DOCSLIB.ORG

PDABL417.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PDABL417.Pdf 1 INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORPORATION FINAL FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL REPORT USAID Grant CCS-0005-G-00-2023-00 Small-Scale Privatization June 1995 I SUMMARY OF CONTENTS This document contains final financial report as well as summary descriptions of the International Finance Corporation's privatization-related activities in the former Soviet Union funded under USAID Grant #CCS-0005-G-00-2023-00 (funding period 5/26/92- 2/28/95). Under this grant, IFC completed or initiated the following projects: Equipment Purchase for GKI in Russia (completed); Small-Scale Privatization in Russia (completed); Trucking Transport Privatization in Russia (completed); Land Privatization in Russia (ongoing with British financing); Small-Scale Privatization in Ukraine (ongoing with new USAE) financing); Small-Scale Privatization in Belarus (ongoing with new USAE) financing). For each project, the summary descriptions cover IFC's design and implementation of the pilot phase; pilot results; expansion; and total results to date. FINAL FINANCIAL REPORT International Finance Corporation June 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS Statement of Cash Receipts, Disbursements and Grant Balance .................. 3 Financial Report .............................................. 4 Equipment Inventory .......................................... 19 .y International Finance Corporation USAID Grant #CCS-0005-G-00-2023-00 Small-Scale Privatization Grant Period May 26, 1992 - February 28, 1995 Statement of Cash Receipts, Disbursements and Grant Balance (Expressed in US dollars) Receipts Contributions 1,150,000.00 1,600,000.00 1,000,000.00 900,000.00 3,000,000.00 1,900,000.00 Interest income 209,528.22 Total receipts 9,759,528.22 Disbursements Project disbursements 9,531,354.78 Excess of receipts 228,173.44 Grant balance consists of: Cash 18,645.22 Interest 209,528.22 Total balance FINANCIAL REPORT Total amount: US$9,550,000 Starting date: 05.26.92 Expiration date: 02.28.95 The grant was disbursed to IFC in six sums: US$1,150,000 (request of 08.31.92) US$1,600,000 (request of 10.05.92) US$1,000,000 (request of 11.12.92) US$ 900,000 (request of 01.26.93) US$3,000,000 (request of 08.25.93) US$1,900,000 (request of 01.14.94) The final breakdown of costs by projects is the following: Project FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 TOTAL Russia GKI 78,170.50 431,877.29 510,047.79 Equipment Russia Small- 1,738,991.29 282.984.32 2,021,975.61 Scale Russia 726,480.67 113,555.02 840,035.69 Trucking Transport Russia 430,728.57 1,318,581.35 73,662.63 1,822.972.55 Land Russia 96,854.53 786,777.16 883,631.69 Moscow Central Washington 38,990.95 66,449.06 10,428.25 115,868.26 Central Ukraine 625,473.09 1,398,966.95 582,859.57 2,607,299.61 Small-Scale Belarus 13,500 536,744.27 149,244.71 699,488.98 Small-Scale Consultant 6,107.55 19,943.35 3,983.70 30,034.60 Insurance TOTAL 78,170.50 4,109,003.94 4,524,001.48 820,178.86 9,531,354.78 The breakdown of costs inside each project is the following: RUSSIA: GKI FY 92-93 Expense category Expended Staff travel 44,915.79 Contractual services 21,950.10 GKI equipment FY92 78,170.50 GKI equipment FY93 365,011.40 Total 510,047.79 RUSSIA: SMALL-SCALE PRIVATIZATION FY 93-94 Expense category Expended Consultant salary 301,077.88 Consultant relocation, monthly allowance 92,000 Consultant travel (includes local staff 292,583.72 salaries, office supplies, office equipment, office rent) Staff travel 77,772.43 Consulting companies 17,150 (Advanced Information Services) Consulting companies 33,613.70 (Doradca) Consulting companies 176,001.53 (Young & Rubicam) Consulting companies 385,629.00 (Bain & Link) Legal 76,598.85 (White & Case) Manual 546,685.46 Equipment through Washington 22,863.04 Total 2,021,975.61 RUSSIA: TRANSPORT PRIVATIZATION FY93-94 Expense category Expended Consultant salary (and leave) 213,823.20 Consultant relocation, monthly allowance 35,500 Consultant travel (includes 172,061.79 local staff salaries, office supplies, office equipment, office rent) Staff travel 82,992 Consulting companies 150,155.31 (Young & Rubicam) Legal 67,096.16 (White & Case) Equipment through Washington 4,691.20 Manual 113,716.03 Total 840,035.69 RUSSIA: LAND FY93-95 Expense category Expended Consultant salary 308,649.88 Consultant relocation, monthly allowance 106,500 Consultant travel (includes local staff 132,648.07 salaries, office supplies, office equipment, office rent) Staff travel (in some cases includes local 272,285.52 staff salaries, office supplies, office - equipment, office rent) Consulting companies 45,046.34 (Chemonics) Consulting companies 205,219.53 (Burson Marstellar) Consulting companies 267,254.27 (Agland) Consulting companies 45,671.00 (Young & Rubicam) Agrarian Institute 9,790 Legal (Chadbourne & Parks) 359,634.82 Legal (White & case) 22,009.34 Contractual services 2,757.35 Farmers' trip 42,153.38 Equipment through Washington 3,353.05 Total 1,822,972.55 UKRAINE: SMALL-SCALE FY93-95 Expense category Expended Consultant salary (and leave pay) 573,351.29 Consultant relocation and monthly 100,000 allowance Consultant travel (includes local staff 1,304,080.44 salaries, office supplies, office equipment, office rent) Staff travel 17,298.24 Consulting companies 24,800 (PERU) Consulting companies 30,957.25 (Advanced Information Services) Consulting companies 114,563.60 (Warsaw Consulting) Legal (Baker & McKenzie) 238,317.94 Legal (Goussev) 2,400 Manual 162,790.85 Satellite phone 38,740 Total 2,607,299.61 BELARUS: SMALL-SCALE FY94-95 Expense category Expended Consultant salary 142,083.38 Consultant relocation, monthly allowance 28,000 Consultant travel (includes local staff 225,782.69 salaries, office supplies, office equipment, office rent) Staff travel 16,735.70 Consulting companies (Doradca) 214,839.35 Legal (Baker & McKenzie) 24,784.35 Manual 47,263.51 Total 699,488.98 10 RUSSIA: MOSCOW CENTRAL FY 93-94 Expense category Expended Consultant salary 47,132.04 Consultant relocation 20,625 Consultant travel 9,278.19 Local operating costs (local staff salaries, 806,596.46 office rent, office supplies, office equipment, local travel) Total 883,631.69 11 WASHINGTON CENTRAL FV 93-95 Expense category Expended Consultant salary 88,087.68 Staff travel 24,231.83 Price Waterhouse audit (arranged by World 3,548.75 Bank Trust Fund Unit) Total 115,868.26 12 4. Here follows a brief explanation of the expense categories. a. Consultant salaries include salaries of 45 consultants (both long- and short-term, all US nationals) having worked on the projects hi the course of three years. b. Relocation, housing and transport allowances were paid to long-term consultants living in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus. The allowances were calculated taking COLA adjustments and security issues into consideration. c. Consultant travel includes long- and short-term consultant travel expenses as well as local operating costs such as translation services, local staff salaries, business communications, purchase of computer equipment (see attached Equipment Inventory), apartment rental, local staff travel. These costs were accumulated hi the consultant travel category because of internal IFC accounting system constraints concerning cash transactions in Russia. d. Staff travel includes the travel expenses of IFC Europe Department staff who worked on the project - Anthony Doran, Gretchen Wilson, Roberta Feldman, as well as trips and travel expenses of other IFC staff members from the legal, corporate relations and engineering departments assisting hi die implementation of the projects. Travel expenses of staff members include local operating costs such as translation services, local staff salaries, business communications, local staff travel and salaries. These costs were accumulated in the staff travel category because of internal IFC accounting system constraints concerning cash transactions in Russia. e. Consulting companies contracted to work on the projects are the following: Company Area Advanced Information Services privatization Doradca privatization Young & Rubicam public relations Bain Link privatization White & Case legal Chemonics agricultural privatization Burson Marstellar public relations Agland agriculture Chadboume & Parke legal PERU privatization Warsaw Consulting