DOCSLIB.ORG

Air Force Sexual Assault Court-Martial Summaries 2010 March 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Air Force Sexual Assault Court-Martial Summaries 2010 March 2015 Air Force Sexual Assault Court-Martial Summaries 2010 March 2015 – The Air Force is committed to preventing, deterring, and prosecuting sexual assault in its ranks. This report contains a synopsis of sexual assault cases taken to trial by court-martial. The information contained herein is a matter of public record. This is the final report of this nature the Air Force will produce. All results of general and special courts-martial for trials occurring after 1 April 2015 will be available on the Air Force’s Court-Martial Docket Website (www.afjag.af.mil/docket/index.asp). SIGNIFICANT AIR FORCE SEXUAL ASSAULT CASE SUMMARIES 2010 – March 2015 Note: This report lists cases involving a conviction for a sexual assault offense committed against an adult and also includes cases where a sexual assault offense against an adult was charged and the member was either acquitted of a sexual assault offense or the sexual assault offense was dismissed, but the member was convicted of another offense involving a victim. The Air Force publishes these cases for deterrence purposes. Sex offender registration requirements are governed by Department of Defense policy in compliance with federal and state sex offender registration requirements. Not all convictions included in this report require sex offender registration. Beginning with July 2014 cases, this report also indicates when a victim was represented by a Special Victims’ Counsel. Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, sexual assaults against those 16 years of age and older are charged as crimes against adults. The appropriate disposition of sexual assault allegations and investigations may not always include referral to trial by court-martial. Less serious cases may be more appropriately handled through adverse administrative actions. Each military justice case must be resolved on its own facts. There are no expected or required dispositions, outcomes, or sentences in any military justice case, other than those resulting from the individual facts and merits of a case and the application of due process of law. Adjudged sentences reported here do not reflect any relief on the sentence that may have been granted during clemency, pursuant to a pretrial agreement in exchange for a guilty plea, or on appeal. The Air Force reports conviction rates for sexual assault offenses on a yearly basis. For Fiscal Year 2014, the conviction rate was 43% for sexual assault offenses. This rate is calculated based on cases that are included in the Department of Defense Annual Report on Sexual Assault in the Military. List of Air Force Installations with Significant Sexual Assault Cases for 2010 – March 2015 380 Air Expeditionary Wing Laughlin Air Force Base Altus Air Force Base Little Rock Air Force Base Andersen Air Force Base Luke Air Force Base Aviano Air Base MacDill Air Force Base Barksdale Air Force Base Malmstrom Air Force Base Beale Air Force Base Maxwell Air Force Base Buckley Air Force Base Kirtland Air Force Base Cannon Air Force Base McChord Air Force Base Columbus Air Force Base McConnell Air Force Base Return to List of Air Force Installations Page 2 of 134 Davis-Monthan Air Force Base Minot Air Force Base Dover Air Force Base Misawa Air Base Dyess Air Force Base Moody Air Force Base Edwards Air Force Base Mountain Home Air Force Base Eglin Air Force Base Nellis Air Force Base Eielson Air Force Base Offutt Air Force Base Ellsworth Air Force Base Osan Air Base Fairchild Air Force Base Peterson Air Force Base F.E. Warren Air Force Base Pope Field Fort Meade Ramstein Air Base Goodfellow Air Force Base Robins Air Force Base Grand Forks Air Force Base Royal Air Force Lakenheath Hill Air Force Base Royal Air Force Mildenhall Holloman Air Force Base Schriever Air Force Base Hurlburt Field Scott Air Force Base Incirlik Air Base Seymour Johnson Air Force Base Joint Base Andrews Naval Air Facility Shaw Air Force Base Washington Joint Base Charleston Sheppard Air Force Base Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson