Copyrighted Material

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Copyrighted Material Index Note: page numbers in italics denote tables, maps, or illustrations Abdera 74 Cleomenes 237 ; coins 159, 276 , Abu Simbel 297 277, 279 ; food production 121, 268, Abydos 286 272 ; imports 268 ; Kleoitas 109 ; Achaea/Achaeans: Aigialos 213 ; Naucratis 269–271 ; pottery 191 ; basileus 128, 129, 134 ; Sparta 285 ; trade 268, 272 colonization 100, 104, 105, 107–108, Aegium 88, 91, 108 115, 121 ; democracy 204 ; Aelian 4, 186, 188 dialect 44 ; ethnos 91 ; Aeneas 109, 129 Herodotus 91 ; heroes 73, 108 ; Aeolians 45 , 96–97, 122, 292, 307 ; Homer 52, 172, 197, 215 ; dialect group 44, 45, 46 Ionians 50 ; migration 44, 45 , 50, Aeschines 86, 91, 313, 314–315 96 ; pottery 119 ; as province 68 ; Aeschylus: Persians 287, 308 ; Seven relocation 48 ; warrior tombs 49 Against Thebes 162 ; Suppliant Achilles 128, 129, 132, 137, 172, 181, Maidens 204 216 ; shield of 24, 73, 76, 138–139 Aetolia/Aetolians 20 ; dialect 299 ; Acrae 38 , 103, 110 Erxadieis 285 ; ethnos 91, 92 ; Acraephnium 279 poleis 93 ; pottery 50 ; West Acragas 38 , 47 ; democracy 204 ; Locris 20 foundation COPYRIGHTED 104, 197 ; Phalaris 144 ; Aëtos MATERIAL 62 Theron 149, 289 ; tyranny 150 Africanus, Sextus Julius 31 Adrastus 162 Agamemnon: Aeolians 97 ; anax 129 ; Aegimius 50, 51 Argos 182 ; armor 173 ; Aegina 3 ; Argos 3, 5 ; Athens 183, basileus 128, 129 ; scepter 133 ; 286, 287 ; captured 155 ; Schliemann 41 ; Thersites 206 A History of the Archaic Greek World: ca. 1200–479 BCE, Second Edition. Jonathan M. Hall. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. INDEX 343 Agariste 149, 154, 159, 315, 316 Phoenician 57, 58 ; regional agathoi 136, 137, 145, 178, 202, 211, varieties 27, 290–291, 299 218 Alyattes 149, 304 agelai 198 Amarynthos 1, 89 Agesilaus II 228–229 Amasis 149, 268, 271, 272 Agia Irini 62 Ambracia 74, 204 Agia Pelagia 198 Amisos 104, 120 Agiadai 135–136 Amnisos 196 Agios Andreas 74, 75 Amorgos 74, 86 Agis IV 229–230 Amphictyony: Delphic 20, 86 , 92, 307, agora: Alcaeus 214 ; Athens 79, 80, 84, 312–313, 317 ; Pylaean 20, 313 109, 143, 235, 252, 310 ; Chalcis 2, 5, Amphidamas 2, 4, 6, 7 19–20, 83 ; commercial activity 85 ; Amphiktyon 20, 127 Megara Hyblaea 112–113; amphorai 63, 170, 203, 251, 272 ; as origins 82–84 ; Scheria 72 grave markers 191 ; agriculture 84, 262 ; cash crops 266 ; Nikosthenic 102, 258, 274–275 ; climate 217 ; colonial Panathenaic 254 ; Tyrrhenian foundations 103, 120–121; extensive/ 258 intensive 263, 265–267, 273; mixed Amyclae 61, 78, 89, 119 farming 264 ; Solon 193 ; surplus/ Anacreon 22, 149, 