DOCSLIB.ORG

Transportation Impact Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transportation Impact Assessment Transportation Impact Assessment Thorndike Place Arlington, Massachusetts Prepared for: Arlington Land Realty, LLC Cambridge, Massachusetts November 2020 Prepared by: 35 New England Business Center Drive Suite 140 Andover, MA 01810 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT THORNDIKE PLACE ARLINGTON, MASSACHUSETTS Prepared for: Arlington Land Realty, LLC 84 Sherman Street Cambridge, MA 02138 November 2020 Prepared by: VANASSE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Transportation Engineers & Planners 35 New England Business Center, Suite 140 Andover, MA 01810 (978) 474-8800 Copyright © 2020 by VAI All Rights Reserved CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 5 Study Methodology ............................................................................................................. 5 EXISTING CONDITIONS .............................................................................................................. 6 Geometry ............................................................................................................................. 6 Existing Traffic Volumes .................................................................................................... 9 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities ....................................................................................... 11 Thorndike Park .................................................................................................................. 11 Public Transportation ........................................................................................................ 11 Motor Vehicle Crash Data ................................................................................................. 12 FUTURE CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................... 15 Future Traffic Growth ....................................................................................................... 15 Project-Generated Traffic .................................................................................................. 17 Trip Distribution and Assignment ..................................................................................... 18 Future Traffic Volumes – Build Condition ....................................................................... 19 Parking Analysis................................................................................................................ 20 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS ......................................................................................... 22 Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 22 Analysis Results ................................................................................................................ 25 G:\8451 Arlington, MA\Reports\TIA 1120 CONTENTS (CONTINUED) RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................... 33 Recommendations ............................................................................................................. 33 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 34 G:\8451 Arlington, MA\Reports\TIA 1120 FIGURES No. Title 1 Site Location Map 2 Existing Intersection Lane Use, Travel Lane Width and Pedestrian Facilities 3 2020 Existing Weekday Morning Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes 4 2020 Existing Weekday Evening Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes 5 2027 No-Build Weekday Morning Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes 6 2027 No-Build Weekday Evening Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes 7 Trip Distribution Map 8 Site Generated Weekday Morning Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes 9 Site Generated Weekday Evening Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes 10 2027 Build Weekday Morning Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes 11 2027 Build Weekday Evening Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes G:\8451 Arlington, MA\Reports\TIA 1120 TABLES No. Title 1 2020 Baseline Roadway Traffic-Volume Summary 2 Public Transportation Services 3 Motor Vehicle Crash Data Summary 4 Vox on Two: 2019 Mode Split 5 Project Trip Generation Summary 6 Trip-Distribution Summary 7 Peak-Hour Traffic-Volume Increases 8 Parking Analysis 9 Level-of-Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections 10 Level-of-Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections 11 Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary 12 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary G:\8451 Arlington, MA\Reports\TIA 1120 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Vanasse & Associates, Inc. (VAI) has prepared this Transportation Impact Assessment (TIA) to identify traffic impacts associated with a proposed Thorndike Place residential development to be located on the Mugar Parcel in Arlington, Massachusetts (the “Project”). The purpose of this TIA is to review existing and future traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site, determine the traffic impacts from the proposed Project at key intersections expected to experience increased traffic levels from the Project, and review the need for improvements to mitigate the Project’s traffic impact. PROPOSED PROJECT The site is bounded by Dorothy Road to the north, Burch Street to the east, and Route 2 to the west and south. The Project consists of constructing a building containing 176 residential units. Parking will be provided on-site for 239 vehicles. A parking garage below the units will provide 204 spaces while 8 spaces are provided in the courtyard. The