privatization Baker & McKenzie legal 13 r f. Moscow central office was set up in the course of implementation of projects. Expenses incurred include local staff travel, local legal companies, local travel, equipment and other operating expenses. g. Washington coordination aspect includes consultants working on the project in Washington (as of now i Russian, 2 US national). It also includes equipment bought through Washington and sent to the field and transferred, together with the equipment bought locally, to local authorities when the work was finished (see attached Equipment Inventory). h. Consultants' Insurance consists of the health insurance contributions for long-term consultants. 5. The staff members directly involved in the projects made a contribution of 391 staff- weeks which is the equivalent to $3,881,000. Project Name Days Contribution Russia: OKI Equipment Shapiro 34 68,000 McFayden 20 40,000 Aston 13 26,000 Nicholson 10 20,000 Russia: Small-Scale Jones 32 64,000 Jungreis 5 10,000 Segal 8 16,000 Doran 230 460,000 Feldman 6 12,000 Russia: Trucking Jones 7 14,000 Kasrai 10 20,000 Bakaleinik 32 64,000 Wilson 607 1,214,000 Doran 118 236,000 Russia: Land Wilson 70 140,000 Doran 220 440,000 14 / Hechl 45 90,000 Segal 6 12,000 Cobban 4 8,000 Ukraine: Small-Scale Feldman 260 520,000 Jungreis 7 14,000 Belarus: Small-Scale Feldman 164 328,000 Washington Central Garama 21 21,000 Tetley 22 44,000 TOTAL 1,951 3,881,000 In addition to the above, there were other IFC staff members taking part in the development of the program in the course of meetings, consultations and discussions.
Load more
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

264 pages remaining, click to load more.

Recommended publications
  • Bayerische Repräsentanz in Der Russischen Föderation Gebiet Wladimir
    Bayerische Repräsentanz in der Russischen Föderation Gebiet Wladimir Stand 19.06.2017 Kennzahlen zum Gebiet Wladimir Bevölkerung 1,4 Mio. Einwohner Fläche 29,1 Tsd. km2 Bevölkerungsdichte 48 Einwohner / km2 Hauptstadt Wladimir – 354.800 Einwohner Weitere Städte Kowrow (139.300), Murom (110.100), Alexandrow (59.800) Bruttoregionalprodukt 358 Mrd. Rubel* / ≈ 5,3 Mrd. Euro BIP pro Kopf 256 Tsd. Rubel* / ≈ 3761 Euro Bruttoanlageinvestiti- 78,4 Mrd. Rubel / ≈ 1,2 Mrd. Euro onen Ausländische 17 Mio. Dollar* Direktinvestitionen Arbeitslosigkeit 6,3 % Wichtige Branchen 30 % Verarbeitendes Gewerbe (darunter inkl. 10,3% - Herstellung von Nahrungsmitteln und Ge- tränken, 3,5 – Chemie, 3,5% - Elektrotechnik, Elekt- ronik und Optik, 2,8% - Maschinenbau), 32 % Handel und Dienstleistungen, 8,1 % Verkehr und Kommunikation, 7,3 % Bauwirtschaft, 6,4% Landwirtschaft, 16,2 % Sonstige Branchen. Größte Degtyarev-Werk (Kowrow, Maschinenbau), Industrieunternehmen/ Mondelez Rus (Pokrow, Nahrungsmittelherstel- Steuerzahler lung), Ferrero Russia (Vorscha, Nahrungsmittelherstel- lung), Bayerische Repräsentanz in der Russischen Föderation Gusar (Gus-Khrustalny, Armaturenbau), Rudo (Lakinsk, Herstellung von Getränken), Beko (Kirzhatsch, Herstellung von Haushaltsgerä- ten), Kowrow Electromechanical Plant (Kowrow, Anla- genbau), Askona Vek (Kowrow, Herstellung von Matratzen), Generium (Volginskij, Herstellung von pharmazeu- tischen Grundstoffen), Dow Izolan (Wladimir, chemische Industrie), Rustechnologii (Kowrow, Herstellung von Metall- erzeugnissen),
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Museums Visit More Than 80 Million Visitors, 1/3 of Who Are Visitors Under 18
    Moscow 4 There are more than 3000 museums (and about 72 000 museum workers) in Russian Moscow region 92 Federation, not including school and company museums. Every year Russian museums visit more than 80 million visitors, 1/3 of who are visitors under 18 There are about 650 individual and institutional members in ICOM Russia. During two last St. Petersburg 117 years ICOM Russia membership was rapidly increasing more than 20% (or about 100 new members) a year Northwestern region 160 You will find the information aboutICOM Russia members in this book. All members (individual and institutional) are divided in two big groups – Museums which are institutional members of ICOM or are represented by individual members and Organizations. All