201, 273, 297 subsistence 217, 262–268, 273, 319; Anavysos kouros 179, 180 , 181, 248 trade 123, 266, 267 Anaxandridas 213 Ahhiyawa 52 Anaxilas 149, 150, 151, 288, 289 Aigialeis 213 Anaximander 21, 205 Aigikoreis 51, 211 Anaximenes 205 Aineia 109 Andania 186 Ainesidemos of Rhodes 151 andreion 198 Aithiaieis 186 Andromache 181, 222, 301 Aktaios 127 Andromadas 138 Al Mina 57, 100–102, 103, 115, 293 Andros 74, 79, 81, 100, 279 Alalia 104 Ankhimolios 236 Alcaeus 2 ; armor 175 ; Ano Mazaraki-Rakita 88, 93 autobiographical 318 ; elitist Antenor 223, 235 ideology 137, 201 ; Pittacus 143, Anthela 313, 316 145 ; polis 72 ; rustics 214 Antigone 222 Alcibiades 299 Antinous 129 Alcinous 71, 129, 135, 137–138, 181 Antiochus of Syracuse 106, 107–108, Alcmaeon 181, 313, 315 109, 184, 186 ; Taras 116–118, 120, Alcmaeonids 145, 315 ; exiled 236– 122 237, 242, 248 ; Herodotus 21 ; and Antiokhidai 131–132 Philaidai 159 ; property 181, 241, Antiope 251, 252 248, 250 ; Pythian priestess 28, 236 ; Antipatros of Magnesia 313 Thucydides 21 ; tyranny 236, 309 Antiphemos cult 109 Alcman 22, 222, 231, 306 antiquarians 16 Alexander I 287 Antissa 75 Alkamenes 184 Aphaea, sanctuary of 109, 275 Alopeke 250 Aphrati 196 alphabet; Greek 57, 58, 299 ; Aphrodite 170, 268, 269, 271, 297 introduction of 57–58 ; apoikia 97, 103, 105, 292 344 INDEX Apollo: Archegetes 296 ; Heraion 31, 62, 86, 89, 109, 141, Daphnephoros 58, 87, 252 ; 278 ; hoplite shield 168 ; Delphinios 86, 140, 198 ; inscription 109, 141 ; kinship Hyacinthius 89 ; Maleatas 62 ; groups 131 ; Melantas 128 ; Naucratis 268, 269 ; Ptoieus 180 ; Messenian War 185 ; Pythaeus 161 ; Pythios 21, 214, 313, metalworkers 84, 162 ; Nauplia 160 ; 317 ; Thermon 91 ; see also Delphic Odeion 134–135 ; Peloponnese 161– Oracle 162 ; Persians 308, 312 ; Apollodorus of Athens 50 Pheidon 144, 145, 146, 154–164 ; Apollonia 104, 120 pottery 50, 115, 162, 291; settlement Aramaeans 101 ; languages 293 pattern 85, 190 ; Spartans 3, 155, Arcadia/Arcadians: Azania 93 ; 157–158, 162, 182–183, 197 ; dialect 44, 99 ; ethnos 91 ; federal stability 132 ; territories 155, 162, league 92, 279 ; Messenian War 185 ; 182, 256 ; warrior grave 134–135, Olympia 302 ; Praxiteles 151 169–170 Arcado-Cypriot dialects 44, 46 Ariadne 222 archaeology: Dark Age 60–66; dating Arion of Methymna 149 methods 7, 33–39 ; Dorian Aristagoras 283–284 migration 48–50 ; evidence 6–7, Aristides 285 28–29, 190, 318 ; public buildings 81– Aristion of Paros 149, 223, 224 84 ; trade 272–273 ; see also burials Aristis 163 Archidamus II 12 aristocracy: armor 171 ; basileus 134 ; Archidamus III 118 dêmos 204, 242, 256, 310 ; elegiac