Citation Style Copyright Constance Bouchard

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Citation Style Copyright Constance Bouchard Citation style Constance Bouchard: Rezension von: Pierre Monnet (Hg.): Bouvines 1214-2014. Histoire et mémoire d'une bataille. Eine Schlacht zwischen Geschichte und Erinnerung. Approches et comparaisons franco-allemandes. Deutsch-französische Ansätze und Vergleiche, Bochum: Verlag Dr. Dieter Winkler 2016, in sehepunkte 17 (2017), Nr. 4 [15.04.2017], URL:http://www.sehepunkte.de/2017/04/29886.html First published: http://www.sehepunkte.de/2017/04/29886.html copyright This article may be downloaded and/or used within the private copying exemption. Any further use without permission of the rights owner shall be subject to legal licences (§§ 44a-63a UrhG / German Copyright Act). sehepunkte 17 (2017), Nr. 4 Pierre Monnet (Hg.): Bouvines 1214-2014 The 1214 battle of Bouvines is usually remembered in the Anglophone world for the triumph of King Philip II Augustus of France against the English forces, resulting in England losing all hope of controlling Normandy and most of the rest of the Angevin empire. It is generally treated as one of the key events leading to Magna Carta as well as forcing the Anglo-Norman kings and aristocracy to become fully English, not Norman. German forces under Otto IV were also on the losing side, but their defeat is never seen as equally momentous, even though Otto's failure helped lead to his fall and replacement as emperor by Frederick II. For the French, in contrast, the day of the battle has long been considered one of the principal "days that made France." This volume is the result of a joint French-German conference commemorating the 800th anniversary of the battle, and contains seven articles (four in French, three in German) focused not just on the events but on how they were remembered. The conference identified itself as part of a movement toward European unification, but German and French historiographies are clearly still far apart. For French scholars especially, Bouvines has long been a critical marker of the establishment of strong centralized government, as epitomized by Georges Duby's classic Le dimanche de Bouvines (1973). Duby's forty-year-old work is invoked throughout in highly reverent tones. For the Germans, the battle is a less significant turning point. The articles are similarly divided, the French ones all having a celebratory cast while the German ones are more technically focused. Interestingly, the articles in German focus on the battle's effects in France much more than in the Holy Roman Empire. The addition of an English perspective would have been good; as it is, the volume seems somehow incomplete. There are no more than a handful of books and articles in English in the footnotes. Bouvines should have been an excellent battle to study through the lens of memory, because it was documented by numerous chroniclers, most notably by Guillaume le Breton, who was an eye witness. We thus have multiple examples of contemporaries and near-contemporaries seeking to shape an appropriate memoria of events. This overall theme is addressed in the book through four sections: "a battle," "a context," "a significance," and "a memory"; the first three have two articles each, the last just one. Given that, all of the articles could fall under any of these abstract headings, it is not clear why the divisions were thought necessary. Under "a battle," Xavier Hélary notes that Guillaume le Breton discussed only the exploits of knights whom he could treat as honorable and chivalrous, suggesting that the very first written description of the conflict sought to make it into something glorious. Even the German knights could be honorable in his account, but not the several French lords who fought on the wrong side or in the wrong way. In one of the longest articles, historiographically oriented, Dominique Barthélemy discusses the sergeants at arms and foot soldiers who accompanied the knights into battle, noting that there were a great many of them. Thus he suggests that one might be justified in seeing this as a "national" battle, as it was seen in the nineteenth century, not merely a battle waged by elites, even though the earliest accounts all stressed the role of the knights. He then backs off, feeling it necessary to explain that nineteenth-century historians went too far in making Bouvines a milestone for the Third Estate. In the section titled "a context," Élisabeth Lalou agrees with earlier scholars that the battle represents the beginning of a "Capetian moment," which lasted a tidy century, until the death of Philip IV in 1314. During this period, she argues, the structures of the Capetian state were thoroughly established, in spite of some tensions. In the first German article, Thomas Foerster makes the solid but unoriginal point that Bouvines was less a set battle between nations as a conflict between complex networks of alliance, stretching from Scandinavia to Sicily, and that during the twelfth century the relations between some of these networks had been quite amicable. In the next section, "a significance," Hermann Kamp provides what is probably the best article in the volume, in which he argues that Bouvines should be seen as a political as much as a military triumph. He discusses the quite deliberate efforts Philip II made to construct a glorious memory of the event through propaganda and ceremonies, starting with having Guillaume le Breton compose his account, and suggests that control over Flanders was as significant a goal as Normandy. In another strong article, Malte Prietzel adds more detail on the construction of propaganda, suggesting that the Capetians' created image of a glorious turning point still influences scholars. For example, Duby's book's title, "The Sunday of Bouvines," gave the battle an almost liturgical aspect. The final section, "a memory," consists of just one article by Jean-Marie Moeglin, which is more a discussion of how anniversaries of certain events are constructed than an analysis of thirteenth-century sources. It also serves as the volume's conclusion, noting how Bouvines was remembered and commemorated over eight centuries. This book disappoints because it could have been so much more. Most of the articles are heavily historiographical, with few new points to make. The individual pieces are all very narrow, but it would have been better to have a more wide-ranging treatment of how the battle was described, remembered, and re-remembered over the course of the thirteenth century, being referenced to justify or explain other actions and events. Perhaps one of the participants (Kamp, Prietzel) could go on to write such a book..
