DOCSLIB.ORG

Nuclear Security Culture: the Case of Russia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nuclear Security Culture: the Case of Russia NUCLEAR SECURITY CULTURE: THE CASE OF RUSSIA Center for International Trade and Security The University of Georgia NUCLEAR SECURITY CULTURE: THE CASE OF RUSSIA © Center for International Trade and Security University of Georgia December 2004 nuclear security culture: the case of russia ABOUT THE CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND SECURITY he Center for International Trade and Security (CITS) works to address the dangers posed by transfers of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and WMD-related technology and materials. CITS seeks to Taccomplish its mission by: • Engaging and informing policymakers, industry representatives, educators, and the public, both in the United States and abroad, about dangers stemming from the trade in and theft of weapons and weapons components. CITS communicates these concepts through policy research, public forums, editorials, briefings, Internet publications, and the publication of a journal, The Monitor: International Perspectives on Nonproliferation • Facilitating international dialogue through exchanges of officials and experts that will promote greater cooperation in preventing the spread of dangerous weapons and technology • Establishing training programs for government officials and others in “best practices” for controlling, monitoring, and preventing the trade in WMD and related items • Preparing future leaders for careers in international security and nonproliferation The CITS Security Policy Program is focused on: • Improving understanding and awareness of the importance of training and motivating personnel responsible for protecting nuclear and other WMD-related materials • Promoting U.S.-Russian dialogue on nonproliferation and threat reduction • Facilitating U.S. assistance to Russia and the other former Soviet states through analysis of their nuclear and military-industrial complexes • Analyzing and strengthening security at WMD-related facilities internationally Center for International Trade and Security 120 Holmes/Hunter Academic Building University of Georgia Athens, GA 30602 Dr. Gary K. Bertsch, Director Dr. Michael D. Beck, Executive Director (706) 542-2985 fax (706) 542-2975 [email protected] http://www.uga.edu/cits ii NUCLEAR SECURITY CULTURE: THE CASE OF RUSSIA EDITORS Igor Khripunov and James Holmes CO-AUTHORS Igor Khripunov Dmitriy Nikonov Maria Katsva This report has been supported in part with funds from the Nuclear Threat Initiative, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and the University of Georgia. Its contents represent the views, findings, and opinions of the authors, and are not necessarily those of the supporting organizations. iii nuclear security culture: the case of russia Acknowledgments This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their perspectives and technical expertise. Specifically, the authors and editors would like to express their gratitude to: Peer Reviewers: • Michael Beck (Center for International Trade and Security) • Allen Blancett (Independent expert, USA) • Matthew Bunn (Harvard University/Belfer Center) • Christopher Eldridge (U.S. National Academies) • Irina Kupriyanova (Institute of Physics and Power Engineering, Russia) • William Potter (Center for Nonproliferation Studies) • Yuri Volodin (Federal Service for Ecological, Technical, and Nuclear Oversight, Russia) Although the reviewers listed above provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the content of the report, nor did they see the final draft before its release. In addition, Charles Packer (Cherrystone Management Inc., Canada) and Paul Ebel (BE Inc., USA) contributed to Chapter I; Nikolay Ischenko, Rector, and Vladimir Kornelyuk, Head of Department at the Moscow Institute for Professional Training “Atomenergo,” participated in the development of Appendix II; and Jessica Howard (CITS) helped design and lay out the final publication. About the Project Team Igor Khripunov is the associate director of the Center for International Trade and Security and an adjunct professor at the University of Georgia School of Public and International Affairs. Dr. Khripunov served for six years as an international civil servant at the UN Secretariat in New York before joining the USSR Ministry of Foreign Affairs in 1977. In 1983, he received a Ph.D. in international relations from the Moscow-based Diplomatic Academy and resumed his diplomatic career as an arms control expert. He has served at the University of Georgia since 1992. James Holmes is a senior research associate at the Center. He edits the Center’s journal, The Monitor. A former U.S. Navy officer, Dr. Holmes served on board the battleship USS Wisconsin, taught engineering at the Surface Warfare Officers School Command, and served as professor of strategy at the U.S. Naval War College. He is a graduate of Vanderbilt University, Salve Regina University, the Naval War College, Providence College, and the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University. Dmitriy Nikonov is a senior research associate at the Center. He has been affiliated with the Center since 1995. Dr. Nikonov received a B.A. from the Pyatigorsk State Institute of Foreign Languages in Russia, an M.A. from Western Illinois University, and a Ph.D. from the University of Georgia. Maria Katsva is a research associate at the Center. Ms. Katsva graduated from Moscow State University and earned an M.P.A. from the University of Georgia. Before coming to UGA, she served as a research associate at the Moscow-based Center for Policy Studies in Russia. iv Contents About the Center for International Trade and Security. .ii Acknowledgements. iv About the Project Team . iv Table of Contents . v List of Abbreviations . vii Preface . viii Introduction . .1 Chapter I: SECURITY CULTURE: CONCEPT AND MODEL. .5 1.1 Background . .5 1.2 Safety and Security Overlap. .6 1.3 Nuclear Security . .7 1.4 Model of Nuclear Security Culture . .10 1.5 Model of Security Culture Mechanism . .13 Chapter II: HARDSHIPS OF ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL TRANSITION . .19 2.1 Weak Economy and Insufficient Funding . .19 2.2 Aging Infrastructure. .22 2.3 Federal System in Decay . .24 2.4 Antisocial Behaviors . .25 2.4.1 Corruption and Crime . .25 2.4.2 Drug Abuse and Alcoholism. .27 Chapter III: RUSSIAN LEADERS’ PERCEPTION OF SECURITY . .29 3.1 National Level. .30 3.1.1 The President . .31 3.1.2 Government/Cabinet . .33 3.1.3 Parliament . .35 3.2 Regional Level . .37 3.2.1 Regional Elites. .37 3.2.2 The General Public. .38 v nuclear security culture: the case of russia Chapter IV: NUCLEAR INDUSTRY FRAMEWORK . .41 4.1 Industry Leadership . .41 4.2 Facility Leadership . .45 4.2.1 Top Management . .45 4.2.2 Mid-level Management . .48 4.2.3 Rising Nuclear Managers . .49 Chapter V: PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE . .51 5.1 Professional and Work Culture . .52 5.1.1 Impact of History and Tradition . .52 5.1.2 Professional and Work Culture in Rosatom . .55 5.2 The Importance of Motivation . .56 5.3 Personal Responsibility . .58 5.3.1 Inadequate Job Description . .58 5.3.2 Whistle-blowing . .58 5.4 Education and Training. .59 5.5 Use of Guards . .60 Chapter VI: MPC&A LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK . .63 6.1 Current Legal Framework . .63 6.2 Legal and Regulatory Obstacles . .64 6.3 Russian Legal Culture . .66 Chapter VII: ENFORCEMENT AS DETERRENT. .69 7.1 Legal Provisions . .69 7.2 Investigation Procedures . .71 7.3 Vague Reporting Practice . .72 7.4 Poor Prosecution . .73 Chapter VIII: CONCLUSIONS . .75 Appendix I: Case Studies . .81 Case Study 1: Isotope Diversion at Elektrokhimpribor Facility . .81 Case Study 2: Corruption and Theft at