DOCSLIB.ORG

The Hybrid, Fuel, and Vehicle Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Hybrid, Fuel, and Vehicle Report ISSN 1946-1011 The Hybrid Vehicle and Alternative Fuel Report June 15, 2013 This report is a summary of articles appearing in popular, business, and technical media referring to the impact of fuel costs and fuel efficiency on vehicle technology, development, and markets. At the end of the report is a list of all articles summarized, with hyperlinks to internet sources where available. Some hyperlinks may require free registration or paid subscriptions to access. The Hybrid Vehicle and Alternative Fuel Report (ISSN: 1946-1011) is compiled by Thomas L. R. Smith, Ph. D., Economic Analysis Branch of the Budget and Financial Analysis Division, Washington State Department of Transportation. Contact the editor at [email protected] or (360) 705-7941. Contributions of articles and positive comments about The Report are welcome. TABLE OF CONTENTS HYBRIDS .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 ELECTRIC VEHICLES....................................................................................................................................................................... 2 ALTERNATIVE FUELS ...................................................................................................................................................................... 5 COMING TO A LOCATION NEAR YOU ......................................................................................................................................... 5 OTHER TECHNOLOGY ..................................................................................................................................................................... 6 SUBSCRIBING TO The Hybrid Report. .............................................................................................................................................. 7 ARTICLES REFERENCED ................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Notice to Subscribers: Due to the editorial staff’s vacation on Tybee Island, Georgia, there will not be a June 30th edition of The Hybrid Report. We’ll see you on July 15, 2013. “So long, it’s been good to know yuh:”1 Dan Sheppard, long time Hybrid Report subscriber and frequent contributor, retires from State service at the end of this month. We wish Dan well in the next chapter of his life. In addition to his frequent contributions of articles to The Report, Dan filled in as copy editor from time to time. Dan was also the first person to write a letter of complaint to The Report (in our eight years, we’ve had two). On the occasion of our first use of the plural “Prii,” Dan’s letter said, in its entirety, “Aaargh.” Because of his contributions, he was designated as one of our first Honorary Acting Assistant Editors. Upon his retirement, we promote Dan Sheppard to Assistant Editor, Emeritus. National Hybrid and Plug-in Sales Data for May 2013: May was a good month for hybrid sales, nationally, while the news was mixed for electric vehicles. HybridCars.com and Baum & Associates (Cobb, June 4, 2013) report that even though May was a good month for the auto industry, hybrids still outperformed the market. Overall, auto sales were up 12.3% over April and 8% over May 2012, while hybrids were up 14% and 31.2% for the same periods. Hybrids accounted for 3.4% of the automotive market. Toyota and Prius still dominate the hybrid market with four of the top five hybrids. While sales of Ford’s most popular hybrid, the Fusion, dropped in May from the previous month, Ford has sold more hybrids in the first five months of 2013 than it sold all of last year. Plug-in sales were up 8.6% in May over April; however, this was lower than the auto market as a whole. The Nissan Leaf was the sales leader at 2,138, pushing the Tesla Model S out of the number one spot it has enjoyed for several months. Electric cars account for just over ½ of 1% of the total car market. 1 Woody Guthrie, “So Long, It’s Been Good To Know Yuh (Dusty Old Dust)” TRO-Ludlow Music, Inc (BMI), 1940, 1951. 1 © 2013 Washington State Department of Transportation The Hybrid Vehicle and Alternative Fuel Report ISSN 1946-1011 June 15, 2013 2 HYBRIDS Toyota is planning to build hybrid car battery plants in China to support the development of hybrid cars Toyota plans to sell in that country, Reuters (May 30, 2013) reports. Toyota is involved in two separate joint ventures with Chinese firms to produce hybrid cars. This is a significant turn of events because, until recently, the Chinese government was not interested in hybrids, but had concentrated on development of fully- electric vehicles in its bid to reduce fossil fuel consumption. The City of New York plans to spend $500 million to give itself “the greenest fleet in the country,” Fleet Owner quotes Keith Kerman (Mele, May 31, 2013), NYC’s chief fleet management officer. The city plans to replace vehicles in the Fire, Police, and Sanitation Departments with 1,000 hybrid or electric