the museums in this book are distributed by regional principle. Organizations are structured in profile groups Central region 192 Volga river region 224 Many thanks to all the museums who offered their help and assistance in the making of this collection South of Russia 258 Special thanks to Urals 270 Museum creation and consulting Culture heritage security in Russia with 3M(tm)Novec(tm)1230 Siberia and Far East 284 © ICOM Russia, 2012 Organizations 322 © K. Novokhatko, A. Gnedovsky, N. Kazantseva, O. Guzewska – compiling, translation, editing, 2012 icom.russia@gmail.com www.icom.org.ru © Leo Tolstoy museum-estate “Yasnaya Polyana”, design, 2012 Moscow MOSCOW A. N. SCRiAbiN MEMORiAl Capital of Russia. Major political, economic, cultural, scientific, religious, financial, educational, and transportation center of Russia and the continent MUSEUM Highlights: First reference to Moscow dates from 1147 when Moscow was already a pretty big town.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 333 Humanities and Social Sciences: Novations, Problems, Prospects (HSSNPP 2019) Impact of Agricultural Climatic Potential on Development of Regional Grain Market Generalov I. Suslov S. Economics and automation of business processes Economics and automation of business processes Nizhny Novgorod State Engineering and Economic University Nizhny Novgorod State Engineering and Economic University Knyaginino, Russia Knyaginino, Russia ivan.generalov.91@bk.ru nccmail4@mail.ru Bazhenov R. Zavivaev S. Information systems, mathematics and legal informatics Technical and biological systems Sholom-Aleichem Priamursky State University Nizhny Novgorod State Engineering and Economic University Birobidzhan, Russia Knyaginino, Russia r-i-bazhenov@yandex.ru szavivaiev@bk.ru Dolmatova O. Land management Omsk State Agrarian University named after P.A. Stolypin Omsk, Russia on.dolmatova@omgau.org Abstract—The Nizhny Novgorod region is one of the leading turnover fall to the share of the Russian agrarian and industrial economically developed areas of the Russian Federation with high complex also confirms the need of its providing. potential for the development of agriculture. The purpose of the study is to assess the impact of agricultural climatic features on the In complex economic conditions of the Russian Federation, development of grain farming in the region. The article includes the control of various economic mechanisms moves to the the official data taken from the Nizhny Novgorod region forefront. The strategic need of development of competitive Territorial body of state statistics concerning indicators agriculture demands creation of the accurate system based on characterizing the amounts of grain sales. As a result, the main understanding of the needs of participants of the market and the features of grain sales are revealed within seven agricultural state.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Framework of Russia. the 250 Largest Industrial Centers Of
    INDUSTRIAL FRAMEWORK OF RUSSIA 250 LARGEST INDUSTRIAL CENTERS OF RUSSIA Metodology of the Ranking. Data collection INDUSTRIAL FRAMEWORK OF RUSSIA The ranking is based on the municipal statistics published by the Federal State Statistics Service on the official website1. Basic indicator is Shipment of The 250 Largest Industrial Centers of own production goods, works performed and services rendered related to mining and manufacturing in 2010. The revenue in electricity, gas and water Russia production and supply was taken into account only regarding major power plants which belong to major generation companies of the wholesale electricity market. Therefore, the financial results of urban utilities and other About the Ranking public services are not taken into account in the industrial ranking. The aim of the ranking is to observe the most significant industrial centers in Spatial analysis regarding the allocation of business (productive) assets of the Russia which play the major role in the national economy and create the leading Russian and multinational companies2 was performed. Integrated basis for national welfare. Spatial allocation, sectorial and corporate rankings and company reports was analyzed. That is why with the help of the structure of the 250 Largest Industrial Centers determine “growing points” ranking one could follow relationship between welfare of a city and activities and “depression areas” on the map of Russia. The ranking allows evaluation of large enterprises. Regarding financial results of basic enterprises some of the role of primary production sector at the local level, comparison of the statistical data was adjusted, for example in case an enterprise is related to a importance of large enterprises and medium business in the structure of city but it is located outside of the city border.