Recommended publications
  • INFORMATION to USERS This Manuscript Has Been Reproduced
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from aiy type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photogrq>hs, print bleedthrou^ substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photogr£q)hs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for aiy photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Information Com pany 300 North Z eeb Road. Ann Arbor. Ivll 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Order Number 9517109 Unofficial histories of France in the late Middle Ages. (Volumes I and n) Zale, Sanford C., Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Late-Medieval France
    Late-Medieval France: A Nation under Construction A study of French national identity formation and the emerging of national consciousness, before and during the Hundred Years War, 1200-1453 Job van den Broek MA History of Politics and Society Dr. Christian Wicke Utrecht University 22 June 2020 Word count: 13.738 2 “Ah! Doulce France! Amie, je te lairay briefment”1 -Attributed to Bertrand du Guesclin, 1380 Images on front page: The kings of France, England, Navarre and the duke of Burgundy (as Count of Charolais), as depicted in the Grand Armorial Équestre de la Toison d’Or, 1435- 1438. 1 Cuvelier in Charrière, volume 2, pp 320. ”Ah, sweet France, my friend, I must leave you very soon.” Translation my own. 2 3 Abstract Whether nations and nationalism are ancient or more recent phenomena is one of the core debates of nationalism studies. Since the 1980’s, modernism, claiming that nations are distinctively modern, has been the dominant view. In this thesis, I challenge this dominant view by doing an extensive case-study into late-medieval France, applying modernist definitions and approaches to a pre-modern era. France has by many regarded as one of the ‘founding fathers’ of the club of nations and has a long and rich history and thus makes a case-study for such an endeavour. I start with mapping the field of French identity formation in the thirteenth century, which mostly revolved around the royal court in Paris. With that established, I move on to the Hundred Years War and the consequences of this war for French identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Magna-Carta-Timeline.Pdf
    Date Event 6 February King John sails for La Rochelle to begin a military campaign against the French. 1214 Many of his barons refuse to accompany him, or send knights to serve in his army. June-July 1214 John’s barons from Poitou (France) desert his army. With his path blocked by the French Prince Louis, John is unable to join his allies in Flanders, and is forced to retreat to La Rochelle. 27 July 1214 King John’s allies, the Flemings, Germans and an English contingent led by the earl of Salisbury, are defeated by the French at the Battle of Bouvines (Northern France). October 1214 John returns to England following the failure of his military campaign in France that he had spent years planning. 4 March 1215 Facing baronial revolt, John declares his intention to go on crusade to the Holy Land. It is hoped that this will secure support from the Pope against his rebellious barons. 5 May 1215 The barons renounce their fealty (allegiance) to John, and name Robert fitz Walter as their leader. 17 May 1215 The city of London welcomes the rebel barons, dashing John’s hopes for a quick victory and end to the civil war. 10 June 1215 John meets the rebel leaders at Runnymede meadow by the River Thames near Staines. 15 June 1215 King John sets his seal to a draft of Magna Carta, thereby accepting its terms. 19 June 1215 The rebel barons formally make peace with King John, and renew their allegiance. 7 July 1215 The pope excommunicates the barons who have rebelled against their king.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebook Download the Hundred Years War: the English in France 1337
    THE HUNDRED YEARS WAR: THE ENGLISH IN FRANCE 1337-1453 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Desmond Seward | 320 pages | 26 Aug 1999 | Penguin Putnam Inc | 9780140283617 | English | New York, NY, United States The Hundred Years War: the English in France 1337-1453 PDF Book Interestingly, as Seward notes in the foreword, he emphasizes the financial aspects of the war which was an illuminating choice in my opinion. Le Patourel, J. In England, political forces over time came to oppose the costly venture. If the unborn child was male, he would become king; if not, Charles left the choice of his successor to the nobles. I will move on to read more detailed histories of the period. The Worlds of Medieval Europe. Although primarily a dynastic conflict , the war inspired French and English nationalism. Inspired by Joan, the French took several English strongholds on the Loire. In , a treaty was signed between France and Scotland during the reign of Philip the Fair. Jun 19, Rich rated it it was amazing Shelves: history , college. Archived from the original on 23 September A very straightforward, linear account of the Hundred Years' War from a decidedly English-as-protagonists-leaning point of view. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography online ed. This is my story of survival. After all, many of these men and women were pseudo-documented by Shakespeare so there is much grist for the mill. What is undeniable is that for a few months many Frenchmen thought they were fighting a holy war, and the English went in terror of the Maid and her sorceries.
