Concept of Space Suit Enclosure for Planetary Exploration

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Concept of Space Suit Enclosure for Planetary Exploration 2001-01-2168 Concept of Space Suit Enclosure for Planetary Exploration I. Abramov, N. Moiseyev and A. Stoklitsky RD&PE Zvezda Copyright © 2001 Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc. Abstract and bearings are possible. If we compare the PSS and orbital EVA space suit operational environments, additional factors, At present advanced projects of the early XXI century are which influence the PSS design are evident; e.g., gravity is a beginning to develop. These projects include lunar base considerable influence on the PSS enclosure including the development and manned missions to Mars. The space suit is lower torso assembly joints and bearings. The PSS weight one of the basic requirements for successful implementation of limitation makes us trade off between mass and mobility. Use future programs. The space suit enclosure enables mobility of of many bearings to provide maximum mobility at minimum crewmembers wearing pressurized space suits which will be effort may result in increasing the suit weight and dimensions required to complete these missions. and complicate suit operations. Compromise versions combining joints and smaller numbers of bearings, are Requirements on Planetary Space Suit (PSS) enclosure design, possible. especially for elements providing mobility of the lower torso assembly will be different from these on orbital space suit Hereafter, in analyzing the enclosure concept, the authors take enclosure design, intended for zero gravity conditions. into account the experience obtained in development of both the Lunar space suits (US A7LB and RF "Krechet") and The PSS enclosure provides cosmonaut/astronaut movement orbital space suits (US EMU and RF "Orlan") as well as test on planetary exploration surfaces, ascent/descent of the results for the latest development of space suits. Landing Module ladder, suited crewmember’s bending etc. Thus this PSS component will play a considerable role in Selecting the PSS enclosure design concept, the authors first successful fulfillment of extra-vehicular activity (EVA) tasks of all take into account the provision of such factors as: on planetary surfaces. - Minimal mass, - Range of motion, necessary for the planetary The paper comprises the following: exploration, n Analysis of the specific environmental conditions and - Anthropomorphic (natural) suited crewmember EVA characteristics on the Moon and Mars movements, - Ease of space suit donning/doffing. n Major PSS enclosure requirements n PSS enclosure design concepts analysis n The main purpose of the PSS is to provide for EVA on the PSS lower torso assembly concept for the Moon and Mars planetary surface. The issues of suit enclosure selection are considered here as applied to this purpose. Other possible considerations, usage for EVAs during interplanetary flight Introduction and PSS usage during landing/take-off as an IVA suit have not been addressed. In this connection, the paper pays most Russia and the USA have accumulated great experience in the attention to suit elements providing for walking mobility i.e. development and use of space suits for near-earth orbit EVA suit lower torso assembly (LTA). The influence of life support and for their lunar programs. This experience can be applied to system (LSS) characteristics, robotic devices, etc. on suit development of the next-generation space suit for the Moon enclosure design have not been discussed for brevity. and Mars. To a great extent, the success of these future projects will depend on selection of a PSS type, PSS enclosure concept, which provides for required cosmonaut mobility and Space suit operations on the Moon and Mars. other mission requirements. Table 1 presents some comparative data on environmental As is known, space suit enclosure mobility is provided by conditions, which must be taken into account in developing joints, which serve to bend enclosure elements, and ball and designing the PSS. bearings, which serve to rotate enclosure parts relative to each other. On the suit enclosure, various combinations of joints Table 1. Comparison of environmental conditions # Environmental Condition Near-earth orbit Moon Mars 1 Gravity 0 1.62 m/sec2 (0.17g) 3.91 m/sec2 (0.38g) 2 Pressure 0.0 bar 0.0 bar 6...11 bar 3 Surface temperature range −163...+112°C −163...+112°C −143...