NASA’s Earth Observing System (EOS), would come within 500 m of Terra on 23 October, successfully performed a small collision avoidance GSFC and SSN personnel undertook a more de- Large Area Debris maneuver on 21 October 2005 to ensure safe passage tailed assessment of the coming conjunction. Collector (LAD-C) by a piece of orbital debris two days later. This ac- The Scout debris was in an orbit with an alti- Update ........................2 tion demonstrated the effectiveness of a conjunction tude similar to that of Terra (approximately assessment procedure implemented in 2004 680 km by 710 km), but its posigrade Revision of Space by personnel of the NASA Goddard inclination of 82.4° and different orbit Shuttle Wing Leading Space Flight Center (GSFC) and the plane meant that a collision would have Edge Reinforced U.S. Space Surveillance Network occurred at a high velocity of near- (SSN). The trajectories of Terra ly 12 km/s. By 21 October Carbon-Carbon Failure and its companion EOS space- refi ned analysis of the Criteria Based on craft are frequently com- future close approach Hypervelocity Impact pared with the orbits of indicated that the miss and Arc-Jet Testing ...3 thousands of objects distance was only ap- tracked by the SSN proximately 50 m with Object Reentry to determine if an an uncertainty that Survivability Analysis accidental collision yielded a probability Tool (ORSAT) – is possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Business Review International Mobile Telecommunications Services, Including Wimax
    December 2007 - SPECIAL EDITION: THE TOP-10 SPACE BUSINESS STORIES OF 2007 - #1 - M&A Transactions Keep Pace #5 - 50th Anniversary of Sputnik Despite challenging credit markets, merger, As we celebrate the 50th anniversary of the acquisition and investment activity kept pace in satellite that introduced the “space age”, 2007. Abertis & Caisse des Dépôts et approximately 1,000 satellites now orbit the consignations purchase 32% (€1.07B) and Earth and the space business has grown to 25.5% (€862.7M) stakes, respectively, in more than $100 billion in annual revenues. Eutelsat (Jan.). GE Capital sells back its 19.5% #6 - Satellite Manufacturers Remain Busy interest in SES Global for €588 million in cash 18 commercial satellite orders announced in and assets including stakes in AsiaSat, Star 2007. Ball Aerospace & Technologies: One and Orbcomm (Feb.). JSAT & SKY WorldView-2. EADS Astrium: YahSat 1A Perfect Communications merge (March). BC and 1B, Arabsat 5A, BADR-5 (the foregoing Partners to acquire Intelsat Ltd. for $16.4 billion, in cooperation with Thales Alenia Space) including debt (June). Carlyle Group to acquire and Alphasat 1-XL. Israel Aerospace ARINC (July). Apax Partners France Industries: Amos-4. Lockheed Martin purchases Telenor Satellite Services for $400 Commercial Space Systems: JCSAT-12. million (Sept.). Loral Space & Orbital Sciences Corporation: Optus-D3, Communications and PSP Canada conclude AMC-5R. Space Systems/Loral: Nimiq 5, C$3.25 billion acquisition of Telesat Canada ProtoStar I, Intelsat 14, SIRIUS FM-6, Abertis to acquire 28.4% stake in Hispasat EchoStar XIV, NSS-12. Thales Alenia (Nov.). CIP Canada Investment, indirectly Space: THOR 6, Palapa-D.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS) Handbook 2018 I CONTENTS
    FOREWORD This handbook has been produced by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA), and is intended for use on ships that are: • compulsorily equipped with GMDSS radiocommunication installations in accordance with the requirements of the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea Convention 1974 (SOLAS) and Commonwealth or State government marine legislation • voluntarily equipped with GMDSS radiocommunication installations. It is the recommended textbook for candidates wishing to qualify for the Australian GMDSS General Operator’s Certificate of Proficiency. This handbook replaces the tenth edition of the GMDSS Handbook published in September 2013, and has been amended to reflect: • changes to regulations adopted by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) World Radiocommunications Conference (2015) • changes to Inmarsat services • an updated AMSA distress beacon registration form • changes to various ITU Recommendations • changes to the publications published by the ITU • developments in Man Overboard (MOB) devices • clarification of GMDSS radio log procedures • general editorial updating and improvements. Procedures outlined in the handbook are based on the ITU Radio Regulations, on radio procedures used by Australian Maritime Communications Stations and Satellite Earth Stations in the Inmarsat network. Careful observance of the procedures covered by this handbook is essential for the efficient exchange of communications in the marine radiocommunication service, particularly where safety of life at sea is concerned. Special attention should be given to those sections dealing with distress, urgency, and safety. Operators of radiocommunications equipment on vessels not equipped with GMDSS installations should refer to the Marine Radio Operators Handbook published by the Australian Maritime College, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia. No provision of this handbook or the ITU Radio Regulations prevents the use, by a ship in distress, of any means at its disposal to attract attention, make known its position and obtain help.
