DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 9: Architectural Historic Resources ......................................................9-1 A. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................9-1 B. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS ..............................................................................................9-1 C. METHODOLOGY.................................................................................................................9-2 1. OVERVIEW ..........................................................................................................................9-2 2. AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECT (APE) ..................................................................................9-3 3. CRITERIA AND REGULATIONS ............................................................................................9-3 D. EXISTING CONDITIONS ....................................................................................................9-4 1. BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................9-4 2. DESIGNATED AND ELIGIBLE ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES ..............................................9-5 a) Individually Designated, Listed, or Eligible Resources............................................................... 9-9 b) Garment Industry Resources.......................................................................................................9-22 c) Printing Industry Resources........................................................................................................9-32 d) Hell’s Kitchen Residential Resources.........................................................................................9-36 e) Hell’s Kitchen Institutional Resources .......................................................................................9-42 f) Hell’s Kitchen Industrial Resources ...........................................................................................9-47 g) Hell’s Kitchen Commercial Resources.......................................................................................9-49 h) Chelsea Industrial Resources......................................................................................................9-50 i) Commercial Resources Near Penn Station .................................................................................9-53 E. 2010 FUTURE WITHOUT THE PROPOSED ACTION....................................................9-56 F. 2010 FUTURE WITH THE PROPOSED ACTION............................................................9-59 1. DIRECT IMPACTS ..............................................................................................................9-59 a) Proposed Rezoning.....................................................................................................................9-59 b) Open Space.................................................................................................................................9-60 c) No. 7 Subway Extension ............................................................................................................9-60 d) Convention Center, Multi-Use Facility, and Waterfront ............................................................9-62 e) Potential Accommodation for the NYPD Tow Pound and DSNY Facility ................................9-62 2. CONTEXTUAL IMPACTS ....................................................................................................9-62 a) New Development ......................................................................................................................9-63 b) Open Space.................................................................................................................................9-64 c) No. 7 Subway Extension ............................................................................................................9-65 d) Convention Center, Multi-Use Facility, and Waterfront ............................................................9-65 G. 2025 FUTURE WITHOUT THE PROPOSED ACTION....................................................9-65 H. 2025 FUTURE WITH THE PROPOSED ACTION............................................................9-66 1. DIRECT IMPACTS ..............................................................................................................9-66 a) New Development ......................................................................................................................9-66 b) Open Space.................................................................................................................................9-70 2. CONTEXTUAL IMPACTS ....................................................................................................9-71 a) New Development ......................................................................................................................9-71 b) Open Space.................................................................................................................................9-74 I. MITIGATION......................................................................................................................9-74 1. DIRECT IMPACTS ..............................................................................................................9-74 a) Possible Mitigation Measures for Demolition or Alteration of Architectural Resources ...........9-74 b) Possible Mitigation for Accidental Damage from Adjacent Construction .................................9-75 9-i No. 7 Subway Extension—Hudson Yards Rezoning and Development Program FGEIS LIST OF TABLES TABLE 9-1 DESIGNATED AND ELIGIBLE ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES WITHIN THE PROJECT STUDY AREA .. 