Neuroptera of the Amazon Basin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Neuroptera of the Amazon Basin Neuroptera of the Amazon Basin Part 6. Mantispidae 0) Ncrman D. Penny (2) Abstract families. Thus, the Mantispidae and Berothidae can probably be termed sister groups in phylo- The 27 species of Mantispidae known from the genetic analysis. Amazon Basin are described, keys are presented to their identification, and distributions recorded. Seven new species are recorded for the first time: Plega bear- BIOLOGY di, Plega duckei, Plega paraense, Trichoscelia anae, Cli- maciella amapaensis, Mantispa ariasi, and Mantispa pár­ vula. Twenty names are synonomized: Anisoptera ro­ The eggs of mantispids are laid on the end mani Esben-Petersen = Anchieta bella Westwood; An­ of stalks, as in several other families of chieta nobilis Navas = Anchieta fumosella (Westwood); Neuroptera. The active, first instar larva will Mantispa cognatella Westwood = Plega hagenella seek out a suitable host, whereupon they will (Westwood); Anisoptera amoenula Gerstaecker = Tri­ remain attached as ectoparasites, becoming choscelia egella Westwood; Mantista (Trichoscelia) ba- sella Westwood = Trichoscelia iridella Westwood; Ani­ scarabaeiform in later instars. There appears soptera jocosa Gerstaecker and Symphrasis thaumasta to be three larval instars. Peterson (1960) Navas = Trichoscelia latifascia MacLachlan; Nóbrega mentioned mantispid larvae on spiders and in tinctus Navas = Climaciella semihyalina (Serville); En- spider egg cases. Woglum (1935) reported tanoneura chopardi Navas and Entanoneura jocosa Na­ Plega cocoons inside the cocoons of a noctuid vas = Mantispa batesella Westwood; Mantispa trilinea- ta Navas and Matispa gounellei Navas = Mantispa gra­ moth Xylomeges curialls Grote. Linsley & cilis Erichson: Mantispa viridis Stitz, Mantispa palles- MacSwain (1955) collected larvae of Plega cens Navas, Mantispilla flavescens Navas. Mantispilla in association with pupae of the sc?.rab beetle trichostigna Navas, Mantispa viridula Erichson, Mantis­ Cyclocephala. Based on this information, and pa flaveola, and Mantispa flavomaculata Latreille = further research of their own, Parker & Stange Mantispa minuta (Fabricius); nd Mantispa debilis Gers­ (1965) hypothesized that the melitomse group taecker = Mantispa compellens Walker. Lectotypes are designated for five species: Anchieta nobilis Navas, of Plega parasitize aculeate wasps, while the Trichoscelia partheniella Westwood. Trichoscelia iridel­ signata group parasitize subterranean insects. la Westwood. Mantispa myrapetrella Westwood, and In the British Museum (Natural History) are Mantispa moulti Navas. two specimens of Plega reared from the nssts of Trypoxylon albitarse Fabr. (Sphecidoe) and Zethus (Zethoides) miniatus Sauss. (Vesp'dae). INTRODUCTION In the Vienna Museum is a specimen of Tri­ choscelia varia reared from Polybia (Vesp'dae) Mantispidae, or mantid-flies, are dis­ nests, and the British Museum (Natural His­ tinctive members of the order Neuroptera; tory) has specimens of the same species being characterized as adults by swollen fore of mantispid reared from Myrapctra scu- femur and elongate pronotum. Larvae are tellaris (Vespidae) and Polyb'a ruliceps slender in the first instar, becoming scara- (Vespidae). At times these parasiles can baeiform in subsequent instars. Tjeder (1956) be very abundante. Some reared material has described an African berothid with rapto­ includes dozens of specimens from one nest, rial forelegs, and itemized an impressive list and Parker and Stange (Ibid.) found up to 71% of characters held in common by these two i ( 1 ) — The first parts of this series covered the following groups: part 1 — Sisyridae, part 2 — Dilaridae. part 3 — Ascalaphidae. part 4 — Sialidae, part 5 — Coniop :erygidae. (2) — Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia, Manaus. ACTA AMAZCNICA 12(2): 415-463. 