DOCSLIB.ORG

ANNUAL REPORT Public Joint Stock Company Interregional Distribution Grid Company of Center and Volga Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ANNUAL REPORT Public Joint Stock Company Interregional Distribution Grid Company of Center and Volga Region Approved by the decision of the General Shareholders Meeting of PJSC IDGC of Center and Volga Region Minutes No.11 as of June 06, 2017 Preliminarily approved by the decision of the Board of Directors of PJSC IDGC of Center and Volga Region Minutes No. 267 as of May 02, 2017 ANNUAL REPORT Public Joint Stock Company Interregional Distribution Grid Company of Center and Volga Region for 2016 Acting General Director of PJSC IDGC of Center and Volga Region O Yu. Isaev Nizhny Novgorod 2017 PJSC IDGC of Center and Volga Region management is performed in conformity with the requirements of ISO 9001, OHSAS 18001, ISO 14001 and ISO 50001 Contents 1. COMPANY PROFILE .................................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1. COMPANY OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2. COMPANY'S SHARES ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.3. KEY EVENTS IN 2016 .................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.4. HISTORY OF INDUSTRY AND THE COMPANY........................................................................................................................ 9 1.5. OPERATING RESULTS ................................................................................................................................................... 11 1.6. INVESTMENT ATTRACTIVENESS ...................................................................................................................................... 13 1.7. COMMISSIONING OF NEW CAPACITIES OF PRIORITIZED FACILITIES ......................................................................................... 14 1.8. STRUCTURE OF THE COMPANY ...................................................................................................................................... 16 1.9. FOOTPRINT MAP ........................................................................................................................................................ 17 1.10. ADDRESS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVES..................................................................................................................................... 18 2. STRATEGY AND DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS ............................................................................................................... 20 2.1. POSITION IN THE INDUSTRY AND OPERATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 20 2.2. BUSINESS MODEL ............................................................................................................................................................. 22 2.3. MISSION, MAIN OBJECTIVES AND PRIORITIES ......................................................................................................................... 24 2.3.1. KPI in the Strategic Planning System .................................................................................................................... 25 2.3.2. Strategic Objectives and their Fulfillment ............................................................................................................ 27 2.3.3. Report of the Board of Directors on Priority Areas............................................................................................... 31 2.4. QUALITY POLICY ............................................................................................................................................................... 33 2.5. RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM .............................................................................................................................................. 35 2.6. INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES ..................................................................................................................................................... 44 2.6.1. Investment Program Development ...................................................................................................................... 44 2.6.2. Capital Construction Quality Management ......................................................................................................... 54 2.6.3. Long-Term Development ...................................................................................................................................... 57 3. REPORT ON PRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 63 3.1. OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................................................................... 63 3.2. POWER TRANSMISSION ...................................................................................................................................................... 65 3.3. TECHNOLOGICAL CONNECTION TO GRIDS .............................................................................................................................. 69 3.4. OTHER ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................................................................................ 74 3.5 INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................................................................ 74 3.5.1. Energy Saving and Energy Efficiency Improvement ............................................................................................. 82 3.5.2. Reactive Power Flow Management ..................................................................................................................... 85 3.5.3. Operative and Technological Process Control ...................................................................................................... 88 3.5.4. Information Technologies and Telecommunications ........................................................................................... 90 3.6. TECHNICAL POLICY ............................................................................................................................................................ 93 3.7. POWER SUPPLY RELIABILITY ................................................................................................................................................ 96 3.7.1. Reliability Assurance ............................................................................................................................................ 