9-5 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 9-1 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: NORTH OF WEST 36TH STREET FIGURE 9-2 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: SOUTH OF WEST 36TH STREET FIGURE 9-3 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-4 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-5 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-6 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-7 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-8 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-9 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-10 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-11 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-12 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-13 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-14 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-15 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-16 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-17 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-18 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-19 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-20 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: THE HIGH LINE FIGURE 9-21 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: THE HIGH LINE FIGURE 9-22 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: THE HIGH LINE FIGURE 9-23 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: THE HIGH LINE FIGURE 9-24 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: THE HIGH LINE FIGURE 9-25 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: GARMENT INDUSTRY RESOURCES FIGURE 9-26 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: GARMENT INDUSTRY RESOURCES FIGURE 9-27 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: GARMENT INDUSTRY RESOURCES FIGURE 9-28 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: GARMENT INDUSTRY RESOURCES FIGURE 9-29 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: GARMENT INDUSTRY RESOURCES FIGURE 9-30 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: GARMENT INDUSTRY RESOURCES FIGURE 9-31 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: GARMENT INDUSTRY RESOURCES FIGURE 9-32 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: GARMENT INDUSTRY RESOURCES FIGURE 9-33 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: GARMENT INDUSTRY RESOURCES FIGURE 9-34 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: GARMENT INDUSTRY RESOURCES FIGURE 9-35 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: GARMENT INDUSTRY RESOURCES FIGURE 9-36 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: GARMENT INDUSTRY RESOURCES FIGURE 9-37 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: GARMENT INDUSTRY RESOURCES FIGURE 9-38 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: GARMENT INDUSTRY RESOURCES FIGURE 9-39 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: PRINTING INDUSTRY RESOURCES FIGURE 9-40 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: PRINTING INDUSTRY RESOURCES FIGURE 9-41 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: PRINTING INDUSTRY RESOURCES FIGURE 9-42 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: PRINTING INDUSTRY RESOURCES FIGURE 9-43 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: PRINTING INDUSTRY RESOURCES FIGURE 9-44 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: HELL’S KITCHEN RESIDENTIAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-45 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: HELL’S KITCHEN RESIDENTIAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-46 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: HELL’S KITCHEN RESIDENTIAL RESOURCES 9-ii Chapter 9: Architectural Historic Resources FIGURE 9-47 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: HELL’S KITCHEN RESIDENTIAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-48 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: HELL’S KITCHEN RESIDENTIAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-49 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: HELL’S KITCHEN RESIDENTIAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-50 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: HELL’S KITCHEN RESIDENTIAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-51 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: HELL’S KITCHEN RESIDENTIAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-52 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: HELL’S KITCHEN RESIDENTIAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-53 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: HELL’S KITCHEN RESIDENTIAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-54 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: HELL’S KITCHEN RESIDENTIAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-55 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: HELL’S KITCHEN RESIDENTIAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-56 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: HELL’S KITCHEN RESIDENTIAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-57 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: HELL’S KITCHEN RESIDENTIAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-58 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: HELL’S KITCHEN RESIDENTIAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-59 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: HELL’S KITCHEN RESIDENTIAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-60 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: HELL’S KITCHEN RESIDENTIAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-61 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: HELL’S KITCHEN RESIDENTIAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-62 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: HELL’S KITCHEN RESIDENTIAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-63 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES: HELL’S KITCHEN RESIDENTIAL RESOURCES FIGURE 9-64 ARCHITECTURAL