vehicles. The city will replace refuse trucks with 20 Compressed Natural Gas vehicles, and the parks department will get 60 Ford and Nissan plug-in vehicles. The latest entry into the hybrid car market is Ferrari’s new LaFerrari, Greener Ideal (Turberville-Tully, May 31, 2013) says. The car, introduced at the Geneva Autoshow, will sell for just $1.3 million. The car is limited to 499 buyers. Prospective buyers must already own at least two Ferraris. The driver’s seat of the custom made car will be custom-molded to the owners “shape.” LaFerrari will be the fastest Ferrari ever built. Critics of hybrid and electric cars often talk about the “hybrid premium” and how long it takes to payback the premium. The Chicago Tribune (Undercoffler, June 6, 2013) and Edmunds.com have developed another metric to use when trying to decide if it’s worth paying extra for a hybrid car: price per miles per gallon. You take the car’s price and divide by the EPA’s mpg rating. Using this measure, the cheapest car per miles per gallon is the Ford C-Max Energi at $329.50 per mpg. Next, is the Prius plug-in at $336.84 per mpg. The Smart fortwo is the cheapest non-hybrid and registers third on the list. Lightning Hybrids and National Fleet Hybrids will join up to provide hydraulic hybrid conversion kits to fleet operators of shuttle buses and medium duty delivery trucks, Fleet Owner (June 11, 2013) says. Lightning Hybrid does conversions for fleets in the Rocky Mountain States and the West, while National Fleet Hybrids will offer Lightning Hybrids’ hydraulic conversions to the East Coast. ELECTRIC VEHICLES The second annual BC2BC Electric Vehicle Rally and International Golden Plug Ceremony are scheduled for June 29, 2013 at the Peace Arch State Park, 19 A Street in Blaine, Washington. The BC2BC (for British Columbia to Baja California) is a road rally © 2013 Washington State Department of Transportation The Hybrid Vehicle and Alternative Fuel Report ISSN 1946-1011 June 15, 2013 3 for electric cars that goes from the border between the Canada and the United States to the border between the United States and Mexico. Public events and festivities are scheduled from 10:00 am to 1:00 pm, while the Golden Plug Ceremony is scheduled for 11:00 am to noon. For more information see the All Electric Vehicle Rally website at http://www.allelectricvehiclerally.org/ where you register, sponsor the event, or donate. The rally is supported by the Washington State Department of Transportation, the States of Oregon and California, the Province of British Columbia, and several private organizations. Tesla, which only has one model of car for sale, plans to introduce several more over the next few years, Automotive News (Lienert, May 30, 2013) says. The first vehicle is the Model X crossover that will hit showroom floors in 2014. Tesla has two more vehicles coming out later. One is a small sedan, priced around $30,000, while the other is another crossover, smaller and cheaper than the Model X. Possibly more frustrating than finding a charging station, is finding one that is part of the network you subscribe to, Bloomberg Businessweek (Doom, May 30, 2013) speculates. There are 15,000 charging stations operated by several major networks and a plethora of private operators. Many of these required their own RFID cards to use the station, forcing many drivers to subscribe to several systems. Ecotality and ChargePoint plan to establish a joint service which will give subscribers access to 90% of the chargers in the U. S. A lucky group of 100 residents of Scotland will be able to use a Nissan Leaf for a mere £100 (about $155) per month for 18 months, Wired UK (Dow, June 5, 2013) wired. The deal is part of a trial called My Electric Avenue, put together by EA Technology and Scottish and Southern Energy Power Distribution to see the impact electric vehicles will have on the Scot power grid. Customers of the bankrupt firm Better Place rallied in Tel Aviv’s Hayarkron Park to promote a plan to keep the company’s battery swapping facilities open past the planned shut-down date of June 13, The Jerusalem Post (Udasin, June 8, 2013) posted. The Association for Electric Transportation Advancement, the car owner group, is trying to get all of Better Place’s customers to join a cooperative to take over the swapping stations. Meanwhile, Israel’s solar-power developer Captain Sunshine, Yosef Abramowitz, is putting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Electric Vehicle Pre-Infrastructure Planning a Discussion of Social, Economic, and Technological Readiness of Prince Edward Island