96 3.7.2. Repair and Maintenance ...................................................................................................................................... 96 3.7.3. Emergency Prevention and Response at Power Distribution Grid Facilities ......................................................... 98 3.8. CONSOLIDATION OF POWER GRID ASSETS ........................................................................................................................... 101 3.9. DECREASE IN ENERGY LOSSES ............................................................................................................................................ 102 3.10. ORGANIZATION OF INTERACTION WITH SERVICE CONSUMERS ................................................................................................ 103 4. SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING .................................................................................................................................... 107 4.1. FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................................................... 107 4.1.1. Accounting Policy ............................................................................................................................................... 107 4.1.2. Analysis of Financial Performance under RAS .................................................................................................... 107 2 4.1.3. Capital Structure ................................................................................................................................................ 113 4.1.4. Credit Policy ........................................................................................................................................................ 117 4.1.5. Tariff policy......................................................................................................................................................... 120 4.1.6. Procurement Activities ....................................................................................................................................... 132 4.2. HUMAN RESOURCES POLICY ............................................................................................................................................. 134 4.2.1. HR Policy............................................................................................................................................................. 134 4.2.2. KPIs and Information on their Achievement....................................................................................................... 143 4.3. SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Contemporary Urban Russian Funerals 109
    Contemporary Urban Russian Funerals 109 Contemporary Urban Russian Funerals: Continuity and Change Jeanmarie Rouhier-Willoughby University of Kentucky Про похороны интереснее рассказывать, потому что в похоронном обряде сохранились традиции глубже всего. Потому что тут, какими бы ни были люди далекими от всего, образованными, страшными консерваторами, тут надо все соблюсти. It is more interesting to talk about funerals because, in the funerary ritual, traditions have been preserved best of all. Because here, no matter how far people were from everything, whether educated, whether frightfully conservative, here everything has to be observed. So said Ekaterina Z., an informant from Novosibirsk, born in 1978. While Ekaterina’s opinion has some merit, as we will see, the urban Russian funeral has not been a stable ritual throughout the 20th and 21st centuries. In fact, it reflects attitudes from both the Soviet period and the post-Soviet period, attitudes which demonstrate how social values have changed over these periods. This paper is based on thirty interviews about funerals with residents of Novosibirsk and Vladimir, Russia (or with emigres to America). The informants ranged in age from 26 to 73 years of age and included 25 women and 5 men. 27 were Russian; the remaining three identified themselves as Tatar, Bashkir or Mordvin. They are representatives of the urban working and middle classes; most attended VUZy (institutions of higher education). 17 were from Novosibirsk and 13 from Vladimir. Most of the funerals they described took place in those locations between 1966 and 2003, although one funeral took place in Chita. In order to evaluate the validity of Ekaterina’s statement, we must first examine the traditional 19th century village funeral.
    [Show full text]
  • Atmospheric Impacts of the 2010 Russian Wildfires: Integrating
    Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 10031–10056, 2011 www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/10031/2011/ Atmospheric doi:10.5194/acp-11-10031-2011 Chemistry © Author(s) 2011. CC Attribution 3.0 License. and Physics Atmospheric impacts of the 2010 Russian wildfires: integrating modelling and measurements of an extreme air pollution episode in the Moscow region I. B. Konovalov1,2, M. Beekmann2, I. N. Kuznetsova3, A. Yurova3, and A. M. Zvyagintsev4 1Institute of Applied Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Nizhniy Novgorod, Russia 2Laboratoire Inter-Universitaire de Systemes` Atmospheriques,´ CNRS, UMR7583, Universite´ Paris-Est and Universite´ Paris 7, Creteil,´ France 3Hydrometeorological Centre of Russia, Moscow, Russia 4Central Aerological Laboratory, Dolgoprudny, Russia Received: 15 March 2011 – Published in Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.: 19 April 2011 Revised: 16 September 2011 – Accepted: 27 September 2011 – Published: 4 October 2011 Abstract. Numerous wildfires provoked by an unprece- uation. Indeed, ozone concentrations were simulated to be dented intensive heat wave caused continuous episodes of episodically very large (>400 µg m−3) even when fire emis- extreme air pollution in several Russian cities and densely sions were omitted in the model. It was found that fire emis- populated regions, including the Moscow region. This paper sions increased ozone production by providing precursors for analyzes the evolution of the surface concentrations of CO, ozone formation (mainly VOC), but also inhibited the pho- PM10 and ozone over the Moscow region during the 2010 tochemistry by absorbing and scattering solar radiation. In heat wave by integrating available ground based and satel- contrast, diagnostic model runs indicate that ozone concen- lite measurements with results of a mesoscale model.