    [Show full text]
  • King John: England, Magna Carta and the Making of a Tyrant, Stephen Church (London: Pan Books, 2015)
    2016 _ III King John: England, Magna Carta and the making of a Tyrant, Stephen Church (London: Pan Books, 2015). Review by: Stephen Donnachie Review: King John: England, Magna Carta and the making of a Tyrant King John: England, Magna Carta and the making of a Tyrant. By Stephen Church. London: Pan Books, 2015. ISBN: 978-1-4472-4195-9. xxxi + 334 pp. £25. he association of King John with tyranny, bad governance, and the abuse of power is an image long accepted of England’s most infamous monarch. John’s negative reputation was one well T known to contemporary chroniclers and avidly seized upon by later writers to villainise his rule. John’s reputation has proceeded him down through the centuries, his crimes deemed inexcusable and his reign viewed as an abysmal failure. Compared to the successes of his illustrious father Henry II, bellicose brother Richard I, and great rival Philip II Augustus of France, John’s achievements have always appeared as shallow victories and he as the least of the “devil’s brood”. Despite his longstanding legend of cruelty more recent works upon John have attempted to rehabilitate him, presenting the image of a complex individual and talented administrator whose abilities and accomplishments are both admirable and praiseworthy. However, these attempts to reform John’s image and to reassess his reign return to his key failures: the loss of Normandy and other continental possessions, the defeat at the battle of Bouvines and short road to rebellion and Magna Carta that followed. Stephen Church in this thoroughly engaging and well written biography does not attempt to dispel the notion of John as a tyrant and cast him in a new light, nor does he seek to provide us with a misunderstood hero or melodramatic villain.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Plantagenet Kings of England [email protected]
    History of the Plantagenet Kings of England [email protected] http://newsummer.com/presentations/Plantagenet Introduction Plantagenet: Pronunciation & Usage Salic Law: "of Salic land no portion of the inheritance shall come to a woman: but the whole inheritance of the land shall come to the male sex." Primogeniture: inheritance moves from eldest son to youngest, with variations Shakespeare's Plantagenet plays The Life and Death of King John Edward III (probably wrote part of it) Richard II Henry IV, Part 1 Henry IV, Part 2 Henry V Henry VI, Part 1 Henry VI, Part 2 Henry VI, Part 3 Richard III Brief assessments The greatest among them: Henry II, Edward I, Edward III The unfulfilled: Richard I, Henry V The worst: John, Edward II, Richard II, Richard III The tragic: Henry VI The Queens Matilda of Scotland, c1080­1118 (Henry I) Empress Matilda, 1102­1167 (Geoffrey Plantagent) Eleanor of Aquitaine, c1122­1204 (Henry II) Isabella of France, c1295­1348 (Edward II) Margaret of Anjou, 1430­1482 (Henry VI) Other key notables Richard de Clare "Strongbow," 1130­1176 William the Marshal, 1st Earl of Pembroke, 1147­1219 Simon de Montfort, 6th Earl of Leicester, c1208­1265 Roger Mortimer, Earl of March, 1287­1330 Henry "Hotspur" Percy, 1364­1403 Richard Neville "The Kingmaker," 1428­1471 Some of the important Battles Hastings (Wm I, 1066): Conquest Lincoln (Stephen, 1141): King Stephen captured Arsuf (Richard I, 1191): Richard defeats Salidin Bouvines (John, 1214): Normandy lost to the French Lincoln, 2nd (Henry III, 1217): Pembroke defeats
    [Show full text]
  • Open Finalthesis Weber Pdf.Pdf
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES FRACTURED POLITICS: DIPLOMACY, MARRIAGE, AND THE LAST PHASE OF THE HUNDRED YEARS WAR ARIEL WEBER SPRING 2014 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in Medieval Studies with honors in Medieval Studies Reviewed and approved* by the following: Benjamin T. Hudson Professor of History and Medieval Studies Thesis Supervisor/Honors Adviser Robert Edwards Professor of English and Comparative Literature Thesis Reader * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT The beginning of the Hundred Years War came about from relentless conflict between France and England, with roots that can be traced the whole way to the 11th century, following