Priokskiy Gold Refining Factory . .84 Appendix II: Learning and Professional Development: A Methodology for Security Culture in Russia . .87 Appendix III: Nuclear Security Culture Evaluation . .93 vi List of Abbreviations CIA Central Intelligence Agency (U.S.) CTR Cooperative Threat Reduction Program (Nunn-Lugar Program) DBT Design Basis Threat DOE Department of Energy (U.S.) FIS Federal Information System (Russia) FSB Federal Security Service (Russia) GAN (Gosatomnadzor) Federal Nuclear and Radiation Oversight Agency (Russia) GAO General Accounting Office (U.S.) IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency INFCIRC Information Circular (IAEA) IPPAS International Physical Protection Advisory Service (IAEA) KGB State Security Committee (USSR) LANL Los Alamos National Laboratory (U.S.) MC&A Material Control and Accounting Minatom Ministry of Atomic Energy (Russia) MOD Ministry of Defense (Russia) MPC&A Material Protection, Control, and Accounting MVD Interior Ministry (Russia) NKVD People’s Commissariat for Internal Affairs (USSR) NSC National Security Council (U.S.) PPS Physical Protection System Rosatom Federal Atomic Energy Agency (Russia) Rostekhnadzor Service for Environmental, Technological, and Nuclear Oversight (Russia) VA Vulnerability Analysis WMD Weapons of Mass Destruction vii nuclear security culture: the case of russia PREFACE his report on Nuclear Security Culture: The Case of Russia probes an obvious, yet often overlooked dimension of security: the human dimension. It examines security measures at facilities in Russia’s civilian nuclear sector and finds that, after over a decade of U.S. and European security Tassistance, security unfortunately remains porous. Why? In 1991 the U.S. government, under the visionary leadership of Sen. Sam Nunn (D-GA) and Sen. Dick Lugar (R-IN), created the Nunn- Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Program to help Russia safeguard its inventory of nuclear weapons, fissile materials, and the associated technology. The Nunn-Lugar
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Russia's Nuclear Security Policy
    Innovative approaches to peace and security from the Stanley Foundation POLICYANALYSISBRIEF THE STANLEY FOUNDATION | MAY 2015 Russia’s Nuclear Security Policy: Priorities and Potential Areas for Cooperation The crisis over Ukraine has led to a drastic reduction in regular official Russian-US contacts in most areas, including those where it is in the two countries’ mutual national security interests to work together. Bilateral cooperation on nuclear nonproliferation and nuclear security has been among the affected areas. The United States has suspended contacts with Russia in the framework of the G-8 and in the Russian-US Bilateral Presidential Commission’s Nuclear Energy and Nuclear Security Working Group. Implementation of the September 2013 agreement on Cooperation in Nuclear- and Energy- Related Scientific Research and Development (R&D Agreement), which Anton Khlopkov prioritizes joint efforts on nuclear nonproliferation and nuclear security, has also been put on hold, and exchanges between nuclear scientists of the two Author countries have been frozen. In turn, Russia has decided not to take part in Anton Khlopkov1 is director of the preparations for the 2016 Nuclear Security Summit. Moscow also notified Moscow-based Center for Energy and Washington that most of the joint nuclear security projects in Russia would Security Studies and editor in chief of the not be extended beyond December 31, 2014. journal Nuclear Club. He is a member of the Advisory Board under the Security This trend is a serious cause for concern, given that Russia and the United Council of the Russian Federation and States, which are depositaries of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of chairman of the Moscow Nonproliferation Nuclear Weapons (NPT), bear special responsibility for maintaining the Conference.
