8086 TAP 0221.Docx

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

8086 TAP 0221.Docx Transportation Access Plan 209 Harvard Street Brookline, Massachusetts Prepared for: 209 Harvard Street Development, LLC, c/o CMS Partners Cambridge, Massachusetts February 2021 Prepared by: 35 New England Business Center Drive Suite 140 Andover, MA 01810 TRANSPORTATION ACCESS PLAN 209 HARVARD STREET BROOKLINE, MASSACHUSETTS Prepared for: 209 Harvard Development, LLC c/o CMS Partners P.O. Box 382265 Cambridge, MA 02238 February 2021 Prepared by: VANASSE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Transportation Engineers & Planners 35 New England Business Center, Suite 140 Andover, MA 01810 (978) 474-8800 Copyright © 2021 by VAI All Rights Reserved CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 5 Study Methodology ........................................................................................................ 5 EXISTING CONDITIONS ......................................................................................................... 6 Geometry ........................................................................................................................ 6 2020 Baseline Traffic Volumes ...................................................................................... 7 Pedestrian And Bicycle Facilities ................................................................................... 9 Public Transportation ..................................................................................................... 9 Motor Vehicle Crash Data .............................................................................................. 10 Sight Distance Evaluation .............................................................................................. 12 FUTURE CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................ 14 Future Traffic Growth .................................................................................................... 14 Project-Generated Traffic ............................................................................................... 16 Trip Distribution And Assignment ................................................................................. 18 Future Traffic Volumes – Build Condition .................................................................... 19 Parking Analysis ............................................................................................................. 20 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS ...................................................................................... 22 Methodology .................................................................................................................. 22 Analysis Results ............................................................................................................. 25 RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................... 28 Recommendations .......................................................................................................... 28 Conclusions .................................................................................................................... 29 G:\8086 Brookline, MA\Reports\8086 TAP 0221.docx FIGURES No. Title 1 Site Location Map 2 Existing Intersection Lane Use, Travel Lane Width and Pedestrian Facilities 3 2020 Baseline Weekday Morning Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes 4 2020 Baseline Weekday Evening Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes 5 2027 No-Build Weekday Morning Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes 6 2027 No-Build Weekday Evening Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes 7 Trip Distribution Map 8 Project Generated Weekday Morning Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes 9 Project Generated Weekday Evening Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes 10 2027 Build Weekday Morning Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes 11 2027 Build Weekday Evening Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes G:\8086 Brookline, MA\Reports\8086 TAP 0221.docx TABLES No. Title 1 2020 Baseline Roadway Traffic-Volume Summary 2 Public Transportation Services 3 Motor Vehicle Crash Data Summary 4 Sight Distance Measurements 5 Mode Split Characteristics 6 Project Trip Generation Summary 7 Trip-Distribution Summary 8 Peak-Hour Traffic-Volume Increases 9 Existing Parking Utilization 10 Parking Analysis th 11 HCM 6 Edition Level-of-Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections 12 HCM 2000 Level-of-Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections 13 Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary G:\8086 Brookline, MA\Reports\8086 TAP 0221.docx EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Vanasse & Associates, Inc. (VAI) has