DOCSLIB.ORG

Starbucks Corporation; Rule 14A-8 No-Action Letter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

D: +1 (212) 225 2632 [email protected] NOVEMBER 3, 2020 VIA E-MAIL ([email protected]) U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance Office of Chief Counsel 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20549 Re: Stockholder Proposal Submitted by Catherine Donnelly Foundation Ladies and Gentlemen: We are writing on behalf of our client, Starbucks Corporation, a Washington corporation (the “Company”), pursuant to Rule 14a-8(j) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), to notify the staff of the Division of Corporation Finance (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) of the Company’s intention to exclude the shareholder proposal (the “Proposal”) and supporting statement (the “Supporting Statement”) submitted by the Catherine Donnelly Foundation (the “Proponent”), by a letter dated September 18, 2020, from the Company’s proxy statement for its 2021 annual meeting of shareholders (the “Proxy Statement”). In accordance with Section C of SEC Staff Legal Bulletin No. 14D (Nov. 7, 2008) (“SLB 14D”), we are emailing this letter and its attachments to the Staff at [email protected]. In accordance with Rule 14a-8(j), we are simultaneously sending a copy of this letter and its attachments to the Proponent as notice of the Company’s intent to omit the Proposal from the Proxy Statement. The Company expects to file its definitive Proxy Statement with the Commission on or about January 22, 2021, and this letter is being filed with the Commission no later than 80 calendar days before that date in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission, p. 2 Rule 14a-8(j). Rule 14a-8(k) and Section E of SLB 14D provide that shareholder proponents are required to send companies a copy of any correspondence that the shareholder proponent elects to submit to the Commission or the Staff. Accordingly, we are taking this opportunity to remind the Proponent that if the Proponent submits correspondence to the Commission or the Staff with respect to the Proposal, a copy of that correspondence should concurrently be furnished to the undersigned on behalf of the Company. THE PROPOSAL The Proposal and Supporting Statement are attached hereto as Exhibit A. The Proposal states: Resolved, that the board of directors report to shareholders, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, on actions the company is taking to uphold decent work practices in the Company’s owned and franchisee operations, including: 1. Information on the Company’s overall approach and board-level oversight of human capital management in the context of emerging workforce- related risks and opportunities in the retail coffee industry; and 2. Comprehensive workforce metrics that effectively demonstrate the success and challenges the company faces in its management of human capital. BASES FOR EXCLUSION In accordance with Rule 14a-8, we hereby respectfully request that the Staff confirm that no enforcement action will be recommended against the Company if the Proposal and the Supporting Statement are omitted from the Proxy Statement for the following, separately sufficient, reasons: 1. The Proposal may be omitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8(i)(10) because the Company has substantially implemented the Proposal; 2. The Proposal may be omitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8(i)(7) because it deals with a matter relating to the Company’s ordinary business operations; ANALYSIS I. Under Rule 14a-8(i)(10), the Proposal may be omitted because it has been substantially implemented by the Company. Rule 14a-8(i)(10) permits a company to exclude a proposal from its proxy materials if the company “has already substantially implemented the proposal.” The determination that a company has substantially implemented the proposal depends upon whether the company’s policies, practices and procedures “compare favorably with the guidelines of the proposal.” See, Albertson’s Inc. (avail. Mar. 23, 2005); The Talbots, Inc. (avail. Apr. 5, 2002); Cisco Systems, Inc. (avail. Aug. 11, 2003); and Texaco, Inc. (avail. Mar. 28, 1991). In other Securities and Exchange Commission, p. 3 words, substantial implementation under Rule 14a-8(i)(10) requires a company’s actions to have satisfactorily addressed the underlying concerns and “essential objectives” of the proposal. See, The Talbots, Inc. (avail. Apr. 5, 2002) (permitting omission of a proposal that required the establishment of a code of corporate conduct regarding human rights because the company had an existing Standard for Business Practice and Code of Conduct). Differences between a company’s actions and a proposal are permitted so long as the company’s actions satisfactorily address the proposal’s essential objectives. See, Release