DOCSLIB.ORG

Project Definition Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project Definition Report Trans-Hudson Express (THE) Project Preliminary Engineering Project Definition Report August 21, 2008 Project Definition Report Revisions REVISION HISTORY Revision Date Description 0 12/11/07 Issued for NJ TRANSIT review 1 1/18/08 Incorporates post 100% plans 2 4/4/08 Incorporates Final PE plans 3 8/21/08 Incorporates Extended PE updates NJT 06-046 2680 i 8-21-08 REV 3 Project Definition Report Contents Project Definition Report Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................... E-1 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................1-1 1.1 Scope of This Report...............................................................1-1 1.2 Project Overview......................................................................1-1 1.2.1 Service Level Increases ......................................................................1-1 1.2.2 ARC Tracks and Tunnels ....................................................................1-1 1.2.3 Loop Tracks.........................................................................................1-2 1.2.4 Frank R. Lautenberg Station Upgrade.................................................1-3 1.2.5 West End Wye.....................................................................................1-3 1.2.6 NY Penn Station Expansion ................................................................1-3 1.2.7 Tunnel and Station Ventilation.............................................................1-3 1.2.8 Maintenance and Storage Facilities ....................................................1-4 1.2.9 Rolling Stock........................................................................................1-4 1.3 Project Objectives ...................................................................1-4 1.4 Sub- Project Packages....................................................................1-5 2 DESIGN STANDARDS...........................................................................2-1 2.1 General .....................................................................................2-1 2.2 Acronyms .................................................................................2-1 2.3 Codes, Manuals, Specifications, and Standards ..................2-3 3 ALIGNMENT CONSIDERATIONS .........................................................3-1 3.1 Overview...................................................................................3-1 3.2 Horizontal Alignment Description ..........................................3-1 3.2.1 New Jersey..........................................................................................3-1 3.2.2 Hudson River.......................................................................................3-3 3.2.3 New York.............................................................................................3-3 3.2.4 NY Penn Station Expansion ................................................................3-4 3.3 Maintenance and Storage Facilities .......................................3-4 3.4 Vertical Alignment Description...............................................3-5 3.4.1 New Jersey..........................................................................................3-5 3.4.2 Hudson River.......................................................................................3-6 3.4.3 New York.............................................................................................3-6 4 OPERATIONS AND CAPACITY ............................................................4-1 4.1 General .....................................................................................4-1 4.2 Project Elements......................................................................4-1 4.2.1 New Jersey Loop Track and Surface Alignments................................4-1 4.3 Tunnels and Caverns ..............................................................4-4 4.4 NY Penn Station Expansion....................................................4-6 4.4.1 NYPSE Service Plan ...........................................................................4-6 4.4.2 NYPSE Operations.............................................................................4-7 4.4.3 Station Operations Center ...................................................................4-7 4.5 Railroad Systems.....................................................................4-8 NJT 06-046 2680 ii 8-21-08 REV 3 Project Definition Report Contents 4.6 Kearny Mid-day Storage Yard.................................................4-8 4.6.1 Rail Access to Yard ...........................................................................4-11 4.6.2 Trainwasher.......................................................................................4-11 4.6.3 Fueling and Sanding Facility .............................................................4-11 4.6.4 Service Functions..............................................................................4-12 4.6.5 Yard Operations ................................................................................4-12 4.6.6 Welfare Facility..................................................................................4-12 5 PE ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT .....................................................5-1 5.1 General .....................................................................................5-1 5.2 New Jersey Surface PE Alternative Assessment..................5-1 5.3 Hudson River PE Alternative Assessment ............................5-3 5.4 New York PE Alignment Assessment ....................................5-3 5.5 Station Alternative Assessment .............................................5-4 5.6 Station Entrances ....................................................................5-5 5.7 Fan Plants.................................................................................5-6 5.7.1 New Jersey Fan Plants........................................................................5-6 5.7.2 New York Fan Plants...........................................................................5-7 5.8 Kearny Yard..............................................................................5-7 6 GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS ............................................................6-1 6.1 Geologic Settings ....................................................................6-1 6.1.1 Regional Geology................................................................................6-1 6.2 New Jersey Geology................................................................6-2 6.2.1 New Jersey Physiography...................................................................6-2 6.2.2 New Jersey Bedrock Geology .............................................................6-2 6.2.3 New Jersey Overburden Geology .......................................................6-3 6.3 Hudson River Physiography...................................................6-4 6.3.1 Hudson River Physiography ................................................................6-4 6.3.2 Hudson River Bedrock Geology ..........................................................6-4 6.3.3 Hudson River Overburden Geology ....................................................6-4 6.4 New York Geology ...................................................................6-5 6.4.1 New York Physiology...........................................................................6-5 6.4.2 New York Bedrock Geology ................................................................6-5 6.4.3 New York Overburden Geology..........................................................6-5 6.5 Site Geotechnical Conditions .................................................6-6 6.5.1 Kearny Yard.........................................................................................6-6 6.5.2 Loop Tracks.........................................................................................6-7 6.5.3 NJ Surface Alignments ........................................................................6-9 6.5.4 Palisades Tunnels .............................................................................6-10 6.5.5 Hudson River Tunnels .......................................................................6-13 6.5.6 Manhattan Tunnels and NY Penn Station Expansion........................6-16 6.6 References .............................................................................6-21 7 ENVIRONMENTAL.................................................................................7-1 7.1 Introduction..............................................................................7-1 7.2 Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment........................7-1 7.3 Subsurface Investigations ......................................................7-4 7.4 Environmental Subsurface Investigation Report..................7-5 8 SEISMIC DESIGN...................................................................................8-1 8.1 General .....................................................................................8-1 NJT 06-046 2680 iii 8-21-08 REV 3 Project Definition Report Contents 8.2 Regional Security ....................................................................8-1 8.2.1 Seismic Hazard...................................................................................8-1 8.2.2 Design peak Ground Motion Parameters and Design Response Spectra ................................................................................................8-2 8.3 Geotechnical Seismic Design.................................................8-3
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HVAC, ACCESS and LIGHTING CONTROLS FACT SHEET
    HVAC, ACCESS and LIGHTING CONTROLS Established 1985 FACT SHEET PECONIC ENERGY PRODUCTS CORPORATION (“PEPCO™”) reduces energy usage of Gas, Oil, Electric and Steam in multi-family residential, commercial and industrial facilities etc... by regulating, monitoring and controlling building mechanical and electrical systems (Boilers, Pumps, Fans, Chillers, AHU’s, RTU’s, FCU’s and Lighting) via Computerized Building and Energy Automation Systems powered by DELTA CONTROLS www.deltacontrols.com. PEPCO™ products include the following: 1. Custom Control Systems ( H.V.A.C, Lighting, Access Control Systems) 2. ENERGUARD™ - Large Building Wireless HEAT COMPUTER (Prices starting at $12,000) 3. HEAT-MASTER™ - Small Building Wireless HEAT COMPUTER (Prices starting $7,500) 4. HEAT-CON™ - Residential or Small Building HEAT COMPUTER (Prices starting at $2,900) 5. FUEL TANK LEVEL MONITORING (FTM) - Reports Fuel Deliveries And Oil Tank Level. 6. BACnet Network Ready Wall Thermostats 7. Wireless Control System PEPCO is a CON-ED Market Partner ( http://www.conedci.com/MPAwards.aspx ). As a Market Partner prospective PEPCO customers can receive up to 70% rebate toward the purchase price of a PEPCO system. Since 2010 PEPCO customers have received over $2,600,000 in Utility Rebates. • Reduce building energy usage and operating costs by up to 50% • Monitor and Control a single building or a portfolio of properties via IPAD, Cell Phone, Laptop or PC. • Utility Rebates of up to 70% of purchase price with Return On Investment in 2 years or less • Demand Response and Permanent Load Curtailment • Easily expandable to include Card Access, Lighting Controls, CCTV, Electric and Water Metering/Sub-Metering • Provide more comfortable tempered environments for tenants PEPCO™ offers 24/7/365 remote monitoring of facilities from our Deer Park facility.