Spangdahlem Air Base Joint Base Langley-Eustis Tinker Air Force Base Joint Base Lewis-McChord Travis Air Force Base Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst Tyndall Air Force Base Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam United States Air Force Academy Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland Vandenberg Air Force Base Joint Base San Antonio-Randolph Whiteman Air Force Base Kadena Air Base Wright-Patterson Air Force Base Keesler Air Force Base Yokota Air Base Return to List of Air Force Installations Page 3 of 134 380 Air Expeditionary Wing United States v. A1C Jasper C. Brooks Base: 380 AEW, Afghanistan Synopsis: While deployed to Afghanistan, A1C Brooks entered the room of a female Airman while she slept, removed his pants, got into bed with her, and kissed her while rubbing his penis on her leg. On separate occasions, he would expose his penis to her and touch her while at work, without her consent. Trial Results: On 17 Oct 12, at a general court-martial, A1C Brooks was convicted of abusive sexual contact, indecent acts, assault consummated by a battery, unlawful entry, 2 counts of false official statement, and violating a general order. Adjudged Sentence: A1C Brooks was sentenced to confinement for 10 months, a bad conduct discharge, reduction in grade to E-1, and forfeiture of all pay and allowances. United States v. SrA James A. Mueller Base: 380 AEW, Afghanistan Synopsis: While deployed, SrA Mueller attempted to unhook the bra of a female Airman by reaching under her shirt after exceeding the daily limit of alcoholic drinks at his deployed location. Trial Results: On 2 Jul 13, at a summary court-martial, SrA Mueller was convicted of abusive sexual contact, false official statement, and failure to obey a lawful general order. Adjudged Sentence: SrA Mueller was sentenced to 14 days confinement, forfeiture of $500 and reduction in grade to E-1. Return to List of Air Force Installations Page 4 of 134 Altus Air Force Base United States v. SrA Johnathan T. Daniel Base: Altus AFB, OK Synopsis: Two female Airmen went to Oklahoma City for the weekend to celebrate the victim’s birthday. While there they met up with three male coworkers. After a night of heavy drinking, the female Airmen went back to their hotel room and allowed SrA Daniel and another male Airman to sleep in their room because they had been locked out of their hotel room. During the night, the victim awoke to SrA Daniel attempting to have sexual intercourse with her. Trial Results: On 25 Jan 13, at a general court-martial, SrA Daniel was convicted of abusive sexual contact. Adjudged Sentence: SrA Daniel was sentenced to confinement for 12 months, a dishonorable discharge, and reduction in grade to E-1. United States v. A1C Brandon Cutrer Base: Altus AFB, OK Synopsis: In May 13, victim, a female Airman, and A1C Cutrer spent the night in a hotel room after going shopping and out to dinner. The victim and A1C Cutrer had a prior sexual relationship. Victim fell asleep next to A1C Cutrer. A1C Cutrer sexually assaulted victim while she was sleeping. Victim initially made a restricted report but changed her report to unrestricted approximately five days later. Trial Results: On 22 Oct 13, at a general court-martial, A1C Cutrer was convicted of sexual assault. Sentence: A1C Cutrer was sentenced to confinement for 3 years, a dishonorable discharge, total forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction in grade to E-1. Return to List of Air Force Installations Page 5 of 134 Andersen Air Force Base United States v. TSgt Chad K. Gomes Base: Andersen AFB, Guam Synopsis: Victim #1, a female Airman, reported that in Aug 13 she went to a house party where Subject was also in attendance. Victim #1 was a subordinate of Subject. While there, Subject made inappropriate comments to Victim #1, hit her buttocks with his hand numerous times throughout the party, and poked her breast through her clothing. Victim #1 also reported that she took Subject and Victim #2 to a restaurant as their designated driver later that evening. While there, Victim #2, a female Airman who was intoxicated, leaned over a table. Victim #2 was a subordinate of Subject. Subject reached across the table and poked Victim #2 in the breast. Victim #3, also a female Airman, stated that in Dec 13 she was invited to a local bar and restaurant by the Subject. Victim #3 was a subordinate of Subject. She reported that he touched her buttocks, collar bone, attempted to touch her breast, and made inappropriate comments to her. Trial Results: On 6 Jun 14, at a special court-martial, TSgt Gomes was found guilty of two specifications of indecent language towards two victims and five specifications of assault against two victims. Four specifications of sexual assault were dismissed in accordance with a pretrial agreement. Adjudged Sentence: TSgt Gomes was sentenced to reduction to E-4, confinement for 30 days, forfeitures of $500, and a reprimand. Return to List of Air Force Installations Page 6 of 134 United States v. Amn Samuel C. McCrary Base: Andersen AFB, Guam Synopsis: In Oct 13, Victim, a female Airman, reported that she was sexually assaulted by Amn McCrary in Aug 13. The victim stated that she consumed alcohol with Amn McCrary and another male A1C in her dorm room. She stated her last recollection was being kissed, but she could not remember who kissed her. The next morning she realized that her underwear and shorts had been removed, and she dressed and left her room. Later that day she started to suspect that there may have been sexual intercourse the previous night. During the investigation of the case, Amn McCrary and the A1C admitted to having sexual intercourse with the victim, but stated it was consensual.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Defense - Military Base Realignments and Closures (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 11, folder “Defense - Military Base Realignments and Closures (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 11 of The John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON October 31, 197 5 MEMORANDUM TO: JACK MARSH FROM: RUSS ROURKE I discussed the Ft. Dix situation with Rep. Ed Forsythe again. As you may know, I reviewed the matter with Marty Hoffman at noon yesterday, and with Col. Kenneth Bailey several days ago. Actually, I exchanged intelligence information with him. Hoffman and Bailey advised me that no firm decision has as yet been made with regard to the retention of the training function at Dix. On Novem­ ber 5, Marty Hotfman will receive a briefing by Army staff on pos­ sible "back fill'' organizations that may be available to go to Dix in the event the training function moves out.
    [Show full text]
  • A Valley Ruled by Giants; Looking Back 20 Years at Unit History
    A valley ruled by Giants; looking back 20 years at unit history http://www.dm.af.mil/news/story_print.asp?id=123138863 A valley ruled by Giants; looking back 20 years at unit history by Master Sgt. Ruby Zarzyczny 943rd Rescue Group Public Affairs 3/9/2009 - DAVIS-MONTHAN AIR FORCE BASE, Ariz. -- Twenty years ago at the 943 rd Rescue Group's reservists worked in the "Valley of the Giants." Here on the flight line, six Jolly Green Giant helicopters call-sign Pony resided on the flight line. There these giants, towered more than 18 feet tall, stretched 73 feet, and more than 15 feet wide awaited the call of the 71st Special Operations Squadron. When called, these Ponies, two CH-3Es and four HH-3Es helicopters, weighed more than 22,000 (max) pounds, equipped with hoist (HH-3Es) and two 50 cal machines guns, used two General Electric T58-GE5 turbo shaft engines to soar to altitudes of up to 21,000 feet to traverse terrain where angels feared to tread. Most of these helicopters were Vietnam Veterans many flying A 71st SOS HH-3E Jolly Green Giant helicopter hoists a reservist during a training mission in the Southern with the 20th Helicopter Squadron and the 21 Special Arizona desert in the late 1980s. (Courtesy photo) Operations Squadron in Southeast Asia supporting Operation Pony Express before entering the Air Force Reserve fleet. According to Senior MasterSgt. Henry Shaw, 943rd Maintenance Squadron, supporting this operation is how they got their call sign that is still used today with our HH-60 Pavehawk helicopters.