+17°C Among the tabulated data for the development of the PSS Performing intensive EVA, comfort provision for the suited enclosure design concept, the gravity environment has the crewmember are of great importance. In order to provide greatest impact. Another important factor is exposure to dust comfort for the crewmember wearing the suit, special soft on the Moon/Mars surfaces. It goes without saying, the suit inserts able to prevent pinching, numbing, chafing, cutting, outer garment – thermal micrometeoroid garment (TMG) will etc. must be included in the PSS enclosure design (thermal be required to protect the PSS enclosure from many dangers comfort requirements are not discussed in this paper). including dust penetration. Special design features are foreseen on the TMG/PSS enclosure to provide for: The Moon/Mars relief is uneven. The LTA design must allow the suited crewmember to stand and move on terrain with - Cleaning dust from the TMG/PSS enclosure different slope angles and to go up and down the ladder of the - Repair or replacement of TMG/PSS enclosure damaged Landing Module or Lunar/Martian base. Sand and loose rocks components. in combination with slopes will be encountered. While walking on uneven terrain, the crewmember may fall and When performing planetary exploration tasks, the suited injure himself. That is why, the protective measures listed crewmember must walk on uneven terrain. The PSS design below will be required in the PSS: must allow the crewmember to stand up after falling and take - Restriction of ankle joint mobility in order to prevent intermediate positions (on all fours, kneeling etc.), necessary dislocation of the crew member’s ankle joint to take the vertical position. The PSS enclosure must also - Use of dedicated pads inside the suit enclosure (e.g. on allow the suited crewmember to take different static postures knees) to take kneeling position without any pain without excessive effort. Moreover, the subject may need to - Use of rigid over-boots toes to prevent injures if the take these positions to complete a set of activities and suited crewmember drops anything on his feet exploratory tasks. This suggests a list of static postures at - Use of soft pads for chin and forehead in the helmet which the PSS joints should be in an equilibrium state (i.e. and/or pads-inserts on the headset. position maintained with little or no effort): - Standing up The PSS design must be coordinated with the mobile - Bending forward transportation system. The PSS design must support use of - Sitting Moon/Mars rovers, on the one hand, but on the other hand, the - On knee(s) Moon/Mars rovers must be designed with the PSS specific - On all fours. features taken into account. For different types of rovers, various means to seat the suited crewmember and provide In the process of planetary exploration, a cosmonaut/astronaut access to the controls are possible. It is also necessary to will be required to retrieve rock samples and the PSS foresee the possibility of the Moon/Mars rovers’ failure enclosure must accommodate this task. In order to reach the resulting in the astronaut/cosmonaut returning to the planet surface with a hand and take a sample of soil/rock, the base/landing module without using of any transportation crewmember must bend forward, squat, or kneel. Each of equipment. In this case, the maximum allowable distance these motions is implemented by interaction of a set of between the Moon/Mars rover and base must be determined, joints/bearings that is a specific feature of the PSS. taking into account the fact that the suited crewmember will have to return to the base on uneven terrain. The necessity to provide easy walking on the planetary surface is another specific requirement for the PSS. It is well known The members of the Martian expedition or lunar base that flexible-soled footwear makes walking easier. The issue occupants will have different anthropometrics and this fact concerning the definition of the degree of flexion of the sole must be kept in mind in developing the PSS design concept. It for the PSS boots must be studied. is necessary to provide PSS enclosure fit sizing over the required anthropometric range and/or selection of the optimal number of the suit component standard sizes. In the case of a lunar base, crew changes may make it desirable to resize the PSS for a significantly different build. This can be where the test subject weight decreases [3]. Under 1/6g, the accomplished if standard sizes of the PSS enclosure test subject posture corresponds to the posture presented in components are replaced by others and/or length readjustment Fig. 1. Under Mars conditions, where the gravitation is 1/3g, is possible. These operations should be easy and should not the joint flexion angles are approximately the same as those on take much time. the Earth for the man in a standing position. During testing in the “lunar” test facility it was also revealed that the suited The lifetime of separate components of the PSS (which will be crewmember’s metabolic rate level decreased when he worn out in the process of PSS operation) and the possibility matched the rate of his locomotion to the frequency of of repairing them are of great importance for these future EVA oscillations of the “man-suit-backpack with LSS” system. missions. The PSS should be designed in such a way as to radically decrease the time for its maintenance/repair. PSS The PSS enclosure construction must allow the suited maintenance/repair should be performed with the help of crewmember to rise/stand up after falling.