    [Show full text]
  • SENTENCE LORENZ; FAMOUSCOACH Florida’S Unwelcome Guest—Capone PRESIDENT ADVISES SAYSDRYLAW DIES on GALLOWS CALLMUTIA ISU a Lld R E DISPUTE AUGUST 12Th
    ; -T ^ WEATHER T : J n e t p r e s s r u n rorepact by W««t^jr Bm u. AVERAGE DAILY CIRCULATION Hartford. for the Month of March, 1930 \ Partiy Oiottdy .and pqnt|atied opM tonight; Friday fair. 5,511 , '■ Blenibera of the Audit Dareaa of Clrcnlnttons PRICE THREE CENTS SOUTH MANCHESTER, CONN., THURSDAY, APRIL 24, 1930. FOURTEEN‘ PAGES VOL. XLIV., NO. 175. '(Claimed Adverttslng on Page 13) SENTENCE LORENZ; FAMOUSCOACH Florida’s Unwelcome Guest—Capone PRESIDENT ADVISES SAYSDRYLAW DIES ON GALLOWS CALLMUTIA ISU A llD R E DISPUTE AUGUST 12th. Bill Roper Declares Threaten to Kill Score of WARSHIP CAPTAIN |(j|gf Executive Takes Hai^ I Secret Drinking Makes Guards If Not Released Hartford Youth Who Killed DAUGHTER OF DUCE COMMITS SUICIDE . > ^ ^ I Parents Fearful of Send- from Cage; IVouble Final­ In Controversy at White His Friend Found Guilty of IS MARRIED TODAY H ^gs Hiii)self in , His Cabin House Breakfast; Snti^ I ing Children to College. ly Averted. Just -teore British Crjaiser Murder in First Degree; S ta ^ for target Practice. BULLETIN With Senator Watson That Washington, April 24.— (A P .)— Portsmough, Eng., April 24.— His Statement at the Trial Miss Edda Mussolini Be­ Testimony that prohibition has fail­ (A P )—Tragedy came to the Columbus, Ohio, April 24.— British.cruiser Champion lying ed to prohibit in American colleges Lower Branch Should Act (A P )—Attorney General Gil­ at her berth here today. comes Wife of Count Ci- and neighborhood settlements, and Hartford, April 24.—(AP) — bert Gettman left Ohio. Peni­ The eraser was to have gone that Ontario province across the out on firing practice during the First— To Take Dp Mat­ Henry O.
    [Show full text]
  • Borough Hall Skyscraper Historic District Designation Report
    Cover Photograph: Court Street looking south along Skyscraper Row towards Brooklyn City Hall, now Brooklyn Borough Hall (1845-48, Gamaliel King) and the Brooklyn Municipal Building (1923-26, McKenzie, Voorhees & Gmelin). Christopher D. Brazee, 2011 Borough Hall Skyscraper Historic District Designation Report Prepared by Christopher D. Brazee Edited by Mary Beth Betts, Director of Research Photographs by Christopher D. Brazee Map by Jennifer L. Most Technical Assistance by Lauren Miller Commissioners Robert B. Tierney, Chair Pablo E. Vengoechea, Vice-Chair Frederick Bland Christopher Moore Diana Chapin Margery Perlmutter Michael Devonshire Elizabeth Ryan Joan Gerner Roberta Washington Michael Goldblum Kate Daly, Executive Director Mark Silberman, Counsel Sarah Carroll, Director of Preservation TABLE OF CONTENTS BOROUGH HALL SKYSCRAPER HISTORIC DISTRICT MAP ................... FACING PAGE 1 TESTIMONY AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ................................................................................ 1 BOROUGH HALL SKYSCRAPER HISTORIC DISTRICT BOUNDARIES ............................. 1 SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 3 THE HISTORICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BOROUGH HALL SKYSCRAPER HISTORIC DISTRICT ........................................................................................ 5 Early History and Development of Brooklyn‟s Civic Center ................................................... 5 Mid 19th Century Development
    [Show full text]
  • Skyscrapers and District Heating, an Inter-Related History 1876-1933
    Skyscrapers and District Heating, an inter-related History 1876-1933. Introduction: The aim of this article is to examine the relationship between a new urban and architectural form, the skyscraper, and an equally new urban infrastructure, district heating, both of witch were born in the north-east United States during the late nineteenth century and then developed in tandem through the 1920s and 1930s. These developments will then be compared with those in Europe, where the context was comparatively conservative as regards such innovations, which virtually never occurred together there. I will argue that, the finest example in Europe of skyscrapers and district heating planned together, at Villeurbanne near Lyons, is shown to be the direct consequence of American influence. Whilst central heating had appeared in the United Kingdom in the late eighteenth and the early nineteenth centuries, district heating, which developed the same concept at an urban scale, was realized in Lockport (on the Erie Canal, in New York State) in the 1880s. In United States were born the two important scientists in the fields of heating and energy, Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790) and Benjamin Thompson Rumford (1753-1814). Standard radiators and boilers - heating surfaces which could be connected to central or district heating - were also first patented in the United States in the late 1850s.1 A district heating system produces energy in a boiler plant - steam or high-pressure hot water - with pumps delivering the heated fluid to distant buildings, sometimes a few kilometers away. Heat is therefore used just as in other urban networks, such as those for gas and electricity.