prepared this Transportation Access Plan (TAP) to identify traffic impacts associated with a proposed 44-unit residential building and 1,300 square feet (sf) of retail space to be located at 209 Harvard Street in Brookline, Massachusetts (the “Project”). The purpose of this TAP is to review existing and future traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site, determine the traffic impacts from the proposed Project at key intersections expected to experience increased traffic levels from the Project, and review the need for improvements to mitigate the Project’s traffic impact. PROPOSED PROJECT Currently, the site contains a 5-story medical office building with a parking garage and surface parking towards the rear of the site that accommodates 63 vehicles. The Project will construct a new 5-story building over the surface parking lot in the rear of the site containing 44 residential units. The existing medical office building is also proposed to have 1,300 sf redeveloped into retail space. There will be ground floor parking under the new building as well as a below grade garage. The site will accommodate approximately 56 vehicles post construction. Access to the site will be provided through an existing driveway onto Harvard Street. EXISTING CONDITIONS A comprehensive field inventory was conducted to collect existing roadway geometrics, operating characteristics, speed limits, and sight distances, as well as land use information. Traffic volumes were obtained for the intersections expected to receive the traffic impact from the Project. These are listed below: • Harvard Street at Sewall Avenue/Stearns Road • Harvard Street at 209 Harvard Street Driveway • Harvard Street at Marion Street • Harvard Street at Vernon Street • Longwood Avenue at Sewall Avenue G:\8086 Brookline, MA\Reports\8086 TAP 0221.docx 1 2020 BASELINE TRAFFIC VOLUMES CONDITIONS In order to develop 2020 Baseline traffic-volume conditions, the historic data obtained required adjustment for passage of time, while the new data collected required adjustment due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. The counts conducted in 2020 were done in the month of December. Therefore, for practicality it was determined the other existing data should be corrected to December 2020 conditions. The 2016 counts were conducted in September 2016 and were determined to be above average month conditions and therefore were not seasonally adjusted. These volumes were then grown by 1 percent per year to 2018 Baseline conditions. Then using the MassDOT Yearly Growth Rates for roadway group U3 – Urban Principal Arterial the 2018 volumes were grown to 2019 volumes by 0.4 percent. Due to COVID-19, the MassDOT considers 2019 traffic volumes 2020 baseline traffic volumes. The traffic volumes counted in December 2020 were adjusted to pre COVID-19 conditions using the MassDOT permanent count station, AET131, located on the Massachusetts Turnpike west of Commonwealth Avenue. Traffic volumes from December 2019 were compared to December 2020 to determine a percent decrease in traffic due to COVID-19. Based on this comparison it was determined that traffic volumes decreased by approximately 60 percent during the weekday morning peak period and by approximately 65 percent during the weekday evening peak period. Therefore, the December 2020 counts were grown by 60 percent and 65 percent during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours, respectively. Then the December 2020 traffic volumes were seasonally adjusted to average month condition using Station AET13. The 2019 seasonal variation at Station AET13 indicates that December volumes at 7 percent below average month conditions. Therefore, the December 2020 traffic volumes were growth by 7 percent up to average month conditions. Lastly, the traffic volumes were balanced upwards between intersections to obtain the 2020 Baseline traffic volumes used in analysis. FUTURE CONDITIONS Traffic volumes within the study area were projected to 2027, which reflects a seven-year planning horizon consistent with State traffic study guidelines. These conditions incorporate traffic growth due to general background traffic increases as well as development projects currently being pro- posed/permitted or under construction and expected to generate traffic in the future. This condition is referred to as the No-Build condition. PROJECT-GENERATED TRAFFIC The Project is expected to generate 128 vehicle trips on an average weekday (two way, 24-hour volume), with 8 vehicle trips (3 vehicles entering and 5 exiting) expected during the weekday morning peak hour. During the weekday evening peak hour, the Project is expected to generate 15 new vehicle trips (8 vehicles entering and 7 exiting). The projected vehicle trips were distributed onto area roadways based on existing travel patterns and U.S.
