The Coldest Front: Cold War Military Properties in Alaska Revised and Expanded ______

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Coldest Front: Cold War Military Properties in Alaska Revised and Expanded ______ 1 United States Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program _________ The Coldest Front: Cold War Military Properties in Alaska Revised and Expanded _________ Prepared in Cooperation with the Alaska State Historic Preservation Officer February 1996, August 2012 Stewardship ● Leadership ● Partnership 2 Legacy The Legacy Resource Management Program was established by the Congress of the United States in 1991 to provide the Department of Defense with an opportunity to enhance the management of stewardship resources on over 25 million acres of land under DoD jurisdiction. Legacy allows DoD to determine how to better integrate the conservation of irreplaceable biological, cultural and geophysical resources with the dynamic requirements of military missions. To achieve this goal, DoD gives high priority to inventorying, protecting, and restoring biological, cultural and geophysical resources in a comprehensive, cost-effective manner, in partnership with federal, state and local agencies and private groups. Legacy activities help to ensure that DoD personnel better understand the need for protection and conservation of natural and cultural resources and that the management of these resources will be fully integrated with and support DoD mission activities and the public interest. Through the combined efforts of the DoD components, Legacy seeks to achieve its legislative purposes with cooperation, industry and creativity, to make the DoD the federal environmental leader. ________________________________________________________________________ This document was prepared in partnership with Alaska State Historic Preservation Officer Judith E. Bittner Colorado State University Center for the Environmental Management of Military Lands Prepared by William J. Siedler Office of History and Archaeology Alaska Department of Natural Resources 550 W. 7th Ave. Suite 1310 Anchorage, Alaska 99501–3565 Updated and with New Material by Leighton M. Quarles Natalie K. Thomas Colorado State University Center for the Environmental Management of Military Lands Fort Wainwright, Alaska Special thanks to Joe B. Orr, Historian, USAF John H. Cloe, Historian, USAF Dr. Colt Denfeld, COE Alaska District Alaska Cold War Working Group This document is a Legacy Resource Management Program work project and does not reflect the policy, practices, or doctrine of the Department of Defense or the United States Government. 3 Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................... The Military Situation in 1946 .................................................................... Impacts on Alaska ................................................................................... The Coldest Front ................................................................................... Detect and Monitor ........................................................................................... Aircraft Control and Warning System ........................................................... Distant Early Warning (DEW) Line ............................................................. Ballistic Missile Early Warning Site ............................................................. Missile Defense Alarm System ............................................................. Space Detection and Tracking System ............................................................. Solid State Phased Array Radar System ............................................................. Over the Horizon Backscatter Radar ............................................................. Cobra Dane Radar ................................................................................... Communicate ................................................................................................... White Alice Communications System ........................................................... Intercept and Respond ........................................................................................ Nike Missile System ............................................................. Elmendorf Air Force Base ............................................................. Ladd Air Force Base ............................................................. Eielson Air Force Base ............................................................. Forward Operating Bases .......................................................................... Shemya Air Force Base ............................................................. Guard and Defend ............................................................. Army Bases ............................................................. Fort Richardson ............................................................. Fort Wainwright ............................................................. Naval Bases ............................................................. Naval Air Station Adak/Naval Complex Adak ........................... Naval Operating Base Kodiak ........................... Tomorrow’s War ............................................................. The Atomic Alaska ............................................................. Project Chariot ............................................................. Amchitka Nuclear Test Site, 1966–1971 ............................................................. Fort Greely SM-1A Nuclear Plant ............................................................. Cold Weather Testing and Arctic Research ............................................................. Fort Greely ............................................................. Naval Arctic Research Laboratory ............................................................. Conclusion ...................................................................................................... Timeline ......................................................................................................... Glossary of Acronyms ........................................................................................ Annotated Bibliography ...................................................................................... 4 The Coldest Front: Cold War Military Properties in Alaska Figures *See the attached image guide 5 Introduction From the late 1940s through 1989, Alaska served as America’s Cold War sentinel and important air defense shield against the threat of Soviet attack over the North Pole. A threat of global proportion, the Cold War consumed $12 trillion from the U.S. Treasury and spanned nearly the lifetime of a generation of Americans.1 In the course of the Cold War, America amassed a vast standing army, a global intelligence network, and a military-industrial economic complex. By general convention, 1946 was the year the Cold War began. It was the year of George F. Kennan’s Long Telegram2 and former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill’s Iron Curtain speech at Fulton, Missouri.3 In November 1989, the Berlin Wall came down, and, in December 1991, the Soviet Union dissolved, officially ending the Cold War. The advent of atomic weapons in the 1940s revolutionized the way American military planners thought about how future wars might be fought. Within weeks after the end of World War II, American strategic military planners had identified 20 Soviet cities as potential atomic targets.4 By 1949, the Soviets also had the bomb. With the advances in aircraft and missile technologies, delivery of nuclear weapons to one’s enemy over the pole became a major threat. This “polar concept” marked a sea change in military strategy.5 British historian Sir John Keegan observed that 99% of the world’s wars were waged between the tropics of Cancer and Capricorn.6 The Cold War was the first to feature major theaters of operations above the Arctic Circle, assuring a prominent role for Alaska. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the United States and its erstwhile enemy, the newly formed post-Soviet states, had enormous defense infrastructures focused on central Europe and the Arctic. Nearly every permutation of the Cold War, from the early years of George Kennan’s containment policy through Eisenhower’s “massive retaliation,” through détente and the “winnable nuclear war,” saw either an increase in arctic manpower—most notable during the 1950s—or an advance in or modification of the weapons and communications systems distributed across the circumpolar North.7 Following the Cold War, substantial components of the West’s northern military establishment were taken offline, and the future of a few Alaskan bases is currently in doubt. Nonetheless, the U.S. maintains a military presence in Alaska, serving a global response role first employed in Vietnam and now expanded to support operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Military Situation in 1946 The end of World War II saw the German and Japanese threats extinguished and British and French capacity badly diminished, leaving the United States and the Soviet Union as the preeminent powers in the world, with Soviet and Western forces facing each other in central Europe and across the Bering Strait. The United States, following its bombing of the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, had proven the world’s clear leader in military technology. U.S./Soviet relations rapidly cooled due to arguments over the fate of Europe and a growing sense on both sides of the incompatibility of communism and capitalism. Soviet leader Joseph Stalin 1 Betts, Richard K. Military Readiness:
Recommended publications
  • Hearing National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 Oversight of Previously Authorized Programs Committee on Armed S
    i [H.A.S.C. No. 112–111] HEARING ON NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013 AND OVERSIGHT OF PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED PROGRAMS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC FORCES HEARING ON FISCAL YEAR 2013 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION BUDGET REQUEST FOR MISSILE DEFENSE HEARING HELD MARCH 6, 2012 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 73–437 WASHINGTON : 2012 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, http://bookstore.gpo.gov. For more information, contact the GPO Customer Contact Center, U.S. Government Printing Office. Phone 202–512–1800, or 866–512–1800 (toll-free). E-mail, [email protected]. SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC FORCES MICHAEL TURNER, Ohio, Chairman TRENT FRANKS, Arizona LORETTA SANCHEZ, California DOUG LAMBORN, Colorado JAMES R. LANGEVIN, Rhode Island MO BROOKS, Alabama RICK LARSEN, Washington MAC THORNBERRY, Texas MARTIN HEINRICH, New Mexico MIKE ROGERS, Alabama JOHN R. GARAMENDI, California JOHN C. FLEMING, M.D., Louisiana C.A. DUTCH RUPPERSBERGER, Maryland SCOTT RIGELL, Virginia BETTY SUTTON, Ohio AUSTIN SCOTT, Georgia TIM MORRISON, Professional Staff Member LEONOR TOMERO, Professional Staff Member AARON FALK, Staff Assistant (II) C O N T E N T S CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF HEARINGS 2012 Page HEARING: Tuesday, March 6, 2012, Fiscal Year 2013 National Defense Authorization Budget Request for Missile Defense ................................................................... 1 APPENDIX: Tuesday, March 6, 2012 .......................................................................................... 33 TUESDAY, MARCH 6, 2012 FISCAL YEAR 2013 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION BUDGET REQUEST FOR MISSILE DEFENSE STATEMENTS PRESENTED BY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS Sanchez, Hon. Loretta, a Representative from California, Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Strategic Forces .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Land Use Study
