DOCSLIB.ORG

Pylos Regional Archaeological Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pylos Regional Archaeological Project HESPERIA 74 (2005) PYLOS REGIONAL Pages 147-209 ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROJECT, PART VII Historical Messenia, Geometric through Late Roman abstract In this article, the authors explore patterns in regional activity inMessenia, corner the southwest of the Greek P?loponn?se, from the Geometric to the cen end of the Late Roman period (ca. eighth century b.c. to seventh on tury A.D.). The analysis is based extant historical evidence, the campaigns of the Minnesota Messenia Expedition, and?above all?the results of the Pylos Regional Archaeological Project. These three data sets have been inte as far as in order to trace in the grated, possible, long-term changes region a and to provide foundation for further work in this still underexplored por s tion of Greece historical landscape. a a Messenia possesses varied and fertile topography, unique and check a ered history, and rich, if increasingly threatened, archaeological heritage. The region today is perhaps most celebrated, by scholars and tourists alike, for its Bronze Age remains: the Palace of Nestor and its Linear B archive, the tholos tombs of Peristeria and Nichoria (Fig. 1). But the centuries after the end of the Mycenaean palaces also pose interesting problems for the archaeology of Messenia. on assess The principal emphasis in the present study is presenting and to ing the contributions made the long-term history of Messenia by the work of the Pylos Regional Archaeological Project (PRAP).1 The goals, methodologies, personnel, and preliminary results of PRAP have been reviewed elsewhere, but two essential aspects of the project will be restated area a zone briefly here.2 First, the study comprised large (encompassing 1. This was as assistance study undertaken part support, and the received Stephen Hodkinson, Nino Luraghi, from other see Davis and for mate of the Pylos Regional Archaeological organizations, Graham Shipley sharing and as such owes thanks to all et al. 488. We also thank was Project, 1997, p. rial unpublished when this report the that have Robertson for her usual to organizations supported Rosemary written, and the project's codirectors that endeavor. for excellent work on and for comments on the Major funding illustrations; manuscript. Na Patrick 2. For PRAP has been provided by the Jennifer Gates, Livingood, project methodologies and tional Endowment for the Solemeto for et Humanities, and?especially?Julie results, see, especially, Davis al. 1997; et the National Geographic Society, and assistance with GIS analyses and data Zangger al. 1997; Davis 1998c. See the Institute for to Aegean Prehistory. management. We would like express also Bennet, Davis, and Zarinebaf For details of our to those institutions' gratitude Richard Catling, Shahr 2000; Lee 2001. ? The American School of Classical Studies at Athens American School of Classical Studies at Athens is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve, and extend access to Hesperia ® www.jstor.org 148 SUSAN E. ALCOCK ET AL. Figure 1.Map ofMessenia, showing the principal places mentioned in the text. R. J. Robertson ca. some 250 km2) roughly centered around the Palace of Nestor, of which were 40 km2 intensively surveyed, including the Englianos ridge (the site of the Palace of Nestor), coastal areas north of the Bay of Navarino, and was to valleys east of the Adgaleon range (Fig. 2). Second, PRAP designed consider all periods of the past in their changing environmental settings. on monuments no means Although work post-prehistoric sites and is by unknown inMessenia, the investigations conducted by PRAP allow, for an a on a the first time, analysis of lengthy historical time span the basis of rigorously explored sample of the landscape. It could be ruefully argued that the study of the historical past of Messenia in particular requires such archaeological contributions. While can few parts of Greece boast the documentary richness of detail available for Athens and Sparta, Messenias peculiar historical trajectory leaves it to most especially vulnerable misunderstanding and neglect. The well known "fact" about the region, of course, is its unprecedented domina as tion by Sparta inArchaic and Classical times. External observers, such us Plato and Xenophon, tell something of the fate of Messenia and many of its inhabitants, the famed helots of antiquity. It is difficult, however, to overstate the limitations and biases of these sources, and the complete HISTORICAL MESSENIA 149 flit I \ M03_ jmmmJ^s^" Mouzaki Mt Airtat&nn I n'^'vieT ^ Metamorfosi) \ Vlasis |L^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^J ^^^^^A. K\(Y7^/ ? r^^Hora Settlement j o ,?k ^j0tfK???