    [Show full text]
  • Spectrum and the Technological Transformation of the Satellite Industry Prepared by Strand Consulting on Behalf of the Satellite Industry Association1
    Spectrum & the Technological Transformation of the Satellite Industry Spectrum and the Technological Transformation of the Satellite Industry Prepared by Strand Consulting on behalf of the Satellite Industry Association1 1 AT&T, a member of SIA, does not necessarily endorse all conclusions of this study. Page 1 of 75 Spectrum & the Technological Transformation of the Satellite Industry 1. Table of Contents 1. Table of Contents ................................................................................................ 1 2. Executive Summary ............................................................................................. 4 2.1. What the satellite industry does for the U.S. today ............................................... 4 2.2. What the satellite industry offers going forward ................................................... 4 2.3. Innovation in the satellite industry ........................................................................ 5 3. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 7 3.1. Overview .................................................................................................................. 7 3.2. Spectrum Basics ...................................................................................................... 8 3.3. Satellite Industry Segments .................................................................................... 9 3.3.1. Satellite Communications ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC NOTICE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 445 12Th STREET S.W
    PUBLIC NOTICE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 445 12th STREET S.W. WASHINGTON D.C. 20554 News media information 202-418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov (or ftp.fcc.gov) TTY (202) 418-2555 Report No. SES-01927 Wednesday February 8, 2017 Satellite Communications Services Information re: Actions Taken The Commission, by its International Bureau, took the following actions pursuant to delegated authority. The effective dates of the actions are the dates specified. SES-LIC-20161223-00969 E E160180 ACC Licensee, LLC EZ Application for Authority 01/31/2017 - 01/31/2032 Grant of Authority Date Effective: 01/31/2017 Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Nature of Service: Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 LOCATION: Transportable ANTENNA ID: 1 1.4 meters AVL Technologies 1410K 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G7W 65.47 dBW Compressed Digital Video and Audio Points of Communication: 1 - PERMITTED LIST - () SES-MOD-20161216-00949 E E040399 WLS Television, Inc. Application for Modification 11/30/2004 - 11/30/2019 Grant of Authority Date Effective: 02/01/2017 Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Nature of Service: Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 LOCATION: GREATER CHICAGO METRO AREA AND MIDWESTERN USA, VARIOUS ANTENNA ID: 1 1.5 meters ADVENT COMMUNICATIONS NEWS SWIFT 150 KMA Page 1 of 5 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G7W 66.30 dBW PSK DIGITAL VIDEO, AUDIO, VOICE AND DATA ANTENNA ID: 2CHICAGO 1.4 meters AVL TECHNOLOGIES 1410 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G7W 65.00 dBW SINGLE CARRIER DVB S/S2 DIGITAL VIDEO, PROGRAM AUDIO,, VOICE AND DATA. Points of Communication: 1 - PERMITTED LIST - () SES-RWL-20170131-00110 E E020099 Vyve Broadband A Renewal 04/04/2017 - 04/04/2032 Grant of Authority Date Effective: 02/02/2017 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Nature of Service: Domestic Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 LOCATION: 19670 302ND ROAD, ATCHISON, ATCHISON, KS 39 ° 35 ' 44.90 " N LAT.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission FCC 16-181 Before