    Fairbanks North Star Borough Joint Land Use Study United States Army, Fort Wainwright United States Air Force, Eielson Air Force Base Fairbanks North Star Borough, Planning Department July 2006 Produced by ASCG Incorporated of Alaska Fairbanks North Star Borough Joint Land Use Study Fairbanks Joint Land Use Study This study was prepared under contract with Fairbanks North Star Borough with financial support from the Office of Economic Adjustment, Department of Defense. The content reflects the views of Fairbanks North Star Borough and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of Economic Adjustment. Historical Hangar, Fort Wainwright Army Base Eielson Air Force Base i Fairbanks North Star Borough Joint Land Use Study Table of Contents 1.0 Study Purpose and Process................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Study Objectives ............................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Planning Area................................................................................................................. 2 1.4 Participating Stakeholders.............................................................................................. 4 1.5 Public Participation........................................................................................................ 5 1.6 Issue Identification........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Downloadable Content the Supermarine
    AIRFRAME & MINIATURE No.12 The Supermarine Spitfire Part 1 (Merlin-powered) including the Seafire Downloadable Content v1.0 August 2018 II Airframe & Miniature No.12 Spitfire – Foreign Service Foreign Service Depot, where it was scrapped around 1968. One other Spitfire went to Argentina, that being PR Mk XI PL972, which was sold back to Vickers Argentina in March 1947, fitted with three F.24 cameras with The only official interest in the Spitfire from the 8in focal length lens, a 170Imp. Gal ventral tank Argentine Air Force (Fuerca Aerea Argentina) was and two wing tanks. In this form it was bought by an attempt to buy two-seat T Mk 9s in the 1950s, James and Jack Storey Aerial Photography Com- PR Mk XI, LV-NMZ with but in the end they went ahead and bought Fiat pany and taken by James Storey (an ex-RAF Flt Lt) a 170Imp. Gal. slipper G.55Bs instead. F Mk IXc BS116 was allocated to on the 15th April 1947. After being issued with tank installed, it also had the Fuerca Aerea Argentina, but this allocation was the CofA it was flown to Argentina via London, additional fuel in the cancelled and the airframe scrapped by the RAF Gibraltar, Dakar, Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, Montevi- wings and fuselage before it was ever sent. deo and finally Buenos Aires, arriving at Morón airport on the 7th May 1947 (the exhausts had burnt out en route and were replaced with those taken from JF275). Storey hoped to gain an aerial mapping contract from the Argentine Government but on arrival was told that his ‘contract’ was not recognised and that his services were not required.
    [Show full text]
  • Kodiaks Welcome Ice Dogs Staff Sgt
    FREE RECYCLED an edition of the Recycled material is used in the making of our ALASKA POST newsprint The Interior Military News Connection Vol. 7, No. 42 Fort Wainwright, Alaska October 21, 2016 Kodiaks welcome Ice Dogs Staff Sgt. Christina in a positive effort to build J. Turnipseed healthy relationships be- 1st Stryker Brigade tween 1st SBCT (Arctic Soldiers of the 70th Brigade Engineer Battalion, 1st Stryker Brigade Combat Team host members of the Wolves) and members of Combat Team PAO Fairbanks Ice Dogs Hockey Club at Fort Wainwright Oct. 12. The Ice Dogs spent the morning with Soldiers Fairbanks community. doing CrossFit, eating in the Wolves Den Inn Dinning Facility and witnessing a dry run combined arms breach The 70th Brigade Engi- “We’re just trying to demonstration. (Photo by Sgt. Corey Confer, 1st Stryker Brigade Combat Team PAO) neer Battalion (Kodiaks), develop a pairing program 1st Stryker Brigade Com- with a lot of the local in- UAF (University of Alas- Lair exercise gym at appreciated the challeng- “I like it,” said Marva. bat Team welcomed the stitutions,” said Lt. Col. ka) and working with the around 6 a.m. with Cross- ing PT session. “I like that they told us Fairbanks Ice Dogs Hock- Anthony Barbina, 70th Ice Dogs. This is one of Fit led by 1st Sgt. Alex Julius Marva, one of the they do it every morning. ey Club to Fort Wain- BEB commander. “1st the events.” Archillaburgos, the Head- club members here in Fair- It was a good workout.” wright Oct. 12. Brigade Arctic Wolves The early morning ad- quarters and Headquarters banks from Finland, com- Nick Rogers of the Ice The Engineers and the has been working with venture started on Fort first sergeant.