    [Show full text]
  • International Maritime Organization Maritime
    INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION MARITIME KNOWLEDGE CENTRE (MKC) “Sharing Maritime Knowledge” CURRENT AWARENESS BULLETIN DECEMBER 2019 www.imo.org Maritime Knowledge Centre (MKC) [email protected] www d Maritime Knowledge Centre (MKC) About the MKC Current Awareness Bulletin (CAB) The aim of the MKC Current Awareness Bulletin (CAB) is to provide a digest of news and publications focusing on key subjects and themes related to the work of IMO. Each CAB issue presents headlines from the previous month. For copyright reasons, the Current Awareness Bulletin (CAB) contains brief excerpts only. Links to the complete articles or abstracts on publishers' sites are included, although access may require payment or subscription. The MKC Current Awareness Bulletin is disseminated monthly and issues from the current and the past years are free to download from this page. Email us if you would like to receive email notification when the most recent Current Awareness Bulletin is available to be downloaded. The Current Awareness Bulletin (CAB) is published by the Maritime Knowledge Centre and is not an official IMO publication. Inclusion does not imply any endorsement by IMO. Table of Contents IMO NEWS & EVENTS ............................................................................................................................ 2 UNITED NATIONS ................................................................................................................................... 4 CASUALTIES...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Business in Russia EY Sadovnicheskaya Nab., 77, Bld
    Doing business in Russia EY Sadovnicheskaya nab., 77, bld. 1 115035, Moscow, Russia Paveletskaya Pl., 2, bld. 2 115054, Moscow, Russia Tel: +7 (495) 755 9700 Fax: +7 (495) 755 9701 2 Doing business in Russia Introduction This guide has been prepared by EY Russia to give the potential investor an insight into Russia and its economy and tax system, provide an overview of forms of business and accounting rules and answer questions that frequently arise for foreign businesses. Russia is a fast-developing country and is committed to improving the investment climate and developing a better legal environment for doing business. On the one hand, this makes doing business in Russia an attractive prospect; on the other, it can make for difficult decisions both when starting a business and further down the line. EY provides assurance, tax, legal, strategy, transactions and consulting services in 150 countries and employs over 300,000 professionals across the globe1, including more than 3,500 employees in 9 offices in Russia. EY possesses extensive, in-depth knowledge of Russian realities and is always ready to come to the assistance of first-time and experienced investors alike. This guide contains information current as at March 2021 (except where a later date is specified). You can find more information about doing business in Russia as well as up-to-date information on developments in its legal and tax environment on our website: www.ey.com/ru. 1 Who we are – Builders of a better working world | EY — Global Doing business in Russia 1 2 Doing business
    [Show full text]
  • Russia in Figures. 2017: Statistical Handbook/Rosstat - M., 2017 - 511 P
    FEDERAL STATE STATISTICS SERVICE (Rosstat) RUSSIA IN FIGURES 2017 STATISTICAL HANDBOOK Moscow 2017 UDK 31(470) Editorial Board: A. Surinov - Chairman of the Editorial Board E. Baranov, N. Bugakova, M. Gelvanovsky, L. Gokhberg, S. Egorenko, V. Elizarov, V. Zhitkov, Yu. Ivanov, A. Kevesh, A. Kosarev, K. Laikam, I. Masakova, V. Nesterov, G. Oksenoit, O. Rybak, B. Ryabushkin, A. Tatarinov, A. Khoroshilov Russia in Figures. 2017: Statistical Handbook/Rosstat - M., 2017 - 511 p. ISBN 978-5-89476-436-8 The handbook contains information on the social and eco- nomic situation of Russia in 2016 as compared with the previous years. It presents data characterizing the state structure of the Russian Federation, production and use of the Gross Domestic Product. Information is published on the population, its employ- ment and money incomes. The handbook highlights problems of social field, results of R&D work and innovation activities, fin- ances, investments, prices and tariffs. Some materials are dedi- cated to situation in organizations of different economic activi- ties. Reflected are the external economic activities of the Rus- sian Federation. Selected international comparisons are also given. The handbook is intended for managerial personnel, man- agers and employees of enterprises and organizations, scientif- ic, entrepreneurial and banking circles, professors and lecturers, under-graduate and post-graduate students of higher economic education institutions and other users. UDK 31(470) ISBN 978-5-89476-436-8 Federal State Statistics Service, 2017 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.gks.ru PREFACE The concise statistical handbook comprises main indicators cha- racterizing socio-economic situation of Russia in 2016 as compared with a number of previous years.