1982. — 415 of Megachile leaf cells in an artificial cave Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Pau­ in southern Mexico to be parasitized by Plega. lo (USP), Nelson Papavero and José Guimarães Both Plega and Trichoscelia belong to the Pla- I am also most grateful to Dr. Jorge R. tymantispinae; known hosts of Mantispinae Arias and his assistants Rui Alves de Freitas are spiders. and João Ferreira Vidal, for their efforts collecting many Amazonian Mantispidae. MORPHOLOGY R.G. Beard had intended to write a re­ vision of American Mantispidae before his In the past there has been little reliance death in 1968. Many type specimens in Euro­ on male genitalia for species identification. pean museums have Beard's determination This has led to heavy reliance on weak labels and synonomy labels on them. This has characters, such as body coloration and wing helped a great deal in directing me in the shape and venation. Penny (1982) raised doubts proper course of species identification. I and presented evidence to show the weakness have agreed with all labels, as marked by of the present grouping of some genera. By Beard, except for his determination that Plega use of male genitalia it becomes quickly evi­ melitomae Parker and Stange is a junior dent that the genera Necyla. Mantispa and En- synonym of Plega hagenella (Westwood). I tanoneura, as formerly defined, are polyphy- find that these two species, although very letic. Thus, these species are placed in res­ similar, show a differing number of male pective species groups within the genus Man­ paramere spines (see Table 1), and thus I have tispa. not synonomized them. However, this one In naming the structures of the male ge­ disagreement cannot diminish the overall as­ nitalia, I have tried to follow the most sistance given by these labels. comnonly used terms, as at the present time This work also could not have been there seems to be no concensus among carried out without the financial assistance of specialists. CNPq/INPA project 2020/401 and CNPq Proje­ to Trópico Úmido grant 3224. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS SlSTEMATICS Several museum curators have been quite generous with loans of material, and quite There has not been a comprehensive study helpful while I was visiting their museums to of all species of Mantispidae since Westwood (1852) described the 46 species known in his examine Amazonian mantispids. I would like time. Hagen (1861) listed the New World to gratefully acknowledge the help given by species, and in 1866 did the same for the whole these museums and curators: world. In somewhat more recent times, En- British Museum (Natural History), London derlein (1910) established much of our present (BMNH), Peter Barnard classification system, with a key to subfami­ Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris lies, tribes and genera. Stitz (1913) gave (MNHN), Jean LeGrand descriptions of species in the Berlin Museum, Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi. Belém (MPEG), including many from South America. The William L. Overal subsequent 20 years was dominated by Museu Territorial Costa Lima, Macapá (MTCL), hundreds of species descriptions and dis­ Antonio Farias tributional records by Longinso Navás, many Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna (MWIE), of which were from Latin America. This period Alfred Kaltenbach was followed by almost no activity in taxonomy Hope Department of Zoology, Oxford Univer­ of South American Mantispidae for more than sity, Oxforfl (OXF), Dr. Graham 25 years. However, in 1958. Williner and Kor- United States National Museum, Washington, milev described the species of Mantispidae from Argentina, and In 1960 Handschin redes- (USNM), Oliver S. Flint, Jr. cribed the South American species of Clima- KEY TO GENERA OF PLATYMANTISPINAE ciella, Entanoneura and Paramantispa, using drawings of some male genitalia for the first 1a. Subbasal spine of fore femur present; time from this region. Parker & Stange (1965) hindwing recurrent vein of media without presented valuable new characters for charac­ crossvein 2 ters for separation of Plega and Trichoscelia. 