^ ?-'wL r~^X ^~X>Stenosia //^:::=:-^/Handrinou \ Figure 2. Region investigated by lack of independent Messenian testimony from this time period must be PRAP. Areas intensively surveyed Those who lived in the have become, in the famous and sites defined, 1991-1995. appreciated. region a without After liberation in 370/69 b.c. R. J. Robertson phrase, "people history."3 by Epaminondas and his alliance of anti-Spartan states, the Messenians be come an "visible" again, in outburst of civic foundation and monumental area? display?most famously atMessene, northeast of the PRAP study even and through the crafting and promulgation of local histories.4 But a the freed Messenia, minor player in the tangled world of Hellenistic never a politics, has attracted great deal of scholarly attention, and the same is true of Roman Messenia, part of the Roman empire along with the rest of Greece. to seen 3.Wolf 1982. In the minds of many Greeks had really begun inquire into in the results of excavations in the the own and at exam historians, domination by Sparta their past" (Lazenby Hope Asklepieion Messene; see, for to s see amounted the "loss" of Messenia Simpson 1972, p. 81); also Pearson ple, Alcock 2002a, pp. 164-173, and history: "In effect, Messenia had ceased 1962; cf.Alcock 1999. further discussion in this article, below. to a own 4. is have history of her before the The monumental display best i5o SUSAN E. ALCOCK ET AL Pylos / 11 Koryfasion? PRifUPfcgGION and areas walked IONIAN SEA ! Methoni Figure 3.Map indicating the survey territories of UMME (with subre gions indicated), the Five Rivers survey, and PRAP. R. J. Robertson can an as What intensive regional analysis, such PRAP's, offer to the are study of this unusual region? We in the strongest position to address not questions typically posed inMessenian historical scholarship, revolv as ing they do around life "on the ground" and not as viewed from an was external perspective. For example: What the nature of settlement and, by inference, of social organization and community structure in the re gion? How did alterations in political and administrative regimes affect where and how people lived?What economic change can be detected in the can to region, and how it be related the shifting political history? What contact are types of external visible in the regions material culture and what impact might such exchange have had upon local organization? What evidence emerges for ritual practice in this landscape? And how isMessenia or like, unlike, other parts of the Greek peninsula? answers to were The beginnings of these questions advanced by the University ofMinnesota Messenia Expedition (UMME).This multistage, an multidisciplinary project published, in 1972, the results of extensive surface of a to west exploration very large area, bounded the and south by to east the sea, the by the Taygetus Mountains, and to the north by the an area ca. Alpheios valley andTriphylia?in all, of 3,800 km2 (Fig. 3).5 In later stages, the project moved on to excavation and more localized survey at the site of Nichoria and its hinterland (the Five Rivers survey). Re were a gional data presented and analyzed in fashion admirable for its day, 5.McDonald and Rapp 1972. HISTORICAL messenia ?51 ar and the project has proved highly influential in the field of classical were chaeology.6 Survey directors honest, however, about their ability to our deal with the historical periods: "the focus of this study and of earlier on publications has been consistently the earlier material"; "our surface concen search and the general emphasis throughout this book has been on trated the Bronze Age."7 Moreover, UMME's extensive methods of reconnaissance left room to wonder whether the full spectrum of human to activity in the region?from major settlements small and isolated rural structures?could possibly have been observed.8 an a Perceiving PRAP as both "heir" to and as further stage in the a more work begun by UMME, PRAP