    University of Prince Edward Island Electric Vehicle Pre-Infrastructure Planning A Discussion of Social, Economic, and Technological Readiness of Prince Edward Island Georgina Vardy 10/22/2012 A localized study, focused on Prince Edward Island, Canada, compiled to assist with determining social, economic and technological readiness for electric vehicles and the related infrastructure. The study used both a Christensen based disruptive technology framework approach and traditional marketing techniques to determine social and economic readiness. Residents showed an interest and aptitude for the social changes required however the financial affordability of the electric vehicles for residents was limited without nationally available, but locally deficient, incentives. A technology scan determined that electric vehicle battery chemical content and design are determining factors in effectively satisfying social needs and acceptance. The next stage includes localized marketing development for this unique location, vehicles sales and infrastructure. PERMISSION TO USE SIGNATURE PROJECT REPORT Title of Signature Project: Electric Vehicle Pre-Infrastructure Planning: A Discussion of Social, Economic, and Technological Readiness of Prince Edward Island Name of Author: Georgina Vardy Department: School of Business Degree: Master of Business Administration Year: 2012 Name of Supervisor(s): Tim Carroll In presenting this signature project report in partial fulfilment of the requirements for a Master of Business Administration degree from the University of Prince Edward Island, the author has agreed that the Robertson Library, University of Prince Edward Island, may make this signature project freely available for inspection and gives permission to add an electronic version of the signature project to the Digital Repository at the University of Prince Edward Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Comment 1 for ZEV 2008 (Zev2008) - 45 Day
    Comment 1 for ZEV 2008 (zev2008) - 45 Day. First Name: Jim Last Name: Stack Email Address: [email protected] Affiliation: Subject: ZEV vehicles Comment: The only true ZEV vehicles are pure electric that chanrge on renewables Today 96% of the hydrogen is made from fossil fuels. This can be improved on but will take a long time. Today we already have very good Electric Vehicles liek the RAV4 with NiMH batteries that have lasted over 100,000 miles. Too bad Toyota stopped making it. We also have the Tesla and Ebox. Please do what is right. Jim Attachment: Original File Name: Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2008-02-16 11:19:59 No Duplicates. Comment 2 for ZEV 2008 (zev2008) - 45 Day. First Name: Star Last Name: Irvine Email Address: [email protected] Affiliation: NEV Owner Subject: MSV in ZEV regulations Comment: I as a NEV owner (use my OKA NEV ZEV about 3,000 miles annually) would like to see MSV (Medium Speed Vehicles) included in ZEV mandate so they can be available in California. I own two other vehicles FORD FOCUS and FORD Crown Vic. I my OKA NEV could go 35 MPH I would drive it at least twice as much as I currently do, and I would feel much safer doing so. 25 MPH top speed for NEV seriously limits its use and practicality for every day commuting. Attachment: Original File Name: Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2008-02-19 23:07:01 No Duplicates. Comment 3 for ZEV 2008 (zev2008) - 45 Day. First Name: Miro Last Name: Kefurt Email Address: [email protected] Affiliation: OKA AUTO USA Subject: MSV definition and inclusion in ZEV 2008 Comment: We believe that it is important that the ZEV regulations should be more specific in definition of "CITY" ZEV as to its capabilities and equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Bringing the Auto Industry, U.S. Government and Car Consumers
    WANADA Bulletin # 4-10 *** 2010 Washington Auto Show Special Issue February 1, 2010 Headlines… 2010 WAS: The Future of the Automobile in Society The Washington Auto Show “is important to Ford because of the constituents here,” says CEO Mulally EPA Administrator Opens Advanced Technology SuperHighway Energy Secretary Chu Announces $1.4 Billion Loan to Nissan Read The Green Car Summit on Capitol Hill Congress Joins WAS Public Policy Day The Daily Bulletin coverage “Sneak Peek” Reception and Preview Draws a “Capitol” Crowd of the Auto Show, Jan. 25-29 WANADA Member Briefing, Chrysler, GM & the Industry Turmoil Student Day at the Auto Show: An Educational Experience here 06/08/2009 Ralph Nader Recognized by Keith Crain/Automotive News EDTA and SAE International Hold Joint Plenary Session at The 2010 Washington Auto Show Thought for the Week… The 2010 Washington Auto Show: Bringing the Auto Industry, U.S. Government and Car Consumers Together on the Future of the Automobile in Society The 2010 Washington Auto Show (WAS) and its organizers achieved what they set out to do on Public Policy Days, Jan 25-26, in bring ing together the key public and private sector players who will decide how the auto industry will evolve in the years ahead. They also successfully assembled a show floor exposition that vividly displayed its direction, particularly within the Advanced Technology SuperHighway, the show’s signature pavilion. Those attending Public Policy Days included leading industry executives, federal officials, congressmen, local elected representatives and affiliated auto industry associations. Together they produced one of the most meaningful public policy forums in the show’s history.