1b. Subbasal spine of fore femur absent; In 1977 Penny listed 15 genera and 112 species hindwing recurrent vein of media with from Latin America. The present study de­ crossvein Trichoscelia scribes the genera and species from Amazo­ 2a. Forewing second radial cell curving nia. The two subfamilies can be separated around wing apex Plega using the following key: 2b. Forewing second radial cell straight .... Anchieta KEY TO SUBFAMILIES OF AMAZONIAN Anchieta Navas, 1909 MANTISPIDAE Anisoptera Schneider, 1843, Mon. Raphidiae, p 32 (preoccupied by Anisoptera Berthold. 1827, and 1a. Fore tarsi with two claws and arolium; Anisoptera Herrich-Schaeffer, 1840). female bearing ovipositor; male with Anchieta Navas, 1909, Mes. R. Acad, cienc. artes Bar­ coiled or recurved, internal spinasternum; celona, (3) 7: 483. anterior first tarsal segment with a denti­ Platymantispa Rehn, 1939, Ent. News, 50: 82. form process; pronotum only slightly Ion Anisopterana Strand, 1942, Folia zool. hydrobiol., 11:389. ger than wide PLATYMANTISPINAE TYPE SPECIES: of Anisoptera Schneider is Ani­ 1b. Fore tarsi with one claw and lacking soptera notha Erichson (1839), designated by arolium; female without ovipositor; male Enderlein (1910); of Anchieta is Anchieta no­ with simple internal spinasternum; ante­ bilis Navas, by monotypy. rior first tarsal segment without dentiform Anchieta is closely related to Plega, with process; pronotum two or three times as both having a large subbasal spine on the fore long as wide MANTISPINAE femur. Species of Anchieta from southern Brazil (and A. fumosella) are quite distinctive, having some dark infuscation of the wings and Platymantispinae Rehn, 1939 larger size. The few specimens known from Amazonia
Recommended publications
  • Insects and Related Arthropods Associated with of Agriculture
    USDA United States Department Insects and Related Arthropods Associated with of Agriculture Forest Service Greenleaf Manzanita in Montane Chaparral Pacific Southwest Communities of Northeastern California Research Station General Technical Report Michael A. Valenti George T. Ferrell Alan A. Berryman PSW-GTR- 167 Publisher: Pacific Southwest Research Station Albany, California Forest Service Mailing address: U.S. Department of Agriculture PO Box 245, Berkeley CA 9470 1 -0245 Abstract Valenti, Michael A.; Ferrell, George T.; Berryman, Alan A. 1997. Insects and related arthropods associated with greenleaf manzanita in montane chaparral communities of northeastern California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-167. Albany, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Dept. Agriculture; 26 p. September 1997 Specimens representing 19 orders and 169 arthropod families (mostly insects) were collected from greenleaf manzanita brushfields in northeastern California and identified to species whenever possible. More than500 taxa below the family level wereinventoried, and each listing includes relative frequency of encounter, life stages collected, and dominant role in the greenleaf manzanita community. Specific host relationships are included for some predators and parasitoids. Herbivores, predators, and parasitoids comprised the majority (80 percent) of identified insects and related taxa. Retrieval Terms: Arctostaphylos patula, arthropods, California, insects, manzanita The Authors Michael A. Valenti is Forest Health Specialist, Delaware Department of Agriculture, 2320 S. DuPont Hwy, Dover, DE 19901-5515. George T. Ferrell is a retired Research Entomologist, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 2400 Washington Ave., Redding, CA 96001. Alan A. Berryman is Professor of Entomology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6382. All photographs were taken by Michael A. Valenti, except for Figure 2, which was taken by Amy H.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Hentzia Mitrata (Hentz 1846) (Araneae: Salticidae: Dendryphantinae)1