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Urban Russian Funerals 109
    Contemporary Urban Russian Funerals 109 Contemporary Urban Russian Funerals: Continuity and Change Jeanmarie Rouhier-Willoughby University of Kentucky Про похороны интереснее рассказывать, потому что в похоронном обряде сохранились традиции глубже всего. Потому что тут, какими бы ни были люди далекими от всего, образованными, страшными консерваторами, тут надо все соблюсти. It is more interesting to talk about funerals because, in the funerary ritual, traditions have been preserved best of all. Because here, no matter how far people were from everything, whether educated, whether frightfully conservative, here everything has to be observed. So said Ekaterina Z., an informant from Novosibirsk, born in 1978. While Ekaterina’s opinion has some merit, as we will see, the urban Russian funeral has not been a stable ritual throughout the 20th and 21st centuries. In fact, it reflects attitudes from both the Soviet period and the post-Soviet period, attitudes which demonstrate how social values have changed over these periods. This paper is based on thirty interviews about funerals with residents of Novosibirsk and Vladimir, Russia (or with emigres to America). The informants ranged in age from 26 to 73 years of age and included 25 women and 5 men. 27 were Russian; the remaining three identified themselves as Tatar, Bashkir or Mordvin. They are representatives of the urban working and middle classes; most attended VUZy (institutions of higher education). 17 were from Novosibirsk and 13 from Vladimir. Most of the funerals they described took place in those locations between 1966 and 2003, although one funeral took place in Chita. In order to evaluate the validity of Ekaterina’s statement, we must first examine the traditional 19th century village funeral.
    [Show full text]
  • International Organizations and Globalizations of Russian Regions
    International Organizations and Globalization of Russian Regions Introduction Why is it so important to raise the issue of globalization for Russia and her regions? Despite the underdevelopment of Russia’s version of globalization, the international community in general and specific foreign countries in particular do have their impact on internal developments in Russia. Sometimes the effects of globalization are not visible enough, but they cannot be disregarded. In spite of his inward-oriented rhetoric, President Putin’s federal reform launched in May 2000 to some extent was inspired by developments outside Russia. These were the foreign investors who were confused by the tug-of-war between the federal center and the regions, and who called for a reshuffle of the federal system in Russia to avoid conflicts between federal and regional laws and get rid of regional autarchy. What is also telling is that Putin intends to implement his federal reform in accordance with formal democratic procedures, keeping in mind Western sensitivity to these issues. The shift of power from the center to the regional actors was the major development in Russian politics in the beginning of the 1990s. Yet the Russian regions are not equal players on the international scene. Not all of them are capable of playing meaningful roles internationally, and these roles can be quite different for each one. Three groups of constituent parts of the Federation ought to be considered as the most important Russian sub-national actors in the international arena. The first group comprises those regions with a strong export potential (industrial regions or those rich in mineral resources[1]).