    [Show full text]
  • Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University
    RUSSIAN GEOGRAPHICAL SOCIETY FACULTY OF GEOGRAPHY, LOMONOSOV MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHY, RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES No. 04 (v. 08) 2015 GEOGRAPHY ENVIRONMENT SUSTAINABILITY EDITORIAL BOARD EDITORSINCHIEF: Kasimov Nikolay S. Kotlyakov Vladimir M. Vandermotten Christian Lomonosov Moscow State Russian Academy of Sciences Université Libre de Bruxelles, University, Faculty of Geography, Institute of Geography, Belgium 04|2015 Russia Russia Tikunov Vladimir S. (Secretary-General) Kroonenberg Salomon Lomonosov Moscow State University, Delft University of Technology 2 GES Faculty of Geography, Russia Department of Applied Earth Sciences, Baklanov Alexander The Netherlands Danish Meteorological Institute, Kulmala Markku Denmark University of Helsinki, Division of Baklanov Petr Ya. Atmospheric Sciences, Finland Russian Academy of Sciences, Malkhazova Svetlana M. Pacific Institute of Geography, Russia Lomonosov Moscow State University, Chalkley Brian Faculty of Geography, Russia University of Plymouth, UK Meadows Michael E. Chubarova Natalya E. University of Cape Town, Department Lomonosov Moscow State University, of Environmental and Geographical Sciences Faculty of Geography, Russia South Africa De Maeyer Philippe Nefedova Tatyana G. Ghent University, Russian Academy of Sciences, Department of Geography, Belgium Institute of Geography, Russia Dobrolubov Sergey A. O’Loughlin John Lomonosov Moscow State University, University of Colorado at Boulder, Faculty of Geography, Russia Institute of Behavioral Sciences, USA Haigh Martin Pedroli Bas Oxford Brookes University, Wageningen University, Department of Social Sciences, UK The Netherlands Gulev Sergey K. Radovanovic Milan Russian Academy of Sciences, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Institute of Oceanology, Russia Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić”, Serbia Guo Huadong Sokratov Sergei A. Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Institute of Remote Sensing Faculty of Geography, Russia and Digital Earth, China Solomina Olga N.
    [Show full text]
  • Флуктуационная Изменчивость И Биомасса Листовых Пластин Древесных Растений Influence of Fluctuation Variability on Wood Plants 1Баранов С.Г., 2Усков М.В
    1 2 1. ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ИЗУЧЕНИИ БОТАНИКИ И МИКОЛОГИИ 575.174.015.3 ФЛУКТУАЦИОННАЯ ИЗМЕНЧИВОСТЬ И БИОМАССА ЛИСТОВЫХ ПЛАСТИН ДРЕВЕСНЫХ РАСТЕНИЙ INFLUENCE OF FLUCTUATION VARIABILITY ON WOOD PLANTS 1Баранов С.Г., 2Усков М.В. Владимирский государственный университет им. А.Г. и Н.Г. Столетовых Педагогический институт, кафедра биологического и географического образования, 1 – доцент кафедры БГО, 2 – старший преподаватель кафедры БГО Аннотация: Флуктуационная изменчивость, как вид фенотипической изменчивости, выражается в колебании фенотипических проявлений. Поведенная работа показывает, что колебания в ненаправленной (флуктуирующей) асимметрии листовых пластин древесных видов, как и их биомасса, связаны с климатическими факторами, с географическими особенностями популяций и различаются у разных древесных видов Ключевые слова: флуктуационная изменчивость, видовое различие, географическая изменчивость Abstract: Fluctuation variability, as a type of phenotypic variability is expressed in the fluctuation of phenotypic features. The study showed that fluctuations in the non-directional (fluctuating) asymmetry and biomass of leaf plates of woody species are associated with climatic factors and with geographical features of populations. Key words: fluctuation variability, species variety, geographical variability При изучении темы «Изменчивость» фенотипическая и генотипическая типы изменчивости часто противопоставляются, при этом теряется холистический смысл изменчивости, при которой играют роль как внутриядерные хромосомные и протеиновые
