50 Douglas Liberal Predicament

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

50 Douglas Liberal Predicament THE LIBERAL PREDICAMENT, 1945 – 64 For most of the twenty years from 1945 to 1964, it looked as if the Liberals were finished. They were reduced to a handful of MPs, most of whom held their seats precariously,. They were desperately short of money and organisation, and were confronted by two great parties, both seeking to look as ‘liberal’ as possible. For the ambitious would- be Liberal politician, there was practically no prospect of a seat in Parliament, or even on the local council. Roy Douglas examines why, despite the desperate state of their party, many Liberals kept the faith going, and not only carried on campaigning, but also laid the foundations for long-term revival. Liberal election poster, 196 1 Journal of Liberal History 50 Spring 2006 THE LIBERAL PREDICAMENT, 1945 – 64 he great Liberal vic- It wasn’t at all like 1874, when a failed. At the general election of tory of 1906 had been Liberal government had more or that year, the Liberal Party won won, more than any- less worked itself out of a job, or a little under 5.3 million votes, thing else, by the party’s 1886, when a Liberal government against well over 8 million each devotion to free trade was divided on a major issue of for the other two parties; but Tand its resistance both to the policy, or 1895, when a Liberal they only obtained fifty-nine protectionist campaign of ren- government collapsed in chaos. MPs, one of whom promptly egade Joseph Chamberlain and Wisely or (to the author’s mind) defected to Labour. Liberals to the temporising of Tory Prime unwisely, the controversial ele- were conscious that they had Minister Arthur Balfour. In that ments in the immediate Liberal scraped the bottom of the barrel election the Labour Representa- programme were thrust aside in By the of their resources, and there was tion Committee (the incipient the interests of ‘national unity’. no prospect of them mounting Labour Party) showed as much Irish home rule was put in cold end of the a comparable campaign in the concern for free trade as did the storage, while the land valuation war, Liber- foreseeable future. Liberals themselves. This was not which was to be the foundation So what were Liberals to do? surprising. In the great battles of of land value taxation was sus- als were In the 1920s and 1930s, many the nineteenth century, free trade pended and other social reforms decided that the logic of the had been perceived to be at least were set aside. profoundly situation prescribed that they as much in the interest of work- By the end of the war, Liberals should shift either to Labour or ing people as of any other class were profoundly split by issues split by to the Conservatives, perhaps via in society – more so, perhaps, which had little to do either issues the ‘Liberal Nationals’. Others because the poorer people were with the radical programme on refused to do so. They continued the more important it was that which they had been engaged which had to preach pre-1914 Liberalism, they should be able to buy things in 1914 or with the long-term with adjustments for changed as cheaply as possible. aims of liberalism. Most crucial little to do conditions. These included some The new government which of those issues was whether Lib- significant additions wholly con- was triumphantly confirmed in eral aims could best be attained either with sistent with the pre-1914 tradi- office in1906 set a pattern which through complete independence the radi- tion, notably an active programme would dominate Liberal thinking or by cooperation with others, to conquer unemployment, poli- for a great many years to come, and specifically the Conserva- cal pro- cies designed to spread the own- and is not without influence to tives, in a coalition. This dispute ership of property much more this day. In the next few years it among Liberals opened up a gramme on widely, and support for electoral was proved that a free trade econ- great opportunity for the Labour reform through proportional rep- omy was wholly consistent with Party to seize leadership of the which they resentation. In the closing years of a vigorous programme of social forces of reform. After the gen- had been the 1930s, however, international reform which laid the founda- eral election of 1924 there was questions subsumed all others. tions of the welfare state, with little doubt in most people’s engaged major constitutional changes in minds that the immediate future the direction of democracy and lay between the Conservative in 1914 or 1945 and after with radical economic reform and Labour Parties. There fol- When the Second World War pivoting on the taxation of land lowed a serious, but foredoomed, with the came to an end in 1945, the