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 9: Architectural Historic Resources ......................................................9-1 A. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................9-1 B. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS ..............................................................................................9-1 C. METHODOLOGY.................................................................................................................9-2 1. OVERVIEW ..........................................................................................................................9-2 2. AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECT (APE) ..................................................................................9-3 3. CRITERIA AND REGULATIONS ............................................................................................9-3 D. EXISTING CONDITIONS ....................................................................................................9-4 1. BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................9-4 2. DESIGNATED AND ELIGIBLE ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES ..............................................9-5 a) Individually Designated, Listed, or Eligible Resources............................................................... 9-9 b) Garment Industry Resources.......................................................................................................9-22 c) Printing Industry Resources........................................................................................................9-32
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment D Evaluation of Alternative Alignments and Station Elements
    Attachment D Evaluation of Alternative Alignments and Station Elements ACCESS TO THE REGION’S CORE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FEIS Build Alternative Alignment Routing and Station and Ancillary Facility Location Selection Task 4.1.2 NJT Contract #03-118 July 31, 2008 Submitted by: Transit Link Consultants a Joint Venture of Parsons Brinckerhoff and SYSTRA Consulting In Association with: A.D. Marble & Company Anne Strauss-Wieder, Inc. In Group, Inc. K.M. Chng K.S. Engineers HDR/LMS Louis Berger & Associates Matrix New World Engineering, Inc. Organizational Learning Associates Robinson Aerial Surveys, Inc. Zetlin Strategic Communications Version FINAL WA#: 083 Task #: 4.1.2 ARC EIS FEIS Build Alternative Routing and Station Location Selection REPORT QUALITY CONTROL/QUALITY ASSURANCE Prepared by: Chris Taylor/Nathan Maack Date: 5/16/08 Reviewed by: Ruby Siegel Date: 5/16/08 Approved by: Tom Schulze Date: 07/31/2008 083_4.2_EG_R_Alternatives Analysis.doc Transit Link Consultants ARC EIS FEIS Build Alternative Routing and Station Location Selection 1. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 1 2. BUILD ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENT ROUTING AND STATION LOCATION SELECTION ................................................................................................................................. 2 3. NEW JERSEY ALIGNMENT.......................................................................................... 3 3.1 NEC ALIGNMENT .........................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • 1 C 100049 ZSM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION July 14, 2010
    CITY PLANNING COMMISSION July 14, 2010 / Calendar No. 31 C 100049 ZSM IN THE MATTER OF an application submitted by 401 Hotel REIT, LLC and 401 Commercial, L.P. pursuant to Sections 197-c and 201 of the New York City Charter for the grant of a special permit pursuant to Sections 81-066(b) and 81-254 of the Zoning Resolution to modify: 1. the height and setback regulations of Section 81-27 (Alternative Height and Setback Regulations - Daylight Evaluation); and 2. the Mandatory District Plan Elements of Sections 81-42 (Retail Continuity along Designated Streets), 81-43 (Street Wall Continuity Along Designated Streets), 81-45 (Pedestrian Circulation Space), 81-47 (Major Building Entrances), and the design standards for pedestrian circulation spaces of Section 37-53(f) (Sidewalk Widening); in connection with a proposed commercial development on property located at 15 Penn Plaza (Block 808, Lots 40, 1001 and 1002) in a C6-6 District, within the Special Midtown District (partially within the Penn Center Subdistrict) Borough of Manhattan, Community District 5. This application for a special permit pursuant to Section 81-066(b) (“Special permit modifications of Section 81-254, Section 81-40, and certain Sections of Article VII, Chapter 7”) and 81-254 (“Special permit for height and setback modifications”) was filed by 401 Hotel REIT, LLC, and 401 Commercial, L.P. on August 5, 2009, to facilitate the development of a commercial office building of approximately 2 million zoning square feet on the western half of the block bounded by West 33rd Street, West 32nd Street, Seventh Avenue, and Sixth Avenue.