Recommended publications
  • CHAPTER 2 Progress Since the Last PMT
    CHAPTER 2 Progress Since the Last PMT The 2003 PMT outlined the actions needed to bring the MBTA transit system into a state of good repair (SGR). It evaluated and prioritized a number of specific enhancement and expansion projects proposed to improve the system and better serve the regional mobility needs of Commonwealth residents. In the inter- vening years, the MBTA has funded and implemented many of the 2003 PMT priorities. The transit improvements highlighted in this chapter have been accomplished in spite of the unsus- tainable condition of the Authority’s present financial structure. A 2009 report issued by the MBTA Advisory Board1 effectively summarized the Authority’s financial dilemma: For the past several years the MBTA has only balanced its budgets by restructuring debt liquidat- ing cash reserves, selling land, and other one-time actions. Today, with credit markets frozen, cash reserves depleted and the real estate market at a stand still, the MBTA has used up these options. This recession has laid bare the fact that the MBTA is mired in a structural, on-going deficit that threatens its viability. In 2000 the MBTA was re-born with the passage of the Forward Funding legislation.This legislation dedicated 20% of all sales taxes collected state-wide to the MBTA. It also transferred over $3.3 billion in Commonwealth debt from the State’s books to the T’s books. In essence, the MBTA was born broke. Throughout the 1990’s the Massachusetts sales tax grew at an average of 6.5% per year. This decade the sales tax has barely averaged 1% annual growth.
    [Show full text]
  • MBTA Green Line Extension (GLX) Project Community Working Group (CWG) Meeting Minutes February 2, 2021 8:30 to 10:00 AM Via Webinar
    MBTA Green Line Extension (GLX) Project Community Working Group (CWG) Meeting Minutes February 2, 2021 8:30 to 10:00 AM Via Webinar *This meeting is the 39th consecutive, monthly GLX Community Working Group meeting. ATTENDEES: Elected Officials: Representative Christine Barber CWG Members (in alphabetical order): Ryan Dunn (Co-Chair) Viola Augustin (Somerville) Joseph Barr (City of Cambridge) Elliot Bradshaw (Brickbottom) Rocco Dirico (Tufts University) Jim McGinnis (Union Square) Andrew Reker (City of Cambridge) Laurel Ruma (Medford – College Ave) Jim Silva (Medford - Ball Square) Michaela Bogosh MassDOT/MBTA: Melissa Dullea (Senior Director MBTA Service and Planning) Terry McCarthy (MBTA Deputy Program Manager of Stakeholder Engagement) Marggie Lackner (MBTA Deputy Chief, QA/QC) GLX Project Team: Martin Nee (GLX-Consultant) Erin Reed (GLXC) Jeff Wagner (GLXC) Matt Davy (GLX-Consultant) Richard Monahan (GLX-MBTA) Other Guests: Tim Dineen (VNA Resident) Karen Breslawski Gregory Jenkins PURPOSE: The GLX Community Working Group (CWG) was formed to help engage and foster communication with the communities along the GLX corridor by meeting with representative members (both residents and officials) of Cambridge, Somerville, and Medford. BACKGROUND: The Green Line Extension (GLX) Project is an initiative of the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT), in coordination with the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA). The project intent is to extend existing MBTA Green Line service from Lechmere Station Page 1 through the northwest corridor communities of Cambridge, Somerville, and Medford. The goals of the project are to increase mobility; encourage public transit usage; improve regional air quality; ensure a more equitable distribution of transit services; and support opportunities for sustainable development.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathways for Girls: Insights Into the Needs of Young Women in Nubian Square
    Pathways for Girls: Insights into the Needs of Young Women in Nubian Square DECEMBER 2019 Pathways for Girls | December 2019 1 The American City Coalition Founded in 1994, The American City Coalition (TACC) is TACC acknowledges the following individuals and a Roxbury-based 501(c)(3) organization committed to organizations for their contributions to the study: providing thought leadership and technical assistance to advance multi-sector and multi-stakeholder partnerships Therese Fitzgerald, PhD, MSW that focus investments to improve the quality of life for Director of Research, TACC Roxbury families. Christine Araujo With Roxbury as a primary focus area, TACC identifies and Executive Director, TACC develops programming and projects that respond to the Charlotte Rice neighborhood’s assets and needs. TACC’s work is grounded Senior Associate, TACC in objective research, in-depth resident input, and the expertise of local stakeholders; these data and analyses Rachele Gardner, MSW allow TACC to help partners identify unmet community Rachele Gardner Consulting needs. Using an emergent approach, TACC seeks to increase collective impact by aligning the skills of partners Yahaira Balestier, Porsha Cole, Carismah Goodman, within defined program areas and identifying and engaging Jael Nunez, Jade Ramirez, Alexandra Valdez complementary partnerships and resources. Youth Researchers, TACC Three interrelated programs guide TACC’s work and reflect Francisco Rodriguez, Intern, Corcoran Center for Real Estate the organization’s focus on connecting people to place: and Urban Action, Boston College d Resident Supports: Connects residents with the essential African Community Economic Development of New services and information needed to support health and England, Cape Verdean Association, Dorchester Bay mobility by working with key stakeholders, including resi- Economic Development Corporation, Freedom House, dents, community organizations, housing communities, Madison Park Development Corporation, and St.