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho Power Plan, Nov 1 2019
    LISA D. NORDSTROM Lead Counsel [email protected] November 1, 2019 Public Utility Commission of Oregon Filing Center 201 High Street SE, Suite 100 P.O. Box 1088 Salem, Oregon 97301 RE: UM ___ – Idaho Power Company’s Application for Transportation Electrification Plan Attention Filing Center: Pursuant to OAR 860-087-0020, Idaho Power Company (“Idaho Power” or “Company”) submits the enclosed Transportation Electrification Plan (“TE Plan”) for acceptance by the Public Utility Commission of Oregon (“Commission”). Idaho Power’s TE Plan contains the Company’s long-term strategy to accelerate TE in its Oregon service area. Given the current state of the TE market in Idaho Power’s Oregon service area, the Company’s TE Plan is largely focused on improving the visibility and awareness of electric vehicles (“EV”). Through education and awareness, Idaho Power aims to accelerate TE by contributing to increased adoption of EVs, and access to electricity as a form of transportation fuel. Idaho Power respectfully requests that the Commission issue an order finding that the Company’s TE Plan meets the requirements of OAR 860-087-0020. The Company also requests that the Commission waive (per OAR 860-087-0001) OAR 860-087-0020(2)(d), which requires Idaho Power to present its TE Plan at a public meeting, if the Commission finds that presentation of the Company’s modest TE Plan, reflecting the limited EV penetration in its Oregon service area, would not materially benefit the Commission. It is respectfully requested that all formal data requests to the Company regarding this filing be addressed to the following: By email (preferred): [email protected] By regular mail: Lisa Nordstrom Lead Counsel Idaho Power Company 1221 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 32 VEHICLE RECALLS by MANUFACTURER, 2000 Report Prepared 1/16/2008
    Page 1 of 32 VEHICLE RECALLS BY MANUFACTURER, 2000 Report Prepared 1/16/2008 MANUFACTURER RECALLS VEHICLES ACCUBUIL T, INC 1 8 AM GENERAL CORPORATION 1 980 AMERICAN EAGLE MOTORCYCLE CO 1 14 AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO 8 212,212 AMERICAN SUNDIRO MOTORCYCLE 1 2,183 AMERICAN SUZUKI MOTOR CORP. 4 25,023 AMERICAN TRANSPORTATION CORP. 5 1,441 APRILIA USA INC. 2 409 ASTON MARTIN 2 666 ATHEY PRODUCTS CORP. 3 304 B. FOSTER & COMPANY, INC. 1 422 BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE 11 28,738 BLUE BIRD BODY COMPANY 12 62,692 BUELL MOTORCYCLE CO 4 12,230 CABOT COACH BUILDERS, INC. 1 818 CARPENTER INDUSTRIES, INC. 2 6,838 CLASSIC LIMOUSINE 1 492 CLASSIC MANUFACTURING, INC. 1 8 COACHMEN INDUSTRIES, INC. 8 5,271 COACHMEN RV COMPANY 1 576 COLLINS BUS CORPORATION 1 286 COUNTRY COACH INC 6 519 CRANE CARRIER COMPANY 1 138 DABRYAN COACH BUILDERS 1 723 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION 30 6,700,752 DAMON CORPORATION 3 824 DAVINCI COACHWORKS, INC 1 144 D'ELEGANT CONVERSIONS, INC. 1 34 DORSEY TRAILERS, INC. 1 210 DUTCHMEN MANUFACTURING, INC 1 105 ELDORADO NATIONAL 1 173 ELECTRIC TRANSIT, INC. 1 54 ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY 1 40 E-ONE, INC. 1 3 EUROPA INTERNATIONAL, INC. 2 242 EXECUTIVE COACH BUILDERS 1 702 FEATHERLITE LUXURY COACHES 1 83 FEATHERLITE, INC. 2 3,235 FEDERAL COACH, LLC 1 230 FERRARI NORTH AMERICA 8 1,601 FLEETWOOD ENT., INC. 5 12, 119 FORD MOTOR COMPANY 60 7,485,466 FOREST RIVER, INC. 1 115 FORETRAVEL, INC. 3 478 FOURWINNS 2 2,276 FREIGHTLINER CORPORATION 27 233,032 FREIGHTLINER LLC 1 803 GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Vehicle Infrastructure for the Monterey Bay Area the Associa on of Monterey Bay Area Governments August 2013