No. 34-20091 (Aug. 16, 1983); see also Release No. 34-40018 (May 26, 1998) (the “1998 Release”). In Mondelez International Inc. (avail. Mar. 7, 2014), the Staff concurred with the exclusion on substantial implementation grounds of a proposal requesting a report on the company’s process for identifying and analyzing potential and actual human rights risks in the company’s operations and supply chain where the company met the broader essential objective, though not the specific disclosure request, through disclosing the company’s risk management process and the framework it used to assess potential human rights risks). In Walgreen Co. (avail. Sep. 26, 2013), the Staff concurred with the exclusion on substantial implementation grounds of a proposal requesting the elimination of supermajority voting requirements in the company’s governing documents where the company had eliminated all but one of the supermajority voting requirements. See also, Pfizer Inc. (avail. Jan. 11, 2013) (concurring with the exclusion on substantial implementation grounds of a proposal requesting a report detailing all measures implemented to reduce the use of animals and specific plans to promote alternatives to animal use where the company made publicly available on its website a two-page “Pfizer Guidelines and Policy on Laboratory Animal Care” and cited its compliance with the Animal Welfare Act). In addition, the Staff has consistently concurred with the exclusion of shareholder proposals requesting reports where the company has already publicly disclosed the subject matter of the report, even if the disclosure was not in the exact form set forth in the request. See, Amazon.com, Inc. (avail. Mar. 27, 2020) (concurring in the exclusion on substantial implementation grounds of a proposal requesting a report assessing the feasibility of integrating sustainability metrics into senior executive performance measures or vesting conditions where the company’s prior year proxy statement and statement in opposition explained why the company does not integrate performance measures or vesting conditions into compensation arrangements); Hess Corp. (avail. Apr. 11, 2019) (concurring in the exclusion on substantial implementation grounds of a proposal requesting a report on how the company can reduce its carbon footprint in alignment with greenhouse gas reductions necessary to achieve the Paris Agreement’s goal where the company had met the essential objective through its most recent Sustainability Report, its response to a CDP Climate Change Questionnaire and its recent Investor Day Presentation); MGM Resorts International (avail. Feb. 28, 2012) (concurring in the exclusion on substantial implementation grounds of a proposal requesting a report on the company’s sustainability policies and performance, including multiple, objective statistical indicators, where the company published an annual sustainability report). The Proposal and Supporting Statement make clear that the underlying concern or “essential objective” of the Proposal is to ensure that shareholders are informed about the Company’s policies and practices regarding its workforce. The Supporting Statement states that “disclosure of financially material information, including comprehensive workforce metrics, would help investors to assess the effectiveness of the Company’s approach and robustness of the board’s oversight.” (See Exhibit A). Securities and Exchange Commission, p. 4 The Company takes the Proposal’s underlying concern and essential objective seriously and has made numerous disclosure on this precise subject matter including: (i) the Company’s Equal Employment Opportunity Policy (the “EEOP”) provides that all Company employees (“partners”) will be treated fairly, without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, sexual orientation, marital status, veteran status, gender identity and expression, genetic information or any other basis protected by law (See Exhibit B); (ii) the Company’s 2020 Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders & Proxy Statement (the “2020 Proxy Statement”) reiterates the Company’s long-standing commitment to invest in its workforce and reviews the Company’s approach to human capital management (See Exhibit C for relevant 2020 Proxy Statement excerpts); (iii) the Company’s Civil Rights Assessment Reports issued in 2019 (the “2019 Report”) and in February 2020 (the “2020 Report”) discuss the actions the Company has taken to advance civil rights, equity, diversity and inclusion in its workforce and an assessment of success and challenges of such actions (See Exhibit D); and (iv) additional information regarding the Company’s approach to managing its workforce, the initiatives the Company has taken and quantitative and qualitative assessments of the Company’s
Recommended publications
  • Starbucks Corp. (SBUX) Annual General Meeting