values. attempt by Liberals to recapture long-term familiar inter-war policies When war was declared in their party’s historic role as the remained the objective of active 1914, there was a universal senti- mainspring of political change, aims of lib- Liberals, with important wartime ment among Liberals that the gov- but by the middle of 1929 it additions bearing the stamp of ernment’s work was unfinished. was plain that the attempt had eralism. Sir William Beveridge – notably Journal of Liberal History 50 Spring 2006 1 THE LIBERAL PREDICAMENT, 1945–64 further policies to eradicate The Lib- won a great majority, while Lib- By 1950, however, this pros- unemployment and a greatly eral representation in the House pect seemed excessively unlikely extended programme of social eral pro- of Commons crashed to twelve, to most objective observers, but welfare. No important Liberal the lowest figure ever. The the leadership could not be seen saw any inconsistency between gramme, major Liberal personalities were to resile from its optimism. Cer- these various policies. The Lib- defeated: the leader Sir Archibald tainly there were shades of opin- eral programme, as presented to as pre- Sinclair, the chief whip and sole ion visible in the Liberal Party at the electorate in anticipation of sented London MP Sir Percy Harris, this time, as in any other demo- the 1945 general election, looks even Sir William Beveridge. So cratic party, but the whole raison like a document which would to the were long-serving MPs like Gra- d’etre of the party was to present a have received the eager approval ham White, Sir Geoffrey Mander distinctively Liberal point of view, of Campbell-Bannerman, electorate and Dingle Foot. Not a single and most of the Liberal notables Asquith and Lloyd George in the Liberal seat was held in or near avoided meticulously any sign early years of the twentieth cen- in antici- any large town. The Liberal MPs of leaning towards one or other tury.1 Liberals believed that this pation of who had somehow survived the of their opponents. This impar- programme also corresponded maelstrom were largely unknown, tiality did not satisfy all Liberals, much more closely with the the 1945 even to each other, and the choice not even the MPs. Long before needs and wishes of the British of Clement Davies as their chair- 1950 Tom Horabin (who had people than did the programme general man in the aftermath of the elec- briefly been chief whip) defected of any other party, and they were tion was by no means a foregone to Labour, and Gwilym Lloyd- probably right. election, conclusion.4 George was regularly voting with The Liberal election manifesto looks like For Liberals, the natural the Conservatives. The general of 1945 was designed for a Lib- response was to reform the party election manifesto of 1950 nev- eral government. Unfortunately, a docu- machinery. In the later 1940s, ertheless began with the words, a Liberal government was not a under the inspiration of very ‘The Liberal Party offers the serious possibility at that election. ment which active, relatively young and hith- electorate the opportunity of The party still had an impressive erto unknown men like Frank returning a Liberal Government list of leaders. Lord Samuel and Sir would have Byers, Philip Fothergill and to office’.6 Like that of 1945, it Archibald Sinclair had served in received Edward Martell, they devised a was a programme designed for a cabinets – Sinclair very recently as programme for improving the Liberal government to follow, and Secretary of State for Air. Sir Wil- the eager organisation and finances of the traditional policies like free trade liam Beveridge was universally party at all levels. Martell’s later featured prominently. known as the author of famous approval peregrinations should not blind But the Liberal organisation of and popular reports on social pol- Liberals to the immensely valu- 1950, though considerably better icy. Dingle Foot, Graham White of Camp- able services he rendered to the than in 1945, was vastly inferior and Gwilym Lloyd-George had bell-Ban- party at this stage. To a consid- to that of the other two parties held ministerial office. It is likely erable extent they succeeded. in nearly all constituencies, and that Clement Davies had been of nerman, Liberal Associations were set up hardly anybody took the prospect crucial importance in the chain almost everywhere, and most of an immediate Liberal govern- of events which led to Win- Asquith of them acquired some idea of ment seriously. At the same time, ston Churchill becoming Prime the sort of organisation that was most people, however they voted, Minister in 1940.2 Lady Violet and Lloyd necessary to get their message perceived the gap between the Bonham Carter was undeniably George in over to the electorate.
