DOCSLIB.ORG

ANNUAL REPORT Public Joint Stock Company Interregional Distribution Grid Company of Center and Volga Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ANNUAL REPORT Public Joint Stock Company Interregional Distribution Grid Company of Center and Volga Region Approved by the decision of the General Shareholders Meeting of PJSC IDGC of Center and Volga Region Minutes No.11 as of June 06, 2017 Preliminarily approved by the decision of the Board of Directors of PJSC IDGC of Center and Volga Region Minutes No. 267 as of May 02, 2017 ANNUAL REPORT Public Joint Stock Company Interregional Distribution Grid Company of Center and Volga Region for 2016 Acting General Director of PJSC IDGC of Center and Volga Region O Yu. Isaev Nizhny Novgorod 2017 PJSC IDGC of Center and Volga Region management is performed in conformity with the requirements of ISO 9001, OHSAS 18001, ISO 14001 and ISO 50001 Contents 1. COMPANY PROFILE .................................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1. COMPANY OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2. COMPANY'S SHARES ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.3. KEY EVENTS IN 2016 .................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.4. HISTORY OF INDUSTRY AND THE COMPANY........................................................................................................................ 9 1.5. OPERATING RESULTS ................................................................................................................................................... 11 1.6. INVESTMENT ATTRACTIVENESS ...................................................................................................................................... 13 1.7. COMMISSIONING OF NEW CAPACITIES OF PRIORITIZED FACILITIES ......................................................................................... 14 1.8. STRUCTURE OF THE COMPANY ...................................................................................................................................... 16 1.9. FOOTPRINT MAP ........................................................................................................................................................ 17 1.10. ADDRESS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVES..................................................................................................................................... 18 2. STRATEGY AND DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS ............................................................................................................... 20 2.1. POSITION IN THE INDUSTRY AND OPERATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 20 2.2. BUSINESS MODEL ............................................................................................................................................................. 22 2.3. MISSION, MAIN OBJECTIVES AND PRIORITIES ......................................................................................................................... 24 2.3.1. KPI in the Strategic Planning System .................................................................................................................... 25 2.3.2. Strategic Objectives and their Fulfillment ............................................................................................................ 27 2.3.3. Report of the Board of Directors on Priority Areas............................................................................................... 31 2.4. QUALITY POLICY ............................................................................................................................................................... 33 2.5. RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM .............................................................................................................................................. 35 2.6. INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES ..................................................................................................................................................... 44 2.6.1. Investment Program Development ...................................................................................................................... 44 2.6.2. Capital Construction Quality Management ......................................................................................................... 54 2.6.3. Long-Term Development ...................................................................................................................................... 57 3. REPORT ON PRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 63 3.1. OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................................................................... 63 3.2. POWER TRANSMISSION ...................................................................................................................................................... 65 3.3. TECHNOLOGICAL CONNECTION TO GRIDS .............................................................................................................................. 69 3.4. OTHER ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................................................................................ 74 3.5 INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................................................................ 74 3.5.1. Energy Saving and Energy Efficiency Improvement ............................................................................................. 