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution # 784 of the Government of the Russian Federation Dated July
    Resolution # 784 of the Government of the Russian Federation dated July 17, 1998 On the List of Joint-Stock Companies Producing Goods (Products, Services) of Strategic Importance for Safeguarding National Security of the State with Federally-Owned Shares Not to Be Sold Ahead of Schedule (Incorporates changes and additions of August 7, August 14, October 31, November 14, December 18, 1998; February 27, August 30, September 3, September 9, October 16, December 31, 1999; March 16, October 19, 2001; and May 15, 2002) In connection with the Federal Law “On Privatization of State Property and Fundamental Principles of Privatizing Municipal Property in the Russian Federation”, and in accordance with paragraph 1 of Decree # 478 of the President of the Russian Federation dated May 11, 1995 “On Measures to Guarantee the Accommodation of Privatization Revenues in thee Federal Budget” (Sobraniye Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 1995, # 20, page 1776; 1996, # 39, page 4531; 1997, # 5, page 658; # 20, page 2240), the Government of the Russian Federation has resolved: 1. To adopt the List of Joint-Stock Companies Producing Goods (Products, Services) of Strategic Importance for Safeguarding National Security of the State with Federally-Owned Shares Not to Be Sold Ahead of Schedule (attached). In accordance with Decree # 1514 of the President of the Russian Federation dated December 21, 2001, pending the adoption by the President of the Russian Federation in concordance with Article 6 of the Federal Law “On Privatization of State and Municipal Property” of lists of strategic enterprises and strategic joint-stock companies, changes and additions to the list of joint-stock companies adopted by this Resolution shall bee introduced by Resolutions of the Government of the Russian Federation issued on the basis of Decrees of the President of the Russian Federation.
    [Show full text]
  • Expansions of Plant Species to the Flora of Vladimir Oblast (Russia) in the Last Decade
    ISSN 20751117, Russian Journal of Biological Invasions, 2015, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 202–221. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2015. Original Russian Text © A.P. Seregin, 2015, published in Rossiiskii Zhurnal Biologicheskikh Invasii, 2015, No. 2, pp. 101–127. Expansions of Plant Species to the Flora of Vladimir Oblast (Russia) in the Last Decade. Second Report A. P. Seregin Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991 Russia email: [email protected] Received January 20, 2014 Abstract—The second report reviews naturalization and expansion of ten vascular plant species in Vladimir oblast (Russia) in the last decade. All records of Acer tataricum L., Amelanchier × spicata (Lam.) K. Koch, Bidens frondosa L., Cuscuta campestris Yuncker, Galinsoga quadriradiata Ruiz et Pav., Nuttallanthus canaden sis (L.) D.A. Sutton, Poa supina Schrad., Rosa villosa L., Rumex stenophyllus Ledeb., and Zizania palustris L. since the first record until the end of 2013 are summarized. Series of grid maps for each species (dated 2007, 2011, and 2013), frequency of occurrence, ecological preferences, earlier reports from neighboring regions, and probable invasion routes are discussed. The data on further fouryear expansion (2010–2013) are pre sented for ten species characterized in the first report: Epilobium tetragonum L., Hypochoeris radicata L., Ambrosia trifida L., Erigeron × huelsenii Vatke (E. droebachiensis auct.), Aronia mitschurinii A.K. Skvortsov et Maitul., Trifolium fragiferum L., Phragmites altissimus (Benth.) Mabille, Schedonorus arundinaceus (Schreb.) Dumort., Vicia villosa Roth, and Galega orientalis Lam. Keywords: flora, Vladimir oblast, alien plant species, naturalization, invasion DOI: 10.1134/S2075111715030066 INTRODUCTION this creates a significant bias in distribution data on alien plant species, even in adjacent regions.