the Norman invasion of England. These periods of engagement were the result of English nobles both living in and possessing land in northwest France. In their efforts to prevent further bloodshed, the monarchs began to engage in marriage diplomacy; by sending a young princess to a rival country, the hope would be that her native people would be unwilling to wage war on a royal family that carried their own blood. While this method temporarily succeeded, the tradition would create serious issues of inheritance, and the beginning of the last phase of the Hundred Years War, and the last act of success on the part of the English, the Treaty of Troyes, is the culmination of the efforts of the French kings of the early 14th century to pacify their English neighbors, cousins, and nephews. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Plantagenet Claim to France...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Magna Carta Preparation Materials for Virtual Classroom (KS 3)
    The National Archives Education Service Magna Carta Preparation materials for virtual classroom (KS 3) DL 10/71 Magna Carta Preparation materials for virtual classroom (KS 3) Contents Teacher’s notes 3 Document 1: DL 10/71 4 Magna Carta, 1225 Transcript 1: DL 10/71 5 Magna Carta, 1225 Document 2: C 66/81 6 Written public announcement of the peace terms accepted by King Henry III and the community of the realm, 1264 Transcript 2: C 66/81 7 Written public announcement of the peace terms accepted by King Henry III and the community of the realm, 1264 Document 3: C 53/86 8 Charter confirming the rights set out in Magna Carta, 1300 Transcript 3: C 53/86 9 Charter confirming the rights set out in Magna Carta, 1300 Document 4: C 65/62 10 Charges against King Richard for which he was deposed, 1399 Transcript 4: C 65/62 12 Charges against King Richard for which he was deposed, 1399 Historian’s notes 13 Dr. Matt Phillips provides further background information on Magna Carta 2 Magna Carta Preparation materials for virtual classroom (KS 3) Teacher’s notes Students do not need to do any work in preparation for this virtual classroom. Please do not show students copies of the following documents before the session. However, if there are students who have visual impairments and may have difficulty viewing the screen during the session, please enlarge copies of the documents for them to refer to. This session introduces students to The National Archives and to the history of Magna Carta.
    [Show full text]
  • 127179794.23.Pdf
    The Chronicle of Melrose Abbey A STRATIGRAPHIC EDITION I. Introduction and Facsimile DAUVIT BROUN JULIAN HARRISON Scottish History Society 2007 fcs. SH/ SCOTTISH HISTORY SOCIETY SIXTH SERIES VOLUME I The Chronicle of Melrose Abbey A Stratigraphic Edition Volume I Introduction and Facsimile Edition The Chronicle of Melrose Abbey is the principal source for Scottish history in the late twelfth and thirteenth centuries; it is also a remark- able survival of a chronicle-manuscript that grew for over a century. It is thus of great importance to historians and palaeographers alike. This new edition is accompanied by a detailed introduction, offering a full account of scribes; a collation of the manuscript; a discussion of the manuscripts evolution and binding-history in the light of its disbinding in 2005-d; a new ‘stratigraphic’ approach to the chronicle’s development; and a full account of the manuscript’s history. There is also a discussion of Cistercian chronicling in the British Isles. Of particular interest is the recognition that the manu- script comprised part of British Library MS Cotton Julius B. XIII as well as Cotton Faustina B. IX, shedding new light on the nature of the original codex and its date. The book is accompanied by a DVD containing digitised images of the whole manuscript. Dr Dauvit Broun is a senior lecturer in Scottish History at the University of Glasgow Julian Harrison is a Research Fellow in Scottish History at the University of Glasgow and is attached to the Department of Western Manuscripts at the British Library SCOTTISH CHRONICLES PROJECT This is the first of a number of volumes on Scottish chronicles which will appear occasionally as part of the main series of annual volumes published by the Scottish History Society.