Recommended publications
  • Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell
    Copyrights sought (Albert) Basil (Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell) Filson Young (Alexander) Forbes Hendry (Alexander) Frederick Whyte (Alfred Hubert) Roy Fedden (Alfred) Alistair Cooke (Alfred) Guy Garrod (Alfred) James Hawkey (Archibald) Berkeley Milne (Archibald) David Stirling (Archibald) Havergal Downes-Shaw (Arthur) Berriedale Keith (Arthur) Beverley Baxter (Arthur) Cecil Tyrrell Beck (Arthur) Clive Morrison-Bell (Arthur) Hugh (Elsdale) Molson (Arthur) Mervyn Stockwood (Arthur) Paul Boissier, Harrow Heraldry Committee & Harrow School (Arthur) Trevor Dawson (Arwyn) Lynn Ungoed-Thomas (Basil Arthur) John Peto (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin & New Statesman (Borlasse Elward) Wyndham Childs (Cecil Frederick) Nevil Macready (Cecil George) Graham Hayman (Charles Edward) Howard Vincent (Charles Henry) Collins Baker (Charles) Alexander Harris (Charles) Cyril Clarke (Charles) Edgar Wood (Charles) Edward Troup (Charles) Frederick (Howard) Gough (Charles) Michael Duff (Charles) Philip Fothergill (Charles) Philip Fothergill, Liberal National Organisation, N-E Warwickshire Liberal Association & Rt Hon Charles Albert McCurdy (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett & World Review of Reviews (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Colin) Mark Patrick (Crwfurd) Wilfrid Griffin Eady (Cyril) Berkeley Ormerod (Cyril) Desmond Keeling (Cyril) George Toogood (Cyril) Kenneth Bird (David) Euan Wallace (Davies) Evan Bedford (Denis Duncan)
    [Show full text]
  • St Catherine's College Oxford
    MESSAGES The Year St Catherine’s College . Oxford 2013 ST CATHERINE’S COLLEGE 2013/75 MESSAGES Master and Fellows 2013 MASTER Susan C Cooper, MA (BA Richard M Berry, MA, DPhil Bart B van Es (BA, MPhil, Angela B Brueggemann, Gordon Gancz, BM BCh, MA Collby Maine, PhD California) Tutor in Physics PhD Camb) DPhil (BSc St Olaf, MSc Fellow by Special Election Professor Roger W Professor of Experimental Reader in Condensed Tutor in English Iowa) College Doctor Ainsworth, MA, DPhil, Physics Matter Physics Senior Tutor Fellow by Special Election in FRAeS Biological Sciences Geneviève A D M Peter R Franklin, MA (BA, Ashok I Handa, MA (MB BS Tommaso Pizzari, MA (BSc Wellcome Trust Career Helleringer (Maîtrise FELLOWS DPhil York) Lond), FRCS Aberd, PhD Shef) Development Fellow ESSEC, JD Columbia, Maîtrise Tutor in Music Fellow by Special Election in Tutor in Zoology Sciences Po, Maîtrise, Richard J Parish, MA, DPhil Professor of Music Medicine James E Thomson, MChem, Doctorat Paris-I Panthéon- (BA Newc) Reader in Surgery Byron W Byrne, MA, DPhil DPhil Sorbonne, Maîtrise Paris-II Tutor in French John Charles Smith, MA Tutor for Graduates (BCom, BEng Western Fellow by Special Election in Panthéon-Assas) Philip Spencer Fellow Tutor in French Linguistics Australia) Chemistry Fellow by Special Election Professor of French President of the Senior James L Bennett, MA (BA Tutor in Engineering Science in Law (Leave H14) Common Room Reading) Tutor for Admissions Andrew J Bunker, MA, DPhil Leverhulme Trust Early Fellow by Special Election Tutor in Physics
    [Show full text]
  • Shaping the Inheritance of the Spanish Civil War on the British Left, 1939-1945 a Thesis Submitted to the University of Manches
    Shaping the Inheritance of the Spanish Civil War on the British Left, 1939-1945 A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Master of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2017 David W. Mottram School of Arts, Languages and Cultures Table of contents Abstract p.4 Declaration p.5 Copyright statement p.5 Acknowledgements p.6 Introduction p.7 Terminology, sources and methods p.10 Structure of the thesis p.14 Chapter One The Lost War p.16 1.1 The place of ‘Spain’ in British politics p.17 1.2 Viewing ‘Spain’ through external perspectives p.21 1.3 The dispersal, 1939 p.26 Conclusion p.31 Chapter Two Adjustments to the Lost War p.33 2.1 The Communist Party and the International Brigaders: debt of honour p.34 2.2 Labour’s response: ‘The Spanish agitation had become history’ p.43 2.3 Decline in public and political discourse p.48 2.4 