Archilochus of Paros 22, 107 poetry 201–203 ; emergence 134– autobiographical 6, 23 ; dates for 4, 138, 319 ; governance 201, 205 ; 6 ; fi ghting 1, 3, 6 ; symposium 221 ; Greek/non-Greek 303 ; hoplite Thasos 100, 106 ; tyranny 146 ; combat 168, 171, 178–179 ; wine 273 symposium 202, 203–204, 223, 273 ; architectural styles 37, 292 Theognis 22, 136–137, 143 ; archons 29, 31, 109, 141–142, 143, tyrants 145, 146–147, 152, 236, 319 ; 144, 147 see also elites Areopagus 204, 206, 242 Aristogiton 235–236 Arete 222 Aristophanes 12, 175, 308 Arethousa spring 4, 116, 158 Aristotle: Callisthenes 30, 313, 315 ; Argadeis 51, 211 Cleisthenes 240, 249 ; coinage 276 ; Argive plain 53, 89, 160, 161, 182, 291 date for 4 ; Euboea 1, 6 ; fi ghting 6, Argolid 44, 47, 49, 74, 91, 183, 22; 168, 179; kingship 127, 168 ; pottery 291 land 229 ; Lycurgus 209, 210, 229 ; Argos/Argives: Aegina 3, 5 ; agora 81, middle social class 168, 202 ; 84, 162 ; Asine 160, 161 ; ostracism 243 ; Pheidon 154, 155; basileus 128, 135 ; Cleisthenes 160, Pisistratus 254 ; Pittacus 147 ; 183 ; Cleomenes 183, 322 ; Plutarch on 19–20, 208 ; polis 69–70, conquests 89, 160, 213, 249, 322; 79, 90 ; Politics 70, 138, 146 ; Solonian Dark Age 49, 64, 73 ; Delphic council 206 ; Sparta 19, 208, 210, Oracle 158, 162, 175 ; 215 ; Taras 118 ; tyranny 146–149, democracy 204, 220, 322 ; 154, 169 ; see also Athenian Constitution dialect 47, 290 ; exploitation 188, Arkhelaos 136 263 ; fortifi cations 74 ; graves 61, 77 , armor 52, 89, 167, 171–173, 176, 273; 79, 135, 190, 214, 278, 291 ; see also hoplites, panoply INDEX 345 Arrian 174 coins 275, 277, 278, 279 ; Artaphernes 284 confl ict 217 ; Delian League 309, Artemis: Amarynthos 1, 89; 321 ; Delion 167, 178; Brauron 240, 253 ; Delos 222–223 ; democracy 200, 204, 205, 238, 241 ; Ephesus 275, 278 ; Orthia 179, Eleusinion 253 ; elite families 242 ; 231–232, 233, 297 expedition to Sicily 296 ; fi nes 278 ; Artemisium 286 , 287 fortifi cations 74 ; grain 123 ; aryballos 37, 38, 113, 115 , 171, 273 graves 76, 77 , 79, 101, 190–191, 200 ; Ascra 76, 80, 122, 215 Herodotus 322 ; Ionia 5, 44, 50, Ashkelon, sacking of 37 100, 283–284 ; kingship 127, 145 ; Asine 74, 91, 160, 161, 186 ; Marathon 167, 214, 284–285 ; pottery 201 Megara 246, 247, 257 ; Assarlik 99 metalworkers 84, 190 ; months 30 ; Assiros 66, 75 as norm 227 ; Parthenon 220, 254 ; Assyria/Assyrians 37, 39, 170, 197, 283 Persians 38, 254, 287; phylai 211, Astarte 170 238, 239 ; prosperity 168, 190, 256; asteios/agroikos 214 rural settlements 243, 247–249, 257 ; astoi 214, 247, 249 sacked by Persians 287; settlement astu 70, 71 pattern 73, 79, 85, 134, 