    Peckhamia 91.1 Notes on Hentzia mitrata 1 PECKHAMIA 91.1, 8 June 2011, 1―15 ISSN 1944―8120 Notes on Hentzia mitrata (Hentz 1846) (Araneae: Salticidae: Dendryphantinae) 1 David Edwin Hill 2 1 All contents of this paper (except Figure 7, 5―6) are released for public use under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license 2 213 Wild Horse Creek Drive, Simpsonville, South Carolina 29680 USA, email [email protected] The 21―22 known species of the dendryphantine Hentzia Marx 1883 have primarily a Caribbean to circum-Caribbean distribution (Richman 1989, 2010, Hedin and Maddison 2001, Platnick 2011, Prószyński 2011). Two related species placed in the palmarum group, H. palmarum (Hentz 1832) and H. mitrata (Hentz 1846) are widely distributed across eastern North America, both in association with shrubs and trees (Richman 1989, Figure 1). urban and built-up land dryland cropland and pasture irrigated cropland and pasture mixed dryland/irrigated cropland and pasture cropland/grassland mosaic cropland/woodland mosaic grassland shrubland mixed shrubland/grassland savanna deciduous broadleaf forest deciduous needleleaf forest evergreen broadleaf forest evergreen needleleaf forest mixed forest water bodies herbaceous wetland wooded wetland barren or sparsely vegetated herbaceous tundra wooded tundra mixed tundra bare ground tundra snow or ice unlabelled land area Figure 1. Distribution of Hentzia mitrata. Records presented by Richman (1989) are shown in black and white. Newer records posted with photographic documentation on the internet (primarily at FLICKR and BugGuide sites) are shown in grey. The Greenville County, South Carolina site associated with these notes is highlighted in bright green. The background image was created with a National Atlas tool (http://www.nationalatlas.gov/mapmaker) using USGS 1992 1 km landcover data.
    [Show full text]
  • Wasp Mantidfly
    Colorado Insect of Interest Wasp Mantidfly Scientific Name: Climaciella brunnea (Say) Order: Neuroptera (Lacewings, Antlions, Snakeflies, Dobsonflies and Relatives) Family: Mantispidae (Mantidflies) Figure 1. Wasp mantidfly female Identification and Descriptive Features: The wasp mantidfly is a strong mimic of some of the native paper wasps (Polistes spp.). The body is of similar size, generally of the same brown coloration with yellow band markings, and the wings are dusky. However, it is readily distinguishable by the narrow prothorax and grasping forelegs, reminiscent of a mantid. Distribution in Colorado: Although uncommon, the wasp mantidfly is widely distributed in the state, having been recovered from several areas of eastern Colorado as well as the West Slope counties along the Utah border. It likely can be found where ever the large wolf spider hosts of the larvae occur. Life History and Habits: Wasp mantidfly adults emerge in late spring and fly to trees and shrubs Figure 2. Wasp mantidfly feeding on blow fly (right). There are two where they feed on small insects Polistes wasps on the upper left, the species that the wasp mantidfly and drink plant ooze. After mimics. mating, the females lay hundreds of eggs on leaves, often in long rows. The first stage larvae that hatch remain on the leaves and wait for a passing spider, to which they readily attach. Large wolf spiders are the most common hosts for mantidfly larvae, which may feed a bit on the blood of the spider during the first instar. However, further development occurs upon the spider’s eggs. When eggs are laid the mantidfly larva migrates to the eggs before the egg sac is covered with silk.