Load more

Recommended publications
  • List of Registered Firms
    City University of New York Facilities Planning, Construction, and Management Design of Hostos Community College Allied Health and Natural Science Building Complex Project No.: HS-CUCF-04-13 List of Registered Firms Zip First Fax Firm Name Address: City: State: Code: Name: Last Name: Phone: Number Email: [email protected] 1100 Architect 475 10th Avenue New York New York 10018 AJ Zandt 2126451011 m [email protected] 1100 Architect 475 Tenth Avenue New York New York 10018 Victoria Naysmith 2126451011 om FREEPOR ANTHO 516.6329 vellissa@acbarchitectspll ACB ARCHITECTS PLLC 53 SOUTH MAIN STREET T NEW YORK 11520 NY BAKER 5166329744 748 c.com antoine.abidargham@ae AECOM 125 Broad St New York NY 10004 Antoine AbiDargham 2123778424 com.com 212 -354- AKF Engineers LLP 330 West 42nd Street, 14th Floor New York NY 10036 Jessica Ng 212-626-0155 5656 [email protected] 212-966- marketing@gaynordesig Alan Gaynor + Company 434 Broadway, 6th Floor New York New York 10013 Julie Geffke 212-334-0900 8652 n.com eyu@andrewbermanarch Andrew Berman Architect 77 Chambers St New York NY 10007 E Yu 2122265998 itect.com WOODSI 718.504.7 ARARCHITECT07@YAH AR ARCHITECT P.C. 58-26 ROOSEVELT AVE DE NY 11377 ANGEL ROJAS 718.565.5395 916 OO.COM 212-581- [email protected] Armand LeGardeur Architect LLC 7 West 22nd Street, 3rd Floor New York NY 10010 Armand LeGardeur 212-581-2877 1976 m Arup 77 Water Street New York New York 10005 Callie Key 6155871492 [email protected] Atelier Architecture 64 340 Sackett Street Brooklyn NY 11231 Phillip Anzalone 718-624-2078
    [Show full text]
  • HVAC, ACCESS and LIGHTING CONTROLS FACT SHEET
    HVAC, ACCESS and LIGHTING CONTROLS Established 1985 FACT SHEET PECONIC ENERGY PRODUCTS CORPORATION (“PEPCO™”) reduces energy usage of Gas, Oil, Electric and Steam in multi-family residential, commercial and industrial facilities etc... by regulating, monitoring and controlling building mechanical and electrical systems (Boilers, Pumps, Fans, Chillers, AHU’s, RTU’s, FCU’s and Lighting) via Computerized Building and Energy Automation Systems powered by DELTA CONTROLS www.deltacontrols.com. PEPCO™ products include the following: 1. Custom Control Systems ( H.V.A.C, Lighting, Access Control Systems) 2. ENERGUARD™ - Large Building Wireless HEAT COMPUTER (Prices starting at $12,000) 3. HEAT-MASTER™ - Small Building Wireless HEAT COMPUTER (Prices starting $7,500) 4. HEAT-CON™ - Residential or Small Building HEAT COMPUTER (Prices starting at $2,900) 5. FUEL TANK LEVEL MONITORING (FTM) - Reports Fuel Deliveries And Oil Tank Level. 6. BACnet Network Ready Wall Thermostats 7. Wireless Control System PEPCO is a CON-ED Market Partner ( http://www.conedci.com/MPAwards.aspx ). As a Market Partner prospective PEPCO customers can receive up to 70% rebate toward the purchase price of a PEPCO system. Since 2010 PEPCO customers have received over $2,600,000 in Utility Rebates. • Reduce building energy usage and operating costs by up to 50% • Monitor and Control a single building or a portfolio of properties via IPAD, Cell Phone, Laptop or PC. • Utility Rebates of up to 70% of purchase price with Return On Investment in 2 years or less • Demand Response and Permanent Load Curtailment • Easily expandable to include Card Access, Lighting Controls, CCTV, Electric and Water Metering/Sub-Metering • Provide more comfortable tempered environments for tenants PEPCO™ offers 24/7/365 remote monitoring of facilities from our Deer Park facility.
    [Show full text]
  • SENTENCE LORENZ; FAMOUSCOACH Florida’S Unwelcome Guest—Capone PRESIDENT ADVISES SAYSDRYLAW DIES on GALLOWS CALLMUTIA ISU a Lld R E DISPUTE AUGUST 12Th
    ; -T ^ WEATHER T : J n e t p r e s s r u n rorepact by W««t^jr Bm u. AVERAGE DAILY CIRCULATION Hartford. for the Month of March, 1930 \ Partiy Oiottdy .and pqnt|atied opM tonight; Friday fair. 5,511 , '■ Blenibera of the Audit Dareaa of Clrcnlnttons PRICE THREE CENTS SOUTH MANCHESTER, CONN., THURSDAY, APRIL 24, 1930. FOURTEEN‘ PAGES VOL. XLIV., NO. 175. '(Claimed Adverttslng on Page 13) SENTENCE LORENZ; FAMOUSCOACH Florida’s Unwelcome Guest—Capone PRESIDENT ADVISES SAYSDRYLAW DIES ON GALLOWS CALLMUTIA ISU A llD R E DISPUTE AUGUST 12th. Bill Roper Declares Threaten to Kill Score of WARSHIP CAPTAIN |(j|gf Executive Takes Hai^ I Secret Drinking Makes Guards If Not Released Hartford Youth Who Killed DAUGHTER OF DUCE COMMITS SUICIDE . > ^ ^ I Parents Fearful of Send- from Cage; IVouble Final­ In Controversy at White His Friend Found Guilty of IS MARRIED TODAY H ^gs Hiii)self in , His Cabin House Breakfast; Snti^ I ing Children to College. ly Averted. Just -teore British Crjaiser Murder in First Degree; S ta ^ for target Practice. BULLETIN With Senator Watson That Washington, April 24.— (A P .)— Portsmough, Eng., April 24.— His Statement at the Trial Miss Edda Mussolini Be­ Testimony that prohibition has fail­ (A P )—Tragedy came to the Columbus, Ohio, April 24.— British.cruiser Champion lying ed to prohibit in American colleges Lower Branch Should Act (A P )—Attorney General Gil­ at her berth here today. comes Wife of Count Ci- and neighborhood settlements, and Hartford, April 24.—(AP) — bert Gettman left Ohio. Peni­ The eraser was to have gone that Ontario province across the out on firing practice during the First— To Take Dp Mat­ Henry O.