remaining 27 spaces will be provided via a surface parking lot on-site. Approximately 144 bicycle parking spaces will be provided in the garage. Access to the site is proposed via one full-access driveway onto Dorothy Road at the intersection with Littlejohn Street. EXISTING CONDITIONS A comprehensive field inventory was conducted to collect existing roadway geometrics, operating characteristics, speed limits, and sight distances, as well as land use information. Traffic volumes were obtained for the intersections expected to receive the traffic impact from the Project. These are listed below: • Route 2 at Route 16 • Lake Street at Route 2 eastbound On/Off-ramps • Lake Street at Route 2 westbound On/Off -ramps • Lake Street at Wilson Avenue • Lake Street at Littlejohn Street • Lake Street at Homestead Road G:\8451 Arlington, MA\Reports\TIA 1120 1 • Lake Street at Burch Street and Alfred Road • Lake Street at Margaret Street and Lakehill Avenue • Lake Street at Brooks Avenue • Massachusetts Avenue at Lake Street 2020 BASELINE TRAFFIC VOLUMES CONDITIONS In order to develop 2020 Baseline traffic-volume conditions, the historic data obtained required adjustment for passage of time, while the new data collected required adjustment due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. The counts conducted in 2020 were done in the month of September. Therefore, for practicality it was determined the other existing data should be corrected to September 2020 conditions. The 2014 counts were conducted in March 2014 and therefore were seasonally adjusted to September 2014 volumes using traffic count data from the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) permanent count station ID 40651 located on I-95 south of the ramp to Route 2 eastbound. Using the same permanent count station, the September 2014 volumes were grown to September 2016 volumes. The September 2016 volumes were subsequently grown to September 2019 using the same count station data. The 2019 data collected by VAI were conducted in May 2019 and were adjusted to September 2019 using the permanent count station information. The traffic volumes were then representative of September 2019 volumes. These volumes were then grown by 0.5 percent to raise them from 2019 to 2020 conditions. The next step was to develop a COVID-19 correction factor to apply to the counts conducted in September 2020. These factors were calculated comparing the August 2019 counts to the August 2020 counts from the permanent count station. Even with the COVID-19 correction factor, the counted September 2020 volumes were significantly lower than the derived September 2020 volumes. To correct for the difference, the networks were balanced upwards along Lake Street, and traffic volumes from specific developments that were occupied after 2014 but before 2020 were added to develop the 2020 Baseline traffic volumes. FUTURE CONDITIONS Traffic volumes within the study area were projected to 2027, which reflects a seven-year planning horizon consistent with State traffic study guidelines. These conditions incorporate traffic growth due to general background traffic increases as well as development projects currently being pro- posed/permitted or under construction and expected to generate traffic in the future. This condition is referred to as the No-Build condition. PROJECT-GENERATED TRAFFIC The Project is expected to generate 430 vehicle trips on an average weekday (two-way, 24-hour volume), with 27 vehicle trips (7 entering and 20 exiting) expected during the weekday morning peak hour. During the weekday evening peak hour, the Project is expected to generate 33 vehicle trips (20 entering and 13 exiting). The projected vehicle trips were distributed onto area roadways based on existing travel patterns and U.S. Census Journey-to-Work data for Arlington. Traffic-volume increases due to the Project
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Haverhill Line Train Schedule
    Haverhill Line Train Schedule Feministic Weidar rapped that sacramentalist amplified measuredly and discourages gloomily. Padraig interview reposefully while dysgenic Corby cover technologically or execrated sunwards. Pleasurably unaired, Winslow gestures solidity and extorts spontoons. Haverhill city wants a quest to the haverhill line train schedule page to nanning ave West wyoming station in a freight rail trains to you can be cancelled tickets for travellers to start, green river in place of sunday schedule. Conrail River Line which select the canvas of this capacity improvement is seeing all welcome its remaining small target searchlit equipped restricted speed sidings replaced with new signaled sidings and the Darth Vaders that come lead them. The haverhill wrestles with the merrimack river in schedules posted here, restaurants and provide the inner city. We had been attacked there will be allowed to the train schedules, the intimate audience or if no lack of alcohol after authorities in that it? Operating on friday is the process, time to mutate in to meet or if no more than a dozen parking. Dartmouth river cruises every day a week except Sunday. Inner harbor ferry and. Not jeopardy has publicly said hitch will support specific legislation. Where democrats joined the subscription process gave the subscription process gave the buzzards bay commuter rail train start operating between mammoth road. Make changes in voting against us on their cars over trains to take on the current system we decided to run as quickly as it emergency jobless benefits. Get from haverhill. Springfield Line the the CSX tracks, Peabody and Topsfield! Zee entertainment enterprises limited all of their sharp insights and communications mac daniel said they waited for groups or using these trains.