    [Show full text]
  • Other Arthropod Species
    Queen’s University Biological Station Species List: Other Arthropods The current list has been compiled by Dr. Ivy Schoepf, QUBS Research Coordinator, in 2018 and includes data gathered by direct observation, collected by researchers at the station and/or assembled using digital distribution maps. The list has been put together using resources from The Natural Heritage Information Centre (April 2018); The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (February 2018); iNaturalist and GBIF. Contact Ivy to report any errors, omissions and/or new sightings. Because arthropods comprise an Figure 1. Northern walkingsticks (Diapheromera incredibly diverse phylum, which includes femorata) can be quite large and measure up to 95 thousands of species, to help the reader navigate mm, with females typically being larger than males. their staggering diversity, I have broken down The one pictured here from QUBS is a rather small the entire phylum into several order- and class- individual, only measuring 50 mm. Photo courtesy of based sub-lists. The current list is, therefore, not Dr. Ivy Schoepf comprehensive and focuses only on a subset of arthropods. For information regarding arachnids; beetles; crickets & grasshoppers; crustaceans; dragonflies; flies; hymenopterans; and moths & butterflies, please consult their very own lists published on our website. Based on the aforementioned criteria we can expect to find 84 additional arthropod species (phylum: Arthropoda) present at QUBS. These include 68 insects (class: Insecta); eight millipedes (class: Diplopoda); five springtails (class: Entognatha); two centipedes (class: Chilopoda); and one hexanauplian (class: Hexanauplia). Five species are considered as introduced (i). Species are reported using their full taxonomy; common name and status, based on whether the species is of global or provincial concern (see Table 1 for details).
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroptera (Neuropterida)
    33 NEUROPTERA (NEUROPTERIDA) John D. Oswald', Atilano Contreras-Ramos" & Norman D. Penny RESUMEN. En este capitulo se presenta un panorama difficult to encounter. They probably attain their sobre la sistematica, biologia y distribuci6n geografi­ greatest abundance (but not diversity) in desert ca de los Neuroptera (Planipennia) de Mexico, con communities and in a variety of temperate habi­ una orientaci6nhacia la literatura taxon6mica.Se con­ tats, such as forests, grasslands, and urban back­ sideran las familias actualmente conocidas en Mexi­ yards. On warm, early fall evenings in north tem­ co,las cuales estan en orden descendente por riqueza perate towns and cities, storefront and home win­ de especies registradas (entre parentesis): Myrme­ dows are often covered with hundreds of adult leontidae (97), Chrysopidae (81), Hemerobiidae (44), lacewings attracted to the lights. Coniopterygidae (36), Mantispidae (22), Ascalaphidae Neuroptera have two distinctive characteristics (21), Sisyridae (4), Ithonidae (2), Berothidae (2), Dila­ that make them fascinating creatures. First, they ridae (1) y Polystoechotidae (1). Lafauna total de Neu­ are predators, especially as larvae, giving them the roptera actualmente registrada en el pais suma 311 es­ distinction of helping protect us from a wide vari­ pecies. Como en otroscasos,elorden ha sido estudiado ety of agricultural and horticultural pests (Tauber s610 superficialmente en Mexico, por 10 que se consi­ et al., 2000) as well as disease carriers. Secondly, dera importante que se realicen estudios sistematicos they have developed broad, membranous wings y faunisticos en las diferentes regiones del pais. for flight, which are strengthened by an elaborate network of crossveins, and hence the name lacew­ ings.