190, 256 ; Atene deme 267 Sigeum 104 ; stability 132 ; Athena 115 ; Alea 85 ; Itonia 92 ; Themistoclean Walls 39 ; Koukounaries 81 ; Polias 86, 119, tyranny 145, 150, 152, 235–236; vase 141, 148, 253 ; Polioukhos 86 ; painters 262 ; Zeus Polieus 86 ; see Pronaia 313, 315; Zagora 79 also Cleisthenes Athenaeus 228 Attica 192 ; agrarian unrest 217–219, Athenian Constitution (Aristotelian) 70 ; 266 ; burials 190, 194, 242, 291, 293; archons 128, 141–142 ; census civic rights 243–244 ; dialect 290, classes 175–176 ; Cleisthenes 237, 299 ; graves 62, 180, 190, 200, 248; 239, 240 ; Damasias 147 ; Homer 245 ; internal peasants 267 ; phylai 211, 240, 247 ; colonization 245, 258 ; Panathenaea, Pisistratus 146, 250, 252, 256 ; Great 235 ; pottery 58, 63, 100, 102, poor 217 ; regional factions 250 ; 109, 115, 170, 193, 257, 291 ; Solon 22, 155, 175–176, 206, 217, sanctuaries 191, 193, 194 ; script 59, 218, 220 116, 290–201 ; settlements 91, 190, Athenian Treasury, Delphi 250 243 ; seventh-century gap 190–194, Athens/Athenians: acropolis 38, 39, 79, 256 ; Theseus 78, 244–245 ; 86, 148, 191, 222, 223 , 236, 237, 249, unifi cation 78–79, 243–251, 252, 258 250, 253, 254, 309 ; Aegina 3, 183, Attic–Ionic dialects 44, 45, 46 286, 287 ; agora 79, 80, 84, 109, 143, autarkeia 70 235, 252, 310 ; Altar of the Twelve authority: achieved 142 ; ascribed 134, Gods 21, 84, 252 ; Archaios 142 ; see also basileus ; kingship Neos 253–255, 258 ; archons 29, 31, Auxesia statue 183, 268 109, 128, 141–142, 144, 147, 103, Azania 93 236 ; Athena Polias 86 ; Bluebeard Azoria 198 Temple 254–255 ; Brea 105 ; Chalcis 91, 184, 254 ; chattel Babylon 24, 197, 283 slavery 267, 293; citizenship Bacchiadae 143, 145, 188, 201 rights 214, 215, 219 ; Bacchylides 108 Cleomenes 236, 237, 241 ; Bachofen, Johann Jakob 228 346 INDEX barbaroi 293, 297–298, 308 Pithecusae 103 ; see also cremations; Barka 104 graves basileus 127, 147, 206, 213 ; Burn, A.
Recommended publications
  • Thyrea, Thermopylae and Narrative Patterns in Herodotus Author(S): John Dillery Source: the American Journal of Philology, Vol
    Reconfiguring the Past: Thyrea, Thermopylae and Narrative Patterns in Herodotus Author(s): John Dillery Source: The American Journal of Philology, Vol. 117, No. 2 (Summer, 1996), pp. 217-254 Published by: The Johns Hopkins University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1561895 Accessed: 06/09/2010 12:38 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=jhup. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Johns Hopkins University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The American Journal of Philology.