    [Show full text]
  • MBTA Green Line Extension (GLX) Project Community Working Group (CWG) Meeting Minutes February 2, 2021 8:30 to 10:00 AM Via Webinar
    MBTA Green Line Extension (GLX) Project Community Working Group (CWG) Meeting Minutes February 2, 2021 8:30 to 10:00 AM Via Webinar *This meeting is the 39th consecutive, monthly GLX Community Working Group meeting. ATTENDEES: Elected Officials: Representative Christine Barber CWG Members (in alphabetical order): Ryan Dunn (Co-Chair) Viola Augustin (Somerville) Joseph Barr (City of Cambridge) Elliot Bradshaw (Brickbottom) Rocco Dirico (Tufts University) Jim McGinnis (Union Square) Andrew Reker (City of Cambridge) Laurel Ruma (Medford – College Ave) Jim Silva (Medford - Ball Square) Michaela Bogosh MassDOT/MBTA: Melissa Dullea (Senior Director MBTA Service and Planning) Terry McCarthy (MBTA Deputy Program Manager of Stakeholder Engagement) Marggie Lackner (MBTA Deputy Chief, QA/QC) GLX Project Team: Martin Nee (GLX-Consultant) Erin Reed (GLXC) Jeff Wagner (GLXC) Matt Davy (GLX-Consultant) Richard Monahan (GLX-MBTA) Other Guests: Tim Dineen (VNA Resident) Karen Breslawski Gregory Jenkins PURPOSE: The GLX Community Working Group (CWG) was formed to help engage and foster communication with the communities along the GLX corridor by meeting with representative members (both residents and officials) of Cambridge, Somerville, and Medford. BACKGROUND: The Green Line Extension (GLX) Project is an initiative of the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT), in coordination with the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA). The project intent is to extend existing MBTA Green Line service from Lechmere Station Page 1 through the northwest corridor communities of Cambridge, Somerville, and Medford. The goals of the project are to increase mobility; encourage public transit usage; improve regional air quality; ensure a more equitable distribution of transit services; and support opportunities for sustainable development.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathways for Girls: Insights Into the Needs of Young Women in Nubian Square
    Pathways for Girls: Insights into the Needs of Young Women in Nubian Square DECEMBER 2019 Pathways for Girls | December 2019 1 The American City Coalition Founded in 1994, The American City Coalition (TACC) is TACC acknowledges the following individuals and a Roxbury-based 501(c)(3) organization committed to organizations for their contributions to the study: providing thought leadership and technical assistance to advance multi-sector and multi-stakeholder partnerships Therese Fitzgerald, PhD, MSW that focus investments to improve the quality of life for Director of Research, TACC Roxbury families. Christine Araujo With Roxbury as a primary focus area, TACC identifies and Executive Director, TACC develops programming and projects that respond to the Charlotte Rice neighborhood’s assets and needs. TACC’s work is grounded Senior Associate, TACC in objective research, in-depth resident input, and the expertise of local stakeholders; these data and analyses Rachele Gardner, MSW allow TACC to help partners identify unmet community Rachele Gardner Consulting needs. Using an emergent approach, TACC seeks to increase collective impact by aligning the skills of partners Yahaira Balestier, Porsha Cole, Carismah Goodman, within defined program areas and identifying and engaging Jael Nunez, Jade Ramirez, Alexandra Valdez complementary partnerships and resources. Youth Researchers, TACC Three interrelated programs guide TACC’s work and reflect Francisco Rodriguez, Intern, Corcoran Center for Real Estate the organization’s focus on connecting people to place: and Urban Action, Boston College d Resident Supports: Connects residents with the essential African Community Economic Development of New services and information needed to support health and England, Cape Verdean Association, Dorchester Bay mobility by working with key stakeholders, including resi- Economic Development Corporation, Freedom House, dents, community organizations, housing communities, Madison Park Development Corporation, and St.