82 3.5.2. Reactive Power Flow Management ..................................................................................................................... 85 3.5.3. Operative and Technological Process Control ...................................................................................................... 88 3.5.4. Information Technologies and Telecommunications ........................................................................................... 90 3.6. TECHNICAL POLICY ............................................................................................................................................................ 93 3.7. POWER SUPPLY RELIABILITY ................................................................................................................................................ 96 3.7.1. Reliability Assurance ............................................................................................................................................ 96 3.7.2. Repair and Maintenance ...................................................................................................................................... 96 3.7.3. Emergency Prevention and Response at Power Distribution Grid Facilities ......................................................... 98 3.8. CONSOLIDATION OF POWER GRID ASSETS ........................................................................................................................... 101 3.9. DECREASE IN ENERGY LOSSES ............................................................................................................................................ 102 3.10. ORGANIZATION OF INTERACTION WITH SERVICE CONSUMERS ................................................................................................ 103 4. SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING .................................................................................................................................... 107 4.1. FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................................................... 107 4.1.1. Accounting Policy ............................................................................................................................................... 107 4.1.2. Analysis of Financial Performance under RAS .................................................................................................... 107 2 4.1.3. Capital Structure ................................................................................................................................................ 113 4.1.4. Credit Policy ........................................................................................................................................................ 117 4.1.5. Tariff policy......................................................................................................................................................... 120 4.1.6. Procurement Activities ....................................................................................................................................... 132 4.2. HUMAN RESOURCES POLICY ............................................................................................................................................. 134 4.2.1. HR Policy............................................................................................................................................................. 134 4.2.2. KPIs and Information on their Achievement....................................................................................................... 143 4.3. SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DOI: 10.22378/2313-6197.2017-5-3 ISSN 2313-6197 (Online) ISSN 2308-152X (Print) ЗОЛОТООРДЫНСКОЕ ОБОЗРЕНИЕ 2017
    DOI: 10.22378/2313-6197.2017-5-3 ISSN 2313-6197 (Online) ISSN 2308-152X (Print) ЗОЛОТООРДЫНСКОЕ ОБОЗРЕНИЕ 2017. Том 5, № 3 ZOLOTOORDYNSKOE OBOZRENIE= G OLDEN H ORDE R EVIEW 2017. Vol. 5, no. 3 Научный журнал Academic Journal УЧРЕДИТЕЛЬ: FOUNDER: ГБУ «Институт истории State Institution им. Ш. Марджани Академии наук «Sh.Marjani Institute of History Республики Татарстан» of Tatarstan Academy of Sciences» Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ Certificate of registration in the mass media ПИ № ФС77–54682 от 9 июля 2013 г. ПИ № ФС77–54682 given by Roskomnadzor выдано Роскомнадзором on 9 July 2013 Журнал основан в апреле 2013 г. Journal was founded in April 2013 Выходит 4 раза в год Published 4 times a year РЕДАКЦИЯ: EDITORIAL OFFICE: 420014, г. Казань, Кремль, подъезд 5 (юрид.) 420014, Kazan, Kremlin, entrance 5 (juridical) 420111, г. Казань, ул. Батурина, 7 420111, Kazan, Baturin Str., 7 Тел./факс (843) 292 84 82 (приемная), Tel./Fax (843) 292 84 82 (reception), 292 00 19 292 00 19 Подписной индекс в каталоге Subscription index in the «Catalogue «Каталог Российской Прессы» – 31999 of the Russian Press» – 31999 ЖУРНАЛ ИНДЕКСИРУЕТСЯ В: THE JOURNAL IS INDEXED BY: Scopus Scopus Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory Российский индекс научного Russian Science Citation цитирования (РИНЦ), РГБ Index Database, RSL AcademicKeys, WorldCat AcademicKeys, WorldCat Научная электронная библиотека Scientific Electronic Open Access открытого доступа КиберЛенинка Library CyberLeninka Google Scholar, СОЦИОНЕТ Google Scholar, SOCIONET Журнал входит в Перечень российских рецензируемых научных журналов, в которых должны быть опубликованы основные научные результаты диссертаций на соискание ученых степеней доктора и кандидата наук (список научных журналов ВАК МОиН РФ) http://goldhorde.ru E-mail: [email protected] © ГБУ «Институт истории им.