investigators chose to follow in to tensive field methodology, and involve several ceramicists specializing to reassess in historical material, in order counter these problems and to cut UMME results. Potential benefits both ways, of course; compared with a more the wide-ranging earlier project, PRAP examined far restricted some territory, its intensively explored 40 km2 comprising only 1 percent of UMME's 3,800 km2 (see Fig. 3). Both investigations have something, if not same to as as the thing, offer, and throughout this report, far possible, UMME and PRAP results will be compared and integrated. we Before proceeding, should raise two important caveats about the present study. First, it should be admitted that knowledge of historical Messenian ceramic material?as with surface our always survey, principal source of evidence?remains limited, a circumstance due in part to the relative paucity of relevant excavated sites. Exacerbating this predicament, our were many of finds in poor condition, making identification difficult despite the best efforts of project ceramicists. Pieces that could be dated no more to or precisely than the "historical" phase, that remained simply our more "unknown," made up, in all, nearly 30 percent of than 20,000 or catalogued ceramic finds.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics
    Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics The eighth-century revolution Version 1.0 December 2005 Ian Morris Stanford University Abstract: Through most of the 20th century classicists saw the 8th century BC as a period of major changes, which they characterized as “revolutionary,” but in the 1990s critics proposed more gradualist interpretations. In this paper I argue that while 30 years of fieldwork and new analyses inevitably require us to modify the framework established by Snodgrass in the 1970s (a profound social and economic depression in the Aegean c. 1100-800 BC; major population growth in the 8th century; social and cultural transformations that established the parameters of classical society), it nevertheless remains the most convincing interpretation of the evidence, and that the idea of an 8th-century revolution remains useful © Ian Morris. [email protected] 1 THE EIGHTH-CENTURY REVOLUTION Ian Morris Introduction In the eighth century BC the communities of central Aegean Greece (see figure 1) and their colonies overseas laid the foundations of the economic, social, and cultural framework that constrained and enabled Greek achievements for the next five hundred years. Rapid population growth promoted warfare, trade, and political centralization all around the Mediterranean. In most regions, the outcome was a concentration of power in the hands of kings, but Aegean Greeks created a new form of identity, the equal male citizen, living freely within a small polis. This vision of the good society was intensely contested throughout the late eighth century, but by the end of the archaic period it had defeated all rival models in the central Aegean, and was spreading through other Greek communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    Index Note: page numbers in italics denote tables, maps, or illustrations Abdera 74 Cleomenes 237 ; coins 159, 276 , Abu Simbel 297 277, 279 ; food production 121, 268, Abydos 286 272 ; imports 268 ; Kleoitas 109 ; Achaea/Achaeans: Aigialos 213 ; Naucratis 269–271 ; pottery 191 ; basileus 128, 129, 134 ; Sparta 285 ; trade 268, 272 colonization 100, 104, 105, 107–108, Aegium 88, 91, 108 115, 121 ; democracy 204 ; Aelian 4, 186, 188 dialect 44 ; ethnos 91 ; Aeneas 109, 129 Herodotus 91 ; heroes 73, 108 ; Aeolians 45 , 96–97, 122, 292, 307 ; Homer 52, 172, 197, 215 ; dialect group 44, 45, 46 Ionians 50 ; migration 44, 45 , 50, Aeschines 86, 91, 313, 314–315 96 ; pottery 119 ; as province 68 ; Aeschylus: Persians 287, 308 ; Seven relocation 48 ; warrior tombs 49 Against Thebes 162 ; Suppliant Achilles 128, 129, 132, 137, 172, 181, Maidens 204 216 ; shield of 24, 73, 76, 138–139 Aetolia/Aetolians 20 ; dialect 299 ; Acrae 38 , 103, 110 Erxadieis 285 ; ethnos 91, 92 ; Acraephnium 279 poleis 93 ; pottery 50 ; West Acragas 38 , 47 ; democracy 204 ; Locris 20 foundation COPYRIGHTED 104, 197 ; Phalaris 144 ; Aëtos MATERIAL 62 Theron 149, 289 ; tyranny 150 Africanus, Sextus Julius 31 Adrastus 162 Agamemnon: Aeolians 97 ; anax 129 ; Aegimius 50, 51 Argos 182 ; armor 173 ; Aegina 3 ; Argos 3, 5 ; Athens 183, basileus 128, 129 ; scepter 133 ; 286, 287 ; captured 155 ; Schliemann 41 ; Thersites 206 A History of the Archaic Greek World: ca. 1200–479 BCE, Second Edition. Jonathan M. Hall. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2014 by John Wiley & Sons,