    E V Electric Vehicle Infrastructure for the Monterey Bay Area The Associa on of Monterey Bay Area Governments August 2013 The prepara on of this document was funded by a grant awarded by the Monterey Bay Unifi ed Air Pollu on Control District (MUAPCD), as part of the AB2766 program. Project Staff Alan Romero, Monterey Bay Unifi ed Air Pollu on Control District (MBUAPCD) AMBAG Dawn Mathes, Monterey County Resource Management Agency (RMA) Paul Hierling, Planner Carl P. Holm, Monterey County RMA Cody Meyer, Planner Craig Spencer, Monterey County RMA Anais Schenk, Planner Mario Salazar, Monterey County RMA Jason Adelaars, GIS Michael Ricker, City of Salinas Ecology Ac on Veronica Lezama, San Benito Council of Piet Canin, Vice President, Transporta on Governments Group Tegan Speiser, Santa Cruz County RTC Emily Glanville, Program Specialist Michael Zeller, TAMC Monterey Bay Unifi ed Air James Wasserman, Zero Motorcycles, Plug- Pollu on Control District In America Alan Romero, Air Quality Planner III Megan Tolbert, CSU Monterey Bay EV Communi es Alliance Piet Canin, Ecology Ac on Richard Corcoran, PEV Owner Richard Schorske, CEO Teresa Buika, UC Santa Cruz Previous staff contributors Richard Schorske, EV Communi es Alliance John Doughty Randy Deshazo, Principal Planner Linda Meckel, Planner, Project Manager MBEVA Plug-In Electric Vehicle Coordina ng Council Sharon Sarris, Green Fuse Energy Kris Markey, Offi ce of Monterey County Supervisor Parker Andy Hartmann, Interna onal Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Cheryl Schmi , City of Santa Cruz For more informa on regarding this study, contact Anais Schenk at [email protected] 2 E V Electric Vehicle Infrastructure for the Monterey Bay Area Execu ve Summary..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Vehicle Charging Study
    DriveOhio Team Patrick Smith, Interim Director Luke Stedke, Managing Director, Communications Julie Brogan, Project Manager Authors Katie Ott Zehnder, HNTB Sam Spofforth, Clean Fuels Ohio Scott Lowry, HNTB Andrew Conley, Clean Fuels Ohio Santos Ramos, HNTB Cover Photograph By Bruce Hull of the FRA-70-14.56 (Project 2G) ODOT roadway project in coordination with which the City of Columbus, through a competitive bid, hired GreenSpot to install a DCFC on Fulton Street immediately off I-70/I-71 and adjacent to the Columbus Downtown High School property between Fourth Street and Fifth Street. Funding support for the electric vehicle DCFC was provided by AEP Ohio and Paul G. Allen Family Foundation. Table of Contents List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................................... v Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Charging Location Recommendations................................................................................................................................................... 1 Cost Estimate ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Next Steps ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2.3 Car Sharing and End of Life Vehicles
    Ref. Ares(2018)4965112 - 27/09/2018 Research and Innovation action H2020-MG-2016-2017 Review of the Impacts on the Automotive Industry Deliverable D3.3 Version n° 1 Authors: Peter Wells (CU), Haokun Liu (CU), Stefano Beccaria (GM) www.stars-h2020.eu This project has received funding from the Horizon 2020 programme under the grant agreement n°769513 The growth of car sharing in a business as usual scenario DISCLAIMER The content of this deliverable reflect only the author’s view. The European Commission and INEA are not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains. GA n°769513 Page 2 of 61 The growth of car sharing in a business as usual scenario Document Information Grant Agreement 769513 Project Title