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 16-181 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Terrestrial Use of the 2473-2495 MHz Band for ) IB Docket No. 13-213 Low-Power Mobile Broadband Networks; ) RM-11685 Amendments to Rules for the Ancillary Terrestrial ) Component of Mobile Satellite Service Systems ) REPORT AND ORDER Adopted: December 22, 2016 Released: December 23, 2016 By the Commission: Commissioners Pai and O’Rielly issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1 II. BACKGROUND.................................................................................................................................... 4 A. The Big LEO Bands and Ancillary Terrestrial Component Rules................................................... 4 B. Globalstar’s Petition for Rulemaking .............................................................................................. 5 C. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ...................................................................................................... 6 III. DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................................................ 7 A. Part 25 Revisions ............................................................................................................................. 7 1. Allowing greater terrestrial
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Analysis of Inmarsat and Iridium Aeronautical Services in the Same Oceanic Airspace
    E.F.C.LaBerge Senior Fellow, Honeywell CNS RTC June 18, 2008 [email protected] Updated Analysis of Inmarsat and Iridium Aeronautical Services in the Same Oceanic Airspace. 1 IEEE/AIAA 26th DASC, October 2007, Paper 213 EFC LaBerge & D. Zeng Purpose and Scope of the Analysis • Investigate Iridium AMSS/AMS(R)S and Inmarsat AMSS/AMS(R)S on separate aircraft in the same oceanic airspace • Analysis is limited to Oceanic Airspace structured following DO-306 guidelines, since FANS-1/A datalink Air Traffic Service (ATS) has widespread approval for operations in oceanic airspace • Conclusions are not applicable to other operational scenarios or airspace, including: - Polar, continental enroute, terminal, approach, and airport surface airspace as defined in Eurocontrol/FAA COCR document; - Simultaneous independent operation of Iridium and Inmarsat AESes on the same aircraft; and - All non-aeronautical terminals and non-aeronautical services 2 Released to ICAO ACP WGM June 18, 2008 Conclusions • The probability of Inmarsat AMSS/AMS(R)S causing a service interruption that would affect the availability of Iridium AMSS/AMS(R)S operating on separate aircraft in oceanic airspace is very small • In oceanic airspace, Inmarsat AMSS/AMS(R)S out of band emissions from one aircraft do not cause harmful interference to Iridium AMSS/AMS(R)S on another aircraft: - The functioning of Iridium AMSS/AMS(R)S is not endangered; - No serious degradation, obstruction or repeated interruption of the operation of Iridium AMSS/AMS(R)S 3 Released to ICAO ACP WGM June 18, 2008 Full disclosure, etc. • This work was based on the volumetric interference approach briefed to AMCP WGA in 1998-2000… • …and supported by Iridium, LLC (the old Iridium).
    [Show full text]
  • IAC-18-B2.1.7 Page 1 of 16 a Technical Comparison of Three
    A Technical Comparison of Three Low Earth Orbit Satellite Constellation Systems to Provide Global Broadband Inigo del Portilloa,*, Bruce G. Cameronb, Edward F. Crawleyc a Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge 02139, USA, [email protected] b Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge 02139, USA, [email protected] c Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge 02139, USA, [email protected] * Corresponding Author Abstract The idea of providing Internet access from space has made a strong comeback in recent years. After a relatively quiet period following the setbacks suffered by the projects proposed in the 90’s, a new wave of proposals for large constellations of low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites to provide global broadband access emerged between 2014 and 2016. Compared to their predecessors, the main differences of these systems are: increased performance that results from the use of digital communication payloads, advanced modulation schemes, multi-beam antennas, and more sophisticated frequency reuse schemes, as well as the cost reductions from advanced manufacturing processes (such as assembly line, highly automated, and continuous testing) and reduced launch costs. This paper compares three such large LEO satellite constellations, namely SpaceX’s 4,425 satellites Ku-Ka-band system, OneWeb’s 720 satellites Ku-Ka-band system, and Telesat’s 117 satellites Ka-band system. First, we present the system architecture of each of the constellations (as described in their respective FCC filings as of September 2018), highlighting the similarities and differences amongst the three systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Iot the Next Industrial Satellite Communication Revolution?