    [Show full text]
  • Female Property Ownership and Status in Classical and Hellenistic Sparta
    Female Property Ownership and Status in Classical and Hellenistic Sparta Stephen Hodkinson University of Manchester 1. Introduction The image of the liberated Spartiate woman, exempt from (at least some of) the social and behavioral controls which circumscribed the lives of her counterparts in other Greek poleis, has excited or horrified the imagination of commentators both ancient and modern.1 This image of liberation has sometimes carried with it the idea that women in Sparta exercised an unaccustomed influence over both domestic and political affairs.2 The source of that influence is ascribed by certain ancient writers, such as Euripides (Andromache 147-53, 211) and Aristotle (Politics 1269b12-1270a34), to female control over significant amounts of property. The male-centered perspectives of ancient writers, along with the well-known phenomenon of the “Spartan mirage” (the compound of distorted reality and sheer imaginative fiction regarding the character of Spartan society which is reflected in our overwhelmingly non-Spartan sources) mean that we must treat ancient images of women with caution. Nevertheless, ancient perceptions of their position as significant holders of property have been affirmed in recent modern studies.3 The issue at the heart of my paper is to what extent female property-holding really did translate into enhanced status and influence. In Sections 2-4 of this paper I shall approach this question from three main angles. What was the status of female possession of property, and what power did women have directly to manage and make use of their property? What impact did actual or potential ownership of property by Spartiate women have upon their status and influence? And what role did female property-ownership and status, as a collective phenomenon, play within the crisis of Spartiate society? First, however, in view of the inter-disciplinary audience of this volume, it is necessary to a give a brief outline of the historical context of my discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roles of Solon in Plato's Dialogues
    The Roles of Solon in Plato’s Dialogues Dissertation Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Samuel Ortencio Flores, M.A. Graduate Program in Greek and Latin The Ohio State University 2013 Dissertation Committee: Bruce Heiden, Advisor Anthony Kaldellis Richard Fletcher Greg Anderson Copyrighy by Samuel Ortencio Flores 2013 Abstract This dissertation is a study of Plato’s use and adaptation of an earlier model and tradition of wisdom based on the thought and legacy of the sixth-century archon, legislator, and poet Solon. Solon is cited and/or quoted thirty-four times in Plato’s dialogues, and alluded to many more times. My study shows that these references and allusions have deeper meaning when contextualized within the reception of Solon in the classical period. For Plato, Solon is a rhetorically powerful figure in advancing the relatively new practice of philosophy in Athens. While Solon himself did not adequately establish justice in the city, his legacy provided a model upon which Platonic philosophy could improve. Chapter One surveys the passing references to Solon in the dialogues as an introduction to my chapters on the dialogues in which Solon is a very prominent figure, Timaeus- Critias, Republic, and Laws. Chapter Two examines Critias’ use of his ancestor Solon to establish his own philosophic credentials. Chapter Three suggests that Socrates re- appropriates the aims and themes of Solon’s political poetry for Socratic philosophy. Chapter Four suggests that Solon provides a legislative model which Plato reconstructs in the Laws for the philosopher to supplant the role of legislator in Greek thought.
    [Show full text]
  • THE EPONYMOUS OFFICIALS of GREEK CITIES: I Aus: Zeitschrift Für Papyrologie Und Epigraphik 83 (1990) 249–288
    ROBERT K. SHERK THE EPONYMOUS OFFICIALS OF GREEK CITIES: I aus: Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 83 (1990) 249–288 © Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn 249 The Eponymous Officials of Greek Cities: I (A) Introduction The eponymous official or magistrate after whom the year was named in Greek cities or as- sociations is well known to all epigraphists under various titles: archon, prytanis, stephanepho- ros, priest, etc. Some details about them have appeared in many articles and in scattered pas- sages of scholarly books. However, not since the publication of Clemens Gnaedinger, De Graecorum magistratibus eponymis quaestiones epigraphicae selectae (Diss. Strassburg 1892) has there been a treatment of the subject as a whole, although the growth of the material in this regard has been enormous.1 What is missing, however, is an attempt to bring the material up to date in a comprehensive survey covering the whole Greek world, at least as far as possible. The present article, of which this is only the first part, will present that material in a geographically organized manner: mainland Greece and the adjacent islands, then the Aegean islands, Asia Minor and Thrace, Syria, Egypt, Cyrene, Sicily, and southern Italy. All the epi- graphic remains of that area have been examined and catalogued. General observations and conclusions will be presented after the evidence as a whole has been given. I. Earliest Examples of Eponymity The earliest form of writing appeared in Sumer and Assyria sometime within the last half of the fourth millennium BC, and from there it spread westward. Thus, it is not at all surpris- ing that the Mesopotamian civilizations also made the earliest use of assigning names or events to years in dating historical records.