The political parties: three Spanish threads p.53 2.5 The personal price of the lost war p.59 Conclusion p.67 2 Chapter Three The lessons of ‘Spain’: Tom Wintringham, guerrilla fighting, and the British war effort p.69 3.1 Wintringham’s opportunity, 1937-1940 p.71 3.2 ‘The British Left’s best-known military expert’ p.75 3.3 Platform for influence p.79 3.4 Defending Britain, 1940-41 p.82 3.5 India, 1942 p.94 3.6 European liberation, 1941-1944 p.98 Conclusion p.104 Chapter Four The political and humanitarian response of Clement Attlee p.105 4.1 Attlee and policy on Spain p.107 4.2 Attlee and the Spanish Republican diaspora p.113 4.3 The signal was Greece p.119 Conclusion p.125 Conclusion p.127 Bibliography p.133 49,910 words 3 Abstract Complexities and divisions over British left-wing responses to the Spanish Civil War between 1936 and 1939 have been well-documented and much studied.
    [Show full text]
  • 32 Hunter Liberal Reunion 1943-46
    Liberal divisions Ian Hunter looks at the attempts to reunite the Liberal Nationals with the official Liberal Party in the 1940s TheThe finalfinal questquest forfor LiberalLiberal reunionreunion 1943–461943–46 he decline of the Liberal Party as a party of separate organisation from the Samuel-led Liberals Tgovernment during the first half of the twenti- and remained firm supporters of the Tory-domi- eth century was marked by a series of splits and per- nated National Governments. sonal rivalries. Most famous and most damaging was With the formation of Churchill’s Coalition the split in between the followers of H. H. Government in May , the Liberal Nationals and Asquith and David Lloyd George, which saw the Liberals again found themselves working alongside Liberal Party divided in allegiance from top to bot- each other in the national cause. The leaders of both tom until the mid s, although personal animosi- the Liberal Party and the Liberal National Party ties lasted much longer. (Sinclair and Simon) entered the government to- A further fault line divided the party again in the gether with the Labour Party leaders. Sir Archibald early s. This schism centred on a divide between Sinclair took over the responsibilities of the Air those Liberals who followed the then Liberal Party Ministry and Sir John Simon accepted a peerage and Leader and National Government Home Secretary became Lord Chancellor. For the Liberals, Sir Percy Herbert Samuel, and those who aligned themselves Harris became Deputy Leader and Ernest Brown with Sir John Simon, a leading Liberal and Foreign became the leader of the Liberal Nationals in the Secretary under MacDonald.
    [Show full text]
  • 67 Summer 2010
    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 67 / Summer 2010 / £10.00 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y Liberals and the left Matthew Roberts Out of Chartism, into Liberalism Popular radicals and the Liberal Party Michael Freeden The Liberal Party and the New Liberalism John Shepherd The flight from the Liberal PartyLiberals who joined Labour, 1914–31 Matt Cole ‘An out-of-date word’ Jo Grimond and the left Peter Hellyer The Young Liberals and the left, 1965–70 Liberal Democrat History Group Liberal Leaders The latest publication from the Liberal Democrat History Group is Liberal Leaders: Leaders of the Liberal Party, SDP and Liberal Democrats since 1900. The sixty-page booklet contains concise biographies of every Liberal, Social Democrat and Liberal Democrat leader since 1900. The total of sixteen biographies stretches from Henry Campbell-Bannerman to Nick Clegg, including such figures as H. H. Asquith, David Lloyd George, Jo Grimond, David Steel, David Owen and Paddy Ashdown. Liberal Leaders is available to Journal of Liberal History subscribers for the special price of £5 (normal price £6) with free p&p. To order, please send a cheque for £5.00 (made out to ‘Liberal Democrat History Group’) to LDHG, 38 Salford Road, London SW2 4BQ. RESEARCH IN PROGRESS If you can help any of the individuals listed below with sources, contacts, or any other information — or if you know anyone who can — please pass on details to them. Details of other research projects in progress should be sent to the Editor (see page 3) for inclusion here.