Recommended publications
  • Testing of the Z-2 Space Suit at the Neutral Buoyancy Laboratory
    47th International Conference on Environmental Systems ICES-2017-250 16-20 July 2017, Charleston, South Carolina Testing of the Z-2 Space Suit at the Neutral Buoyancy Laboratory Ian M. Meginnis,1 Richard A. Rhodes,2 Kristine N. Larson,3 and Amy J. Ross4 NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, 77058 The Z-2 space suit is the product of the last fifty years of NASA’s space suit research and testing experience. The Z-2 suit was originally developed as an exploration space suit for use on a planetary surface, such as the moon or Mars. However, Z-2 could also be used in microgravity at the International Space Station (ISS) to supplement or replace the existing extravehicular mobility unit (EMU). To evaluate the microgravity performance of Z-2 for compatibility at the ISS, the suit was tested in NASA’s Neutral Buoyancy Laboratory (NBL), which is the primary simulated microgravity testing environment for space suits. Seven test subjects, including five astronauts, performed various tasks that are representative of the tasks performed at the ISS. Test subjects performed tasks in the Z-2 suit and the EMU so that relative comparisons could be drawn between the two suits. Two configurations of the Z-2 space suit were evaluated during this test series: the EMU lower torso assembly (ELTA) configuration and the Z-2 lower torso assembly (ZLTA) configuration. The ELTA configuration, which was the primary test configuration, is comprised of the Z-2 upper torso and the EMU lower torso. The ZLTA configuration is comprised of the Z-2 upper torso and the Z-2 lower torso, which contains additional mobility elements.
    [Show full text]
  • The EVA Spacesuit
    POLITECNICO DI TORINO Repository ISTITUZIONALE Glove Exoskeleton for Extra-Vehicular Activities: Analysis of Requirements and Prototype Design Original Glove Exoskeleton for Extra-Vehicular Activities: Analysis of Requirements and Prototype Design / Favetto, Alain. - (2014). Availability: This version is available at: 11583/2546950 since: Publisher: Politecnico di Torino Published DOI:10.6092/polito/porto/2546950 Terms of use: openAccess This article is made available under terms and conditions as specified in the corresponding bibliographic description in the repository Publisher copyright (Article begins on next page) 04 August 2020 POLITECNICO DI TORINO DOCTORATE SCHOOL Ph. D. In Informatics and Systems – XXV cycle Doctor of Philosophy Thesis Glove Exoskeleton for Extra-Vehicular Activities Analysis of Requirements and Prototype Design (Part One) Favetto Alain Advisor: Coordinator: Prof. Giuseppe Carlo Calafiore Prof. Pietro Laface kp This page is intentionally left blank Dedicato a mio Padre... Al tuo modo ruvido di trasmettere le emozioni. Al tuo senso del dovere ed al tuo altruismo. Ai tuoi modi di fare che da piccolo non capivo e oggi sono parte del mio essere. A tutti i pensieri e le parole che vorrei averti detto e che sono rimasti solo nella mia testa. A te che mi hai sempre trattato come un adulto. A te che te ne sei andato prima che adulto lo potessi diventare davvero. opokp This page is intentionally left blank Index INDEX Index .................................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Balloon Astronaut San Jose, CA 95113 1-408-294-8324 Design Challenge Learning Thetech.Org
    201 S. Market St. Balloon Astronaut San Jose, CA 95113 1-408-294-8324 Design Challenge Learning thetech.org Students investigate properties of materials and colliding objects by designing spacesuits for balloon astronauts. The objective is to design spacesuits that can withstand the hazards of high velocity impacts from space debris and meteoroids. As students iterate through this design challenge, they gain firsthand experience in the design process. Balloon Astronaut1 Grades 2-8 Estimated time: 45 minutes Student Outcomes: 1. Students will be able to design and build a protective device to keep their balloon astronaut from popping when impaled by a falling nail. 2. Students will be able to explain design considerations based on material characteristics, and concepts of energy, velocity, and the physics of colliding objects. 