    [Show full text]
  • The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography
    Faculty of Literature and Philosophy Julie Boeten The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Abii-Ionians) With a case-study: the Cappadocians Master thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Linguistics and Literature, Greek and Latin. 2015 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Mark Janse UGent Department of Greek Linguistics Co-Promotores: Prof. Brian Joseph Ohio State University Dr. Christopher Brown Ohio State University ACKNOWLEDGMENT In this acknowledgment I would like to thank everybody who has in some way been a part of this master thesis. First and foremost I want to thank my promotor Prof. Janse for giving me the opportunity to write my thesis in the context of the Herodotos Project, and for giving me suggestions and answering my questions. I am also grateful to Prof. Joseph and Dr. Brown, who have given Anke and me the chance to be a part of the Herodotos Project and who have consented into being our co- promotores. On a whole other level I wish to express my thanks to my parents, without whom I would not have been able to study at all. They have also supported me throughout the writing process and have read parts of the draft. Finally, I would also like to thank Kenneth, for being there for me and for correcting some passages of the thesis. Julie Boeten NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING Deze scriptie is geschreven in het kader van het Herodotos Project, een onderneming van de Ohio State University in samenwerking met UGent. De doelstelling van het project is het aanleggen van een databank met alle volkeren die gekend waren in de oudheid.
    [Show full text]
  • Ovid Book 12.30110457.Pdf
    METAMORPHOSES GLOSSARY AND INDEX The index that appeared in the print version of this title was intentionally removed from the eBook. Please use the search function on your eReading device to search for terms of interest. For your reference, the terms that ap- pear in the print index are listed below. SINCE THIS index is not intended as a complete mythological dictionary, the explanations given here include only important information not readily available in the text itself. Names in parentheses are alternative Latin names, unless they are preceded by the abbreviation Gr.; Gr. indi- cates the name of the corresponding Greek divinity. The index includes cross-references for all alternative names. ACHAMENIDES. Former follower of Ulysses, rescued by Aeneas ACHELOUS. River god; rival of Hercules for the hand of Deianira ACHILLES. Greek hero of the Trojan War ACIS. Rival of the Cyclops, Polyphemus, for the hand of Galatea ACMON. Follower of Diomedes ACOETES. A faithful devotee of Bacchus ACTAEON ADONIS. Son of Myrrha, by her father Cinyras; loved by Venus AEACUS. King of Aegina; after death he became one of the three judges of the dead in the lower world AEGEUS. King of Athens; father of Theseus AENEAS. Trojan warrior; son of Anchises and Venus; sea-faring survivor of the Trojan War, he eventually landed in Latium, helped found Rome AESACUS. Son of Priam and a nymph AESCULAPIUS (Gr. Asclepius). God of medicine and healing; son of Apollo AESON. Father of Jason; made young again by Medea AGAMEMNON. King of Mycenae; commander-in-chief of the Greek forces in the Trojan War AGLAUROS AJAX.