    [Show full text]
  • Champion of Liberalism Helen Langley Honor Balfour and the Liberal Party an Archival Perspective Will Pinkney C
    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 78 / Spring 2013 / £6.00 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y Champion of Liberalism Helen Langley Honor Balfour and the Liberal Party An archival perspective Will Pinkney C. E. Montague, Liberal war writers and the Great War Peter Urbach The Reform Club’s Jubilee Ball End of an era Tudor Jones ‘Reluctant’ or Liberal collectivists? The Social Liberalism of Keynes and Beveridge Ruth Polling Mothers of Liberty How modern Liberalism was made by women Liberal Democrat History Group 2 Journal of Liberal History 78 Spring 2013 Journal of Liberal History Issue 78: Spring 2013 The Journal of Liberal History is published quarterly by the Liberal Democrat History Group. ISSN 1479-9642 Liberal history news 4 Editor: Duncan Brack History Group plaque; PhD in political history; Archiving the ‘Red Guard’; The Deputy Editor: Tom Kiehl Liberal Party, Unionism and political culture Assistant Editor: Christine Headley Biographies Editor: Robert Ingham Reviews Editor: Dr Eugenio Biagini Honor Balfour and the Liberal Party 6 Contributing Editors: Graham Lippiatt, Tony Little, An archival perspective; by Helen Langley York Membery C. E. Montague, Liberal war writers and the Great 20 Patrons Dr Eugenio Biagini; Professor Michael Freeden; War Professor John Vincent Will Pinkney examines the war writings of a Liberal author Editorial Board Letters to the Editor 25 Dr Malcolm Baines; Dr Ian Cawood; Dr Roy Douglas; D. S. Macdonald (David Steel); Immigration (Sandy S. Waugh); Roy Jenkins and Dr David Dutton; Prof. David Gowland; Prof. Richard Lloyd George (Alan Mumford); C. L. Mowat and Lloyd George (Rufus Adams) Grayson; Dr Michael Hart; Peter Hellyer; Dr Alison Holmes; Dr J.
    [Show full text]
  • And Hetta, Lady Empson
    CORRESPONDENCE AND OTHER PAPERS OF SIR WILLIAM EMPSON (1906 – 1984) and HETTA, LADY EMPSON, (1915 – 1996) [DEN, DEN(2) & DEN(3)] Catalogued by: The University of Hull Brynmor Jones Library 2004 CONTENTS Page no. Introduction DEN 1 William Empson: dated letters and other manuscripts, 1 1915-1982 2 William Empson: undated letters 24 3 Hetta Empson: letters written mainly before she met William 28 Empson, 1938-1943 4 Hetta Empson: correspondence with Walter Brown, David 43 Jones and others, 1947-1982 5 Hetta Empson: letters written whilst in China, 1947-1952 55 6 Hetta Empson: letters to William Empson, 1948-1972 73 7 Miscellaneous documents, 1934-2000 97 8 Correspondence with Dr John Henry (David) Jones, 98 1976-1982 DEN(2) Fragmentary letters, 1948-1950 Letters from Hetta Empson to Walter Brown, 1952-1957 Letters from Hetta Empson to Walter Brown, 1968-1996 Letters from Walter Brown to Hetta Empson, 1950-1953 Miscellaneous, 1948-1979 DEN(3) INTRODUCTION William Empson - university teacher, poet, and literary analyst and critic - was born on 27 September 1906 at Yokefleet Hall, near Howden, East Yorkshire, and was the youngest son of Arthur Reginald Empson and his wife Laura, daughter of Richard Micklethwaite, of Ardsley House, Yorkshire. The Empson family had lived in East Yorkshire since at least the mid-17th century, building the Tudor-style Yokefleet Hall in about 1870. The Estate remained in the family until the late 1970s, with successive generations of close relatives visiting the Hall during vacations. Empson’s father died when William was ten. The boy’s formal education began at Pretoria (or Praetoria) House, West Folkestone, and in 1920 he won a scholarship to Winchester College.