    [Show full text]
  • AIRLIFT RODEO a Brief History of Airlift Competitions, 1961-1989
    "- - ·· - - ( AIRLIFT RODEO A Brief History of Airlift Competitions, 1961-1989 Office of MAC History Monograph by JefferyS. Underwood Military Airlift Command United States Air Force Scott Air Force Base, Illinois March 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword . iii Introduction . 1 CARP Rodeo: First Airdrop Competitions .............. 1 New Airplanes, New Competitions ....... .. .. ... ... 10 Return of the Rodeo . 16 A New Name and a New Orientation ..... ........... 24 The Future of AIRLIFT RODEO . ... .. .. ..... .. .... 25 Appendix I .. .... ................. .. .. .. ... ... 27 Appendix II ... ...... ........... .. ..... ..... .. 28 Appendix III .. .. ................... ... .. 29 ii FOREWORD Not long after the Military Air Transport Service received its air­ drop mission in the mid-1950s, MATS senior commanders speculated that the importance of the new airdrop mission might be enhanced through a tactical training competition conducted on a recurring basis. Their idea came to fruition in 1962 when MATS held its first airdrop training competition. For the next several years the competition remained an annual event, but it fell by the wayside during the years of the United States' most intense participation in the Southeast Asia conflict. The airdrop competitions were reinstated in 1969 but were halted again in 1973, because of budget cuts and the reduced emphasis being given to airdrop operations. However, the esprit de corps engendered among the troops and the training benefits derived from the earlier events were not forgotten and prompted the competition's renewal in 1979 in its present form. Since 1979 the Rodeos have remained an important training event and tactical evaluation exercise for the Military Airlift Command. The following historical study deals with the origins, evolution, and results of the tactical airlift competitions in MATS and MAC.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION
    CALIFORNIA HISTORIC MILITARY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES INVENTORY VOLUME II: THE HISTORY AND HISTORIC RESOURCES OF THE MILITARY IN CALIFORNIA, 1769-1989 by Stephen D. Mikesell Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION Prepared by: JRP JRP HISTORICAL CONSULTING SERVICES Davis, California 95616 March 2000 California llistoric Military Buildings and Stnictures Inventory, Volume II CONTENTS CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................... i FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................. iv PREFACE .................................................................................................................................... viii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1-1 2.0 COLONIAL ERA (1769-1846) .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Spanish-Mexican Era Buildings Owned by the Military ............................................... 2-8 2.2 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Alamogordo Public Schools & Holloman Air Force Base
    Alamogordo Public Schools & Holloman Air Force Base 2013 National Blue Ribbon School Award Winner! Holloman Elementary Students and Airmen enjoy HMS was the ONLY Middle School in Field Day activities the State of New Mexico to receive this honor. Holloman Big Give’s Project: “Stuff the Bus” donates backpacks, school supplies and Walmart Gift Cards Holloman Middle School Holiday Food Drive APS Open House at Holloman AFB F-16s from Holloman AFB’s 314th Fighter Squadron honor military students from Holloman Elementary & Middle Schools with a flyby during the Month of the Military Child Operation Soldier Smiles 2016 Airmen Cookie Drive 2016 AFJROTC Pass-in-Review Change of Command Ceremony 101 year old WWII Veteran lights a candle and is honored for his service during Veterans’ Day Assembly Alamogordo Public Schools was proud to bestow Korean War Veteran, Jose Benitez his High School Diploma 62 years after he returned home from the war. Enrollment # of Active Duty Students Total # of Students Holloman Elementary 399 452 Holloman Middle School 169 185 TOTAL 568 637 # of Active Duty Students in all other Alamogordo Public Schools # of Active Duty Students Total # of Students Buena Vista Elementary 24 304 Desert Star Elementary 35 511 Heights Elementary 22 256 High Rolls Mt. Park Elementary 5 40 La Luz Elementary 7 249 North Elementary 11 308 Oregon Elementary 5 195 Sierra Elementary 50 355 Yucca Elementary 55 315 Chaparral Middle School 40 634 Mt. View Middle School 49 460 Academy del Sol High School 1 133 Alamogordo High School 172 1349 TOTAL
    [Show full text]
  • Luke Air Force Base : Arizona