    [Show full text]
  • General Index
    GENERAL INDEX A.GILIM, and n. Aesopic tradition, , and abstractions, n. nn. –, Acarnania, Aetna, , Acastus, Aetna, n. Accius, and n. Agamemnon, n. , , , accusative, , n. , –, , –, , – Agdistis, Achelous, Agenor, Achilles, , , , , , , , ages, myth of, see races, myth of –, , , , , Agias of Troezen, , Acontius, , n. , , agriculture, , , , , , – and n. , , , , , –, Actaeon, n. , , , , n. , –, ; Actor, agriculture section in Works and Acusilaus of Argos, and n. , Days, , , –, and n. Agrius, Adad, aidos, n. , ; personified, , adamant, adjective(s), , , Aietes, Admonitions of Ipuwar,andn. Aigipan, Adodos, ainos, , –, Adrasteia, Aither, and n. Adriatic (sea), Aithon, , n. Aegean (sea), , , aitiology, , , nn. –, Aegimius, – and n. , , , and Aegle, , n. , , , , Aelian Ajax son of Oileus, Historical miscellany, , Ajax son of Telamon, , , – and n. Aeolic dialect, , –, , Akkadian, n. , n. , , , , –; East Al Mina, , or Asiatic Aeolic, –, Alalu, , n. , , Alcaeus, , , n. Aeolids, , , Alcidamas, , , , , , Aeolis, Eastern, , , –, , n. Aeolism, , , , Alcinous, , n. , n. , Aeolus, –, , , , Aeschines, Alcmaeonidae, Aeschylus, , , , and Alcmaeonis, n. , Alcman, n. , and n. , Prometheus Bound, n. , and n. n. Alcmaon, – general index Alcmene, –, –, Antoninus Liberalis, , , n. , , , Anu, –, , –, –, aoidos see singer Alcyone, , , , aorist, , –, Alexander Aetolus, , n. apate, ; personified, Alexander the Great, n. , Aphrodite, , , n. , and n. , n. , and n. ,
    [Show full text]
  • Marathon 2,500 Years Edited by Christopher Carey & Michael Edwards
    MARATHON 2,500 YEARS EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SUPPLEMENT 124 DIRECTOR & GENERAL EDITOR: JOHN NORTH DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATIONS: RICHARD SIMPSON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS PROCEEDINGS OF THE MARATHON CONFERENCE 2010 EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON 2013 The cover image shows Persian warriors at Ishtar Gate, from before the fourth century BC. Pergamon Museum/Vorderasiatisches Museum, Berlin. Photo Mohammed Shamma (2003). Used under CC‐BY terms. All rights reserved. This PDF edition published in 2019 First published in print in 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN: 978-1-905670-81-9 (2019 PDF edition) DOI: 10.14296/1019.9781905670819 ISBN: 978-1-905670-52-9 (2013 paperback edition) ©2013 Institute of Classical Studies, University of London The right of contributors to be identified as the authors of the work published here has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Designed and typeset at the Institute of Classical Studies TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory note 1 P. J. Rhodes The battle of Marathon and modern scholarship 3 Christopher Pelling Herodotus’ Marathon 23 Peter Krentz Marathon and the development of the exclusive hoplite phalanx 35 Andrej Petrovic The battle of Marathon in pre-Herodotean sources: on Marathon verse-inscriptions (IG I3 503/504; Seg Lvi 430) 45 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaic Eretria
    ARCHAIC ERETRIA This book presents for the first time a history of Eretria during the Archaic Era, the city’s most notable period of political importance. Keith Walker examines all the major elements of the city’s success. One of the key factors explored is Eretria’s role as a pioneer coloniser in both the Levant and the West— its early Aegean ‘island empire’ anticipates that of Athens by more than a century, and Eretrian shipping and trade was similarly widespread. We are shown how the strength of the navy conferred thalassocratic status on the city between 506 and 490 BC, and that the importance of its rowers (Eretria means ‘the rowing city’) probably explains the appearance of its democratic constitution. Walker dates this to the last decade of the sixth century; given the presence of Athenian political exiles there, this may well have provided a model for the later reforms of Kleisthenes in Athens. Eretria’s major, indeed dominant, role in the events of central Greece in the last half of the sixth century, and in the events of the Ionian Revolt to 490, is clearly demonstrated, and the tyranny of Diagoras (c. 538–509), perhaps the golden age of the city, is fully examined. Full documentation of literary, epigraphic and archaeological sources (most of which have previously been inaccessible to an English-speaking audience) is provided, creating a fascinating history and a valuable resource for the Greek historian. Keith Walker is a Research Associate in the Department of Classics, History and Religion at the University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Design in the Ancient World