    [Show full text]
  • Bayerische Repräsentanz in Der Russischen Föderation Gebiet Wladimir
    Bayerische Repräsentanz in der Russischen Föderation Gebiet Wladimir Stand 19.06.2017 Kennzahlen zum Gebiet Wladimir Bevölkerung 1,4 Mio. Einwohner Fläche 29,1 Tsd. km2 Bevölkerungsdichte 48 Einwohner / km2 Hauptstadt Wladimir – 354.800 Einwohner Weitere Städte Kowrow (139.300), Murom (110.100), Alexandrow (59.800) Bruttoregionalprodukt 358 Mrd. Rubel* / ≈ 5,3 Mrd. Euro BIP pro Kopf 256 Tsd. Rubel* / ≈ 3761 Euro Bruttoanlageinvestiti- 78,4 Mrd. Rubel / ≈ 1,2 Mrd. Euro onen Ausländische 17 Mio. Dollar* Direktinvestitionen Arbeitslosigkeit 6,3 % Wichtige Branchen 30 % Verarbeitendes Gewerbe (darunter inkl. 10,3% - Herstellung von Nahrungsmitteln und Ge- tränken, 3,5 – Chemie, 3,5% - Elektrotechnik, Elekt- ronik und Optik, 2,8% - Maschinenbau), 32 % Handel und Dienstleistungen, 8,1 % Verkehr und Kommunikation, 7,3 % Bauwirtschaft, 6,4% Landwirtschaft, 16,2 % Sonstige Branchen. Größte Degtyarev-Werk (Kowrow, Maschinenbau), Industrieunternehmen/ Mondelez Rus (Pokrow, Nahrungsmittelherstel- Steuerzahler lung), Ferrero Russia (Vorscha, Nahrungsmittelherstel- lung), Bayerische Repräsentanz in der Russischen Föderation Gusar (Gus-Khrustalny, Armaturenbau), Rudo (Lakinsk, Herstellung von Getränken), Beko (Kirzhatsch, Herstellung von Haushaltsgerä- ten), Kowrow Electromechanical Plant (Kowrow, Anla- genbau), Askona Vek (Kowrow, Herstellung von Matratzen), Generium (Volginskij, Herstellung von pharmazeu- tischen Grundstoffen), Dow Izolan (Wladimir, chemische Industrie), Rustechnologii (Kowrow, Herstellung von Metall- erzeugnissen),
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Museums Visit More Than 80 Million Visitors, 1/3 of Who Are Visitors Under 18
    Moscow 4 There are more than 3000 museums (and about 72 000 museum workers) in Russian Moscow region 92 Federation, not including school and company museums. Every year Russian museums visit more than 80 million visitors, 1/3 of who are visitors under 18 There are about 650 individual and institutional members in ICOM Russia. During two last St. Petersburg 117 years ICOM Russia membership was rapidly increasing more than 20% (or about 100 new members) a year Northwestern region 160 You will find the information aboutICOM Russia members in this book. All members (individual and institutional) are divided in two big groups – Museums which are institutional members of ICOM or are represented by individual members and Organizations. All the museums in this book are distributed by regional principle. Organizations are structured in profile groups Central region 192 Volga river region 224 Many thanks to all the museums who offered their help and assistance in the making of this collection South of Russia 258 Special thanks to Urals 270 Museum creation and consulting Culture heritage security in Russia with 3M(tm)Novec(tm)1230 Siberia and Far East 284 © ICOM Russia, 2012 Organizations 322 © K. Novokhatko, A. Gnedovsky, N. Kazantseva, O. Guzewska – compiling, translation, editing, 2012 [email protected] www.icom.org.ru © Leo Tolstoy museum-estate “Yasnaya Polyana”, design, 2012 Moscow MOSCOW A. N. SCRiAbiN MEMORiAl Capital of Russia. Major political, economic, cultural, scientific, religious, financial, educational, and transportation center of Russia and the continent MUSEUM Highlights: First reference to Moscow dates from 1147 when Moscow was already a pretty big town.