    [Show full text]
  • Borough Hall Skyscraper Historic District Designation Report
    Cover Photograph: Court Street looking south along Skyscraper Row towards Brooklyn City Hall, now Brooklyn Borough Hall (1845-48, Gamaliel King) and the Brooklyn Municipal Building (1923-26, McKenzie, Voorhees & Gmelin). Christopher D. Brazee, 2011 Borough Hall Skyscraper Historic District Designation Report Prepared by Christopher D. Brazee Edited by Mary Beth Betts, Director of Research Photographs by Christopher D. Brazee Map by Jennifer L. Most Technical Assistance by Lauren Miller Commissioners Robert B. Tierney, Chair Pablo E. Vengoechea, Vice-Chair Frederick Bland Christopher Moore Diana Chapin Margery Perlmutter Michael Devonshire Elizabeth Ryan Joan Gerner Roberta Washington Michael Goldblum Kate Daly, Executive Director Mark Silberman, Counsel Sarah Carroll, Director of Preservation TABLE OF CONTENTS BOROUGH HALL SKYSCRAPER HISTORIC DISTRICT MAP ................... FACING PAGE 1 TESTIMONY AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ................................................................................ 1 BOROUGH HALL SKYSCRAPER HISTORIC DISTRICT BOUNDARIES ............................. 1 SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 3 THE HISTORICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BOROUGH HALL SKYSCRAPER HISTORIC DISTRICT ........................................................................................ 5 Early History and Development of Brooklyn‟s Civic Center ................................................... 5 Mid 19th Century Development
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinknyc+2020-08-20A.Pdf
    ReThinkNYC Requests that ReThinkNYC Proposals be Treated as Alternatives to be Studied ReThinkNYC • New York, NY • August,20 2020 Reimagined Penn Station’s Main Hall. Digital Rendering by NOVA Concepts. “The Pennsylvania Station in New York is like some vast basilica of old that towers above the terror of the dark as bulwark and protection to the soul.” Langston Hughes 1. Introduction: ReThinkNYC Requests that ReThinkNYC Proposals be Treated as Alternatives to be Studied 7th Avenue Facade rendering by Jeff Stikeman RethinkNYC submits the following supplemental statement and proposals to their July 20, 2020 preliminary written and verbal submissions which were made in response to the Empire State Development Corps Draft Scope of Work (“DSOW”) and request for Public Comment. RethinkNYC asks that this supplementary submission, which incorporates and adds to the prior submissions(with any changes noted), be read as a unified document. RethinkNYC requests that the proposals submitted today be considered as an “alternative(s) to be studied” as set forth on page 53 of the DSOW. While RethinkNYC’s more specific criticism’s are set forth immediately below, RethinkNYC’s overarching criticism and reason for sponsoring alternatives is that the proposed Empire State Complex fails to sufficiently unlock the potential that a modernized Penn Station and transit network would have on the economy, the region and nation’s ecology, aesthetics, fair housing and accessability to the job market, among many other advantages. While the DSOW acknowledges other infrastructure projects — Gateway, Sunnyside Yards and the Port Authority Bus Terminal — it does not coordinate or harmonize these proposals in a way that maximizes their impacts for the region.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Bankruptcy Court Northern District of New York
    Case 19-12215-1-rel Doc 311 Filed 01/04/21 Entered 01/04/21 14:12:54 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE GOOD SAMARITAN LUTHERAN HEALTH Case No. 19-12215-1-rel CARE CENTER, INC., d/b/a BETHLEHEM Chapter 11 (Main Case) COMMONS CARE CENTER, et al. Case No. 19-12216-1-rel Debtor. I hereby certify that on January 4, 2021, I electronically filed a THIRD INTERIM FEE APPLICATION OF PATIENT CARE OMBUDSMAN, NOTICE OF HEARING ON THIRD INTERIM FEE APPLICATION OF PATIENT CARE OMBUDSMAN, THIRD AND FINAL INTERIM FEE APPLICATION OF NOLAN HELLER KAUFFMAN LLP, AS ATTORNEYS FOR PATIENT CARE OMBUDSMAN, and NOTICE OF HEARING ON THIRD AND FINAL INTERIM FEE APPLICATION OF NOLAN HELLER KAUFFMAN LLP, AS