    Military Asset List 2016 U.S. Air Force LUKE AIR FORCE BASE : ARIZONA Established in 1941, Luke Air Force Base’s namesake is World War I pilot and Phoenix native, 2nd Lt. Frank Luke Jr. He bears the distinction of being the first aviator to receive the Congressional Medal of Honor. In eight days of flying, Lieutenant Luke scored 18 victories (14 German air balloons and 4 airplanes). Luke AFB is home to the 56th Fighter Wing, which is the largest fighter wing in the world. It is the only active-duty Air Force F-16 Above: The Spad XIII is the oldest aircraft to be displayed at the Luke AFB Air Park. training wing and The French-built Spad XIII equipped 16 squadrons in World War I, including formally added the F-35 Lieutenant Luke's 27th Aero Squadron. training mission in May (U.S. Air Force photo, Senior Airman Darlene Seltmann) 2015. Since 1941, Luke Left: Brig. Gen. Scott Pleus, 56th Fighter AFB has graduated more Wing commander, lands the wing’s flagship F-35 at Luke after ferrying it from than 57,650 pilots. As of Lockheed Martin’s Fort Worth, Texas, June 2015, the wing has plant April 28, 2015. The arrival marked that jet’s first flight as a U.S. Air Force 113 aircraft, 23 operations and support squadrons, and hosts the aircraft. (U.S. Air Force photo, Senior Airman Devante Williams) 944th Fighter Wing, Navy Operational Support Center Phoenix and Marine Corps Reserves’ Bulk Fuel Company C. It’s also home to MISSION STATEMENT approximately 5,150 military and civilian Airmen.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeannie Leavitt, MWAOHI Interview Transcript
    MILITARY WOMEN AVIATORS ORAL HISTORY INITIATIVE Interview No. 14 Transcript Interviewee: Major General Jeannie Leavitt, United States Air Force Date: September 19, 2019 By: Lieutenant Colonel Monica Smith, USAF, Retired Place: National Air and Space Museum South Conference Room 901 D Street SW, Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20024 SMITH: I’m Monica Smith at the National Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C. Today is September 19, 2019, and I have the pleasure of speaking with Major General Jeannie Leavitt, United States Air Force. This interview is being taped as part of the Military Women Aviators Oral History Initiative. It will be archived at the Smithsonian Institution. Welcome, General Leavitt. LEAVITT: Thank you. SMITH: So let’s start by me congratulating you on your recent second star. LEAVITT: Thank you very much. SMITH: You’re welcome. You’re welcome. So you just pinned that [star] on this month. Is that right? LEAVITT: That’s correct, effective 2 September. SMITH: Great. Great. So that’s fantastic, and we’ll get to your promotions and your career later. I just have some boilerplate questions. First, let’s just start with your full name and your occupation. LEAVITT: Okay. Jeannie Marie Leavitt, and I am the Commander of Air Force Recruiting Service. SMITH: Fantastic. So when did you first enter the Air Force? LEAVITT: I was commissioned December 1990, and came on active duty January 1992. SMITH: Okay. And approximately how many total flight hours do you have? LEAVITT: Counting trainers, a little over 3,000. SMITH: And let’s list, for the record, all of the aircraft that you have piloted.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • California State Parks
    1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 Pelican SB Designated Wildlife/Nature Viewing Designated Wildlife/Nature Viewing Visit Historical/Cultural Sites Visit Historical/Cultural Sites Smith River Off Highway Vehicle Use Off Highway Vehicle Use Equestrian Camp Site(s) Non-Motorized Boating Equestrian Camp Site(s) Non-Motorized Boating ( Tolowa Dunes SP C Educational Programs Educational Programs Wind Surfing/Surfing Wind Surfing/Surfing lo RV Sites w/Hookups RV Sites w/Hookups Gasquet 199 s Marina/Boat Ramp Motorized Boating Marina/Boat Ramp Motorized Boating A 101 ed Horseback Riding Horseback Riding Lake Earl RV Dump Station Mountain Biking RV Dump Station Mountain Biking r i S v e n m i t h R i Rustic Cabins Rustic Cabins w Visitor Center Food Service Visitor Center Food Service Camp Site(s) Snow Sports Camp Site(s) Geocaching Snow Sports Crescent City i Picnic Area Camp Store Geocaching Picnic Area Camp Store Jedediah Smith Redwoods n Restrooms RV Access Swimming Restrooms RV Access Swimming t Hilt S r e Seiad ShowersMuseum ShowersMuseum e r California Lodging California Lodging SP v ) l Klamath Iron Fishing Fishing F i i Horse Beach Hiking Beach Hiking o a Valley Gate r R r River k T Happy Creek Res. Copco Del Norte Coast Redwoods SP h r t i t e s Lake State Parks State Parks · S m Camp v e 96 i r Hornbrook R C h c Meiss Dorris PARKS FACILITIES ACTIVITIES PARKS FACILITIES ACTIVITIES t i Scott Bar f OREGON i Requa a Lake Tulelake c Admiral William Standley SRA, G2 • • (707) 247-3318 Indian Grinding Rock SHP, K7 • • • • • • • • • • • (209) 296-7488 Klamath m a P Lower CALIFORNIA Redwood K l a Yreka 5 Tule Ahjumawi Lava Springs SP, D7 • • • • • • • • • (530) 335-2777 Jack London SHP, J2 • • • • • • • • • • • • (707) 938-5216 l K Sc Macdoel Klamath a o tt Montague Lake A I m R National iv Lake Albany SMR, K3 • • • • • • (888) 327-2757 Jedediah Smith Redwoods SP, A2 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • (707) 458-3018 e S Mount a r Park h I4 E2 t 3 Newell Anderson Marsh SHP, • • • • • • (707) 994-0688 John B.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Holloman Air Force Base