3. Students will be able to utilize the three step design process to meet an engineering challenge. Next Generation Science Standards Grade 2-5: Engineering Design K-2-ETS1-1, K-2-ETS1-2, K-2-ETS1-3, 3-5-ETS1-1, 3-5-ETS1-2, 3-5-ETS1-3 Grade 2: Physical Science 2-PS1-1, 2-PS1-2 Grade 3: Physical Science 3-PS2-1 Grade 4: Physical Science 4-PS3-1, 4-PS3-3, 4-PS3-4 Grade 5: Physical Science 5-PS2-1 Grade 6-8: Engineering Design MS-ETS1-1, MS-ETS1-2, MS-ETS1-3, MS-ETS1-4; Physical Science MS-PS2-1, MS-PS2-2, MS-PS3-2, MS-PS3-5 Common Core Language Arts-Speaking and Listening Grade 2: SL.2.1a-c, SL.2.3, SL.2.4a Grade 3: SL.3.1b-d, SL.3.3, SL.3.4a Grade 4: SL.4.1b-d, SL.4.4a Grade 5: SL.5.1b-d, SL.5.4 Grade 6: SL.6.1b-d Grade 7: SL.7.1b-d Grade 8: SL.8.1b-d California Science Content Grade 2: Physical Science 1.a-c; Investigation and Experimentation 4.a, 4.c-d Grade 3: Investigation and Experimentation 5.a-b, d Grade 4: Investigation and Experimentation 6.a, 6.c-d Grade 5: Investigation and Experimentation 6.a-c, 6.h Grade 6: Investigation and Experimentation 7.a-b, 7.d-e Grade 7: Investigation and Experimentation 7.a, 7.c-e Grade 8: Physical Science 1.a-e, 2.a-g; Investigation and Experimentation 9.b-c 1 Developed from a program designed by NASA.
    [Show full text]
  • Complex Garment Systems to Survive in Outer Space
    Volume 7, Issue 2, Fall 2011 Complex Garment Systems to Survive in Outer Space Debi Prasad Gon, Assistant Professor, Textile Technology, Panipat Institute of Engineering & Technology, Pattikalyana, Samalkha, Panipat, Haryana, INDIA [email protected] Palash Paul, Assistant Professor, Textile Technology, Panipat Institute of Engineering & Technology, Pattikalyana, Samalkha, Panipat, Haryana, INDIA ABSTRACT The success of astronauts in performing Extra-Vehicular Activity (EVA) is highly dependent on the performance of the spacesuit they are wearing. Since the beginning of the Space Shuttle Program, one basic suit design has been evolving. The Space Shuttle Extravehicular Mobility Unit (EMU) is a waist entry suit consisting of a hard upper torso (HUT) and soft fabric mobility joints. The EMU was designed specifically for zero gravity operations. With a new emphasis on planetary exploration, a new EVA spacesuit design is required. Now the research scientists are working hard and striving for the new, lightweight and modular designs. Thus they have reached to the Red surface of Mars. And sooner or later the astronauts will reach the other planets too. This paper is a review of various types of spacesuits and the different fabrics required for the manufacturing of the same. The detailed construction of EMU and space suit for Mars is discussed here, along with certain concepts of Biosuit- Mechanical Counter pressure Suit. Keywords: Extra-Vehicular Activity (EVA), spacesuits, Biosuit-Mechanical Counter pressure Suit Tissues (skin, heart,
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Space Suit Mobility: Applications to Design and Operations
    2001-01-2162 Modeling Space Suit Mobility: Applications to Design and Operations P. B. Schmidt and D. J. Newman Massachusetts Institute of Technology E. Hodgson Hamilton Sundstrand Space Systems International Copyright © 2001 Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc. ABSTRACT date repetitive tasks. Computer simulation also aids in future space suit design by allowing new space suit or Computer simulation of extravehicular activity (EVA) is component designs to be evaluated without the expense increasingly being used in planning and training for EVA. of constructing and certifying prototypes for human test- A space suit model is an important, but often overlooked, ing. While dynamic simulation is not currently used for component of an EVA simulation. Because of the inher- EVA planning, it has been used for post-flight analyses ent difficulties in collecting angle and torque data for [1, 2]. Other computer-based modeling and analysis space suit joints in realistic conditions, little data exists on