    [Show full text]
  • Juliet Rhys-Williams and the Campaign for Basic Income, 1942-55
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Apollo Beveridge’s rival: Juliet Rhys-Williams and the campaign for basic income, 1942-55 Peter Sloman, New College, Oxford Postal address: New College, Oxford, OX1 3BN Email: [email protected] Telephone: 07787 114629 Abstract: Historians of Britain’s post-war welfare state have long been aware of the shortcomings of the social insurance model, but the political impact of the Beveridge report has tended to obscure the alternative visions of welfare canvassed in the 1940s and 1950s. This article examines the social activist Juliet Rhys-Williams’ campaign for the integration of the tax and benefit systems and the provision of a universal basic income, which attracted wide interest from economists, journalists, and Liberal and Conservative politicians during and after the Second World War. Though Rhys-Williams’ proposals were not adopted, they helped establish a distinctive ‘social market’ perspective on welfare provision which has become central to British social policy debates since the 1960s and 1970s. Acknowledgements: I would like to thank Ben Jackson, Taku Eriguchi, Bill Jordan, Philippe van Parijs, and Malcolm Torry for helpful comments on earlier versions of this article. I am also grateful for valuable feedback from participants at the Women in British Politics conference at the University of Lincoln in May 2011 and the Modern British History seminar at the University of Oxford in January 2015, and from the anonymous Contemporary British History reviewers. 1 Beveridge’s rival: Juliet Rhys-Williams and the campaign for basic income, 1942-55 Historians of the development of Britain’s post-war welfare state have long been aware that they are dealing with a paradox.
    [Show full text]
  • Coversheet for Thesis in Sussex Research Online
    A University of Sussex DPhil thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details A Moral Business: British Quaker work with Refugees from Fascism, 1933-39 Rose Holmes Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Sussex December 2013 i I hereby declare that this thesis has not been, and will not be, submitted in whole or in part to another University for the award of any other degree. Signature: ii University of Sussex Rose Holmes PhD Thesis A Moral Business: British Quaker work with Refugees from Fascism, 1933-39 Summary This thesis details the previously under-acknowledged work of British Quakers with refugees from fascism in the period leading up to the Second World War. This work can be characterised as distinctly Quaker in origin, complex in organisation and grassroots in implementation. The first chapter establishes how interwar British Quakers were able to mobilise existing networks and values of humanitarian intervention to respond rapidly to the European humanitarian crisis presented by fascism. The Spanish Civil War saw the lines between legal social work and illegal resistance become blurred, forcing British Quaker workers to question their own and their country’s official neutrality in the face of fascism.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberal Post-War By-Elections the Inverness Turning Point
    LIBERAL POST-WAR BY-ELECTIONS THE INVERNESS TURNING POINT The by-election HE 1951 election is widely broad front of 475 in 1950, inevi- accepted as the low point tably meant a drastic reduction victories at Torrington in Liberal general elec- in the total number of votes in 1958 and Orpington tion performance. It cast for the party. The Liberals’ saw the party’s lowest share of the vote collapsed to in 1962 confirmed Tshare of the total vote, lowest 2.5 per cent, down from 9.1 per that the Liberal Party’s number of candidates and a fall cent in 1950. The party polled in the number of MPs elected only 730,556 votes, compared to recovery from its to its lowest level at a general 2,621,548 in 1950. election.1 At the following gen- The most high-profile casu- low point of the 1951 eral election in 1955 the average alty among the Liberal MPs at general election – only share of the vote per Liberal the 1951 election was the party’s candidate increased slightly, to Deputy Leader, Megan Lloyd about a hundrded 15.1 per cent from 14.7 per cent. George, who lost Anglesey to candidates, only six Fewer deposits were lost in 1955, Labour by 595 votes, after hav- despite an increase of one in ing represented the constitu- of whom were elected the number of candidates. All ency without a break since 1929. – was under way. But six Liberal MPs who fought the Emrys Roberts lost Merioneth, 1955 election were returned – the also to Labour.