ATTORNEYS FOR PATIENT CARE OMBUDSMAN with the Clerk of Bankruptcy Court using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of such filing to the following: Ryan James Barbur, Esq.: William F. Berglund, Esq.: Francis J. Brennan, Esq.; Kelly Deeanne Curtin, Esq.; Amy J. Ginsberg, Esq.; Suzanne Hepner, Esq.; E. Stewart Jones, Esq.; John S. Mairo, Esq.; Christopher P. Mazza, Esq.; Lisa M Penpraze, Esq.; Daniel M. Pereira, Esq.; Deborah Reperowitz, Esq.; Louis Testa, Esq. and U.S. Trustee And, I also hereby certify that on January 4, 2021 I have mailed the SAME by the United States Postal Service to the following non-CM/ECF Participants hereunder: SEE ATTACHED MAILING MATRIX s/ Penelope D. Munafo _____________________________________ PENELOPE D. MUNAFO NH2020-2106082335-756465 Case 19-12215-1-rel
    [Show full text]
  • 25Th Street Showrooms Showrooms Throughout
    40°49'0"N 73°58'0"W 73°57'0"W 40°48'0"N 73°56'0"W 73°55'0"W E 119th St E 119th St e W 119th St e W 119th St W 119th St v v A A Central Harlem e e v v e St Nicholas Ave m A e d a A E 118th St i E 118th St v W 118th St d s W 118th St h t r Columbia n A g e e a 5 t t v t n t s i n Barnard r A n a m o 40°49'0"N University r e D h x E 117th St E 117th St A o m v W 117th St College n o e e A a n r M d i 3rd Ave 3rd e a h M s l L t g C 8 n E 116th St W 116th St i W 116th St W 116th St E 116th St n r o M W 115th St W 115th St W 115th St E 115th St E 115th St d v l e e Riverside Dr v e B v East Harlem v A r A E 114th St J W 114th St A W 114th St n Pleasant Ave l n o l t k o e r s North g i n Morningside a w i d P E 113th St x a W 113th St W 113th St o e e Park e P v L M Jefferson v 5th Ave e A n v A e iver x o e A v t t E 112th St E 112th St o W 112th St W 112th St s A W 112th St y g n Park n R 1 a a e d t l St Nicholas Ave m L i t r a a C d B h Manhattan r Frawley Cir E 111th St W 111th St W 111th St E 111th St W 111th St n m e Fred Douglass Cir t a s a Psychiatric h M d m g Riverside Dr u A A Central Park N E 110th St ral Pky W 110th St E 110th St m Cathed Center o r o e Wards Is Rd o le b v b E 109th St A E 109th St 21 C W 109th St W 109th St i st Dr r o n 40°47'0"N 73°59'0"W T o ar k Harlem Meer s i r d E 108th St E 108th St Ditmars Blvd West 108th St W 108th St W 108th St a H o n C M W End Ave Y e West Dr Co 107th St Dr R D F g E nrail Railroad Riverside Park W 107th St W 107th St E 107th St r w Broadway e East Dr v e Randalls-Wards W A Be
    [Show full text]
  • STARRETT-LEHIGH BUILDING, 601-625 West 26Th Street, Borough of Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission October 7, 1986; Designation List 186 LP-1295 STARRETT-LEHIGH BUILDING, 601-625 west 26th Street, Borough of Manhattan. Built 1930-31; Russell G. and Walter M. Cory, architects; Yasuo Matsui, associate architect; Purdy & Henderson, consulting engineers. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 672, Lot 1. On April 13, 1982, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Starrett-Lehigh Building, and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 20). The hearing was continued to June 8, 1982 (Item No. 3). Both hearings had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Four witnesses spoke in favor of designation, and a letter supporting designation was read into the record. Two representatives of the owner spoke at the hearings and took no position regarding the proposed designation. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS The Starrett-Lehigh Building, constructed in 1930-31 by architects Russell G. and walter M. Cory with Yasuo Matsui as associate architect and Purdy & Henderson as consulting engineers, is an enormous warehouse building that occupies the entire block bounded by West 26th and 27th Streets and 11th and 12th Avenues. A cooperative venture of the Starrett Investing Corporation and the Lehigh Valley Railroad, and built by Starrett Brothers & Eken, the structure served originally as a freight terminal for the railroad with rental manufacturing and warehouse space above. A structurally complex feat of engineering with an innovative interior arrangement, the Starrett-Lehigh Building is also notable for its exterior design of horizontal ribbon windows alternating with brick and concrete spandrels.