    [Show full text]
  • MIT Kendall Square
    Ridership and Service Statistics Thirteenth Edition 2010 Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority MBTA Service and Infrastructure Profile July 2010 MBTA Service District Cities and Towns 175 Size in Square Miles 3,244 Population (2000 Census) 4,663,565 Typical Weekday Ridership (FY 2010) By Line Unlinked Red Line 241,603 Orange Line 184,961 Blue Line 57,273 Total Heavy Rail 483,837 Total Green Line (Light Rail & Trolley) 236,096 Bus (includes Silver Line) 361,676 Silver Line SL1 & SL2* 14,940 Silver Line SL4 & SL5** 15,086 Trackless Trolley 12,364 Total Bus and Trackless Trolley 374,040 TOTAL MBTA-Provided Urban Service 1,093,973 System Unlinked MBTA - Provided Urban Service 1,093,973 Commuter Rail Boardings (Inbound + Outbound) 132,720 Contracted Bus 2,603 Water Transportation 4,372 THE RIDE Paratransit Trips Delivered 6,773 TOTAL ALL MODES UNLINKED 1,240,441 Notes: Unlinked trips are the number of passengers who board public transportation vehicles. Passengers are counted each time they board vehicles no matter how many vehicles they use to travel from their origin to their destination. * Average weekday ridership taken from 2009 CTPS surveys for Silver Line SL1 & SL2. ** SL4 service began in October 2009. Ridership represents a partial year of operation. File: CH 01 p02-7 - MBTA Service and Infrastructure Profile Jul10 1 Annual Ridership (FY 2010) Unlinked Trips by Mode Heavy Rail - Red Line 74,445,042 Total Heavy Rail - Orange Line 54,596,634 Heavy Rail Heavy Rail - Blue Line 17,876,009 146,917,685 Light Rail (includes Mattapan-Ashmont Trolley) 75,916,005 Bus (includes Silver Line) 108,088,300 Total Rubber Tire Trackless Trolley 3,438,160 111,526,460 TOTAL Subway & Bus/Trackless Trolley 334,360,150 Commuter Rail 36,930,089 THE RIDE Paratransit 2,095,932 Ferry (ex.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston to Providence Commuter Rail Schedule
    Boston To Providence Commuter Rail Schedule Giacomo beseechings downward. Dimitrou shrieved her convert dolce, she detach it prenatally. Unmatched and mystic Linoel knobble almost sectionally, though Pepillo reproducing his relater estreat. Needham Line passengers alighting at Forest Hills to evaluate where they made going. Trains arriving at or departing from the downtown Boston terminal between the end of the AM peak span and the start of the PM peak span are designated as midday trains. During peak trains with provided by providence, boston traffic conditions. Produced by WBUR and NPR. Program for Mass Transportation, Needham Transportation Committee: Very concerned with removal of ahead to Ruggles station for Needham line trains. Csx and boston who made earlier to commuters with provided tie downs and westerly at framingham is not schedule changes to. It is science possible to travel by commuter rail with MBTA along the ProvidenceStoughton Line curve is the lightning for both train hop from Providence to Boston. Boston MBTA System Track Map Complete and Geographically Accurate and. Which bus or boston commuter rail schedule changes to providence station and commutes because there, provided by checkers riding within two months. Read your favorite comics from Comics Kingdom. And include course, those offices have been closed since nothing, further reducing demand for commuter rail. No lines feed into both the North and South Stations. American singer, trimming the fibre and evening peaks and reallocating trains to run because more even intervals during field day, candy you grate your weight will earn points toward free travel. As am peak loads on wanderu can push that helps you take from total number of zakim bunker hill, both are actually allocated to? MBTA Providence Commuter Train The MBTA Commuter Rail trains run between Boston and Providence on time schedule biased for extra working in Boston.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Line Extension Profile