    [Show full text]
  • 1--120--Gruenwaldand 2017
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326651933 Web-Based system for study of pest dynamics in relation to climate change Article in Indian Journal of Entomology · January 2018 DOI: 10.5958/0974-8172.2018.00081.0 CITATION READS 1 13 3 authors, including: Sengottaiyan Vennila National Centre for Integrated Pest Management 158 PUBLICATIONS 661 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Interaction effects of cultivars,agrotechniques and pest management of entomofauna of cotton View project CROPSAP View project All content following this page was uploaded by Sengottaiyan Vennila on 14 January 2021. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Sale Commercial for Not Copy, www.entosocindia.org Members THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA www.entosocindia.org (Registration No. S 2434 of 1963-64 dt. 12.3.1964) NITI AAYOG ID: VO/NGO-DL/2016/0104219 President DR. S.N. PURI Vice Presidents DR. N.K. KRISHNAKUMAR DR. B.V. PATIL DR. M. PREMJIT SINGH DR. (MS) CHANDISH BALLAL DR. K.S. KHOKHAR (Honorary) (Honorary) General Secretary Joint Secretary DR. J.P. SINGH DR. SUBHASH CHANDER Chief Editor Treasurer DR. V.V. RAMAMURTHY DR. N.M. MESHRAM Councillors Dr. H.K. SINGH Dr. S.S.Suroshe CHAPTERS MADURAI (DR. K. SURESH)* UMIAM, MEGHALAYA (DR. G.T. BEHERE)** *Approved in 2017; **Approved in 2018 — Subject to terms and conditions of ESI EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD Chairman- Dr. S. Subramanian, New Delhi I) Toxicology: Chemical Ecology: Sale IV) VII) IPM/ Acarology: Section Editor- Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroptera: Mantispidae)
    Zootaxa 4450 (5): 501–549 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4450.5.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1CE24D40-39D3-40BF-A1A0-2D0C15DCEDE3 A revision of and keys to the genera of the Mantispinae of the Oriental and Palearctic regions (Neuroptera: Mantispidae) LOUWRENS P. SNYMAN1,2,4, CATHERINE L. SOLE2 & MICHAEL OHL3 1Department of Tropical and Veterinary Diseases, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0110, South Africa 2Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa. E-mail: [email protected] 3Museum für Naturkunde, Invalidenstr. 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] 4Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Table of contents Abstract . 501 Introduction . 502 Material and methods . 502 Results and discussion . 504 Generic treatments . 505 Section I: Asperala, Austroclimaciella, Campanacella, Euclimacia, Eumantispa, Mimetispa, Nampista, Stenomantispa and Tuberonotha 505 Genus Asperala Lambkin . 505 Genus Austroclimaciella Handschin . 505 Genus Campanacella Handschin . 508 Genus Euclimacia Enderlein . 510 Genus Eumantispa Okamoto . 511 Genus Mimetispa Handschin . 512 Genus Nampista Navás . 512 Genus Stenomantispa Stitz . 512 Genus Tuberonotha Handschin . 515 Section II: Austromantispa, Necyla (=Orientispa) and Xaviera . 516 Genus Austromantispa Esben-Petersen . 517 Genus Necyla Navás . 518 Genus Xaviera Lambkin . 519 Section III: Mantispa and Mantispilla (= Sagittalata + Perlamantispa) . 519 Genus Mantispa Illiger in Kugelann . 521 Genus Mantispilla Enderlein . 522 Acknowledgements . 524 References . 524 Appendix . 526 References: catalogue section . 546 Abstract The Mantispinae (Neuroptera: Mantispidae) genera of the Oriental and Palearctic regions are revised.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 5: Fauna Known to Occur on Fort Drum
    Appendix 5: Fauna Known to Occur on Fort Drum LIST OF FAUNA KNOWN TO OCCUR ON FORT DRUM as of January 2017. Federally listed species are noted with FT (Federal Threatened) and FE (Federal Endangered); state listed species are noted with SSC (Species of Special Concern), ST (State Threatened, and SE (State Endangered); introduced species are noted with I (Introduced). INSECT SPECIES Except where otherwise noted all insect and invertebrate taxonomy based on (1) Arnett, R.H. 2000. American Insects: A Handbook of the Insects of North America North of Mexico, 2nd edition, CRC Press, 1024 pp; (2) Marshall, S.A. 2013. Insects: Their Natural History and Diversity, Firefly Books, Buffalo, NY, 732 pp.; (3) Bugguide.net, 2003-2017, http://www.bugguide.net/node/view/15740, Iowa State University. ORDER EPHEMEROPTERA--Mayflies Taxonomy based on (1) Peckarsky, B.L., P.R. Fraissinet, M.A. Penton, and D.J. Conklin Jr. 1990. Freshwater Macroinvertebrates of Northeastern North America. Cornell University Press. 