    Starbucks Corp. (SBUX) Annual General Meeting

    Corrected Transcript 18-Mar-2020 Starbucks Corp. (SBUX) Annual General Meeting Total Pages: 14 1-877-FACTSET www.callstreet.com Copyright © 2001-2020 FactSet CallStreet, LLC Starbucks Corp. (SBUX) Corrected Transcript Annual General Meeting 18-Mar-2020 CORPORATE PARTICIPANTS Kevin Johnson John Culver President, Chief Executive Officer & Director, Starbucks Corp. Group President-International, Channel Development and Global Coffee & Tea, Starbucks Corp. Rachel A. Gonzalez Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary, Starbucks Corp. Rosalind Gates Brewer Chief Operating Officer, Group President & Director, Starbucks Corp. Justin Danhof General Counsel & Director-Free Enterprise Project, The National Patrick J. Grismer Center for Public Policy Research Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer, Starbucks Corp. Rossann Williams Executive Vice President & President-U.S. company-operated business and Canada, Starbucks Corp. ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION SECTION Kevin Johnson President, Chief Executive Officer & Director, Starbucks Corp. Well, good morning from Seattle, Washington, and welcome to Starbucks' 28th Annual Meeting of Shareholders. I'm so pleased to have you join this webcast and I want to open by thanking the Starbucks Board of Directors, all of whom are joining
  • Gender, the Status of Women, and Family Structure in Malaysia

    Gender, the Status of Women, and Family Structure in Malaysia

    Malaysian Journal of EconomicGender, Studies the Status 53(1): of Women,33 - 50, 2016 and Family Structure in Malaysia ISSN 1511-4554 Gender, the Status of Women, and Family Structure in Malaysia Charles Hirschman* University of Washington, Seattle Abstract: This paper addresses the question of whether the relatively high status of women in pre-colonial South-east Asia is still evident among Malay women in twentieth century Peninsular Malaysia. Compared to patterns in East and South Asia, Malay family structure does not follow the typical patriarchal patterns of patrilineal descent, patrilocal residence of newly married couples, and preference for male children. Empirical research, including ethnographic studies of gender roles in rural villages and demographic surveys, shows that women were often economically active in agricultural production and trade, and that men occasionally participated in domestic roles. These findings do not mean a complete absence of patriarchy, but there is evidence of continuity of some aspects of the historical pattern of relative gender equality. The future of gender equality in Malaysia may depend as much on understanding its past as well as drawing lessons from abroad. Keywords: Family, gender, marriage, patriarchy, women JEL classification: I3, J12, J16, N35 1. Introduction In the introduction to her book onWomen, Politics, and Change, Lenore Manderson (1980) said that the inspiration for her study was the comment by a British journalist that the participation of Malay women in rallies, demonstrations, and the nationalist movement during the late 1940s was the most remarkable feature of post-World War II Malayan politics. The British journalist described the role of Malay women in the nationalist movement as “challenging, dominant, and vehement in their emergence from meek, quiet roles in the kampongs, rice fields, the kitchens, and nurseries” (Miller, 1982, p.
  • Popular Sweeteners and Their Health Effects Based Upon Valid Scientific Data

    Popular Sweeteners and Their Health Effects Based Upon Valid Scientific Data

    Popular Sweeteners and Their Health Effects Interactive Qualifying Project Report Submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science By __________________________________ Ivan Lebedev __________________________________ Jayyoung Park __________________________________ Ross Yaylaian Date: Approved: __________________________________ Professor Satya Shivkumar Abstract Perceived health risks of artificial sweeteners are a controversial topic often supported solely by anecdotal evidence and distorted media hype. The aim of this study was to examine popular sweeteners and their health effects based upon valid scientific data. Information was gathered through a sweetener taste panel, interviews with doctors, and an on-line survey. The survey revealed the public’s lack of appreciation for sweeteners. It was observed that artificial sweeteners can serve as a low-risk alternative to natural sweeteners. I Table of Contents Abstract .............................................................................................................................................. I Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................... II List of Figures ................................................................................................................................... IV List of Tables ...................................................................................................................................
  • Sweeteners Georgia Jones, Extension Food Specialist