    [Show full text]
  • An Air Force Almanac
    THE UNITED STATES AIR FORCE IN FACTS AND FIGURES An Air Force Almanac On the following pages appears a variety of infor- Affairs in its role as liaison with Air Staff agencies porting unit reports or in the "Guide to Major mation and statistical material about the US Air in bringing up to date the comparable data from USAF Installations Worldwide") because of differ- Force-its people, organization, equipment, fund- last year's "Almanac." ent cutoff dates, rounding, differing methods of ing, activities, bases, and heroes. This "Almanac" A word of caution: Personnel figures that ap- reporting, or categories of personnel that are ex- section was compiled by the staff of AIR FORCE pear in this section in different forms will not agree cluded in some cases. These figures do illustrate Magazine. We especially acknowledge the help of (nor will they always agree with figures in com- trends, however, and may be helpful in placing the Secretary of the Air Force Office of Public mand, separate operating agency, and direct re- force fluctuations in perspective. -THE EDITORS USAF-EVOLUTION OF THE NAME AND THE SERVICE'S LEADERS' DESIGNATION FROM TO COMMANDER (at highest rank) TITLE FROM TO Aeronautical Div., US Signal Corps Aug. 1, 1907 July 18, 1914 Brig. Gen. James Men Chief Signal Officer Aug 1, 1907 Feb. 13. 1913 Brig. Gen. George P. Scdven Chief Signal Officer Feb. 13, 1913 July 18, 1914 Aviation Section, US Signal Corps July 18, 1914 May 24. 1918 Brig, Gen. George P Scriven Chief Signal Officer July 18. 1914 Feb. 13. 1917 Maj.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force Sexual Assault Court-Martial Summaries 2010 March 2015
    Air Force Sexual Assault Court-Martial Summaries 2010 March 2015 – The Air Force is committed to preventing, deterring, and prosecuting sexual assault in its ranks. This report contains a synopsis of sexual assault cases taken to trial by court-martial. The information contained herein is a matter of public record. This is the final report of this nature the Air Force will produce. All results of general and special courts-martial for trials occurring after 1 April 2015 will be available on the Air Force’s Court-Martial Docket Website (www.afjag.af.mil/docket/index.asp). SIGNIFICANT AIR FORCE SEXUAL ASSAULT CASE SUMMARIES 2010 – March 2015 Note: This report lists cases involving a conviction for a sexual assault offense committed against an adult and also includes cases where a sexual assault offense against an adult was charged and the member was either acquitted of a sexual assault offense or the sexual assault offense was dismissed, but the member was convicted of another offense involving a victim. The Air Force publishes these cases for deterrence purposes. Sex offender registration requirements are governed by Department of Defense policy in compliance with federal and state sex offender registration requirements. Not all convictions included in this report require sex offender registration. Beginning with July 2014 cases, this report also indicates when a victim was represented by a Special Victims’ Counsel. Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, sexual assaults against those 16 years of age and older are charged as crimes against adults. The appropriate disposition of sexual assault allegations and investigations may not always include referral to trial by court-martial.