    [Show full text]
  • 4160 EE Lighting Final Evaluation Report.Pdf
    United Nations Development Programme Government of the Russian Federation Terminal Evaluation of UNDP/GEF Project: TRAnsforming the Market for Efficient Lighting (TRAMEL) (GEF Project ID: 3658; UNDP PIMS ID: 4160) Terminal Evaluation Report Mission Members: Mr. Roland Wong, International Consultant Mr. Alexei Zakharov, National Consultant May 2017 UNDP – Government of the Russian Federation Terminal Evaluation of Transforming the Market for Efficient Lighting TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SYNOPSIS .............................................................................................................................................................. III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................... IV ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................................. VIII 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE EVALUATION ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 STRUCTURE OF THE EVALUATION ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Departure City City ​​Of Delivery Region Delivery Delivery Time
    Cost of Estimated Departure city city ​​of delivery Region delivery delivery time Moscow Ababurovo Moscow 655 1 Moscow Abaza The Republic of Khakassia 1401 6 Moscow Abakan The Republic of Khakassia 722 2 Moscow Abbakumova Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Abdrakhmanovo Republic of Tatarstan 682 on request Moscow Abdreevo Ulyanovsk region 1360 5 Moscow Abdulov Ulyanovsk region 1360 5 Moscow Abinsk Krasnodar region 682 3 Moscow Abramovka Ulyanovsk region 1360 5 Moscow Abramovskikh Sverdlovsk region 1360 1 Moscow Abramtsevo Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Abramtzevo (Dmitrovsky reg) Moscow region 1360 3 Moscow Abrau Durso Krasnodar region 682 1 Moscow Avvakumova Tver region 655 5 Moscow Avdotyino Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Avdotyino (Stupinsky reg) Moscow region 1360 1 Averkieva Moscow Moscow region 1360 2 (Pavlovsky Posadskiy reg) Aviation workers Moscow Moscow region 1360 1 (Odintsovskiy-one) Moscow aviators Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Aviation Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Aviation Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Motorist Arhangelsk region 655 1 Moscow avtopoligone Moscow region 1360 3 Moscow Autoroute Moscow region 655 1 Moscow agarin Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Agarin (Stupinsky reg) Moscow region 1360 1 Moscow Agafonov Moscow region 655 1 Moscow AGAFONOVA (Odintsovskiy-one) Moscow region 1360 1 Moscow Agashkino Moscow region 655 5 Moscow Ageevka Oryol Region 655 1 Moscow Agidel Republic of Bashkortostan 1360 3 Moscow Agha Krasnodar region 682 3 Moscow Agrarnik Tver region 1306 6 Moscow agricultural Republic of Crimea 682 4 Moscow agrogorodok Moscow region
    [Show full text]
  • PDABL417.Pdf
    1 INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORPORATION FINAL FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL REPORT USAID Grant CCS-0005-G-00-2023-00 Small-Scale Privatization June 1995 I SUMMARY OF CONTENTS This document contains final financial report as well as summary descriptions of the International Finance Corporation's privatization-related activities in the former Soviet Union funded under USAID Grant #CCS-0005-G-00-2023-00 (funding period 5/26/92- 2/28/95). Under this grant, IFC completed or initiated the following projects: Equipment Purchase for GKI in Russia (completed); Small-Scale Privatization in Russia (completed); Trucking Transport Privatization in Russia (completed); Land Privatization in Russia (ongoing with British financing); Small-Scale Privatization in Ukraine (ongoing with new USAE) financing); Small-Scale Privatization in Belarus (ongoing with new USAE) financing). For each project, the summary descriptions cover IFC's design and implementation of the pilot phase; pilot results; expansion; and total results to date. FINAL FINANCIAL REPORT International Finance Corporation June 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS Statement of Cash Receipts, Disbursements and Grant Balance .................. 3 Financial Report .............................................. 4 Equipment Inventory .......................................... 19 .y International Finance Corporation USAID Grant #CCS-0005-G-00-2023-00 Small-Scale Privatization Grant Period May 26, 1992 - February 28, 1995 Statement of Cash Receipts, Disbursements and Grant Balance (Expressed in US dollars) Receipts Contributions
    [Show full text]
  • Владимирская Область Vladimir Region