    [Show full text]
  • Nornickel and the Kola Peninsula
    THE BELLONA FOUNDATION Nornickel and the Kola Peninsula Photo: Thomas Nilsen ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE YEAR OF ECOLOGY JANUARY 2018 The Bellona Foundation is an international environmental NGO based in Norway. Founded in 1986 as a direct action protest group, Bellona has become a recognized technology and solution- oriented organizations with offices in Oslo, Brussels, Kiev, St. Petersburg and Murmansk. Altogether, some 60 engineers, ecologists, nuclear physicists, economists, lawyers, political scientists and journalists work at Bellona. Environmental change is an enormous challenge. It can only be solved if politicians and legislators develop clear policy frameworks and regulations for industry and consumers. Industry plays a role by developing and commercializing environmentally sound technology. Bellona strives to be a bridge builder between industry and policy makers, working closely with the former to help them respond to environmental challenges in their field, and proposing policy measures that promote new technologies with the least impact on the environment. Authors: Oskar Njaa © Bellona 201 8 Design: Bellona Disclaimer: Bellona endeavors to ensure that the information disclosed in this report is correct and free from copyrights, but does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, interpretation or usefulness of the information which may result from the use of this report. Contact: [email protected] Web page: www.bellona.org 1 Table of Contents 1 Introduction: ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Asteraceae) of the Ryazan and Vladimir Regions of European Russia
    Skvortsovia: 2(2): 98 – 111 (2015) Skvortsovia ISSN 2309-6497 (Print) Copyright: © 2015 Russian Academy of Sciences http://skvortsovia.uran.ru/ ISSN 2309-6500 (Online) Article Additions and amendments in the genus Hieracium L. (Asteraceae) of the Ryazan and Vladimir Regions of European Russia Alexander N. Sennikov1,2* and Marina V. Kazakova3 1Botanical Museum, Finnish Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 7, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland 2Herbarium, Komarov Botanical Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Prof. Popov str. 2, St. Petersburg 197376, Russia 3Department of biology and methods of teaching, Ryazan State University, Svoboda str. 46, Ryazan 390000, Russia *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Received: 18 March 2015 | Accepted by D.J. Nicholas Hind: 27 May 2015 | Published on line: 2 June 2015 Abstract The collections of Hieracium from the Ryazan Region kept at MW and RSU were examined. The records of H. murorum s.l. or H. gentile from the Ryazan Region were found to belong to H. lepistoides (native), H. sylvularum (established alien, new to the Ryazan Region) and an unidentified species of Hieracium (alien). The records of H. vulgatum or H. jaccardii from the Ryazan Region belong to another unidentified alien species. Hieracium lepistoides is reported as new to the Vladimir Region, restricted to the Meshchera Lowlands. Hieracium robustum (new to the Ryazan Region) was found sympatric with H. virosum. Keywords: alien plants, apomictic species, Cichorieae, Compositae, distribution, established aliens, Lactuceae, new records, ornamental cultivation, park introduction Introduction The Ryazan and Vladimir Regions of European Russia occupy a special position in Central Russia because of the Meshchera Lowlands, an extensive territory that is delimited by the Oka and Klyazma Rivers and also continues to the Moscow Region.