    Sweeteners Georgia Jones, Extension Food Specialist

    ® ® KFSBOPFQVLCB?O>PH>¨ FK@LIKUQBKPFLK KPQFQRQBLCDOF@RIQROB>KA>QRO>IBPLRO@BP KLTELT KLTKLT G1458 (Revised May 2010) Sweeteners Georgia Jones, Extension Food Specialist Consumers have a choice of sweeteners, and this NebGuide helps them make the right choice. Sweeteners of one kind or another have been found in human diets since prehistoric times and are types of carbohy- drates. The role they play in the diet is constantly debated. Consumers satisfy their “sweet tooth” with a variety of sweeteners and use them in foods for several reasons other than sweetness. For example, sugar is used as a preservative in jams and jellies, it provides body and texture in ice cream and baked goods, and it aids in fermentation in breads and pickles. Sweeteners can be nutritive or non-nutritive. Nutritive sweeteners are those that provide calories or energy — about Sweeteners can be used not only in beverages like coffee, but in baking and as an ingredient in dry foods. four calories per gram or about 17 calories per tablespoon — even though they lack other nutrients essential for growth and health maintenance. Nutritive sweeteners include sucrose, high repair body tissue. When a diet lacks carbohydrates, protein fructose corn syrup, corn syrup, honey, fructose, molasses, and is used for energy. sugar alcohols such as sorbitol and xytilo. Non-nutritive sweet- Carbohydrates are found in almost all plant foods and one eners do not provide calories and are sometimes referred to as animal source — milk. The simpler forms of carbohydrates artificial sweeteners, and non-nutritive in this publication. are called sugars, and the more complex forms are either In fact, sweeteners may have a variety of terms — sugar- starches or dietary fibers.Table I illustrates the classification free, sugar alcohols, sucrose, corn sweeteners, etc.
  • Race, Reckoning, and Leadership in Tough Times

    Race, Reckoning, and Leadership in Tough Times

    Race, Reckoning, and Leadership in Tough Times Speaker 1: [inaudible]. Jamie Miller: Hello. Good morning. Hi everyone. Welcome to the first full day of the Aspen ideas festival fast one. My name is Jamie Miller. Um, I'm a vice president for public programs at the Aspen Institute. So I'm lucky to get to work on the ideas festival and um, lots of other convenings that we do. Um, I'm delighted to introduce our moderator for this morning who's Jonathan Capehart. Um, one of our, um, good friends of the ideas festival, um, who never fails to delight and inform. We're so pleased to have him and grateful for everything he does for us. He's an opinion writer and on the editorial board at the Washington Post. Um, and so thank you Jonathan for being here and he's going to introduce I'm Roz brewer who were so grateful, made it to the Aspen ideas festival. She is a quite busy lady and um, we're really, really pleased to have you here. So welcome both of you. Jonathan C: Okay. Jonathan C: So good morning everyone. Thank you very much for being here for this morning session. Ross, thank you for sitting down and having this conversation, uh, about all sorts of things, leadership, race. The company, um, the incident that we're all focused on in this, the focus of the, of this conversation is what happened in April of 2018 in Philadelphia at a, at a Starbucks off of Rittenhouse Square.
  • Starbucks Vs. Equal Exchange: Assessing the Human Costs of Economic Globalization

    Starbucks Vs. Equal Exchange: Assessing the Human Costs of Economic Globalization

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Nebraska Anthropologist Anthropology, Department of 1997 Starbucks vs. Equal Exchange: Assessing the Human Costs of Economic Globalization Lindsey M. Smith Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro Part of the Anthropology Commons Smith, Lindsey M., "Starbucks vs. Equal Exchange: Assessing the Human Costs of Economic Globalization" (1997). Nebraska Anthropologist. 111. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/111 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Anthropology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nebraska Anthropologist by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Starbucks vs. Equal Exchange: Assessing the Human Costs of Economic Globalization Lindsey M. Smith This paper discusses the impact of economic globalization on human populations and their natural environment. Trends leading to globalization, such as multilateral and bilateral trade 8fT88ments which reduce trading barriers between countries, are discussed. According to the economic principle of comparative advantage, all countries which specialize in what they can produce most efficiently should benefit equally from fair trade. Developing countries must increasingly rely on cheap labor and low environmental standards to compete for foreign investment and capital in the global economy. Observers argue that the market is not free enough to conect the long-term damage associated with export policies like this. Poverty, misery and social stratification are increasing in many developing countries as a result. A case study of the coffee industry in Latin America provides evidence of the consequences of globalization policies on the most vulnerable populations.
  • Board of Directors