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Art, Icons + Antiques
    RUSSIAN ART, ICONS + ANTIQUES International auction 872 1401 - 1580 RUSSIAN ART, ICONS + ANTIQUES Including The Commercial Attaché Richard Zeiner-Henriksen Russian Collection International auction 872 AUCTION Friday 9 June 2017, 2 pm PREVIEW Wednesday 24 May 3 pm - 6 pm Thursday 25 May Public Holiday Friday 26 May 11 am - 5 pm Saturday 27 May 11 am - 4 pm Sunday 28 May 11 am - 4 pm Monday 29 May 11 am - 5 pm or by appointment Bredgade 33 · DK-1260 Copenhagen K · Tel +45 8818 1111 · Fax +45 8818 1112 info@bruun-rasmussen.dk · bruun-rasmussen.com 872_russisk_s001-188.indd 1 28/04/17 16.28 Коллекция коммерческого атташе Ричарда Зейнера-Хенриксена и другие русские шедевры В течение 19 века Россия переживала стремительную трансформацию - бушевала индустриализация, модернизировалось сельское хозяйство, расширялась инфраструктура и создавалась обширная телеграфная система. Это представило новые возможности для международных деловых отношений, и известные компании, такие как датская Бурмэйстер энд Вэйн (В&W), Восточно-Азиатская Компания (EAC) и Компания Грэйт Норсерн Телеграф (GNT) открыли офисы в России и внесли свой вклад в развитие страны. Большое количество скандинавов выехало на Восток в поисках своей удачи в растущей деловой жизни и промышленности России. Среди многочисленных путешественников возникало сильное увлечение культурой страны, что привело к созданию высококачественных коллекций русского искусства. Именно по этой причине сегодня в Скандинавии так много предметов русского антиквариата, некоторые из которых будут выставлены на этом аукционе. Самые значимые из них будут ещё до аукциона выставлены в посольстве Дании в Лондоне во время «Недели Русского Искусства». Для более подробной информации смотри страницу 9. Изюминкой аукциона, без сомнения, станет Русская коллекция Ричарда Зейнера-Хенриксена, норвежского коммерческого атташе.
    [Show full text]
  • Peasants “On the Run”: State Control, Fugitives, Social and Geographic Mobility in Imperial Russia, 1649-1796
    PEASANTS “ON THE RUN”: STATE CONTROL, FUGITIVES, SOCIAL AND GEOGRAPHIC MOBILITY IN IMPERIAL RUSSIA, 1649-1796 A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History By Andrey Gornostaev, M.A. Washington, DC May 7, 2020 Copyright 2020 by Andrey Gornostaev All Rights Reserved ii PEASANTS “ON THE RUN”: STATE CONTROL, FUGITIVES, SOCIAL AND GEOGRAPHIC MOBILITY IN IMPERIAL RUSSIA, 1649-1796 Andrey Gornostaev, M.A. Thesis Advisers: James Collins, Ph.D. and Catherine Evtuhov, Ph.D. ABSTRACT This dissertation explores the issue of fugitive peasants by focusing primarily on the Volga-Urals region of Russia and situating it within the broader imperial population policy between 1649 and 1796. In the Law Code of 1649, Russia definitively bound peasants of all ranks to their official places of residence to facilitate tax collection and provide a workforce for the nobility serving in the army. In the ensuing century and a half, the government introduced new censuses, internal passports, and monetary fines; dispatched investigative commissions; and coerced provincial authorities and residents into surveilling and policing outsiders. Despite these legislative measures and enforcement mechanisms, many thousands of peasants left their localities in search of jobs, opportunities, and places to settle. While many fugitives toiled as barge haulers, factory workers, and agriculturalists, some turned to brigandage and river piracy. Others employed deception or forged passports to concoct fictitious identities, register themselves in villages and towns, and negotiate their status within the existing social structure.