    Green Line Extension Cambridge to Medford, Massachusetts (January 2020) The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) and the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) are jointly constructing an extension to the existing Green Line Light Rail Transit (LRT) route from a relocated Lechmere Station in Cambridge to College Avenue in Medford and Union Square in Somerville. The Green Line Extension (GLX) will operate on the exclusive right-of-way of the MBTA Commuter Rail System, adjacent to existing commuter rail service. The project includes six at-grade stations and one elevated station; 3.7 miles of at-grade guideway and one mile of elevated guideway; reconstruction of eight bridge structures to maintain grade separation on the route; and the purchase of 24 light rail vehicles. The GLX project will improve mobility for residents of Cambridge, Somerville and Medford by providing a one-seat transit ride to Downtown Boston and the greater Boston metropolitan area. It will serve some of the region’s most densely populated communities not currently served by rail transit. Approximately 75,300 residents live within one-half mile of proposed stations, 26 percent of whom do not own or have access to an automobile. The project will reduce transit travel time in the project corridor by approximately 13 to 17 minutes because it will be built on fully grade-separated right- of-way through congested built-up neighborhoods, eliminating the need for passengers to make bus-to- rail transfers. Hours of operation in the opening year will be from 5:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. on weekdays and weekends.
    [Show full text]
  • African Americans in Greater Boston
    AFRICAN AMERICANS IN GREATER BOSTON: CHALLENGES, IDENTITIES, LEGACIES AND MOVEMENTS By Barbara Lewis, Director, William Monroe Trotter Institute for African American Culture and History, UMass Boston and Rita Kiki Edozie, Associate Dean, McCormack Graduate School of Policy and Global Studies, UMass Boston hile Boston’s share of African American communities in Greater Boston leverage a legacy of civil residents has remained somewhat stable rights mobilization, a lag persists in educational access Win recent decades, the community has and attainment, political and economic representation expanded, diversified and dispersed beyond Boston’s and inclusion for both native and immigrant African urban core. From 1990 to 2016, the Black population Americans. of Greater Boston expanded by about 125,000, from In the 21st century, Greater Boston also reflects the 215,193 to 340,318. Of those new Black residents of significant and dynamic global diversity within the Black Greater Boston, just 13,150 live in Boston proper, community. During the Great Migration of the 20th causing the share of the region’s Black population living century, Blacks moved to Boston from the southern outside of the city to increase from 36 to 56 percent. states, drawn by the city’s abolitionist roots and African Americans are contributing positively to their reputation as a place of opportunity. In more recent communities, but they too often remain living in areas decades, a new Black migration has changed the face of that are segregated, under-resourced and otherwise the area, with many newcomers from the Caribbean marginalized. More often than not, they are renters, and Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2020 Schedule, Effective June 22, 2020 FRANKLIN LINE with FOXBORO PILOT
    FRANKLIN LINE with FOXBORO PILOT Summer 2020 schedule, effective June 22, 2020 Monday to Friday Saturday & Sunday Inbound to Boston AM PM Inbound to Boston AM PM 710 746 712 714 748 716 718 720 750 7722 7752 754 724 7756 726 728 758 730 732 ZONE STATION TRAIN # 700 740 702 7704 7742 7708 7744 SATURDAY TRAIN # 1702 1704 1706 1708 1710 1712 1714 1716 1718 Bikes Allowed SAT SAT ZONE STATION SUNDAY TRAIN # ONLY ONLY 2706 2708 2710 2712 2714 2716 2718 6 Forge Park/495 5:18 - 6:03 6:50 - 7:47 - 9:24 - 10:55 12:20 - 1:37 2:54 3:55 - 4:58 - - 7:45 - 8:07 9:10 - 10:30 11:50 Bikes Allowed 6 Franklin/Dean Coll. 5:25 - 6:10 6:57 - 7:54 - 9:31 - 11:02 12:27 - 1:44 3:01 4:02 - 5:05 - - 7:52 - 8:14 9:17 - 10:37 11:57 6 Forge Park/495 6:40 8:40 10:40 12:40 2:40 4:40 6:40 8:40 10:40 5 Norfolk 5:32 - 6:17 7:04 - 8:01 - 9:38 - 11:09 12:34 - 1:51 3:08 4:09 - 5:12 - - 7:59 - 8:21 9:24 - 10:44 12:04 6 Franklin/Dean Coll. 6:47 8:47 10:47 12:47 2:47 4:47 6:47 8:47 10:47 4 Foxboro - 5:47 - - 7:23 - 8:19 - 10:29 - - 1:29 - - - 4:32 - 5:29 6:34 - 8:07 - - 9:49 - - 5 Norfolk 6:54 8:54 10:54 12:54 2:54 4:54 6:54 8:54 10:54 4 Walpole 5:39 - 6:24 7:11 - 8:08 - 9:45 - 11:16 12:41 - 1:58 3:23 4:24 - 5:26 - - 8:06 - 8:36 9:31 - 10:51 12:11 4 Walpole 7:01 9:01 11:01 1:01 3:01 5:01 7:01 9:01 11:01 4 Plimptonville - - - f 7:13 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 Windsor Gardens 7:06 9:06 11:06 1:06 3:06 5:06 7:06 9:06 f 11:05 4 Windsor Gardens 5:42 6:00 6:28 7:16 7:36 8:12 - 9:49 10:42 11:20 12:45 1:42 - 3:28 - 4:45 - - f 6:47 - - - - 10:02 - - 3 Norwood Central