    [Show full text]
  • Air & Space Power Journal
    July–August 2013 Volume 27, No. 4 AFRP 10-1 Senior Leader Perspective The Air Advisor ❙ 4 The Face of US Air Force Engagement Maj Gen Timothy M. Zadalis, USAF Features The Swarm, the Cloud, and the Importance of Getting There First ❙ 14 What’s at Stake in the Remote Aviation Culture Debate Maj David J. Blair, USAF Capt Nick Helms, USAF The Next Lightweight Fighter ❙ 39 Not Your Grandfather’s Combat Aircraft Col Michael W. Pietrucha, USAF Building Partnership Capacity by Using MQ-9s in the Asia-Pacific ❙ 59 Col Andrew A. Torelli, USAF Personnel Security during Joint Operations with Foreign Military Forces ❙ 79 David C. Aykens Departments 101 ❙ Views The Glass Ceiling for Remotely Piloted Aircraft ❙ 101 Lt Col Lawrence Spinetta, PhD, USAF Funding Cyberspace: The Case for an Air Force Venture Capital Initiative ❙ 119 Maj Chadwick M. Steipp, USAF Strategic Distraction: The Consequence of Neglecting Organizational Design ❙ 129 Col John F. Price Jr., USAF 140 ❙ Book Reviews Master of the Air: William Tunner and the Success of Military Airlift . 140 Robert A. Slayton Reviewer: Frank Kalesnik, PhD Selling Air Power: Military Aviation and American Popular Culture after World War II . 142 Steve Call Reviewer: Scott D. Murdock From Lexington to Baghdad and Beyond: War and Politics in the American Experience, 3rd ed . 144 Donald M. Snow and Dennis M. Drew Reviewer: Capt Chris Sanders, USAF Beer, Bacon, and Bullets: Culture in Coalition Warfare from Gallipoli to Iraq . 147 Gal Luft Reviewer: Col Chad T. Manske, USAF Global Air Power . 149 John Andreas Olsen, editor Reviewer: Lt Col P.
    [Show full text]
  • Shemyaafr,Alaska 1992IRPFIELD INVESTIGATIONREPORT
    EM0-1096 VOL 1 ShemyaAFR,Alaska 1992IRPFIELD INVESTIGATIOREPN ORT Volume 1 of 4 TECHNICAL .., FINAL February1993 preparedfor U.S.Air Force IO ElmendorfAFB,Alaska 11th AirControlWing 1lth CivilEngineeringOperationsSquadron UnderContractDEU-91-06 Preparedby CH2MHILL RC.Box8748 Boise,Idaho83707 For EnvironmentalManagementOperations Undera RelatedServicesAgreement withtheU.S.Departmentof Energy EnvironmentalManagementOperations Richland,Washington99352 j OtSTR|BUTIOPJ 0_:: ii-tIU L_OCuiviENT iL, ',..;;'-,_;;;.,.';,:{:1;" ,. FINAL I i i NOTICE i This report has been prepared for the United States Air Force by CH2M HILL for the purpose of aiding in the implementation of a final remedial action plan under the Air Force Installation Restoration Program (IRP). As the report relates to actual or possible releases of potentially hazardous substances, its release prior to an Air Force final decision on remedial action may be in the public's interest. The limited objectives of this report and the ongoing nature of the IRP, along with the evolving knowledge of site conditions and chemical effects on the environment and health, must be considered when evaluating this report, since subsequent facts may become known which may make this report premature or inaccurate. Acceptance of this report in performance of the contract under which it is prepared does not mean that the Air Force adopts the conclusions, recommendations or other views expressed herein, which are those of the contractor only and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the United States Air Force. Government agencies and their contractors registered with the Defense TechnicalInformationCenter (DTIC) should direct requestsfop copies of.this report to: Defense Technical InformationCenter (DTIC), Cameron Station,Alexandria, VA 22304-6145.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Dominic I
    OPERATION DOMINIC I United States Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Tests Nuclear Test Personnel Review Prepared by the Defense Nuclear Agency as Executive Agency for the Department of Defense HRE- 0 4 3 6 . .% I.., -., 5. ooument. Tbe t k oorreotsd oontraofor that tad oa the book aw ra-ready c I I i I 1 1 I 1 I 1 i I I i I I I i i t I REPORT NUMBER 2. GOVT ACCESSION NC I NA6OccOF 1 i Technical Report 7. AUTHOR(.) i L. Berkhouse, S.E. Davis, F.R. Gladeck, J.H. Hallowell, C.B. Jones, E.J. Martin, DNAOO1-79-C-0472 R.A. Miller, F.W. McMullan, M.J. Osborne I I 9. PERFORMING ORGAMIIATION NWE AN0 AODRCSS ID. PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT. TASU Kamn Tempo AREA & WOW UNIT'NUMSERS P.O. Drawer (816 State St.) QQ . Subtask U99QAXMK506-09 ; Santa Barbara, CA 93102 11. CONTROLLING OFClCC MAME AM0 ADDRESS 12. REPORT DATE 1 nirpctor- . - - - Defense Nuclear Agency Washington, DC 20305 71, MONITORING AGENCY NAME AODRCSs(rfdIfI*mI ka CamlIlIU Olllc.) IS. SECURITY CLASS. (-1 ah -*) J Unclassified SCHCDULC 1 i 1 I 1 IO. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES This work was sponsored by the Defense Nuclear Agency under RDT&E RMSS 1 Code 6350079464 U99QAXMK506-09 H2590D. For sale by the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 19. KEY WOROS (Cmlmm a nm.. mid. I1 n.c...-7 .nd Id.nllh 4 bled nlrmk) I Nuclear Testing Polaris KINGFISH Nuclear Test Personnel Review (NTPR) FISHBOWL TIGHTROPE DOMINIC Phase I Christmas Island CHECKMATE 1 Johnston Island STARFISH SWORDFISH ASROC BLUEGILL (Continued) D.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Office of the Secretary
    Monday, May 16, 2005 Part LXII Department of Defense Office of the Secretary Base Closures and Realignments (BRAC); Notice VerDate jul<14>2003 10:07 May 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\16MYN2.SGM 16MYN2 28030 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 93 / Monday, May 16, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Headquarters U.S. Army Forces Budget/Funding, Contracting, Command (FORSCOM), and the Cataloging, Requisition Processing, Office of the Secretary Headquarters U.S. Army Reserve Customer Services, Item Management, Command (USARC) to Pope Air Force Stock Control, Weapon System Base Closures and Realignments Base, NC. Relocate the Headquarters 3rd Secondary Item Support, Requirements (BRAC) U.S. Army to Shaw Air Force Base, SC. Determination, Integrated Materiel AGENCY: Department of Defense. Relocate the Installation Management Management Technical Support ACTION: Notice of Recommended Base Agency Southeastern Region Inventory Control Point functions for Closures and Realignments. Headquarters and the U.S. Army Consumable Items to Defense Supply Network Enterprise Technology Center Columbus, OH, and reestablish SUMMARY: The Secretary of Defense is Command (NETCOM) Southeastern them as Defense Logistics Agency authorized to recommend military Region Headquarters to Fort Eustis, VA. Inventory Control Point functions; installations inside the United States for Relocate the Army Contracting Agency relocate the procurement management closure and realignment in accordance Southern Region Headquarters to Fort and related support functions for Depot with Section 2914(a) of the Defense Base Sam Houston. Level Reparables to Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, and designate them as Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, as Operational Army (IGPBS) amended (Pub.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 the Magazine
    SCANDINAVIAN AVIATION MAGAZINE NO the MAGAzINE 03 2017 18th Aggressor Squadron - the blue foxes Eielson Air Force base in Alaska is home to one of only two USAF Aggressor Squadrons, the 18th Aggressor Squadron – also known as The Blue Foxes. BALTOPS & SABER STRIKE The Red Devils Tornado Dawn Strike 2017 Between May 28 and June 24, The 6° Stormo“Diavoli Rossi”, “Dawn Strike 17” was the final the exercises Baltops and Saber also know as the Red Devils, exercise in a six month long Royal Strike were taking place above are the last wing to fly the Australian Air Force “Air Warfare the Baltic Region. Tornado in the Italian Air Force. Instructor Course 2017”. SCANDINAVIAN AVIATION MAGAZINE This magazine features a look into the major exercises Baltops and Saber Strike, which has taking place in the Baltic Region, as well as a close look to one of the USAF aggressor units, the 18th Aggressor Squadron. We hope you like the magazine - enjoy! THE MAGAzINE The Red Devils Tornado 04 The 6° Stormo“Diavoli Rossi”, also know as the Red Devils, are the last wing to fly the Tornado in the Italian Air Force. Andrea Avian gives us a closer look at the the Red Devils. Exercise Dawn Strike 2017 18 Exercise “Dawn Strike 2017” was the final exercise in a six month long Royal Australian Air Force “Air Warfare Instructor Course 2017”. Jeroen Oude Wolbers reports from Australia. BALTOPS & SABER STRIKE 2017 24 Between the 28th of May and the 24th of June, the exercises Baltops and Saber Strike were taking place above the Baltic Region.
    [Show full text]