    [Show full text]
  • Meatpacking District • Nyc
    MEATPACKING DISTRICT • NYC CONCEPTUAL RENDERING BE A PART OF ONE OF THE HOTTEST, DYNAMIC NEW YORK NEIGHBORHOODS BOASTING HIGH-END FASHION RETAILERS, TRENDY RESTAURANTS, HOTELS AND NIGHTSPOTS THAT LINE THE COBBLESTONE STREETS OF THE MEATPACKING DISTRICT. space SPECIFICATIONS SIZE SPACE A Ground Floor 3,500 SF Basement 1,800 SF SPACE B SPACE A SPACE B Ground Floor 4,000 SF 3,500 sf 4,000 sf Basement 1,900 SF SITE STATUS SPACE A Vacant SPACE B Formerly Boardriders GROUND FLOOR GROUND 20 FT 35 FT CEILING HEIGHTS WEST 14TH STREET Ground Floor 14 FT TERM Long term POSSESSION Immediate COMMENTS Amazing branding opportunity in the heart of the Meatpacking District SPACE A SPACE B Located directly across from Apple 1,800 sf 1,900 sf NEIGHBORS Apple, Alice and Olivia, Patagonia, Asics, Kiehl’s, lululemon athletica, Hugo Boss, Joie, Levi’s, Samsung, Sorel, Columbia Sportswear and The Kooples BASEMENT BASEMENT 6.5 MILLION ANNUAL VISITORS TO CHELSEA MARKET 13.9 MILLION ANNUAL RIDERSHIP AT 14TH STREET SUBWAY STATION 1,742 HOTEL ROOMS 300,000 ANNUAL VISITORS ANTICIPATED TO WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART 4.4 MILLION SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE SPACE IN THE MPD SUBMARKET 5 MILLION ANNUAL VISITORS TO NEARBY HIGH LINE WEST 17TH STREET Comme des Garçons Number 8 WEST 16TH STREET CHELSEA MARKET Amy’s Bread People’s Pops Manhattan Fruit Exchange Buon Italia The Lobster Place The Filling Station The Nutbox Ronnybrook Dairy Bowery Kitchen Supply Giovanni Rana Pastificio & Cucina Bar Suzette The Green Table Chelsea Market Baskets Sarabeth’s Posman Books The Cleaver Co.