techniques are used in pre-flight evaluations of EVA tasks the torques that a space suit’s wearer must provide in and worksites [3, 4]. order to move in the space suit. A joint angle and torque database was compiled on the Extravehicular Maneuver- An important shortcoming of current EVA models is that ing Unit (EMU), with a novel measurement technique that they lack an accurate representation of the torques that used both human test subjects and an instrumented are required to bend the joints of the space suit. The robot. Using data collected in the experiment, a hystere- shuttle EMU, like all pressurized space suits, restricts sis modeling technique was used to predict EMU joint joint motion to specific axes and ranges and has a ten- torques from joint angular positions.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Advanced Space Suit Pressure Garment System Status and Development Priorities 2019
    49th International Conference on Environmental Systems ICES-2019-185 7-11 July 2019, Boston, Massachusetts NASA Advanced Space Suit Pressure Garment System Status and Development Priorities 2019 Amy Ross1 and Richard Rhodes2 NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, 77058 Shane McFarland3 NASA Johnson Space Center/KBR, Houston, TX 77058 This paper discusses the current focus of NASA’s Advanced Space Suit Pressure Garment Technology Development team’s efforts, the status of that work, and a summary of longer term technology development priorities and activities. The Exploration Extra-vehicular Activity Unit (xEMU) project’s International Space Station Demonstration Suit (xEMU Demo) project continues to be the team’s primary customer and effort. In 2018 the team was engaged in addressing hardware design changes identified in the Z-2 pressure garment prototype Neutral Buoyancy Laboratory (NBL) test results. These changes will be discussed. Additionally components whose first iterations were produced in 2018 will be discussed. A full pressure garment prototype, termed Z-2.5, was assembled that is composed of updated and first prototype iteration hardware. Z-2.5 NBL testing, performed from October 2018 through April 2019 will inform final design iterations in preparation for the xEMU Demo preliminary design review planned to occur in the third quarter of government fiscal year 2019. A primary objective of the Z-2.5 NBL testing is to validate changes made to the hard upper torso geometry, which depart from the planetary walking suit upper torso geometry that has been used over the last 30 years. The team continues to work technology development, with GFY2018 work being used to supplement and feed the gaps left by the scope defined for the xEMU Demo.
    [Show full text]
  • Benefits of a Single-Person Spacecraft for Weigh Less Operations
    Future In-Space Operations Colloquium B Griffin Benefits of a Single-Person Spacecraft for Weigh less Operations Brand Griffin August 15, 2012 1 Why Look at a Single-Person Spacecraft? B Griffin Past EVA Contributions Future NASA Plans Emphasize Weightless Operation Weightless Operations 13+ years Add New Capability Samples Current to Improve Weightless Operations 5 to 11 yrs L1 Moon L2 Retrieval/ Repair 13 yrs Asteroid 20 yrs (weightless transit) Mars Assembly 8/15/2012 Benefits of a Single-Person Spacecraft for Weightless Operations 2 Idea is Not New B Griffin 8/15/2012 Benefits of a Single-Person Spacecraft for Weightless Operations 3 Single-Person Spacecraft B Griffin No Reentry Venues ISS Operations Weightless Operations 8/15/2012 Benefits of a Single-Person Spacecraft for Weightless Operations 4 Implications of Low Pressure B Griffin User Design ISS Atmosphere Low pressure space suit •Range of motion •Gas retention 101.3 kPa (14.7 psi) 29.6 kPa (4.3 psi) •Tactile feedback •Restraint •Low forces •Thermal •Minimum fatigue •Micrometeoroid •Comfort •Puncture Prebreathe Glove pressure determines suit pressure O2 O2 29.6 kPa Prebreathe O2 21 % 100% (4.3psi) Purge N2 101.3 kPa N (14.7psi) 2 N 79 % 2 Risk of Decompression Sickness “Bends” 8/15/2012 Benefits of a Single-Person Spacecraft for Weightless Operations 5 Less Overhead Time Better Work Efficiency Index (WEI) B Griffin EMU EVA Overhead Time Gone Away Egress WEI 12.5-14 hr Ingress + 2.5 hr 2.0 0.43 (ISS) 12.0 Direct access without prebreathing minimizes overhead 8/15/2012 Benefits