    Владимирская область территория делового благоприятствования VLADIMIR REGION WELCOME TO VISIT AND DO BUSINESS IN СОЦИАЛЬно-ЭКоноМиЧесКое РАЗвитие ОБЛАСТИ SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE REGION инвестиЦионный КлиМат владиМирсКой области INVESTMENT CLIMATE OF THE VLADIMIR REGION ЗаКОНОДАТЕЛЬСТВО в ИНВЕСТИЦионной сФере LEGISLATION IN THE INVESTMENT SPHERE СТРУКтУРА ОРГАНОВ ВЛАСТИ ВЛАдиМИРСКой ОБЛАСТИ THE VLADIMIR REGION GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE МЕСТОПОЛОЖение LOCATION владимирская область расположена в европей- The Vladimir region is located in the center of the ской части российской Федерации, граничит с European part of Russia, borders on the Moscow, Московской, рязанской, нижегородской, ива- Ryazan, Nizhniy Novgorod, Ivanovo and Yaroslavl новской и ярославской областями. площадь – Regions. The area totals 29 thousand square kilo- 29 тысяч квадратных километров. meters. территорию региона пересекает международ- The region’s territory is crossed by the interna- ный транспортный коридор и разветвленная tional transport corridor and a ramified network сеть автомобильных и железных дорог. of motorways and railways. ИСТОРИЧесКая HISTORICAL СПРАВКа BACKGROUND владимирская область – один из древнейших ис- The Vladimir region is one of the ancient historical торико-художественных центров русской земли. тер- and artistic centers of the Russian land. Its territory is the ритории, которые в нее входят, издавна составляли kernel of the Vladimir-Suzdal Knyazhestvo (the Vladimir ядро владимиро-суздальского княжества, а с конца Gubernia from the end
    [Show full text]
  • 'Habitation Comfort' Indicators for Areal Comparison in Central Russia
    HUMAN GEOGRAPHIES Journal of Studies and Research in Human Geography 6.2 (2012) 55-61. ISSN-print: 1843-6587/$-see back cover; ISSN-online: 2067 2284-open access www.humangeographies.org.ro (c) Human Geographies Journal of Studies and Research in Human Geography (c) The authors FOR AREAL COMPARISON IN CENTRAL RUSSIA a, Alexey Krasnoshchekovb, Natalia Mishchenkob* a Soil Science Department, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow , Rusia b Ecological Department, Vladimir State University, Vladimir, Russia Abstract: health in the Vladimir region, located in Central Russia. We present a conceptual model based on the literature which led us to include three groups of factors for assessing population habitation comfort: natural-anthropogenic, social and medical- -economic conditions, a single database has been developed Higher comfort level is associated with better social-economic conditions, and also with proximity to major economically developed regions like Moscow and Nizhniy Novgorod. The lowest comfort level index was detected in the regions with the worst natural-anthropogenic and social-economic conditions. In further analysis, demographic conditions in the Vladimir region were evaluated by administrative region, and medical-ecological zoning was carried out based on principal causes of diseases affecting the population. Key words: Health, Population, Pollution, Questionnaire, Modelling. Article Info: Manuscript Received: September 10, 2012; Revised: November 26, 2012; Accepted: November 28, 2012; Online: November 30, 2012. Introduction comfort has become a very important issue. For Nowadays many researchers deal with these diverse instance, by comparing habitation comfort levels aspects of habitation conditions assessment in alongside health indices, it is possible to view an various regions. For instance, in medical geography integrated criterion to describe the situation in the the reasons of endemic diseases origin, connected region as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Demographic Potential of the Klyazma River Basin-History of Development and Present State
    Modern Applied Science; Vol. 9, No. 2; 2015 ISSN 1913-1844 E-ISSN 1913-1852 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Demographic Potential of the Klyazma River Basin-History of Development and Present State Trifonova Tatiana Anatolievna1 & Repkin Roman Vladimirovich2 1 Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia 2 Vladimir State University named after Alexander and Nikolay Stoletovs, Vladimir, Russia Correspondence: Trifonova Tatiana Anatolievna, Lomonosov Moscow State University, GSP-1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Received: October 15, 2014 Accepted: October 25, 2014 Online Published: December 7, 2014 doi:10.5539/mas.v9n2p78 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/mas.v9n2p78 Abstract The aim of this research is to analyze the demographic situation of the river Klyazma basin in the post-Soviet period and throughout the history of development and settlement of the region; identification of the major centres of vectors differentiation of population development in the examined basin; analysis of socio-economic, natural and environmental factors affecting the population distribution within the basin and demographic processes that are typical for the region. We must take into account that the population demographics of the region is largely dependent on diversity and state of resources of the area and their involvement into the economic sphere, however, it is obvious that the state of the economy is also a key factor in ensuring the sustainability of ecosystems and geo-systems of the river basin. The river Klyazma basin area has a long historical path of development and transformation of natural systems into natural and man-made landscape complexes.
    [Show full text]