Shared mobility opporTunities And challenges foR European citieS Project Acronym STARS Project Start Date 01 October 2017 Related work package WP 3 – Business model innovation to enable car sharing Related task(s) Task 3.3 – Review of the impacts on the automotive industry Lead Organisation CU Submission date 30 September 2018 Dissemination Level Public History Date Submitted by Reviewed by Version (Notes) 31 August Cristian Peter Wells (CU) First preliminary version (full deliverable) 2018 Santibanez (LGI) 8 September Peter Wells (CU) Ben Waller (ICDP) Second full deliverable version 2018 Andrea Chicco 25 September Peter Wells (CU) (POLITO), Marco Formatting adjustments and last revision 2018 Diana (POLITO) 27 September Marco Diana Submission of the final Deliverable 3.3 2018 (POLITO) GA n°769513 Page 3 of 61 The growth of car sharing in a business as usual scenario Table of contents SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Advanced Vehicle Technology Analysis and Evaluation Activities
    annual progress report 2008V EHICLE T ECHNOLOGIES P ROGRAM ADVANCED VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION ACTIVITIES AND HEAVY VEHICLE SYSTEMS OPTIMIZATION PROGRAM A Strong Energy Portfolio for a Strong America Energy efficiency and clean, renewable energy will mean a stronger economy, a cleaner environment, and greater energy independence for America. Working with a wide array of state, community, industry, and university partners, the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy invests in a diverse portfolio of energy technologies. For more information contact: EERE Information Center 1-877-EERE-INF (1-877-337-3463) www.eere.energy.gov U.S. Department of Energy Vehicle Technologies Program 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20585-0121 FY 2008 Annual Progress Report for Advanced Vehicle Technology Analysis and Evaluation Activities and Heavy Vehicle Systems Optimization Program Submitted to: U.S. Department of Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Vehicle Technologies Program Advanced Vehicle Technology Analysis and Evaluation Lee Slezak, Technology Manager FY 2008 Annual Report AVTAE Activities & HVSO Program ii AVTAE Activities & HVSO Program FY 2008 Annual Report CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................1 II. MODELING AND SIMULATION....................................................................................................9 A. PSAT Model Validation ...............................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • H:\My Documents\Article.Wpd
    Vehicle Data Codes as of 1/26/2010 Press CTRL + F to prompt the search field. VEHICLE DATA CODES TABLE OF CONTENTS 1--LICENSE PLATE TYPE (LIT) FIELD CODES 1.1 LIT FIELD CODES FOR REGULAR PASSENGER AUTOMOBILE PLATES 1.2 LIT FIELD CODES FOR AIRCRAFT 1.3 LIT FIELD CODES FOR ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES AND SNOWMOBILES 1.4 SPECIAL LICENSE PLATES 1.5 LIT FIELD CODES FOR SPECIAL LICENSE PLATES 2--VEHICLE MAKE (VMA) AND BRAND NAME (BRA) FIELD CODES 2.1 VMA AND BRA FIELD CODES 2.2 VMA, BRA, AND VMO FIELD CODES FOR AUTOMOBILES, LIGHT-DUTY VANS, LIGHT- DUTY TRUCKS, AND PARTS 2.3 VMA AND BRA FIELD CODES FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT PARTS 2.4 VMA AND BRA FIELD CODES FOR FARM AND GARDEN EQUIPMENT AND FARM EQUIPMENT PARTS 2.5 VMA AND BRA FIELD CODES FOR MOTORCYCLES AND MOTORCYCLE PARTS 2.6 VMA AND BRA FIELD CODES FOR SNOWMOBILES AND SNOWMOBILE PARTS 2.7 VMA AND BRA FIELD CODES FOR TRAILERS AND TRAILER PARTS 2.8 VMA AND BRA FIELD CODES FOR TRUCKS AND TRUCK PARTS 2.9 VMA AND BRA FIELD CODES ALPHABETICALLY BY CODE 3--VEHICLE MODEL (VMO) FIELD CODES 3.1 VMO FIELD CODES FOR AUTOMOBILES, LIGHT-DUTY VANS, AND LIGHT-DUTY TRUCKS 3.2 VMO FIELD CODES FOR ASSEMBLED VEHICLES 3.3 VMO FIELD CODES FOR AIRCRAFT 3.4 VMO FIELD CODES FOR ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES 3.5 VMO FIELD CODES FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 3.6 VMO FIELD CODES FOR DUNE BUGGIES 3.7 VMO FIELD CODES FOR FARM AND GARDEN EQUIPMENT 3.8 VMO FIELD CODES FOR GO-CARTS 3.9 VMO FIELD CODES FOR GOLF CARTS 3.10 VMO FIELD CODES FOR MOTORIZED RIDE-ON TOYS 3.11 VMO FIELD CODES FOR MOTORIZED WHEELCHAIRS 3.12