    [Show full text]
  • Certified Nonprofits
    2017 CERTIFIED NONPROFITS 1957 • • 2017 Every Day. All Year. 2017 CERTIFIED NONPROFITS The following is a list of all the nonprofit organizations represented in the 2017 Our Promise campaign that are certified by the Department of Justice. WHAT'S INCLUDED IN EACH LISTING: When filling out your pledge Nonprofit Code # form, please use this nonprofit Nonprofit Name code in Step 3. Alternate Name (if any) Nonprofit name(s) TaxID# and general information. Mailing Address City, State, Zip You can click on any website to www.website.org access it directly from the PDF. If you do not see your nonprofit listed here, you may still give to them: simply provide their information in the write-in section of Step 3 on the pledge form. THANK YOU FOR CARING FOR CALIFORNIA! 10389 Old Placerville Road Sacramento, CA 95827 DONOR HOTLINE (888) 863-6466 www.OurPromiseCA.org 2 28880 24866 11761 A 10,000 Degrees A Community Of Friends ABS-CBN Foundation Inc. TaxID# 95-3667812 TaxID# 95-4203106 ABS-CBN Foundation International B 1650 Los Gamos Drive, Suite 110 3701 Wlshre Blvd Ste 700 TaxID# 94-3292281 San Rafael, CA 94903 Los Angeles, CA 90010 2001 Junipero Serra Blvd., 2nd Floor www.10000degrees.org www.acof.org Daly, CA 95126 C www.abscbnfoundation.org 13830 887 D 1736 Family Crisis Center A Place Called Home 25567 TaxID# 95-3989251 TaxID# 95-4427291 Abused Children's Fund, Inc. E 2116 Arlington Ave., Suite 200 2830 South Central Avenue TaxID# 59-3254371 Los Angeles, CA 90018 Los Angeles, CA 90011 1535 Farmers Lane, #200 www.1736fcc.org www.apch.org Santa Rosa, CA 95405 F www.abusedchildrensfund.org 17684 13507 G 2-1-1 Orange County A Safe Place 13439 TaxID# 33-0063532 TaxID# 94-2491881 Acacia Adult Day Services H 1505 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Cultural Resources in the Area of Potential Effect
    Appendix A Cultural Resources in the Area of Potential Effect Table A-1 Cultural Resources in the Area of Potential Effect Map S/NR- NYCL- Ref. # Name/Type Address S/NR NYCL eligible eligible 1 Hudson River Bulkhead Roughly between the Battery and X West 59th Street along the Hudson River waterfront 2 High Line Along 30th Street between Tenth and X Twelfth Avenues, and Twelfth Avenue between 30th and 34th Streets 3 W&J Sloane Warehouse and 306-310 Eleventh Avenue and 541- X Garage 561 West 29th Street 4 Charles P. Rodgers & Company 517-523 West 29th Street X Building 5 Farley Complex Block bounded by Eighth and Ninth X X Avenues and 31st and 33rd Streets 6 Loft Building 424 West 33rd Street X 7 St. Michael’s RC Church 414-424 West 34th Street and 409- X X Complex 429 West 33rd Street 8 Former Pinehill Crystal Water 500-504 West 36th Street X Company 9 William F. Sloan Memorial YMCA 360 West 34th Street X X 10 Former J.C. Penney Co. 331-343 West 33rd Street; 330 West X 34th Street 11 Loft Building 406-426 West 31st Street X 12 Tenement 463 West 35th Street X 13 Former Gledhill Wall Paper 541-545 West 34th Street; 546-548 X Company West 35th Street 14 West Side Jewish Center 347 West 34th Street X 15 Former Manhattan Opera House 311 West 34th Street X X 16 New Yorker Hotel 481-497 Eighth Avenue X X 17 Morgan General Mail Facility 341 Ninth Avenue X 18 Former French Hospital 326-330 West 30th Street X 19 Pennsylvania Building 225 West 34th Street X X 20 Hoover Building 501-507 Eighth Avenue X 21 Garment Center Historic District Roughly bounded
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Asset Management Review of Tall Residential Buildings Of
    Journal of Built Environment, Technology and Engineering, Vol. 3 (September) 2017 ISSN 0128-1003 ASSET MANAGEMENT REVIEW OF TALL RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS IN MAJOR CITIES: CHICAGO, HONG KONG AND SINGAPORE Raymond Cheng Email: [email protected] Reader, Industrial Doctorate (IndD) Programme, Asia e University, Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA Ivan Ng Email: [email protected] Executive Director, Russia Capital Investment Corporation Limited, HONG KONG ABSTRACT There is only one residential skyscraper within China’s top 100 tallest buildings in the crowded 24-million- population city of Shanghai, China (and eleven residential skyscrapers among the 134 tallest buildings, i.e. those taller than 150 metres), whereas there are comparatively a lot more skyscrapers used for residential purposes in equally densely populated cities like Hong Kong, Singapore, Kuala Lumpur and, of course, Chicago and New York. This paper, hence, looked, from a historical perspective, how the development of tall buildings in Chicago, Hong Kong and Singapore have evolved to become what we see today. How