    [Show full text]
  • Genetics of the Peloponnesean Populations and the Theory of Extinction of the Medieval Peloponnesean Greeks
    European Journal of Human Genetics (2017) 25, 637–645 Official journal of The European Society of Human Genetics www.nature.com/ejhg ARTICLE Genetics of the peloponnesean populations and the theory of extinction of the medieval peloponnesean Greeks George Stamatoyannopoulos*,1, Aritra Bose2, Athanasios Teodosiadis3, Fotis Tsetsos2, Anna Plantinga4, Nikoletta Psatha5, Nikos Zogas6, Evangelia Yannaki6, Pierre Zalloua7, Kenneth K Kidd8, Brian L Browning4,9, John Stamatoyannopoulos3,10, Peristera Paschou11 and Petros Drineas2 Peloponnese has been one of the cradles of the Classical European civilization and an important contributor to the ancient European history. It has also been the subject of a controversy about the ancestry of its population. In a theory hotly debated by scholars for over 170 years, the German historian Jacob Philipp Fallmerayer proposed that the medieval Peloponneseans were totally extinguished by Slavic and Avar invaders and replaced by Slavic settlers during the 6th century CE. Here we use 2.5 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms to investigate the genetic structure of Peloponnesean populations in a sample of 241 individuals originating from all districts of the peninsula and to examine predictions of the theory of replacement of the medieval Peloponneseans by Slavs. We find considerable heterogeneity of Peloponnesean populations exemplified by genetically distinct subpopulations and by gene flow gradients within Peloponnese. By principal component analysis (PCA) and ADMIXTURE analysis the Peloponneseans are clearly distinguishable from the populations of the Slavic homeland and are very similar to Sicilians and Italians. Using a novel method of quantitative analysis of ADMIXTURE output we find that the Slavic ancestry of Peloponnesean subpopulations ranges from 0.2 to 14.4%.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Mycenaean Arkadia: Space and Place(S) of an Inland and Mountainous Region
    Early Mycenaean Arkadia: Space and Place(s) of an Inland and Mountainous Region Eleni Salavoura1 Abstract: The concept of space is an abstract and sometimes a conventional term, but places – where people dwell, (inter)act and gain experiences – contribute decisively to the formation of the main characteristics and the identity of its residents. Arkadia, in the heart of the Peloponnese, is a landlocked country with small valleys and basins surrounded by high mountains, which, according to the ancient literature, offered to its inhabitants a hard and laborious life. Its rough terrain made Arkadia always a less attractive area for archaeological investigation. However, due to its position in the centre of the Peloponnese, Arkadia is an inevitable passage for anyone moving along or across the peninsula. The long life of small and medium-sized agrarian communities undoubtedly owes more to their foundation at crossroads connecting the inland with the Peloponnesian coast, than to their potential for economic growth based on the resources of the land. However, sites such as Analipsis, on its east-southeastern borders, the cemetery at Palaiokastro and the ash altar on Mount Lykaion, both in the southwest part of Arkadia, indicate that the area had a Bronze Age past, and raise many new questions. In this paper, I discuss the role of Arkadia in early Mycenaean times based on settlement patterns and excavation data, and I investigate the relation of these inland communities with high-ranking central places. In other words, this is an attempt to set place(s) into space, supporting the idea that the central region of the Peloponnese was a separated, but not isolated part of it, comprising regions that are also diversified among themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography
    Faculty of Literature and Philosophy Julie Boeten The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Abii-Ionians) With a case-study: the Cappadocians Master thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Linguistics and Literature, Greek and Latin. 2015 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Mark Janse UGent Department of Greek Linguistics Co-Promotores: Prof. Brian Joseph Ohio State University Dr. Christopher Brown Ohio State University ACKNOWLEDGMENT In this acknowledgment I would like to thank everybody who has in some way been a part of this master thesis. First and foremost I want to thank my promotor Prof. Janse for giving me the opportunity to write my thesis in the context of the Herodotos Project, and for giving me suggestions and answering my questions. I am also grateful to Prof. Joseph and Dr. Brown, who have given Anke and me the chance to be a part of the Herodotos Project and who have consented into being our co- promotores. On a whole other level I wish to express my thanks to my parents, without whom I would not have been able to study at all. They have also supported me throughout the writing process and have read parts of the draft. Finally, I would also like to thank Kenneth, for being there for me and for correcting some passages of the thesis. Julie Boeten NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING Deze scriptie is geschreven in het kader van het Herodotos Project, een onderneming van de Ohio State University in samenwerking met UGent. De doelstelling van het project is het aanleggen van een databank met alle volkeren die gekend waren in de oudheid.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient History Sourcebook: 11Th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA an Ancient City in Greece, the Capital of Laconia and the Most Powerful State of the Peloponnese
    Ancient History Sourcebook: 11th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA AN ancient city in Greece, the capital of Laconia and the most powerful state of the Peloponnese. The city lay at the northern end of the central Laconian plain, on the right bank of the river Eurotas, a little south of the point where it is joined by its largest tributary, the Oenus (mount Kelefina). The site is admirably fitted by nature to guard the only routes by which an army can penetrate Laconia from the land side, the Oenus and Eurotas valleys leading from Arcadia, its northern neighbour, and the Langada Pass over Mt Taygetus connecting Laconia and Messenia. At the same time its distance from the sea-Sparta is 27 m. from its seaport, Gythium, made it invulnerable to a maritime attack. I.-HISTORY Prehistoric Period.-Tradition relates that Sparta was founded by Lacedaemon, son of Zeus and Taygete, who called the city after the name of his wife, the daughter of Eurotas. But Amyclae and Therapne (Therapnae) seem to have been in early times of greater importance than Sparta, the former a Minyan foundation a few miles to the south of Sparta, the latter probably the Achaean capital of Laconia and the seat of Menelaus, Agamemnon's younger brother. Eighty years after the Trojan War, according to the traditional chronology, the Dorian migration took place. A band of Dorians united with a body of Aetolians to cross the Corinthian Gulf and invade the Peloponnese from the northwest. The Aetolians settled in Elis, the Dorians pushed up to the headwaters of the Alpheus, where they divided into two forces, one of which under Cresphontes invaded and later subdued Messenia, while the other, led by Aristodemus or, according to another version, by his twin sons Eurysthenes and Procles, made its way down the Eurotas were new settlements were formed and gained Sparta, which became the Dorian capital of Laconia.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaic Eretria
    ARCHAIC ERETRIA This book presents for the first time a history of Eretria during the Archaic Era, the city’s most notable period of political importance. Keith Walker examines all the major elements of the city’s success. One of the key factors explored is Eretria’s role as a pioneer coloniser in both the Levant and the West— its early Aegean ‘island empire’ anticipates that of Athens by more than a century, and Eretrian shipping and trade was similarly widespread. We are shown how the strength of the navy conferred thalassocratic status on the city between 506 and 490 BC, and that the importance of its rowers (Eretria means ‘the rowing city’) probably explains the appearance of its democratic constitution. Walker dates this to the