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Vehicle Life Cycle Cost Analysis
    Electric Vehicle Life Cycle Cost Analysis Richard Raustad Electric Vehicle Transportation Center Florida Solar Energy Center 1679 Clearlake Road Cocoa, FL 32922-5703 [email protected] Submitted as: Final Research Project Report EVTC Project 6 – Electric Vehicle Life Cycle Cost Analysis Submitted to: Ms. Denise Dunn Research and Innovative Technology Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 E-mail: [email protected] Contract Number: DTRT13-G-UTC51 EVTC Report Number: FSEC-CR-2053-17 February 2017 The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s University Transportation Centers Program in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. 1 Acknowledgements This report is a final research report for the Electric Vehicle Life Cycle Cost Analysis project of the Electric Vehicle Transportation Center (EVTC) at the University of Central Florida (UCF). The Electric Vehicle Transportation Center is a University Transportation Center funded by the Research and Innovative Technology Administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation. The EVTC is a research and education center whose projects prepare the U.S. transportation system for the influx of electric vehicles into a sustainable transportation network and investigate the opportunity these vehicles present to enhance electric grid modernization efforts. The EVTC is led by UCF's Florida Solar Energy Center partners from UCF’s Departments of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and Civil, Environmental and Construction Engineering, the University of Hawaii, and Tuskegee University.
    [Show full text]
  • Minimum Sound Requirements for Hybrid and Electric Vehicles FMVSS 141
    Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis Minimum Sound Requirements for Hybrid and Electric Vehicles FMVSS 141 Office of Regulatory Analysis and Evaluation National Center for Statistics and Analysis January 2013 Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... i System Effectiveness ...................................................................................................... ii Costs ............................................................................................................................... ii Benefits .......................................................................................................................... iii Net Impact [Pedestrians and Pedalcyclists Combined] ................................................. iv Cost Effectiveness ......................................................................................................... iv I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 II. Research and Proposal ............................................................................................................. 4 NHTSA’s Proposal ....................................................................................................... 17 III. Alternatives ........................................................................................................................... 24 Requiring
    [Show full text]