    [Show full text]
  • DIRECTIONS by SUBWAY: F Train to East Broadway Take Rutgers St./Madison St
    DIRECTIONS BY SUBWAY: F Train to East Broadway Take Rutgers St./Madison St. exit from station - Exit Walk east on Rutgers Street towards the water. Turn left on South Street heading north. Once you approach the Dept of Sanitation (on your right), Pier 36 is adjacent on the north side of Sanitation. DIRECTIONS BY CAR: From FDR Drive - Southbound: FDR Drive South to Exit 3, towards South St/Manhattan Bridge. Stay straight to go onto FDR Drive. FDR Drive becomes South Street. Pier 36 is located at the intersection of South Street and Montgomery Street From FDR Drive - Northbound: South Street north (under the FDR highway), past the South Street Seaport (do not go on the FDR Drive). Continue north on South Street (under the Manhattan Bridge, Pathmark on your left), until you see the Department of Sanitation on your right. At the next intersection (South Street and Montgomery Street), turn right at the light for Pier 36. (the entrance for the FDR north will be directly in front of you at the light). From New Jersey Turnpike: Proceed to Exit 14C (Holland Tunnel) Go through the Holland Tunnel and Take EXIT 5 on the left toward Canal St East. Turn slight right onto Laight St...Turn slight right onto Canal St... Turn right onto Bowery. Bowery becomes Chatham Sq. Turn left onto E Broadway...Turn right onto Samuel Dickstein Plz... Turn slight left onto Montgomery St. Turn right onto South St. and end at Pier 36, located at the intersection of South Street and Montgomery Street From the George Washington Bridge: After leaving GW Bridge, take Harlem River Drive exit, Exit 2, towards FDR Drive Proceed onto the Harlem River Drive which connects/merges into FDR Drive S.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the 2019 Map & Guide
    ARCHITECTURAL AND CULTURAL Map &Guide FRIENDS of the Upper East Side Historic Districts Architectural and Cultural Map and Guide Founded in 1982, FRIENDS of the Upper East Side Historic Districts is an independent, not-for-profit membership organization dedicated to preserving the architectural legacy, livability, and sense of place of the Upper East Side by monitoring and protecting its seven Historic Districts, 131 Individual Landmarks, and myriad significant buildings. Walk with FRIENDS as we tour some of the cultural and architectural sites that make the Upper East Side such a distinctive place. From elegant apartment houses and mansions to more modest brownstones and early 20th-century immigrant communities, the Upper East Side boasts a rich history and a wonderfully varied built legacy. With this guide in hand, immerse yourself in the history and architecture of this special corner of New York City. We hope you become just as enchanted by it as we are. FRIENDS’ illustrated Architectural and Cultural Map and Guide includes a full listing of all of the Upper East Side’s 131 Individual Landmarks. You can find the location of these architectural gems by going to the map on pages 2-3 of the guide and referring to the numbered green squares. In the second section of the guide, we will take you through the history and development of the Upper East Side’s seven Historic Districts, and the not landmarked, though culturally and architecturally significant neighborhood of Yorkville. FRIENDS has selected representative sites that we feel exemplify each district’s unique history and character. Each of the districts has its own color-coded map with easy-to-read points that can be used to find your own favorite site, or as a self-guided walking tour the next time you find yourself out strolling on the Upper East Side.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Rail Yard
    Chapter 10: Neighborhood Character A. INTRODUCTION Neighborhood character is an amalgam of several elements that give an area its distinctive personality and help distinguish it from other neighborhoods. These components include: land use; street layout; scale, type, and style of development; historic features; patterns and volumes of traffic; noise levels; and any other physical or social characteristics. However, not all of these elements affect neighborhood character in all cases; a neighborhood usually draws its character from a few determining elements. Using information presented in other technical chapters of this EIS, this chapter examines neighborhood character at the three project sites and the associated surrounding study areas, and analyzes the effects of the Proposed Actions on neighborhood character in these areas. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS The Proposed Actions would have a beneficial effect on neighborhood character on the project sites and in the surrounding study areas. Development of Western Rail Yard would fulfill a long- standing public policy to promote productive use of the site with a lively mix of uses, open spaces, and streets that would complement and support the development in the Hudson Yards area and West Chelsea. Construction of permanently affordable housing on the Tenth Avenue and Ninth Avenue Sites would support the Clinton neighborhood by emphasizing its residential character and the mixed-income character of its residents. DEVELOPMENT SITE The Proposed Actions would change the character of the Development Site, and this change would be, on balance, decidedly beneficial. The site, which presents a blank wall to the surrounding neighborhood on two sides and transportation/maintenance uses where it can be seen, would be transformed with a mix of residential and commercial uses and open spaces, clearly visible and accessible to the public.
    [Show full text]