    [Show full text]
  • Cool Space Suits
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Cool Spacesuits NASA SUMMER OF INNOVATION UNIT DESCRIPTION Life Science—Survival This lesson will enable students to demonstrate, test, and analyze materials GRADE LEVELS utilized in spacesuits to keep astronauts 4 – 6 cool in the harsh environment of space. CONNECTION TO CURRICULUM OBJECTIVES Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Students will • Demonstrate the water cooling TEACHER PREPARATION TIME technology used in the International 1.5 hours Space Station (ISS) Extravehicular Mobility Unit (EMU) LESSON TIME NEEDED • Test and make an analysis of the 2 hours Complexity: Moderate relationship between reflection/absorption and color NATIONAL STANDARDS National Science Education Standards (NSTA) Science as Inquiry • Understanding of scientific concepts • Understanding of the nature of science • Skills necessary to become independent inquirers about the natural world Physical Science Standards • Properties of objects and materials • Transfer of energy Life Science • Organisms and environments Science and Technology • Abilities of technological design • Understanding about science and technology Science in Personal and Social Perspectives • Personal health • Changes in environments • Natural hazards Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (NCTM) Measurement and Data • Represent and interpret data Expressions and Equations • Solve real-life and mathematical problems using numerical and algebraic expressions and equations ISTE NETS and Performance Indicators for Students (ISTE) Creativity and Innovation • Use models and simulations to explore complex systems and issues Research and Information Fluency • Process data and report results Technology Operations and Concepts • Understand and use technology systems • Select and use applications effectively and productively Aerospace Education Services Project MANAGEMENT Review the activities and background information carefully before having MATERIALS the students do each activity in the lesson.
    [Show full text]
  • Benefits of a Single-Person Spacecraft for Weightless Operations (Stop Walking and Start Flying)
    42nd International Conference on Environmental Systems AIAA 2012-3630 15 - 19 July 2012, San Diego, California Benefits of a Single-Person Spacecraft for Weightless Operations (Stop Walking and Start Flying) Brand N. Griffin1 Gray Research, Engineering, Science, and Technical Services Contract, 655 Discovery Drive Ste. 300, Huntsville, AL 35806 U.S.A Historically, less than 20 percent of crew time related to extravehicular activity (EVA) is spent on productive external work. For planetary operations space suits are still the logical choice; however, for safe and rapid access to the weightless environment, spacecraft offer compelling advantages. FlexCraft, a concept for a single-person spacecraft, enables any- time access to space for short or long excursions by different astronauts. For the International Space Station (ISS), going outside is time-consuming, requiring pre-breathing, donning a fitted space suit, and pumping down an airlock. For each ISS EVA this is between 12.5 and 16 hours. FlexCraft provides immediate access to space because it operates with the same cabin atmosphere as its host. Furthermore, compared to the space suit pure oxygen environment, a mixed gas atmosphere lowers the fire risk and allows use of conventional materials and systems. For getting to the worksite, integral propulsion replaces hand-over- hand translation or having another crew member operate the robotic arm. This means less physical exertion and more time at the work site. Possibly more important, in case of an emergency, FlexCraft can return from the most distant point on ISS in less than a minute. The one-size-fits-all FlexCraft means no on-orbit inventory of parts or crew time required to fit all astronauts.