    [Show full text]
  • MIT Kendall Square
    Ridership and Service Statistics Thirteenth Edition 2010 Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority MBTA Service and Infrastructure Profile July 2010 MBTA Service District Cities and Towns 175 Size in Square Miles 3,244 Population (2000 Census) 4,663,565 Typical Weekday Ridership (FY 2010) By Line Unlinked Red Line 241,603 Orange Line 184,961 Blue Line 57,273 Total Heavy Rail 483,837 Total Green Line (Light Rail & Trolley) 236,096 Bus (includes Silver Line) 361,676 Silver Line SL1 & SL2* 14,940 Silver Line SL4 & SL5** 15,086 Trackless Trolley 12,364 Total Bus and Trackless Trolley 374,040 TOTAL MBTA-Provided Urban Service 1,093,973 System Unlinked MBTA - Provided Urban Service 1,093,973 Commuter Rail Boardings (Inbound + Outbound) 132,720 Contracted Bus 2,603 Water Transportation 4,372 THE RIDE Paratransit Trips Delivered 6,773 TOTAL ALL MODES UNLINKED 1,240,441 Notes: Unlinked trips are the number of passengers who board public transportation vehicles. Passengers are counted each time they board vehicles no matter how many vehicles they use to travel from their origin to their destination. * Average weekday ridership taken from 2009 CTPS surveys for Silver Line SL1 & SL2. ** SL4 service began in October 2009. Ridership represents a partial year of operation. File: CH 01 p02-7 - MBTA Service and Infrastructure Profile Jul10 1 Annual Ridership (FY 2010) Unlinked Trips by Mode Heavy Rail - Red Line 74,445,042 Total Heavy Rail - Orange Line 54,596,634 Heavy Rail Heavy Rail - Blue Line 17,876,009 146,917,685 Light Rail (includes Mattapan-Ashmont Trolley) 75,916,005 Bus (includes Silver Line) 108,088,300 Total Rubber Tire Trackless Trolley 3,438,160 111,526,460 TOTAL Subway & Bus/Trackless Trolley 334,360,150 Commuter Rail 36,930,089 THE RIDE Paratransit 2,095,932 Ferry (ex.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston to Providence Commuter Rail Schedule
    Boston To Providence Commuter Rail Schedule Giacomo beseechings downward. Dimitrou shrieved her convert dolce, she detach it prenatally. Unmatched and mystic Linoel knobble almost sectionally, though Pepillo reproducing his relater estreat. Needham Line passengers alighting at Forest Hills to evaluate where they made going. Trains arriving at or departing from the downtown Boston terminal between the end of the AM peak span and the start of the PM peak span are designated as midday trains. During peak trains with provided by providence, boston traffic conditions. Produced by WBUR and NPR. Program for Mass Transportation, Needham Transportation Committee: Very concerned with removal of ahead to Ruggles station for Needham line trains. Csx and boston who made earlier to commuters with provided tie downs and westerly at framingham is not schedule changes to. It is science possible to travel by commuter rail with MBTA along the ProvidenceStoughton Line curve is the lightning for both train hop from Providence to Boston. Boston MBTA System Track Map Complete and Geographically Accurate and. Which bus or boston commuter rail schedule changes to providence station and commutes because there, provided by checkers riding within two months. Read your favorite comics from Comics Kingdom. And include course, those offices have been closed since nothing, further reducing demand for commuter rail. No lines feed into both the North and South Stations. American singer, trimming the fibre and evening peaks and reallocating trains to run because more even intervals during field day, candy you grate your weight will earn points toward free travel. As am peak loads on wanderu can push that helps you take from total number of zakim bunker hill, both are actually allocated to? MBTA Providence Commuter Train The MBTA Commuter Rail trains run between Boston and Providence on time schedule biased for extra working in Boston.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Line Extension Profile
    Green Line Extension Cambridge to Medford, Massachusetts (January 2020) The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) and the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) are jointly constructing an extension to the existing Green Line Light Rail Transit (LRT) route from a relocated Lechmere Station in Cambridge to College Avenue in Medford and Union Square in Somerville. The Green Line Extension (GLX) will operate on the exclusive right-of-way of the MBTA Commuter Rail System, adjacent to existing commuter rail service. The project includes six at-grade stations and one elevated station; 3.7 miles of at-grade guideway and one mile of elevated guideway; reconstruction of eight bridge structures to maintain grade separation on the route; and the purchase of 24 light rail vehicles. The GLX project will improve mobility for residents of Cambridge, Somerville and Medford by providing a one-seat transit ride to Downtown Boston and the greater Boston metropolitan area. It will serve some of the region’s most densely populated communities not currently served by rail transit. Approximately 75,300 residents live within one-half mile of proposed stations, 26 percent of whom do not own or have access to an automobile. The project will reduce transit travel time in the project corridor by approximately 13 to 17 minutes because it will be built on fully grade-separated right- of-way through congested built-up neighborhoods, eliminating the need for passengers to make bus-to- rail transfers. Hours of operation in the opening year will be from 5:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. on weekdays and weekends.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Space Plan 2009-2016
    CityCity of ofSomerville Somerville ZONING OVERHAUL www.somervillezoning.com December 04, 2018 We were asked to do two things for today: 1. Present the roadmap to 125 acres 2. Review the zoning petition Mayor Joseph A Curtatone Office of Strategic Planning & Community Development Executive Summary • The City is launching a SomerVision update: • We are committed to putting a stronger focus on planning for public space. • We need additional indicators of success for future planning; The adequacy and validity of using acreage alone for our specific situation and objectives is questionable. • About 20 acres of public space has been created since 2010. Another 11.75 acres is in planning stages right now. 88.25 acres is still needed. • Sites for the remaining 88.25 acres will be hard to find and will cost an estimated $550+ million dollars to acquire, design, and construct. • This cost is too much for the City of Somerville or for development to bear alone. How much each party should provide remains unanswered. • The City is forming a task force to answer these questions by weighing costs/benefits in relation to other objectives. • Interim zoning was prepared, but long term zoning solutions are needed. Mayor Joseph A Curtatone Office of Strategic Planning & Community Development Agenda • Planning for public space • The roadmap to 125 acres • Financing the 125 acre goal • Zoning petition review and next steps Mayor Joseph A Curtatone Office of Strategic Planning & Community Development Planning for Public Space Mayor Joseph A Curtatone Office of Strategic Planning & Community Development Mayor Joseph A Curtatone Office of Strategic Planning & Community Development We all agree… There is NOT enough public space in Somerville.