    [Show full text]
  • 2013-0583-3S Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA)
    Official Audit Report – Issued June 16, 2014 Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority For the period January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2012 State House Room 230 Boston, MA 02133 [email protected] www.mass.gov/auditor June 16, 2014 Dr. Beverly Scott, General Manager Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority State Transportation Building 10 Park Plaza, Suite 3910 Boston, MA 02116 Dear Dr. Scott: I am pleased to provide this performance audit of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA). This report details the audit objectives, scope, methodology, findings, and recommendations for the audit period, January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2012. My audit staff discussed the contents of this report with management of the MBTA, and their comments are reflected in this report. I would also like to express my appreciation to the MBTA for the cooperation and assistance provided to my staff during the audit. Sincerely, Suzanne M. Bump Auditor of the Commonwealth 2013-0583-3A TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................... 1 OVERVIEW OF AUDITED AGENCY ........................................................................................................................... 3 AUDIT OBJECTIVES, SCOPE, AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................. 4 DETAILED AUDIT RESULTS AND FINDINGS WITH AUDITEE’S RESPONSE ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Green Line Extension Project EEA #13886
    Final Environmental Impact Report Green Line Extension Project EEA #13886 Executive Summary June 2010 Green Line Extension Project Final Environmental Impact Report Executive Summary Introduction The Green Line Extension Project is an initiative of the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) and the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) to enhance transit services in order to improve mobility and regional access for residents in the communities of Cambridge, Somerville, and Medford, Massachusetts. The Project is required by the State Implementation Plan (SIP) and fulfills a longstanding commitment of the Central Artery/Tunnel project to increase public transit. The Massachusetts Air Pollution Control Regulations (310 CMR 7.36) require that MassDOT complete this Project by December 31, 2014. On October 15, 2009, MassDOT filed the Green Line Extension Project Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Assessment (DEIR/EA) with the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) Office. The Secretary of the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EEA) issued a Certificate on the DEIR on January 15, 2010. The Secretary’s Certificate stated that the DEIR adequately and properly complied with MEPA and with its implementing regulations, and required preparation of a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) of limited scope for the Proposed Project. MassDOT expects Project funding to come both from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and from Commonwealth bonding. Because MassDOT is seeking funding through the FTA, the Project also requires review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). At the request of the FTA, MassDOT is preparing a separate Final EA. The Green Line Extension Project is proposed to be built in two phases, with an initial operating segment (the “Proposed Project”) being constructed to College Avenue in Medford and a spur to Union Square in Somerville, as described and evaluated in the DEIR/EA as Alternative 1 (see FEIR Figure ES-1).