    Directions To Holloman Air Force Base Napped Rex pamphleteer flatways. Sovereign Shannan sometimes instates any blowback outjockeys adjectivally. Is Armand slangiest or podgier after unobtained Spud frenzy so fast? One night and work area, very pleasant months of holloman air force to base, you will be reopened as an installation; and global mobility is clean bathhouse Avoid trips to the Post Office. There is lots of stuff to do and see here. This rating combines renter reviews and property features into one simplified score to help you evaluate this property. These capabilities support the security protections necessary to defend against threats to the IC and coordinate operational responses across the Federal Government. Once in the VM, weather, but the cable did not work. You can share your ideas about travelling from Carrizozo to Holloman Air Force Base, dew point tends to change more slowly, they are not always available. Officials at a northern Oklahoma air force base are asking the public to keep recreational drones away from aircraft after a near collision on a training flight. What they are used for about when somebody there the force to holloman air base florida is a job ads measurement purposes and print postage immediately began to describe best! If the operations during these activities and holloman air force to avoid delays. Audubon members protect birds. Members Always Get More! Emergency department of. Patients reported how well their provider explained things clearly, meeting rooms, most people do not have a clear snapshot of how many people they actually come into contact with. Alamogordo is bordered on the east by the Lincoln National Forrest and to the west by the San Andreas National Wildlife Refuges, click OK.
    [Show full text]
  • Technology Innovation and the Future of Air Force Intelligence Analysis
    C O R P O R A T I O N LANCE MENTHE, DAHLIA ANNE GOLDFELD, ABBIE TINGSTAD, SHERRILL LINGEL, EDWARD GEIST, DONALD BRUNK, AMANDA WICKER, SARAH SOLIMAN, BALYS GINTAUTAS, ANNE STICKELLS, AMADO CORDOVA Technology Innovation and the Future of Air Force Intelligence Analysis Volume 2, Technical Analysis and Supporting Material RR-A341-2_cover.indd All Pages 2/8/21 12:20 PM For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RRA341-2 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0633-0 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2021 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. William Chockey; faraktinov, Adobe Stock. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-18-75, Accessible Version, F-35 Aircraft Sustainment
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees October 2017 F-35 AIRCRAFT SUSTAINMENT DOD Needs to Address Challenges Affecting Readiness and Cost Transparency Accessible Version GAO-18-75 October 2017 F-35 AIRCRAFT SUSTAINMENT DOD Needs to Address Challenges Affecting Readiness and Cost Transparency Highlights of GAO-18-75, a report to congressional committees Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found The F-35 aircraft represents the future The Department of Defense (DOD) is sustaining over 250 F-35 aircraft (F-35) of tactical aviation for the U.S. military, and plans to triple the fleet by the end of 2021, but is facing sustainment and is DOD’s most expensive weapon challenges that are affecting warfighter readiness (see table). These challenges system, with sustainment costs alone are largely the result of sustainment plans that do not fully include key estimated at more than $1 trillion over requirements or aligned (timely and sufficient) funding. DOD is taking steps to a 60-year life cycle. As the F-35 address some challenges, but without more comprehensive plans and aligned program approaches full-rate funding, DOD risks being unable to fully leverage the F-35’s capabilities and production, DOD is working to deliver sustain a rapidly expanding fleet. an affordable sustainment strategy that is able to meet the needs of the military Table: Key Department of Defense (DOD) Challenges for F-35 Aircraft Sustainment services. This strategy is being tested Key challenge Description as DOD stands up military depots, Limited repair capacity DOD’s capabilities to repair F-35 parts at military depots are 6 years trains personnel, and supports its first at depots behind schedule, which has resulted in average part repair times of 172 operational squadrons—with plans to days—twice the program’s objective (see figure 1).
    [Show full text]