    [Show full text]
  • Demographic, Economic, Geospatial Data for Municipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (Excluding the City of Moscow and the Moscow Oblast) in 2010-2016
    Population and Economics 3(4): 121–134 DOI 10.3897/popecon.3.e39152 DATA PAPER Demographic, economic, geospatial data for municipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010-2016 Irina E. Kalabikhina1, Denis N. Mokrensky2, Aleksandr N. Panin3 1 Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia 2 Independent researcher 3 Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia Received 10 December 2019 ♦ Accepted 28 December 2019 ♦ Published 30 December 2019 Citation: Kalabikhina IE, Mokrensky DN, Panin AN (2019) Demographic, economic, geospatial data for munic- ipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010- 2016. Population and Economics 3(4): 121–134. https://doi.org/10.3897/popecon.3.e39152 Keywords Data base, demographic, economic, geospatial data JEL Codes: J1, J3, R23, Y10, Y91 I. Brief description The database contains demographic, economic, geospatial data for 452 municipalities of the 16 administrative units of the Central Federal District (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) for 2010–2016 (Appendix, Table 1; Fig. 1). The sources of data are the municipal-level statistics of Rosstat, Google Maps data and calculated indicators. II. Data resources Data package title: Demographic, economic, geospatial data for municipalities of the Cen- tral Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010–2016. Copyright I.E. Kalabikhina, D.N.Mokrensky, A.N.Panin The article is publicly available and in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC-BY 4.0) can be used without limits, distributed and reproduced on any medium, pro- vided that the authors and the source are indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Norwegian Environmentalism Between State and Local Community: Why Greenpeace Failed in Norway
    NORWEGIAN ENVIRONMENTALISM BETWEEN STATE AND LOCAL COMMUNITY: WHY GREENPEACE FAILED IN NORWAY Kristin Strømsnes, Per Selle and Gunnar Grendstad Stein Rokkan Centre for Social Studies / Department of Comparative Politics, University of Bergen Paper presented at the 7th International ISTR Conference, Bangkok, Thailand, July 9-12 2006. NORWEGIAN ENVIRONMENTALISM BETWEEN STATE AND LOCAL COMMUNITY: WHY GREENPEACE FAILED IN NORWAY Kristin Strømsnes, Per Selle and Gunnar Grendstad Why is it that Greenpeace never succeeded in Norway? To answer this question, we have to examine the way organized environmentalism is configured in the Norwegian case. This is a case that does not easily fit into the general assumptions behind the definitions of environmentalism that has been generated by the bulk of ‘continental’ or ‘Anglo-Saxon’ literature (see Grendstad et al. 2006). We argue that the Norwegian case deviates from the mainstream definition of environmentalism due to two anomalies. The roots of the two anomalies are found at different but interrelated levels of analysis. The first anomaly is that the Norwegian political and social system differs when compared to systems in most other countries in that adversary actors or interests are not excluded from national politics, but, in general, are welcomed by the government. We label this anomaly the inclusive polity and the state-friendly society. In short, we refer to it as the state-friendly society. This anomaly, which has a long historical tradition, is primarily found at a structural level. But it also ties in with mainstream attitudes and beliefs that define part of the Norwegian political culture. The other anomaly is more ideological, although this, too, has strong structural ties because national environmental concern is influenced by a notion of social hardship and self-sufficiency as part of local living.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance on Russia's Early-Modern Frontier
    ABSOLUTISM AND EMPIRE: GOVERNANCE ON RUSSIA’S EARLY-MODERN FRONTIER DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Matthew Paul Romaniello, B. A., M. A. The Ohio State University 2003 Examination Committee: Approved by Dr. Eve Levin, Advisor Dr. Geoffrey Parker Advisor Dr. David Hoffmann Department of History Dr. Nicholas Breyfogle ABSTRACT The conquest of the Khanate of Kazan’ was a pivotal event in the development of Muscovy. Moscow gained possession over a previously independent political entity with a multiethnic and multiconfessional populace. The Muscovite political system adapted to the unique circumstances of its expanding frontier and prepared for the continuing expansion to its east through Siberia and to the south down to the Caspian port city of Astrakhan. Muscovy’s government attempted to incorporate quickly its new land and peoples within the preexisting structures of the state. Though Muscovy had been multiethnic from its origins, the Middle Volga Region introduced a sizeable Muslim population for the first time, an event of great import following the Muslim conquest of Constantinople in the previous century. Kazan’s social composition paralleled Moscow’s; the city and its environs contained elites, peasants, and slaves. While the Muslim elite quickly converted to Russian Orthodoxy to preserve their social status, much of the local population did not, leaving Moscow’s frontier populated with animists and Muslims, who had stronger cultural connections to their nomadic neighbors than their Orthodox rulers. The state had two major goals for the Middle Volga Region.