    [Show full text]
  • Asteraceae) of the Ryazan and Vladimir Regions of European Russia
    Skvortsovia: 2(2): 98 – 111 (2015) Skvortsovia ISSN 2309-6497 (Print) Copyright: © 2015 Russian Academy of Sciences http://skvortsovia.uran.ru/ ISSN 2309-6500 (Online) Article Additions and amendments in the genus Hieracium L. (Asteraceae) of the Ryazan and Vladimir Regions of European Russia Alexander N. Sennikov1,2* and Marina V. Kazakova3 1Botanical Museum, Finnish Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 7, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland 2Herbarium, Komarov Botanical Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Prof. Popov str. 2, St. Petersburg 197376, Russia 3Department of biology and methods of teaching, Ryazan State University, Svoboda str. 46, Ryazan 390000, Russia *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Received: 18 March 2015 | Accepted by D.J. Nicholas Hind: 27 May 2015 | Published on line: 2 June 2015 Abstract The collections of Hieracium from the Ryazan Region kept at MW and RSU were examined. The records of H. murorum s.l. or H. gentile from the Ryazan Region were found to belong to H. lepistoides (native), H. sylvularum (established alien, new to the Ryazan Region) and an unidentified species of Hieracium (alien). The records of H. vulgatum or H. jaccardii from the Ryazan Region belong to another unidentified alien species. Hieracium lepistoides is reported as new to the Vladimir Region, restricted to the Meshchera Lowlands. Hieracium robustum (new to the Ryazan Region) was found sympatric with H. virosum. Keywords: alien plants, apomictic species, Cichorieae, Compositae, distribution, established aliens, Lactuceae, new records, ornamental cultivation, park introduction Introduction The Ryazan and Vladimir Regions of European Russia occupy a special position in Central Russia because of the Meshchera Lowlands, an extensive territory that is delimited by the Oka and Klyazma Rivers and also continues to the Moscow Region.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 333 Humanities and Social Sciences: Novations, Problems, Prospects (HSSNPP 2019) Impact of Agricultural Climatic Potential on Development of Regional Grain Market Generalov I. Suslov S. Economics and automation of business processes Economics and automation of business processes Nizhny Novgorod State Engineering and Economic University Nizhny Novgorod State Engineering and Economic University Knyaginino, Russia Knyaginino, Russia [email protected] [email protected] Bazhenov R. Zavivaev S. Information systems, mathematics and legal informatics Technical and biological systems Sholom-Aleichem Priamursky State University Nizhny Novgorod State Engineering and Economic University Birobidzhan, Russia Knyaginino, Russia [email protected] [email protected] Dolmatova O. Land management Omsk State Agrarian University named after P.A. Stolypin Omsk, Russia [email protected] Abstract—The Nizhny Novgorod region is one of the leading turnover fall to the share of the Russian agrarian and industrial economically developed areas of the Russian Federation with high complex also confirms the need of its providing. potential for the development of agriculture. The purpose of the study is to assess the impact of agricultural climatic features on the In complex economic conditions of the Russian Federation, development of grain farming in the region. The article includes the control of various economic mechanisms moves to the the official data taken from the Nizhny Novgorod region forefront. The strategic need of development of competitive Territorial body of state statistics concerning indicators agriculture demands creation of the accurate system based on characterizing the amounts of grain sales. As a result, the main understanding of the needs of participants of the market and the features of grain sales are revealed within seven agricultural state.