    [Show full text]
  • CABRI-Volga Report Deliverable D2
    CABRI-Volga Report Deliverable D2 CABRI - Cooperation along a Big River: Institutional coordination among stakeholders for environmental risk management in the Volga Basin Environmental Risk Management in the Volga Basin: Overview of present situation and challenges in Russia and the EU Co-authors of the CABRI-Volga D2 Report This Report is produced by Nizhny Novgorod State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering and the International Ocean Institute with the collaboration of all CABRI-Volga partners. It is edited by the project scientific coordinator (EcoPolicy). The contact details of contributors to this Report are given below: Rupprecht Consult - Forschung & RC Germany s.rupprecht@rupprecht-consult.de Beratung GmbH Environmental Policy Research and EcoPolicy Russia enikitina@mtu-net.ru Consulting United Nations Educational, Scientific UNESCO Russia m.prchalova@unesco.ru and Cultural Organisation MO Nizhny Novgorod State University of NNSUACE Russia iro@nngasu.ru Architecture and Civil Engineering Saratov State Socio-Economic SSEU Russia umansky@ssea.runnet.ru University Caspian Marine Scientific and KASPMNIZ Russia kaspmniz@astranet.ru Research Center of RosHydromet Autonomous Non-commercial Cadaster Russia kad@yaroslavl.ru Organisation (ANO) Institute of Environmental Economics and Natural Resources Accounting "Cadaster" Ecological Projects Consulting EPCI Russia eco-project@mtu-net.ru Institute Open joint-stock company Ammophos Russia syp@ammophos.ru "Ammophos" United Nations University Institute for UNU/EHS Germany bogardi@es.unu.edu
    [Show full text]
  • Atmospheric Impacts of the 2010 Russian Wildfires: Integrating
    Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 10031–10056, 2011 www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/10031/2011/ Atmospheric doi:10.5194/acp-11-10031-2011 Chemistry © Author(s) 2011. CC Attribution 3.0 License. and Physics Atmospheric impacts of the 2010 Russian wildfires: integrating modelling and measurements of an extreme air pollution episode in the Moscow region I. B. Konovalov1,2, M. Beekmann2, I. N. Kuznetsova3, A. Yurova3, and A. M. Zvyagintsev4 1Institute of Applied Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Nizhniy Novgorod, Russia 2Laboratoire Inter-Universitaire de Systemes` Atmospheriques,´ CNRS, UMR7583, Universite´ Paris-Est and Universite´ Paris 7, Creteil,´ France 3Hydrometeorological Centre of Russia, Moscow, Russia 4Central Aerological Laboratory, Dolgoprudny, Russia Received: 15 March 2011 – Published in Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.: 19 April 2011 Revised: 16 September 2011 – Accepted: 27 September 2011 – Published: 4 October 2011 Abstract. Numerous wildfires provoked by an unprece- uation. Indeed, ozone concentrations were simulated to be dented intensive heat wave caused continuous episodes of episodically very large (>400 µg m−3) even when fire emis- extreme air pollution in several Russian cities and densely sions were omitted in the model. It was found that fire emis- populated regions, including the Moscow region. This paper sions increased ozone production by providing precursors for analyzes the evolution of the surface concentrations of CO, ozone formation (mainly VOC), but also inhibited the pho- PM10 and ozone over the Moscow region during the 2010 tochemistry by absorbing and scattering solar radiation. In heat wave by integrating available ground based and satel- contrast, diagnostic model runs indicate that ozone concen- lite measurements with results of a mesoscale model.