    LANNI & VERMEULE 64 STAN. L. REV. 907 (DO NOT DELETE) 5/23/2012 11:39 AM CONSTITUTIONAL DESIGN IN THE ANCIENT WORLD Adriaan Lanni* & Adrian Vermeule** This paper identifies two distinctive features of ancient constitutional design that have largely disappeared from the modern world: constitution-making by single individuals and constitution-making by foreigners. We consider the virtues and vices of these features, and argue that under plausible conditions single founders and outsider founders offer advantages over constitution-making by representative bodies of citizens, even in the modern world. We also discuss the implications of adding single founders and outsider founders to the constitutional toolkit by describing how constitutional legitimacy would work, and how consti- tutional interpretation would be conducted, under constitutions that display either or both of the distinctive features of ancient constitutional design. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................... 908 I. HISTORY ........................................................................................................... 911 A. The Greek Lawgivers ................................................................................. 914 B. Distinctive Features of Ancient Constitutional Design .............................. 918 II. VIRTUES AND VICES OF ANCIENT CONSTITUTION-MAKING ............................. 919 A. Single Founders.........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Politics and Folktale in the Classical World
    James S, Ruebel Iowa State University’ Ames Politics and Folktale in the Classical World Abstract The usurpation of myths and folktales for political purposes is a phenomenon that is well attested during classical antiquity. The preservation of heroic legends was probably motivated in part by social or political considerations, and the process continued into historical times. Our focus has now shifted from the question of historicity to the degree to which folktale has embellished history, and to what degree historical figures have exploited folktale and myth for real-life ends. The Peisistratid tyrants in Athens employed myths and religious symbols both in the initial stages of Peisistratus’ rise to power and in the maintenance of the dynasty over several decades. Alexander the Great made special efforts to associate him ­ self with the hero Heracles; the emphasis on Heracles diminished as Alexander’s interests turned toward administration of a united Greek-Persian empire. Scipio Africanus was viewed by contemporary and later Roman authors as a Roman Alexander, a fact that is revealing about his personality but that complicates study of his own image-making efforts. Cato Censorius, on the other hand, created his own conservative Roman image by appealing to distinguished historical Romans and by emphasizing cardinal Roman virtues in his public oratory and literary efforts. Greek myths tend to generalize events, Roman myths make them con­ crete; Greek legends transcend time and space, Roman legends insist upon his­ toricity; Greek myths are largely related to Greek religion, Roman myths and folktales are not part of Roman religion, but part of Roman history, and should be examined first of all from that perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • About: Plato an Entity of Type : Person, from Named Graph : Within Data Space : Dbpedia.Org
    About: Plato An Entity of Type : person, from Named Graph : http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space : dbpedia.org Plato (/ˈpleɪtoʊ/; Greek: Πλάτων, Plátōn, "broad"; 428/427 or 424/423 – 348/347 BCE) was a philosopher, as well as mathematician, in Classical Greece. He is considered an essential figure in the development of philosophy, especially the Western tradition, and he founded the Academy in Athens, the first institution of higher learning in the Western world. Along with Socrates and his most famous student, Aristotle, Plato laid the foundations of Western philosophy and science. Property Value dbo:abstract Plato (/ˈpleɪtoʊ/; Greek: Πλάτων, Plátōn, "broad"; 428/427 or 424/423 – 348/347 BCE) was a philosopher, as well as mathematician, in Classical Greece. He is considered an essential figure in the development of philosophy, especially the Western tradition, and he founded the Academy in Athens, the first institution of higher learning in the Western world. Along with Socrates and his most famous student, Aristotle, Plato laid the foundations of Western philosophy and science. Alfred North Whitehead once noted: "the safest general characterization of the European philosophical tradition is that it consists of a series of footnotes to Plato."Plato's dialogues have been used to teach a range of subjects, including philosophy, logic, ethics, rhetoric, religion and mathematics. His lasting themes include Platonic love, the theory of forms, the five regimes, innate knowledge, among others. His theory of forms launched a unique perspective on abstract objects, and led to a school of thought called Platonism. Plato's writings have been published in several fashions; this has led to several conventions regarding the naming and referencing of Plato's texts.
    [Show full text]