    [Show full text]
  • Demographic, Economic, Geospatial Data for Municipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (Excluding the City of Moscow and the Moscow Oblast) in 2010-2016
    Population and Economics 3(4): 121–134 DOI 10.3897/popecon.3.e39152 DATA PAPER Demographic, economic, geospatial data for municipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010-2016 Irina E. Kalabikhina1, Denis N. Mokrensky2, Aleksandr N. Panin3 1 Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia 2 Independent researcher 3 Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia Received 10 December 2019 ♦ Accepted 28 December 2019 ♦ Published 30 December 2019 Citation: Kalabikhina IE, Mokrensky DN, Panin AN (2019) Demographic, economic, geospatial data for munic- ipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010- 2016. Population and Economics 3(4): 121–134. https://doi.org/10.3897/popecon.3.e39152 Keywords Data base, demographic, economic, geospatial data JEL Codes: J1, J3, R23, Y10, Y91 I. Brief description The database contains demographic, economic, geospatial data for 452 municipalities of the 16 administrative units of the Central Federal District (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) for 2010–2016 (Appendix, Table 1; Fig. 1). The sources of data are the municipal-level statistics of Rosstat, Google Maps data and calculated indicators. II. Data resources Data package title: Demographic, economic, geospatial data for municipalities of the Cen- tral Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010–2016. Copyright I.E. Kalabikhina, D.N.Mokrensky, A.N.Panin The article is publicly available and in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC-BY 4.0) can be used without limits, distributed and reproduced on any medium, pro- vided that the authors and the source are indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Urban Russian Funerals 109
    Contemporary Urban Russian Funerals 109 Contemporary Urban Russian Funerals: Continuity and Change Jeanmarie Rouhier-Willoughby University of Kentucky Про похороны интереснее рассказывать, потому что в похоронном обряде сохранились традиции глубже всего. Потому что тут, какими бы ни были люди далекими от всего, образованными, страшными консерваторами, тут надо все соблюсти. It is more interesting to talk about funerals because, in the funerary ritual, traditions have been preserved best of all. Because here, no matter how far people were from everything, whether educated, whether frightfully conservative, here everything has to be observed. So said Ekaterina Z., an informant from Novosibirsk, born in 1978. While Ekaterina’s opinion has some merit, as we will see, the urban Russian funeral has not been a stable ritual throughout the 20th and 21st centuries. In fact, it reflects attitudes from both the Soviet period and the post-Soviet period, attitudes which demonstrate how social values have changed over these periods. This paper is based on thirty interviews about funerals with residents of Novosibirsk and Vladimir, Russia (or with emigres to America). The informants ranged in age from 26 to 73 years of age and included 25 women and 5 men. 27 were Russian; the remaining three identified themselves as Tatar, Bashkir or Mordvin. They are representatives of the urban working and middle classes; most attended VUZy (institutions of higher education). 17 were from Novosibirsk and 13 from Vladimir. Most of the funerals they described took place in those locations between 1966 and 2003, although one funeral took place in Chita. In order to evaluate the validity of Ekaterina’s statement, we must first examine the traditional 19th century village funeral.
    [Show full text]
  • Atmospheric Impacts of the 2010 Russian Wildfires: Integrating
    Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 10031–10056, 2011 www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/10031/2011/ Atmospheric doi:10.5194/acp-11-10031-2011 Chemistry © Author(s) 2011. CC Attribution 3.0 License. and Physics Atmospheric impacts of the 2010 Russian wildfires: integrating modelling and measurements of an extreme air pollution episode in the Moscow region I. B. Konovalov1,2, M. Beekmann2, I. N. Kuznetsova3, A. Yurova3, and A. M. Zvyagintsev4 1Institute of Applied Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Nizhniy Novgorod, Russia 2Laboratoire Inter-Universitaire de Systemes` Atmospheriques,´ CNRS, UMR7583, Universite´ Paris-Est and Universite´ Paris 7, Creteil,´ France 3Hydrometeorological Centre of Russia, Moscow, Russia 4Central Aerological Laboratory, Dolgoprudny, Russia Received: 15 March 2011 – Published in Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.: 19 April 2011 Revised: 16 September 2011 – Accepted: 27 September 2011 – Published: 4 October 2011 Abstract. Numerous wildfires provoked by an unprece- uation. Indeed, ozone concentrations were simulated to be dented intensive heat wave caused continuous episodes of episodically very large (>400 µg m−3) even when fire emis- extreme air pollution in several Russian cities and densely sions were omitted in the model. It was found that fire emis- populated regions, including the Moscow region. This paper sions increased ozone production by providing precursors for analyzes the evolution of the surface concentrations of CO, ozone formation (mainly VOC), but also inhibited the pho- PM10 and ozone over the Moscow region during the 2010 tochemistry by absorbing and scattering solar radiation. In heat wave by integrating available ground based and satel- contrast, diagnostic model runs indicate that ozone concen- lite measurements with results of a mesoscale model.