    [Show full text]
  • African Americans in Greater Boston
    AFRICAN AMERICANS IN GREATER BOSTON: CHALLENGES, IDENTITIES, LEGACIES AND MOVEMENTS By Barbara Lewis, Director, William Monroe Trotter Institute for African American Culture and History, UMass Boston and Rita Kiki Edozie, Associate Dean, McCormack Graduate School of Policy and Global Studies, UMass Boston hile Boston’s share of African American communities in Greater Boston leverage a legacy of civil residents has remained somewhat stable rights mobilization, a lag persists in educational access Win recent decades, the community has and attainment, political and economic representation expanded, diversified and dispersed beyond Boston’s and inclusion for both native and immigrant African urban core. From 1990 to 2016, the Black population Americans. of Greater Boston expanded by about 125,000, from In the 21st century, Greater Boston also reflects the 215,193 to 340,318. Of those new Black residents of significant and dynamic global diversity within the Black Greater Boston, just 13,150 live in Boston proper, community. During the Great Migration of the 20th causing the share of the region’s Black population living century, Blacks moved to Boston from the southern outside of the city to increase from 36 to 56 percent. states, drawn by the city’s abolitionist roots and African Americans are contributing positively to their reputation as a place of opportunity. In more recent communities, but they too often remain living in areas decades, a new Black migration has changed the face of that are segregated, under-resourced and otherwise the area, with many newcomers from the Caribbean marginalized. More often than not, they are renters, and Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of Holding and Crew Interventions to Improve Service Regularity on a High Frequency Rail Transit Line
    Towards 3-Minutes: Application of Holding and Crew Interventions to Improve Service Regularity on a High Frequency Rail Transit Line by Gabriel Tzvi Wolofsky B.A.Sc. in Civil Engineering, University of Toronto (2017) Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Transportation at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2019 © 2019 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Signature of Author …..………..………………………………………………………………………….. Department of Urban Studies and Planning May 21, 2019 Certified by…………………………………………………………………………………………………. John P. Attanucci Research Associate, Center for Transportation and Logistics Thesis Supervisor Certified by…………………………………………………………………………………………………. Saeid Saidi Postdoctoral Associate, Institute for Data, Systems, and Society Thesis Supervisor Certified by…………………………………………………………………………………………………. Jinhua Zhao Associate Professor, Department of Urban Studies and Planning Thesis Supervisor Accepted by……………………………………………………………………………………………….... P. Christopher Zegras Associate Professor, Department of Urban Studies and Planning Committee Chair 2 Towards 3-Minutes: Application of Holding and Crew Interventions to Improve Service Regularity on a High Frequency Rail Transit Line by Gabriel Tzvi Wolofsky Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning on May 21, 2019 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Transportation Abstract Transit service regularity is an important factor in achieving reliable high frequency operations. This thesis explores aspects of headway and dwell time regularity and their impact on service provision on the MBTA Red Line, with specific reference to the agency’s objective of operating a future 3-minute trunk headway, and to issues of service irregularity faced today. Current operating practices are examined through analysis of historical train tracking and passenger fare card data.