    [Show full text]
  • From Smoke to Smother
    From Smoke to Smother (1938 - 1948) A Sequel to Insanity Fair by Douglas Reed * Then must I from the smoke into the smother; From tyrant duke unto a tyrant brother. A comment on the twentieth century by William Shakespeare * published: 1948 - this PDF prepared by www.douglasreed.co.uk CONTENTS Foreword: Vienna, 1938 Part One – The Smoke: 1933 - 1939 06 Moat Defensive 07 The Blessed Boskage 01 Dinner With A Condemned Man 08 The Caves Of Caen 02 Delicate-Handed Priest 09 The Man At The Pyramid’s Peak 03 The Lonely Kings 10 Charm The Narrow Seas 04 The Wrecker 11 The War Behind The War 05 Between Two Thieves 12 Fissionary Society 06 Longest Night 13 A Thief Or Two … 07 Clamorous Harbinger 14 In Unknown England 08 The Puppets Dance Part Three – The Smother: 1945 – 1950 - Part Two – The Fire: 1940 - 1945 01 Nor Never Shall … 01 Warm September Eve 02 The Second Interregnum? 02 On Boiling Boots 03 Spirit Of Mischief 04 Husarenfieber Part Four – The Fulminant Fifties: 1950 - 05 Crisis On The Isis Epilogue: Ten Times April Postscript FOREWORD Vienna 1938 When this book appears just ten years will have passed since the publication of the one, Insanity Fair, to which it is a sequel. The shape of events, as they have come about, may now be compared with the shape of the forebodings and warnings which filled Insanity Fair; and, when that has been done, the prospect of the next ten years, 1948-58 may be examined. Has the enpested air of the twentieth century at last been cleared? In my opinion the answer is plainly, No.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 Journal of Liberal History 66 Spring 2010 Violet & Clem ‘The Only Purpose Iolet Bonham Carter Car Accident in December 1909
    20 Journal of Liberal History 66 Spring 2010 VIolet & Clem ‘The only purpose iolet Bonham Carter car accident in December 1909. wa s bor n Violet During the terrible carnage of the of politics is the Asquith on 15 April Great War, she lost many of her expression of one’s 1887 in Hampstead, closest friends as well as one of her London, the only brothers. Political problems mul- deepest convictions – Vdaughter and the fourth of the tiplied, too. Her father, who had five children of Herbert Henry succeeded Sir Henry Campbell- and their translation Asquith and his first wife Helen Bannerman as Liberal premier in into facts.’ Lady Violet Kensall, who died prematurely April 1908, was ousted from office of typhoid fever in 1891 when her at the height of the war in Decem- Bonham Carter.1 daughter was only four years of ber 1916 – in Violet’s eyes through age. The following year her father the ‘treachery’ of the conspira- Dr J. Graham became Home Secretary in Glad- torial Lloyd George. Asquith’s Jones examines stone’s last administration, and in subsequent defeat in East Fife, in 1895 he married his second wife, the ‘coupon’ general election of the contentious Margot Tennant, who thereafter December 1918, made his humili- became an important influence in ation complete and convinced his relationship between her step-daughter’s life. Violet’s ever-loyal daughter that she must education (rather like that of her strive to defend his reputation for Clement Davies, leader eventual arch-rival, Lady Megan the rest of her days.
    [Show full text]