    [Show full text]
  • Rank (Region And/Or Country) /1000 Participants Fall Spring Real (Norm) Dolgoprudny Moscow Reg
    THE INTERNATIONAL MATHEMATICAL TOURNAMENT OF TOWNS Location Population Number of NoP NoP NoP for calc. Town Diplomas Max Average Coeff. Rating Rank (region and/or country) /1000 participants Fall Spring real (norm) Dolgoprudny Moscow reg. 94 39 20 31 34 33 5 (5) 25,05 1,51 37,83 1 Nizhny Novgorod Sarov 94 21 11 14 9 33,75 5 (5) 21,28 1,51 32,14 2 reg. Troy Michigan (USA) 200 22 16 13 10 32,5 5 (5) 22,83 1,38 31,51 3 Kurgan Kurgan reg. 325 47 36 40 32 29,33 5 (5) 25,43 1,22 31,03 4 Yaroslavl Yaroslavl reg. 559 31 29 20 23 32 5 (5) 28,37 1 28,37 5 Novorossiysk Krasnodar terr. 262 14 6 12 13 26 5 (5) 20,67 1,3 26,87 6 Maykop Adygea 144 20 0 20 14 20 5 (5) 17,97 1,44 25,87 7 Kirov Kirov reg. 483 49 31 45 46 26 5 (5) 25,17 1,02 25,67 8 Naberezhnye Tatarstan 524 29 0 29 27 30 5 (5) 24,5 1 24,5 9 Chelny Jeju Rep. of Korea 435 14 12 6 13 26 5 (5) 22,62 1,08 24,43 10 Vologda Vologda reg. 306 26 20 16 12 21,33 5 (5) 19,4 1,24 24,06 11 Belgorod Belgorod reg. 384 19 18 7 6 25,33 5 (5) 20,87 1,15 24 12 Canberra Australia 356 30 13 23 15 26 5 (5) 20,03 1,18 23,64 13 Gwangmyeong Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University
    RUSSIAN GEOGRAPHICAL SOCIETY FACULTY OF GEOGRAPHY, LOMONOSOV MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHY, RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES No. 04 (v. 08) 2015 GEOGRAPHY ENVIRONMENT SUSTAINABILITY EDITORIAL BOARD EDITORSINCHIEF: Kasimov Nikolay S. Kotlyakov Vladimir M. Vandermotten Christian Lomonosov Moscow State Russian Academy of Sciences Université Libre de Bruxelles, University, Faculty of Geography, Institute of Geography, Belgium 04|2015 Russia Russia Tikunov Vladimir S. (Secretary-General) Kroonenberg Salomon Lomonosov Moscow State University, Delft University of Technology 2 GES Faculty of Geography, Russia Department of Applied Earth Sciences, Baklanov Alexander The Netherlands Danish Meteorological Institute, Kulmala Markku Denmark University of Helsinki, Division of Baklanov Petr Ya. Atmospheric Sciences, Finland Russian Academy of Sciences, Malkhazova Svetlana M. Pacific Institute of Geography, Russia Lomonosov Moscow State University, Chalkley Brian Faculty of Geography, Russia University of Plymouth, UK Meadows Michael E. Chubarova Natalya E. University of Cape Town, Department Lomonosov Moscow State University, of Environmental and Geographical Sciences Faculty of Geography, Russia South Africa De Maeyer Philippe Nefedova Tatyana G. Ghent University, Russian Academy of Sciences, Department of Geography, Belgium Institute of Geography, Russia Dobrolubov Sergey A. O’Loughlin John Lomonosov Moscow State University, University of Colorado at Boulder, Faculty of Geography, Russia Institute of Behavioral Sciences, USA Haigh Martin Pedroli Bas Oxford Brookes University, Wageningen University, Department of Social Sciences, UK The Netherlands Gulev Sergey K. Radovanovic Milan Russian Academy of Sciences, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Institute of Oceanology, Russia Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić”, Serbia Guo Huadong Sokratov Sergei A. Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Institute of Remote Sensing Faculty of Geography, Russia and Digital Earth, China Solomina Olga N.