last decade of the sixth century; given the presence of Athenian political exiles there, this may well have provided a model for the later reforms of Kleisthenes in Athens. Eretria’s major, indeed dominant, role in the events of central Greece in the last half of the sixth century, and in the events of the Ionian Revolt to 490, is clearly demonstrated, and the tyranny of Diagoras (c. 538–509), perhaps the golden age of the city, is fully examined. Full documentation of literary, epigraphic and archaeological sources (most of which have previously been inaccessible to an English-speaking audience) is provided, creating a fascinating history and a valuable resource for the Greek historian. Keith Walker is a Research Associate in the Department of Classics, History and Religion at the University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ubiquity of the Cretan Archer in Ancient Warfare
    1 ‘You’ll be an archer my son!’ The ubiquity of the Cretan archer in ancient warfare When a contingent of archers is mentioned in the context of Greek and Roman armies, more often than not the culture associated with them is that of Crete. Indeed, when we just have archers mentioned in an army without a specified origin, Cretan archers are commonly assumed to be meant, so ubiquitous with archery and groups of mercenary archers were the Cretans. The Cretans are the most famous, but certainly not the only ‘nation’ associated with a particular fighting style (Rhodian slingers and Thracian peltasts leap to mind but there are others too). The long history of Cretan archers can be seen in the sources – according to some stretching from the First Messenian War right down to the fall of Constantinople in 1453. Even in the reliable historical record we find Cretan archer units from the Peloponnesian War well into the Roman period. Associations with the Bow Crete had had a long association with archery. Several Linear B tablets from Knossos refer to arrow-counts (6,010 on one and 2,630 on another) as well as archers being depicted on seals and mosaics. Diodorus Siculus (5.74.5) recounts the story of Apollo that: ‘as the discoverer of the bow he taught the people of the land all about the use of the bow, this being the reason why the art of archery is especially cultivated by the Cretans and the bow is called “Cretan.” ’ The first reliable references to Cretan archers as a unit, however, which fit with our ideas about developments in ancient warfare, seem to come in the context of the Peloponnesian War (431-404 BCE).
    [Show full text]
  • Greece • Crete • Turkey May 28 - June 22, 2021
    GREECE • CRETE • TURKEY MAY 28 - JUNE 22, 2021 Tour Hosts: Dr. Scott Moore Dr. Jason Whitlark organized by GREECE - CRETE - TURKEY / May 28 - June 22, 2021 May 31 Mon ATHENS - CORINTH CANAL - CORINTH – ACROCORINTH - NAFPLION At 8:30a.m. depart from Athens and drive along the coastal highway of Saronic Gulf. Arrive at the Corinth Canal for a brief stop and then continue on to the Acropolis of Corinth. Acro-corinth is the citadel of Corinth. It is situated to the southwest of the ancient city and rises to an elevation of 1883 ft. [574 m.]. Today it is surrounded by walls that are about 1.85 mi. [3 km.] long. The foundations of the fortifications are ancient—going back to the Hellenistic Period. The current walls were built and rebuilt by the Byzantines, Franks, Venetians, and Ottoman Turks. Climb up and visit the fortress. Then proceed to the Ancient city of Corinth. It was to this megalopolis where the apostle Paul came and worked, established a thriving church, subsequently sending two of his epistles now part of the New Testament. Here, we see all of the sites associated with his ministry: the Agora, the Temple of Apollo, the Roman Odeon, the Bema and Gallio’s Seat. The small local archaeological museum here is an absolute must! In Romans 16:23 Paul mentions his friend Erastus and • • we will see an inscription to him at the site. In the afternoon we will drive to GREECE CRETE TURKEY Nafplion for check-in at hotel followed by dinner and overnight. (B,D) MAY 28 - JUNE 22, 2021 June 1 Tue EPIDAURAUS - MYCENAE - NAFPLION Morning visit to Mycenae where we see the remains of the prehistoric citadel Parthenon, fortified with the Cyclopean Walls, the Lionesses’ Gate, the remains of the Athens Mycenaean Palace and the Tomb of King Agamemnon in which we will actually enter.