    [Show full text]
  • Lunar Dust Effects on Spacesuit Systems Insights from the Apollo Spacesuits
    NASA/TP 2009 -214786 Lunar Dust Effects on Spacesuit Systems Insights from the Apollo Spacesuits Roy Christoffersen SAIC, Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas John F. Lindsay The Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, Texas Sarah K. Noble NASA Headquarters, Washington, D.C. Mary Ann Meador Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio Joseph J. Kosmo Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas J. Anneliese Lawrence Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia Lynn Brostoff Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. Amanda Young National Air and Space Museum Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Terry McCue Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio April 2009 NASA STI Program ... in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected to the advancement of aeronautics and space papers from scientific and technical confe- science. The NASA scientific and technical in- rences, symposia, seminars, or other meet- formation (STI) program plays a key part in help- ings sponsored or co-sponsored ing NASA maintain this important role. by NASA. The NASA STI program operates under the • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, auspices of the Agency Chief Information Offic- technical, or historical information from er. It collects, organizes, provides for archiving, NASA programs, projects, and missions, of- and disseminates NASA’s STI. The NASA STI ten concerned with subjects having substan- program provides access to the NASA Aeronau- tial public interest. tics and Space Database and its public interface, the NASA Technical Report Server, thus provid- • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. English- ing one of the largest collections of aeronautical language translations of foreign scientific and space science STI in the world. Results are and technical material pertinent to published in both non-NASA channels and by NASA’s mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Suited for Spacewalking. Teacher's Guide with Activities for Physical and Life Science
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 381 392 SE 056 203 AUTHOR Vogt, Gregory L. TITLE Suited for Spacewalking. Teacher's Guide with Activities for Physical and Life Science. Revised. INSTITUTION National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C. Educational Programs Div. REPORT NO EG-101 PUB DATE Aug 94 NOTE 70p. PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Use Teaching Guides (For Teacher) (052) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Biological Sciences; Earth Science; Elementary Secondary Education; Physical Sciences; *Science Activities; Science Curriculum; Science Education; *Space Exploration; Space Sciences; Student Projects IDENTIFIERS *Hands on Science; Space Shuttle;.*Space Suits; Space Travel ABSTRACT This activity guide for teachers interested in using the intense interest many children have inspace exploration as a launching point for exciting hands-on learning opportunities begins with brief discussions of thespace environment, the history of spacewalking, the Space Shuttle spacesuit, and working inspace. These are followed by a series of activities that enable studentsto explore the space environment as well as the science and technology behind the functions of spacesuits. The activitiesare not rated for specific grade levels because they can be adapted for students of many ages. A chart on curriculum application is designed to help teachers incorporate activities into various subjectareas. Activities and related student projects makeuse of inexpensive and easy-to-find materials and tools. Activitiesare arranged into four basic units including: (1) investigating thespace environment; (2) dressing for spacewalking; (3) moving and working inspace; and (4) exploring the surface of Mars. Contains 17 references and 25 resources. (LZ) *********************************************************************** * Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best thatcan be made from the original document.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spacesuit Unpicked
    COMMENT BOOKS & ARTS TECHNOLOGY full-pressure suits and the experiments of early aeromedical researchers. But he also weaves in Christian Dior’s New Look. Dior’s extravagant dresses of 1947 electri- The spacesuit unpicked fied the postwar world with their full skirts that, in contrast to those made during war- Margaret Weitekamp reflects on how fashion time fabric rationing, used many yards of influenced astronautical attire for the Apollo missions. fabric. ‘New Look’ became shorthand for describing sweeping changes in fields as diverse as plastics, criminal justice, roads and hen Neil Armstrong took “one in engineering, archi- politics. De Monchaux unites these diverse small step” on to the Moon’s tecture and design. topics through his analysis of the ‘new look’ surface in 1969, his soft, white, Systems thinking in defence planning, a concept that drove Wlayered spacesuit insulated, cooled, pressur- considers humans as changes in postwar agencies such as NASA. ized and protected his body. But it was not one factor in a broad It is at the core of the story, however, that what many people had thought he would engineering schema Spacesuit gets most interesting — and most be wearing. Most engineers imagined lunar rather than dealing controversial. Those who know the history of landing suits as hard, man-shaped, jointed with humanity’s com- NASA’s spacesuit contracts will bristle at de shells containing pressurized environments plexity and variability, Monchaux’s conflation of the ILC and Play- — essentially, individual ambulatory space- de Monchaux argues. Spacesuit: tex, maker of bras and girdles. In 1947, the craft. The iconic suit, known as the A7L and He contends that such Fashioning Apollo materials company ILC split into four divi- designed by the International Latex Corpora- abstract thinking is NICHOLAS DE sions.
    [Show full text]