    Board of Directors

    STARBUCKS CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS HOWARD SCHULTZ, 59, is the founder of Starbucks Corporation and serves as our chairman, president and chief executive officer. Mr. Schultz has served as chairman of the board of directors since our inception in 1985, and in January 2008, he reassumed the role of president and chief executive officer. From June 2000 to February 2005, Mr. Schultz also held the title of chief global strategist. From November 1985 to June 2000, he served as chairman of the board and chief executive officer. From November 1985 to June 1994, Mr. Schultz also served as president. From January 1986 to July 1987, Mr. Schultz was the chairman of the board, chief executive officer and president of Il Giornale Coffee Company, a predecessor to the Company. From September 1982 to December 1985, Mr. Schultz was the director of retail operations and marketing for Starbucks Coffee Company, a predecessor to the Company. WILLIAM W. BRADLEY, 69, has been a Starbucks director since June 2003. Since 2000, Senator Bradley has been a managing director of Allen & Company LLC, an investment banking firm. From 2001 until 2004, he acted as chief outside advisor to McKinsey & Company’s non-profit practice. In 2000, Sen. Bradley was a candidate for the Democratic nomination for President of the United States. He served as a senior advisor and vice chairman of the International Council of JP Morgan & Co. from 1997 through 1999. During that time, Sen. Bradley also worked as an essayist for CBS Evening News, and as a visiting professor at Stanford University, the University of Notre Dame and the University of Maryland.
  • Seattle's Seafaring Siren: a Cultural Approach to the Branding Of

    Seattle's Seafaring Siren: a Cultural Approach to the Branding Of

    Running Head: SEATTLE’S SEAFARING SIREN 1 Seattle’s Seafaring Siren: A Cultural Approach to the Branding of Starbucks Briana L. Kauffman Master of Arts in Media Communications March 24, 2013 SEATTLE’S SEAFARING SIREN 2 Thesis Committee Starbucks Starbucks Angela Widgeon, Ph.D, Chair Date Starbucks Starbucks Stuart Schwartz, Ph.D, Date Starbucks Starbucks Todd Smith, M.F.A, Date SEATTLE’S SEAFARING SIREN 3 Copyright © 2013 Briana L. Kauffman All Rights Reserved SEATTLE’S SEAFARING SIREN 4 Abstract Many corporate brands tend to be built on a strong foundation of culture, but very minimal research seems to indicate a thorough analysis of the role of an organizational’s culture in its entirety pertaining to large corporations. This study analyzed various facets of Starbucks Coffee Company through use of the cultural approach to organizations theory in order to determine if the founding principles of Starbucks are evident in their organizational culture. Howard Schultz’ book “Onward” was analyzed and documented as the key textual artifact in which these principles originated. Along with these principles, Starbucks’ Website, Facebook, Twitter and YouTube page were analyzed to determine how Starbucks’ culture was portrayed on these sites. The rhetorical analysis of Schultz’ book “Onward” conveyed that Starbucks’ culture is broken up into a professional portion and a personal portion, each overlapping one another in its principles. After sifting through various tweets, posts and videos, this study found that Starbucks has created a perfect balance of culture, which is fundamentally driven by their values and initiatives in coffee, ethics, relationships and storytelling. This study ultimately found that Starbucks’ organizational culture is not only carrying out their initiatives that they principally set out to perform, but they are also doing so across all platforms while engaging others to do the same.

  • Rosalind Brewer Rosalind Brewer

    Presorted Standard U.S. Postage Paid Austin, Texas Permit No. 01949 TPA TEXAS PUBLISHERS www.TheAustinVillager.com ASSOCIATION This paper can be recycled Vol. 45 No. 17 Phone: 512-476-0082 Email: [email protected] September 15, 2017 Starbucks Names Forbes Magazine INSIDE AKA Soror is Calling Her Rosalind Brewer “The Next Steve Jobs” as Its New Chief RAPPIN’ Stephens dominates Tommy Wyatt Operating Officer Keys in the U.S. Open final. Move over Serena See SLAM and Venus! Here Page 2 comes Sloane and Madison! For the last decade and a half, Venus and Serena Williams have been the leading American women on the professional Tennis Tour. Global music icon They won more tennis rendered a profound championships around the performance. world than any other female See JACKSON players in history. Venus was Page 6 the first to master the tour. But Angel Rich her father said from the by: Businesswomen.org (Courtesy of Afro.com) beginning that Serena would Angel Rich, from Washington, DC, has be better. He turned out to be developed a very innovative app called Credit Stacker right. Serena remained the Rosalind Brewer that teaches students about personal finance, credit champion until she became management, and entrepreneurship in a fun and en- pregnant this year. She had the by: Watch the Yard (Courtesy of Afro.com) gaging way. The app is so popular that 200,000 people H-E-B Chairman baby this summer and is Starbucks just named Alpha Kappa Alpha downloaded it to their smart phones and tablets within contributes millions expected to return to the tour soror Rosalind Brewer, the former president and CEO just two weeks of it’s launch.
  • Starbucks Corporation