    [Show full text]
  • State Holds Public Hearing for Shattuck Campus Proposal
    THURSDAY, APRIL 15, 2021 PUBLISHED EVERY THURSDAY SERVING BACK BAY - SOUTH END - FENWAY - KENMORE State holds public hearing for Shattuck Campus proposal By Lauren Bennett portive housing that contributes positively to health outcomes, On April 13, a public hearing and contributes to the supply of was hosted by the state’s Division supportive housing in the region. of Capital Asset Management DCAMM project manager and Maintenance (DCAMM) to Loryn Sheffner explained some present the project proposal for of these goals further at the the Shattuck Hospital campus on public hearing, saying that they Morton St. in Jamaica Plain, and include a “minimum” of 75 to to allow for public comment on 100 supportive housing units, the proposal. as well as “integrated health ser- The Shattuck Hospital plans vices including both services cur- to move to the Newtown Pavil- rently offered on the site and new ion in the South End in 2024, types of services/programs cited and throughout a several year in the Vision Plan,” according to process, the community has been With “activity” going on in the background, Newmarket Business Association Director Sue Sullivan said this a slide presented. week at a press conference that she and some others in the community no longer support the re-opening of outspoken about what should be The state is also looking at the Comfort Station on Atkinson Street. This butts up against a call by neighbors in Worcester Square and done with the campus site. The “other allowable public health Blackstone/Franklin to re-open the Station as soon as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA District 1964-Present
    Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA district 1964-2021 By Jonathan Belcher with thanks to Richard Barber and Thomas J. Humphrey Compilation of this data would not have been possible without the information and input provided by Mr. Barber and Mr. Humphrey. Sources of data used in compiling this information include public timetables, maps, newspaper articles, MBTA press releases, Department of Public Utilities records, and MBTA records. Thanks also to Tadd Anderson, Charles Bahne, Alan Castaline, George Chiasson, Bradley Clarke, Robert Hussey, Scott Moore, Edward Ramsdell, George Sanborn, David Sindel, James Teed, and George Zeiba for additional comments and information. Thomas J. Humphrey’s original 1974 research on the origin and development of the MBTA bus network is now available here and has been updated through August 2020: http://www.transithistory.org/roster/MBTABUSDEV.pdf August 29, 2021 Version Discussion of changes is broken down into seven sections: 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA 2) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Eastern Mass. St. Ry. Co. Norwood Area Quincy Area Lynn Area Melrose Area Lowell Area Lawrence Area Brockton Area 3) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Middlesex and Boston St. Ry. Co 4) MBTA bus routes inherited from Service Bus Lines and Brush Hill Transportation 5) MBTA bus routes initiated by the MBTA 1964-present ROLLSIGN 3 5b) Silver Line bus rapid transit service 6) Private carrier transit and commuter bus routes within or to the MBTA district 7) The Suburban Transportation (mini-bus) Program 8) Rail routes 4 ROLLSIGN Changes in MBTA Bus Routes 1964-present Section 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) succeeded the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) on August 3, 1964.
    [Show full text]