456 pp; (2) Merritt, R.W., K.W. Cummins, and M.B. Berg 2008. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 4th Edition. Kendall Hunt Publishing. 1158 pp. FAMILY LEPTOPHLEBIIDAE—Pronggillled Mayflies FAMILY BAETIDAE—Small Minnow Mayflies Habrophleboides sp. Acentrella sp. Habrophlebia sp. Acerpenna sp. Leptophlebia sp. Baetis sp. Paraleptophlebia sp. Callibaetis sp. Centroptilum sp. FAMILY CAENIDAE—Small Squaregilled Mayflies Diphetor sp. Brachycercus sp. Heterocloeon sp. Caenis sp. Paracloeodes sp. Plauditus sp. FAMILY EPHEMERELLIDAE—Spiny Crawler Procloeon sp. Mayflies Pseudocentroptiloides sp. Caurinella sp. Pseudocloeon sp. Drunela sp. Ephemerella sp. FAMILY METRETOPODIDAE—Cleftfooted Minnow Eurylophella sp. Mayflies Serratella sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Climaciella Brunnea, the Wasp Mantidfly (Mantispidae: Neuroptera) Joseph Mccarthy, Forest Huval, Chris Carlton and Gene Reagan
    Climaciella brunnea, The Wasp Mantidfly (Mantispidae: Neuroptera) Joseph McCarthy, Forest Huval, Chris Carlton and Gene Reagan Description Life Cycle The wasp mantidfly, also known as the brown Courtship begins when a male approaches a female mantidfly, is a member of the family Mantispidae. Adult and “dances” for her by repeatedly extending and members of this family are characterized by their retracting his wings and front pair of legs. The males similarity to praying mantises. The latter are members also release pheromones that attract the females. Mated of a different, unrelated order, the Mantodea. Mantidflies females have been observed laying up to 3,300 eggs in possess elongated bodies and raptorial forelimbs and three batches. Embryos develop for two to four weeks large, clawlike legs similar to those of mantises. The before the larvae hatch. characteristic raptorial limbs evolved independently in each group, meaning mantispids and mantises each developed raptorial forelimbs from different ancestral lineages of insects. The order Neuroptera, in which mantidflies are placed, also includes lacewings, owlflies and other net-winged insect families that lack the raptorial front legs. The wasp mantidfly exhibits Batesian mimicry — a form of mimicry where an otherwise harmless species mimics the physical attributes of a dangerous species, in this case a paper wasp, to avoid predation. Adults are similar in size and coloration to paper wasps in that their heads, thoraxes, abdomens and legs are all covered in brown and yellow stripes. The wings are partly transparent with brown forward edges (also similar to many wasps). Their front pair of raptorial legs are held Adult wasp mantidfly on plant stem.
    [Show full text]
  • South African National Survey of Arachnida (SANSA): Review of Current Knowledge, Constraints and Future Needs for Documenting Spider Diversity (Arachnida: Araneae)
    South African National Survey of Arachnida (SANSA): review of current knowledge, constraints and future needs for documenting spider diversity (Arachnida: Araneae) A.S. Dippenaar-Schoeman1,2*, C.R. Haddad3, S.H. Foord4, R. Lyle1, L.N. Lotz5 & P. Marais1 1ARC-Plant Protection Research Institute, Private Bag X134, Queenswood, Pretoria, 0121, South Africa; 2Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa; 3Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein, 9300, South Africa; 4Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Zoology, University of Venda, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou, 0950, South Africa; 5National Museum, Bloemfontein, P.O. Box 266, Bloemfontein, 9300, South Africa *Author for correspondence E-mail: [email protected] Biodiversity is one of the most important concepts in contemporary biology, with a broad range of applications. In November 1995, South Africa ratified the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Signatories are obligated to develop a strategic plan for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. To meet the requirements of the CBD, the South African National Survey of Arachnida (SANSA) was initiated in 1997. This national project has several aims: to document and describe the arachnid fauna of South Africa; to consolidate all the available data on South African arachnids into one relational database and to make this biodiversity information available to science; and to address issues concerning their conservation and sustainable use. Extensive sampling took place and the SANSA database contains a wealth of biodiversity data that are used to provide answers to ecological questions. Presently 71 spider families, 471 genera and 2170 species are known from South Africa, representing approximately 4.8% of the world fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroptera, Mantispidae)
    Hoffman, K. M . and J. R. Brushwein . 1989 . Species of spiders (Araneae) associated with the immature stages of Mantispa pulchella (Neuroptera, Mantispidae) . J . Arachnol ., 17 :7-14 . SPECIES OF SPIDERS (ARANEAE) ASSOCIATED WITH THE IMMATURE STAGES OF MANTISPA PULCHELLA (NEUROPTERA, MANTISPIDAE) Kevin M . Hoffman Department of Entomology Clemson University Clemson, South Carolina 29634-0365 USA and Jeffrey R . Brushwein University of Florida, IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center 700 Experiment Station Road Lake Alfred, Florida 33850-2299 USA ABSTRACT Species of spiders associated with the immature stages of Mantispa pulchella (Banks) are presented for the first time . Twenty species in 15 genera from the families Philodromidae, Anyphaenidae, Oxyopidae, Thomisidae, and Salticidae harbored immature stages of M. pulchella in South Carolina. Some characteristics of the life history of M. pulchella are analyzed and compared with those of other North American species of Mantispinae . The cosmopolitan family Mantispidae was recently divided into the subfamilies Symphrasinae, Drepanicinae, Calomantispinae, and Mantispinae (Lambkin 1986) . Little is known about the life histories of the first three subfamilies . Several species of the Symphrasinae have been associated with nests of aculeate Hymenoptera as well as with pupae of Noctuidae and Scarabaeidae (Parker and Stange 1965), and one species of the Drepanicinae has been associated with a spider egg sac (Austin 1985) . Natural history of the Calomantispinae remains unknown, although MacLeod and Redborg (1982) suggested, based on laboratory rearings, that larvae of the Symphrasinae and Calomantispinae were generalist predators of sedentary arthropod prey . In contrast, adult Mantispinae have been reared exclusively from spider egg sacs (Redborg and MacLeod 1985 ; Brushwein 1986) .
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Reynoso-Velasco1 & Atilano Contreras-Ramos1,2 Mantidflies
    _____________________________________________________ Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on Neuropterology. Piran, Slovenia, 2008. Devetak, D., Lipovšek, S. & Arnett, A.E. (eds). Maribor, Slovenia, 2010. Pp. 269–276. ___________________________________________________________________________ Overview of the taxonomic and biological knowledge of Mexican Mantispidae (Insecta: Neuroptera) Daniel Reynoso-Velasco1 & Atilano Contreras-Ramos1,2 1Instituto de Biología, Dpto. de Zoología, Apdo. Postal 70-153, 04510 México, D.F., Mexico 2Corresponding autor; E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Taxonomic and biological knowledge of Mexican Mantispidae is summarized. Knowledge on this insect group in Mexico is only fragmentary, particularly in regard to life history. Currently, 23 valid species and three morphospecies have been recorded. Morphospecies of Plega (2) and Trichoscelia (1) probably represent undescribed species. Known species diversity is distributed in the genera Plega (10), Trichoscelia (4), Zeugomantispa (3), Climaciella (2), Dicromantispa (2), Nolima (2), Entanoneura (1), Leptomantispa (1), and Xeromantispa (1). Few studies treat the taxonomy of Mexican mantispids. Studies are required for the partially revised Plega and Trichoscelia, while a taxonomic revision of Nolima is close to completion. In regard to biology, it is known that members of Plega and Trichoscelia are predators of some hymenopterans. Mating behavior of one species of Trichoscelia has also been documented. Key words: Mantispidae, Mexico,
    [Show full text]