    Starbucks Corporation

    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 Form 10-K ¥ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended October 2, 2005 OR n TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to . Commission File Number: 0-20322 Starbucks Corporation (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Washington 91-1325671 (State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 2401 Utah Avenue South 98134 Seattle, Washington 98134 (Zip Code) (Address of principal executive offices) (Registrant's telephone number, including area code): (206) 447-1575 Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value Per Share Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¥ No n Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes n No ¥ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ¥ No n Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation of S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
  • Demand Mounts for Directors with Digital Smarts

    Demand Mounts for Directors with Digital Smarts

    www.AgendaWeek.com 1 of 2 Demand Mounts for Directors With Digital Smarts By Amanda Gerut ore companies are seeking As these recent examples show, boards are Supplies Are Limited Express envisioned Leonsis as a special boardroom. And the recruits can help a experienced new directors, that’s all to directors with digital and social raiding the executive ranks of America’s assistant to CEO Kenneth Chenault to board mirror more closely the background the good, Leonsis says. “Being open to M media expertise, and the urgent top technology brands to recruit new When search rm Spencer Stuart help the company usher in a host of of its company’s customers. various types of board members, demand is prompting boards to consider directors with backgrounds in social surveyed corporate secretaries for its digital strategies. But he was soon encouraging diering ideas and some people who at rst glance would media. Why? “Social media is a 2011 Board Index, it found that appointed as a director and asked to chair At some companies, the search for social accepting those who challenge appear to be unlikely candidates. conversation and interacts with consumers demand for directors with digital the board’s new innovation and media savvy is even making the boards conventional thinking is what pumps and stakeholders,” writes eodore expertise — experience in social media, technology committee. more diverse. For instance, last March, life into a board of directors and e Starbucks board in December made Leonsis, who serves on the boards of technology and e-commerce — had AutoNation’s board appointed another ultimately the company,” he writes.
  • Southeast Debut of New Work by Deborah Roberts at the Spelman College Museum of Fine Art Opens January 2018

    Southeast Debut of New Work by Deborah Roberts at the Spelman College Museum of Fine Art Opens January 2018

    FOR 350 Spelman Lane Box 1526 IMMEDIATE Atlanta, GA 30314 RELEASE museum.spelman.edu MEDIA CONTACTS JOYCE E. DAVIS WYATT PHILLIPS 404-270-5871 404-270-5606 [email protected] [email protected] T: @SpelmanMedia T: @SpelmanMuseum FB: facebook.com/spelmanmuseum November 29, 2017 Southeast Debut of New Work by Deborah Roberts at the Spelman College Museum of Fine Art Opens January 2018 Deborah Roberts: The Evolution of Mimi January 25 – May 19, 2018 ATLANTA (November 29, 2017) – Deborah Roberts creates visually arresting collages that encourage important conversations about girlhood, vulnerability, body image, popular culture, self-image, and the dysfunctional legacy of colorism. Combining found photographs, painting, and drawing, she examines the weight that society places on Black girls. “Deborah Roberts: The Evolution of Mimi,” an original exhibition organized by the Spelman College Museum of Fine Art, features more than 50 collages, paintings, and hand-painted serigraphs. On view January 25 – May 19, 2018, the exhibition includes collages, for which Roberts has gained notoriety, that demonstrate how she grapples with the depiction of beauty and the development of self-image in Black women. It also features her hand-painted serigraphs of names that stereotypically sound like those of Black Witness, 2011 Mixed media on paper girls, challenging viewers to think deeply about how their own 12 x 12 inches Courtesy the artist perceptions are guided by societal expectations and preconceived Collection of Michael Chesser notions. It also features a group of early paintings and works on paper that serve as a catalyst for her current work. Incorporating art history, popular culture, Black culture, and American history, Roberts creates bold provocative works that confront and captivate.