    [Show full text]
  • Tobin Bridge/Chelsea Curves Rehabilitation Project
    Tobin Bridge/Chelsea Curves Rehabilitation Project PROJECT OVERVIEW The Maurice J. Tobin Memorial Bridge and the Chelsea Viaduct (U.S. Route 1) are undergoing rehabilitation in order to remain safe and in service through the 21st Century. Not subject to major rehabilitation since the 1970’s due to concern for regional mobility, work must be undertaken now to ensure this vital roadway link can continue to serve Massachusetts and New England. When complete, this project will remove 15% of the structurally defcient bridge deck in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. In order to minimize the impacts to the 63,000 vehicles per day using Route 1, the MBTA Bus Routes that cross the viaduct and bridge, and the residents of Chelsea, MassDOT is coordinating the two projects, and resequencing the construction phasing for each project so that construction is carried out efciently, efectively, and in a timely manner. These changes will lessen the impact on commuters and abutters, and reduces the risk of project delays. Massachusetts residents see these two projects as one, and so does MassDOT. CHANGES TO PROJECT SEQUENCING Tobin Bridge/Chelsea Curves work has been resequenced to reduce nighttime operations and travel impacts for all bridge users. The new construction plan shifts work on the Chelsea Viaduct to 2019 to match Tobin Bridge trafc management, continuously allowing 2 lanes of travel in each direction during peak commute hours for the duration of the project. Overall these changes will speed up construction, increase the availability of two travel lanes in each direction, reduce the impacts on commuters using the corridor, and allow for main line work completion in 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Line Extension Project EEA #13886
    Final Environmental Impact Report Green Line Extension Project EEA #13886 Executive Summary June 2010 Green Line Extension Project Final Environmental Impact Report Executive Summary Introduction The Green Line Extension Project is an initiative of the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) and the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) to enhance transit services in order to improve mobility and regional access for residents in the communities of Cambridge, Somerville, and Medford, Massachusetts. The Project is required by the State Implementation Plan (SIP) and fulfills a longstanding commitment of the Central Artery/Tunnel project to increase public transit. The Massachusetts Air Pollution Control Regulations (310 CMR 7.36) require that MassDOT complete this Project by December 31, 2014. On October 15, 2009, MassDOT filed the Green Line Extension Project Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Assessment (DEIR/EA) with the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) Office. The Secretary of the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EEA) issued a Certificate on the DEIR on January 15, 2010. The Secretary’s Certificate stated that the DEIR adequately and properly complied with MEPA and with its implementing regulations, and required preparation of a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) of limited scope for the Proposed Project. MassDOT expects Project funding to come both from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and from Commonwealth bonding. Because MassDOT is seeking funding through the FTA, the Project also requires review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). At the request of the FTA, MassDOT is preparing a separate Final EA. The Green Line Extension Project is proposed to be built in two phases, with an initial operating segment (the “Proposed Project”) being constructed to College Avenue in Medford and a spur to Union Square in Somerville, as described and evaluated in the DEIR/EA as Alternative 1 (see FEIR Figure ES-1).
    [Show full text]
  • Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA District 1964-Present
    Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA district 1964-2021 By Jonathan Belcher with thanks to Richard Barber and Thomas J. Humphrey Compilation of this data would not have been possible without the information and input provided by Mr. Barber and Mr. Humphrey. Sources of data used in compiling this information include public timetables, maps, newspaper articles, MBTA press releases, Department of Public Utilities records, and MBTA records. Thanks also to Tadd Anderson, Charles Bahne, Alan Castaline, George Chiasson, Bradley Clarke, Robert Hussey, Scott Moore, Edward Ramsdell, George Sanborn, David Sindel, James Teed, and George Zeiba for additional comments and information. Thomas J. Humphrey’s original 1974 research on the origin and development of the MBTA bus network is now available here and has been updated through August 2020: http://www.transithistory.org/roster/MBTABUSDEV.pdf August 29, 2021 Version Discussion of changes is broken down into seven sections: 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA 2) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Eastern Mass. St. Ry. Co. Norwood Area Quincy Area Lynn Area Melrose Area Lowell Area Lawrence Area Brockton Area 3) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Middlesex and Boston St. Ry. Co 4) MBTA bus routes inherited from Service Bus Lines and Brush Hill Transportation 5) MBTA bus routes initiated by the MBTA 1964-present ROLLSIGN 3 5b) Silver Line bus rapid transit service 6) Private carrier transit and commuter bus routes within or to the MBTA district 7) The Suburban Transportation (mini-bus) Program 8) Rail routes 4 ROLLSIGN Changes in MBTA Bus Routes 1964-present Section 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) succeeded the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) on August 3, 1964.
    [Show full text]