    [Show full text]
  • Флуктуационная Изменчивость И Биомасса Листовых Пластин Древесных Растений Influence of Fluctuation Variability on Wood Plants 1Баранов С.Г., 2Усков М.В
    1 2 1. ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ИЗУЧЕНИИ БОТАНИКИ И МИКОЛОГИИ 575.174.015.3 ФЛУКТУАЦИОННАЯ ИЗМЕНЧИВОСТЬ И БИОМАССА ЛИСТОВЫХ ПЛАСТИН ДРЕВЕСНЫХ РАСТЕНИЙ INFLUENCE OF FLUCTUATION VARIABILITY ON WOOD PLANTS 1Баранов С.Г., 2Усков М.В. Владимирский государственный университет им. А.Г. и Н.Г. Столетовых Педагогический институт, кафедра биологического и географического образования, 1 – доцент кафедры БГО, 2 – старший преподаватель кафедры БГО Аннотация: Флуктуационная изменчивость, как вид фенотипической изменчивости, выражается в колебании фенотипических проявлений. Поведенная работа показывает, что колебания в ненаправленной (флуктуирующей) асимметрии листовых пластин древесных видов, как и их биомасса, связаны с климатическими факторами, с географическими особенностями популяций и различаются у разных древесных видов Ключевые слова: флуктуационная изменчивость, видовое различие, географическая изменчивость Abstract: Fluctuation variability, as a type of phenotypic variability is expressed in the fluctuation of phenotypic features. The study showed that fluctuations in the non-directional (fluctuating) asymmetry and biomass of leaf plates of woody species are associated with climatic factors and with geographical features of populations. Key words: fluctuation variability, species variety, geographical variability При изучении темы «Изменчивость» фенотипическая и генотипическая типы изменчивости часто противопоставляются, при этом теряется холистический смысл изменчивости, при которой играют роль как внутриядерные хромосомные и протеиновые
    [Show full text]
  • Mediaeval Rus’: People’S Destinies and Destinies of Manuscripts
    ISSN 2311-911X (print) ISSN 2313-6871 (online) Mediaeval Rus’: People’s Destinies and Destinies of Manuscripts Power in Russia and Issues of Communication The Duke of Richelieu in Russian Service V ol . 6 | 2018 | № 4 QR.URFU.RU Vol. 6 | 2018 | № 4 ISSN 2311-911X (print) ISSN 2313-6871 (online) QR.URFU.RU Vol. 6 | 2018 | № 4 QUAESTIO ROSSICA Vol. 6. 2018. № 4 http://qr.urfu.ru Журнал основан в 2013 г. Established in 2013 Выходит 4 раза в год (апрель, июнь, Published 4 times a year (April, June, сентябрь, декабрь) September, December) · · Учредитель – Уральский федераль- Founded by Ural Federal University ный университет имени первого named after the first President Президента России Б. Н. Ельцина of Russia B. N. Yeltsin (УрФУ) (UrFU) 620000, Россия, Екатеринбург, 51, Lenin Ave., 620000, Yekaterinburg, пр. Ленина, 51 Russia · · Свидетельство о регистрации Journal Registration Certificate ПИ № ФС77-56174 от 15.11.2013 PI № FS77-56174 as of 15.11.2013 · · «Quaestio Rossica» – рецензируемый научный “Quaestio Rossica” is a peer-reviewed журнал, сферой интересов которого явля- academic journal focusing on the study of ются исследования в области культуры, ис- Russia’s culture, art, history, archaeology, кусства, истории, археологии, лингвистики literature and linguistics. The journal aims и литературы России. Задача журнала – рас- to broaden the idea of Russian studies within ширить представления о российском гума- discourse in the humanities to encompass нитарном дискурсе в пространстве мировой an international community of scholars. науки. Приоритет отдается публикациям, Priority is given to articles that consider new в которых исследуются новые исторические historical and literary sources, that observe и литературные источники, выполняются rules of academic writing and objectivity, and требования академизма и научной объектив- that are characterized not only by their critical ности, историографической полноты и по- approach but also their historiographic лемической направленности.
    [Show full text]