    [Show full text]
  • Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University
    RUSSIAN GEOGRAPHICAL SOCIETY FACULTY OF GEOGRAPHY, LOMONOSOV MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHY, RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES No. 04 (v. 08) 2015 GEOGRAPHY ENVIRONMENT SUSTAINABILITY EDITORIAL BOARD EDITORSINCHIEF: Kasimov Nikolay S. Kotlyakov Vladimir M. Vandermotten Christian Lomonosov Moscow State Russian Academy of Sciences Université Libre de Bruxelles, University, Faculty of Geography, Institute of Geography, Belgium 04|2015 Russia Russia Tikunov Vladimir S. (Secretary-General) Kroonenberg Salomon Lomonosov Moscow State University, Delft University of Technology 2 GES Faculty of Geography, Russia Department of Applied Earth Sciences, Baklanov Alexander The Netherlands Danish Meteorological Institute, Kulmala Markku Denmark University of Helsinki, Division of Baklanov Petr Ya. Atmospheric Sciences, Finland Russian Academy of Sciences, Malkhazova Svetlana M. Pacific Institute of Geography, Russia Lomonosov Moscow State University, Chalkley Brian Faculty of Geography, Russia University of Plymouth, UK Meadows Michael E. Chubarova Natalya E. University of Cape Town, Department Lomonosov Moscow State University, of Environmental and Geographical Sciences Faculty of Geography, Russia South Africa De Maeyer Philippe Nefedova Tatyana G. Ghent University, Russian Academy of Sciences, Department of Geography, Belgium Institute of Geography, Russia Dobrolubov Sergey A. O’Loughlin John Lomonosov Moscow State University, University of Colorado at Boulder, Faculty of Geography, Russia Institute of Behavioral Sciences, USA Haigh Martin Pedroli Bas Oxford Brookes University, Wageningen University, Department of Social Sciences, UK The Netherlands Gulev Sergey K. Radovanovic Milan Russian Academy of Sciences, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Institute of Oceanology, Russia Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić”, Serbia Guo Huadong Sokratov Sergei A. Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Institute of Remote Sensing Faculty of Geography, Russia and Digital Earth, China Solomina Olga N.
    [Show full text]
  • The Types of the Mordvin Settlement Names
    Sándor Maticsák (Debrecen, Hungary) The Types of the Mordvin Settlement Names uring the millenia of its history the Volga-Oka river basin has served as a home for several peoples and ethnic groups. In the early D ages of the history of the region Iranian and Baltic influences can be revealed apart from the influences of the Volga–Oka tribes of an unknown ethnic origin. The traces of this contact can be found, besides the loan- words, in the most ancient stratum of hydronyms. Among the hydronyms of Mordovia we can separate a stratum that shows marked similarities with certain types of hydronyms of the European territory of Russia. On one hand, these names are not transparent etymologically, cannot be derived from any of today’s known languages, on the other hand, morphological homologies connect them: the suffixes that can be separated in these names have a CV form, and they end in - a (the only exception is - im ). The large zone of names that seem to be morphologically similar extend from North Russia through Yaroslav, Kostroma, Nizhnij Novgorod and Ryazan as far as to the southern border of Mordovia. Among the hydronyms of Mordovia, on the basis of morphological criteria, the following probably belong to this ancient stratum: Amorda; Juzga, Lu ńga, Ožga, Väžga; A ťma, Čaše ľma, Lo śma, Luhma, Ľas ťma, Pirma; A ľza; Šadim, Kuldim, Ur ľeďim. A serious debate unfolded in the 1950s and 1960s about the origin of this seemingly ancient hydronymic stratum, and the different opinions crystallised principally in M ATVEEV ’s and S EREBRENNIKOV ’s theories.
    [Show full text]