does the tall building development history of a city help forge the people’s view in terms of living in skyscrapers? Would such help provide explanations and hints as to the future development of skyscrapers in the other cities like Shanghai? Keywords: Tall building, skyscraper, high-rise, development history Learning from the American experience The mythical story of the Tower of Babel tells us that how height, in itself, since the beginning of known history, means power to human beings. But before Elisha Otis revolutionized and refined the safety of the elevator by inventing the elevator brakes1 in 1852, both the Greek mathematician Archimedes of Syracuse and King Louis XV of France could only have envisioned their great ideas through primitive, man-powered, inefficient mechanical lifting devices back in their days.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E: Historic and Cultural Resources
    Appendix E: Historic and Cultural Resources ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Project number: EMPIRE STATE DEVELOPMENT CORP / SEQRA-M Project: EMPIRE STATION DEVELOPMENT Date Received: 7/7/2020 ARCHAEOLOGY REVIEW ONLY. Properties with Archaeological significance: LPC review of archaeological sensitivity models and historic maps indicates that there is potential for the recovery of remains from 19th Century "Jews Cemetery" on the project site. Accordingly, the Commission recommends that an archaeological documentary study be performed for the bbl 1008087501 to clarify these initial findings and provide the threshold for the next level of review, if such review is necessary (see CEQR Technical Manual 2014). Properties with no Archaeological significance: LPC review of archaeological sensitivity models and historic maps indicates that there is potential for the recovery of remains from 19th Century "Jews Cemetery" on the project site. Accordingly, the Commission recommends that an archaeological documentary study be performed for the bbl 1008087501 to clarify these initial findings and provide the threshold for the next level of review, if such review is necessary (see CEQR Technical Manual 2014). There are no further archeological concerns for the following bbl: 1008080040, 1008090082, 1008090080, 1008090073, 1008090069, 1008090017, 1008090016, 1008090008, 1008090005, 1008090004, 1008090003, 1008090001, 1007830048, 1007830034, 1007830070, 1007830001, 1008060076, 1008060069, 1008060009, 1008060006, 1008060003, 1008060001, 1007800076, 1007800075, 1007800074, 1007800073, 1007800071, 1007800070, 1007800060, 1007800045, Page 1 of 2 1007800036, 1007800026, 1007800019, 1007800017, 1007800015, 1007800013, 1007800010, 1007800009, 1007800007, 1007800006, 1007800005, 1007800002, 1007800001, 1007540063, 1007540051, 1007540044, 1007540041, 1007540040, 1007540039, 1007540038, 1007540037, 1007540036, 1007540035, 1007540034. 7/28/2020 SIGNATURE DATE Gina Santucci, Environmental Review Coordinator File Name: 35043_FSO_DNP_07142020.docx Page 2 of 2 ANDREW M.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Memorandum Restrictive Declarations
    POST-RECORD OF DECISION (ROD) TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM RESTRICTIVE DECLARATIONS June 1, 2010 Revision 0 For: Submitted by: j (A joint venture of PB Americas, Inc., STV, Incorporated, and AECOM USA, Inc.) Restrictive Declarations Revisions REVISION HISTORY Revision Date Description: 0 June 1, 2010 Release to NJ TRANSIT and FTA NJT 06-046 10104 i 06-01-10 REV 0 Restrictive Declarations Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose of this Technical Memorandum......................................................... 1 1.2 General Description of the ARC Project.......................................................... 1 1.3 Environmental Reviews and Approvals to Date ............................................... 2 1.4 Project Alignment and the Project Protection Zone .......................................... 3 1.5 Definition of “Work” Covered by the Restrictive Declaration.............................. 3 1.6 Project Protection Zone ................................................................................ 4 2 POTENTIALLY AFFECTED LocationS.................................................................... 5 2.1 Existing and Future Development Conditions.................................................. 5 3 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ............................................................................... 8 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Project Protection Zone ...............................................................................................11
    [Show full text]