    WHITEPAPER: IS IOT THE NEXT INDUSTRIAL SATELLITE COMMUNICATION REVOLUTION? By Oscar Glottmann, Spacebridge Inc. The Internet of Things (IoT) and associated expected to grow 23 percent annually, and MachineTo-Machine (M2M) connectivity of the 28 billion total devices that will be has been named the next Industrial connected by 2021, close to 16 billion will be Revolution, as it will bring major changes in IoT devices. the way all businesses, governments, and people will interact with each other, as well Other notable forecasts summed up as with the entire world. In this article, we will by Forbes(*2) on November 2016 are explore if IoT/M2M will also bring about the McKinsey’s estimates that the total IoT next Industrial Satellite Communications market size in 2015 was up to $900M, (SATCOM) Revolution. Forecasts for growth growing to $3.7B in 2020 attaining a 32.6% and expected number of IoT/M2M devices CAGR, the General Electric prediction are staggering. Just to take one example, that the Industrial Internet of Things (IoT) Ericsson Mobility Report(*1) beginning investment is expected to top $60 trillion of 2016 predicts IoT will overtake mobile during the next 15 years, and the IHS phones by 2018, and predicts that between forecast predicting that the IoT market will 2015 and 2021 the number of IoT/M2M grow from an installed base of 15.4 billion connected devices will grow 23 percent devices in 2015 to 30.7 billion devices in annually. Furthermore, Ericsson predicts 2020 and 75.4 billion in 2025. the number of IoT connected devices is Predictions are predictions, but one thing is for certain, IoT is going to be big.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Internet 3 User Manual for the Windows Operating Systems
    DIRECT INTERNET 3 User Manual for the Mac OS® Operating System Iridium Communications Inc. Rev. 2; October 29, 2010 Table of Contents 1 OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................1 2 HOW IT WORKS ....................................................................................................................................1 3 THE DIAL-UP CONNECTION ...............................................................................................................2 3.1 Connect ..........................................................................................................................................2 3.2 Disconnect .....................................................................................................................................5 4 DIRECT INTERNET 3 WEB ACCELERATOR ......................................................................................6 4.1 Launch ...........................................................................................................................................6 4.2 The User Interface Menu ...............................................................................................................7 4.3 Start and Stop ................................................................................................................................8 4.4 Statistics .........................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Associate Member Profiles GVF Directory & Satellite Resource
    Associate Member Profiles Name: ABS The company's expertise in the areas of government relations Address: O Hara House, 3 Bermudiana Road, and regulatory affairs means it is able to provide clients with a Hamilton, HM08, Bermuda. range of solutions that create the commercial environment they Tel: +1 441 295 7149 need to flourish. Email: [email protected] Internet: www.absatellite.com Contact: Raymond Chow Job Title: Deputy COO ABS is a young and fast growing global satellite operator, with an entrepreneurial and creative business approach. Headquartered in Bermuda, ABS has offices in the United States, UAE, South Africa, Germany, Philippines, Indonesia and Hong Kong. ABS is majority owned by the Permira funds which are Name: ADVANTECH WIRELESS advised by European Private Equity firm Permira. The Permira Address: 657 Orly Avenue, Montreal, QC, H9P funds acquired ABS in 2010. 1G1, Canada. Led by a management team of talented and experienced Tel: +1 514 420 0045 professionals, ABS offers a complete range of end-to-end Fax: +1 514 420 0073 solutions including Direct to Home (DTH), Cable TV distribution Email: [email protected] (CATV), cellular backhaul, VSAT and Internet backbone Internet: www.advantechwireless.com services with diverse IP transit through its European, Middle Contact: Cristi Damian East and Asian internet gateways. Job Title: Vice President, Business Development ABS operates a fleet of satellites serving 93 percent of the Advantech Wireless delivers intelligent broadband world. communications solutions that achieve excellence, maximize performance and minimize operational costs, all with • ABS-2 (75°E, prime orbital location); uncompromising quality. Ultimately, the company helps people • ABS-2A launched on 15th June 2016 (75°E, prime orbital stay connected and informed by designing and manufacturing location); the most advanced terrestrial and satellite communication • ABS-3 (85.3°E); technologies on the planet.
    [Show full text]