    [Show full text]
  • IRON and STEEL Takes Part in the Chemical Reaction to Produce Steel
    AN Iyourndustry’s Guide phoneto pillsClimate Actioncar houseindirectly emit CO2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Grateful thanks to the Children’s Investment Fund Foundation for supporting our work on indutrial climate action. DISCLAIMER Bellona endeavours to ensure that the information disclosed in this report is correct and free from copyrights but does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, interpretation or usefulness of the information which may result from the use of this report. © 2018 by the Bellona Foundation. All rights reserved. This copy is for personal, non-commercial useonly. Users may download, print or copy extracts of content from this publication for their own and non-commercial use. No part of this work may be reproduced without quoting the Bellona Foundation or the source used in this report. Commercial use of this publication requires prior consent of the Bellona Foundation. ABOUT BELLONA Bellona Europa is the Brussels-based branch of the Norwegian Bellona Foundation, an independent non-profit organisation working on the environmental, climate and social issues of our time. We aim to identify, promote and help implement realisable solutions for the protection of nature, the environment and health. To achieve these goals, Bellona continues to work with – and against – relevant actors and stakeholders both nationally, and internationally. OUR ORGANISATION Bellona was founded in 1986 in Oslo, Norway, as an environmental action group. Still headquartered in Oslo, we have since expanded with offices in Brussels, Murmansk and St. Petersburg. Our team consists of about 65 employees with diverse professional backgrounds in communication, engineering, ecology, economics, geosciences, law, physics, and political and social sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Arm's Way: a Look Into the Culture of the Defense and Security Industry
    ISSN 1653-2244 INSTITUTIONEN FÖR KULTURANTROPOLOGI OCH ETNOLOGI DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY AND ETHNOLOGY In (H)Arm’s way: A look into the Culture of the defense and security industry By Stephenie G. Tesoro Supervisor: Susann Baez Ullberg 2019 MASTERUPPSATSER I KULTURANTROPOLOGI Nr 96 Table of Contents Notes on the Text ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Theoretical Framework and Research To-Date .................................................................................... 5 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................ 9 Polymorphous Engagement ................................................................................................................................. 9 Trade Shows: How Empty Halls Fuel Industries .......................................................................................... 10 Struggles in the Field .......................................................................................................................................... 12 The Context of the Global Arms Industry in the Twenty-First Century ...................................... 14 The Language of the Defense & Security Industry .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Preliminary Draft Do Not Cite Transparency and The
    PRELIMINARY DRAFT DO NOT CITE TRANSPARENCY AND THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Misha Singh and Shekhar Singh1 Introduction It has been a little over fifty years since environmental degradation was acknowledged to have joined the ranks of hunger, poverty, disease, war and injustice as one of the main threats confronting humanity. Since then, the news has been mostly bad and not only has the threat become more severe but new dimensions, like global warming, depletion of the ozone layer, space litter, electronic waste, and genetically modified organisms, have become evident. Environmental degradation has also come to be recognised, along with injustice, as an underlying cause behind much of the hunger, poverty and disease, and some of the wars, that afflict the world. This paper attempts to describe the growth of environmental consciousness and its relation with transparency. It describes the current state of legal instrumentalities and traces the evolution of access to environmental information movements and laws and their relationship with more general transparency laws and struggles. It finally lists out some of the environmental areas and issues where access to information is especially critical. The Growth of Global Environmental Consciousness The last hundred and fifty years saw unprecedented growth in human population, rapid changes in human lifestyles and consumption patterns, and growth of technologies that facilitated unlimited exploitation of natural resources. As more and more people needed and wanted more and more goods and resources, and acquired the capacity to extract these from nature, the natural environment began to degrade. Unfortunately, the process of extraction of natural resources and their conversion into goods for human use also produced by-products that polluted the environment.
    [Show full text]