    [Show full text]
  • INFOPACK for PARTICIPANTS Description of the Project
    Social entrepreneurship for a fair society… for a hopeful future Programme: Erasmus+ KA1: Mobility of Youth Workers. Activity: Training course Addressed to: Active and enthusiastic youth workers or people that work in different fields of social economy, employees or volunteers of the partner organizations and active groups of the region with a direct interest in youth employability. Organiser: Koukouva Social Cooperative Enterprise Project Ref. Number: 2019-3-EL02-KA105-005338 Dates: 07 – 13 June 2020 (excluding travel days) INFOPACK FOR PARTICIPANTS Description of the project As a cooperative, our dreams matched with the values of social economy and we found many solutions through its structures, but we also came across plenty of practices that raised a num- ber of concerns. Thus, recognizing the needs of the current social and economic conditions of most of European countries, as well as the different paths that could be taken due to them and being big support- ers of social economy, we decided to apply for this multinational training course. Through this training course, we intent to host youth workers and people who work in social economy in different countries so that we will together explore the field, exchange good prac- tices and create tools that we can use to facilitate young people understand social economy and its values, find their skills and how they can use them through it. • create a common understanding about the social OBJECTIVES values of Social Economy and how it can bring us closer to a more fair society, • explore the field of social economy and employ- ability in the different countries • create tools that could help the understanding and decision making of young people around social entrepreneurship, • provide, exchange and create tools about plan- ning and developing a social entrepreneurship • enforce youth workers with knowledge and tools on social economy and social entrepreneurship • create a network under common values for fu- ture collaboration.
    [Show full text]
  • Assigning Macroseismic Intensities of Historical Earthquakes from Late 19Th Century in Sw Peloponnese (Greece)
    ASSIGNING MACROSEISMIC INTENSITIES OF HISTORICAL EARTHQUAKES FROM LATE 19TH CENTURY IN SW PELOPONNESE (GREECE) Nikos SAKELLARIOU1 and Vassiliki KOUSKOUNA2 ABSTRACT The seismic activity of Greece has always been present in the country’s history. Numerous earthquakes have occurred in the area of SW Peloponnese, which includes the seismically active faults of Kalamata, Pamisos and Messinian gulf, as well as the subduction zone of the Hellenic arc. In the present paper macroseismic information was collected from contemporary and recent earthquake studies and the local press for three significant earthquakes of this area, i.e. Messini (1885), Filiatra (1886) and Kyparissia (1899). These earthquakes are presented in detail, as far as the flow of information, damage reports, seismological compilations and intensity assignment and distribution are concerned, from which macroseismic parameters (i.e. epicentre, magnitude) were assessed. The macroseismic datapoints of the studied earthquakes were introduced to a database, containing the event dates (OS/NS), source of information and date, the digitized original texts containing all sorts of macroseismic information and, finally, the assigned intensities expressed in EMS98, which may also act as input to the Hellenic Macroseismic Database (http://macroseismology.geol.uoa.gr/). INTRODUCTION Throughout the ages earthquakes have been the most destructive of all natural hazards, having been associated with crises due to their effects in several aspects of human life. In historical times the damage and sudden crippling of the economy of an area led to population movements, emigration or desertification of villages, even small towns. Since we are not able to foresee what will happen in the future, we have to find out what happened in the past and extrapolate to modern times.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan LINDA JANE PIPER 1967
    This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 66-15,122 PIPER, Linda Jane, 1935- A HISTORY OF SPARTA: 323-146 B.C. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1966 History, ancient University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan LINDA JANE PIPER 1967 All Rights Reserved A HISTORY OF SPARTA: 323-1^6 B.C. DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Linda Jane Piper, A.B., M.A. The Ohio State University 1966 Approved by Adviser Department of History PREFACE The history of Sparta from the death of Alexander in 323 B.C; to the destruction of Corinth in 1^6 B.C. is the history of social revolution and Sparta's second rise to military promi­ nence in the Peloponnesus; the history of kings and tyrants; the history of Sparta's struggle to remain autonomous in a period of amalgamation. It is also a period in Sparta's history too often neglected by historians both past and present. There is no monograph directly concerned with Hellenistic Sparta. For the most part, this period is briefly and only inci­ dentally covered in works dealing either with the whole history of ancient Sparta, or simply as a part of Hellenic or Hellenistic 1 2 history in toto. Both Pierre Roussel and Eug&ne Cavaignac, in their respective surveys of Spartan history, have written clear and concise chapters on the Hellenistic period. Because of the scope of their subject, however, they were forced to limit them­ selves to only the most important events and people of this time, and great gaps are left in between.
    [Show full text]