    [Show full text]
  • French Chivalry Painter, Sidney
    French Chivalry Painter, Sidney Published by Johns Hopkins University Press Painter, Sidney. French Chivalry: Chivalric Ideas and Practices in Mediaeval France. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1961. Project MUSE. doi:10.1353/book.72155. https://muse.jhu.edu/. For additional information about this book https://muse.jhu.edu/book/72155 [ Access provided at 24 Sep 2021 17:04 GMT with no institutional affiliation ] This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. HOPKINS OPEN PUBLISHING ENCORE EDITIONS Sidney Painter French Chivalry Chivalric Ideas and Practices in Mediaeval France Open access edition supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities / Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book Program. © 2019 Johns Hopkins University Press Published 2019 Johns Hopkins University Press 2715 North Charles Street Baltimore, Maryland 21218-4363 www.press.jhu.edu The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. CC BY-NC-ND ISBN-13: 978-1-4214-3318-9 (open access) ISBN-10: 1-4214-3318-4 (open access) ISBN-13: 978-1-4214-3316-5 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 1-4214-3316-8 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN-13: 978-1-4214-3317-2 (electronic) ISBN-10: 1-4214-3317-6 (electronic) This page supersedes the copyright page included in the original publication of this work. FRENCH CHIVALRY Chivalric Ideas and Practices in Mediaeval France LONDON: HUMPHREY MILFORD OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS PARIS: LIBRAIRIE E. DROZ FRENCH CHIVALRY Chivalric Ideas and Practices in Mediaeval France By SIDNEY PAINTER ' BALTIMORE THE JOHNS HOPKINS PRESS COPYRIGHT 1940, THE JOHNS HOPKINS PRESS PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY J, H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Invasion of Prince Louis of France to England, 1216–1217 OPEN ACCESS
    The Invasion of Prince Louis of France to England, 1216–1217 OPEN ACCESS Jan Malý In the middle of the month of June 1215, an assembly of English barons, currently in revolt against King John of England, called “Lackland” met him in Runnymede be- tween London and Windsor. They came up with a series of articles, limiting royal power and establishing boundaries between the king and his people. After few days of negotiations, King John finally agreed to put his royal seal on the document, which became one of the most famous not only in the history of British Isles but also in the history of whole world. On 19 June of 1215, Magna Carta was born.1 The path to Runnymede was the beginning of serious civil war, which would tear England apart for almost two years, during which King John would be deposed and replaced by a man, who wouldn’t be expected by many — an heir to the French throne, Prince Louis. What was the true purpose of Louis’s invitation and how it eventually ended? We will try to reveal in following lines. Before we can examine the story of “King Louis of England”, it’s necessary to look on the reasons for his English adventure. The reign of King John,2 who succeeded his brother Richard in 1199, was in many ways troubled and full of conflicts. After he had settled his initial problems with succession, when he had to struggle against his nephew Arthur of Brittany (disappeared in 1203, probably killed by his uncle John) 1 One of the most acknowledged and fullest work about Magna Carta is J.
    [Show full text]
  • Intellectuals, the Press, and the Dreyfus Affair
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Honors Program in History (Senior Honors Theses) Department of History April 2008 The Affair or the State: Intellectuals, the Press, and the Dreyfus Affair David Rimoch University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hist_honors Rimoch, David, "The Affair or the State: Intellectuals, the Press, and the Dreyfus Affair" (2008). Honors Program in History (Senior Honors Theses). 8. https://repository.upenn.edu/hist_honors/8 A Senior Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Honors in History. Faculty Advisor: Kristen Stromberg Childers This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hist_honors/8 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Affair or the State: Intellectuals, the Press, and the Dreyfus Affair Abstract In his introduction to The Age of Revolution historian Eric Hobsbawm considers "a few English words which were invented, or gained their modern meanings, substantially in the period" between 1789 and 1848. The list includes 'capitalism', 'socialism', 'aristocracy', 'liberal', 'conservative', 'nationality', 'crisis', 'journalism', and 'ideology'. For Hobsbawm, "To imagine the modern world without these words (i.e. without the things and concepts for which they provide names) is to measure the profundity of the revolution which broke out between 1789 and 1848, and forms the greatest transformation in human history since the remote times when men invented agriculture and metallurgy, writing, the city and the state." This analysis is relevant when thinking of the Dreyfus case. To imagine the Affair without words such as 'capitalism', 'aristocracy', 'nationality', 'crisis', or 'ideology', is not hard, it is impossible.
    [Show full text]